Each launch - with a hit: Airborne Defense Forces shot down 12 HIMARS MLRS missiles in the special operation zone

Currently, American-made MLRS (multiple launch rocket systems) HIMARS play a very important role in the shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine both at the positions of Russian troops in the special military operation zone and rear facilities, as well as residential areas and civilian infrastructure in the liberated territories. However, the Russian air defense forces are increasingly effective in repelling missile attacks from the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

The Airborne Forces (VDV) of the RF Armed Forces also have their own air defense forces, which take an active part in a special military operation and are at the forefront in many of the most important areas.

The Telegram channel "Own War" publishes unique footage. ZRPK "Shell" of the air defense of the Russian Airborne Forces destroys 2 packages of MLRS HIMARS, and these are 12 missiles fired towards the territory controlled by Russian troops.

Interception at almost one point

- writes the Telegram channel.

12 launches from the Pantsir air defense missile system and each launch with a hit! This is a very effective work of the air defense unit of the Airborne Forces, a real record for a special operation. It also shows that the skill of Russian military personnel makes it possible to nullify the efforts of Ukrainian formations armed with Western military equipment. Here they are - the vaunted HIMARS in the confrontation with our "Pantsir" in the reliable hands of Russian paratroopers.

Recall that recently the Pantsir-1S air defense missile system was equipped with new software. Now he has received additional capabilities for tracking and destroying missiles launched from the HIMARS MLRS.

Comments

[rotmistr60]

12 launches from the Pantsir air defense missile system and each launch with a hit!

Practice hones professionalism, which we observe. Good luck to our air defense in the future.

[Machito]

Destroying 12 Hymars missiles is fine, but it would be better to destroy the 2 launchers that launched them.

[Zaurbek]

This is the wrong address, other organizations and other technicians should be doing.

[bayard]

Quote: Bearded

Destroying 12 Hymars missiles is certainly good

For the sake of truth, I’ll say that back in the spring of last year, I personally (albeit by ear) witnessed twelve launches of the Pantsir in a row with hits at regular intervals. Only then they most likely intercepted the enemy "Hurricanes". A few seconds later, another "Shell" started working and there were several more interceptions.
So the experience of intercepts with similar effectiveness is not unique to our air defense. But the Hymars really turned out to be a more difficult target due to a flatter trajectory and the need to rebuild the algorithms.

[Kaufman]

Excellent result! Above all praise!

[Argon]

And without VKontakte it was impossible to show?

[YOUR]

No problem
https://ok.ru/video/4343650585216

[UAZ 452]

12 destroyed? I've already destroyed 24 in the morning. Personally. What? Do the paratroopers have a confirming video? And why does it say "withdrawn from public access" on the window? This is so that once again the damned cissists don’t get smart that the video only shows how they shoot, but the video of the hits is somehow not visible?

[Ka-52]

this video has already been shown by all telegram channels. while you were destroying 24 Hymars under the covers) and hits there are perfectly identified.

[Xnumx vis]

https://ok.ru/video/4343650585216

[UAZ 452]

Thanks for the link. Watched the video. I didn’t see anything on it except for the explosions of the anti-aircraft missiles themselves. So it all comes down to believing or not believing. Evidence category "I swear by my mother." Is it possible to consider as proof the comments of someone behind the scenes that they are definitely "Chimeras" and they were definitely shot down. But at least let them downvote, but I would very much like more concrete evidence of the success of our air defense, allowing us to know for sure, and not just believe.

[Arcius Long]

Nobody has to prove anything to you. Especially to the heroic sofa seater. Not in our country, nor in any other country.

[UAZ 452]

And how are you in the trenches? Hold on? Short text.

[Arcius Long]

I don't sit in trenches. And of course I do not demand for myself a loved one, neither detailed reports nor feats. And I certainly do not criticize any of our guys. I have no such right.

[bayard]

Quote: UAZ 452

Watched the video. I didn’t see anything on it except the explosions of the anti-aircraft missiles themselves. So it all comes down to believing or not believing. Evidence category "I swear by my mother."

And you look at the work of the Israeli "Iron Dome" during the last massive shelling of Israel, there is also a trace of the flight of only Israeli missiles and gaps in the air. The rocket is not visible in the final section of the trajectory.
And regarding the effectiveness of our air defense, I’ll say that from the very beginning, the SVO has been working very efficiently and a large / suppressed part of the large MLRS missiles (Smerch, Uragan, Haymars) usually go astray. Chimera at first was a somewhat more difficult target for our air defense due to a flatter trajectory and other flight parameters. For greater efficiency, the software had to be upgraded, and now the "Shell", and "Toby" and "Beeches" work on them much more efficiently - at the same level as on Tornadoes with Hurricanes. And this is me telling you as an air defense officer in the past.

[YOUR]

How to do it? Put a video camera on each rocket. Or the Ukrainians should warn where the missiles will fly in order to put video monitoring there.
If the SAM misses, then it goes to the height for self-destruction. There are gaps here

[YOUR]

There is such a site - the military chronicle. Look, there are a lot of things incl. and this video was posted yesterday

[UAZ 452]

Thanks, I looked. Commentary on the above.

[_Engineer_]

I don’t even see the tracers themselves from the Hymers, I only see air defense breaks, although when the Hymers fly there is a clear tracer. Now we, as Ukrainians, are filming "idle" air defense bursts and rejoice.

