The head of the Ukrainian company "Energoatom" urged the UN to send peacekeepers to the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant

22
The head of the Ukrainian company "Energoatom" urged the UN to send peacekeepers to the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant

The head of the Ukrainian company Energoatom, Petr Kotin, called on the UN to deploy its peacekeeping contingent on the territory of the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in Energodar, without having previously reached any agreements with Russia on the security zone at the ZNPP.

According to the Reuters news agency, representatives of the Kyiv regime for the first time proposed to send peacekeeping forces to the territory of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, even without a preliminary agreement with Russia. Of course, they do not talk about the consequences of such a development of events. Recall that after the referendum on the reunification of the Zaporozhye region with Russia, the city of Energodar and the territory of the ZNPP belong to the Russian Federation.



Earlier, the head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, announced ongoing consultations with the Russian and Ukrainian sides on the creation of a security zone around the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant and a cessation of shelling of the nuclear facility. However, the parties failed to reach any agreements.

According to the head of the Ukrainian "Energoatom", the representatives of Kyiv intend to discuss the ways by which it will be possible to raise the issue of bringing a peacekeeping contingent to Russian territory at a meeting of the UN Security Council.

Located on the left bank of the Dnieper in Energodar (Zaporozhye region of Russia), ZNPP is the largest in Europe in terms of the number of power units and generated capacity. The station has six blocks, each of which generates 1 gigawatt.

The forces of the Kyiv regime regularly shell the territory of the power plant and the adjacent city of Energodar. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu stressed that the Ukrainian authorities are thus trying to create the appearance of a threat of a nuclear catastrophe. The IAEA has repeatedly noted the need to create a security zone around the ZNPP territory.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    4 January 2023 17: 48
    Place them closer to the reactor core, if anything, so that they are browned.
    1. +5
      4 January 2023 18: 44
      Quote: al3x
      Place them closer to the reactor core, if anything, so that they are browned.

      In the morning, UN troops will enter the ZNPP (we read NATO), and in the evening the Nazis of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will enter.
      1. +1
        4 January 2023 19: 04
        Russia has the right of veto in the UN Security Council and nuclear missiles - UN peacekeepers will not be able to enter the territory of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.
  2. +12
    4 January 2023 17: 50
    We still lacked blue helmets from blue Europe on our territory. We can handle it ourselves!
  3. +4
    4 January 2023 17: 52
    Only if directly into the destroyed reactor in Chernobyl (Lavrov's phrase)
  4. +5
    4 January 2023 17: 57
    Although they are thrice holy peacekeepers, they are primarily a foreign military contingent. Arriving in a disputed territory without a treaty, especially in a war zone, would be direct intervention and a declaration of war, as if there was nothing to be done. Well, or bang these peacekeepers even before the approach. Why do Ukrainians have so many stupid people who just don't want to understand basic things.
    1. +2
      4 January 2023 18: 19
      Quote: Mint Gingerbread
      Why do Ukrainians have so many stupid people who just don't want to understand basic things.

      Victims of the exam, however. The Ukrainian USE is even worse than the Russian one. )))
    2. +4
      4 January 2023 18: 22
      Quote: Mint Gingerbread
      Although they are thrice holy peacekeepers, they are primarily a foreign military contingent. Arriving in a disputed territory without a treaty, especially in a war zone, would be direct intervention and a declaration of war, as if there was nothing to be done. Well, or bang these peacekeepers even before the approach. Why do Ukrainians have so many stupid people who just don't want to understand basic things.

      This area is not disputed. According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, this is the territory of Russia.
  5. +9
    4 January 2023 17: 59
    There are already peacekeepers there.
    Our.
    And since we are one of the founders of the UN, then these are peacekeepers, you can say the UN, if he so wants ....
    And NATO "peacekeepers" have nothing to do there, and any others.
    This is Russian territory, and everyone we did not invite there should be disposed of on compost.
  6. +4
    4 January 2023 18: 02
    You just need to place IAEA employees in tents on the roof of the ZNPP, maybe Macron can come to them
    1. +2
      4 January 2023 18: 08
      You just need to place IAEA employees in tents on the roof of the ZNPP, maybe Macron can come to them
      Just before that, gouge out their eyes and cut off their ears. They still don't see or hear anything. And so at least they will not spy.
  7. +4
    4 January 2023 18: 04
    As I understand it, they need to stick themselves in the territory of the nuclear power plant for targeting, as in the Donbass? Svolota.
  8. +2
    4 January 2023 18: 07
    for the first time made a proposal to send peacekeeping forces to the ZNPP territory
    ...peacekeepers are already there...or have they forgotten who has the right to appoint peacekeepers in Yoyoung's community
  9. +1
    4 January 2023 18: 08
    Alexander Grigoryevich, your way out. You are our peacemaker.
  10. +2
    4 January 2023 18: 14
    The head of the Ukrainian company "Energoatom" urged the UN to send peacekeepers to the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant
    . Pull an owl over the globe... that's all there is to say about such initiatives.
  11. 0
    4 January 2023 18: 15
    And what does this head of something have to do with the Zaporizhzhya NPP? I would walk through the forest.
  12. +3
    4 January 2023 18: 24
    Yeah, and the key to the apartment where the money is.
    With the same success, dill may demand the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent into the territory, for example, the Kursk nuclear power plant.
  13. +1
    4 January 2023 18: 50
    UN peacekeepers are formed on the basis of a Security Council resolution. Clearly, there will be no such resolution. But for three months everyone predicted an agreement.
  14. ANB
    0
    4 January 2023 19: 16
    So let the Ukrainians for the time being their territory and introduce peacekeepers. In Zaporozhye there and the surrounding area.
  15. 0
    4 January 2023 19: 22
    I don’t understand why questions concerning any actions and movements on Russian territory should be discussed with the Ukrainian side?
  16. 0
    4 January 2023 21: 28
    If our Russian peacekeepers had not been near the ZNPP, half a year ago a cloud of a man-made accident would have been flying over the European part of the mainland.
    And Russians, Ukrainians, and Eastern Europeans would die.
    America, Canada, Australia, Japan, Great Britain, France... These countries would express their regrets by rubbing their sweaty little hands.
    Not the peoples of these countries, but the governments.
  17. 0
    9 January 2023 21: 14
    "Kyiv's representatives intend to discuss ways by which it will be possible to raise the issue of bringing a peacekeeping contingent into Russian territory at a meeting of the UN Security Council"
    How is it to introduce "peacekeepers" into Russian territory? Who will let them go? Who invited them? Guests are invited to their own home, not someone else's. Bandits come to someone else's house without an invitation. Do these Danilyaks-Podaliaks have any education?
    Here's how Lavrov communicate with these figures? It is necessary to demand an equivalent member of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and not Kulebov and Melnikov, and that they be dressed according to the protocol and not like underfence punks.
    Damn, I'm shocked. This is what American education means.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"