The representative of the State Department said about the concern of the United States in connection with the negotiations between the President of the Russian Federation and the Chairman of the People's Republic of China

23
The representative of the State Department said about the concern of the United States in connection with the negotiations between the President of the Russian Federation and the Chairman of the People's Republic of China

The talks held on the eve of the video format between the President of Russia and the President of China, as it turns out, caused concern among the US authorities. This was directly stated in the US State Department. A US foreign policy spokesman said that "Washington is concerned that Beijing is violating its proclaimed principle of political neutrality by negotiating and providing support to Russia."

At the US State Department:



Beijing has repeatedly stated that it adheres to the principle of political neutrality. But his behavior clearly demonstrates that this is not the case, and that he is invested in and maintains close ties with Russia.

Another manifestation of the mentoring tone on the part of the United States, which, apparently, has already finally convinced itself that they should act as a global arbiter, or rather, a gendarme, who also determines how, to whom and by what principles in the modern world can cooperate.

From a statement by a US State Department spokesman:

We express concern that the Chinese leadership is engaging in contacts of this kind with the leadership of Russia. We and the European Union have warned Beijing about the consequences for it if Russia provides military assistance against Ukraine, as well as help to circumvent sanctions.

The representative of the American department announced that the United States is closely monitoring the actions of Beijing.

Recall that on the eve of Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping agreed to meet in person. It will take place as part of the next visit of the Chinese leader to Russia in 2023.
  • Russian President's website
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    31 December 2022 09: 04
    Of course, ideally, the military-economic union of Russia and China is important, but there are no eternal allies in the world, and Russia will have to rely only on itself. China is too economically tied to the West, and here, with all our desire, we will not be able to replace their market, so there will be a balancing of interests.
    1. +2
      31 December 2022 09: 37
      Russia and China still have quite a few geopolitical contradictions. It is unlikely that China will become a full-fledged ally in the foreseeable future. The main thing here is not to be the right companion, who will be dropped off at the next stop.
    2. 0
      31 December 2022 11: 17
      As if Russia is not tied to the West in any way... It would be nice to see who is bigger, of course, commensurate with the scale of the economies.
      1. +1
        31 December 2022 22: 05
        You are mistaken ... Cooperation between China and the Russian Federation is strengthening and will continue to be so from now on, even if the West and the fifth (and sixth ...) Russian column do not like it ....
  2. +3
    31 December 2022 09: 07
    China is waiting. He is waiting for a more convenient moment to make his move for sure, 100% guaranteed.
  3. +5
    31 December 2022 09: 07
    What a grief the United States has, they don’t know what Putin V.V. and Xi Jinping were talking about. They don’t report, they completely ignored them.
    1. +3
      31 December 2022 09: 40
      Blinken tried to find out from Wang Yi the essence of the negotiations between Medvedev and Xi, yelled at Wang Yi, the wise old Wang Yi just sent an Eastern American on the eve of retirement. Now the Yankees are more careful, but they are also trying to probe the position of the PRC "from the opposite" (by asking questions in a public plane through provocative statements)
      1. 0
        31 December 2022 22: 10
        Quote: Fisherman
        Blinken tried to find out from Wang Yi...

        ---
        Not from Vanya, but from Ivan ...
  4. +2
    31 December 2022 09: 09
    The point is. that they have not yet understood that they themselves have put themselves in such a position - they will negotiate a new world order without them. The consequences of American infantilism are used to "what I want, I turn back, and nothing will happen to me for it." The problem is that Russia and China are ancient countries, they have already been seen. Such countries remain forever young, because they die out in the process - no one negotiates with them, making sure that they do not fulfill the agreements. And that's all - fluff and there is no former empire. Only countries that do not threaten the existence of all neighbors in general survive. Sooner or later, the neighbors of such "super predators" are allowed on the rug
    1. -8
      31 December 2022 09: 19
      Quote from Bingo
      will negotiate a new world order without them.

      Do you yourself believe in it? It is possible to negotiate, for example, without Ukraine, but without a p and n d stop, it will not work to agree on a new world order. hi
      1. +2
        31 December 2022 09: 47
        Quote: LIONnvrsk
        Do you yourself believe in that?

