How Manstein Saved the German Army from Disaster in Early 1943

36
How Manstein Saved the German Army from Disaster in Early 1943
German tank Pz. Kpfw. VI "Tiger" from the 503rd heavy tank battalion near Rostov-on-Don. January 1943


To Rostov


On January 1, 1943, after the completion of the Kotelnikovsky battle (the German operation "Winter Thunderstorm"), which buried the hopes of the German command to release the army of Paulus, the troops of the Stalingrad Front, renamed the Southern Front, without a pause, launched an attack on Rostov and Tikhoretskaya. There was a threat of defeating the entire German southern wing of the Eastern Front (How the Soviet Headquarters prepared the Caucasian cauldron).
The commander of the German Army Group Don, Erich von Manstein, had only 500 German divisions on the 15 km front line. At the same time, part of the divisions had already been defeated. So, from the 57th tank corps, which in December 1942 tried to break through to Stalingrad to save the 6th army, almost nothing remained. In the same situation was the 22nd tank division, it will be disbanded in March. The three airfield divisions of the Luftwaffe were fresh and complete, but their combat effectiveness was noticeably less than that of the Wehrmacht divisions.



The allied Romanian divisions showed low combat readiness when they had to hold the blow, and not advance behind the Germans. So the 3rd Romanian army was almost completely destroyed in the Battle of Stalingrad. The Romanian 4th Army suffered heavy losses. The remaining divisions of the 4th Army took part in Operation Winter Thunder, covering the German flanks. Here the Romanian formations were completely demoralized. They had to be removed from the front and sent to the rear for reorganization. Thousands of Romanians surrendered.


To the north of Millerovo, on the left wing of the Don group, where the 8th Italian Army had previously been (completely defeated), a 100-kilometer gap gaped. It was hastily closed by a hastily knocked together group "B" of General Fretter-Pico (2 divisions). Two armies of the Southwestern Front acted against Group B - Kharitonov's 6th Army and Kuznetsov's 1st Guards Army.

In the large bend of the Don at the turn of the Bystraya and Tsimla rivers, the task force of General Hollidt, 200 divisions (including 10 tank divisions: 3th, 6th and 11nd), held a 22-kilometer section of the front. In the area of ​​​​the German air bases Tatsinskaya and in Morozovsk, the German 48th tank corps of von Knobelsdorf fought back. From the north and east, the Hollidt group was attacked by the Soviet 3rd Guards, 5th Tank and 5th Shock Armies.

South of the Don, at the turn of the Kuberle River, the remnants of the 4th tank army of Gotha (17th and 23rd tank, 15th air field, 5th motorized division of the SS Viking) defended themselves. South, at the turn of the river. Manych, the 16th motorized division of Schwerin, transferred from Elista, was located. Goth's troops held back the attacks of the 2nd Guards, 51st and 28th armies.


The striking power of the Red Army


In the seven armies of the South-Western (SWF) and Southern Fronts (South Front), which carried out the Rostov operation, there were over 700 thousand soldiers and officers. And the attack was 17 tank and mechanized corps. The tank and mechanized troops of the Red Army were restored in 1942. This was due to two main factors:

1) a significant increase in military production, including armored vehicles;

2) the need for offensive operations.

By January 1943, the Red Army had 24 tank and 8 mechanized corps. In 1942, the first two tank armies of mixed composition were created (together with 2 tank corps, they included cavalry and rifle divisions, separate tank brigades).

At the same time, heavy breakthrough tank regiments were formed, armed with tanks of the KV or Churchill type. Most of the armored formations were in the south - as part of the South-Western, Southern and Donetsk fronts.

The tank corps had 3 tank and 1 motorized rifle brigade, other units and subunits. A total of 7 men, 800 tanks and 168 guns and mortars. The mechanized corps included 100 mechanized and 3 tank brigade, anti-tank and anti-aircraft artillery regiments, other units and subunits. A total of 1 thousand people, 15-175 tanks, more than 224 guns and mortars. In terms of combat capabilities, the Soviet mechanized corps was approximately equal to the German tank division (about 150 thousand people, 17 tanks and self-propelled guns, more than 200 guns and mortars).

