Union of Free Social Republics. We are from the USSR

135
Union of Free Social Republics. We are from the USSR


Not everything is so hopeless


At the end of last year, VTsIOM conducted a survey as part of the 30 Years Without the USSR project, which showed that the majority of Russians surveyed (82%) know how the abbreviation USSR stands for, 18% could not name the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Correctly answered the question 94–95% of citizens of the older generation and only 59–60% of young people.



Who is to blame for the fact that our children do not even know the name of the great country in which their parents grew up? Only themselves. However, absolutely sprinkle ashes on your head is not worth it. According to many studies, the attitude of the current young generation towards the USSR is very positive.

Moreover, a significant part of them consider the Soviet era the best in stories our state. And this, by the way, is typical not only for Russia, but also for many former Soviet republics, where it is imperative to play the anti-Soviet card - almost the norm for any advanced politician.

Of course, time retouches historical ulcers. Parents, originally from the USSR (not counting the noteworthy liberals), in conversations with children about the past, most likely did not focus on the distortions of collectivization and the tragedies of the builders of the White Sea Canal, on the lines for green sausage and torn tights, replacements for which could not be bought.

Never forget it


As a rule, young people learn from the older generation about the important and unique things that happened in our lives during the years of the USSR. The Great Victory, the construction of new cities and the construction of thousands of factories, Gagarin and the greatest scientific discoveries, the Bolshoi Theater and amazing culture.

But there was one more thing, perhaps the most important thing, that young citizens of Russia feel in the stories of their fathers and grandfathers about life in the USSR. This is an invaluable sense of confidence in the future, a sense of justice, albeit not guaranteed in everything and everywhere, and a sense of social security and need for one's country.


Young people, although not all, alas, also know about the feeling of pride that we experienced, understanding what influence our country had in the world. No matter what anyone says, it was the Soviet Union that actually forced Britain, France and other colonial powers to abolish modern slavery in their overseas territories.

It was we who protected many peoples in Asia, Africa and Latin America from American neo-colonialism. There is no doubt that, looking at the USSR, many Western states were simply forced to introduce certain guarantees of social and legal protection of workers.

The best people in the world


And the citizens of the Soviet Union firmly knew that man is a brother to man - regardless of skin color, nationality and religion. We were brought up that way from the cradle. And although some people had so-called everyday nationalism in their souls, we considered such people to be marginalized, and they could not achieve anything worthwhile in our, Soviet life.

Today we see how our former brothers are ready to kill just because you are Russian, Ossetian or Armenian. The disease of rejection of "strangers" after the collapse of the USSR turned out to be so contagious that it was caught in almost the entire post-Soviet space.

And the local elites not only did not fight this epidemic, but also encouraged its spread in every possible way. Cave nationalist instincts have become for them the perfect tool to achieve their selfish interests.

The baton of the disastrous fragmentation of the post-Soviet space along ethnic lines was picked up by our Western "partners" gleefully rubbing their hands, generously providing money to all those who advocated "complete independence from Russia."

It is thanks to the concerted efforts of local tsars and their foreign sponsors that the collapse of the USSR is so abundantly washed and washed in blood.

The last feature


And now we have reached the last line. In fact, the NWO is a struggle not only for the security of Russia, but also for interethnic peace in the former USSR.

I am sure that when we win, the Central Asian bai will immediately turn their tails, quietly encouraging the Russophobic attacks of local nationalists. Pro-Turkish Azerbaijan will calm down in its appetites. The shots in the triangle Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan-Tajikistan will be silenced.

Russia, as has happened more than once, will become not only a guarantor of calm, but also a center of attraction for most of the peoples in its environment. Of course, if we can offer something to people whose fathers and grandfathers lived with us for centuries in friendship and harmony, died shoulder to shoulder for the common Victory and jointly restored the country from ruins.

History has convincingly proved that real unity cannot be formed only along ethnic lines. Today, there is a lot of talk about the unification of the Russian world, while, of course, the stipulation is made that the community of people of different nationalities with the same cultural and historical code is meant.

The idea seems to be attractive, but it seems to me that, relying only on the past, it is hardly possible to build the future. Signing treaties a hundred years ago to join the USSR, the peoples of Central Asia, the Caucasus, Ukraine and Belarus saw in Russia not only protection, but also a completely new social perspective.

The proposed model of justice, equality and genuine internationalism was so attractive that it outweighed all nationalist and small-town interests.

If we ourselves here in Russia can build at least a prototype of such a state, then there can be no doubt that in the near future the Union of Free Social Republics will become a reality. And it doesn't matter what form it takes.
135 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    30 December 2022 03: 13
    "Union of Free Social Republics" - who is it about?)
    1. +57
      30 December 2022 07: 08
      Those who still remember and know, Happy Holidays!
      1. +38
        30 December 2022 07: 34
        31 years since there is no USSR, and these all continue to parasitize on the remnants of the Soviet mining industry.
        Again. The USSR is not only about territory, but about an embodied idea social justice.
      2. +35
        30 December 2022 07: 39
        Remember!
        Happy birthday, Soviet Union!
        1. +9
          31 December 2022 06: 52
          The Union was the most socially oriented country in the world.
          There was not, is not and is not expected such ...
          1. +8
            6 January 2023 10: 55
            Exactly! Those who found the Soviet times will agree that the advantages of the Soviet system for workers many times exceeded the disadvantages.
    2. +12
      30 December 2022 07: 35
      "Union of Free Social Republics" - who is it about?)
      This is an old idea, the beginning of the 90s, when there was still preparations for a referendum on the preservation of the USSR, on the preparation of a new union treaty, then in the press, it was heavily exaggerated, as if the people voted for the preservation of the USSR, as the renewed USSR would be called. There was also such a name - the Union of Sovereign Free Republics ..
    3. Aag
      +7
      30 December 2022 17: 22
      Quote: Sniper
      "Union of Free Social Republics" - who is it about?)

