Polish political scientist: Leopard tanks will not provide a breakthrough in a war of attrition

Poland is too obsessed with securing supplies to Ukraine of German tanks "Leopard", however, they are not able to provide a breakthrough. Polish political scientist Roman Kuznyar stated this on the air of Tok FM radio station.

According to Kuznyar, a phase of conflict has now begun, in which resources are decisive, in which Russia has an undeniable advantage. Ukraine has no chance to hold out for a long time.

The Polish political scientist also noted that the supply of Western-made tanks to the Ukrainian army will not solve its problems, since tanks are one of the first targets in the course of hostilities.

According to the political scientist, the highest expectations associated with the transfer of Western tanks to Ukraine are observed in Poland. Kuznyar recalled that for the effective use of such equipment, it is not enough just to have it - it is also necessary to conduct long-term training of crews, combat coordination, the creation of a stable communication system between tank units on the battlefield, in addition, for a tangible result, you need an appropriate amount of military equipment of this type and sufficient maintainability.

Based on this, the supply of tanks to the Kyiv regime, according to Kuznyar, will not be able to provide any breakthrough at the front, just as the supply of the American HIMARS MLRS, which also had certain hopes, did not provide any significant turning point in the hostilities.

The Polish political scientist recalled that a war of attrition is currently being waged, in which Russia has an indisputable advantage.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

Poland is too obsessed with delivering German Leopard tanks to Ukraine, but they are unable to provide a breakthrough.

That's right, sir. But Poland will gladly hand over its Lepards to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

[Maz]

Of course, they won’t provide a breakthrough, but they will slow down our offensive operations, and only a little more than a month remained until spring with the thaw.

[SergeyB]

Quote: Maz

Of course, they won’t provide a breakthrough, but they will slow down our offensive operations, and only a little more than a month remained until spring with the thaw.

Do you think that in a month they will be able to train crews and get some kind of result in battle? Unreal.
And if you send these tanks into battle, that's right tomorrow, then the crews who have never seen them even before the front line will not be able to get there.
So this technique is only for spring-summer.

[Hanurik]

A month later, a conscript already knows how to shoot from 2a46m1, and a trained tanker will not be able to retrain? Where did this myth about many months of training come from? Learning to use is not the same as learning a complete knowledge of tank design. I will even say more, a leopard gunner can be trained in a day if necessary. show how to turn on the suo, how to measure the distance and what buttons to shoot. Then he will automate this knowledge.

[SergeyB]

Quote: Hanurik

Where did this myth about many months of training come from?

Tanks have been in active use for over 100 years. Do you have examples when even an experienced tanker was put into a completely unfamiliar tank and he immediately began to fight successfully?
Months of training / retraining is not a myth, but a necessity.
If you have examples of the opposite, then REAL facts in the studio.

[SKVichyakow]

Quote: Maz

Of course, they won’t provide a breakthrough, but they will slow down our offensive operations, and only a little more than a month remained until spring with the thaw.

Therefore, there is nothing to wait for spring, we must already do it now. And it seems that they are waiting for the delivery of equipment by the West to the front, and then we will show you. Echelons with equipment must be destroyed on approach and transition, and not when they arrive. Soldier is not sorry?

[Romario_Argo]

tanks transferred to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will mainly be destroyed in the roof of the tower, even before the 1st line
Leopard, Challenger, Abrams, Leclerc
Lancets are not very effective. do not dive from above
and 152-mm guided projectiles (UAS) Krasnopol has all 100%
not a single tank in the world is able to withstand a 152-mm projectile hitting the turret roof
so still on the way from storage 200 self-propelled guns Pion and UAS 203-mm

[saigon]

Tanks, tanks screaming and caps in the air and reasoning on the topic of a child prodigy or not a waffle and not a child prodigy.
In a word, a spherical tank in a vacuum is just a tank and a tanker with a top all in white, like on a white horse, in front of the front line of tanks spinning everything.
Again tanks and around emptiness and horror.
People may have at least one commander of a 122 mm battery here to explain how many howitzer barrels and how many anti-tank guns are needed to put tanks in cancer and repel an attack. .(according to regulations)

[credo]

Well, it seems that Roman is not a stupid political scientist, but he did not understand the essence of this conflict started by the Anglo-Saxons.
For the Anglo-Saxons, any military and bloody conflict has many components and is not limited to these momentary interests - here is the weakening of Russia, and the weakening of the EU, and the "deliverance" of the weapons depots of NATO countries and other countries of the world from Soviet and European weapons, followed by the imposition of their weapons, and expanding its bloc, and pulling advanced production and capital from the EU to the USA, and so on, so on, so on.

