Ground robotic systems in Special Operations

13
Ground robotic systems in Special Operations
Unloading RTK "Uran-6" somewhere in the Donbass, April 2022. Photo by UNM DPR


As part of the ongoing operation to protect the Donbass, the Russian army uses ground-based robotic systems of various types. Some samples of this kind are already well known to the public and this is not the first time they solve real problems. Others were previously tested at test sites, but did not participate in military operations. All together they should help achieve the goals of the Special Operation and solve some other problems.



Humanitarian mission


One of the most common and well-known domestic ground-based RTKs is the engineering Uran-6, designed to clear the area from mines, explosive devices and various ammunition. In the past, such equipment was repeatedly used to combat minefields in different regions of our country and foreign countries.

Already in the spring, in April-May, the Uran-6 complexes appeared in the liberated areas of Donbass. With the help of standard trawls of various types, remote-controlled vehicles cleared individual passages and entire sections near the combat zone. In the future, as our troops advance, Robots went to new areas that needed demining, incl. in the newly annexed regions.

Reportedly, the Uran-6 RTK has so far cleared large areas in four new regions. Most of the time they had to work on agricultural land that had recently been battlefields. Due to the long and systematic work, the complexes cleared large areas - strip after strip.


The robot clears the lane. Photo UNM DPR

Work was also carried out on the territory of settlements. So, "Urany" made a great contribution to the clearance of the city of Mariupol, incl. industrial buildings recaptured from the enemy. In the summer, Ukrainian formations began to bombard the cities of Donbass with anti-personnel mines. Engineering robots were involved in the elimination of this threat.

Recall that the Uran-6 product is a remote-controlled tracked vehicle capable of using various attachments. Several types of trawls and other engineering tools have been developed. The RTK is capable of fighting against anti-personnel mines or other low-mass munitions. Trawls destroy them by undermining them. The robot is controlled from a remote operator console. The operator controls the operation of the RTK using telemetry and a signal from several cameras.

heavy sample


RTK "Uran-6" is capable of neutralizing only small explosive devices, while heavier and more powerful ammunition can damage its design. In this regard, the Russian army has other engineering tools that can deal with heavier mines. Recently, in this category of equipment there is a robotic complex - the product "Prokhod-1".

RTC "Prokhod-1" was developed several years ago and is still being tested and demonstrated at exhibitions. In July 2022, an engineering vehicle of this type was first seen on the territory of Donbass. At that time, a short video appeared on specialized resources showing the process of clearing the field, incl. detonation of ammunition under the trawl.


Complex "Prokhod-1" at work, July 2022. Photo by Telegram / ChDambiev

However, new information about the use of "Passage" in the zone of the Special Operation has not been received since then, and the reasons for this are unknown. Perhaps the RTK was sent to the Donbass temporarily, and after such tests were carried out, it was returned home. Also, it cannot be ruled out that the heavy complex completed all its tasks in the summer, and now its work is not required. At the same time, it can be assumed that Prokhod-1, along with the lighter Uraniums, continues to clear the area, but simply does not receive due attention.

The Prokhod-1 heavy robotic complex was developed on the basis of the BMR-3M Vepr armored demining vehicle and is actually its specialized modification. When it was created, the chassis was saved tank T-90 with a special superstructure, target equipment in the form of trawls, etc. At the same time, remote control means appeared on board the armored vehicle - a communication system, a set of cameras and actuators. It is curious that the RTK still has regular jobs in the habitable compartment, and it can work under the direct control of the crew.

On the fields of Donbass, the Prohod-1 RTK used a continuous tank mine trawl of the TMT-S type. On the frame of such a trawl there are a large number of heavy rollers placed in two rows. With their help, anti-personnel and anti-tank mines are detonated and a passage is cleared sufficient for the movement of equipment and people. The TMT-S is also equipped with attachments for remote detonation of mines with an electromagnetic target sensor, a minesweeping device for anti-aircraft mines and a station for suppressing radio channels for controlling explosive devices.


"Pass-1" on trials. Photo VNII "Signal"

Test platform


The other day it became known that in the near future military tests in the zone of the Special Operation will be held by another promising robotic complex. On January 24, the former head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, said that the Marker multi-purpose RTK would be sent to the Donbass for verification.

Already in February, three robots of this type will be delivered to the area of ​​the Special Operation. Plans are reported to test unified platforms with reconnaissance and combat equipment. Such equipment will have to conduct reconnaissance of the area, detect enemy targets and issue target designation to fire weapons. The reconnaissance robot will observe the situation both by its own means and with the help of a tethered drone-multicopter. The standard UAV of the complex is capable of climbing to a height of up to 150 m and remaining in the air for a long time - power supply via cable from the RTK board removes restrictions in this area. The optics of the drone has an observation range of up to 20 km.

The combat version of the Marker will have to use different weapons options. Combat modules with a large-caliber machine gun, an automatic grenade launcher and a missile system will be tested by practice. With the help of such weapons, the RTK will be able to fight manpower, unprotected equipment and some enemy armored vehicles.

It should be noted that not only technical means will be tested under the conditions of the Special Operation. One of the main goals of the Marker project is to create new software that can work on operator commands or act with a given degree of autonomy. Apparently, in the course of future work in the zone of operation, the RTCs will work mostly independently, only under the supervision of operators.


