Day of mobilization against the threat of nuclear war

45
Day of mobilization against the threat of nuclear war

Today, the world celebrates the Day of Mobilization Against the Threat of Nuclear War. Despite the fact that this holiday is perceived by many as a “passing” memorable date, in the current realities it takes on a special meaning.

To date, the so-called "nuclear club" includes 9 states. At the same time, the most powerful arsenals are possessed by the United States and Russia, whose relations can hardly be called “normal” lately.



Beginning in 2014, Moscow and Washington entered into an unspoken confrontation. At the same time, at the moment, the confrontation has reached its peak, in connection with which many experts are apprehensive about the likelihood of a direct conflict that could escalate into a nuclear war.

It would seem that such a scenario looks like something out of the realm of fantasy and can only occur to “particularly impressionable” people. However, do not forget that it is the United States that to this day is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons. weapon against civilian infrastructure and population.

Of course, Japan in 1945, unlike modern Russia, did not have the opportunity to strike back. But one should not write off the option of an "indirect" attack on our country. After all, Americans often use this technique.

In particular, technologists for creating nuclear weapons (“dirty bombs”) can “accidentally” fall into the hands of Ukrainian specialists who will assemble the warhead. At the same time, the APU already has a carrier (OTRK "Tochka-U").

By the way, it was precisely this that the head of the Russian Defense Ministry, Sergei Shoigu, warned about in February last year, which was one of the reasons for the start of the Russian NWO in Ukraine.

The situation is extremely difficult, but let's hope that the world will avoid a "nuclear apocalypse" this time as well. After all, there were similar prerequisites before.

Finally, it is worth noting that the theiatics was based on the date of the signing of the so-called Delhi Declaration, aimed at eliminating the threat of nuclear war by ending the arms race by the nuclear powers and gradually reducing nuclear arsenals, up to complete disarmament.

Sounds unbelievable? Meanwhile, one country followed this call. In 1989, South Africa completely voluntarily got rid of its nuclear arsenal. In addition, in 1992, the Lisbon Protocol was signed, according to which Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine were to get rid of their nuclear weapons inherited from the USSR as soon as possible. The latter, however, “draged out” the process until 1994.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    29 January 2023 08: 04
    But it seems to me that in order to prevent a nuclear apocalypse, it is necessary to raise the stakes. The West stopped taking Russian nuclear weapons seriously, due to the indecisive actions of our leadership. where.While there is
    1. +12
      29 January 2023 08: 16
      Agree. The United States is absolutely not afraid of a conventional war, for this they will throw Ukrainians, Poles, Germans into the furnace of war ........ war is a source of income for them, the ocean has always protected them from the troubles of war. The only time they felt the chill of a nuclear war during the Caribbean crisis and immediately sat down at the negotiating table, everything was very serious there. Recently, I have been more and more convinced that calls to red lines only encourage them, the war is already underway, no matter how we reject it, and here we need to show nuclear teeth, while tactical weapons, Germany or Poland, choose, this will indeed be the last warning for the United States, they will not twitch for Europe, they have already written it off, but they themselves will think about whether it is worth losing dollars and their lives that they love. Well, this is my personal point of view and it does not in any way call for a third world war, but sometimes it can prevent a big war. Who prevents us from stating without any lines there that in the event of real deliveries of tanks from Germany, a nuclear strike will be inflicted on it as a participant in the war, and this is absolutely certain, this statement alone will sober up the Europeans.
      1. -4
        29 January 2023 08: 27
        "they felt the chill of a nuclear war during the Caribbean crisis"
        Well, yes, only after that they banged Kennedy ...
        1. 0
          29 January 2023 09: 08
          Kennedy is to blame. Took a lot, upstart. I decided that he was managing something there, but in fact he was a cardboard fool.
        2. +2
          29 January 2023 09: 44
          Kennedy was slammed for deciding to take away the monopoly on the issue of money from the Fed. After this, how not to arrange an express impeachment for him?! Nuclear war, compared to money, is a trifle.
          1. +1
            29 January 2023 11: 52
            Et pourtant même des tons d'argent ...après une guerre nucléaire n'auront plus aucun intérêt ...
            Une preuve que leurs "sens des valeurs" est un peu faussé.

