Advisor to the head of Zelensky's office Podolyak: Negotiations on the receipt of ATACMS operational-tactical missiles by Ukraine are underway

42
Advisor to the head of Zelensky's office Podolyak: Negotiations on the receipt of ATACMS operational-tactical missiles by Ukraine are underway

Ukraine does not intend to give up plans to adopt long-range ATACMS missiles for existing HIMARS MLRS, representatives of Kyiv continue negotiations with Washington. This was stated by adviser to the head of Zelensky's office Mikhail Podolyak.

According to the representative of the Kyiv regime, despite the refusal of the Americans to supply long-range missiles to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, negotiations on this topic have not stopped and are being conducted very actively. In Kyiv, they do not exclude that in the near future the United States will meet Zelensky halfway and still provide the requested weapons. In support of this, the fact of the transfer to Kyiv of two batteries of Patriot anti-aircraft systems, the supply of which was previously prohibited, is given.



Confirms the negotiations on the supply of missiles and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba. According to him, Kyiv hopes that this year the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be put into service. Tanks western style drums Drones and ATACMS missiles with a range of 300 km. At the same time, the Ukrainian minister does not make any forecasts, arguing that the Americans will hand over everything requested by Kiev.

Ukraine's latest attempt to obtain long-range missiles from the United States was Zelensky's visit to Washington, who planned to personally persuade Biden to supply Kyiv with the necessary weapon, but received a categorical refusal. According to the source, Washington negatively assesses the potential consequences of transferring such missiles to Kyiv, fearing that Zelensky will order strikes deep into Russian territory. No one trusts his word anymore.

Earlier, Kyiv stated that for the Armed Forces to go on the offensive, at least 300 Western-made tanks, ATACMS missile systems and at least 10 Patriot air defense batteries are needed.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    42 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      11 January 2023 06: 50
      And all why? But because so far there have been no preventive strikes on the territory of Poland and Romania, otherwise they would have banged another one and warned that next time operational-tactical missiles would be with special ammunition. Let's wait for the Yankees to hand over to the Ukrainian Nazi Yao
      1. -2
        11 January 2023 06: 54
        But because so far there have been no preventive strikes on the territory of Poland and Romania


        And it won't. Because then it will definitely fly back.
        1. +5
          11 January 2023 06: 56
          and for us, what difference does it make if these missiles fly from Ukraine to our cities or from Poland and Romania?
          1. +8
            11 January 2023 07: 00
            Graz hi, big, the war with Ukraine leaves the Kremlin room for maneuver, the war with Poland and Romania is only a one-way path, that is, to World War 3 with all its consequences and victims.
            1. +1
              11 January 2023 09: 42
              On the contrary, the Kremlin has no room for maneuver, if the enemy has no fear of us, he can raise the stakes endlessly, pressing us against the wall. It turns out that we, under fear of a "response", cannot embed, and the enemy of our "response" is not afraid. There is an alternative way - large-scale assistance to the PRC with people and equipment. But Mr. Xi does not seem to be eager, and we do not insist too convincingly.
        2. +2
          11 January 2023 06: 57
          Or it won't fly. If you drive under the bench.
          1. 0
            11 January 2023 07: 01
            Who will drive? And why haven't they been driven yet?
            1. +1
              11 January 2023 07: 11
              The Russian Federation should drive. Destroyed transit points.
              Why didn't they put the question, not to me.
          2. +2
            11 January 2023 07: 08
            Maxim G hi, no longer driven, the West shows with every step that it is not afraid of aggravation with Russia, the freezing of assets due to theft, the supply of more and more new types of weapons, the departure of their company even to the detriment of their economies, all these are links in one chain.
            1. +1
              11 January 2023 07: 13
              Quote: Murmur 55
              Maxim G, you can’t drive it anymore, the West shows with every step that it is not afraid of an aggravation with Russia, an asset freeze due to theft, the supply of more and more new types of weapons, their company leaving even to the detriment of their economies, all these are links in one chain.

              And the West does not suffer at all.
              Except economically. And we haven't seen a serious analysis, apparently serious dividends await.

              There is another softer option, of course.
              1. 0
                11 January 2023 07: 26
                Maxim G, of course, suffers, BUT not as we wanted, they are a team, and we have no allies, no friends, only muddy fellow travelers and then, well, very muddy ones. At one time, we believed the West too much and destroyed our OWN that cannot be destroyed, I'm talking about the economy and technology, now it all needs to be restored, and this is time and MONEY.
                1. 0
                  11 January 2023 07: 34
                  There are Cuba, China, North Korea, India, Belarus.

                  I think you can definitely rely on the DPRK.
                  Having put them on a turnkey basis, aircraft with anti-ship missiles, air defense, helicopters with anti-tank systems and Vitebsk.

                  We can and do all this.
        3. +1
          11 January 2023 09: 36
          And it won't. Because then it will definitely fly back.

