Military Review

Sovereign Russia and our sovereignty

41
Sovereign Russia and our sovereignty



We built, but not yet built


Let me remind you that we were talking, first of all, about the Constitution, which has a national idea and presents an image of the future. The image of the Russia that we want to build and leave to our grandchildren. As for the current and already amended Constitution of the Russian Federation, as it became known, it was not only Sergei Shakhrai who wrote it.

Sergei Mikhailovich himself identifies two main authors of the constitution - himself and Sergei Alekseev. The constitution, he said, was also helped to develop by members of the Rule of Law project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development - USAID.


What is interesting: Online USAID lists XNUMX NGOs in Russia that interact with them. Among these thousands there are so-called "socially oriented NGOs". They are not subject to the Foreign Agents Act, meaning they continue to receive foreign funding and do not receive "foreign agent" status. Cleverly thought out!

I note that amendments were made to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020. Then the speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Kamchatka, Valery Raenko, emphasized that

“Many norms of the Constitution were written under the dictation of American advisers who flooded the Kremlin. It was their efforts that inspired the society with the idea that the Constitution is such a “holy scripture” that cannot be touched and revised.”

This summer, Russian President Vladimir Putin, at a meeting with young entrepreneurs, said:

“The world is changing, and changing rapidly. And in order to claim some kind of leadership, I’m not even talking about global leadership, but at least in something, of course, any country, any people, any ethnic group must ensure its sovereignty ... Because there is no intermediate states: either the country is sovereign, or a colony, whatever the name of the colonies.

Later, in October, Vladimir Putin, at a meeting with laureates and finalists of the all-Russian Teacher of the Year competition, as well as school teachers participating in the TV show Cool Theme, said:

“I emphasize that Russia has been and will be sovereign, for this now, at a turning point in the development of both our country and the whole world, it is necessary to strengthen, build a sovereign national system of education and upbringing of the younger generation, ensure the connectedness, unity of the educational space of the country. And above all, it is necessary to convey to the children the moral, cultural code of our people, to exclude any attempts to impose on children alien values, a perverted interpretation stories».

When we leave, we don't leave


Everything is good and right. But personally, it is not clear to me why our sovereign state is still a member of the WHO, the WTO and the IMF. Let me remind you that back in April 2022, State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin instructed relevant committees and the Government of the Russian Federation to study the question of the advisability of Russia's presence in these organizations.


Nearly 150 signatures were collected last year by concerned citizens for an online petition calling for Russia to withdraw from the WHO. As you can see, the Russians are ready to part with the WHO. But! The Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation are against. Why? Well, I can't say for sure. Don't want to break with such "cool" international organizations?

But in 2019, WHO approved the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which completely normalized transsexualism. Yes, Russia does not want to use this classifier, where pedophilia is introduced into the category of the norm. But the fact is that we do not have a native classification of diseases. As academician Zverev said, in 1970 at the WHO World Assembly, held in Alma-Ata, it was stated that the Soviet health care system is the best in the world, and everyone should take an example from it.

More than half a century has passed since then. What is the state of medicine in our country today? We have been optimized. In 2021 alone, the number of outpatient clinics in Russia decreased by 1,3 thousand. Over the past two years, excess mortality in the Russian Federation has exceeded one and a half million people. We are lagging behind in pharmacology and biotechnology.

By the way, more precisely - not quite by the way, the draft law "On the federal budget" provides for a reduction in health care spending in 2023 by 6,6% in nominal terms and by 9,8% in real terms (1,4 trillion rubles). As in any capitalist society, concern for human health is the business of the individual himself, the state is not involved here. If a person has no money for treatment in a paid clinic, then he himself is to blame, no one else. This is the kind of medicine we have. While the sovereign...

But the fact is that WHO is preparing the so-called Pandemic Agreement, which should be ready soon. According to him, the WHO may become the only organization in the world that has the right to announce the onset of another "pandemic". But the main thing is that it provides for the abolition of the rule of human rights in the event of the onset of "pandemic" regimes and emergencies.

