Upgraded Murena landing craft ready for production

58
Upgraded Murena landing craft ready for production
Boat "Murena" comes ashore. Photo "Rosoboronexport"


Since the beginning of the XNUMXs, the possibility of launching mass production of modernized Murena-M hovercraft landing craft has been discussed. Also, enterprises from the United Shipbuilding Corporation were developing the project and preparing production. As reported, the construction of the first boats of a new type can start this year at the Khabarovsk shipyard.



Year plans


On January 9, Vesti.Khabarovsk TV broadcast an interview with Sergey Korolev, Chief Engineer of Khabarovsk Shipbuilding Plant JSC (KhSZ). The main topic of the conversation was the company's plans for the new year 2023 and the specifics of their implementation. Thus, much attention was paid to the issues of working with personnel, attracting young people, etc. In addition, S. Korolev spoke about the ongoing and planned construction of ships and vessels.

The chief engineer of the enterprise recalled that at the moment the cooperation of KhSZ with the naval fleet limited to the repair of equipment. Nevertheless, the construction of new combat units for the Navy may begin in the near future. According to S. Korolev, this will be an important milestone in stories factory.

The chief engineer told what exactly KhSZ would build. So, the plant, together with the design organization, recently defended an initiative project for the modernization of a landing hovercraft (DKVP) under the code "Murena". This year, the plant expects to receive an order from the Ministry of Defense for the construction of such equipment. S. Korolev hopes that the first boats of the new series will also be laid down before the end of the year.

The Ministry of Defense has not yet commented on the plans of the KhSZ leadership. If it intends to place an order for new boats, the details of such plans are still unknown. It is not clear how soon the contract will appear, what will be the size and cost of the series, etc. However, if KhSZ management correctly assesses the situation, all these details may become known in the coming months.


The boat is ready for landing. Photo "OSK"

According to the basic project


The basic version of the DKVP pr. 12061 Murena was developed back in the early eighties by the Leningrad Central Design Bureau Almaz. By the middle of the decade, the bureau had prepared technical documentation and handed it over to the Khabarovsk shipbuilding plant for mastering serial construction. Soon the laying of the first boats took place.

The lead Murena with tail number D-453 was handed over to the customer in 1985. From 1987 to 1992. KhSZ built and commissioned seven more boats. All these pennants were intended for the landing forces of the Pacific Fleet. They were assigned to one unit based in the port of Khabarovsk. New DKVP were involved several times in various maneuvers and exercises.

In November 1994, in connection with the general problems of the Russian Navy, it was decided to transfer all Muren from the landing forces to the coast guard of the Federal Security Service. As part of this structure, the boats served until the middle of the 143s, when they decided to write them off due to the development of the resource. The first seven boats were subsequently disposed of as unnecessary. The last representative of the series, D-XNUMX, ended up in the KhSZ workshop, where it was mothballed.

In the first half of the 2004s, KhSZ received the only export order for Murena. Three Russian DKVPs have been acquired by the South Korean Navy. These boats were laid down in 2005 and 2006, and by the end of XNUMX they were handed over to the customer and began service. In the future, the emergence of new South Korean orders was not ruled out.

Resumption of construction


The construction of DKVP pr. 12061 for the Russian fleet stopped in the early nineties. The only export contract was completed in the middle of the XNUMXs. Nevertheless, proposals were regularly made to resume the construction of boats in the interests of the Russian Navy.


Landing at sea. Graphics "Rosoboronexport"

Such ideas were developed in the early 2014s in connection with the construction of the Mistral universal landing ships. For use on such UDC, a modernized Murena-M DKVP was developed. In 2014, it was reported about the possibility of building five such pennants to equip two landing ships. However, in 15-XNUMX France refused to transfer ready-made UDCs to Russia, and the further fate of the upgraded Muren was in question.

In 2018, it became known that this project was not abandoned. Similar boats can be built for domestic UDC of a new project. The possibility of building a series of eight units before 2027 was mentioned. The first Murena-M could be laid before the end of the decade.