Experienced robot "Marker" on a wheeled platform. Photo "Android technology"

News about "Marker" are of great interest. First of all, the very fact of the deployment of a new complex in the combat zone is curious. In addition, the goals of the Marker project related to the further development of robotics should be remembered. All this means that the course and results of future tests of three multi-purpose RTKs will not only show the results of this project, but will also affect the further development of domestic military robots.

Present and future


The potential of the robotic direction has not raised questions for a long time, and various complexes of this kind with certain functions are being developed for the army. Some of these samples have already been adopted, while others are only being tested. At the same time, both of them fall into the zone of the Special Operation and solve real problems.

Serial and experienced RTK perform the necessary work of various kinds and contribute to the achievement of the overall goals of the operation. In addition, it becomes possible to carry out additional testing of technology and find ways for its further development. Thus, robots help people in difficult and dangerous areas of work and at the same time contribute to the further development of a promising area of ​​science and technology.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    26 January 2023 04: 50
    Remarkable technique. The main thing is that it be in the troops in the required quantity and a little more in reserve. I really hope for it.
    1. +10
      26 January 2023 05: 32
      Remarkable technique
      Join.
      The main thing is that it be in the troops in the required quantity and a little more in reserve.
      I doubly agree.
    2. +2
      26 January 2023 05: 42
      Soon, very soon, our vehicles will have to face Abrams, Leopard Strikers, etc. ...here is an unexpected twist in NWO.
      1. +4
        26 January 2023 09: 44
        Unexpected?
        Even at the beginning of the NWO, many warned that in order to prolong the conflict, Europe and the United States would supply equipment to Ukraine if necessary. And they said that the longer the SVO goes on, the more types of weapons will be sent to them. But then for such an opinion they were branded "not patriots" and "alarmists". And it's been almost a year since it all started, and now the moment has come when the tanks really will meet soon.
        "Suddenly" this is usually for those who sincerely did not notice the problems and prolongation of the conflict for all 11 months.
        1. 0
          26 January 2023 22: 00
          Interesting people, to say the least. They do not listen when they are told something, and of those who listen, few people hear (deep into the essence). They go on their own wave, to the best of their 'competence'. It was said the war would be long! And you are still trying to drive your cart into the Spassky Gate, without even tying a bag under the horse's tail.
        2. 0
          28 January 2023 03: 27
          Back in 2008, prominent economists wrote that the best way to deal with the crisis is a big war. Back in 2010, the US military wrote that in order to defeat China, it is necessary to subjugate the Russian Federation ...
    3. +2
      26 January 2023 12: 11
      The main thing is that it be in the troops in the required quantity and a little more in reserve.

      What's the point of keeping it in stock? I would use everything that is available to the maximum, especially since these are piece samples, analyze the results, choose the best, carry out improvements and launch mass production.
      And I absolutely agree with the remark that these are not robotic, but radio-controlled systems. Do not confuse these concepts, these are "two big differences"!
      1. 0
        26 January 2023 23: 46
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        not robotic, but radio-controlled

        That's it!
        The reaction speed of the operator is the same as that of an enemy soldier. So who wins is a matter of luck. And a full-fledged robot that looks for targets in that direction, and shoots as it finds, can react much faster. And this is a new level of war. Canceling a lot of things from the existing army as a system.
        Before the LDNR joined the Russian Federation, there was still a chance that independent republics would create something breakthrough and unique, but now it is gone.
  2. +3
    26 January 2023 04: 56
    Well, such machines can not only deal with mine clearance. You can also put an air gun or a heavy machine gun and go ahead of the attackers or sit in ambush.
  3. +5
    26 January 2023 08: 53
    These are not robotic complexes, but radio-controlled ones. They are controlled by a person, not a program.
    1. +1
      26 January 2023 12: 37
      That's right, these machines have only touched robotics, here the simplest algorithms are commanded by a person with a remote control. Now, if such equipment performed the assigned tasks autonomously, then the operator would sit in the city N and from there exercise control in real time ... already over several, and maybe dozens ...
  4. +1
    26 January 2023 20: 04
    The existing "robotic" complexes have two drawbacks: they are too large (and expensive) and there are not enough of them. Rogozin instead of 40 "robots" drove four to the front and 000 months after the start of the war. Did he cut them out with a file for 11 months? In any car service, he would have collected more than one hundred of these during this time.
    .
    Looking at these complexes, you understand: the Design Bureau made tracks and armor instead of a robot and put old weapons on them. I do not rule out the presence of civilian cameras from door peepholes. These are not robots! And not even remotely controlled drones!
    Tank Design Bureaus know how to make caterpillars and want to make only caterpillars. They don’t know how to make robots, and they don’t want to share funding with pimply youths who can make robots.
    .
    For me to do? I would take the old tanks and instruct the newly created design bureaus to adapt them to remotely controlled combat vehicles. I will not voice more advanced ideas: they will play only after the first stage is completed.
    I’m afraid to describe another direction in general: the costs there are cheap, but the Americans will implement it quickly and massively, if they think of it.
  5. 0
    28 January 2023 03: 30
    In general, it is better to develop remote control kits for existing old equipment, such as the T-55 and T-62, so that they ride and clear the fields with existing trawls while the operator sits somewhere under a tree and looks at the phone. The tank will break down - they unscrewed the control unit and screwed it to another, and use the broken one as a target for firing.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"