          With such reasoning, we cannot win and it was worth starting - the enemy is not afraid of our nuclear weapons. we tied our own hands, they have superiority in conventional weapons and human resources, that is, again there is no fear
    2. -1
      11 January 2023 06: 53
      They will get it, they will definitely get it, but what will Washington do for the supply of such missiles? tanks? Combat aviation? Patriot systems in the Armed Forces are already being prepared and what are the CONSEQUENCES for the US?
    3. +1
      11 January 2023 06: 54
      Advisor to Zelensky's office Podolyak: Negotiations on Ukraine's receipt of ATACMS operational-tactical missiles are underway
      And by the spring they will receive them ... this is already clear, and if not directly from the United States, then from the small British or the Baltics
    4. Two
      +2
      11 January 2023 06: 59
      hi It is high time to burn out the western border area of ​​the Svidomites! Until complete desertification! So that not only there were no railways and highways, but also roadside bushes, so that there was nowhere to sit.
    5. -2
      11 January 2023 07: 00
      Quote: Graz
      and for us, what difference does it make if these missiles fly from Ukraine to our cities or from Poland and Romania?


      And what do you suggest?
      It will fly anyway, so what.
      1. +1
        11 January 2023 07: 03
        I propose a preventive strike by tiao, demolish a couple of cities in Poland and Romania, and then we'll see. will the nuclear countries risk blathering something in our direction
        1. 0
          11 January 2023 07: 08
          And finally turn Russia into a pariah country?
          Or do you really believe that the one-time destruction of tens of thousands of civilians in our country will be put on the brakes?
          1. +1
            11 January 2023 07: 12
            Well, they let the American down. And what do you propose to wipe yourself all the time? We have not even helped insurgent movements in other countries to destroy even one American base. although we have everything for this to transfer weapons for this
            1. -2
              11 January 2023 07: 19
              well, they let the American down

              Stop stop stop. We, on the other hand, advertise at every step that we are not like the Americans. This time.
              And two, this is that the US used nuclear weapons against the aggressor.
        2. 0
          11 January 2023 07: 10
          Graz, there’s nothing to see here, they’ll blather, and not weakly and from all sides, don’t think that cowardly suckers are sitting on the other side, who won’t fight without Coca-Cola.
          1. +1
            11 January 2023 07: 15
            they will not blather, they are afraid, their ops are much closer to them and the Romanians and the Balts and the Poles
            1. 0
              11 January 2023 07: 38
              Graz, they won’t be afraid, I assure you, at the beginning of the NWO, ours warned third parties from participating in the conflict and their consequences, and what were they afraid of? They stole 300 lard in the form of assets from a nuclear power with the second army of the world, one of the leading suppliers of hydrocarbons, they impudently supply weapons that kill our soldiers and civilians, and what do you think they are afraid of? They would be afraid not to climb. And they do not worry about themselves because they know that they will survive.
              1. +1
                11 January 2023 08: 56
                Ours, too, will not be afraid to bang in Poland or Romania.
                An act of aggression on the part of these countries is enough to recognize them as aggressors and declare war.

                Article 5 of NATO applies in the event of an "attack on one of the members of NATO"
                Russia is not going to attack Poland, but to hit the aggressor in the teeth - please. If ukroreykh receives ATASMS and hits the Russian Federation, this fact can be considered as aggression by NATO. Since NATO weapons systems are used, NATO reconnaissance and target designation systems and NATO specialists.

                There is no need to be afraid, you just need to wait until the potentials in conventional weapons are equal, let's burn NATO tanks in Ukraine and then you can safely hit Zhevuch and turn screaming eagles into plucked roosters
                1. -2
                  11 January 2023 09: 16
                  Article 5 of NATO applies in the event of an "attack on one of the members of NATO"
                  Russia is not going to attack Poland, but please hit the aggressor in the teeth


                  Take off the pink glasses.
                  Dear Western partners, everything will be turned upside down, as usual, they are good at it, and in the eyes of the international community, it is Russia that will be the aggressor. The 5th article of NATO will be applied, do not hesitate.

                  and strike at the Russian Federation, this fact can be regarded as aggression on the part of NATO. Since NATO weapons systems are used, NATO reconnaissance and target designation systems and NATO specialists.


                  Good morning!
                  NATO has been killing our people and shooting at our lands since the first months of the war.
                  And?
    6. 0
      11 January 2023 07: 06
      Negotiations on the receipt of ATACMS operational-tactical missiles by Ukraine are in full swing
      And it is possible that in the end they will receive them, because. Americans have staked too much on this conflict, including their reputation. Interestingly, is it by chance that behind-the-scenes negotiations on the supply of tactical nuclear weapons are not yet underway? And that will become of them.
    7. +1
      11 January 2023 07: 10
      Looking back, we can make an unambiguous conclusion that ATACMS will be provided by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
      Question - when?
      There are two options:
      - when the end of the NWO will be visible and unambiguous in time. Then the Englishwoman must definitely shit.
      - when we have very significant goals that can decide in favor of the Anglo-Saxons negotiations on Ukraine.
      Therefore, we sit still, control the flow of military assistance and prepare for the guaranteed destruction of unpleasant surprises on the march.
    8. -2
      11 January 2023 07: 23
      Quote: Graz
      they will not blather, they are afraid, their ops are much closer to them and the Romanians and the Balts and the Poles