      Apparently, about what is at the beginning of the article: not everyone can now answer what the USSR is ... Perhaps - one of the answers (((.
      hi
      Happy Anniversary to all those who are grateful for their upbringing, education, happy youth, youth! To the older generation - bow, and thank you.
      hi
  2. +15
    30 December 2022 03: 15
    Life itself is pushing for the restoration of the USSR. The distribution of territories did not make any republic of the USSR prosperous. The former republics took control of our incredible partners and began to work on further fragmentation of the country. The border region's ambassador to the UN recently declared the illegality of Russia's representation in the UN. Like this place was for the USSR. Russia called itself the successor to the USSR. And if, at the request of the outskirts, Russia claims the rights to the outskirts as the successor to the USSR? And if tomorrow at the UN the sign ** Russian Federation ** is changed to ** Soviet Union **? Then the regime of the outskirts will become the regime of separatists on the territory of the USSR. And Kazakhstan? And the Balts? And the Asian republics?
    in the near future, the Union of Free Social Republics will become a reality.
  3. -3
    30 December 2022 03: 28
    History
    convincingly proved that real unity cannot be formed only along ethnic lines. Today, there is a lot of talk about the unification of the Russian world, while, of course, the stipulation is made that the community of people of different nationalities with the same cultural and historical code is meant.

    smile But what about the united Germany, but what about China.
    In addition to the ethnic sign of unification, there should be a strong army, an attractive economy, a strong and stable vertical of power and the weakness of local beys, atamans and khans.
    I do not believe in the internationalism of peoples ... an attempt to plant it in Afghanistan cost us dearly, and with the deterioration of the economy, peoples quickly begin to scatter to their villages and farms, denying any unification with the losing economy.
    The perestroika and reformers of the 90s managed to strike at the backbone of the USSR, the Russian people, depriving them of faith in communism and misinforming that a better bright future awaits them under capitalism ... and the Land of Soviets crumbled like a house of cards.
    Now we are again on the difficult path, groping for a new path of development for Russia by trial and error.
    1. +13
      30 December 2022 04: 26
      We can only talk about the unification of peoples with the establishment of a progressive system, a strong army, an economy and other means of uniting capital
      The Soviet Union was based on Marxist ideology and not on the "economy", without the first there could be no union due to the beginning of the reaction, as it turned out
      Believe in something that does not exist outside the boundaries of this, in fact, faith, everything else does not depend on your faith, the internationalism of peoples is based on a common class affiliation, where there is one class - there differentiation into peoples disappears over time
      The blow to the USSR was not dealt by the perestroikas, who themselves are a consequence of the degradation of the state-forming ideology, but by the reactionary elements and the struggle against them that did not take place back in the days of Stalin and the Collective Government
      Russia, as a separate state, like all the former republics and any other country, in one perspective or another, has no future other than a socialist one.
      1. -7
        30 December 2022 10: 10
        Russia, as a separate state, like all the former republics and any other country, in one perspective or another, has no future other than a socialist one.

        Better "state as a service."
        1. -6
          30 December 2022 12: 47
          It’s even interesting, those who blurted out “-”, at least heard about such a concept and how it works? Or just did not like the word "service"?
          1. +6
            30 December 2022 14: 27
            Quote from fakir88
            It’s even interesting, those who blurted out “-”, at least heard about such a concept and how it works? Or just did not like the word "service"?

            We not only heard, but also saw, and we see today, this is your "state as a service".)))
            1. -3
              30 December 2022 23: 13
              Where? So far, no one has implemented it, while only the theoretical base is being prepared.
              1. +3
                31 December 2022 00: 03
                Quote from fakir88
                So far, only the theoretical base is being prepared.

                at 34, you already need to learn to think
                those who prepare such theories, they have decided, it is THEY who will be in the comfort zone, but you in this society are destined for the fate of Morlock
                read Wells, it's all been described
          2. Aag
            +1
            30 December 2022 21: 53
            Quote from fakir88
            It’s even interesting, those who blurted out “-”, at least heard about such a concept and how it works? Or just did not like the word "service"?

            Interesting question(s)...
            The minus, it seems, is mostly due to the incorrect, disrespectful posing of questions ...
            I do not call for idolatry, but, believe me, a significant part of this site is worthy of respect, -...
            1. -1
              30 December 2022 23: 25
              I do not call for idolatry, but, believe me, a significant part of this site is worthy of respect, -...