        I believe. It's just that we were taught this at the university... When an empire collapses, there is no one to negotiate with. The centripetal forces disappear, but the centrifugal forces suppressed by them immediately break away for all the time when they were suppressed. You can see what happened to internationalism in the USSR - a vivid example. And the US empire is already bye-bye, the border, when it ended, has already been passed, now it is already in the phase of disintegration.
        So they will decide without the states, without the states. They will put a signature under the documents in order to simply participate in this, but their opinion will influence in the range from "no one asked at all" to "heard? Now go, free"
        In the near future they will pupate in the North American zone, and then - who knows. Either collapse or a new structure, this one is completely unviable
        1. +1
          31 December 2022 10: 02
          Quote from Bingo
          And the US empire is already bye-bye, the border, when it ended, has already been passed, now it is already in the phase of disintegration.
          So they will decide without the states, without the states. They will put a signature under the documents in order to simply participate in this, but their opinion will influence in the range from "no one asked at all" to "heard? Now go, free"
          In the near future they will pupate in the North American zone, and then - who knows. Either collapse or a new structure, this one is completely unviable

          This is in the perspective of 30-40 years.
          And that's not a fact.
          And you present it as if it will happen next year.
          I'm surprised uni didn't teach you that.
          1. +3
            31 December 2022 10: 34
            Quote: Architect
            And you present it as if it will happen next year.

            It's already happened. The union, for example, did not break up in 1991, this is the date of the OFFICIAL termination, legally - in general after 2 years, but it broke up before the Foros holidays, the same Georgia was independent at that time. And now the States are already agonizing.
            An example - imagine that you are Xi, it's easier, if you talk about the Russian Federation - it will start out of business ... Here you need to agree with the United States on a new world order. Only from the USA. Who will you negotiate with? And all - not with anyone. The agreement with Bidon is not worth a damn. With the Democrats - too, with the Republicans - too ... Do you understand? There seems to be an amorphous structure, but there is no one to talk to. This vacuum of power is called - there is no power. That is, there is no country. Strange - and how did they teach me this after all?
        2. -2
          31 December 2022 10: 35
          Quote from Bingo
          We were taught this at uni...

          In which?! University of Marxism-Leninism? wink
          Quote from Bingo
          They will put a signature under the documents in order to simply participate in this, but their opinion will influence in the range from "no one asked at all" to "heard? Now go, free"

          Eka you skidded! Also say that we will throw hats!
          Before us is a strong, rich, dodgy, unprincipled enemy who will not give up his positions without a fight....
          So, if you "negotiate", then it will be very difficult, and even more so without them.
    2. +2
      31 December 2022 09: 29
      Of course, they will express concern, the PRC is watching how we are taking American, Western money in our economy. Legally. They will receive a maximum of 50% of the real value, and our "independent experts" will announce the real value. There is a lot of American money in the PRC. Cool Decree Putin VV signed yesterday.
  5. +5
    31 December 2022 09: 17
    If you are against it, then everything is done correctly! Waiting for messages when they say the same about our economy!
  6. +8
    31 December 2022 09: 26
    Honestly, I am pleased to read that the Yankees are concerned. After all, the more a person is preoccupied with something, the more his attention is focused on this subject, and he misses many other things. I wish the Americans in the new year to attend to the complete collapse of their country.
    1. +5
      31 December 2022 09: 43
      I sincerely support your wish! hi drinks
  7. +1
    31 December 2022 09: 56
    So the time has come when the United States "expresses concern" ... from powerlessness to influence Russia and China.
  8. 0
    31 December 2022 10: 41
    it's time to create a military bloc with China, India, Iran, Cuba, Syria, Venezuela, Nicaragua, North Korea, and all countries wishing to join a bloc against NATO, and it's time to transfer the war to the United States and Israel, until California and Florida will not fall and rockets will not explode; Miami Los Angeles and Tel Aviv should look like Beirut Aleppo Belgrade and Donetsk-Jews and Britons need to return the death and devastation that they have done in these cities
  9. 0
    31 December 2022 12: 08
    I wonder in which part Washington itself adheres to the principle of "political neutrality" in the conflict in Ukraine?
  10. 0
    31 December 2022 12: 37
    We express concern that the Chinese leadership is engaging in contacts of this kind with the leadership of Russia. We and the European Union have warned Beijing about the consequences for it if Russia provides military assistance against Ukraine, as well as help to circumvent sanctions.


    The Americans are really trying to threaten us! What else can they do? To enter into direct war with us?

    If this is an economic war using technology, then the Yankees used all possible means many years ago.
  11. 0
    31 December 2022 22: 11
    Quote: LIONnvrsk
    Quote from Bingo
    will negotiate a new world order without them.

    Do you yourself believe in it? It is possible to negotiate, for example, without Ukraine, but without a p and n d stop, it will not work to agree on a new world order. hi

    ----
    Get it... Don't worry too much about the pin....stop.
  12. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"