Military Review

State Duma deputy: Russian military changed tactics in the NVO zone

34
State Duma deputy: Russian military changed tactics in the NVO zone

The Russian military changed tactics in the NVO zone. Now they are fighting differently than at the beginning of the special operation.


This was stated in his Telegram channel by a member of the Defense Committee of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, General Andrey Gurulev.

The State Duma deputy claims that the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin and the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in the NVO zone Sergei Surovikin. According to Gurulev, this is due to the fact that during the special operation the Russian army learned how to fight.

Enemies write about the change in tactics of hostilities, this is true, but this is a study that took place during the conduct of hostilities, today, of course, our Armed Forces are working more efficiently

- declared the general.

Gurulev believes that the effectiveness of the strikes that the Russian Armed Forces inflict on the critical infrastructure of Ukraine has especially increased.

He also noted that the difficulties and failures during the special operation taught our military to take into account the consequences of the mistakes made, recognize them, analyze and draw appropriate conclusions.

Gurulev believes that the appointment of General Surovikin to the post of commander of the troops had a positive effect on the course of the special operation. The deputy said that this is also noted in Western countries, which, after his arrival, have increased military assistance to the Kyiv regime.

The United States provides the most significant support to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Gurulyov called the US military assistance to Ukraine "unprecedented."
Author:
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
34 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 9 January 2023 12: 30
    +13
    State Duma deputy claims that the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin and the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in the NVO zone Sergei Surovikin.
    fool "Sit down, I'll open it myself." VIKI, showed that his head is cooking, he deserves to be in the EP party:
    On June 10, 2013, a criminal case was initiated against Gurulev on charges of abuse of power. According to the investigation, in 2005 the chief of staff of the Southern Military District, Major General Nikolai Pereslegin, agreed with Colonel A.V. Gurulev, chief of staff of the 131st Guards Motorized Rifle Division of the Pechenga Division of the Siberian Military District, to illegally secondment a private and an ensign to his disposal. Both were absent for 2 years at the location of the unit, and A.V. Gurulev issued untrue orders about the departure of both on vacation and business trips and the assignment of military ranks. According to the testimony of a private and an ensign, they worked for N. Pereslegin, repairing furniture in his office apartment, guarding his private house in the Tver region and working in a company headed by his daughter and son-in-law[8]. Later, the criminal prosecution against A. V. Gurulev was terminated
    1. Alexga
      Alexga 9 January 2023 12: 38
      +10
      fool "Sit down, I'll open it myself."

      Telegram channels for deputies should probably be turned off. Recently, in an interview, he already began talking about the possibility of transferring nuclear weapons to Ukraine from the United States and training personnel to use them. Well, you can still hear this from the grandmother on the bench, but I don’t like hearing this from the general and the deputy. Why intimidate your people.
      1. Aerodrome
        Aerodrome 9 January 2023 14: 40
        +1
        The State Duma deputy claims that the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin and the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in the NVO zone Sergei Surovikin.
        deflection ... if the failure is no one's fault, if the shift is positive, there are "parents".
  2. SKVichyakow
    SKVichyakow 9 January 2023 12: 31
    +6
    But wasn’t it written earlier that it was necessary to hit critical infrastructure? Maybe there was simply no political will?
    1. Lawrence_OnYouNo
      Lawrence_OnYouNo 9 January 2023 12: 37
      +4
      Quote: SKVichyakow
      But wasn’t it written earlier that it was necessary to hit critical infrastructure?

      maybe, a year later, they will hit the bridges across the Dnieper? ....
      1. skeptic
        skeptic 9 January 2023 13: 14
        +1
        Quote: Lawrence_NaVasNo
        Quote: SKVichyakow
        But wasn’t it written earlier that it was necessary to hit critical infrastructure?

        maybe, a year later, they will hit the bridges across the Dnieper? ....