              I don't even know what to say. Did the word "blurt" bother you? Tk at the expense of questions, I was not particularly mistaken, for example, worthy of all respect "aleksejkabanets" - I do not know what it is about, similarly with "Vasilenko Vladimir", well, judging by their answers.
              1. +1
                31 December 2022 00: 06
                Quote from fakir88
                similarly with "Vasilenko Vladimir", well, judging by their answers.

                you don’t know, sorry, ANY society implies the possibility of self-sacrifice, in the name of the continuation of the life of this society, otherwise it is doomed to extinction, but in this concept you reject this by putting a soft pillow under the fifth point at the head of everything
          3. +3
            30 December 2022 22: 09
            Quote from fakir88
            at least heard about this concept and how it works

            I beg your pardon, but besides the "concept" itself, is there something else, for example, a working model ?!
            the state is an organism that evolves, adapts to geographic and climatic features, develops, dies, ...
            and service is idiocy and a series of state for a person, it's about like an organism for a hand
            1. -4
              30 December 2022 23: 16
              and service is idiocy and a series of state for a person, it's about like an organism for a hand

              Well, in general, this implies only the provision of services from the state without impurities such as "patriotism". Is it more comfortable to live? - you pay taxes and live, no - you change the country. Well, to simplify as much as possible.
              1. +4
                30 December 2022 23: 45
                Quote from fakir88
                Well, to simplify as much as possible.

                this is a dead end and degeneration, and if you don’t understand this, then I feel sorry for you, you live to eat and don’t eat to live
                imagine for a second that in 41 such a concept would have been dominant in the USSR, to describe the end of the history of our country?
                the one who wrote this concept is either an idiot if he wrote for his country, or a genius if he wrote for opponents
                what to do with the army, with the police, yes, with a lot of things, and if you completely hyperbolize this heresy, then the refusal to care for children, for elderly parents fits very well into it, well, NOT COMFORTABLE, and even better to kill both of them or do not start at all, this concept is contrary to Love, Honor, Dignity, Friendship, since these things are INCOMPATIBLE with comfort
                yes, in FIG, in the middle of the night I will trample through the whole city on the call of a friend when he needs help?!!!!
                did your friends come to your aid?
                but they came to me at one in the morning on a call, and they called only one and a whole crowd came, they probably had their own COMFORTABLE plans, but they didn’t give a damn about them, because there is FRIENDSHIP
                But what about those who sent a burning plane to an enemy column?!!!!
                did he think at that moment about COMFORT?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                or maybe those who suffocated in the catacombs of Kerch thought about comfort?
                I am truly sorry for you
        2. +1
          30 December 2022 22: 06
          Quote from fakir88
          Better "state as a service."

          the state cannot be a service, sorry
          1. -4
            30 December 2022 23: 16
            Why? Because it's cheaper for ruling elites to compete with philosophy than with comfort?
            1. +2
              30 December 2022 23: 57
              everything is very simple, because there are concepts that cannot be entered into the comfort system, even if we discard the war, the defense of the Motherland, etc.

              you get sick and an ambulance doctor rushes to you, it doesn’t matter if it’s night, early morning, it’s warm outside, it’s cold, he comes to you leaving his comfort zone
              you have a fire and firefighters are rushing to you, their work certainly cannot be called comfortable
              you fell into a pond and rescuers are coming to you
              etc. etc.
              who will work in all these UNCOMFORTABLE places, or do you immediately divide the people into two categories of those who live in the comfort zone and those who serve them?!!!
    2. +16
      30 December 2022 05: 09
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      The country of the Soviets crumbled like a house of cards.

      Quote: Lech from Android.
      The country of the Soviets crumbled like a house of cards.

      Maybe enough of these cowardly nonsense of the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, who divided the USSR among themselves into their anti-Soviet-Russophobic States under spells about "freedom and independence".?
      1. +5
        30 December 2022 11: 16
        Quote: tatra
        Maybe enough of these cowardly nonsense of the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, who divided the USSR among themselves into their anti-Soviet-Russophobic States under spells about "freedom and independence".?

        Irina! Was upset by the situation:

        Definitely happy to be back!!!
      2. +2
        30 December 2022 13: 46
        Quote: tatra
        Maybe enough of these cowardly nonsense of the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, who divided the USSR among themselves into their anti-Soviet-Russophobic States under spells about "freedom and independence".?

        Hello Irina! Sincerely glad to see you again! good love
      3. 0
        31 December 2022 13: 33
        cowardly nonsense of the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people

        Enemies of the USSR - that is, the Bolsheviks? - after all, it was the Bolsheviks who destroyed the Union
    3. 0
      30 December 2022 10: 44
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      But what about the united Germany, but what about China.

      Germany consists of 16 states that have partial sovereignty and are united in a federation. Officially, there are 56 nationalities in China.

      The difference between us and them is that we preserve the identity of the peoples, while the West and China, the peoples that make up them, comb it with the same brush.

      It took the Trotskyists 40 years to destroy the Stalinist USSR.
      1. +1
        30 December 2022 16: 22
        Quote: Boris55
        The difference between us and them is that we preserve the identity of the peoples, while the West and China, the peoples that make up them, comb it with the same brush.


        That's just how much these peoples need identity in modern realities? Here, take the same Germany, what unites people is not traditions, but a strong economy and a high standard of living ... The European Union - many peoples have renounced their sovereignty for the sake of better conditions for their future ... because. a common huge market, cooperation in technology and lower costs in the production of goods / services.

        China - the Han people dominate here - (1 billion 207 million people), and against its background, the remaining 55 nationalities in % of the population are somehow lost :) + strong economy, developed state, ideology, traditions, history - unite everyone.