However, such plans were also not implemented for one reason or another. As it is now reported, only by now KhSZ and the design organization have completed the development of a modernized version of the boat and have prepared production. Now they are counting on receiving a contract from the Ministry of Defense, after which they will begin construction.

Technical features


The old pr. 12061 "Murena" provided for the construction of a hovercraft of a traditional design. Such a DKVP was intended for the transportation and landing of troops on an unequipped coast, and could also provide fire support. The possibility of working as a minelayer was envisaged.

The Murena boat received a box-shaped hull with an inner deck to accommodate the landing force. On the sides of it were the units of the power plant and the injection units of the air cushion. The length of the boat reached 31,3 m with a width of 14,6 m. The total displacement was 150 tons, incl. almost 50 tons of payload.


Moray model. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

The power plant of the boat consisted of two gas turbine engines with a capacity of 10 thousand hp each. Through gearboxes, power was distributed to two air cushion blowers inside the hull and two propellers for movement. The air cushion provided movement at a low altitude above the surface and made it possible to overcome some obstacles. The boat developed speeds up to 55 knots and had a cruising range of up to 200 nautical miles.

Inside the hull was tank deck, which occupied almost the entire length of the boat. For loading and disembarking there was a folding bow ramp. Murena could take on board one main tank, two armored personnel carriers or infantry fighting vehicles, two guns with tractors, or up to 140 paratroopers.

For self-defense and fire support of the landing force, the boat carried two AK-306 artillery mounts and two BP-30 mounts with AGS-17 automatic grenade launchers. The crew also had several MANPADS. After opening the ramp, the landing force could fire from a personal weapons or use the weapons of their combat vehicles.

According to known data, the current Murena-M project provides for the preservation of the main design features, layout solutions, etc. At the same time, the updated DKVP should be equipped with modern engines, electronic systems and weapons. Due to this, a significant increase in tactical, technical and operational characteristics will be obtained. In addition, it will be possible to ensure compatibility with modern Navy control loops.

Awaiting construction


The Russian Navy needs various landing craft, incl. boats with a displacement of up to 150 tons and a carrying capacity of up to 50 tons. In the past, this niche was occupied by DKVP pr. 12061 Murena, but they were decommissioned and disposed of long ago. Over the past few years, the possibility of building similar boats made using modern materials and technologies has been considered.

For various reasons, the development of the Murena-M project and the preparation for production were significantly delayed. However, to date, the design organization and the manufacturer have completed the required preparations and are ready to start construction. Now everything depends on the Ministry of Defense, which will have to determine whether such boats are needed, in what quantity and in what timeframe - and then issue the appropriate order.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    13 January 2023 05: 32
    The air view radar is not visible, which means the air defense is purely formal. With such a range, either jump around the islands (such as the Kuril Islands), or work from dock ships (which we don’t have). Well, the Baltic still.
    1. +7
      13 January 2023 08: 42
      It belongs to the MDKVP class - a small landing hovercraft, it has an autonomy of 200 miles, they usually go in a landing order, and are intended for the first or second wave of landings over the horizon. In theory, they are generally disposable, like product No. 2. The troops were landed, but going back is hardly possible.
      1. +3
        13 January 2023 10: 21
        It is unlikely that it will be used in the warrant! For such operations, the DKVP Zubr is used; two ships have been retained in the Baltic.
        And, Murena will be inside the UDC and BDK (11711).
        1. AAK
          +5
          13 January 2023 15: 25
          To place at least 2 such DKVPs on the UDC, they need to be completely converted into something close to Amer's LTsAK, since the height of the dock chamber will turn out to be too high, for use with the UDC, only a high-speed and lifting landing craft is needed, and not a DKVP as such, and 50 tons of load capacity - not enough, you need at least 60-65 tons
          1. 0
            15 January 2023 21: 44
            According to the project UDC 29300, it can contain 4 moray eels! What, to redo, if the dimensions of Moray are included in the project?
            Why would they want 60-65? Moray eels with a carrying capacity of 50 tons, designed based on 1 tank or 2 armored personnel carriers, you probably do not know that our equipment is lighter than Western counterparts! Since you are writing about 60-65t.?
            Or are you a fan of NATO technology?
        2. +5
          13 January 2023 23: 13
          Dear, I'm sorry, but I don't know what you graduated from, where you served, what you went to. "Moray eels" were at the Pacific Fleet, the shoulder was suitable, "Bison" at the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet, they have an autonomy of 100 miles more. We don’t have UDC now, before, in my time, there was 1174 Rhino, with an aft dock chamber, for Kalmar. So they were all written off and cut into needles.
      2. +3
        13 January 2023 15: 33
        Quote: tatarin1972
        It belongs to the MDKVP class - a small landing hovercraft, it has an autonomy of 200 miles, they usually go in a landing order, and are intended for the first or second wave of landings over the horizon.

