How did the Khmelnytsky uprising begin?

20
How did the Khmelnytsky uprising begin?
Joseph Brand. "Return of the winners (Cossack with a flag)"


General situation


The defeat of the anti-Polish uprisings of Pavlyuk, Ostryanin and Guni in 1637–1638 (The heavy defeat of the Cossacks Ostryanin and Guni in the Battle of Zhovnin and at the Starets) led to a sharp deterioration in the situation not only of ordinary Cossacks and peasants, but also registered Cossacks. The Warsaw Seim in 1638 adopted the "Ordination" on the new regime in Little Russia. The number of registered Cossacks was reduced to 6 thousand people. All others lost the right to be called Cossacks and turned into forced "claps" (draft cattle). Going to the Sich was punishable by death. Hetmans, foremen and other military positions became appointed rather than elected.



Crown troops were stationed in the Russian Ukraine, control was transferred to Polish officials. The Kodak fortress was restored, where 600 people of a good army were stationed. The fortifications were strengthened, a high shaft was poured. At a distance of 3 kilometers from the fortress, a watchtower was set up, from the top of which a large view was opened.

As a result, the “Ordination” of 1638 deprived the registrars of all the rights they had previously received and put them in full subordination to the officials appointed by the Sejm and the Polish government.

On November 24, 1638, the “final commission with the Cossacks” took place in the Maslov Stav tract. In the presence of N. Pototsky and other lords, a decree was announced, which stated, in particular, that the Cossacks "dutifully accept the well-deserved yoke on their necks." The nobleman P. Komarovsky was appointed commissioner of the register, I. Karaimovich and L. Bubnovsky were appointed military captains. Regimental captains and centurions were allowed to be elected by the Cossacks themselves. Among the elected were the Chigirinsky centurion Bogdan Khmelnitsky and Pereyaslavl Fyodor Lyutai.

10 years of "golden peace"


The brutal Polish terror reigned. As the Belgorod governors reported,

“their (Cossacks. - Approx. Aut.) violate the peasant faith, and the churches of God are destroyed, and they are beaten, and their wives and children, taking them to the mansions, they burn them and the food potion, poured into their bosoms, they light, and the nipples of the wives they were slaughtered, and their courts and every building were destroyed and plundered.

The Russian regions belonging to Poland were so sharply cleared and cut out that they calmed down for "10 golden years." But the people did not get better, only worse.

The Polish lords became convinced of their omnipotence and permissiveness, they became more and more impudent. The persecution of the Russian Church intensified. In the west of Little Russia, Orthodox were generally forbidden to join craft workshops, build houses in cities, speak in courts and trade. In official everyday life, the Russian language was supplanted, in all institutions they had to speak and write only in Polish. The last Orthodox magnates in Little Rus', led by Adam Kisel, agreed to submit to Rome and negotiated a new union.

Orthodox churches that stood on the land of the pans (the lands were given to the gentry) were considered the property of the pans. The Poles, mocking the Russians, rented them out to Jewish Jews. They also ascended, felt invulnerable. They offended the national and religious feelings of Russians. They argued and bargained whether to open the church for services and for what amount?

It is worth remembering that at that time the attitude towards churches and faith was different. People were ready to die and kill for their faith. Also, Jewish managers, tenants cleaned up trade, all profitable trades, soldered the population. Nepotism flourished. Where one sat down, his relatives, relatives, and comrades immediately appeared.

As a contemporary wrote:

“The Jews rented all the Cossack roads and set up three taverns on each mile, rented all the trading places and imposed a duty on every product, rented all the Cossack churches and took requisitions.”

Belief in the "Good King"


The people lived faith in the "good king" Vladislav IV. He was considered a friend and patron of the Cossacks. During the introduction of the "Ordination", the Cossack ambassadors tried to get help from the king.

But the king could not go against the Sejm and the magnates. The Cossacks need to obey, the king of the ambassadors urged, over time everything can change. The king himself needed help. The gentry did what they wanted, did not obey any royal decrees. The royal treasury was empty, he had nothing to support the army. Vladislav generally became a toy of magnates. The Sejm did not give money.