        But what might be of interest to Russia - the former peoples of the USSR? Our economy is not very good, there is no ideology, now they can provide their own originality. gained independence .... what we can interest the neighbors, I can’t even imagine.

        Of course, if we suddenly become a rich/strong state, then everyone will be drawn to us, and the EAEU can turn into EU 2.0 or USSR 2.0, but so far this is very far away.
        1. +5
          30 December 2022 17: 44
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          European Union - many nations have given up their sovereignty

          let's just not make anyone laugh, the peoples in general are here from no side and did not refuse anything, by the way, as soon as it starts to smell like fried, the borders are closed right there
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          Of course, if we suddenly become a rich / strong state

          and that in 22 Soviet Russia was a rich and strong state ?!
          if we take, for example, Kyrgyzstan, their migrants transfer from the Russian Federation to their homeland an amount equal to the annual budget of this country, but at the same time I don’t see how this state is drawn into the arms of Russia
    4. +6
      30 December 2022 14: 29
      What about Germany? Ossie and Vessie finally love each other?
      What is an "attractive economy"? This is not a blonde with a good figure to be attractive. The purpose of the economy is somewhat different.
      In Afghanistan, I suppose, there are a lot of those who longingly recall the "Shuravi". But about the Yankees - hardly.

      The Russian people ... like they deceived him, like the last sucker, like Pinocchio. We are talking about a specific generation in which there were too many philistines who coveted "chewing gum jeans." Those who shouted "Give Yeltsin!" they never believed in communist ideas, in the majority. That's why they couldn't believe it. The largest percentage of such people turned out to be in our capitals, which is hardly accidental.

      New way, you say? Well, blessed are those who believe. Personally, I don't see anything new yet...
    5. 0
      30 December 2022 17: 39
      what about the united Germany, but what about China.
      just for reference, neither Germany, nor even China, has ever been mononational.
    6. +1
      30 December 2022 17: 40
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      But what about the united Germany, but what about China

      for the sake of truth, neither there nor there is unity
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      with the deterioration of the economy, peoples quickly begin to scatter to their auls

      fundamentally not true, ANY empire has both centripetal and centrifugal forces within itself, the main centripetal force is the Idea around which the Empire is being formed, if there is an Idea, then neither hunger nor cold will destroy the Empire, but as soon as the Idea disappears (destroys, levels out, replaced by another) The empire collapses. in 1917 (in February) they destroyed the Idea around which the Republic of Ingushetia was formed - the Autocracy followed, and the Empire collapsed, in the second half of the 90s they first leveled and then destroyed the Idea around which the USSR was formed - the ideas of communism and the leading role of the CPSU, the Soviet Empire collapsed next.
      not because of hunger or shortages, but because of the collapse of the Idea itself as the basis of the empire
    7. +1
      30 December 2022 20: 30
      What do you know about Afghanistan? You probably don’t know that all the Soviet monuments are intact there, that a year and a half ago, the Taliban was an enemy for a minute in those days, guarding the Russian embassy. This is unlike the enlightened geyropy that our grandfathers saved ... It would be better if they were silent.
      1. +1
        30 December 2022 22: 12
        Quote: Kapany3
        This is in contrast to the enlightened geyropa that our grandfathers saved ...

        the problem is that WE believed that we were saving, but the MAN-EATER did not agree with this, it was not necessary to save him, but to destroy
  4. +21
    30 December 2022 03: 36
    If we ourselves here in Russia can build at least a prototype of such a state, then there can be no doubt that in the near future the Union of Free Social Republics will become a reality.

    In order for the idea to have a chance to be realized, it is first necessary to return to the people what was stolen from them under Yeltsin. Everything needs to be nationalized - from mines and wells to factories and plants.
    All these oligarchs chic and fatten by exploiting what was created by the efforts of previous generations, our grandfathers and great-grandfathers. In fact, all this is ours, which means that it should belong to us, and not to the Abramovichs and Michelsons.
    Without nationalization and reindustrialization, the dream will remain a dream.
    1. +15
      30 December 2022 06: 29
      I agree about nationalization, but the oligarchy, which has grown together with the power structures, is, of course, against it. Yes, and the president does not say that "" for "" - '' So we will go far. Let no one forget that this is a double-edged weapon. "" Well, what is there to talk about then - as long as the natural storerooms are in the hands of a handful of "" chosen ones ", nothing will change - as they robbed the country, they will continue.
      1. +5
        30 December 2022 20: 37
        According to your logic, "pull every nail from the factory, you are the owner here, not a guest" need to be returned? What for? It's not better to forget that the owners are EVERYTHING, but is it right for Nast to work with the new capitalists? Each enterprise should have a kindergarten, all sorts of goodies for workers, etc. ? Isn't it better?
    2. +4
      30 December 2022 11: 11
      Quote: Comrade
      Without nationalization and reindustrialization, the dream will remain a dream.