According to the order of the People's Commissar of Defense of October 16, 1942, armored formations should be used in the offensive in the direction of the main front strike after the combined arms formations had overcome the main defensive zone as a success development echelon. In defense, tank formations were used to carry out counterattacks. However, in practice, our commanders often threw tank corps against the unsuppressed and poorly explored enemy defenses in order to break through the enemy defenses. In defense, tanks plugged any gaps in the front. This led to heavy losses of mobile units in manpower and equipment.

The training of personnel and command personnel of mobile units was also very lame. The hulls were thrown into battle raw. Intelligence was unsatisfactory, the interaction of tanks with infantry and vice versa, as well as tanks with artillery, was poorly organized. The interaction was superficial. Part of the tank formations were sprayed, the blows were "spread fingers". They attacked in the forehead, squeezed out the enemy, did not use the opportunities for coverage, bypass and encirclement. The commanders were afraid of encirclement, so as not to fall into the cauldron themselves. This led to heavy losses, the potential of offensive operations was used only partially. The Germans managed to retreat, regroup forces and delivered strong counterattacks.

For example, during the Kozelsk battle (counterattack of the left wing of the Western Front in the area of ​​Sukhinichi and Kozelsk - August-September 1942), the Soviet 3rd tank army, which received 510 tanks, lost 45% of its personnel and more than 50 % of combat vehicles, burned a bunch of ammunition and fuel, and recaptured an area 20 km wide and 7-8 km deep from the enemy.

It is worth noting that during the current Ukrainian campaign, Russian generals repeated these mistakes of the Soviet command. Exploration failed. The interaction of forces and combat arms is poor. Management and communications are unsatisfactory. The most powerful fortified areas of the enemy are storming in the forehead. Although military science teaches that the best forms of combat are encirclement, bypass and encirclement. The thought of the need to form several tank and armies and 20-30 corps and divisions in order to carry out deep breakthroughs, apparently, did not reach. The command is obviously afraid to go for a deep breakthrough, after an unsuccessful blitzkrieg at the beginning of the campaign. Since they can only attack in company battalion groups. In general, the lessons will be difficult. God grant you have time to learn how to fight before you have to butt heads with NATO battle groups and divisions.


Commander of the 7th Tank Corps of the Red Army, Lieutenant General Pavel Alekseevich Rotmistrov in the turret hatch of the KV-1 tank in Kotelnikovo. End of December 1942

Mission Impossible


At the same time, the Red Army learned quickly. Manstein noted that during the Stalingrad operation, the Russian command acted quite energetically and learned a lot from the beginning of the war. Especially with regard to the organization and use of large tank formations. The Russians organized tank corps and used deep penetration tactics.

The German headquarters in January 1943 set extremely difficult tasks for Manstein. Continue measures to save the army of Paulus. At the same time, cover the rear of Army Group A, its communications that passed through Rostov-on-Don. The Don group was reinforced only by the 7th Panzer Division. At the same time, the Fuhrer demanded to fight for every inch of Russian land. It was a dispute between a military and political leader.

It was clear to the military that it was necessary to maneuver, to give up territory in order to save the army. Hitler operated on political and economic factors. He could not voluntarily surrender the occupied lands. I thought about the coal of the Donbass, the oil of Maykop, the bread of Ukraine, etc. It was impossible to refuse to save the army of Paulus. Therefore, the order of the German Headquarters was appropriate: "Stand to the death!" In particular, to keep the airfields of Morozovsk and Tatsinskaya, from where the air bridge went to the garrison of Stalingrad.

As a result, Manstein created a real strategic miracle. He relied on well-coordinated maneuver actions, not being afraid to weaken secondary sectors of the front, or even leaving previously occupied territories.

All requests from the headquarters of Army Group Don to transfer at least three divisions from Group A to reinforce the Goth tank army were refused from the German headquarters. Therefore, Manstein put an end to the army of Paulus. However, the "Stalingrad fortress" was supposed to hold out as long as possible, holding down the Russian troops. Manstein's troops were supposed to maneuver, launch counterattacks, if necessary, then surrender secondary positions, hold Rostov by any means and ensure the withdrawal of the 1st Panzer Army. It was supposed to carry out the transfer of forces from the right flank to the left and organize a strong counterattack in order to regain all previously lost positions by spring.