      You don't seem to understand what's going on. And what happens is that either we or they. And they understand this perfectly, unlike us. And because - they will go to the end.
      If Russia wins, the US will lose face. And dominion over the world. I repeat, they understand this very well, therefore they will not retreat, but will go for further escalation. They have potential. And he, as it happened, is a multiple of ours.
      1. +4
        11 January 2023 07: 30
        sorry, what do we have to lose? if they want to destroy us both as a country and as a Russian nation?
        We must strike first, that's the whole story
        1. -2
          11 January 2023 07: 34
          I want to say that over the past 30 years our leadership has made quite a few strategic mistakes that have led to the current situation.
          And now you are proposing to destroy human civilization because of our own mistakes?
          1. +1
            11 January 2023 07: 42
            And I agree with Putin
            in
            why do we need this world without Russia?
            This means that the enemies must be completely destroyed. and the rest of the world how lucky
            1. -3
              11 January 2023 07: 46
              It will not be this.
              The "enemies" still have many children of our leadership.
              No one will launch a nuclear attack on their child.
            2. -1
              11 January 2023 09: 21
              With such a number of warheads as we have, the whole world cannot be destroyed. And they answered us for sure ...
          2. +1
            11 January 2023 08: 08
            No "civilization" will be destroyed. Even "nuclear winter" is an unproven question. The modeling of the 70-80s, which was carried out by climatologists in this regard, is extremely "raw". The same volcanoes regularly emit much more emissions into the atmosphere, which, in fact, do not really affect the climate. But why the Americans and their European "tobacco" are afraid of our nuclear weapons is quite understandable. With mutual strikes, yes, and the collective West and the Russian Federation will be very "beaten". Moreover, if Europe and the United States actually cease to exist and slide into the Stone Age, then the Russian Federation has too much territory to destroy everything and everyone. But this is not the main thing: in the event of even a limited nuclear war, both the potential of the "collective West" and the potential of the Russian Federation will be severely undermined. And China, India and the same Indonesia will come forward. Japan does not count - it is highly dependent on external supplies and dependent on the Anglo-Saxons both in terms of military industry and in terms of resources. Anglo-Saxon Australia and New Zealand don't count at all. And after that, a bullet point can be put in the "collective West": both China and India will remember everything for their enemies. China will dictate to the "fallen West" whatever it wants. And the rest of the Western "singers" will join the strongest. That's what the West is afraid of - its complete and final fall. They don't care about Russia, but they love themselves very much. Fact.

            PS By the way, that is why the West is actively pedaling the topic of a military alliance between the Russian Federation and China, so that there is a reason to hit China if something happens. Now they have no reason to.
            1. -1
              11 January 2023 09: 37
              Yes, we have more territory, but there are fewer cities and industrial centers - after all, people do not live in an open field.
              1. 0
                12 January 2023 12: 02
                Yes, we have more territory, but there are fewer cities and industrial centers - after all, people do not live in an open field.

                10-15% of Russian citizens live far from the centers of their lives. IMHO.
            2. 0
              12 January 2023 11: 58
              PS By the way, that is why the West is actively pedaling the topic of a military alliance between the Russian Federation and China, so that there is a reason to hit China if something happens. Now they have no reason to.

              And in my opinion, the occasion doesn’t particularly bother them and never bothered them. Reputation is important when there is someone to evaluate it. Whose opinion are they worried about now? They only care about someone's strength.
    9. +1
      11 January 2023 07: 54
      When ours reach the Dnieper along the entire line, then we need to wait for imported gifts. "The territory of the DPR and LPR has not been officially written off by the striped people in favor of Russia, but if we trample on to Odessa and deep into the outskirts .... then everything is possible.
    10. 0
      11 January 2023 08: 56
      The Americans don’t want to transfer ATACMS long-range missiles to the public for the existing HIMARS MLRS, but they will transfer others. The Americans will frown strongly, but it’s not us ........ .
    11. 0
      11 January 2023 09: 38
      Earlier, Kyiv stated that for the Armed Forces to go on the offensive, at least 300 Western-made tanks, ATACMS missile systems and at least 10 Patriot air defense batteries are needed.

      And if you have 30 tanks and tomahawk missile systems, then you can probably even launch an offensive against China. I’m wondering, how many tanks have already been transferred to Ukraine from the stocks of the countries of the Eastern Bloc? And how are Ukrainians going to pay for new equipment? what currency? One Leopard costs more than 000 million euros.
    12. +1
      12 January 2023 10: 33
      Himars are catered for by foreigners. In the case of Atacams - even more so. This means that a blow to the territory of Russia will be a direct aggression of the States.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"