            yandex
            And yet, even tons of money ... after a nuclear war will no longer matter ...
            Proof that their "values" are a bit skewed.
      2. -1
        29 January 2023 08: 30
        Agree. It is necessary to introduce a doctrine and draw up lists of unfriendly countries and indicate there the targets where the missiles will fly in the event of a grand nix. Sent tanks - get a target for example Rammstein. It will probably sober up hotheads. And the inhabitants of these cities are not on their own. They in geyropa think a little differently than we do. And the sanctions did not help them because we are completely different. For example, these sanctions would have broken Europe long ago, even before the introduction laughing
        1. -3
          29 January 2023 09: 48
          Rammstein is more prudent to fall asleep with "calibers". American military-industrial complex, nuclear energy, missile silos, military and merchant fleet.
      3. +2
        29 January 2023 09: 07
        Let me correct you: the TNW strike should be launched not against Germany, but against Western Ukraine and, with a short break (if NATO does not react in the right way), against Poland, in the Rzeszow region. For Germany, in principle, will not be at war with Russia, and Poland is already at war in fact and is the most Russian-hating country in Europe.
        1. +4
          29 January 2023 09: 51
          Let the Irish forgive me, but Britain is obviously superfluous on the map.
        2. 0
          29 January 2023 10: 49
          I'm interested in something else: tactical nuclear weapons, decision-making centers, Washington, what red line is next - this is very good, but why is Zelensky alive? , the only more or less understandable answer is a pawn, it doesn’t solve anything, yes, but ... if he got into an accident, choked on burnt alcohol, fell headfirst on the ice, then the next pawn would think - would I really die next , this would be the case, and TNW - enough spirit!
        3. -1
          29 January 2023 12: 56
          Quote: Roma-1977
          a TNW strike should be delivered not against Germany, but against Western Ukraine and, with a short break (if NATO does not react in the right way), against Poland, in the Rzeszow region


          Why do we need radioactive contamination practically on our territory? If something highly explosive is thrown somewhere, then right into the volcano in Yellowstone.
    2. -1
      29 January 2023 08: 23
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      let's get out of the reduction agreements, we will conduct a demonstration test. Fortunately, there is where. For now, there is

      Along the way, Russia will have to do the same. The Anglo-Saxons have generally lost their fear .. To begin with, blow up one Poseidon in the Atlantic, and then launch the Avangard, let it fly in zigzags for a week ..
    3. 0
      30 January 2023 01: 34
      Germany MUST be struck directly. Demolish the Rheinmetall factories or the Reichstag.
    4. -1
      30 January 2023 22: 24
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      But it seems to me that in order to prevent a nuclear apocalypse, it is necessary to raise the stakes. Nuclear weapons

      Or hold a limited nuclear war in Ukraine. The main thing is to have time to inflict a massive nuclear hurricane on Ukrainian cities before the arrival of modern armored vehicles and aircraft from NATO countries. In the end, the United States encouraged Russophobia in the Baltics and Ukraine not to prevent residents in Donetsk, Tallinn and Crimea from speaking their native language, but to draw Russia into a tough confrontation with China and the Muslim world. First of all, the West does not need a war between the USA and Russia. After all, after that, he will lose competitive advantages in competition with China. If such a strike is delivered before the arrival of modern technology to Ukraine from the West, then this will save many lives for both Russians and Ukrainians.
  2. for
    +1
    29 January 2023 08: 06
    Whom to congratulate? Soon we will take a break from the holidays over the weekend.
    1. 0
      29 January 2023 08: 14
      Whom to congratulate? All "progressive humanity" .. True, I see regression in relation to it. Maybe, in fact, "you need to bang" ..
  3. +4
    29 January 2023 08: 10
    In 1989, South Africa completely voluntarily got rid of its nuclear arsenal.
    I got the impression that South Africa was simply "leaked" as unnecessary, at the same time running in some political technologies. For in the next twenty years of "unipolarity" the front-line countries turned out to be not only unnecessary, but even dangerous, as possible "centers of power."
    1. 0
      29 January 2023 08: 32
      All countries that are not close to the borders of Russia have automatically ceased to be of interest to the United States! Their "exclusivity" has ceased to be such.
  4. 0
    29 January 2023 08: 11
    Day of mobilization against the threat of nuclear war
    It's time to appoint the "Day of mobilization for the war." What the collective West is demonstrating today.
  5. +3
    29 January 2023 08: 16
    On the one hand, a typical cowboy scenario: a dashing cowboy suggests discarding revolvers. And then it turns out that he had another one hidden .....

