Lukashenko announced Ukraine's proposal to conclude a non-aggression pact with Belarus

Ukraine is still afraid of the Russian army coming from Belarus, assuming that the Belarusian troops may join the Russians. As Alexander Lukashenko said today, Kyiv really does not want Minsk to join the hostilities.

Ukraine offers Belarus to sign a non-aggression pact. This was stated by the Belarusian leader at today's meeting on the socio-political situation and the state of crime in the country. According to him, the situation around the republic remains alarming, the West continues to hatch plans for Belarus, and in Ukraine they continue to train militants and extremists for operations on Belarusian territory.

I don't know why Ukrainians do this. On the one hand, they ask us not to fight with Ukraine under any circumstances, so that our troops do not move there. A non-aggression pact is proposed to be concluded. On the other hand, they prepare this explosive mixture and arm them

- Lukashenko said, but did not give any details on the pact, so we cannot say when Kyiv turned to Minsk with such a proposal.

According to the Border Committee of Belarus, to date, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has concentrated about 17,2 thousand military personnel of the Ukrainian army and territorial defense, militants of the National Guard and border guards near the Belarusian border. In addition, the Armed Forces of Ukraine built a 141 km long line of fortifications along the border with the republic. It includes not only fortifications, but also minefields. The task of this line is to delay the offensive of the Russian troops, if it follows.

According to Ukrainian intelligence, today there is no immediate threat from Belarus, but nothing can be ruled out.

Comments

[bath]

Only sovereign states can enter into treaties with foreign states

[smart ass]

While there is no pact, the ukrovermacht is forced to keep 17 thousand soldiers on the border with Belarus. The pact is not beneficial to Russia

[Machito]

Quote: Clever man

While there is no pact, the ukrovermacht is forced to keep 17 thousand soldiers on the border with Belarus. The pact is not beneficial to Russia

This reminds me of something: on the one hand, a non-aggression pact, on the other, the Brandenburg regiment. It's very historical. I don’t think that Old Man didn’t learn from Stalin’s mistake. Zelensky's cynicism just rolls over: Old Man is a non-aggression pact, and Zelensky is preparing terrorists against him and launching reconnaissance drones.

[Vend]

Quote from: wanna

Only sovereign states can enter into treaties with foreign states

But sometimes sovereign states deceive. The President of Belarus should not believe Stalin's mistake. This could end very badly.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

You tell this to dad .. Alexander Grygorich will tell you a couple of kind words. Without censorship, and I would say ...

[Prjanik]

I don’t think that any pacts and agreements with the Nazis and Bandera, especially under the roof of the impudent Saxons, are worth the paper on which they are written

[Machito]

Quote: Prjanik

I don’t think that any pacts and agreements with the Nazis and Bandera, especially under the roof of the impudent Saxons, are worth the paper on which they are written

If the paper is soft, then a non-aggression pact can come in handy in the toilet.

[Fisherman]

Ukraine and the EU have shown that the papers they signed, called "contracts", are worth it .... so But Father is just busy with PR.

[Egoza]

Here they want to use these 17,5 thousand in Ukraine, but But Father does not allow! ))) And rightly so!

[Stanislav_Shishkin]

Quote: Egoza

And rightly so!

And these 17,5 thousand owe him their lives.

[Woodman]

I don't know why Ukrainians do this. On the one hand, they ask us not to fight with Ukraine under any circumstances, so that our troops do not move there. A non-aggression pact is proposed to be concluded. On the other hand, they prepare this explosive mixture and arm them

So he refused the pact, or is he ... thinking about it?

[I dare to_notice_]

Ага.
And the parable of the tortoise and the scorpion ends with the words of the scorpion:
- Well, I'm such a shit...

[megadeth]

To remove part of the troops from the Belarusian direction. IMHO

[South Ukrainian]

What pacts? The clown regime does not recognize Lukashenka as a legally elected president. Although in this case, it is possible to conclude something, but then boldly violate "this".

[HAM]

Let Grigoryevich remember how such "pacts" usually end - only with deceit ... again, Kohlys are trying to win time ...

[YOUR]

It seems that Lukashenka is simply trolling them. Everyone understands that Zelya will never conclude such an agreement with Lukashenka, but he can say at any moment in any international body such as the UN - we proposed.

[isv000]

Quote: HAM

Let Grigoryevich remember how such "pacts" usually end - only with deceit ... again, Kohlys are trying to win time ...

Batko remembers how Russian special forces stood at the border when Sveta-Kotlet was overexcited in Minsk. I think he has the wisdom to send Ze and his company to Pushcha...