        We DO NOT have dock ships, which means that 370 km is the maximum range from the base, this ship CANNOT go without a pressurized airbag, which means that it will not be able to go in the order of surface ships either.
        1. +1
          14 January 2023 08: 10
          Any ship on the VP cannot go without pressurization, in general.
          To drive the air cushion blowers and propellers, the boat is equipped with two high-temperature gas turbine engines with a capacity of 10 hp each. With. For the formation of an air cushion, 000 injection units with an axial impeller with a diameter of 2 m are used.
          1. 0
            14 January 2023 09: 44
            Quote: tatarin1972
            Any ship on the VP cannot go without pressurization, in general.

            Amphibious no hi, but the skeg type "Bora", or the type "Smyuge" is completely.
        2. 0
          April 7 2023 05: 12
          Well, he will be able to force the Dnieper and large reservoirs. And he does not care about minefields.
  2. +1
    13 January 2023 05: 37
    How secure is the boat itself?
    Vital components and assemblies, for example, from a heavy machine gun?
    After all, the landing sometimes needs to be evacuated, under enemy fire.

    Ags17 is somehow not enough at the present time ... An automatic (fully automated) 82 mm mortar, which is not there, unified with a land self-propelled one, would be useful here.
    1. +4
      13 January 2023 10: 14
      What are you talking about? Can you imagine the application of this DKVP?
      He has two AK 306s - the main armament.
    2. +2
      13 January 2023 12: 28
      I wonder why, with such thoughts, you still have not had similar questions to our BDK? lol laughing
  3. +8
    13 January 2023 05: 39
    The project is ready, but apparently the Ministry of Defense and specifically the Navy do not show much, but generally no interest. Hope for the plant only for export. Again, to whom? China, based on our experience, has mastered the construction itself, they do not need it. It is a pity the work of the plant.
    1. +1
      13 January 2023 21: 36
      Apparently, our Navy refused to conduct landing operations at all levels due to the inability to conduct them and the potential high losses in their implementation. So I doubt that in the future we will generally pay attention to such types of weapons.
      1. +1
        15 January 2023 07: 28
        Quote: Evgeny Ivanov_5
        Apparently, our Navy refused to conduct landing operations at all levels due to the inability to conduct them and the potential high losses in their implementation.

