Soviet Civilization: Reasons for Success

113
Soviet Civilization: Reasons for Success
The signing of the Treaty on the formation of the USSR at the I All-Union Congress of Soviets. Hood. S. I. Dudnik


Catastrophe


The Russian Revolution of 1917 had two sides.



On the one hand, it was the completion of the Romanov project, oriented towards the West, which ruined it. The Revolution and the Russian Troubles became a natural process of painful, decaying processes that were going on in the Russian Empire. In particular, the split of the Russian people into two opposite parts.

The first - educated Russian-Europeans - first the nobles, then the intelligentsia, raznochintsy, capitalists, who used Russian civilization as a colony for their prosperity. Narrow estates and social groups whose language was German, French and English. Well educated and wealthy. Often living in Western Europe more than in the "wretched" Mother Russia.

In general, the caste that suffered so much in the new democratic-liberal, pro-Western Russia of the 1990-2000 model was the new Russians. A group of "successful" gentlemen who succeeded in plundering the ruins of the USSR and settled well in the economically and culturally peripheral in relation to the countries of the "golden billion" of the Russian Federation. Hence the tears for "old Russia".

The second group is the vast majority of the people. Russia was a peasant country (90% of the population) even at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. This world remained in the Middle Ages - an almost subsistence economy, traditions and way of life. The people kept in folklore the memory of the "golden age", when there were no chosen ones, they sang their heroes - Ilya Muromets, Stenka Razin and Emelyan Pugachev.

This terrible gap led to a catastrophe. Trouble is a special mechanism of purification, transition of the Russian world, when an opportunity opens up for building a new civilization, more just than it was before. Closer to the ideal of a Russian person. City of Kitezh. The world of justice and the rule of the ethics of conscience.

At the same time, the Russian Revolution was the result of skillful, purposeful, and cunning efforts by diverse foreign forces. Our then Western "partners". Western governments, intelligence agencies, intelligence agencies, lodge orders, diplomats and the military. Germany, France, England, and the United States sought to prevent the transformation of the Russian Empire into a superpower of the XNUMXth century. Into a victorious power that cannot be stopped.

Russians in Tsargrad-Constantinople were a horror for Westerners. The prerequisites for this were: a healthy and rapidly growing population, the entire periodic table in the bowels, the beginnings of the best education and culture in the world.

In essence, the tsars had to do what the Bolsheviks then did - the elimination of illiteracy, universal education, the creation of the best science in the world, forced industrialization with an emphasis on the development of heavy industry, the accelerated development of the army and fleet (our only allies). And the rate is on a human creator, a creator, and not a slave-consumer, as in the West.

Red project


"World revolution", "internationalism" and Marxism came to Russia from the West. With their help, they wanted to subdue the Russian world to the Western world, to the system of capitalism, which was again in crisis and required expansion in order to preserve itself. The masters of Paris, London and Washington needed Russian wealth in order to build a “new world order”: a global capitalist, in essence, a slave-owning civilization.

That is why the internationalist revolutionaries hated everything Russian so much. They divided the Russian super-ethnos into three parts - actually Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. Everything Russian was banned. Destroyed the Russian history, culture and faith. Our history was denigrated, all Russian national heroes suddenly became reactionaries, oppressors and colonizers. A global experiment has begun to recode Russians, to destroy their Russianness.

However, the Westernizers and the revolutionary internationalists miscalculated. The process got out of control of the West. There were real Russian communists in the bowels of the Bolshevik Party. Bearers of the image of a possible and desirable new world in the interests of the majority of the people. "Golden Age" - Communism. That is, society-communities living on the basis of social justice and conscience.

This is a Russian code matrix. Therefore, the mass of the people supported the Bolsheviks. Even half of the tsarist General Staff and the officer corps followed the Reds, building a new Russian army - the Red Army. They realized that only the Bolsheviks could save the country and the people. Build a new, more just civilization.

Thus, the ideals of communism were at the same time the ideals of Russian civilization and the people. Communism stood on the primacy of honest labor, was against parasitism, the spirit of robbery, looting and appropriation (that is, against the old world of capitalism). Communism stood on knowledge, creation, human creativity. Factories, laboratories, space rockets and houses of culture against taverns, brothels and poverty, spiritual and material. The red project has absorbed the basic codes for Russian civilization and people - justice, the primacy of truth over law, the spiritual principle over the material.

The Bolsheviks had energy, will, faith and a project for a brighter future. Therefore, they became the only force that could establish life on the ashes of the old civilization and the Russian state. They created a new world, a reality connected with the old, but fundamentally new.

Soviet civilization-starship


After a stubborn struggle, the Russian national project, which personified the Georgians of Russian nationality, Stalin took up. He refused to sacrifice Russia to the "world revolution". He sent most of the demon-possessed revolutionaries-internationalists and Trotskyists to the inferno (mystery of 1937). Broke the main instrument of Western dominance in Russia. He killed the "fifth column" on the eve of a new world war, which was caused by the capitalist world in crisis. He began the implementation of great creative projects that were transforming Russia before our very eyes. Created the world's best science and education system. He transformed culture, banishing cosmopolitanism-Westernism.

The Soviet Union became a civilization of labor, social justice and strength. The masters of the West again threw Germany at us, gave her almost all of Western Europe, her resources. But the renewed Russia turned out to be ready for a brutal war and, despite all its horrors and heavy losses, emerged from the Great War even stronger. The Anglo-Saxons "mastered" the defeated Western Europe, Western Germany and Japan. But the USSR turned out to be too tough for them.

A civilization of the future has arisen on the planet, a society of service and creation. Inspired people learned, learned, created, created and built. Hence the unparalleled in history breakthrough of the USSR-Russia in the sphere of culture, science, education and economy. Leap into space. The Union showed the main way to save all mankind - going beyond the Earth, space exploration. Knowledge of the world.