That is, the leadership of the WHO, and not the leadership of the country, will be the main one. Also, this agreement gives NGOs and other undefined structures the right to participate on an equal basis with states in the establishment of international laws.

De jure - not yet de facto


As you can see, we are talking about an agreement that will legally secure the right of a narrow elite circle of people who adhere to a eugenic worldview to concentrate significant power in their hands and determine the goals and objectives of world medicine. A new medical order will be created in which Russia will lose the right to protect its security. If the Russian Federation remains in the WHO, it will lose its sovereignty.

As for the IMF, Russia has not taken loans from the IMF for a long time, but its influence on the Russian economy is still great. Fund employees meet with our officials and give advice that is binding. So, it was the IMF that recommended the Russian government to raise the retirement age.

Which was quickly done. What about the budget rule? It was dragged again by our "sovereign" Ministry of Finance. And the idea of ​​this rule was born in the IMF. Its essence is that not all the proceeds from the sale of oil will go to the development of our economy. True, now the cut-off price has changed. If earlier the money received from the sale of oil over $45 per barrel was used as a stash, now the cut-off price is about $60 per barrel.

The current rule is softer than the old one. But the essence has not changed: money cannot be spent on the development of Russia from the sale of resources of the Russian Federation! Remember where the oil money went, all the money, after our economy was modestly earning only about $45 a barrel? Well, all the excess profits actually went abroad: to buy American and European securities. And where is all this money now? We have arrested about 300 billion dollars.

But that is not all. Spydell finance provides the following data on the export of capital from Russia last year. If unfriendly countries simply refused to pay Russia's debts, then our monetary authorities, contrary to the decrees of the President, did not put any obstacles in servicing and repaying the obligations of our enterprises to creditors from unfriendly countries.

As a result, following the transfer of 300 billion dollars of state reserves to the enemy, they allowed private individuals to take out another half of this amount in the same direction. I'm not even talking about the fact that there was no nationalization of the property of companies that left Russia. So is Russia sovereign in its economic policy - that is the question! And then what does it mean to be a sovereign country!

The updated Constitution can provide answers to these questions.
Author:
Photos used:
nameorigin.ru, bdfclub.com, universe-tss.su
41 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Doccor18
    Doccor18 21 January 2023 05: 01
    +14
    And then what does it mean to be a sovereign country!

    In a world where capital rules, the sovereignty of states is relegated to the background. The owners of capital decide everything, no matter what country they are from ...
    1. 2 Level Advisor
      2 Level Advisor 21 January 2023 06: 58
      +6
      I agree with you .. Not a single truly sovereign country in our time simply exists .. except perhaps the DPRK and Iran .. and then - conditionally, they still depend on someone ..
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 21 January 2023 08: 38
        -11
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        Not a single truly sovereign country in our time simply exists ..

        Russia is consistently moving towards sovereignty, incl. and financial.

        Valdai Forum

        "... sovereign development must be ensured for all countries, and the choice of any country must be respected. This is also important, even in relation to the financial system. It must be independent, depoliticized, and, of course, it must be based on financial systems leading countries of the world...

        Tasks for the Russian government for 2023

        "... The work of our financial system should provide for those needs that were previously covered by Western sources of financing, including trade and project financing ..."

