Russian UAV "Lancet" hit the Polish self-propelled guns AHS Krab APU near Kupyansk

During the Russian special operation in Ukraine, it became extremely clear that unmanned aerial vehicles are an integral part of modern armed conflict. Drones perform a number of important functions, ranging from reconnaissance and guidance of artillery, and ending with strikes against the accumulation of enemy manpower and equipment at long distances.

It is worth noting that at the very beginning of the NWO, our military did not pay due attention to these technologies. However, now the RF Armed Forces are actively using UAVs, which is already bringing tangible results.

In particular, the domestic loitering ammunition or, as they are also called, the Lancet kamikaze drone, showed itself well.

As he says in his TG channel reporter Andrey Rudenko, a Russian drone has reached its next target. The victim of the "Lancet" was the Polish 155-mm self-propelled guns AHS Krab, transferred to Ukraine.

The gun was hit by a drone while entering a firing position southeast of Kupyansk (Kharkiv region).

Happy hunting

- writes Rudenko.

It is worth noting that the aforementioned self-propelled guns are far from the only equipment that our loitering ammunition hit. Russian military correspondents have repeatedly published videos of how the Lancet strikes Tanks, armored personnel carriers and other weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Meanwhile, the drone is also capable of performing reconnaissance functions.

Comments

[isv000]

The Russian drone has reached its next target. The victim of the "Lancet" was the Polish 155-mm self-propelled guns AHS Krab, transferred to Ukraine.

Welcome, Abrasha, Leoperdam - in line!

[Two]

"Lancets" cat is too tough! There "Attacks" and "Chrysanthemums" will feast! Well, a couple of grenade launchers! They will cover the sides - mother do not cry! Send dumplings...

[Smoker]

about the video - the Lancet hit the bow of the Crab, I think the armor is strong here and the Lancet didn’t hurt the Crab in any significant way ...

[Oleg . B.]

"Notes" about the destruction of 7530 Ukrainian BMP tanks and other nonsense began to circulate on the Internet. People have stopped thinking altogether. At the beginning of the NMD, the Ukrainians had about 900 tanks and 1000 infantry fighting vehicles + gifts; about 300 tanks and 350 infantry fighting vehicles. Taking into account the fact that much of this list is still running, the loss figure is overestimated by 7-10 times. This is to the fact that often the desired is presented as reality. As in this case: CRAB attacked by our UAV - yes; destroyed - no. Not enough BB power. This must be taken into account and finalized by the UAV. And not to rivet victorious reports.

[Nastia makarova]

you have a lie!!!! more than 500-600 tanks have already been transferred, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers have been transferred under 2000 thousand, the crab is damaged, disabled, only today the laps of 3 777 guns were destroyed, there is a video

[Neo-9947]

Quote: Oleg. B.

Taking into account the fact that much of this list is still running, the loss figure is overestimated by 7-10 times.

You perceive the information as intended by the authors of the information.
They said "7530 TANKS and armored vehicles (small print) were destroyed." Everyone immediately ran into the word "tanks". What about bbm? Armored fighting vehicle? Not BMP, mind you. A jihad mobile with a manhole cover on the hood is also an AFV. So the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation speaks the true truth, and not nonsense, placing accents in the right places.
You just read and listen carefully to what we are told. So this article is called "The Lancet HIT the Polish self-propelled guns", it did not destroy, but it struck. True truth. And they told the truth, and the layman will naturally think that there is nothing left of the Pole, although this is not entirely true, or rather not at all.

[abc_alex]

Quote: Oleg. B.

At the beginning of the NMD, the Ukrainians had about 900 tanks and 1000 infantry fighting vehicles + gifts; about 300 tanks and 350 infantry fighting vehicles.

WHERE was it? In the troops? And it didn’t occur to you to ask how many tanks and infantry fighting vehicles the USSR left in Ukraine in general? Total? You are aware that THREE districts were stationed there. These are three fronts in the troops. 9 armies. 57 divisions. Plus the logistics system of the Western Group of Forces. Plus bases for long-term storage of the strategic reserve. Plus crowded areas of repair plants. Calm down the accusatory ardor and passion for sensations and simply accept it as a fact: there are enough specialists in Ukraine who can remove tanks and infantry fighting vehicles that were mothballed back in the USSR from storage.

[seamen2]

*Quiet accusatory ardor and passion for sensationalism and simply accept it as a fact: there are enough specialists in Ukraine who can remove tanks and infantry fighting vehicles that were mothballed in the USSR* from storage.
but if so, and owls. they even have a booty for armored vehicles, then why does Ze and his comrades ask *give Ukraine for the sake of* us abrams. leopardof, and more and more.