The dominance of the magnates and their henchmen led to the fact that even the petty gentry were completely defenseless. The nobles could ruin them with courts, smash the possessions with "arrivals" - send a detachment of their servants, often the same gentry, mercenaries, to an objectionable gentry. For example, the great crown hetman Konetspolsky rounded off his possessions with the help of a detachment of mercenaries Lash. He attacked villages and towns. Local residents were robbed, tortured and killed.

According to a contemporary, the wealthy South Russian pan Yerlich, the Lashchevites robbed on behalf of the petty gentry, subjected the gentry's wives and daughters to violence. For such crimes, Lashch was sentenced 236 times to bannitia (exile) and 37 times to infamia (deprivation of honor), but nevertheless, until the death of Koniecpolsky, he avoided punishment. So, mocking the helpless royal court, Lasch appeared at the court of Vladislav IV in clothes trimmed with court sentences condemning him.

The gentry was divided. Many resigned themselves to such lawlessness. They went to serve the big feudal lords. They gave beautiful wives and daughters to the "harems" of nobles. At rich courts, life was fun and satisfying. Others clung to "freedoms", believed that it was necessary to strengthen royal power. The king will ensure the rule of law, support the petty nobles.

Theoretically, there was such a possibility. For example, in France, the kings in the fight against large feudal lords relied on small nobles and cities. Thus a strong royal power and country was created. Vladislav welcomed such sentiments. Under him, a “royal” party was formed as opposed to the “pans”.


Grand Crown Chancellor Jerzy (Yuri) Ossolinsky (1595–1650). Hood. Bartholomew Strobel.

King and Khmelnitsky


Meanwhile, Venice turned to Poland. She offered to join an alliance against the Porte, promised to allocate large sums. The union supported the papacy. The king and chancellor Ossolinsky liked the idea. Poland was freed from tribute to the Crimean Khanate. The gentry received money, awards, booty and land. The king could strengthen the army. Also on the occupied lands to establish large royal fiefdoms.

But the "pansky" party did not need the war. The king could increase his power. The pans stubbornly opposed the project of war with Turkey, defeated all the plans of the king and all the preparations of Ossolinsky.

Then Vladislav and Ossolinsky conceived a cunning maneuver. Use the Cossacks, set them on the Crimea and Turkey. The Sultan will be angry, he will declare war. Poland will have to fight.

In April 1646, military captains Barabash, Karaimovich, regimental captains Nesterenko, Pest, Yatsko and Chigirinsky centurion Bogdan Khmelnitsky secretly arrived in Warsaw. The king took care of them, instructed them to build seagulls-ships, gather a large army and raid Turkish possessions. He issued a royal charter for this - “privilege”. True, in violation of the law, he sealed it not with the state, but with a personal seal. For faithful service, he promised to increase the registry by 2-3 times, withdraw the crown troops from the Russian Ukraine, and return the previous benefits.

Vladislav knew Khmelnitsky for a long time, since the time of the campaign against Moscow in 1618. He was a participant in anti-Polish uprisings, but managed to avoid reprisals and retained a prominent position. Khmelnitsky led detachments of Cossacks who successfully fought for France. The Cossack commander was ready to lead the campaign of the Cossacks against the Turks. It seemed that his dream was coming true - to organize a Cossack army, which could also be used against the pans. When the time came, Bogdan turned to Barabash that it was time to recruit Cossacks and build ships in Zaporozhye. And the registry foreman was in no hurry.

Other Cossack atamans were on their own minds. Barabash and Ilyash chose not a weak king, but a "gentry" party. They laid the plans of Vladislav to the Chigirinsky headman of Konetspolsky. The tycoons sniffed it out through other channels as well. A scandal erupted. At the Diet in November-December 1646, the king was forced to abandon the alliance with Venice, to cancel preparations for war.


King Vladislav IV Vasa (1595–1648). Unknown master, around 1645

Resentment of the Chigirinsky centurion


Khmelnitsky still tried to support the king and realize his plans. I went to visit Barabash, got him drunk and took the letter of privilege. Showing this letter to the Cossacks, he urged them to oppose the Ottomans. Barabash and Ilyash found out about this, got angry, quarreled with Khmelnitsky. Several times they tried to kill Bogdan. But he was lucky, good people helped.