        What for? The troops of the Russian Federation will approach - the Ukrainians themselves will blow it up. Apparently the bosses "logic" is as follows. It's hard to understand from the outside. If you tear up the dam, higher than Kyiv, then the bridges and dams will be washed away to the Crimea. But in addition to the military effect, this will lead to a huge number of civilian casualties. It is quite possible that NATO troops are expected, then not only the bridges will fly into the air.
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 9 January 2023 12: 42
      +1
      At the VO, local "strategists" did not give any kind of advice, but only the military and political leadership on this site are not registered and do not graze around the clock. Otherwise, the Armed Forces of Ukraine would have capitulated long agolol
      1. Quote Lavrov
        Quote Lavrov 9 January 2023 12: 53
        +6
        But it is people from among the "local" strategists "", as you deigned to put it, who take part in the NWO, and not those who are much more likely to puff out their cheeks.
        Some, they cannot take out the language from one point, describing already that the change of tactics was a PERSONAL initiative ... (about HOW it has changed - not in this topic).
        That is, everyone around was to blame, and then some in white came and fixed everything ...
        You see, they would grazed (your expression) more on this site, and not among those who look into their eyes and assure them of their divine genius - maybe there would not be many mistakes that we encountered and are facing in reality, and not in obsequious reports.
        And who would say such a thing, but not Gurulev.
        1. SKVichyakow
          SKVichyakow 9 January 2023 13: 33
          0
          Quote: Quote Lavrov
          That is, everyone around was to blame, and then some in white came and fixed everything ...
          You look, they would grazed (your expression) more on this site, and not among those who look into their eyes and assure them of their divine genius - maybe there would not be many mistakes that we encountered and are facing in reality, and not in obsequious reports

          I think that they "graze". But since a lot depends on the "politician", not everything is decided. Perhaps, of course, these are coincidences, but I am inclined to the first.
    3. ABC-schutze
      ABC-schutze 9 January 2023 13: 10
      +2
      And in the decision-making centers of the Kyiv Natsiks. Since February 24th... From the first day of the NWO...

      And for the inhabitants of these rat houses ... And for all possible foreign "visitors" to them, agreeing on "supplies", if they are there at the time of the strikes ...

      But it is precisely the political will that is still lacking for this ... There are arguments about "high politics" ...
  3. Norbert
    Norbert 9 January 2023 12: 41
    +2
    Attention!
    deputy-general-evident, shows incredible analytical skills
    ps "it's scary, very scary. if we knew what it is, but we don't know what it is"
  4. FPEDDI_KPYGEP
    FPEDDI_KPYGEP 9 January 2023 12: 49
    +2
    The tactics were changed for the first time on March 10
    1. DMFalke
      DMFalke 14 January 2023 10: 44
      0
      Yes, it's stable. Either "new tactics", then a new commander. There are two options here:
      a) the problem is higher than the level of the commander of the SVO and the situation does not change from his rearrangement.
      b) the problem is not in tactics. and strategic planning, and again, nothing will change from a change in tactics - global goals either do not correspond, or correspond, but certainly not to our expectations.
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 9 January 2023 12: 50
    0
    The Russian military changed tactics in the NVO zone. Now they are fighting differently than at the beginning of the special operation.
    . If you want to live, you want to win, and not like that, you will grow up!!!
    Rough, cynical, but that's the way it is.
  6. Uprun
    Uprun 9 January 2023 12: 57
    0
    The charter of the guard service is written in blood, whoever served knows. To the deepest regret, the history of the NWO is not written in ink today ....., payment for mistakes ..........., well, it’s not worth continuing further .....
  7. APASUS
    APASUS 9 January 2023 12: 59
    -2
    Gurulev believes that the appointment of General Surovikin to the post of commander of the troops had a positive effect on the course of the special operation.

    Surovkin simply gave rise to the destruction of the Ukrainian economy. It remains to wait until bridges and power plants begin to smash to zero
    1. Quote Lavrov
      Quote Lavrov 9 January 2023 13: 03
      +5
      And what prevents him (well, since he gave rise to the destruction of the economy) to smash the infrastructure, the energy system "to zero", political, military leadership, data centers, financial centers, etc.?
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 10 January 2023 08: 07
        0
        Quote: Quote Lavrov
        And what prevents him (well, since he gave rise to the destruction of the economy) to smash the infrastructure, the energy system "to zero", political, military leadership, data centers, financial centers, etc.?