Field Marshal Erich von Manstein with officers at the map in the Don region. 1943

Active defense


First, it was necessary to hold the front, not to let it fall apart. The evacuation of Mackensen's 1st Panzer Army from the North Caucasus required 25 days for Army Group A, according to Kleist's report.

Already on January 5, 1943, Manstein surrendered Morozovsk. He put the High Command of the Wehrmacht before a choice: either he makes a decision that suits the situation, or resign. The Don group simply did not have the physical ability to simultaneously save the 6th Army, hold the front along the entire line and cover the withdrawal of troops from the Caucasus. And even more so - to repel all Russian attacks and regain lost positions. There were no reserves. Anti-aircraft gunners were thrown into battle, battle groups that were put together from the rear, vacationers and convalescents.

Therefore, the Hollidt group slowly backed away to the Seversky Donets, preventing the Russians from breaking through to the crossings at Belaya Kalitva, Kamensk-Shakhtinsky and Voroshilovgrad. Thus, the Germans closed the approaches to Rostov from the north.

In this direction, the powerful 3rd Guards Army of the SWF under the leadership of Lelyushenko tried to break the German defense - 9 guards, rifle, motorized rifle and artillery divisions, 3 brigades, 1st guards mechanized, 2nd guards and 25th tank corps. In early January, Lelyushenko's army will receive two fresh tank corps - the 2nd and 23rd. They will be thrown into the breakthrough to Kamensk. In the same direction, Popov's 5th tank army was advancing - the 1st and 2nd tank corps, three rifle divisions. Popov's army developed an offensive against Tatsinskaya, which was 45 km away. It took 10 days to reach her.

Kamensk, which was defended by the Fretter-Pico group, and a month later was with the Germans. The German infantry skillfully defended themselves. General Hollidt maneuvered his three panzer divisions. German tanks were timely deployed to dangerous places, delivered short but sensitive counterattacks. By the end of January 1943, there were almost no tanks left in the tank corps of the 3rd Guards Army.


German tank Pz. Kpfw. IV Ausf. G near the village of Kotelnikovo. Vehicle fitted with winter tracks (Winterketten), December 1942.

To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    25 January 2023 05: 20
    When Mr. Samsonov does not know how to finish an article, he writes: "To be continued .." Well, we know very well that there will be no continuation.
    1. +12
      25 January 2023 05: 45
      No, somehow it was. But it would not be better.
    2. +4
      25 January 2023 23: 03
      Yes, what is it, like, against the background of his eternal "Russian Army and Navy" he started normally laughing
  2. +6
    25 January 2023 06: 30
    The most powerful fortified areas of the enemy are storming in the forehead. Although military science teaches that the best forms of combat are encirclement, bypass and encirclement.

    Do you think they don't know?
    They know, but it’s impossible to get around towns like Avdiivka and Marinka, the generals of the Armed Forces of Ukraine also know detours and coverage, and so they built a defense based on artillery and minefields, with well-equipped camouflaged observer positions, and did not build reinforced concrete pillboxes. It is impossible to advance around the open field under artillery strikes; all that remains is to slowly move from cover to cover along the building. There is a way to quickly overcome such a defense, this is the elimination of enemy communications, but our electronic warfare turned out to be powerless ... The second way is counter-battery combat, but even here the effectiveness without the use of aviation is very low. Such is the tactical impasse due to the technical imperfection of "minor" types of weapons. Not armor and powerful projectiles determine the winner, but the connection that allows for effective control of hostilities.
    1. 0
      25 January 2023 07: 07
      I agree in many respects, where you write about tactics and the situation with Avdiivka and other "old" fortifications of the enemy. Indeed, a defense was built there based on the coordination of barrage artillery and mortar fire at the coordinates of observers, and reconnaissance equipment. The observers themselves are located secretly, covered by minefields and sniper-machine-gun fire from hidden firing points. Bypassing such positions is impossible, also due to the high efficiency of modern anti-tank mines, as well as the saturation of enemy infantry units with effective anti-tank weapons.
      It is one thing to make a breakthrough in the Volga steppes, another to move in a continuous residential agglomeration where cities smoothly flow into villages, and those into garden plots. By the way, when the war moved to Germany, where there were comparable conditions (buildings plus faustpatrons) and the enemy’s defenses thickened, Soviet operations also took on a more straightforward character - without deep coverage and detours. For comparison, Staligrad and Vistula-Oder:
    2. Eug
      +2
      25 January 2023 08: 47
      There is a continuous agglomeration, it can “fly in” from behind every corner and any window opening. If the Armed Forces of Ukraine connected some houses (buildings) underground - through basements (and there was time not to refuse professionalism) - then the difficulties increase many times over.
    3. +8
      25 January 2023 18: 29
      However, in 2014 the People's Republics without generals created two boilers. And our pot-bellied generals are driving their soldiers head-on into powerful fortifications. So no need to strain your brain
    4. 0
      26 January 2023 10: 35
      it is impossible to get around towns like Avdiivka and Marinka, the generals of the Armed Forces of Ukraine also know detours and coverage, and so they built a defense based on artillery and minefields