        Odessa, remaining under Bandera, is the most confident confirmation of this
  4. +8
    13 January 2023 05: 40
    Why is he needed? Walk from Vladivostok to Nakhodka?
    1. +5
      13 January 2023 06: 06
      From Vladivostok to Nakhodka, the new highway will be there in an hour by car
    2. 0
      13 January 2023 13: 48
      rather for marines in the Kuriles - to walk between the islands
      2 AK-306 ideally change for 1 ZRPK Pantsir-M
      1. 0
        15 January 2023 21: 49
        What for? This is a landing ship, for the rapid delivery of troops, not an air defense ship!
  5. +1
    13 January 2023 06: 12
    But what about the Husky project? Something about him is not heard at all.
    1. +4
      13 January 2023 08: 46
      Husky, more suitable for civilian use!
      Its planned load capacity is 10t.
      The question arises, how will we carry out over-the-horizon landing of military equipment when the armored personnel carrier 82 weighs 15 tons?
    2. -1
      13 January 2023 13: 50
      SVP Husky swing up to a carrying capacity of 90 tons
  6. +6
    13 January 2023 08: 39
    So far, apart from forcing the Dnieper, there is no scope for these boats.
    1. 0
      13 January 2023 14: 39
      From the spit to Ochakovo, 5 km in a straight line, 3 trips per hour for 1 boat, for 3 trips you can deliver either 3 tanks or 6 armored personnel carriers / infantry fighting vehicles / cargo. car or 390 people l / s. 10 boats and for an hour on the other side roughly 15 tanks 10 different armored personnel carriers / infantry fighting vehicles to choose from 10 / air defense / cargo / guns and 650 people l / s. In a day it would be possible to catch up with a lot of people, and this is even without the use of conventional landing craft and helicopters. I understand that in theory everything is very good, but in my opinion these boats would be of great help to us now in the same Kherson, stupidly even to provide everything we need. Yes, maybe they have a narrow application, but in the realities of the NWO, they would have found it. We needed everything as always before. It's sad how it gets.
  7. +3
    13 January 2023 08: 53
    In 2009, a contract was signed with Kuwait. But not implemented...
  8. +1
    13 January 2023 09: 00
    With the advent of information about Murena, a logical chain is being built!
    For the production of DKVP, gas turbine engines are needed!
    Rybinsk has already mastered the production of gas turbine engines of wide application.
    On the stocks in Kerch, two UDC 29300 are being built, in Kaliningrad two BDK 11711.
    For over-the-horizon landing on the UDC according to the 4 DKVP project, on the BDK is it unclear? We planned 6 recreation centers of Serna, but there are no dock cameras. And it begs to place DKVP Muren there.
    Murena has a carrying capacity of 50 tons - this is 1 tank or 2 armored personnel carriers or other military equipment weighing up to 50 tons.
    1. +1
      13 January 2023 11: 29
      Quote: Sergey39
      With the advent of information about Murena, a logical chain is being built!

      And how did you intend to transfer Moray eels from Khabarovsk to the West?
  9. -1
    13 January 2023 09: 35
    Just on the Dnieper and the Black Sea, I would practice with this model. work out tactics.
  10. +2
    13 January 2023 10: 08
    There have already been articles.
    When compared with American landing craft on a pillow, then moray eels:
    Big
    Expensive,
    Complex
    Noisy and greedy

    the Americans relied on small practical boats, and they seem to be still working with them.
    And here the complexity and high cost can be seen scaring off the military
    1. +5
      13 January 2023 12: 48
      Comparative characteristics of DKVP
      American LCAC. - Russian moray eel
      Displacement 173-185t. - 150t.
      Length. 26,4m. - 31,3 m
      Width 14,3m. - 14,6 m
      Speed. 40 knots. - 55 knots
      The payload is almost the same.
      As for the voracity of Our engines - Yes! Western engines always eat less fuel!
      Noise! Immediately the question is, did DKVP pass by you at least once?
      The armament of the American 2 machine guns, we have 2 AK 306 and AGS
      American, more like a platform, and Our Moray is like a ship.
      So draw your own conclusions!
      1. +2
        13 January 2023 15: 36
        Quote: Sergey39
        American LCAC. - Russian moray eel

        Moray eel is better, but we do NOT have dock ships, and all its steepness works 370 km from its coast in one direction.
        1. 0
          15 January 2023 21: 53
          Yes! Of course, there are no UDCs that are being built yet!
          But, We do not have Moray eels, which are going to build!
      2. +1
        14 January 2023 13: 12
        Exactly.
        our miniship. Therefore, it was expensive and little built, and it is apparently difficult to maintain.
        they have a universal vehicle. Therefore, relatively cheap and relatively massive.