      And they will remain a dream anyway - because Albert Kahn and the Great Depression in the USA are not observed.
      And without it, no one will sell us factories. Even for gold ...
      An example of an attempt to buy an Opel - when they denied us at a loss - is exemplary
      1. +7
        30 December 2022 14: 27
        no one will sell us factories
        You can build them yourself from scratch.
    3. +5
      30 December 2022 17: 46
      Quote: Comrade
      In order for the idea to have a chance to be realized, it is first necessary to return to the people ...

      first of all, the Idea itself is needed around which the Elite will form, the one that can lead the People
  5. +12
    30 December 2022 05: 15
    The people on the territory of the USSR have always been divided and divided into those who are FOR the USSR, Soviet power, socialism, and those who stupidly, irrationally, AGAINST everything Soviet, but FOR them nothing and no one was good, useful for their country and people, neither under the USSR, or after the capture of the USSR by them.
    1. +10
      30 December 2022 09: 06
      It was not in vain that Comrade Stalin postulated that as we advance towards socialism, the class struggle will only increase. What we have seen over the past 30 years is just another phase of the Civil War, not a damn thing that ended in the 20s .. Yes - we, the people, lost this phase. But - still only ahead, there are still chances to recoup. And either we will return Soviet power, or the bourgeoisie will definitely ruin us completely. The past years since the collapse of the Union have clearly shown this. Socialism is the only chance for survival for our people and our country. Yes, and for the whole planet .. So - the choice is ours.
      1. +1
        31 December 2022 19: 02
        Quote: paul3390
        ...as we move towards socialism, the class struggle will only increase ...
        And either we will return Soviet power, or the bourgeoisie will definitely ruin us completely.

        You are replacing the concept of "sovereignty" with talk about socialism and Soviet power, masking a specific aggressor with its capital in Washington with vague words about some incomprehensible bourgeoisie.
        In 91 we lost our sovereignty and today there is a national war for sovereignty - for freedom and independence.
    2. -7
      30 December 2022 10: 15
      , and those who are stupid, irrational

      Maybe it was worth listening to those who are "stupidly" against, and not posting labels, then the state would remain intact? Oh yes, the first testament of the "Soviet man" - I am always right and everyone else simply cannot "realize" my correctness. I didn’t just put “Soviet man” in quotation marks - maybe this is a fanatic, because of which the country collapsed, because criticism must be able to perceive and listen, even if in the format “criticizing - offer”.
      1. +2
        30 December 2022 17: 50
        Quote from fakir88
        Maybe it was worth listening to those who are "stupidly" against

        broadcast, listen!!!
        the problem is that there is nothing irrational in the ideas of socialism, but those who are against are simply against, which you successfully proved without giving a SINGLE argument
        Quote from fakir88
        "criticizing - suggest"

        offer, listen carefully!
        Quote from fakir88
        maybe this is a fanatic, because of which the country collapsed

        one question that will show if further discussion makes sense, how old are you
        1. 0
          30 December 2022 23: 18
          the problem is that there is nothing irrational in the ideas of socialism

          Not in ideas, but in implementation - tell us how to motivate employees with ideology, successfully motivate them for the long term.
          And, by the way, here, too, there is no specifics, except for the label "stupidly."
          and those who are stupid, irrational, AGAINST everything Soviet

          one question that will show if further discussion makes sense, how old are you

          35
          1. +2
            31 December 2022 07: 35
            Quote from fakir88
            tell us how to motivate employees with ideology, successfully motivate them for the long term.

            upbringing, you will be surprised but the people in the Union were really motivated
            Quote from fakir88
            35
            no questions
  6. +14
    30 December 2022 05: 51
    The author immediately pointed out the main facts of life in the USSR, they suffered from the distortions of collectivization, they built the White Sea Canal in agony, stood in lines for green sausage in torn tights, a replacement for which could not be bought. With green sausage overweight and in torn tights, they protected many peoples in Asia, Africa and Latin America from American neo-colonialism. Because, we have never lived so well as now .. laughing laughing
    1. +10
      30 December 2022 06: 18
      With green sausage overweight and in torn tights, they protected many peoples in Asia, Africa and Latin America from American neo-colonialism.

      Yes, I presented this picture. lol
      1. +16
        30 December 2022 06: 32
        And also in galoshes ... After all, according to the guarantor, nothing more was released.
        1. +12
          30 December 2022 07: 39
          I grew up in Lithuania and lived until the age of 93, there was sausage and different varieties of cheese, it was always full of milk and meat, too, but .... for the holidays I went to my grandfather in the Krasnodar Territory)))) the first time I precipitated when my grandfather said a can on you and go at 6 in the morning to take the turn for milk)))) in Siauliai milk was in bottles and what my grandfather explained to me what a can is)) so I immediately realized that Lithuanians are hardworking and in Russia there are only parasites and no one wants to work)))) of course this sarcasm was clear that everything was shoved in the national republic at the expense of Russia, but it has always been like this now Moscow has become the center for collecting yasak from the castles, so nothing has changed
        2. +7
          30 December 2022 08: 02
          Aha! Americans today buy these galoshes all over the world and dispose of them on the outskirts! And in return they will offer their moccasins on credit! How many years have there been no Union, but galoshes are working! wassat
        3. +2
          30 December 2022 10: 53
          Our city is located on the border with Kazakhstan. The railroad divides the city in half. Previously, in Soviet times, people stood at the crossing for 2-3 hours. Full wagons went there, and empty ones back. I remember how my father went to Kazakhstan for chickens. They sold 2 chickens in one hand. When the car appeared, they went to Kazakhstan for clothes and food twice a month. The last village in Kazakhstan, in front of Gornyak, in a samanukh shop full of clothes. Stopping at Gornyak is a large department store. There are only blue working dressing gowns, slippers and galoshes. And this is in a mining town.
        4. 0
          30 December 2022 16: 54
          And chickens, chickens are blue laughing "" ""
          1. 0
            30 December 2022 17: 55
            And before there were no others fellow Or I just didn't see
    2. SNA
      +7
      30 December 2022 08: 20
      I have never seen a green sausage in a store. As for tights...
    3. +2
      30 December 2022 17: 51
      Quote: parusnik
      standing in line for green sausage