Soviet civilization has become an alternative to Western parasitic society, predatory capitalism. A world aspiring to the future, where man was a creator, not a slave.

USSR-2


In the context of the next crusade of the West against the Russian world, when Little Rus' - Russian Ukraine became the battlefield, it is necessary to stop playing by the rules of the enemy. Get out of the trap into which the current top of the Russian Federation, the state and the people have been driven. To understand that we were all sentenced to dismemberment, robbery and, as a result, to the destruction of Russianness, Russian civilization and people.

A possible way out is to recreate the renewed USSR. The core of the USSR-2 could be the Union State of Russia and Belarus with the probable accession of all peoples - the heirs of the USSR and the Russian Empire. Other constituent parts of the new Russian Union are Novorossiya (Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye, Kherson regions, Crimea, with the subsequent annexation of the regions of the Left Bank liberated from Ukrainian Nazis and global fascists), and in the future Little Russia with the center in the Russian city of Kyiv. Simultaneously at all levels to announce and implement the idea of ​​the division of the Russian superethnos, the unity of Russians-Great Russians and Ukrainians-Little Russians.

Renounce Westernism in culture, return to the path of socialism, ceasing to be the periphery of the capitalist world. The path is difficult, full of labors, battles and accomplishments, but there is no other way. Time to wake up! Everyone! Otherwise we will be crushed!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    30 December 2022 03: 41
    It is also interesting how we will return to the path of socialism, if the "chief" is not so flattering about it, and almost all the bureaucratic brethren are against ???
    1. 0
      30 December 2022 03: 59
      Have you ever heard of "Swedish socialism"?
      1. +10
        30 December 2022 04: 42
        Heard. But they do not have a pipe and leeches stuck to it. In addition to Swedish socialism, there is also Chinese, which, it seems to me, is closer to our incomprehensible oligarchic system. The oligarchs would still have to do.
        1. +4
          30 December 2022 09: 39
          The oligarchs would still have something to do.
          - the choice is quite large - Severnaya Zemlya, the New Siberian Islands, the vast taiga with the tundra of Eastern Siberia. The main thing is to send people to where there are fewer or no people at all, as in Vysotsky's song ".. forward five hundred, back five hundred .."
          1. +2
            30 December 2022 10: 29
            Quote: faiver
            The oligarchs would still have something to do.
            - the choice is quite large - Severnaya zemlya, New Siberian Islands, vast taiga with tundra of Eastern Siberia

            It is too far. Taganka will be enough ...
            1. +2
              30 December 2022 11: 32
              It is too far.
              - just not, in civilization, the employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service have too many temptations ...
            2. +2
              30 December 2022 20: 54
              Shoot them and that's it!

              And confiscate all the loot.
              1. 0
                24 March 2023 14: 44
                What about work? At least partially compensate for the damage for a bowl of gruel?
          2. +6
            30 December 2022 11: 33
            Quote: faiver
            - the choice is quite large - Severnaya zemlya, New Siberian Islands, vast taiga with tundra of Eastern Siberia

            These are dreams, and the reality is the State Duma.
          3. Qas
            +5
            31 December 2022 01: 30
            This is a utopia. A good story that will never come true. The system has been built for many years. Its (system) builders are on top and are not going to get off. Remember the words of the GDP about galoshes. And they will resettle themselves in Kolyma?
        2. 0
          31 December 2022 21: 07
          28th region. Under normal power, oligarchs can be made into goldfish for the fulfillment of desires and a very large aquarium for their living.
      2. +9
        30 December 2022 05: 24
        Have you ever heard of "Swedish socialism"?
        was such .. as a "showcase" as opposed to the USSR. Whatever the mob would not buzz and nod in our direction - "but how they are ..!" And where is he now?
        1. +13
          30 December 2022 08: 12
          was such .. as a "showcase" as opposed to the USSR. Whatever the mob would not buzz and nod in our direction - "but how they are ..!" And where is he now?
          In the same place as their Prime Minister Olof Palme, who was simply shot on the street.
      3. +11
        30 December 2022 06: 44
        Have you ever heard of "Swedish socialism"?

        ..So they built it or not? Or still under construction? smile Or are they in the next stage, making the transition from Swedish socialism to Swedish communism? smile
        1. +7
          30 December 2022 10: 35
          Quote: parusnik
          Or are they in the next stage, making the transition from Swedish socialism to Swedish communism?

          They are in the reverse stage of transition from developed capitalism to standard capitalism, as in the whole world ...
      4. +5
        30 December 2022 08: 10
        As well as Chinese, Arabic. There is Christian and even say liberal socialism ....
        1. -2
          30 December 2022 11: 00
          Quote: Gardamir
          There is Christian and even say liberal socialism ....

          It happens that life connects completely incompatible things, and therefore the term itself - Christian socialism, is absolutely absurd, like similar socialism itself. Christianity and socialism cannot be brought together.
          "My kingdom is not of this world", where the source of evil is not wealth, high ranks and titles, but the sinful disposition of the soul, and where there are also many evil and sinful people among the poor.
          "Beat the bourgeoisie", man-gods, expropriation of the expropriators.
          Is it compatible.
          1. +10
            30 December 2022 16: 06
            Quote: bober1982
            Christianity and socialism cannot be brought together.

            1) The first Christian community lived just in a small socialism.
            2) Church of Christ does not deal with the socio-economic structure of society. And your statement about the "incompatibility of Christianity and socialism" is based on the extremism of the revolutionaries of the 20s and 30s of the 20th century. And also on the hatred of the Februaryists-White Guards for the Bolsheviks.
            And socialism .. just as a just and good socio-economic order of society, does not in the least interfere with the life of the Church. The persecution of the Church is not socialism .. but militant materialism. Be it the bourgeois Jacobinism of the French Revolution... or the like.
            1. -3
              31 December 2022 19: 56
              Quote: ammunition
              And also on the hatred of the Februaryists-White Guards for the Bolsheviks.