        Better? According to the fighting qualities of Murena, IMHO. For transport and service - rather LCAC
    2. 0
      16 January 2023 12: 17
      Quote: Max1995
      the Americans relied on small practical boats, and they seem to be still working with them.


      So what? You never know what the shtatovsky military industry has done in the last 30 years. They declared tanks unnecessary and produced "stealth irons", and planned laser boings and rail guns. They have new destroyers and those keel up :) :) :)

      The shtatovtsy have their own concept of the fleet. It is based on the massive use of carrier-based aircraft in local "monkey wars". I am generally perplexed by the very idea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbUDC. What will force the enemy, if he is armed with submarines with anti-ship missiles on board, to humbly observe the deployment of this miracle-yuda in the immediate vicinity of their shores? And what will make him watch how he is landing in an amphibious direction from unarmed boats to the VP?

      And by the way, can you tell me where exactly "they seem to be still working for them"? In promotional films and maneuvers? None of the modern US wars has been marked by amphibious landings. As a rule, their fleet prefers to participate as a mobile battery of the Tomahawk CR. And if infantry is transported by sea, then it lands in ports.
  11. +3
    13 January 2023 10: 22
    Even if there is an order, then only for a few pieces (probably 4 pieces) for new UDCs and that's it. This will not save the plant, you need to load capacity with something more substantial - for example, the construction of minesweepers and MPKs! And then new minesweepers have to be dragged from St. Petersburg to Kamchatka and Vladik!
    1. 0
      13 January 2023 11: 28
      New minesweepers Alexandrite! All-plastic - this is a unique production!
      And, there at the shipyard, they work with metal !!!
    2. +3
      13 January 2023 11: 36
      Quote: moreman78
      And then new minesweepers have to be dragged from St. Petersburg to Kamchatka and Vladik!

      what Do you consider the problem with mastering the production of a fiberglass hull? He set up the KhSZ construction of Alexandrites, built 30 pieces .... and then? What to do with the equipment? Wouldn't it be easier to increase production at Pella?
      1. 0
        13 January 2023 12: 33
        Pella will have enough work if they finish the series of Alexandrite Minesweepers!
        Today, superstructures for ships are made of fiberglass.
        1. +1
          13 January 2023 12: 57
          Quote: Sergey39
          Pella will have enough work if they finish the series of Alexandrite Minesweepers!

          So I’m saying, isn’t it easier to organize state support for Pelle than to spend money on the insignificant production of the same Alexandrites in Khabarovsk ?!
          Quote: Sergey39
          superstructures for ships are made of fiberglass.

