Archival footage of Russian bombers 'threat flight' over USS Queen Elizabeth shown

28
Archival footage of Russian bombers 'threat flight' over USS Queen Elizabeth shown

In Britain, a new film "The Warship: Tour of Duty" is scheduled to be shown, dedicated to the campaign of the aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth to Asia, which took place in 2021. In this regard, separate fragments of the film are published, in particular, an archival video of the "collision" of the ship with a group of Russian combat aircraft is shown.

It was a dramatic moment when a squadron of Russian bombers buzzed over HMS Queen Elizabeth in a menacing maneuver.

- noted in the publication The Sun.



As indicated, the incident occurred when the aircraft carrier was near the Suez Canal, heading to the Far East on a seven-month trip. Three Russian Su-24s, having taken off from a Syrian air base, were detected at a distance of 10 km, flying at an altitude of 2 km. From the aircraft carrier, their crews were sent a dangerous approach signal:

This is a coalition warship. Your actions seem threatening. Change course immediately, or I may take action against you.

Despite the warnings, the Russian bombers continued their movement and eventually flew over Queen Elizabeth.

To drive them away, F-35 stealth fighters were raised into the air from the British ship, and the crew went on full alert

- says the film.

Reportedly, another incident was the "pursuit" of the aircraft carrier by Russian ships:

HMS Portland [a frigate of the Type 23 project from the AUG security group] discovered the Admiral Gorshkov in the North Sea, a Russian warship with new, uninterceptable, hypersonic missiles flying at a speed of 11 thousand km / h. Portland followed him until he left for the Atlantic with great fanfare.

What does “with great fanfare” mean in this case is not specified.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    14 January 2023 15: 17
    Yes, these were all demonstrations from another era "before the NWO", so to speak ...
    1. +7
      14 January 2023 15: 25
      an archived video of the "collision" of the ship with a group of Russian combat aircraft is shown.
      Yeah ! "The battle was bloody, but the strongest won!" bully
      1. +7
        14 January 2023 16: 31
        Well, these bits have a heroic slogan:
        "... live together,
        play together
        And figure together!" angry
        That is, they played a little, and then fought, on camera. Showmustgowan....
        The main thing is not to forget to show a friendly booze at the end. Happyend, so to speak drinks ..., the way "Elizabeth" sails "into the sunset" was not enough for him.
  2. +1
    14 January 2023 15: 19
    This is a coalition warship. Your actions seem threatening. Change course immediately, or I may take action against you.

    Interestingly, ours are the same specific warnings do?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +14
    14 January 2023 15: 23
    Well, detection at 10 km is strong. They will detect anti-ship missiles after the explosion
    1. -19
      14 January 2023 15: 33
      In wartime, there would have been an on-duty pair of F-35s in the air, the trait of the bald Sushki would have come so close. As the SVO showed, all of our electronic warfare to them to one place - they lead almost from takeoff. Yes, and the aircraft carrier would be part of the support fleet.
      1. +14
        14 January 2023 15: 41
        As the Israelis will show well in wartime, they do not even enter Syrian airspace.
      2. +9
        14 January 2023 16: 00
        And why, Mig31K with daggers are deployed in Khmeimin!
        They don’t even need to fly up and let them intercept the rocket !!!
      3. +11
        14 January 2023 16: 01
        Quote from DMFalke
        there would be an on-duty pair of F-35s in the air

        And, is it like the most powerful locator in the world? Well, in wartime, at an altitude of 2 km, no one will fly, and the pair on duty with the locators turned on will gobble up the R-37 for 300 km into their turned-on locator.
        And so they are not standing in a port in Hawaii, but crawling in an area where every first person would like to drown them - that's simple, without exception, even Israel)))
      4. +2
        14 January 2023 17: 43
        But they flew 10 km, and this is from their aug, I think there should have been a couple of planes in the air. Otherwise, the meaning of all this aircraft carrier collection from aug? The British here notably crap themselves, especially with the Su 24))
      5. 0
        14 January 2023 20: 37
        Quote from DMFalke
        In wartime, there would have been an on-duty pair of F-35s in the air, the trait of the bald Sushki would have come so close. As the SVO showed, all of our electronic warfare to them to one place - they lead almost from takeoff. Yes, and the aircraft carrier would be part of the support fleet.