              And, of course, the White Guard ataman Dutov ordered the execution of warrant officer Timofey Kirpichnikov, an active participant in the February events, the idol of the crowd.
              What connection can there be between the Februaryists (the Cadets, the Octobrists) and the White Guards?
              Quote: ammunition
              The persecution of the Church is not socialism .. but militant materialism. Be it the bourgeois Jacobinism of the French Revolution... or the like.

              ..... or the like.
              Roman emperors, perhaps, that the first Christians were thrown into cages with lions.
              Or, Satanists, such as Trotsky, Sverdlov, Yaroslavsky.
              Militant materialism will disappear, but the persecution of the Church has been, is and will be, and that is how the Church lives.
            2. -3
              31 December 2022 20: 39
              Quote: ammunition
              Be it the bourgeois Jacobinism of the French Revolution..

              By the way, where did it come from - in French Jacobinism, was there anything bourgeois? Satanism was, in its purest form, examples - just darkness.
        2. +1
          30 December 2022 21: 43
          they even say liberal socialism ....

          Yes, there is. Here it is
          https://vk.com/@romanavdeevv-gibel-kalifornii
      5. +7
        30 December 2022 09: 40
        Quote: Aristarkh Pasechnik
        Have you ever heard of "Swedish socialism"?


        This option will not work for us.
        For starters, you need to be like Sweden for 200 years away from wars. But the Russian bear is not a Swedish hamster, you won't be able to wait out in a mink.

        And it’s not socialism at all, just capitalism, to which the plasticity of the muzzle was made and some of the fangs were removed. In the future, the local society will be more and more liberal.
        Socially-oriented states in Europe - the finish line is coming. The bourgeois played there in "it is necessary to share" - and that's enough. There aren't enough pies for everyone.
        1. +6
          30 December 2022 12: 40
          The bourgeois played there in "it is necessary to share" - and that's enough.
          The point is not the bourgeois, but the fact that the number of people who want to be shared with them has grown (and is growing) like an avalanche. But social programs in the states of the West are not curtailed at the same time.
      6. +8
        30 December 2022 10: 33
        Quote: Aristarkh Pasechnik
        "Swedish socialism"?

        The golden age of "Swedish socialism" fell on the heyday of the USSR. Coincidence? Or maybe the rise of the middle class in Europe in the 50s and 70s is also a coincidence? And its systematic destruction all over the world after the collapse of the USSR is also probably a coincidence ...
      7. +4
        30 December 2022 12: 26
        about "Swedish socialism"?
        There are fewer Swedes than Muscovites (by 20%). Won't take off.
      8. +2
        30 December 2022 23: 32
        Only at the same time in Sweden the most ordinary capitalism with a "human face".
    2. +5
      30 December 2022 10: 29
      Quote: marchcat
      is not flattering about this, and almost all the bureaucratic brethren are against ???

      So Nikolai and co were also against it...
    3. +2
      31 December 2022 01: 08
      the "chief" does not speak about socialism in any way, but first of all, Russia needs to restore the sovereignty lost in the 91st year, and only then decide whether it is necessary to socialize all property or not, for example, in China there is a lot of private property ...
    4. 0
      31 December 2022 11: 19
      if the "chief" is not so flattering about it, and almost all the bureaucratic brethren are against it?

      And we are obliged to take into account their opinion?? what
    5. 0
      4 January 2023 10: 38
      Our Chief is a smart man. And as soon as the population turns onto the road "to socialism", they will immediately react correctly. And do not identify Putin with the oligarchs. They needed money to pay off external debts, which, by the way, neither Gorbachev nor Yeltsin could agree on with the oligarchs - including the worthless "managers". As well as no political leaders.
      And Putin did it. And he distributed the external debts of Russia and paid the delayed salaries and "fed" the population in the end. And whoever does not see this is simply blind in life.
  2. +4
    30 December 2022 04: 49
    Communism is the only social formation capable of opening the way to the stars and preserving Mankind as a species.
    1. +10
      30 December 2022 06: 58
      up took the Russian national project, which personified the Georgians of Russian nationality Stalin.
      1. +14
        30 December 2022 09: 05
        Congratulations to everyone who lived, remembers, and honors that Civilization. One hundred years since the formation of the USSR ..
    2. -6
      30 December 2022 23: 34
      How did humanity live without communism, and for most of its life? Moreover, such categorical statements as the only social formation definitely require proof.
      1. +2
        31 December 2022 11: 23
        How did humanity live without communism, and for most of its life?

        That's what it means not to read the classics .. Throughout its history, from its inception to the beginning of the Neolithic, humanity lived precisely under communism .. True, primitive, based on extremely low consumption and production of material goods. When oppressing your neighbor simply did not make sense - what will you get from him? But this does not change the essence of public consciousness in any way. So - this is capitalism and others like it, a perversion of human essence ..
        1. -4
          1 January 2023 21: 25
          True primitive, based on extremely low consumption and production of material goods. When oppressing your neighbor simply did not make sense - what will you get from him?


          It is necessary not to read the classics (you are probably talking about Engels) in such discussions, but it is worth listening to / reading scientists, for example, the paleoanthropologist Drobyshevsky.

          So - this is capitalism and others like it, a perversion of human essence ..


          Capitalism is just the development of society, when society has become more complex than a primitive tribe. Or do you want to return to tribal relations and gather again? Well, the human essence is a super spherical teapot in a vacuum. .
    3. kpd
      +4
      31 December 2022 07: 46
      Alas, communism has one problem - it requires people to have communist self-consciousness, but there are big problems with this and whether they can be solved is completely unclear.
  3. -1
    30 December 2022 05: 22
    That is why the internationalist revolutionaries hated everything Russian so much. They divided the Russian super-ethnos into three parts - actually Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. Everything Russian was banned.

