The Metropolitan of the Russian Orthodox Church told the UN Security Council about the repressions of the Kyiv regime against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church

For the first time in stories Metropolitan of the Russian Orthodox Church Anthony made a statement at the UN Security Council on the situation in Ukraine related to the persecution of the Orthodox clergy of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Metropolitan Anthony of Volokolamsk (Sevryuk) heads the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate.

A special meeting of the UN Security Council on the issue of persecution of the church was convened on the initiative of the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN and the UN Security Council Vasily Nebenzya. On January 14, he requested the convocation of the Security Council, and on January 17, the UN Security Council met for a meeting.

Metropolitan Anthony's speech was devoted to the large-scale repressions unfolding in Ukraine against the Orthodox clergy. In an effort to break all historical, cultural and even religious ties with Russia, the Kyiv regime began to persecute the clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. Thus, a number of high-ranking clergy were deprived of Ukrainian citizenship. Sanctions were also imposed against representatives of the Orthodox clergy, and searches were carried out in a number of monasteries.

Metropolitan Anthony described what is happening as a manifestation of political repression, which contradicts, among other things, the Ukrainian constitution itself. As the clergyman noted, the lists of those representatives of the clergy who should be subjected to repression are compiled in the apparatus of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine without trial or investigation. It is also contrary to normal practice, since the clergy are deprived of the opportunity to protest the sanctions imposed against them.

The policy of persecution of the canonical UOC is carefully planned and thought out. Its task is to deprive the canonical church of the bulk of parishioners and property, which will facilitate the task of finally separating the Ukrainian population from Russia.

Comments

[Prisoner]

Of course, it is necessary to speak, but what's the point? "Do not throw beads in front of pigs" (c) The same case.

[megadeth]

All specialized and more or less significant committees, structures, etc. the UN is occupied by citizens of countries hostile to us (NATO) + chairman. The sense of self-preservation in these jackals is very well developed. It is not necessary to speak, but to inform and declare that if it does not stop, then this and that will happen. And besides the announcement of a preventive single or massive nuclear weapon, there is nothing more to scare the FSA mongrels. You can talk, but no one is listening to us anymore, we need to raise the stakes, no matter how much we want to. IMHO

[topol717]

Quote: megadeth

It is not necessary to speak, but to inform and declare that if it does not stop, then this and that will happen.

How are you. Our Foreign Ministry can only cause concern.
Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Defense Ministry cannot conduct a training launch of ICBMs from the Barents Sea with a target at a training ground, for example, in the Astrakhan region. Or at a training ground in the Arab Syrian Republic.

[Anachoret]

Historically, there were different confessions on the territory of Ukraine… Orthodox, Catholics and schismatics “Greek Catholics”, who were not recognized by either Orthodox or Catholics. They are essentially heretics for them)) there was no Eucharistic communion with them)))
How to make sure that heretics do not seem to be as such - to make heretics the bulk of believers in Ukraine, that is, Orthodox)
According to this recipe, the State Department first created the pseudo-Orthodox Sect of the Pope of Istanbul in the heresy of papism, and now they are trying to squeeze the Orthodox Church under this sect so that all the inhabitants of the country remain under heretics)
Zbigniew Brzezinski applauds standing in a coffin)
But the UN needs to talk about it all the time! This gives legal grounds for conducting an NWO from the point of view of international law. Since undisguised military, cultural and economic genocide is being carried out on the territory of the former Ukraine. Therefore, the saloreich must be destroyed and no intermediaries of the Medvedchuks are needed for this. Russian should be Russian, and not "other Russian" as Medvedchuk wants to sell it again. Having practically unlimited administrative resources when he was the head of Kuchma's administration and having a strong party in parliament, Medvedchuk did nothing for the Russian-speaking population, its culture and religion, to secure them legally!
Russian lands should be Russia, period!

[Ivan Ivanov]

And not only in the UN and not only about the problems of the Russian Orthodox Church. The crimes of the Kyiv regime should be discussed at any available venues, at the top twenty, at the top ten, at any summits and conferences, even at sporting events, as salo.re.ich does. A neutral community must be formed and dragged to our side, and allies and their own citizens must be mobilized. At the same time, it is necessary to emphasize the anti-colonial war so that the conflict is not considered local or personal. Otherwise, we will butt heads for years, at best. It is not clear why the representative of the ROC spoke only about the problems of the ROC, the move could have been stronger.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Anchorite

Medvedchuk did nothing for the Russian-speaking population, its culture and religion

All rightly said, I support and approve.
With respect.

[Lech from Android.]

The policy of persecution of the canonical UOC is carefully planned and thought out.

Well, still, all this is done according to the recipes of American advisers.
In the UN, the problems of the ROC do not concern anyone except Russia ... so the position of the traditional church there is worse than the governor's.

[Egeny]

Lyokha, "this is the position of the traditional church" - how is it?