        Mishustin detailed, the ministers began to implement.
        There are those who sabotage? Yes - Manturov dr.

        ps
        The primary task set by Lenin for Dzerzhinsky is the fight against sabotage.
        1. Scientist
          Scientist 21 January 2023 10: 58
          +4
          That's what the conversation is about. You call it sabotage, but they call it the fulfillment of international obligations and the Constitution. To fight, you need a sovereign constitution and laws.
          1. AUL
            AUL 21 January 2023 12: 14
            +7
            Is another constitutional change in preparation? To, under the brand of exit from the WHO, WTO and IMF, slowly push through the next zeroing, etc.?
            1. Akuzenka
              Akuzenka 22 January 2023 20: 17
              0
              Is another constitutional change in preparation? To, under the brand of exit from the WHO, WTO and IMF, slowly push through the next zeroing, etc.?
              I think you're overly optimistic. Most likely we are talking about, under the brand name of "increasing sovereignty", the usual surrender of the Russian Federation, in return for saving accounts. They will split it up into "bandustans", put in "independent" rulers. And then lose both children and bills, and then lives. True, we are eliminated earlier. By the hands of those who were promised to keep accounts. I just don't believe that the "elite" of the Russian Federation can act in the interests of the country. All her previous actions indicate the opposite.
          2. runway-1
            runway-1 21 January 2023 21: 27
            +3
            To fight you need a sovereign constitution and laws
            And all business something?! After all, our Constitution has been "edited" more than once, and laws are generally adopted and edited without counting. Maybe something needs to be changed at the Conservatory?! winked
        2. 2 Level Advisor
          2 Level Advisor 21 January 2023 14: 09
          +3
          it was said and you can say a lot and different things .. and words from deeds, how do they differ? by the fact that this is how it will be done, then it means it has already happened .. but for now, this is a declaration of intent - no more .. that is, letters printed in the minutes of the meeting - letters on paper ..
      2. dorz
        dorz 21 January 2023 14: 22
        +2
        He either has sovereignty or he doesn't. The net outflow of capital from the Russian Federation by the end of the year exceeded 220 billion non-sovereign US dollars.
  2. Virus-free crown
    Virus-free crown 21 January 2023 05: 44
    +8
    But that is not all. Spydell finance provides the following data on the export of capital from Russia last year.

    Well, what kind of pennies can they bring if the Central Bank has OFFICIALLY allowed to withdraw from Russia 1 mullion of spring greens per month for one private person !!!!!!!!! laughing
  3. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 21 January 2023 06: 03
    +2
    So is Russia sovereign in its economic policy - that is the question! And then what does it mean to be a sovereign country!

    No, of course ... just look at the activities of the oligarch Abramovich to understand this. request
  4. Nikolay Malyugin
    Nikolay Malyugin 21 January 2023 06: 13
    +7
    Sovereignty sounds nice. But is it always the security of the state? Now the number of countries in the world has multiplied. And they all proudly talk about their independence. It is beneficial for real countries with economic and military power. On June 12, 1990, having signed sovereignty, has Russia become stronger? No. The destruction of the USSR was simply supposed. And there is even talk of the Third Rome. Ancient Rome therefore became an empire, because it surpassed the surrounding world in all respects. This is science, engineering, and so on.
    1. Scientist
      Scientist 21 January 2023 11: 07
      +4
      Sovereignty is ALWAYS the basis of state security. REAL sovereignty, not the one on paper. Although real sovereignty also depends heavily on signed and implemented agreements.
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 21 January 2023 06: 16
    +7
    A lot of questions: Who is preventing the adoption of a new Constitution? Why did you join the IMF in 1992? To the WTO in 2012? By the way, Ukraine and Georgia prevented Russia from joining the WTO, with WHO, of course, the heavy legacy of the Soviet regime, entered under Stalin, left under Stalin, returned again under Khrushchev in 1955 .. If the Americans wrote the Constitution, do not accept the amendments, but cancel, write their own, sovereign?
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 21 January 2023 09: 16
      -3
      Quote: parusnik
      Who is preventing the adoption of a new Constitution?