      I have never seen green sausage in the USSR, now its sea
  7. +9
    30 December 2022 05: 52
    In general, everything is fine, but only the "improvement" of the USSR in the style of free and social is just stupidity squared. From whom free? And what does social mean? Like Western bourgeois sociality pulled out of Western social democracy?
    So in Russia she has no place. Not because it is bad, but because there are no resources to get such sociality, for this you need to have a favorable geopolitical / climatic / cultural position, and it’s not a fact that it will turn out and there will be enough resources. To talk in 2022 about bourgeois "sociality" in the Russian Federation means to completely break away from reality.
    And then the main question is that in order to create the USSR in a classical and normal form, or in a utopian "social" form, it is necessary to completely change the existing government. Speaking seriously, and not chatting, you need to decide - how to do it? and who will come to power?
    1. +6
      30 December 2022 08: 07
      First, you need to define the goals of the society. Either the society is for a group of people, or the society works for the interests of the society. Today society works for a group of individuals. Would a group of individuals be willing to give up their privileges voluntarily and work in the public interest?
      Speaking seriously, and not chatting, you need to decide - how to do it? and who will come to power?
      All true.
      1. -2
        30 December 2022 09: 45
        Well, now you, your comrades, have gathered and have decided on the goals of the society. So what? I remember that the Decembrists also determined the goals of society. In general, in the 19th century, wherever you look, someone is determined by the goals of society. How many of these determinants got the opportunity to influence this very society? And does society agree with these very goals that someone has determined for it?
        Right now, goals have been set for society. And society is not even against it, society is happy with everything.
      2. -1
        30 December 2022 16: 37
        Quote: North Caucasus
        First, you need to define the goals of the society. Either the society is for a group of people, or the society works for the interests of the society.

        It was in 1990 that the society decided on its goals. Society is tired of building rockets and being a great power and helping Africa build socialism. Society wanted 20 beers, jeans, and a McDonald's burger. What led to - we ourselves see.
        There is a dilemma - "man for the state, or the state for the person?" In Russia, there is always a "man for the state." That's why the Chukchi need a strategic nuclear submarine? Will deer graze better? No, dear, there is simply such a player on the World stage - Russia and she needs these cruisers, and you, dear, pay taxes.
        If "the state is for a person" - then you can become a small country without sovereignty. And what difference does it make whether the authorities are in Washington or in Tallinn? Where there is more money, there is better.
        This I mean that the society itself in Russia did not decide and does not decide the path of the country's development. Her path is predetermined by thousands of years of history. And no Gorbachevs can move it from this path.
        1. +2
          30 December 2022 17: 54
          Quote: Neo-9947
          It was in 1990 that the society decided on its goals. Society is tired of building rockets and being a great power and helping Africa build socialism. Society wanted 20 beers, jeans, and a McDonald's burger. What led to - we ourselves see.

          let's still face the truth, "society" in 91 no one asked, he was stupidly fucked
  8. +29
    30 December 2022 05: 56
    To everyone who remembers, happy birthday to the USSR! Our Motherland, USSR!
  9. +11
    30 December 2022 05: 59
    Here comes the last working day of 2022. At work, everyone congratulates each other on the upcoming, spend "sanitary days", get ready for "summing up the year" in red corners (yes, they are still red) and offices over a glass of tea. In short, the usual pre-holiday fuss.
    And so far no one has remembered the centenary of the Union. It’s a pity, especially since we remember about him, about THAT life almost daily.
    We are nostalgic, we curse the new life under the "new Russians". But the date went "past the money."
    And the supreme power will also slow down this date, as it was with the centenary of the October Revolution.
    1. +14
      30 December 2022 06: 26
      And so far no one has remembered the centenary of the Union.
      There was no direction from above. In the Kremlin, too, over a glass of tea, they try not to think about it.
      1. -2
        30 December 2022 17: 49
        However, in the USSR they tried not to remember that the Bolsheviks (or rather, the Russian SDRP (b)) initially came to power in one single country (Russia) - and after 25 years of rule of this party, there are 16 states in the place of the country, the total territory of which turned out to be smaller than the original territory of Russia.
    2. 0
      1 January 2023 06: 34
      30 even laid flowers with a group of comrades at the monument to Lenin why we don’t remember we remember but there were us in a city of 65 thousand 20 people the rest had no time
  10. +15
    30 December 2022 06: 23
    Who is to blame for the fact that our children do not even know the name of the great country in which their parents grew up? Only ourselves