    On the other hand, the descendants of serfs, who, like Indian leaders, revere "civilized white people" and want to save face and "as equals" - to conduct business ..... We are already glad that they are talking to them and seem to be "recognized as people too."
    1. +1
      29 January 2023 08: 29
      Quote: ivan2022
      On the one hand, a typical cowboy scenario: a dashing cowboy suggests discarding revolvers. And then it turns out that he had another one hidden .....

      Our guarantors have been responding in good faith to this proposal for thirty years, and we are being dragged along..
  6. +3
    29 January 2023 08: 19
    ...However, do not forget that it is the United States that to this day is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons against civilian infrastructure and population...

    Another problem for the whole world is that the United States not only gets into all existing military conflicts, but also creates new ones.
  7. 0
    29 January 2023 08: 33
    It's time to move from words to deeds: it is necessary to announce that in the case of the use of Leopards and other NATO tanks against the troops of the Russian Federation, we will use tactical nuclear weapons. And do so.
    1. +2
      29 January 2023 09: 21
      After the use of tactical nuclear weapons, the time will come for the use of strategic nuclear weapons. Are you ready to die? Washington has parity with us in terms of warheads, if anything, so there will be mutual destruction.
  8. -1
    29 January 2023 08: 36
    Absolutely need to bang. Americans just do not understand another language. Our management speaks a different language with them. It's like a conversation between the blind and the deaf. We must switch to their language, since they do not understand ours. And for this we need to show that the lives of our guys are many times more expensive than the lives of citizens of other countries, and we will defend these lives tough. Exactly the same as the Americans do. If they had not bombed Japan, they would have resisted for a long time in senseless agony, destroying their soldiers and American ones.
  9. +2
    29 January 2023 08: 44
    Today is quite an important event. The US started the war against Iran at the hands of Israel. It is strange that this news is not on VO.
    1. -1
      29 January 2023 09: 08
      Why do you think so? So far no one has taken responsibility. The strikes are targeted and limited using UFOs. Even the type of UFO has not yet been established.

      And yes, if anything, Israel is the one who invented and used Geranka in battles 40 years ago. wink

      Maybe it was Aliyev who delivered a retaliatory blow. In case you forgot, they have a break in diplomatic relations after the attack on the Embassy, ​​which official Iran is not going to investigate.
      1. 0
        29 January 2023 09: 59
        Quote: donavi49
        The strikes are targeted and limited using UFOs. Even the type of UFO has not yet been established.

        One of the last times, one of the Jewish officials said that they suspect the Luxembourg Air Force. Apparently, the iron duchy was annoyed with something again.

        In general, few people now play the game "we are not there" / "it's not us." Jews play. And someone better.

        By the way.
        To date, the so-called "nuclear club" includes 9 states.

        Nine enters, but the tenth does not enter, just walks.
  10. -2
    29 January 2023 08: 48
    The author needed to describe more the consequences of this very nuclear war. And then the local population does not differ in education, judging by the comments. Apparently this is all just a big firework
    1. +1
      29 January 2023 09: 17
      Local commentators are all experts in the field of the theory and tactics of nuclear warfare ..... they represent it all as a computer game ..... well, as they say, write garbage, don’t roll bags ...... no responsibility, what pearls: .. ... "launch Avangard, let it fly in zigzags for a week"
      And why does the General Staff not hire such experts?))))))
    2. -1
      29 January 2023 09: 24
      The inexorable logic of the development of events suggests that nuclear war is inevitable. It will probably be a limited nuclear war. The only alternative to nuclear war will be the surrender of Russia, its next dismemberment and robbery. If this is realized, then a nuclear war should be treated as a natural disaster. Russia did everything in its power to prevent this war from starting, but since it has become inevitable, there is nothing wrong with inflicting unacceptable damage on the enemy. What happened to our country in the 90s looked like the consequences of a massive nuclear strike. And this blow was unanswered. And this created for our kind partners the illusion of their complete impunity. Dangerous illusion. Someone will have to lower them to the sinful earth. With a roar.
      1. +2
        29 January 2023 10: 32
        Quote: Roma-1977
        The only alternative to nuclear war will be the surrender of Russia, its next dismemberment and robbery.

