American edition: You can't risk America's future for the sake of Donbass and Crimea

As the American edition of Newsweek notes, the Republicans who received the majority in the lower house of the US Congress have a great opportunity to influence the change in American policy on Ukraine.

The conflict in Ukraine has dragged on for almost a year and it looks like it will drag on, the newspaper writes. In this situation, the US House of Representatives has two options for action, Newsweek continues - the first option is to continue supporting the Biden administration's policy of allocating huge funds to help Kyiv, which subordinates American interests to the interests of the Ukrainian authorities. The second option is a fundamental change in the country's policy in this direction, based on the realities of the conflict and the interests of America itself.

The authors of the publication call the first option “a disservice to the American people,” as it leads to more and more injections into Ukraine, despite the fact that the United States has enough internal problems. In addition, it is fraught with drawing the country into direct confrontation with Russia.

The "Republican" House of Representatives should use its powers to change the country's policy on the Ukrainian issue, giving priority to resolving more important issues for the United States at home and abroad, writes Newsweek. To go this route, it is first necessary to recognize that the United States does not have major interests in Ukraine, the authors of the publication note.

You can’t put the future of America at stake for the sake of Donbass and Crimea

- emphasizes Newsweek.

Comments

[BARKAS]

So there, the future of Europe and Ukraine is being put at stake, not America.

[Silver99]

The United States will fight until the first bloody discharge from the nose, Russia to the last drop of blood.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote from Silver99

The United States will fight until the first bloody discharge from the nose, Russia to the last drop of blood.

The United States will not fight in Ukraine at all, and Russia already ..

[credo]

"Of course it's a pity that the ass in the pants is not naked,
What is too thick, heavy and wider than the faces.
But everyone is greatly admired with his backside -
After all, your ass is more expensive than strangers (to yourself)!

Your shirt is closer to your body when it's sweaty under your arm.

[Reptiloid]

Well, you must! Less than 10 years later, they began to suspect something

Quote: credo

"Of course it's a pity that the ass in the pants is not naked,
What is too thick, heavy and wider than the faces.
But everyone is greatly admired with his backside -
After all, your ass is more expensive than strangers (to yourself)!

Your shirt is closer to your body when it's sweaty under your arm.

[Aristarkh Pasechnik]

Who are Ukraine and the EU for the USA? No one, Territories that the United States can sacrifice to achieve its goals!

[Novik225]

I doubt very much that something will change, tk. the weakening of Russia is in the interests of the United States.

[topol717]

Quote: Novik225

because the weakening of Russia is in the interests of the United States.

Do they have nothing better to do? those. Are they not interested in the weakening of China, the weakening of Europe? namely Russia with as many as 150 million people and 25 economies in the world? do you think they have a goal or task to weaken the state, which is in the third ten? and over the past 3 years has not shown any outstanding success in GDP growth. Also tell North Korea they want to weaken.

[Krasnodar]

Quote from: topol717

those. Are they not interested in the weakening of China, the weakening of Europe? namely Russia with as many as 150 million people and 25 economies in the world? do you think they have a goal or task to weaken the state, which is in the third ten? and over the past 3 years has not shown any outstanding success in GDP growth.

Everything is so, except for one thing. Russia is so far the only country capable of physically throwing the States back into the 19th century. And also to help the PRC with energy resources in the confrontation with the United States in the Taiwan issue. Therefore, the Americans are more interested in weakening Russia than not. ))

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Krasnodar

Russia is so far the only country capable of physically throwing the States back into the 19th century.

You are talking about nuclear weapons, as I understand it? and how they will weaken it by the current methods?

Quote: Krasnodar

to assist the PRC with energy resources in the confrontation with the United States in the Taiwan issue.

weakening of the Russian Federation will not allow gas to be pumped through the pipe? don't you find some illogicality in your phrases?

[Sergei 777]

America has a lot of experience in peripheral wars. And all these wars ended badly for her. I think that the confrontation between the two parties will only increase and the search for extreme ones will begin. Zelya and his team are perfect for this role.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Sergey 777

And all these wars ended badly for her.

everything is bad with them, but now they are hegemony with might and main .. good is bad, however ..