The situation seemed convenient for the Chigirinsky underage Chaplinsky. He laid eyes on the village of Subbotov, which belonged to the centurion, and on his girlfriend. He turned to his boss, the headman of Chigirinsky, Alexander Konetspolsky, the son of the great crown hetman. Bogdan inherited Subbotov, but he had no official papers. Khmelnytsky tried to get the truth in court, he wrote to the king. Vladislav secured the farm for Bogdan, but the royal document did not help either.

Chaplinsky staged a "collision" that was usual for that time. With a detachment of servants, he flew into Saturdays. Bogdan was not at home. Everything was looted and destroyed. The son of Khmelnitsky was flogged and he died. The gentry took away Bogdan's girlfriend and took him as his wife.

Khmelnytsky filed a complaint with Koniecpolsky, but to no avail. Cossack went to court. The court ruled that the farm belongs to the headman, so the headman and the headman are free to dispose of it as they want. Bogdan remembered the "God's judgment" - he challenged Chaplinsky to a duel. But the gentry did not accept the challenge from the "muzhik", sent three mercenaries against him. Bogdan was nearly killed.

Angry Khmelnitsky went to Warsaw. A trial took place. Chaplinsky did not deny that he ordered Khmelnitsky's son to be whipped "for threats." But the boy died not from beatings, but by himself, three days later. Bogdan had no rights to the farm, so there was no robbery. And his wife was unmarried.

Khmelnytsky met with the king, but he waved him off. There were enough problems. He said, if you are a warrior, then deal with things yourself, Polish laws are very loose in this regard. True, Vladislav still hoped for the Cossacks, wrote out a new letter, gave money for boats.

The offended and furious Cossack no longer believed the king, he conceived something else. On the way from Warsaw, he showed privileges and urged people to take on weapon - so far for the king, against the pans. Thus began the Russian people's liberation war.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    16 January 2023 06: 17
    Today in Ukraine, B. Khmelnitsky, who fought against the Polonization and Catholicization of the inhabitants of Ukraine, would be recorded as "Kremlin agents" with all the ensuing consequences.
    The persecution of the Russian Church intensified. In official use, the Russian language was supplanted

    In less than four hundred years, persecution of both Orthodoxy and the Russian language began again in Ukraine. Only now it is not the Poles who are doing this, but the descendants of those who fought under the banner of Khmelnitsky. Why are they doing that ? And they wanted to get a thicker piece of sausage from Europe and lace panties to boot. For such things, they are ready to give up their native language, and the faith of their ancestors.
    1. +4
      16 January 2023 09: 36
      Quote: Comrade
      Only now it is not the Poles who are doing this, but the descendants of those who fought under the banner of Khmelnitsky. Why are they doing that ?

      Exactly for what they did it for and then - for good food and power
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +4
    16 January 2023 07: 17
    Russian People's War...
    The non-brothers will correct)))
    1. +3
      16 January 2023 22: 16
      "Have you forgotten what a saber is and how your ancestors got fame and privileges with it?"
      - so, according to legend, the king answered Khmelnitsky's pleas for intercession and justice.
  3. -3
    16 January 2023 11: 29
    If we compare those events in Ukraine with the current ones, then classical, scientific history rubs us in that BH is an analogue of the LDNR battalion commanders like Givi; although it’s a no brainer that the level of his competencies is in no way lower than the gene. Surovikina: the defeat of the regulars is a scientific school with all the attributes (planning skills, supplies, repairs, etc.). in general, there are a sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbquestions on which "science" will babble in style; they offended the tradesman, they took away the shirts, they killed their son, so he ...
    In general, in this article, not a single paragraph of the text is compatible with others; the impression that some picture was cut into puzzles, mixed and given a rebus house.
    Why, when Vladislav Dmitrievich was alive, the Cossacks only rebelled and resented the dominance of the European nobility, and when the krul died, the reconquista began with total extermination and denazification? Where did the half-naked and untrained rednecks get unlimited supplies of gunpowder and lead (according to "scientific" nonsense, the "rebellious" Cossacks never lacked them)?
    1. +2
      16 January 2023 11: 54
      Quote: Ivan Onya
      that BH is an analogue of LDNR battalion commanders like Givi