        After a nuclear war, there will be no Russia, and only cockroaches will be able to rob and dismember what remains in its place fellow
        1. -1
          29 January 2023 15: 00
          This is a profound misconception from the times of the "struggle for disarmament" and "détente", when the illiterate masses of Soviet people were subjected to ideological influence in order to force them to abandon confrontation with the united West. In fact, the use of nuclear weapons is not so apocalyptic. Moreover, I will destroy another nomenklatura myth: a nuclear war can not only be waged, but also won.
  11. -1
    29 January 2023 09: 18
    Since 2014, Moscow and Washington have entered into a tacit confrontation

    In fact, it hasn't stopped since 1917. There were periods of easing of tension, but the confrontation began long before 2014.
    1. -3
      29 January 2023 10: 07
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      In fact, it hasn't stopped since 1917.

      In fact, most of the time, Washington did not care at all about Eastern Europe, you never know the rogue in the world. But Moscow was always offended by this, it wanted to somehow become famous.

      It turned out in 48-91 years and about the last year.
  12. +1
    29 January 2023 11: 48
    Quote from Silver99
    Agree. The United States is absolutely not afraid of a conventional war, for this they will throw Ukrainians, Poles, Germans into the furnace of war ........ war is a source of income for them, the ocean has always protected them from the troubles of war. The only time they felt the chill of a nuclear war during the Caribbean crisis and immediately sat down at the negotiating table, everything was very serious there. Recently, I have been more and more convinced that calls to red lines only encourage them, the war is already underway, no matter how we reject it, and here we need to show nuclear teeth, while tactical weapons, Germany or Poland, choose, this will indeed be the last warning for the United States, they will not twitch for Europe, they have already written it off, but they themselves will think about whether it is worth losing dollars and their lives that they love. Well, this is my personal point of view and it does not in any way call for a third world war, but sometimes it can prevent a big war. Who prevents us from stating without any lines there that in the event of real deliveries of tanks from Germany, a nuclear strike will be inflicted on it as a participant in the war, and this is absolutely certain, this statement alone will sober up the Europeans.

    So it is, so it is! drinks
  13. -2
    29 January 2023 12: 22
    It's good that our president doesn't sniff coke!
  14. -1
    29 January 2023 12: 40
    Quote from Luka Nord
    To begin with, blow up one "Poseidon" in the Atlantic

    That would be interesting to see, by the way.
    Some kind of deserted island, Antarctica after all.
    Maybe there is a fear that the result will not be very good?
    And so it’s just a dream-bang ... near Antarctica there is a kilometer-long tsunami .. penguins get fucked up and find out that they can fly .. Westerners lay tons of bricks. Everything. The war is over. Tribunal.
    Uh-h
  15. 0
    29 January 2023 12: 42
    Quote: Dane
    And why does the General Staff not hire such experts?))))))

    There are enough of them out there. And these "such" are far from the worst representatives.
  16. +1
    29 January 2023 14: 14
    In this case, the most important thing is not to become second. Well, there won't be a third.
  17. 0
    29 January 2023 16: 30
    Quote: Turtle
    Kennedy was slammed for deciding to take away the monopoly on the issue of money from the Fed. After this, how not to arrange an express impeachment for him?! Nuclear war, compared to money, is a trifle.

    wow, a trifle, after JV money will lose value ...
  18. +1
    29 January 2023 16: 34
    Quote: Dane
    Local commentators are all experts in the field of the theory and tactics of nuclear warfare ..... they represent it all as a computer game ..... well, as they say, write garbage, don’t roll bags ...... no responsibility, what pearls: .. ... "launch Avangard, let it fly in zigzags for a week"
    And why does the General Staff not hire such experts?))))))

    couch experts, who were completely trained in computer games, their whole life is like a game on a computer ....
  19. 0
    29 January 2023 16: 35
    Quote from starina
    Quote: Dane
    And why does the General Staff not hire such experts?))))))

    There are enough of them out there. And these "such" are far from the worst representatives.

    there are enough parasites there ....
  20. 0
    29 January 2023 16: 37
    Quote: Negro
    Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
    In fact, it hasn't stopped since 1917.

    In fact, most of the time, Washington did not care at all about Eastern Europe, you never know the rogue in the world. But Moscow was always offended by this, it wanted to somehow become famous.

    It turned out in 48-91 years and about the last year.

    perhaps even a little earlier, since 1945 (probably, even before the end of the Second World War) ...