          For example?
          1. +2
            14 January 2023 11: 02
            Do you know how many real (and not according to the plans of our admirals) minesweepers are required for the Pacific Fleet? Minimum 12 pieces. Pella's plans - 30 pieces for 4 fleets and 1 flotilla! It's a drop in the ocean...
            Further, the fleet needs MPCs like air, which there is not even a project ... So everything is very sad.
          2. 0
            15 January 2023 21: 55
            Example: Corvettes 20380-20385, Frigates 22350.
      2. 0
        14 January 2023 09: 02
        The bottom line is that the Alexandrite case is really unique technology. And their use will only increase. 30 Alexandrites will finish and can be re-profiled. Such buildings are the future.
  12. +2
    13 January 2023 17: 11
    why does THIS "work" that does not carry a semantic load hang in the weapons section? this place is high on the news. ahh. ryabov. the question is closed.
  13. +1
    13 January 2023 21: 08
    The port of Khabarovsk is located on the Amur River. Does this also apply to TOF?
    1. 0
      15 January 2023 22: 00
      The shipyard JSC "Amur Shipbuilding Plant", the same is located on the Amur, but it builds warships and ships for the Pacific Fleet, and They have an outfitting base in Vladivostok! All corvettes 20380 at the Pacific Fleet were built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
  14. +2
    13 January 2023 21: 28
    And why is it needed? I remember at VO experts screaming hoarsely about the moral death of mobile landing operations. They demanded the disbandment of the Marine Corps and the Airborne Forces with the creation of light divisions on their basis, since any landings other than tactical helicopters are doomed to failure.
    1. +3
      14 January 2023 08: 22
      There were already such "figures" in the fifties of the last century. Thanks to them, the units of the Marine Corps were disbanded and the Vyborg Military School of the Marine Corps was disbanded. Then, they really changed their minds, after the combined arms regiment swayed during the exercises and could not complete the task.
      The MP and Airborne Forces units are highly mobile, they will not be disbanded, the time of the "Taburetkin" is over, now, it seems, the MP brigades will again be equipped with a third battalion, new airborne divisions are being formed.
  15. +1
    14 January 2023 22: 38
    Perhaps they would be useful, but I have little idea how Saturn will produce the required number of turbines. There is often a deficit for other ships.
    1. 0
      15 January 2023 22: 28
      You write but do not know the topic!
      Saturn is building gas turbines for specific orders! Especially related to the construction of 22350 frigates, and other ships use only diesels.
  16. +1
    16 January 2023 12: 38
    And that's what never ceases to amaze me. Why is there no unification of combat modules in our army and navy? Probably AK-306 is a good module. And it has undeniable advantages. But why is it better than Bakhchi-U? A pair of such modules with 100-mm cannons would give this vehicle a combat potential as a means of fire support for the assault.
    There is also a short-range air defense complex "Gibka-S" in the troops. From the fleet, by the way, who came. Its new version is supplemented by the 1L122 "Garmon" radar. Three jeeps are carrying two launchers and a reconnaissance-target designation vehicle.
    Why is this technique not used where it makes sense?

    A pair of BM Bakhcha-U and one Shibka-S complex, and now we will get anti-aircraft and anti-aircraft defense systems. Yes, short range air defense. But much better than a few soldiers in MANPADS on their shoulders.
    1. 0
      19 January 2023 02: 31
      Well, because the ak-603 is an air defense system, but there is no melon ... Another thing is that the ak-603 is also outdated. It would be logical to put either a duet or a broadsword.
      1. 0
        23 January 2023 10: 54
        Complex? Without radar and OLS? Are you seriously? On the ships can manage the Bagheera. But this boat has none of that. And without radar and OLS, the AK-603 air defense system does not make sense.
        In addition, I remind you: the Mi-28N helicopter is capable of hitting this boat from a distance of more than 5 km with the Ataka missile of the Shturm complex. This is outside the passport range of the AK-603 for air targets.
        I do not just focus on Gibka-S. And her radar.

        Broadsword and Duet, EMNIP require ornate support. Up to the high pressure air line. Bending is much easier in requirements.
  17. 0
    18 January 2023 12: 59
    The middle of the 2500s, is it XNUMX years, approximately?
  18. Eug
    0
    18 January 2023 18: 32
    And who makes the gas turbine power plant? Rybinsk? So there is a queue for its engines .... wangyu - there will be no Muren, primarily due to the lack of a propulsion system ... or while the hulls are being built, will the engines be ready? There is another option - if Muren was prepared for the "French", perhaps the engines have been in Russia for a long time?
  19. 0
    19 January 2023 02: 27
    The boat is normal, but more for small special forces operations. For large landing operations, you need to update and build Bison.
  20. 0
    20 January 2023 18: 57
    Who is this thing to use against? Carries 1 tank ... Only against Somali pirates armed with Akm. Today's course has clearly shown what needs to be developed and where.
  21. 0
    22 January 2023 11: 50
    They were assigned to one unit based in the port of Khabarovsk.

    Not in the port, but at the KAF Base, in the Kirov backwater.
    And they were the Division of landing assault ships, as part of the 23rd ObrPSKR.

    a decision was made to transfer all Muren from the landing forces to the coast guard of the Federal Security Service.

    There were no FSB coastal forces then, but there was the FPS - the Federal Border Service.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"