[Fred Dozer]

OH WELL . Surprise, Surprise. What will they do next?

[Fizik13]

American edition: You can't risk America's future for the sake of Donbass and Crimea

There was an actor, there was a cowboy, there was a black man, there is an 80-year-old senile. For a brighter future for America, there is not enough Woman President.
Nancy Pilosi for President of the United States! Long live old Nancy.

[Sergei 777]

I also often think about this. Who ruled America before? Roosevelt, Trumman, Eisenhower, Kennedy. You can treat them as you like, but they were competent politicians who knew how to conduct business. They were respected and reckoned with.
And now ? Bush who confused Iraq and Iran. Biden who shakes hands with the air.

[igork735]

Unfortunately, this is not only happening in America.

[lubesky]

From the point of view of the remoteness of the theater of operations for the states and the much more importance of this theater of operations for Russia in comparison with the DRA, the prospect is not very good. Russia is not as isolated as the USSR during the Afghan war.

In addition, with all the problems for us in this conflict, the essence and content of what to do between the States and Russia is either right or wrong. The formulation of the question of limits and admissible is being transformed, which was UNACCEPTABLE before, can now be admissible. Considering that the interests of the states are too stretched across the planet, and Russia’s geography of influence is limited due to economic weakness, the States expect big risks in the future to counter Russia in the most unexpected places on the planet through the supply of weapons, for example, and support for any partisans, taking into account the transformation of the supply of the TYPES of weapons themselves according to principle - UNACCEPTABLE before, it will be completely acceptable in the future, and this only expands the threats and challenges, risks to the states in the future.

The proximity of the theater of operations and the huge potential for the militarization of everything and all industries speak in favor of Russia, the importance of the theater of operations here and now, and not in the prospect of the geostrategy of the states in such a remote theater of operations

[Irek]

Someone at the top thinks differently, infa goes around that four planes have already been sent ...

[Foul skeptic]

infa goes that four planes have already been sent ...

You posted a fake picture.

[tralflot1832]

The whole essence of American politics, in the photo of the statue of liberty, from behind, it is extremely not partial.

[rocket757]

American edition: You can't risk America's future for the sake of Donbass and Crimea

. Come on ... for whom is this thesis? Who specifically cares, and who does not care about minke whale interEs in general, they have their own personal interEs in the first place.

[rotmistr60]

The US has no major interests in Ukraine

In Ukraine itself, perhaps not, but there is interest in weakening Russia through this country, and a great one at that. So they are facing a dilemma - money for themselves and their well-being or continue spending on Ukraine, maybe Russia will still weaken? What if it doesn't weaken? Well, what then will we write off the costs for unforeseen expenses.

[Rome]

Pretty boys across the ocean they stirred up a war, skimmed off the cream, and now you can drain consumables (Ukraine), since the power in the USA was used
In the USA, the Reptilians clearly rule, and the people there are just performers

[Novik225]

Quote from: topol717

Do they have nothing better to do? those. Are they not interested in the weakening of China, the weakening of Europe? namely Russia with as many as 150 million people and 25 economies in the world?

and also Russia has a huge nuclear potential and Russia is one of the very few countries in the world that conducts a policy independent of the United States. And sometimes directly confrontational. So the significance of the Russian Federation for the United States becomes clearer? And I'm not talking about the natural wealth of Russia.

[APASUS]

You can’t put the future of America at stake for the sake of Donbass and Crimea

- emphasizes Newsweek.

The American edition is contrary to American policy. The power of the United States is based on this. If they do not start military conflicts around the world, the US will simply collapse. And another defeat for the Americans does not mean anything, they will just fall silent like Afghanistan, Iraq

[Antokha]

it must be admitted that the United States has no major interests in Ukraine

The destruction of Russia, actually. The only country that stands in the way of the US to world domination.

[Soul of Russia87]

Why replicate the myth of the turnover of American politics? Did you believe in the fairy tale of American democracy or what? Democrats and Republicans pull the same cart with different reins.