    Well, yes, then the Romanovs were Russophobes, they divided the "Russian superethnos" into Great Russians, Little Russians, Belarusians. And they destroyed everything Russian, namely the enemies of the Bolsheviks who captured the USSR.
    1. -3
      30 December 2022 15: 11
      That is, the Bolsheviks? - after all, the Bolsheviks destroyed the USSR
  4. +5
    30 December 2022 05: 37
    "Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man, and socialism is the opposite" ... (c)
    W. Churchill
  5. +2
    30 December 2022 05: 44
    With all due respect to the author, the USSR and its achievements, all calls to restore, return, wake up are nostalgic reflections. We saw the result of the civilization of the USSR in 1991. Heaven on earth cannot be built, and the "Towers of Babel" will be destroyed. "Acquire the spirit of peace and thousands around you will be saved."
    1. TIR
      +5
      30 December 2022 08: 19
      Let's be honest and not try to wishful thinking. The USSR collapsed not "suddenly", but was systematically destroyed from within. In 1991, the collapse was inevitable. Yes, it was that real USSR that was not stillborn. Until 1954, it was just communism. Further, capitalist ideas began to penetrate into communism. First, to the upper echelons of power, then down the social pyramid. By 1991, these ideas had already embraced the entire population. That is, by the collapse of the country, society had long been destroyed. This suggests that communism as an idea is weaker than capitalism, or that society simply has not yet matured in its development.
      1. -4
        30 December 2022 23: 50
        The USSR collapsed not "suddenly", but was systematically destroyed from within.


        So let's be more honest, the USSR was a closed state with a single party, ideology, and since it turned out to be so easy to break up from the inside, this speaks of problems in the system itself. In the United States, over the 70 years of the existence of the USSR, 11 presidents have changed and nothing has happened to the state, but in the USSR, according to your comment, everything went downhill after the death of Stalin, in fact, on the second leader.

        This suggests that communism as an idea is weaker than capitalism, or that society simply has not yet matured in its development.


        With the current development of society, capitalism as an idea is certainly more attractive and viable.
      2. +1
        4 January 2023 10: 54
        Of course, if you do not take into account the work of the Anglo-Saxon special services, but of the entire West. Starting with the poisonings and murders of officials, from Ivan the Terrible to this day. And do not take into account those billions to bribe imperial officials, and who are still being paid.
        Then, of course, the USSR collapsed itself.
  6. 0
    30 December 2022 06: 14
    this is what I just read ... blood from the eyes
  7. +8
    30 December 2022 06: 18
    Now even those who participated in the collapse of the USSR speak well of socialism. How do I remember the USSR? First of all, high trust among people. Which was not in any country in the world. We are now accustomed to the fact that there is police protection in the theater, school, hospital and a bunch of institutions. This was not the case in the USSR. You can walk around the city for days without documents, and if you do not violate the order, no one will ask you for documents.
    1. 0
      30 December 2022 06: 49
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      You can walk around the city for days without documents, and if you do not violate the order, no one will ask you for documents.

      Remind me in what years did the first hijacking of an airplane, an explosion in the subway and the capture of hostage-children at school happen in the USSR? Let me remind you not to bother: October 15, 1970, the first hijacking. 1977 - explosions (not one in the subway), 1981 - the first hostage-taking. There was no Gorbachev in power yet ... It was the triumph of developed socialism. And by the way, I broke my knuckles on the face of some drunkard who started pestering me right at my house ... in 1975.
      1. +4
        30 December 2022 09: 08
        Ah! Mr. Shpakovsky? A historian of the CPSU who changed his shoes in a jump ... Well, you have to write some kind of disgusting thing ..
        1. 0
          31 December 2022 05: 50
          Yes, and is it a story? The first "hijackings" were even before the war ... One of their consequences was the 37th year. It was necessary to put things in order ... Another thing is that there were people who tried to use the situation. However, as always ... for now ...
      2. +7
        30 December 2022 09: 49
        Vyacheslav Olegovich, and these were signs of the decay of socialism, the one that the Bolsheviks built. The trend has emerged. And it was from the very beginning of the USSR. But actively suppressed. Under Brezhnev, the reins were released. Even earlier - under Khrushchev. And the destruction of socialism quietly began to gain momentum. Those who did this naively believed that they were able to build capitalism no worse, if not better than Western capitalism. Naive! Capitalism, like socialism, is the creativity of the broad masses of the people, demanding favorable conditions throughout the centuries. The Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU, having legally excluded these very broad masses of the people, received the current economic system, which bears little resemblance to capitalism.
      3. +5
        30 December 2022 20: 23
        Quote: kalibr
        Remind me in what years did the first hijacking of an airplane, an explosion in the subway and the capture of hostage-children at school happen in the USSR?

        Vyacheslav Olegovich! What would you like to say with your resume?
        An-24 hijacking can be compared to a train ride from Russia to America...
        Terrorist attacks, for the accomplishment of which no one even took responsibility ... Separatists who have lost their minds?
        Two deserters decided to cover their skins with tenth graders? Is this a typical occurrence?
        * * *
        Do you want one truth, it should be familiar to you as a researcher of historical events and incidents? Nothing scares a criminal more than complete oblivion. Can you imagine? He committed a crime, they announced the name of the person involved and that's it ... Further on in the protocol - he was burned in the crematorium oven, the remains were scattered to the wind.
        And you need to start with cleaning the cemeteries, from where it's time to remove the memorials to thieves.
        * * *
        Sometimes people see the big in the small and vice versa. You noticed the facts, ignoring the reasons for their occurrence. Was it not the substitution of truth with lies that caused the loss of the reputation of the Soviet leadership? Didn't the separation of the party nomenklatura from ordinary communists and ignoring the principles of democratic centralism ruined the organization, in the ranks of which there was also the current leadership in the person of sworn liberals who do not want to wait?
        Randomness will remain an accident, an out of the ordinary episode, but not a special case of regularity.
        Remember what question was most often asked in the kitchens by Soviet people?
        "Why do the victors live worse than the vanquished?"
        A perversion of socialist principles - that's what it was. The time when bureaucrats began to rummage through the state treasury, as if in their own pocket. Before that, they were brought by full state support ...

        hi
    2. -2
      31 December 2022 00: 08
      First of all, high trust among people.