      The absence of the law "On the Constitutional Assembly", the adoption of which is ignored by the Dumas of all convocations.
      1. runway-1
        runway-1 21 January 2023 21: 30
        +3
        Boris Leontievich!
        Do you really take the participants in the discussion for idiots or are you just mocking with your similar comments?!
        1. SavranP
          SavranP 22 January 2023 17: 30
          +1
          What exactly annoyed you? The law "On the Constitutional Assembly", as far as is known, was still being adopted in the empire (under the tsar). Has it already been accepted? I think that it is more important to decide on the structure of state power. The division of state power into three branches no longer gives a result that satisfies society (people, nation). The principle of competition does not work sufficiently. Not only in Russia, but also in the states of Europe, America ... We need a superstructure over the branches, which would control not the budget of the state (country), but the financial expenses of the branches (the costs of maintaining each of the branches). Accordingly, the superstructure could determine the efficiency of each branch and draw conclusions, for example, for a referendum.
        2. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 22 January 2023 20: 20
          0
          Do you really take the participants in the discussion for idiots or are you just mocking with your similar comments?!
          Unfortunately, he does not scoff. Read the history of the issue. Everything is in the public domain.
          1. runway-1
            runway-1 22 January 2023 21: 15
            +1
            They write:
            The absence of a law "On the Constitutional Assembly", the adoption of which is ignored by the Dumas of all convocations
            The Duma can ignore the adoption of the law in opposition to the Government and even more so to the President???
  6. ivan2022
    ivan2022 21 January 2023 06: 38
    +11
    China, Vietnam and others received sovereignty only thanks to the existence of the USSR. In the USSR, they blew their country, exchanging its sovereignty for personal fortunes. And now they can lose it...

    .Our politicians and "captains of business" follow the path of "Grandmaster O. Bender", robbed by Romanian border guards. Despite the cool "multi-move".

    If a society cannot cope with its thieves and traitors, it perishes.
  7. awdrgy
    awdrgy 21 January 2023 07: 24
    +1
    So is Russia sovereign in its economic policy - that is the question!
    Well, you already answered
  8. Million
    Million 21 January 2023 08: 33
    +9
    So, it was the IMF that recommended the Russian government to raise the retirement age.
    What was quickly done

    Well, what kind of sovereign country is Russia?
    Putin's words are often at odds with deeds.
    1. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 22 January 2023 20: 22
      +2
      Putin's words are often at odds with deeds.
      This is the art of politics. Promise so that they believe, and then do what is beneficial to the owner.
  9. Maks1995
    Maks1995 21 January 2023 09: 14
    +9
    It's a little funny when they start talking about sovereignty and the constitution, citing the Supreme.
    The constitution - like words - is nothing, in fact.
    Rules of the game - business - everything.
    Words can promise everything: the Moon by 2015, free Wi-Fi in every transport, we will not attack, we will not mobilize, the borders of the Krajina will not change - and all with impunity.

    And the deeds speak for themselves: the moon is not expected, Wi-Fi is rumored to be only in Moscow, they attacked (Ukrainians according to Goblin), mobilized, attached ....

    And the same people who took money over the hill and kept children there are now ardent Western-haters in words ... but in reality they happily supply oil to NATO so that it can supply fuel to the Armed Forces of Ukraine ..

    Alas.
  10. ivan2022
    ivan2022 21 January 2023 10: 08
    +5
    There are, as it were, two Russias.

    In one, sovereignty is replaced by attributes of sovereignty.
    It is useful for the author to read an article about the CARGO cult of the aircraft worshiping tribes of Melanesia.

    Everything is exactly the same., like those Papuans ... The Constitution lies on the shelf, and the White House and the Senate and the Governors, and there are even "primaries" .. a bunch of parties, .. ... Like real "white people". but in fact, the Tsar, who is elected for life, as Mikhail Romanov and the royal boyars and even the "royal wolves" were elected in the 17th century ....