    Well, I know. I was born in 1985. My homeland is also the USSR.
    According to the stories of the parents, only positive impressions about life in the USSR were formed during the life.
    1. +17
      30 December 2022 08: 17
      Yeah! One medicine today is worth something! In the damned Union, you were at the clinic at the doctor on the same day. And now you have to sign up for a month in advance! That is, if there is a doctor. You can go to pay. There is also a waiting list for a month. We also optimized that all medicine should be transferred to the regional center. Instead of damn affordable Soviet medicine, we are making it inaccessible. Why then an OMS policy? In the Union, pensions were paid from the budget, and now from the Pension Fund. It is clear that the solidarity system is vicious, but it was enshrined in the constitution. New settlements and enterprises were built in the Union. Nonche cities and villages are economically unprofitable and echelons of shift workers go to Moscow for money! But how not to remember the USSR with kind words ?!
      1. -13
        30 December 2022 09: 54
        Seriously?
        With all the advantages of Soviet medicine, the reception of the population cannot be attributed to them.
        Now I have no problems remotely making an appointment with a doctor, even if not on the same day. If it's urgent - there is an ambulance, an injury, a first aid room, a doctor on duty. Everywhere coupons, appointed time, came when appointed, left. Sometimes there are failures, not without it, but in general, the system works.
        In the damned Union in the clinic at the doctor on the same day, you could end up after serving the queue for 5-6 hours. And it might not have been. There seemed to be more doctors, but it took a month to get in line with a specialist, by 5 in the morning we went to the clinic and stood on the porch, waiting for the opening. And this is taking into account the fact that my relatives were doctors, and some things were done to our family by pull.
        And yes, the first aid system that has collapsed today is not a Soviet invention. They just modernized the already existing system of zemstvo doctors.
        1. +8
          30 December 2022 12: 01
          Well, it is necessary to write the truth. Now, right now, again, "electronically" I signed up for a doctor-tepapevtu and FOR SURE I know that at 16:45 I will not go into the office. God forbid, if in 1,5-2 hours. And you can’t get through to the specialists either. The turn to the surgeon is 3-4 hours. It’s a real problem with an ophthalmologist, a cardiologist and a urologist are also extremely accessible. MRT (ot it achievement) free to wait 3 4 months. But for a fee, yes even tomorrow.
          And this is in a city of a million people.
          So there is no need to lie.
        2. +5
          30 December 2022 13: 45
          Quote from olgherd
          Now I have no problems remotely making an appointment with a doctor, even if not on the same day.

          It's true ! Damned commies did not give the people either the Internet or mobile phones! And a lot more that the damned Red Barin did not give ..... But let's leave aside the question of when the Internet became the World Wide Web and when the mass production of mobile phones became .....

          There is another side. Why do people with the psychology of serfs of the 17th century "give" something? If they are waiting for the arrival of the "good master", then let them wait and say thank you for everything that they have been given.... Everything is right in this World. I always did not understand why they give you something at all? You will be silent in any case .... No answer!

          And even more so, there is no answer to the question - why do you have claims to the USSR, which has not been around for a long time? This is not a car that you once bought! The USSR is the laws that were beneficial to the majority of the population. And if the population exchanged them for laws that are beneficial to the oligarchs, where does the USSR have to do with it? Living in poverty under the laws of the USSR, having a 60+ place in terms of living standards in the world on the richest and vast territory of Russia in the 21st century is just a property of Russian psychology ....
          .
          1. +5
            30 December 2022 15: 05
            And if the population exchanged them for laws that are beneficial to the oligarchs, where does the USSR have to do with it?
            Someone must be guilty, who brought this to life? You yourself know who, the German spy Lenin is to blame, who planted American atomic bombs under the USSR .. It's okay, not long ago an indication came out that all the same, the Entente countries that provided assistance to the white movement should be considered interventionists, if they are now not partners, then and then it turns out they were not partners .. "Everything was mixed up, in the Oblonsky house" (c) laughing
            1. -2
              30 December 2022 23: 28
              then it turns out they were not partners

              Weird. And Lenin was so good at selling Russian material values ​​and US resources.

              V.I.Lenin. PSS, vol. 50, p. 74-75
              Dear Mr RobinsI am enclosing herewith a preliminary plan of our economic relations with America. This preliminary plan was worked out in detail by the commission on foreign trade in our Supreme Council of the National Economy.
              I hope this a preliminary plan may be useful to you in your conversation with the US Department of Foreign Affairs and US export specialists.
              accept my deepest thanks,
              sincerely yours Lenin

              Explanation by V.I. Lenin. PSS, vol. 50, p. 427
              In the plan for the development of trade and economic relations with the United States of America, developed on the initiative of V. I. Lenin, the Soviet government expressed its readiness to pay for goods purchased in the United States with agricultural and mining products, and also to provide the United States, along with other countries, concessions.

              V.I.Lenin. PSS, vol. 51, p. 153
              It is necessary to take especially urgent measures to accelerate the analysis of values If we're late, then for them in Europe and America they will not give anything.


              Explanation by V.I. Lenin. PSS, vol. 51, p. 412-413
              This refers to nationalized antiques, luxury items, works of art. In February 1919, A. M. Gorky created an Expert Commission in Petrograd to select and evaluate these things. Until October 1, 1920, the Expert Commission, working in the composition of 80 people, selected, as Gorky wrote, “120 different items, such as: artistic antique furniture, paintings of various eras, countries and schools, Russian, Sevres, Saxon porcelain, etc. etc., bronze, art glass, ceramics, ancient weapons, objects of oriental art, etc.
              According to the 15th year, the value of these things exceeds a billion. In addition, the warehouses of the commission contain carpets worth several hundred million (also according to an estimate of 1915) selected from abandoned apartments ”(V. I. Lenin and A. M. Gorky. “Letters, Memoirs, Documents”, 1961, p. .164). However, this work was carried out extremely slowly. In Gorky's letter, Lenin noted: "only 8 warehouses out of 33 have been dismantled."