[Bayun]

"Non-aggression pacts" with the fascists end... with an attack! Belarusians do not know.

[Stas157]

Russia and Belarus are diligently creating the threat of attack. And Ukraine is begging for a promise not to attack. The threat is working.

[YOUR]

In the comments, as it were, they perverted a little. One gets the feeling that it was Lukashenka who proposed to conclude a non-aggression pact, in fact

Lukashenka said that the Ukrainian side proposes to conclude a non-aggression pact with Belarus.
“I don’t know why the Ukrainians are doing this. On the one hand, they ask us not to fight with Ukraine in any case, so that our troops don’t move there. They suggest signing a non-aggression pact. Poland and Lithuania have gone crazy. Why do they need it? It is not clear. Therefore, we are forced to react harshly," Alexander Lukashenko said.

[Iskander]

pact of ribentrop molotov))), ??? if they are so often not respected in history? why include them?
only if under the guarantees of Klitschko and Merkel
and Yanukovych, on the reverse side of the Minsk agreements, so as not to spoil the paper

[rotmistr60]

A non-aggression pact is proposed to be concluded

On the example of "Minsk-1,2" it is possible with a 100% probability to predict the fate of such a pact in the event of its conclusion. And Lukashenka understands this.

[the same doctor]

They also concluded Minsk with Donbass. So with Luka, the pact will only be to prepare for an attack on Belarus.

[opposite28]

I don't know why Ukrainians do this. On the one hand, they ask us not to fight with Ukraine under any circumstances, so that our troops do not move there. A non-aggression pact is proposed to be concluded. On the other hand, they prepare this explosive mixture and arm them

- Lukashenko said, but did not give any details on the pact, so we cannot say when Kyiv turned to Minsk with such a proposal.

It's getting dark again, dad...

[Valery_37_RUS]

The tactics are from the outskirts. Conclude agreements and not fulfill them, but use them for your own purposes, for the time won. You can’t trust the outskirts, the West, the Americans.

[the same doctor]

You can, of course, demand normalization of relations, recognition of Lukashenka's legitimacy, the extradition of Belarusian criminals from Ukraine, tribute in raw materials for Belarusian enterprises, the return of confiscated and embezzled property ...
.
Only the Ukrainian political tradition provides for any promises. What about hanging? They will hang later. If you want a new Khatyn, sign an agreement with Kyiv.

[Graz]

What is the point for Belarus to conclude such a pact? It will not cost the price of the paper on which it will be written for Ukrainians

[sanik2020]

Pacts are not concluded by states, but by people, or non-humans, who manage them.
In 1939, we already concluded a non-aggression pact with the fascist regime of non-humans and learned its price.
So, to conclude some kind of pacts with the Bandera regime means to get the year 1941 again.
Well, the Old Man, I think, will also intrigue them for the good of the cause.

[optimist007]

Pact in style, let us get ready and we'll come without knocking.

[Hiller]

There was already a non-aggression pact between the Third Reich and the USSR. We also know how it ended. Well, there were also Minsk agreements ... I think But Father knows the answer is not such "pacts".

[optimist007]

This is just a test of Belarusians for lice, like we are so peaceful, but you.

[optimist007]

With one hand they hold a pen, sign the pact, and in the other a fig.

[optimist007]

They still remember the purpose for which the Minsk agreements were signed, Frau Merkel seems to have clearly stated this.

[A. Erokhin]

About-boot. How to drink to give ... not the first time

[Vdi73]

As a group of armies 'Center', Rokossovsky gouged, kept the reserves of the Nemchura chained to three tank armies in Ukraine, and struck through Belarus.

[Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira]

Definitely nae ..., sorry, deceived! For these, instead of conscience and decency, everything has grown for a long time, and therefore, to have business with them, do not respect yourself! That's when they wash off all the greenery from themselves, they refuse to stir up, then it will be possible to think. True, first of all, remove all weapons, except for slingshots!

[opposite28]

Minus, handsome no doubt. Lukashenka, as always, was and will be in his repertoire. Either Lukashenka swears love for Russia and friendship with the Russian Federation, now Lukashenka was offered some kind of "Non-Aggression Pact" by the Ukrainians or from outside the Ukrainian country (!) Marlison ballet third part, show must go on...

[isv000]

Quote: oppozite28

Minus, handsome no doubt.

I give you a minus for "MVIN" - you must respect your state and its heritage! ...

[isv000]

Batko! Keep in formation! A pact had already been made with the Germans. About no attack. The Sumerians of the Germans will be worse !!!

[Dgdenis]

It is pointless to conclude any non-aggression pacts. They are concluded only in words. Today the right of the strong rules