    And the other Russia is the All-Russian Congress of People's Deputies shot in October 1993 from tanks. Political prisoners in the zones. Donbas resistance.
    Scientists and real heroes.
    Not thick yet.....
    1. AdAstra
      AdAstra 21 January 2023 11: 39
      +2
      Here, you can’t write better + 100500 pluses hi
  11. AdAstra
    AdAstra 21 January 2023 11: 35
    +2
    If the author read the "updated" constitution, then there is no question of any sovereignty. Everything is the same only under the plaster of new empty phrases.
  12. gromit
    gromit 21 January 2023 12: 51
    +11
    Can't formulate a new "national idea"?
    So I'll help)

    In short, it’s necessary that it be as it is, so that it continues to be, and that the horses do not blather, but do what they say. And there are more of these, cops, priests and Cossacks for order. Cops like will work according to the law, and the Cossacks according to the concepts.
    In, you can still set up boys from the Caucasus as an example, like, look how you should respect your elders, and you don’t respect herax even for a bottle. But only so that if it’s for a bottle of some loshara, it’s so normal and correct, but finally you can’t.
    And like our Christianity and our Islam is, as it were, one religion, and if Christianity and Islam are not ours, then like these are other religions.

    And like, without a king, we can’t do anything, otherwise the country will fall apart. But he does not choose the king, but appears himself. Like all officials steal, but if the old king died, then a random official immediately becomes the king. And he does not steal right away, but only thinks about Russia. And he does not catch thieves, because he is kind.

    And so that if it’s even normal, it’s like a king, and if it’s a jamb, then it’s Americans. But so that even if it's a jamb, it's still not a jamb, because the tsar figured out the plan of the Americans.

    This is all beautifully arranged, stuffed with words about sovereignty, a special path, the memory of ancestors, a historical mission, the continuity of generations and there will be a suitable national idea.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 21 January 2023 13: 41
      -1
      All this is not original, you self-taught wit.
      1. gromit
        gromit 21 January 2023 14: 12
        +5
        With pleasure I will listen to real proposals for a new ideology.
        So far, all the articles read speak of a bad constitution written by the Americans, a terrible WHO and a powerful IMF that still rules Russia.
        Well, whining "it's a different matter in the Union .." so it's a must.

        Why don't you like my offer? In fact, how does it happen differently? I propose to simply formalize and accept that 70 years of socialism are loved like a nightmare.
        Orthodoxy, autocracy, denazification.
        Who does not like it - the borders are open.
        1. ivan2022
          ivan2022 21 January 2023 20: 24
          +4
          Whoever likes chatter about autocracy, I recommend finding data on the dollar to ruble exchange rate on the Web, at least from the beginning. 80 - ies, gold prices in dollars for the last 50 years. And strain to compare the average salaries and pensions in the USSR and in the Russian Federation. In gold equivalent.

          It turns out that we were shod about 2 times on average. Only on salaries and without taking into account Soviet social benefits. And this is the meaning of our great reforms.

          And if anyone thinks that 1991 happened in our history, so that he personally lives better ..... Let him go ... Through the forest.

          Yes, and according to international ratings of the standard of living, we moved down from 26th place in 1988, to places 60+ today ...

          As the saying goes: "free - will, but ........."
    2. Raccoon Raccoon
      Raccoon Raccoon 21 January 2023 19: 20
      0
      "... you should write books!" (With)
    3. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 22 January 2023 20: 26
      +3
      They formulated everything correctly, just to the top of the note. This is how they think of us. The division into classes has already taken shape, it remains to introduce estates. I'm actually surprised they haven't come out yet.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 21 January 2023 18: 11
    +4
    Under the current comprador power of home-grown bourgeois, there can be no question of any real sovereignty of Russia.
    A complete change of the system is needed, as the plumber said in a well-known anecdote. For the current government, this is like death.
  15. olgherd
    olgherd 21 January 2023 20: 51
    +6
    This thing is called double standards.
    If we are talking about the standard of living of ordinary people, about the responsibility of officials, about the social functions of the state, then this is all fu-fu-fu, the influence of the West that violates our sovereignty. But if it is necessary to raise gasoline prices, raise taxes, make paid medicine - then we immediately rely on foreign experience and the West - a role model.
  16. egorMTG
    egorMTG 21 January 2023 22: 53
    +1
    Quote: Doccor18
    And then what does it mean to be a sovereign country!