        Something interferes. Smash about a dozen bridges and cut off Western Ukraine from the country. Block the delivery of weapons from NATO, but it doesn’t happen
    2. ABC-schutze
      ABC-schutze 9 January 2023 13: 37
      0
      It's time to move on to an objective choice of priorities in the affected critical infrastructure...

      For example, I believe that the defeat of gas infrastructure facilities of the Kyiv regime, in order to collapse the remnants of its economic potential, is to "shift the focus" from the destruction of energy system facilities to the destruction of gas system facilities. From which gas is supplied to cogeneration CHPPs for the generation of electrical and thermal energy ... I.e. to deprive them of their MOST energy carrier for the long term ... Then they will not work without any "defeat" ...

      What is the difference?..

      Yes, in the fact that in the gas system, unlike the electrical system, the main, key value (objects) is underground ... These are underground gas pipelines at gas storage facilities and gas distribution stations at MAIN gas pipelines. Next, there are the control devices of distribution systems, including the corresponding gas pipelines ...

      Yes, it’s more difficult to “get” a gas “subway”, to destroy its gas pipelines and reservoirs (storages) that feed the main gas pipelines, you need damaging ammunition with a higher lethality ... And the distribution and regulatory infrastructure “at it”, is located, that’s all Yes, on the surface. And practically, "next to" ...

      "Fill up" all this, and the infrastructure of Ukrenergo will also stand up ...

      For this, the Russian military, when choosing targets for the destruction of the critical, energy infrastructure of the Kyiv Natsiks, it is worth ALREADY not so much to "consult" not "with each other" and not Putin (he, presumably, will have other questions to do).

      And with the Russian power engineers and gas workers. They "will not teach bad things", because they know the key objects and the "most painful points" of the corresponding systems thoroughly ... And also what means, forces, resources and time will be required to restore ...
    3. sadam2
      sadam2 9 January 2023 16: 47
      +2
      Well, how they smashed the hostel yesterday yesterday we all saw ...
      That's probably why the bridges don't start
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 10 January 2023 11: 58
        0
        Quote from Sadam2
        Well, how they smashed the hostel yesterday yesterday we all saw ...
        That's probably why the bridges don't start

        What did you saw ? What was reposted to you by TsIPSO. Just look at the maps of the hostel buildings and compare with what our publics publish, sheep
  8. Dilettante grandfather
    Dilettante grandfather 9 January 2023 13: 02
    +3
    He also noted that the difficulties and failures during the special operation taught our military to take into account the consequences of the mistakes made, recognize them, analyze and draw appropriate conclusions.
    This is a positive moment.
    But you need to learn BEFORE the start of the database, and not during.
  9. sanik2020
    sanik2020 9 January 2023 13: 02
    +3
    Gurulev believes that the effectiveness of the strikes that the Russian Armed Forces inflict on the critical infrastructure of Ukraine has especially increased.

    But don't wars begin with the destruction of this very infrastructure in order to deprive the enemy of the opportunity to resist?
    Why was this infrastructure not destroyed in the spring?
    Why has not one bridge and not one tunnel been destroyed in western Ukraine, through which the war is being fed from the west?
    How much more Western aid to Bandera must kill Russian soldiers and civilians in order to finally make the decision to stop it?
    And they talk about efficiency.
    1. DMFalke
      DMFalke 14 January 2023 11: 06
      -1
      Well, what are you, there is no war, and the rules for conducting the NWO, which are necessary, will be written later.
      If the infrastructure is standing, then there is an order not to touch it.
      If no one (contrary to the direct promise of the guarantor) touches bridges and trains with weapons, then there is an order not to touch.
      How much more? And how much is needed, so much will be put, the lives of people, neither their own nor those of others, under capitalism are worth nothing.
      And they speak in order to speak. That the people were calm and steadfast, endured the hardships of life and NWO with patriotism.
  10. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 9 January 2023 13: 21
    +3
    The State Duma deputy claims that the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin and the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in the NVO zone Sergei Surovikin.
    You can feel the words of an experienced apparatchik. Schweik comes to mind again lol
    On the lid of each box was a Hungarian Honved shaking hands with an Austrian militia, and above them was the shining crown of St. Stephen. On the rim was an inscription in Hungarian and German: "Für Kaiser, Gott und Vaterland" .
    The candy factory was so loyal that it gave preference to the emperor, putting him in front of the Lord God.
  11. Petr_Koldunov
    Petr_Koldunov 9 January 2023 13: 55
    +1
    The Russian military changed tactics in the NVO zone ...