      If it is impossible to get around, then you can throw out a tactical assault on helicopters, suppress enemy artillery in counter-battery combat, disrupt the supply of troops in a separate sector of the front with missile and air strikes, use RDGs while storming in the forehead.
      There are methods. But as practice shows, the technical superiority of the enemy affects. We can’t suppress artillery, reconnaissance equipment also lags behind the enemy, and we can’t prevent the supply of reserves either. There remains one way, which is used.
  3. +8
    25 January 2023 06: 58
    Unfortunately, the article omits the fact that Paulus, and then Manstein, were practically deprived of the support of the Luftwaffe, since Hitler sent the aircraft of the "South" group to the Mediterranean Sea to cover the transfer of the 5th Panzer Army to Tunisia ... it turned out "Trishkin caftan ". Then history repeated itself near Kursk in 43. Then part of the aviation was transferred to a more important sector from Hitler's point of view, to the south of Italy, where the Allied landing on Sicily began. And of course, Operation Bagration, which began on June 23, since on June 6 German aircraft departed for France, where Operation Overlord was already underway, leaving only 60 fighters, and Stalin did not miss such a moment, collecting 6000 aircraft from several fronts for destruction Army Group Center. These are the "maneuvers" and the German military art could not really do anything without the support of the Luftwaffe. In their memoirs, both ours and the German generals did not particularly share their successes with aviation, but described their tactical moves in the form of arrows as the main factor in successful military operations ... coverage, bypass, encirclement ...
    1. 0
      25 January 2023 12: 01
      Quote: Konnick
      Unfortunately, the article omits the fact that Paulus, and then Manstein, were practically deprived of the support of the Luftwaffe, since Hitler sent the aircraft of the "South" group to the Mediterranean Sea to cover the transfer of the 5th Panzer Army to Tunisia ... it turned out "Trishkin's caftan ". Then history repeated itself near Kursk in 43. Then part of the aviation was transferred to a more important sector from Hitler's point of view, to the south of Italy, where the Allied landing on Sicily began. And of course, Operation Bagration, which began on June 23, since on June 6 German aircraft departed for France, where Operation Overlord was already underway, leaving only 60 fighters, and Stalin did not miss such a moment, collecting 6000 aircraft from several fronts for destruction Army Group Center. Such "maneuvers" and the German military art could not really do anything without the support of the Luftwaffe.

      Eggs interfere with a bad dancer!
      The ratio of losses, from September 1942, began to change dramatically in the opposite direction (RKKA: Wehrmacht):
      1.3 : 1 until July 1943;
      1 : 1 until March 1944;
      0.7 : 1 until December 1944;
      1:3 in 1945.

      The Red Army tritely learned to fight on equal terms against the Wehrmacht by July 1943, having large human and natural resources. This is the main reason for Germany's defeat on the Eastern Front.

      As for the "frosts", "short-sighted generals of the Wehrmacht", "lack of aviation", this is nothing more than clinical stupidity. Study the losses of the parties by periods, then the real reasons for the defeats of the Wehrmacht will become clear!

      Today's situation.
      The same reasons will play against NATO, if anyone does not understand. Now the level of the Russian army against NATO is being tested - the growth of the professional combat level and the restructuring of the military-industrial complex for the needs of military operations. It is for this reason that NO ONE IS IN ANY HURRY, AND NOT AT ALL FOR THE REASON OF CONTRACTS. Precisely because of the LONG GAME AGAINST NATO!