So the tanks from the west to Ukraine are just for seed, Russia needs to prepare for the fact that planes and other serious weapons will pour into Ukraine further.

[Mikhail Drabkin]

how did not provide any significant turning point in the hostilities of the supply of American MLRS HIMARS,

--Yes? Did you forget the Alexander Bridge in Kherson??? To a large extent, this explains the Kherson maneuver.

—- There is still no tactic to combat HIMARS, leading at least to the probabilistic destruction of launchers.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Mikhail Drabkin

Alexander bridge in Kherson forgotten

Was this bridge destroyed by the Himars? So no, in a few months they only managed to damage him. Despite this, the bridge functioned to the last, ours used it to retreat and only then blew it up.

Quote: Mikhail Drabkin

no tactics to combat HIMARS

Just as there are no tactics for dealing with any other system with a range of more than 50 km, such as Tornado, Tochka-U, Iskander.
However, the number of Hymars has been greatly reduced.

[voyaka uh]

"ours used it to retreat" ///
---
Only on foot and by car.
The Ukrainians deliberately riddled him with Hymers across exactly above the support, and not in the middle of the span.
They didn't want the span to fall.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: voyaka uh

They didn't want the span to fall.

Uh-huh, not having achieved what they wanted, they pretended that they wanted what they had achieved.

[SergeyB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Uh-huh, not having achieved what they wanted, they pretended that they wanted what they had achieved.

Funny

[voice of reason]

They are like children. came up with a new chip and hype on it. Oh leopards leopards. Now we will agree, we will decide and we will be happy. Well, agree. And now, some are beginning to understand that reality is rough, iron, heavy and smells of gunpowder and blood. And in this reality of a dirty mess of winter Luhansk steppes and Donetsk waste heaps, all these "PR moves with tanks" will end in burning and blood. Here in advance and lay the straw. They understand that it won't work.

[Dave36]

Here are long-range missiles - yes, this is dangerous ... tanks will not solve anything. They sent so many of our 72ek without pathos .. and where are they? Are they worse than Cats?

[rotmistr60]

And he said right about the tanks, and about the Polish hopes that will not come true, and even finished well

a war of attrition is currently being fought, in which Russia has an undeniable advantage.

Today you need to have the courage to say such things in Poland, and even about Poland.

[Ivan Ivanov]

The Polish political scientist is seeking to increase supplies, but for us, arguments like "nothing is solved" are tantamount to slow fire for a frog in a pot.

[rocket757]

According to Kuznyar, a phase of conflict has now begun, in which resources are decisive, in which Russia has an undeniable advantage. Ukraine has no chance to hold out for a long time.

. Come on...let's make peace with them. Surely they will not give them resources?
However, their affairs, their problems ...

[archiroll]

Valera - maybe your time has come? ...

[voyaka uh]

Russia has more mobilization resource.
Ukraine, which is supported by the EU and NATO, has more
1) financial (credits and assistance from Europe and the USA) and
2) military-technical resource (military-industrial complex of more than 20 technically developed countries)

[nik-mazur]

Quote: voyaka uh

military technical resource

The difference is that an order is enough to use your resource, and in order to use someone else’s resource, you need to whine and persuade, then wait for other people’s uncles to get together, agree and send what they can or what they want, or what they don’t feel sorry for and when it’s convenient for them or when it works.

[Fangaro]

Reasonably said.
However, the supply of any amount of military equipment, ammunition, and even small arms to Ukraine, increases our losses.
Personal opinion...
The less we shout to the whole world about how successfully we circumvent sanctions, the better it will be for our economy, and for the RF Armed Forces, and for those countries that are with us.