    This is exactly the third time we hear these words... let's hope that this time it will lead to positive results (really, I really hope!!!).
  12. iouris
    iouris 9 January 2023 14: 43
    0
    It seems that the army is only now beginning to turn into a working system. It should strive to become an ever-working system.
    I formulated a maxim a long time ago and I repeat once again: "If you want peace, fight!" This is realpolitik. A state that does not fight is doomed. Therefore, one should treat the NWO (no matter how it proceeds) as the first real opportunity to save the state, and therefore the people, from the consequences of the "catastrophe". They will not be saved - well, that means such karma. So, we didn't make it.
  13. Arkady007
    Arkady007 9 January 2023 14: 49
    +3
    The mere expression "... the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin ..." General Andrei Gurulev, sounds at least like a deflection on the way up the career ladder.
  14. 28st region
    28st region 9 January 2023 15: 00
    +4
    State Duma deputy claims that the initiators of the change of tactics were Russian President Vladimir Putin and the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in the NVO zone Sergei Surovikin.

    I can’t understand anything what Shoigu is doing as Minister of Defense and what Gerasimov is doing together with the entire General Staff. It feels like they don't work at all.
    1. YOUR
      YOUR 9 January 2023 15: 04
      +3
      You are not the only one who has such an opinion.
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 9 January 2023 18: 24
      0
      Quote: 28st region
      I can’t understand anything what Shoigu is doing as Minister of Defense and what Gerasimov is doing together with the entire General Staff.

      The Minister of Defense in our country, and in many other countries, is a purely administrative position, not a command position, as they say now, he is a manager. But you need to ask Gerasimov and his department about the strategy.
  15. Private-K
    Private-K 9 January 2023 16: 38
    +2
    Blah blah blah blah... Nothing.
    And those military men who drove 10-500 soldiers into one building 600 km from the front line, did they learn to "fight in a new way"?
  16. Denis812
    Denis812 10 January 2023 09: 53
    0
    Here, many write about "why the bridges across the Dnieper were not destroyed."
    Because they cannot destroy. There is no super-devious plan behind this.
    They just can't destroy everything.
    We tried, don't you remember? Arrivals on the bridges were coming out. And more than once.
    But they did nothing at all.
    In the same way, the Armed Forces of Ukraine beat for weeks on the bridge near Kherson, after which the Russian Federation calmly withdrew troops to the other side of this very bridge.

    It would be more correct to say that bridges, like everything else, can be destroyed, but either nuclear weapons, or, if conventional ammunition, it will take so many missiles that it is more efficient to spend them on the same energy facilities. And there are clearly not enough missiles, no matter what the jingoists would write here, because otherwise the massive shelling would not stop at all.

    In general, it was only in a computer toy that he slammed one rocket across the bridge and it fell into dust. But in fact, destroying such objects, especially in the absence of complete control over the air, is extremely difficult.
  17. Dkuznecov
    Dkuznecov 10 January 2023 23: 36
    0
    Do not count your chickens before they are hatched.

    When the "Total" will be, then the decision-making centers
    will be pulled up under the results they decided ..

    When performing tasks, it is categorically not recommended to draw conclusions,
    if the solution method is not process.

    In our case, the algorithm is not a process one, and the resulting.
    So let's judge by the result,
    All the more - through year elections.