      To hell with all 24 regions of Ukraine, if the entire mobilization reserve can be ground to smithereens in 4 new Russian regions! If they, like flies on shit, climb into the Donbass themselves, then why shove it on the rest of Ukraine? Restoring 4 regions is still easier than 24, if someone has a bad understanding!
      1. +1
        25 January 2023 15: 33
        The Red Army tritely learned to fight on equal terms against the Wehrmacht by July 1943, having large human and natural resources. This is the main reason for Germany's defeat on the Eastern Front.

        When Germany lost air supremacy on the Eastern Front after the air battle in the Kuban, this was the main reason for the loss.
        1. 0
          25 January 2023 17: 00
          When Germany lost air supremacy on the Eastern Front after the air battle in the Kuban,

          This is a very optimistic (for the Soviet Air Force) picture and the results of the air battle in the Kuban are very .. ambiguous. In principle, the Germans retained a noticeable advantage in the air until the summer of the 44th. At least in those sectors of the front where they had aviation.
          1. +3
            25 January 2023 21: 35
            Well, it was an advantage, but there was no longer any talk of dominance.
        2. -2
          25 January 2023 22: 40
          Quote: Konnick
          The Red Army tritely learned to fight on equal terms against the Wehrmacht by July 1943, having large human and natural resources. This is the main reason for Germany's defeat on the Eastern Front.

          When Germany lost air supremacy on the Eastern Front after the air battle in the Kuban, this was the main reason for the loss.

          That's why I wrote:

          Quote: Damir Zakirov
          As for the "frosts", "short-sighted generals of the Wehrmacht", "lack of aviation", this is nothing more than clinical stupidity. Study the losses of the parties by periods, then the real reasons for the defeats of the Wehrmacht will become clear!
      2. +2
        25 January 2023 23: 18
        It is for this reason that NO ONE IS IN A HURRY
        - Comrade Sun Tzu argued that it was impossible to drag out the war. It needs to be finished quickly. You will spend less resources, you will put less people. A long war is unprofitable for the belligerent state. Bad way to run. And we will not fight directly with NATO. Because we do not have enough human resources. As a last resort, nuclear weapons will be used. So that no one was offended.
        1. -3
          25 January 2023 23: 56
          Quote: Reklastik
          You will spend less resources, you will put less people. A long war is unprofitable for the belligerent state.

          You explain this to the Wehrmacht, in the period from 1.9.1931/22.6.1941/XNUMX to XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX.

          Quote: Reklastik
          Bad way to run.

          June - October 1941 suggests otherwise.


          Quote: Reklastik
          Because we do not have enough human resources. As a last resort, nuclear weapons will be used.

          We have enough natural and human resources - do not dramatize. The USSR was also given 3-4 months in the forty-first.

          Quote: Reklastik
          So that no one was offended.

          What is your resentment?
  4. +5
    25 January 2023 07: 33
    Although military science teaches that the best forms of combat are encirclement, bypass and encirclement. The thought of the need to form several tank and armies and 20-30 corps and divisions in order to carry out deep breakthroughs, apparently, did not reach.
    How tired of being reminded that now is not the last century and any major troop movements are perfectly tracked from space.
  5. +4
    25 January 2023 07: 56
    I still don’t understand, and why did Manstein still survive? Maybe due to the fact that ours ran out of steam destroying Paulus? I needed a break, that's the whole secret.
    1. +3
      25 January 2023 09: 42
      It is said that the armies were newly introduced, full-blooded. Low intellectual level, and the corresponding oak control system - that's the whole explanation. In defense, this is not so critical, well, but in the offensive - just grab your head.
      By the way, now in Ukraine, both sides continue to demonstrate this.
  6. Eug
    +2
    25 January 2023 08: 38
    For the first time I meet an adequate, as for me, assessment of Manstein's activities - a "strategic miracle." As for me, the "miracle" was still operational - the powerful movement of the Red (Soviet) Army in several directions was strategic. And the happiness of the USSR was that Comrade Stalin was at the head of the country, whose STRATEGIC genius eventually made it possible to defeat the OPERATIONAL geniuses of Guderian, Manstein, Model, Goth, Hube and other very highly professional military leaders of the Wehrmacht ...
    1. +2
      25 January 2023 10: 50
      And what did Comrade Stalin come up with that was so strategically brilliant?
      He was a good manager, he knew how to make his comrades work, though not as well as the local public believes, there was more than enough mess.
    2. 0
      25 January 2023 11: 33
      Quote: Eug
      For the first time I meet an adequate, as for me, assessment of Manstein's activities - a "strategic miracle." As for me, the "miracle" was still operational