[bayard]

Quote from seamen2

but if so, and owls. they even have a booty for armored vehicles, then why does Ze and his comrades ask *give Ukraine for the sake of* us abrams. leopardof, and more and more.

Repair plants have their own limitations in their capabilities, especially after the strike of the Russian Aerospace Forces. We have to look for new sites for repair and restoration, including railway depots. Therefore, the amount of equipment repaired / restored from storage is usually inferior to the amount destroyed. So you have to ask "ukrainyradi".
In addition, there were few T-72 tanks at the beginning of the SVO - most of them were sold during the years of independence, and the main tank of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is the T-64 KhTZ.
In addition, Ukraine quickly began to run out of ammunition. All former "Varsovians" helped with Soviet calibers, and England and the USA are buying up Soviet weapons and ammunition around the world. But this was still not enough and the Sumerian art began to ... fade away. The fascists were saved by generous deliveries of NATO-made guns and ammunition. And today, most of the shells flying at us (Donbass, Donetsk) are of NATO caliber. And this is only "to ask Ukraine for the sake of it."

Quote from seamen2

abramsov. leopardof

Hope for a "miracle weapon", as before the "holy javelin", "white-winged horse" Bayraktar, "Caesars" and "Haymarsy". In the hope that it will definitely bring you with NATO tanks.
In fact, even in Europe there are still quite a few Soviet-made tanks. But not everyone is in a hurry to part with them. And the Sumerians need a Miracle.
So they give them such a miracle - about 150 tanks Abramis, Leo, Challenge and possibly even Leclerc. But there will be more. And this is the penultimate window of Overton before the entry into the war of NATO countries directly. The last window will be NATO fighters and attack aircraft (F-16, F-15 and A-10) already in the middle / end of spring.
By the end of spring, one can already expect the Polish Army in the vastness of Ukraine. And not only in memory. Yes, there are enough of them at the front.
Next, under the guise of tanks transferred to Ukraine, NATO tanks themselves will come in (since the beginning of 2014 they have been imported to Europe and hidden at bases and in mountain workings for the time being. Many have already been brought in.
No one is afraid of red lines anymore, so they will try to keep the entire Right Bank at least, and at most to cause any damage and persuade / convince / force to ... negotiations.
What will be a defeat for Russia.
Therefore, we must win.
That is why we will win.

[figwam]

Good hit, American self-propelled guns

[Grandfather]

a casual blow .. about nothing to "crab" to sneeze ... probably jerked with a drift from a position.

[figwam]

Quote: Dead Day

casual blow

No, she was burned by the lancet. The second of 6 delivered from Latvia.

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Smoker

about the video - the Lancet hit the bow of the Crab, I think the armor is strong here and the Lancet didn’t hurt the Crab in any significant way ...

6. The armor protects the crew of the Krab self-propelled guns only from small arms and fragments.

from the Lancet Crab did not cause anything significant Just like the Chinese door in the entrance.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Mavrikiy

Quote: Smoker

about the video - the Lancet hit the bow of the Crab, I think the armor is strong here and the Lancet didn’t hurt the Crab in any significant way ...

6. The armor protects the crew of the Krab self-propelled guns only from small arms and fragments.

from the Lancet Crab did not cause anything significant Just like the Chinese door in the entrance.

I don’t understand why you got minuses - the link you provided is working, reference material on the topic. No longer delving into the essence, just like cons sculpt
Previously, I myself did not look for information on the Crab, I went here and got acquainted, thanks

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Nyrobsky

reference material on the topic. No longer delving into the essence, just like cons sculpt

They always suffer for the truth. (In the land of unlearned lessons) Thanks for the moral support.

[4ekist]

"Lancet" hit the Polish self-propelled guns AHS Krab APU near Kupyansk

This news is two weeks old.

[volodimer]

in the cart I saw this video for a long time on ANNA-news, the same comments. Summary: not enough video to say about destruction, enough to say about detection and damage

[Argon]

More like a skew operator. I review and see that the operator directs, as if it were a car, and then realizing that he overtightened it, he did not have time to return it. Hence the miss. I hope to learn through a dozen other misses.

[MBRSS]

The lancet hit the nose of the Crab...

even when approaching, it was clear that the operator was clearly "smearing". Looks like the Lancet struck the right track.

[Alexfly]

And I'm talking about the same, the Lancet generally ricocheted from the bow, the remnants lie 7 meters to the left ... The damage is minimal. It is unlikely that they can wear a heavier warhead ... Cats will be like an elephant's pellet, the same thing about RGD7 ...

[Murmur 55]

Two , demolish the optics and external antennas and that’s the point, and without them the tank is so-so unit, repairs are possible, but it will take time.

[cash]

in Iraq, the "competition" also coped

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Dos

They will cover the sides - mother do not cry! Send dumplings...