      No, rather Khodakovsky, who then was in real power, what now ...
    2. +1
      16 January 2023 21: 51
      Interesting questions you asked...
      I will try to answer.
      Let's start with
      offended the tradesman
      .
      Bogdan Zinovy ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbwas not a "philistine" in any way.
      Cossack centurion \ colonel, as you yourself correctly noted, the level is higher than that of the field commander, even in terms of influence.
      And they dared to "offend" him only in his absence, that is, completely dishonorable.
      To use the terminology of another time, he was a knight in the court of his king.
      Agree, with honor and a sense of duty, these comrades were all right.
      By the way, he went on a campaign against Moscow at the age of 22, as a soldier of his king.
      Who stomped to sit on the Russian throne promised to him. ("thanks to the Seven Boyars")
      half-naked and untrained bastards
      I will not pretend to be an expert, but in those years they came to the war with a small part - regular troops and "conscripts".
      Bogdan is about the same. The backbone of his troops is "registered Cossacks". I don’t remember how many of them were on the salary of Vladislav the 4th, after the Pereyaslav Rada, Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich enlisted 60 thousand registered Cossacks for allowance.
      Those. Bogdan had no problems with "whom to fight".
      And as for gunpowder and lead ... Then, as I suppose, these stocks, like food, could be got hold of in every maetka, on the path of the Cossack uprising.
      Convoys of defeated Polish troops.
      Tatars with Turks. Which, as we remember, were not just allies, but together with Bogdan participated in the last unsuccessful battle.
      I think gunpowder and lead could be bought from the Poles themselves, knowing that they definitely did not have unity.
      1. -1
        17 January 2023 23: 41
        Thanks for the reply.
        Actually, the question was not about the tradesman or gunpowder / lead. There is an interesting reading on the net, namely, somehow stroim-posledovatelnuyu-versiyu-istorii-16-18-vekov-aleksandr-kas. The author was bold in sources and conclusions - for example, that Only Vladislav had the right to the Moscow table and so on, not because of the "7th boyars" (frankly rare jokers insinuate this wildness). according to the text, V. died neatly by 1648, and this event gave Mikhail Fedorovich the right to demand from the gentry the return of the land allotment that ceased to belong to them on the right hand from the river to the English Channel. This version of the story is much more entertaining than the classical version.
        As for the Subbotin farm, this is ridiculous; akin to the assumption that the Bolsheviks in 1917 overthrew the provisional ones only in order to electrify the country of the Soviets.
    3. +3
      17 January 2023 11: 12
      Black powder was ground in powder mills, bullets were poured into each regiment, or even a hundred. The marchers followed the army, and no one canceled the robbery. Regarding the competence of the command: my ancestor, a Jew, having been baptized, became first a centurion, and then a colonel: he was a competent rich merchant. The war moved the talented and the young, as it always does: take the French Revolution, for example, what commanders it put forward from the common people: Napoleon, Ney, Murat, Zhuber ...
    4. 0
      17 January 2023 19: 18
      Well, I can assume humanitarian aid from Moscow. As well as the presence of trophies and dissatisfied / sympathizers. I heard about the lawlessness of the magnates and the lack of rights of the kings of Poland, but I did not think that it was so much.
  4. +3
    16 January 2023 14: 17
    Also, Jewish managers, tenants cleaned up trade, all profitable trades, soldered the population. Nepotism flourished. Where one sat down, his relatives, relatives, and comrades immediately appeared ... Jews were all ... roads were rented and three taverns were set up on every mile, all trading places were rented ...
    So 400 years have passed, but nothing has changed! Why is that?
    1. -1
      16 January 2023 21: 57
      So why are you so...
      Go to church for free!
      And the fact that it is impossible to live with dignity in the richest country.
      Well, another 400 should pass, you see.
      In general, that period of Polish history has common features with our day today, and the latest Ukrainian history will be reflected in many as in a crooked mirror
    2. +4
      17 January 2023 02: 51
      Quote: flSergius
      400 years have passed and nothing has changed!