    In a world where capital rules, the sovereignty of states is relegated to the background. The owners of capital decide everything, no matter what country they are from ...


    - Yes, why So?!!!... - Maybe just Treason!?...
  17. egorMTG
    egorMTG 21 January 2023 23: 12
    0
    Quote: U. Cheny
    Sovereignty is ALWAYS the basis of state security. REAL sovereignty, not the one on paper. Although real sovereignty also depends heavily on signed and implemented agreements.


    - Now, just the very time (situation) when all the "agreements" can be dealt with once or twice! ....
  18. egorMTG
    egorMTG 21 January 2023 23: 29
    0
    Quote from Gromit
    Can't formulate a new "national idea"?
    So I'll help)

    In short, it’s necessary that it be as it is, so that it continues to be, and that the horses do not blather, but do what they say. And there are more of these, cops, priests and Cossacks for order. Cops like will work according to the law, and the Cossacks according to the concepts.
    In, you can still set up boys from the Caucasus as an example, like, look how you should respect your elders, and you don’t respect herax even for a bottle. But only so that if it’s for a bottle of some loshara, it’s so normal and correct, but finally you can’t.
    And like our Christianity and our Islam is, as it were, one religion, and if Christianity and Islam are not ours, then like these are other religions.

    And like, without a king, we can’t do anything, otherwise the country will fall apart. But he does not choose the king, but appears himself. Like all officials steal, but if the old king died, then a random official immediately becomes the king. And he does not steal right away, but only thinks about Russia. And he does not catch thieves, because he is kind.

    And so that if it’s even normal, it’s like a king, and if it’s a jamb, then it’s Americans. But so that even if it's a jamb, it's still not a jamb, because the tsar figured out the plan of the Americans.

    This is all beautifully arranged, stuffed with words about sovereignty, a special path, the memory of ancestors, a historical mission, the continuity of generations and there will be a suitable national idea.


    - And if it's even shorter: - we are sharply increasing the allocations (we are investing) to strengthen the supporting plankton ... we are strengthening the Inviolability of Stability, understand ... And We Will Be Happy! ...
  19. nickname7
    nickname7 22 January 2023 09: 53
    +6
    The updated Constitution can provide answers to these questions.

    All the fuss around the constitution was to cover the zeroing of terms.
    Such white noise, while they are pounding water in a mortar, but sovereignty has not increased, but the term has been reset to zero. laughing
    It's not about the constitution, but about the goal-setting of the elites, while they are busy exporting from oil to gold.
  20. egorMTG
    egorMTG 22 January 2023 18: 34
    0
    Quote: Boris55
    Quote: parusnik
    Who is preventing the adoption of a new Constitution?

    The absence of the law "On the Constitutional Assembly", the adoption of which is ignored by the Dumas of all convocations.


    - "The Law on the Constitutional Assembly" is a small, but step towards democracy ... Chur ... Chur - we are from this! ...
  21. egorMTG
    egorMTG 22 January 2023 18: 59
    0
    Quote: SavranP
    What exactly annoyed you? The law "On the Constitutional Assembly", as far as is known, was still being adopted in the empire (under the tsar). Has it already been accepted? I think that it is more important to decide on the structure of state power. The division of state power into three branches no longer gives a result that satisfies society (people, nation). The principle of competition does not work sufficiently. Not only in Russia, but also in the states of Europe, America ... We need a superstructure over the branches, which would control not the budget of the state (country), but the financial expenses of the branches (the costs of maintaining each of the branches). Accordingly, the superstructure could determine the efficiency of each branch and draw conclusions, for example, for a referendum.


    - We need a Superstructure for the control of Everything!... - on behalf of the Society. Control of All Institutions of the State in the person of people who determine and lead certain Economic and Political directions in the development and existence of the country ...