      Perhaps there was trust even before the age of 50, but later there was no longer trust, this can also be seen by cultural display, in Gaidai's comedies, films by Deneliy (Mimino), Ryazanov's films (Garage, Station for two), Raikin's work, everything in political studies ( most) did not believe in what was being said, there was a terrible lack of fatigue in the army, in places monstrous with bullying, and all this was hushed up, covered up, in Tatarstan in the 70s a criminal group Tyap-Lyap appeared. In 1980, in the subway, drunken policemen beat a KGB officer to death, having previously robbed him (murder on Zhdanovskaya). I think you are familiar with such a word as a pusher, this was also a mass phenomenon.
  8. -25
    30 December 2022 06: 21
    in the case, the comrades of the scoops built a fenced state-concentration camp, which, as a result, lagged behind that of the whole world. existed, by historical standards, for only a brief moment before collapsing from internal decay. but nevertheless managed to kill the Russians in itself, as a people, during this time. and to grow a caste of godless cynic materialists at the top of society, the consequences of which we are still experiencing.
    1. -10
      30 December 2022 06: 51
      Quote: squid
      comrades scoops built a fenced-in state-concentration camp,

      Where, of course, there were joys. And why would we take first place on the planet in terms of drinking in terms of pure alcohol and the number of abortions?! Such a great project...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        30 December 2022 08: 20
        For the information of a propagandist from the USSR.
        What do you know about contraceptive methods in the USSR, except for product number 2?
        Contraceptive methods for women now.
        Condoms. ...
        Vaginal diaphragms, cervical caps, sponges - female barrier contraceptives. ...
        Spermicides. ...
        Intrauterine devices (IUDs). ...
        vaginal rings. ...
        Birth control pills. ...
        Contraceptive injections. ...
        Hormonal implants.

        Moreover, the birth rate in the USSR was higher than now
        1. -1
          31 December 2022 00: 14
          In fairness, it is necessary to compare modern Russia with the RSFSR, the republics also gave a high birth rate.
      4. +6
        30 December 2022 08: 22
        About alcohol consumption

        When did you start drinking more?
        1. +3
          30 December 2022 08: 28
          For comparison now

          You can add the beginning of the century


          Shtof - 1,3 l
      5. +12
        30 December 2022 09: 16
        And why would we take first place on the planet in terms of alcohol consumed in terms of pure alcohol

        You are sliding lower and lower, Vyacheslav. What you just wrote is a lie. They weren't even in the top five.
      6. +5
        30 December 2022 10: 26
        Such a great project...


        Vyacheslav Olegovich, once again!
        In order for a trend to be sustainable, it must have the broadest support among the masses. But we propagate the people. This means that there must be a certain percentage of absolutely convinced carriers of the trend that promotes it. During the Great Patriotic War, absolutely convinced bearers of the idea of ​​socialism with the transition to communism were killed at the front. Eight million warriors! And not only at the front, but in the occupied territories. Remember the total number of losses. As a result of a critical decrease in the number of competitors, the carriers of the opposite trend gained an advantage - supporters of the idea of ​​convergence, which means capitalism. Socialism was not allowed enough historical time to become the absolute mentality of the people. Simply put, a folk custom, such as capitalism has become in the countries of the West. Such a custom, the violation of which is condemned by the whole society - from top to bottom. That is why the Soviet people became the prey of the idea of ​​capitalism. And for this, everything was done by the treacherous part of the ruling elite.
        The Western capitalist world, having started a world war against us, has deprived us of historical time, which strengthens the trend of socialism.
        And a very painful question by now.
      7. +2
        30 December 2022 20: 38
        Quote: kalibr
        And why would we take first place on the planet in terms of drinking in terms of pure alcohol and the number of abortions?!

        The first place in the world in terms of the amount of alcohol consumed was drawn to us by the West, where consumption was at the level and even higher. And the image of a “drunkard” in the USSR was as follows:

        As for abortions, your truth ... The lack of sexual enlightenment and contraceptives, which could only be bought at a pharmacy and put on the heads of "bad" people, did their job. And also the state policy regarding the death penalty for an unborn child.
      8. +1
        31 December 2022 17: 26
        With all due respect .... Could you name the year? When the USSR, suddenly, became the leader in per capita consumption of ethanol .....
        And yes, but what about abortions now?
        Well, if we began to compare the "USSR concentration camp" and the democratic Belovodie ..... For some objectivity, so to speak ....
    2. +4
      30 December 2022 08: 38
      Serge. You are experiencing the consequences of a great plunder. As for the atheists, they did not burn anyone alive, as the church did in the fight against the Old Believers. Don't believe? And you read "12 articles of Princess Sophia." Here is the most rabid cruelty against children, women, the elderly.
    3. +6
      30 December 2022 10: 01
      on the case - comrades scoops

      It seems they were going to write "on the case", but they wrote some kind of garbage.
      PS There is a wonderful person. Which at one moment is bitten by a typhoid louse. The person is dying. Does this mean that the human species is not viable, or that humans are not wonderful?
  9. +11
    30 December 2022 06: 23
    Reasons for success? - The most powerful social elevator that lifted people from the earth to power. They knew exactly what was on it and what they wanted to change for the better. Unlike hereditary counts and deputies from the cradle, as in the Republic of Ingushetia today. As a result, people saw the fruits of the change of counts and the improvement of their lives, education for everyone, the same tractor instead of a plow harnessed to women, etc. Here is the highest support of the population of power and readiness to die for it.
    1. -6
      30 December 2022 06: 44
      Here is the highest support by the population of power and the willingness to die for it
      what year are you talking about? About 91?
      1. +8
        30 December 2022 07: 09
        This is about civil and World War II. The 91st is a different country, and in fact there were other moods among people.
    2. -7
      30 December 2022 06: 52
      Quote: evgen1221
      As a result, people saw the fruits of changing counts and improving their lives.