[Ka-52]

I don’t see the tracers themselves from the hymers only

where do you get these from? "tracer" is the burning of the pyrotechnic sweep at the bottom of the bullet. The RZSO projectile has a jet engine. Usually, the engine does its work of acceleration in 3-8 seconds (different systems have different ones). Therefore, what kind of "tracer" can an RZSO projectile have at the end point of the trajectory, and even with a view of the teaching staff? When firing at maximum range, the RZSO projectile is in the air for almost 5 minutes. By this time, the engine is already cold as a dead man and does not give out any "tracers" .

[Svetlana]

Either shkolota not trained, or xoxol specially trained. He is obliged to introduce doubts, discord and misunderstandings into us.

[Kaufman]

There are no targets hit by Hymers missiles

[UAZ 452]

From which it follows that either they were all shot down, or they were not launched at that time.

[Skif]

Exactly, exactly. No tracers, no oscilloscope needles. It's not clear, right?

[oleg-nekrasov-19]

The Voennoye Obozreniye is silent about the fact that yesterday at around 14 p.m. Russian missile troops hit the S-300 air defense position of the Ukrainian army with an accurate strike of the Iskander operational-tactical missile system. Ukrainian troops have placed at least four launchers in pairs at a distance of several meters from each other, as well as a radar for determining air targets, in a forest belt northwest of the village of Lesnaya Stenka on the banks of the Oskol River. .As a result of the hit, a secondary detonation of ammunition occurred on two complexes. At least two S-300s were completely destroyed, the remaining two and the radar, most likely, were also disabled by fragments from the Iskander projectile and flying parts of the air defense system.

[Region-25.rus]

The "Military Review" is silent about the fact that yesterday at around 14 o'clock the Russian missile troops were hit by an accurate strike of the Iskander operational-tactical missile system

subscribe to the "cart" of VO (link at the bottom of the page) there this news was. Even with video

[bayard]

Quote: oleg-nekrasov-19

. At least two S-300s completely destroyed

Two launchers were destroyed, not two complexes. If a divisional kit is called a complex, then this is a radar complex + 12 (!) Launchers, 4 missiles each. And the most valuable part of the air defense system is precisely the radar. And if it is disabled, then the entire complex can be considered destroyed. Even if all launchers remain intact.
And the news is good. At the beginning of the NWO, the Sumerians had 31 S-300 divisions + supplies from sponsors. Today, most of them have been destroyed.

[Fedor Sokolov]

It is advisable to learn how to effectively destroy launchers, and not missiles upon launch.

[Ka-52]

This can only be done in a preventive way. It is not realistic to do this in a counter-battery way.

[shikin]

It would be nice, but difficult. He quickly moves into position, and probably no closer than 10 km from the front line, quickly shoots off the packet and quickly leaves. Here are the questions - what and where to detect (during the march - there is little sense, it is necessary at the position - from 10 km, or at the place of deployment - from 50-100 km), and how to quickly hit (UAVs at the position - they won’t be in time if they are close they are not on duty, but at the place of deployment, which is still difficult to find, only with missiles with a range of over 100 km, and with homing).

[alexey_444]

As long as our air defense missiles are much cheaper than American Himars, we are in the black. One antidote against offensive weapons is already ready, they will finish it with software and iron, so that they can shoot down automatically. America will have to create something new, and this, in addition to money, time, will also restore competencies. Everyone blames that we are sitting on the backs of the USSR, we fell apart all right, but they had everything, but they lost it, the Abrams are not able to do it from scratch.

[mad-max78]

Did the Shells have these abilities before the New Year's tragedy in Makeevka or after?

[igorbrsv]

These abilities appeared after the software upgrade. Recently, like 600 ukrov met with Bandera, all in one place, at the same time. Can you tell me what number?

[Svetlana]

Referring to a video posted on any of the social networks is a bad tone and a sign of ignorance. Not all are registered in OK, VK and Facebook

[Illanatol]

Quote: Fyodor Sokolov

It is advisable to learn how to effectively destroy launchers, and not missiles upon launch.

Preferably. But for this you need to have plenty of aerial reconnaissance in 24/7 mode and strike drones that can effectively hit mobile targets. Such launchers are best hit on the march.

[Ka-52]

the firing range of the M30 RZSO Himars emnip is about 80 km. Thus, only such units as the A-50 are suitable for reconnaissance - only its SBO Bumblebee can identify a single target at such a range. But you yourself know that we have, if possible, round-the-clock duty of long-range reconnaissance aircraft. Yes, and the Americans most likely give the forelocks data on the flights of our AWACS

[Crimean partisan 1974]

long-range reconnaissance aircraft.

... well, if theoretically that is .. these are over-the-horizon scanning stations .. it is they who are charged with tracking the launches of any flying and mover on the surface ... though there is a minus ... there are large dead zones .. and it’s not a fact that it detects launches from EPR MLRS projectile .... but who knows .... how do the crews find out about the direction of the attack and are fully armed in an organized manner

[2 Level Advisor]

None of the existing stations cover Ukraine, the "dead zone" - no one expected during construction that Ukraine should be in the coverage area. Therefore, in the CBO from the ZGRLS, there is zero sense. The detection distance from the borders of Europe begins..

[Amateur]

In a parallel article, they laugh at the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which "shot down" 47 missiles out of 50.
In this one, they decided to measure ̶p̶i̶p̶ the accuracy of their air defenses.
Interesting collection, but...

[Nastia makarova]

here is video proof and there are only empty words

[UAZ 452]

I have in the window of this video only the inscription "withdrawn from public access." Don't you?

[Roman Efremov]

Quote from: _Engineer_

I see only air defense breaks

And why are there "air defense bursts" immediately after launch? This is not a rocket self-liquidator - it works much later!

[optimist007]

Quote: Bearded

Destroying 12 Hymars missiles is fine, but it would be better to destroy the 2 launchers that launched them.

That's for sure!!!