        In the case of an aircraft carrier and a fleet, the entire AUG, with the help of Gorshkov, will be deployed on targets far beyond the reach of their aircraft ...
    2. +3
      14 January 2023 16: 25
      Quote from Bingo
      Well, detection at 10 km is strong

      Very strange.
      Where were the Sea King ASaC mk7 AWACS helicopters?
      1. +3
        14 January 2023 20: 40
        Quote: Doccor18
        Quote from Bingo
        Well, detection at 10 km is strong

        Very strange.
        Where were the Sea King ASaC mk7 AWACS helicopters?

        Coffee break - coffee break...
      2. +2
        15 January 2023 00: 35
        Quote: Doccor18
        Where were the Sea King ASaC mk7 AWACS helicopters?

        Why, to detect targets at an altitude of 2000 m, an AWACS helicopter, if their ground / ship radar was supposed to be at a range of 200 - 250 km. discover? A range of 10 km ... this is for such a height exactly on the eve of entering the "dead funnel" (the zone of invisibility of the radar above itself).
  4. +4
    14 January 2023 15: 26
    It could be longer, but there is nothing to comment on.
  5. +8
    14 January 2023 15: 29
    From 10 km? They have become STEALTH???? It's nice that SU-24s are like that)
    1. +3
      14 January 2023 15: 36
      Haven't you heard? Instead of radars, they have watchmen with binoculars.
  6. +7
    14 January 2023 15: 43
    And what happened to the F 35 on takeoff? Did the ski jump fail? The pilot fired beautifully.
    1. +5
      14 January 2023 16: 01
      This is the incident when the British drowned the F35 in the Mediterranean Sea, sorry they were able to raise it!
    2. +2
      14 January 2023 20: 41
      Quote: tralflot1832
      And what happened to the F 35 on takeoff? Did the ski jump fail? The pilot fired beautifully.

      He better shoot himself...
  7. +8
    14 January 2023 15: 44
    Only those standing on the deck will see the real problem in the form of a warhead into the deck .... and they won’t have time to see it .... everything else is dancing with tambourines for suckers.
  8. +2
    14 January 2023 16: 04
    Promotional video "irons"
    1. +3
      14 January 2023 16: 13
      Let them better show the Prince of Wales when he lost his move !!!)))
  9. +2
    14 January 2023 16: 35
    This is what a big pump looks like in English.
    1. 0
      14 January 2023 20: 43
      Quote: tralflot1832
      This is what a big pump looks like in English.

      The "accompanying" trough must have been illuminated the entire route ...
  10. +4
    14 January 2023 17: 43
    Pass these drunk faces

    That I shook their Bigben.
    wassat
  11. 0
    14 January 2023 21: 19
    This is a coalition warship. Your actions seem threatening. Change course immediately, or I may take action against you.

    I remembered Mikhail Nikolaevich with his immortal
    The Americans (in a raised voice): CAPTAIN RICHARD JAMES HOWARD, COMMANDER OF USS LINCOLN, UNITED STATES NAVY, THE SECOND LARGEST WARSHIP IN THE AMERICAN NAVY, IS TALKING TO YOU. WE ARE ESCORTED BY 2 CRUISERS, 6 FIGHTERS, 4 SUBS AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT SHIPS. I DO NOT "ADVICE" YOU, I "ORDER" YOU TO CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES TO THE NORTH. OTHERWISE WE WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE THE NECESSARY MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR SHIP. PLEASE GET OFF OUR COURSE IMMEDIATELY!!!!

    Spanish: Juan Manuel Salas Alcantara is talking to you. We are two people. We are accompanied by our dog, dinner, 2 bottles of beer and a canary that is sleeping now. We are supported by the radio station "Cadena Dial de La Coruna" and channel 106 "Emergency at Sea". We are not going to turn anywhere, given that we are on land and are the A-853 lighthouse of the Finisterra Strait of the Galician coast of Spain. We have not the slightest idea what place we occupy in terms of size among the Spanish lighthouses. You may take whatever [censored] measures you deem necessary and do whatever you please to ensure the safety of your [censored] ship, which will be shattered on the rocks. So once again, we urge you to do the most sensible thing: change your course 15 degrees south to avoid a collision.
  12. -6
    14 January 2023 22: 01
    We just seemed to warn them, but they took and sank our cruiser MOSCOW ha ha