      How has this not changed?
      The last two presidents of Ukraine are Jews, almost all of them are oligarchs.
  5. +3
    16 January 2023 21: 06
    Read ...
    There was a sincere desire to shake hands with the author.
    Everything is just like that. Described easily and in strict accordance with historical facts.
    My distant ancestor, Martyn Nebaba, is an associate of Bogdan Zinovy.
    The author did not mention that before Bogdan, letters of reunification with Orthodox Muscovy-Rus were also submitted by his predecessors.
    Chaplinsky with a local boss, should become Poland's national anti-heroes
    Because of the greed of one degenerate who wanted three other people's barn and a mistress, the Poles first lost a lot of people irretrievably and immediately.
    We lost first territories, then the country for centuries and the chance to become the largest European power - forever.
    And the price of all these losses is the Saturday farm
    About the weakness of the King, they also correctly mentioned.
    Trembling before his magnates, the king mockingly offered Bogdan to achieve justice with his saber ...
    To everyone who is interested in these events, I recommend watching the Polish film "With Fire and Sword" based on the novel by Sienkiewicz
  6. -3
    16 January 2023 23: 13
    It is interesting but not clear what "Russian Ukraine" and "Russian regions within Poland" are? It is necessary to wind into the future to navigate according to the maps of the USSR or into the past. Why can't you call a spade a spade as it was called in the 17th century? Khmelnitsky himself suspected that he was living in Russian Poland under Catherine II? :)
  7. 0
    16 January 2023 23: 33
    The most interesting is the painting by Józef Brand. "Return of the winners (Cossack with a flag)." Jozef Brand Polish realist painter 19th-20th century. Here, on the right, the Cossack holds a standard with a crescent, and not an eight-pointed Greek cross. If they had not signed that they were Cossacks, then I would have thought the Ottomans, i.e. Turks.
    So what religion did the Catholics oppress, by any chance not the Mohammedan "Turkish law"?
    1. 0
      17 January 2023 19: 26
      He is an artist, he sees it that way or an order.
      And in general, the Orthodox are more than tolerant of Islam. In Spain, Sicily is left of Islam: only architecture, brown skin and names.
      In Greece, Bulgaria, Armenia, Syria, they remained both Orthodox under Islam, and vice versa under Christianity.
  8. 0
    18 January 2023 00: 08
    But the king could not go against the Sejm and the magnates. The Cossacks need to obey, the king of the ambassadors urged, over time everything can change. The king himself needed help. The gentry did what they wanted, did not obey any royal decrees. The royal treasury was empty, he had nothing to support the army. Vladislav generally became a toy of magnates. The Sejm did not give money.

    The king is good. Boyars are bad.
  9. 0
    24 February 2023 11: 09
    I read the opus of this Samson snake and the first thing that came to mind .. more to your stubby little mind, Carthage should be destroyed .. Ukraine has no right to exist
  10. 0
    18 March 2023 14: 51
    The story is like a drawbar where it turned There and it came out. Who wrote chronicles? Winners, everything else was burned. Therefore, it is impossible to unequivocally say what really happened there, as Ivan the Terrible drove, gave modern Khodarkovsky, bulk and other riffraff. One thing is seen in the absolute, whoever contacts Gulyaipole, despite the momentary benefit, then falls apart, that in this article Poland, then Austria-Hungary with Germany and the Russian Empire, then the USSR. For some time, with a significant reduction in this kizyachny ethnic group, order was put in place for the reducer, both under the Mongols and under the Poles. But as soon as this ethnic group multiplies, it immediately destroys, and it doesn’t matter the enslavers in the form of Mongols, Poles or liberators who give blessings (Russian empire, USSR). Unfortunately, like any dung that poisons neighboring territories, the outskirts will not give us peace, but in any case, it’s not worth freeing it further, it’s better for the European Union to ruin it, like a mastevka at school, the West slips us the outskirts and we throw them into them.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"