      And they began to thump en masse! Remind me how much booze we consumed in 1975, the most prosperous year in the USSR?
      1. +12
        30 December 2022 07: 11
        It was already a different country. And how much did the British booze at the same time?
      2. +10
        30 December 2022 08: 18
        And they began to thump en masse!
        Vyacheslav, you, by any chance, were not members of the "Sobriety Society" headed by the crazy academician Uglov? Nonsense about "mass booze" from there.
  10. +7
    30 December 2022 06: 38
    "And I recognize the author by his gait" ... by the title ..
    1. +8
      30 December 2022 07: 13
      Samsonov is such Samsonov.))) He does not change at all
      1. +2
        31 December 2022 05: 38
        Stability is a sign of mastery... or...
  11. +3
    30 December 2022 08: 35
    Well, again, Samsonov guessed right from the first paragraph. I noticed that you can immediately guess Samsonov, Staver and Skomorokhov. CCC. Somewhere among them there must be some Ryabov or Ryabchinsky ...
    1. +5
      30 December 2022 10: 28
      Samsonov can be recognized by the title of the article without even opening ...
  12. +1
    30 December 2022 09: 05
    in my opinion, if communism is a utopia, then socialism is a reality and something that can be achieved, because we, living in the USSR, had the dominant components of real socialism. Hence the conclusion that it is necessary and possible to return to socialism, but without admittance to the project of the return of the communist party. But the Bolsheviks must be remembered for sure! It was they who in 1917 raised the abandoned power with the liberals, did not allow the collapse of Russia, recreated the Empire in the form of the USSR, preserved this Red Empire of Russia of the USSR by defeating fascism and handed it over to the communists after the death of Great Stalin. But the communists, those for as many years as the Bolsheviks recreated the Empire and preserved it by defeating fascism, for the same number of years the communists loudly clapping at party meetings but lazily sniffing in the flowering garden created by the Stalinist Bolsheviks called the USSR, the empire was gradually destroyed and the country was squandered without a single shot of the enemy from outside. There is only one conclusion, returning to socialism it is necessary to drive the communists as far as possible from this project of return. By the way, the majority in today's ruling party under the leadership of Medvedev are also former communists.
    And further . We need to return precisely to Soviet socialism. But how the pillar nobles who portrayed all sorts of Pugachevs, Narusovs, Abramovichs, Rashkins, etc. will survive now, few people should care.
    As for the Romanov dynasty, this project was completed by one specific person from this dynasty. This is the spineless woman's henpecked Nicholas II. There were really Great ones in the Romanov dynasty and they expanded the Empire as the embodiment of the Russian, and not the Western project. That is why the monument to them is being demolished in the project of today's West, in today's Ukraine.
    1. -1
      31 December 2022 05: 37
      What did you get in the spirit of Samsonov ..
  13. +6
    30 December 2022 09: 43
    That is why the internationalist revolutionaries hated everything Russian so much. They divided the Russian super-ethnos into three parts - actually Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. Everything Russian was banned. They destroyed Russian history, culture and faith.

    Seriously? belay
    Where did the UNR and BPR come from in 1918, after the collapse of the Republic of Ingushetia by the Februaryists? Again, Lenin and his comrades are to blame? lol
    Socialism built on the supremacy of minority nationalism?
    Does the author even understand the definition of "equality and brotherhood", not only in the classes that were abolished?
    Again an attempt to push through imperial nationalism as the main ideology of the current Russian Federation?
    For a moment, 190 nationalities currently live in the Russian Federation.
    We will appoint a "superethnos", and if all the nationalities of the Russian Federation want to participate in the selection of the "chief"? What's left, don't you think?
  14. +14
    30 December 2022 09: 43
    In general, we raise our glasses in memory of the centenary of the USSR. For all his shortcomings, he achieved a lot.
    As many leftists and economists say, we live on its reserves .....
  15. +2
    30 December 2022 09: 45
    Quote: Vladimir80
    "Acquire the spirit of peace and thousands around you will be saved."


    Are we breeding priesthood?
    "Well, granny, how did you save the painted iconostasis?"
    The spirit is peaceful, like a lamb, especially loved by fierce wolves.
    1. 0
      30 December 2022 10: 33
      Are we breeding priesthood?

      yeah, I’m divorcing and apparently I’m interfering with celebrating the new year
  16. +10
    30 December 2022 09: 47
    Quote: kalibr
    Quote: evgen1221
    As a result, people saw the fruits of changing counts and improving their lives.

    And they began to thump en masse! Remind me how much booze we consumed in 1975, the most prosperous year in the USSR?


    Under democracy, presumably, they stopped drinking.
    What is "Royal" in the bushes?
    And next to it are used syringes ...
  17. +7
    30 December 2022 09: 56
    Quote: ee2100
    About alcohol consumption


    The data is complete bullshit. Moonshine is allowed in the Russian Federation. How is it taken into account and considered?
    They began to drink less "state-owned" because expensive ... moonshine is much cheaper.