      Pulling the 1st TA from the North Caucasus is not a strategic goal? If this maneuver does not work out, it is difficult to predict another development of events in the Army Group South zone other than complete collapse.
  7. +1
    25 January 2023 13: 25
    The difficulty in the battles for Kamensk was that they had to attack from the north and north-west, by forcing the Seversky Donets. The right bank of the Donets in relation to the left, from where the Soviet troops advanced, is located on a hill, and the city itself is pressed close to the river, which, moreover, has a rather large width (this is not the Don, but its main tributary in the Kamensk region is far from stream). Another factor - the offensive rested on the industrial zone, and these are not adobe-wooden houses, but brick and reinforced concrete, plus extensive underground floors. The maneuvers described by the author, of course, took place, but they were not the only ones that allowed the Germans to hold the city for more than a month. Kamensk was simply convenient to defend. There were many breakthroughs into the city, mainly by T-70 light tanks, which reached the railway station, trying to hold it, and even further - into residential buildings, but they burned like matches, and the attacks choked. By the way, one of the "seventies" still stands on the main city square of Labor, as a symbol of the battles for the city. It was the T-70s that made up the main striking power during the liberation of Kamensk with all the consequences. As a result, the city was completely liberated only on February 13, when the Germans were ordered to surrender Kamensk.
  8. +1
    25 January 2023 13: 32
    As for the battles at the "Sukhinichnaya Bulge", the author is disingenuous. The 3rd Panzer Army first participated in repelling the German offensive (Operation "Torch", i.e. "Smerch"), and then counterattacked. There, the Germans operated 4, 9, 11, 17, 18 and 19 tank divisions, 14 and 25 motorized divisions and at least 6 infantry divisions. Those. on a narrow sector of the front there were almost as many tank divisions as there were from Stalingrad to the Caucasus. And the fact that the German penetration did not exceed 10-12 km, and then the Germans were thrown back to their original lines, is worth a lot, since the German plan to encircle and destroy the troops of the left wing of the Western Front failed completely.
  9. -1
    25 January 2023 15: 59
    God grant you have time to learn how to fight before you have to butt heads with NATO battle groups and divisions.
    The author believes that the French, British, Belgians and others will fight much more skillfully and boldly than the Ukrainians and the Poles supporting them are fighting now?
    NATO is by and large a paper tiger.
  10. 0
    25 January 2023 16: 38
    For example, during the Kozelsk battle (counterattack of the left wing of the Western Front in the area of ​​Sukhinichi and Kozelsk - August-September 1942), the Soviet 3rd tank army, which received 510 tanks, lost 45% of its personnel and more than 50 % of combat vehicles, burned a bunch of ammunition and fuel, and recaptured an area 20 km wide and 7-8 km deep from the enemy.

    At the same time, the initial goal of the operation was just the encirclement of German forces: 3 TAs with 61 A and 16 A were supposed to cut the German wedge and form a cauldron with a blow towards each other.
    The thought of the need to form several tank and armies and 20-30 corps and divisions in order to carry out deep breakthroughs, apparently, did not reach. The command is obviously afraid to go for a deep breakthrough, after an unsuccessful blitzkrieg at the beginning of the campaign.