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

What a twist.
Previously, among the priests, the Bolsheviks and Comrade were to blame for everything. Stalin at the head, which the ROC gathered in 1943.
And now also capitalists with fascists!
Or maybe something is wrong with the ROC?
A patriarch, for example, or exemption from taxes, the return of historical buildings, valuables, etc. to priests by the state.
In the church became the main question of enrichment. By any available means.
Here is the result. Priests will soon be trampled from everywhere.

[Monster_Fat]

And why do the holy fathers need property? They must, like "true fathers", reject "earthly riches", for the sake of "spiritual riches", be content with "faith", and in "rags girded with rope" wander and call people to repentance for their sins and instruct by their example, on the path true, indicated by the Savior in the New Testament ("Sermon on the Mount")

[Egeny]

"And why do the holy fathers need property?"
Weak man... even in a cassock.)

[Antey]

There we are talking about church property - temples, lands under them, icons, candles, all kinds of altar accessories. And the monks themselves have only personal items - clothes, glasses, toothbrushes, etc.

But I will tell you - by what court you judge, by such a court you will be judged; With what measure you use that measure, it will be measured to you.

[bober1982]

Quote: Monster_Fat

and in "rags girded with rope" to call people to repentance for their sins and instruct by their example on the true path

Why lead by example? This, so to speak, the Senate did not authorize.
Happy holiday, Epiphany Eve!

[Li17]

Recently, I listened to Vadim Karasev, political expert of the country, who assessed the fuss in the religious world of the country very negatively .... I liked his phrase, "Thank God I am an atheist." I know the subject, I had to communicate closely and observe the arts of the commissars from religion ..., I also somehow came to this, all these religions have nothing to do with God, the church is business and politics! And the disassembly just shows the insignificance of man in relation to the Divine Plan! In my opinion, a believer does not look at what and how is going on in these organizations, more than that, he is obliged not to throw money and boast of his hajjs, going to temples ... but to live according to the Laws that keep us from sins! And even more so, the clergy themselves should be an example in this! But in fact ...!!!!

[rotmistr60]

The policy of persecution of the canonical UOC is carefully planned and thought out.

Mainly those who sit in the UN Security Council. Therefore, during such performances, they defiantly pretend that they are very bored, and some also react boorishly to this. But since we are sitting on this platform, and firmly, then of course it is necessary to bring our point of view to events that primarily concern Russia.

[alexey_444]

Church and under Hitler in Ukraine was. Faith is long gone if the Pope urges Christmas not to turn into shopping. And people don’t care who serves the church, the main thing is that all services will be conducted for money. We don't need to worry. True believers will go underground as at the beginning of Soviet power, and the rest will not care, even though Satan will perform the funeral service, the main thing is to observe the rite.

[Hey]

Well, they complained, and then what? If you truly believe in God, then pray to him and ask for help from him, and do not run around organizations under the devil's control. By your behavior in the world and in the house of the Lord, you deserved that the Lord turned away from you. Many have become traders, they sell at railway stations and in china shops, icons and crosses, without any blessing, they sell places in cemeteries. And with the temples, what you are doing, then arrange a restaurant, then you want to make a pool. It is time for the Lord again to go through the house of his father, with a whip, and drive these merchants and drive them out.

[Magellan]

It is necessary to fix everything, for the subsequent demanded over the ukrov regime

[single-n]

Well. The flock thanked the shepherds. What was taught and received.

[I dare to_notice_]

I agree with many commentators.
But ...
What, besides Orthodoxy, does modern Russia offer some of its citizens as an ideological basis? It's at least something...
But this does not solve the main problem, because Russia is a multi-confessional state.
It saddens me that until now the elite of the Empire is not working to create an image of the future and offer an IDEOLOGY.
And the people who call for this, and who have something to offer, are still not in demand.

[Monster_Fat]

"State ideology: building a corruption-free society with equal rights for everyone, based on social justice and a socially just distribution of the social product. Basic laws: their adoption or changes only on the basis of a general referendum. Universal, direct suffrage and recall of those elected in case of failure to comply with them obligations assumed." - why not the ideology of the state? Ideology for society? Please: "Live and let live. Treat others the way you would like to be treated the same way." What else is needed? "Duginyatina with Ilyinism"? Or "solzhenitsizm"?

[ax1stoyn]

At the UN, it only makes sense to be in order to be in the news, so to speak.
In all other respects, this is a meaningless organization, as the Americans tell everyone to do it, they will do it, and no one will do anything, and there is no point in these speeches.

[Wayfarer_2]

It seems to me that the Orthodox in Ukraine deserved what is happening to them now. And the priests deserve them too. After all, it was they who did not rise up and did not prevent those misanthropes who seized power and killed people both in the Donbass and in Odessa. And the priests did not call on the flock to rise up and defend the faith. And now they themselves are trying to prove to the Banderaites that they have nothing to do with the Russian Orthodox Church. Didn't they understand what was going on? But there were no ascetics, defenders of the faith. So why are they surprised?