    And alcohol is just one of the drugs, and not the strongest. Would you like to give data on the consumption of at least heroin? What will be the dynamics over the years? Has there been a decline?
    Not to mention marijuana or any exotic (smoking mixtures, all kinds of chemicals).
    However, for some, "virtual reality" with social networks is an analogue of drugs, without which life is no longer sweet.
    1. -1
      2 January 2023 21: 28
      They began to drink less "state-owned", because expensive ... moonshine is much cheaper

      Only here a decent moonshine still costs a lot of money. I recently ordered a beer column in parts, with all the small things I left to 8 thousand. This is despite the fact that the tank and the refrigerator are already there, in total it is 16 thousand. But this is the most budgetary diameter of 1,5 inches. In general, not an option for those who like to drink away their salary.

      Yes, they used to drive on very simple devices. But then the product of the first distillation was already called moonshine and drunk, but now it is, raw alcohol for further processing. No one really drinks this anymore (except in the outback), the quality of drinks has grown.

      And in general, one might think that they were not banned in the USSR. They drove, how.
      1. +1
        3 January 2023 07: 15
        Now there are no problems to buy a paleonka. At any time and in any quantity. And completely without taking into account excise stamps.
  18. +6
    30 December 2022 10: 02
    Quote: kalibr
    Remind me in what years did the first hijacking of an airplane, an explosion in the subway and the capture of hostage-children at school happen in the USSR? Let me remind you not to bother: October 15, 1970, the first hijacking. 1977 - explosions (not one in the subway), 1981 - the first hostage-taking.


    Moreover, all this was arranged not at all by convinced "commies", but by those who were ideologically close to you: they hated everything Soviet (like the Armenian nationalists who staged explosions in the metropolitan metro), or were eager to get into the "countries of the free world". So to speak, the first sprouts of democracy and liberalism that made their way from under the blocks of "totalitarianism".
  19. -1
    30 December 2022 10: 38
    And the rate is on a human creator, a creator, and not a slave-consumer, as in the West.


    War is peace, freedom...
  20. +10
    30 December 2022 11: 58
    Soviet civilization: reasons for success.

    Another beat the main economic law in the Soviet era - the satisfaction of the needs of society.
    Today in Russia, and all other countries except socialist, the basic law is the maximum profit for the oligarchs.
  21. +2
    30 December 2022 12: 02
    ps the article is called "Soviet civilization. Reasons for success", I would like to wait for the second part of the article - "Reasons for defeat"
    1. +11
      30 December 2022 13: 41
      I wonder how many years the transition from the slave system to feudalism, from feudalism to capitalism lasted?
      And then they just tried to build socialism, as all the capitalists of the world rushed to interfere, one Great Patriotic War is worth something.
      But the capitalists who staged a coup d'etat in the 90s pretend that the Union itself collapsed.
      1. +5
        30 December 2022 16: 18
        Quote: Gardamir
        And then they just tried to build socialism, when all the capitalists of the world rushed to interfere

        And what's so surprising, this project was supposed to end with the complete destruction of all capitalists as a class. On the example of one country, they showed how this is done. Others shuddered and began to work...
  22. +5
    30 December 2022 16: 26
    The USSR and socialism is such a complex topic that needs to be covered in a very balanced and reasoned way, moreover, the author should in no case be biased.
    And Samson's delirium is exclusively for srach and clickbait. Such opuses only hurt.
    1. Fat
      +4
      30 December 2022 17: 54
      hi Agree. The combination of the "Russian superethnos" with the "path of socialism" can only be called National Bolshevism, but it is impossible. Edik Limonov was convicted for such an experiment.
      Samsonov is different ...
  23. +2
    30 December 2022 17: 04
    The author scribbled a rare nonsense ...
  24. +2
    30 December 2022 17: 08
    Long live fantasy!!! USSR-2 is impossible if not made by force.
  25. +2
    30 December 2022 19: 34
    Our powers that be, starting with GDP, DAM, deputies, senators, ministers, etc., are allergic to everything Soviet. Until they are changed, there can be no talk of any USSR-2. At least until 2036. For insulting the symbol, St. George's ribbon, the term threatens. But take an object of great heritage, annually clogged with plywood. The mausoleum, a symbol of the Victory over fascism, at the foot of which the banners of the defeated enemy were thrown, is stuffed with plywood on Victory Day, which is especially cynical. Isn't that an insult to the symbol?
  26. +2
    30 December 2022 19: 52
    Thank God, the dream is a free pleasure ... Only the "collective West" blames for the revolution and the Civil War is very convenient, but this is far from the truth. The reforms were delayed, not brought to mind ... If Alexander 1 did what was useful Alexander 2, the fate of Russia could have been different ...
  27. +1
    30 December 2022 19: 53
    An article about the new Russian empire, under the slogan of the Russian world, the capital of New Vasyuki will be in the empire ... I was born and raised in a country where all nations were brothers and equals, where there was social justice, where there were no patriots with villas in Italy, where mediocrity with a splinter in one place they didn’t lead our space, where labor was valued more than the blood of all kinds of insta-females .. An article about creating a new empire, well, yes, yes, all this is only for traders
  28. -2
    30 December 2022 22: 31
    The West in the EU project does not set itself the task of expanding the independence of the EU members, but is consistently eliminating it (independence and independence). Why Russia should step on the same rake is not clear. The USSR, Stalin, Lenin have already clearly shown and proved in practice where the attempts to create a union state lead. Why divide the indivisible? To then accuse the West of interference.
  29. -7
    30 December 2022 23: 48
    The title of the article is absurd, as is its content. How can you talk about the success of a system that lasted only one human life? Where were you, lovers and admirers of the USSR, in 1991? Why didn't you fight for the country that raised you and brought you to the people? Did you go to the referendum and that's it? It is now, after 30 years, you, having taken a sip of dashing, are so lively in the comments, and then, I suppose, for clothes from behind a hillock, you were ready for anything. Hypocrites!
    1. -1
      31 December 2022 11: 38
      Are you hinting at the State Emergency Committee, sick?