    Even if they did, these thoughts were discarded as unscientific fiction. For it is extremely difficult to dream about 20-30 divisions, having at your disposal only 25-30% of the strength of the ground forces. Moreover, the main problem, traditionally, with active bayonets - there are just enough commanders and staff.
  11. 0
    25 January 2023 19: 19
    As Czechoslovak officers, we studied at the same schools as Russian officers. But the technical level is really different, but it turns out that, after all, the theory and practical execution of combat are different values. I like the discussion of my colleagues more, because the article also provides high-quality examples of what a commander can do with combat weapons at his disposal, i.e. Air force. am
  12. +1
    26 January 2023 09: 31
    "It is worth noting that during the current Ukrainian campaign, Russian generals repeated these mistakes of the Soviet command. Intelligence failed. The interaction of forces and combat arms is poor. Command and communications are unsatisfactory. The strongest fortified areas of the enemy are storming in the forehead." Aha! And how did our intelligence work near Kharkov! I don’t want to pour out poison, but our intelligence is of no use - whole echelons of equipment are being transported to the front, and not a single one has been destroyed ... And this is an indicator of the work of intelligence
    1. 0
      23 March 2023 11: 55
      \roosei\ The operation began according to all the canons of the Soviet doctrine of warfare (although an incident - someone forbade hitting showrooms and bridges) two main attacks from the north to Kiev and from the south - the capture of the ezrodrom near Kiev - a walk with almost no resistance from the stunned enemy and Kherson. .Maximum more a week and everything to the east of the Dnieper is surrounded, just finish off the fans .. And here again the dirt from Moscow .. military operations are frozen and a minor Jew is going to Istanbul, and with the bank, in general, some unpleasant personalities, most of them are descendants of immigrants from the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea or in general In the dark age of the Khazar dominion and the agreed-northern ones, in general, foolishly went to the territory of the Russian Federation, and the southern ones, after stubborn resistance to Moscow, left Kherson - this is how the results of the spring-summer of 2022 look from the sofa squeezed through.
  13. +1
    26 January 2023 16: 08
    Shaw, did he save the whole army, or only the one that they could not catch up with?
  14. 0
    3 February 2023 18: 33
    did not use the scope, bypass and surround capabilities.
    In fact, then there was a continuous line of contact. And to get around, you still had to go on the forehead. And only after breaking through the defenses, the option of bypassing and encircling was possible.
    In general, the lessons will be difficult. God grant you have time to learn how to fight before you have to butt heads with NATO battle groups and divisions.
    Where did the author go? You need to periodically recall the title of the material so as not to get carried away in fantasy.
  15. -2
    12 February 2023 19: 24
    It is worth noting that during the current Ukrainian campaign, Russian generals repeated these mistakes of the Soviet command. Exploration failed. The interaction of forces and combat arms is poor. Management and communications are unsatisfactory. The most powerful fortified areas of the enemy are storming in the forehead. Although military science teaches that the best forms of combat are encirclement, bypass and encirclement. The thought of the need to form several tank and armies and 20-30 corps and divisions in order to carry out deep breakthroughs, apparently, did not reach. The command is obviously afraid to go for a deep breakthrough, after an unsuccessful blitzkrieg at the beginning of the campaign. Since they can only attack in company battalion groups. In general, the lessons will be difficult. God grant you have time to learn how to fight before you have to butt heads with NATO battle groups and divisions.


    In less than a year, more enemies have been slaughtered than NATO has in all of Europe. Without noise, cod and unnecessary losses ... What breakthroughs? For what?
  16. -2
    12 February 2023 19: 27
    Yes, the only thing the Germans knew how to do well was to drape. Draped from emerging boilers so that only the heels sparkled, demonstrating the best ability to drape of all times and peoples. Speed ​​drape champions, for sure.
  17. 0
    23 March 2023 11: 40
    Something on the resource often began to lick the commanders of the Wehrmacht ... How "great and smart" they are .. Forgetting the American meme - smart, but why so poor (surrendered)
    1. 0
      April 11 2023 08: 02
      Manstein is great. Sarcasm. He saved everyone, Russian Ivanov dispersed everyone. Only as a result he had to write about the lost victories. And hang all your failures on the possessed corporal. And the latter then sent him reserves on demand. And not what a thread with the world on a thread, but quite a complete tank and motorized divisions. His capture of the Crimea is to a greater extent a miscalculation of the command of the Red Army, headed by Kozlov and Mehlis. An attempt to release 6A Paulus, fighting on the Myshkova River. Again, Kursk 43, Kyiv 43, where he showed himself not in the best way. As a result of all these rescues, he was sent to write the initial chapters of his lost victories.))))
  18. +1
    April 14 2023 06: 53
    The author retells Manstein's book using his own logic and conclusions.
    OK

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"