With pYvom?

[Orange Bigg]

Hat-trick "Lancet" of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation under n.p. Kremennaya - the defeat of three US M777 towed howitzers.
https://t.me/s/voenkorKotenok

[Romario_Argo]

Lancets are not very effective when attacking along a flat trajectory
- ideal attack with a dive from above into the turret of a tank or self-propelled guns
and these are the skills already acquired over time by the operators of these UAVs themselves

[Orange Bigg]

Is it possible, on the basis of an effective ATGM for X-UAV attack drones, to create loitering ammunition similar to the same Lancet-3M? Just attach an engine and control, teleguidance from the Lancet to the X-UAV. .Or, to simplify, simply attach stray items from the Lancet-3M (engine, TV guidance) to the warhead from the X-UAV / Cornet.

[Prjanik]

Lancets are not very effective when attacking along a flat trajectory

Acacia would not agree

[Leshak]

Successful hunting, writes Rudenko.

Well, happy hunting!

[Prjanik]

Today, near Kremennaya, ukroart is being carried out very actively, in the morning 3 vidos with Lancet axes

[Mountain shooter]

Too bad it's weak. It would be a kilogram of 10 explosives, the tower would fly off. And so - I didn’t jerk the BC - they can fix it ...

[Murmur 55]

The mountain shooter, and it’s not clear what is smoking next to the Crab, the crew is not visible either running or running up. There is a hit, but you can’t understand how serious it is with the video.

[Johnson Smithson]

it is better to launch 3 to 3 kg than to have only 10 kg, which will be heavier and will have less barrage time
more than once there were videos that the Lancets still fly after them if the target is not completely hit

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Russian UAV "Lancet" hit the Polish self-propelled guns AHS Krab APU near Kupyansk

it's a pity that it's not near Warsaw

[Murmur 55]

Vasilenko Vladimir , at least near Lvov.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

near Lviv, everything must be cleared to zero near Warsaw as a one-time lesson

[Uprun]

I really hope that the crew was Polish ...., otherwise the cemeteries near the military units were already broken there, but there are no guests or not enough .....

[RED_ICE]

Ukrainians are also hitting our vehicles with the Switchblad.

[Nastia makarova]

where is the video??? lacentes have hundreds of videos))))) and Switchblad is recognized as a useless toy

[solar]

It seems that they hit the area of ​​​​the right caterpillar, possibly in the front armor plate, and the charge ricocheted further.
Camera stabilization is so-so, not easy to track.

[blackcat]

More "lancets" beautiful and different

[DominickS]

It is not clear why it was necessary to aim at the nose when there is a simpler and more critical target, in the form of a tower? She is usually armored worse. The cumulative jet may well flash it.

[Vladimir80]

Am I the only one who didn't see the defeat? something is smoking next to the sau and that's it ...

[Uprun]

Yes one...........................

[Cobra]

From what I can see, the impact passed, it looks like a caterpillar hit, there is no serious damage. Even a small explosion, the only thing that smokes there is the remains of a drone. Secondly, the leaves on the trees? When is this film, from spring?

[Aristarkh Pasechnik]

So loitering ammunition should work!

[km-21]

In my opinion, the defeat is not very convincing. In principle, there could be significant damage. On the other hand, it might not. In any case, the detonation of the ammunition did not occur. This means that irretrievable destruction did not happen.

[km-21]

We are often shown footage from the attacking Lancet's camera. But in many cases, you can notice a rather unpleasant feature. As the projectile approaches the target, the operator has the ability to clearly observe the target and choose the most vulnerable spot for the most serious defeat. However, often we see how the projectile deviates from the most correct trajectory and goes somewhere to the edge of the picture, where the vulnerability of the target is much less than desired. The conclusion is that either the operators are not experienced enough, or the Lancets are not maneuverable enough.

[Carlos Hall]

Another success of the Lancet, mass production and give it more destructive power.

[wladimirjankov]

it is doubtful that the lancet, hitting the front of the hull, caused significant damage to the self-propelled guns, since its warhead is not cumulative and has little power. The operator had to hit the turret with thinner armor there. There is a chance to break through it and cause the BC to detonate.

[Machiavelli]

If you knew how tasty and tender crabs are

[shark507]

Quote: Vladimir80

something smokes next to the sau and that's it

Most likely the wreckage of the "Lancet"

[helilelik]

Smoke is coming from the starboard side. Probably got into the MTO.

[IgorIP]

Apparently, the Crab escaped with a slight fright. And what to expect from ammunition, which a towed gun cannot always destroy. Dofiga video where the lancet flies into something .. even into tanks sometimes) But he can’t even theoretically do anything to tanks ...