      Sorry, I'm not smart enough to write a normal comment
  30. +1
    31 December 2022 05: 29
    The New Year is just approaching, the vinaigrette has already been served ... This is me talking about this ... eeee ... opus ... And the ingredients are somehow smelly ..
  31. 0
    31 December 2022 10: 45
    Gentlemen are good! "Take everything and share!". People's brains were turned out great and washed out by the masterpiece creation of director Bortko, who considers himself a communist, the film "Heart of a Dog".
    As a film - it was made with talent and deservedly raked in a bunch of awards.

    Bulgakov's eponymous literary libel had no such success. In the USSR years, free-thinking students underground read this work of the Soviet literary Woland, secretly reproduced on a rotaprint, it seems that it was called "Era" (who does not know - at that distant time something like a photocopier). This creation did not inspire us at all and even seemed, oh horror!, boring, coupled with the "Fatal Eggs" ... True, we also did not come across the forbidden "Master" then.

    From the point of view of all this gang-brotherhood - socialism - it's all to take and share! A quote from a declassed non-party balalaika player from a pub, who has nothing to do with the proletariat and the workers. However, we have stormy liberal applause that has not stopped until now ...
    And what about the table chatter of two 20s "intellectuals" who have been snickering in hungry Moscow, who operate exclusively rich harlots and harlots for chervonets and scandal at all, not in an intellectual way, when they want to take away 1 (!) room out of 7 available. Kar-r-aul!

    And what's wrong with really "taking and dividing" everything stolen, at least, for starters, by the oligarchs. National wealth has long been "taken and divided" among themselves by the handsome men from the Forbes lists. And it’s weak to nationalize everything, transfer it to state-owned companies and send ALL income to the treasury, for pensions, state employees, etc. etc. ? This has already been and not bad, I must say, it was.
    And on yachts at the price of an aircraft carrier, organize a festivities with fireworks on this occasion, having previously evicted beauties with low social responsibility from there ... Or maybe they themselves even want to stay. Who knows...

  32. +1
    31 December 2022 15: 02
    it was the completion of the Romanov project
    - what kind of project? Who is the architect? The main performers and divisions, the purpose of the project? Is the author screwed up? Maybe give links to forks? IT historian of figs.
  33. -4
    31 December 2022 16: 28
    If we discard emotions, moral assessments and approach strictly scientifically, then we must say:
    The experiment on building communism showed that the time of the existence of a socialist society after the state stopped repression (passive period) is approximately equal to the time
    previous repressions (active period). This second period leads either to the fusion of capital with the communist elite (China, Vietnam), or to a sharp collapse of the state. system (USSR, CMEA countries). The passive period can continue indefinitely in a mild climate and eternal summer on a small island (Cuba).
  34. 0
    2 January 2023 13: 38
    I am for the return of socialism, but Putin will not allow this, even with the threat of the death of Russia, he will protect the interests of a narrow group of his friends who own the country's wealth. But a smart man could become the second Lenin or Stalin
  35. -2
    3 January 2023 13: 06
    Your basic problem, author, is that you maniacally want to repeat something that didn’t work before. Why should it work for you? People like you will ruin one platoon after another, for the sake of an idea. What we are seeing. Stop bullshitting and learn history. All Russian history is the history of the disenfranchised existence of ordinary people. That's when we begin to appreciate ourselves, then everything will start to turn out. Do not sacrifice yourself to the country, but simply build it.
    1. +1
      4 January 2023 11: 07
      In the meantime, we "do not value ourselves" then what? To use the liberal-capitalist ideology?
  36. -2
    3 January 2023 20: 48
    The logic is strange. If the tsar was a Westernizer, why would the West overthrow him?
    1. 0
      4 January 2023 11: 08
      It is truth too. But is it apparently "different"?
  37. -1
    4 January 2023 16: 45
    Why did the USSR collapse? Somehow they said little about it. Speaking scientifically, this is the reason: labor productivity in the USSR lagged more and more behind labor productivity in developed countries. This reason is little understood by the vast majority of people. However, in reality, this meant that capitalism was producing more and more at less cost, while paying higher wages to its workers. And the USSR was lagging behind more and more. The ruling CPSU, instead of understanding and taking effective economic measures, increasingly began to lie to the people about the successes in building socialism and did nothing serious to rebuild the economy. At the grassroots level, sheer lies in public life, the dominance of the aging partocracy, which did not own the economic theory of management, led to the fact that the people began to work according to the "anyhow" type, as long as they did not touch. Products often became of poor quality and that was not enough. The economy of the USSR was immune to scientific and technological progress. The trust of the people in the government disappeared, which led to the collapse.
    1. -1
      11 February 2023 13: 06
      Quote: Alexey Lantukh
      Why did the USSR collapse? ...... The ruling CPSU, instead of understanding the economy of the USSR, was immune to scientific and technical ..... The people's trust in the government disappeared, which led to the collapse.
      In the USSR, the economy became the second economy in the World within 10 years after the end of the Second World War ..... And rocket technology and nuclear weapons, the world's first nuclear power plant, is this not progress?
      And now the economy is "receptive to science and technology?"

      Do you really understand what you write?
      I believe that the USSR collapsed because a type similar to yours has become dominant in Russia since the beginning of the 70s.

      This can only be explained by the fact that a gigantic wave of people from the villages poured into the cities "under the limit" and involuntarily began to participate in the political life of the country.
  38. 0
    11 February 2023 13: 08
    Renounce Westernism in culture, return to the path of socialism, ceasing to be the periphery of the capitalist world. The path is difficult, full of labors, battles and accomplishments, but there is no other way. Time to wake up! Everyone! Otherwise we will be crushed!
    The same cabbage soup, but pour in a thinner one?
    Think about it, it's a revolution! Open the creations of the great revolutionary, refresh your memory of what is said there about the driving forces, prerequisites, the revolutionary situation, etc. An accurate calculation is needed, and even then success is doubtful. And what you write is beautiful-hearted dreams, Manilovism is - that's what!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"