              That is, the RSDLP (b) appropriated to themselves the value of a billion rubles at the rate of 1920 and sold it to the countries fighting against Russia.
              1. -1
                31 December 2022 13: 29
                From the memorandum of the head of the Bureau Soviet representative in New York OK. Martens to the US State Department on March 19, 1919:
                “In case of resumption of trade with the United States, the Russian Government is ready immediately place in the banks of Europe and America gold in the amount of two hundred million dollars ($200) to cover the cost of the first purchases” // Documents of the Foreign Policy of the USSR. T. 000. M., 000. S. 2
        3. +6
          30 December 2022 15: 00
          In Soviet times, enterprises dealt with the social problems of workers. There was a health center where paramedics were on duty around the clock, seven days a week and holidays. On any day, at any time of the day, you could come in and you would be provided with medical assistance, if necessary, hospitalized, sent to the hospital. Employees with chronic diseases were registered at the dispensary, the shop doctor came and people were invited to the health center during working hours. The doctor also participated in the distribution of sanatorium vouchers: she looked at what vouchers were available and attached certificates of those who needed treatment in the first place. There were medical units at defense enterprises: this was a departmental polyclinic + hospital. There were also dispensaries of enterprises: there people were treated on the job, i.e. the patient left (left) from the dispensary for work. These benefits were used not only by employees, but also by teachers, doctors, employees of child care facilities, and also treated children: there were "mother and child" races and just children's or veteran's races. The company also entered into agreements with clinics, anyone who wanted to be examined or get expert advice signed up at the health center and visited the medical facility for free at the appointed time. Much has been done for the health of workers and their children. The enterprise maintained recreation centers, its buildings in rest homes and boarding houses, summer camps for children, cultural institutions (DC, libraries, etc.). There was a whole residential village with an MKD, kindergartens near the enterprises, and invested in the construction of schools. When there were problems with food, subsidiary farms were created, from where meat and vegetables were supplied to canteens. Here are tired of suffering for sausage, not the most useful food product. Good food in canteens. Men usually took salad, soup, two second courses with a side dish, tea and pies. They were full!!! And they did not suffer from sausage. I went to the culinary after lunch, bought semi-finished products in order to cook dinner faster, there was time left to take a walk with the children. However, the children calmly walked in the yard while the parents were doing household chores, no one attacked them, the perverts did not hunt the children. Of course, the enterprise was destroyed. Now there is another plant on the territory, it works for export. Everything that I described was built and maintained on the profits of the enterprise. Now all the profits are in the pockets of the owners who do nothing for the workers. Why is that whole normal life measured by the amount of sausage: I didn’t need it then, but now I don’t even want to look at chemical sausage. It’s just that no one reads the composition: there is no time for young people, eyesight does not allow the elderly, and it’s better not to eat sausage, the variety on the shelves is a variety of flavorings.
      2. +11
        30 December 2022 11: 03
        But here's how not to remember the USSR
        Modern Russia, having declared itself the successor of the USSR, having acquired a significant part of its property, a place in the UN Security Council, did not even remember the 100th anniversary of the country it is the successor to.
      3. +7
        30 December 2022 12: 06
        You have not yet mentioned the daily "show" to collect money for children for operations, which have risen in price from 2-3 million to 13-20 or more in a year.
      4. +3
        30 December 2022 17: 56
        Quote: North Caucasus
        In the damned Union, you were at the clinic at the doctor on the same day.

        I’ll tell you more, if I couldn’t get there, the district police officer himself came to you on the same day
        Quote: North Caucasus
        You can go to pay. There is also a waiting list for a month.

        it’s scary not just for the money, but for the fact that it’s not a fact that it’s of high quality, my mother took pictures of the patency of the arteries, FOR A FEES, they showed that it was within the normal range, and when I went to the cardio center, it turned out that I needed to urgently operate on it, as the patency was 12%
  11. +6
    30 December 2022 06: 25
    Without a change in the social system, there will be no new USSR! At first there was an idea - all people are brothers and everyone is equal, and then only the state was created for this idea, when the idea took possession of the masses. Capitalism by default assumes the initial inequality of people, starting from birth. So the idea of ​​a new USSR is dead... alas...
  12. -5
    30 December 2022 06: 25
    History has convincingly proved that real unity cannot be formed only along ethnic lines.


    Yes, there is some truth in this. More deeds and ideas are needed: conquests or the struggle for the self-determination of the nation. Almost all of history is a struggle for nation-states.
    "Internationalism" and "social equality" are too ephemeral ideas to be accepted by the people. The CMEA and "SSR" countries returned to self-determination without any resistance. To abolish nationality is how to abolish gender. But "class solidarity" is a myth, refuted in 1941 and throughout history.
    The cosmopolitan project - the USSR, had a too ephemeral basis - "social justice", "building communism".
    1. +5
      30 December 2022 08: 23
      Well, how do nations self-determine themselves in the EU? Is self-determination encouraged there? Why the United States is trying to drive it into the Pacific Asian Union, then they muddied with the Arabs. The states of Libya and Iraq seem to be going to create? What about the natives in the US? Do they live in nation states?
      1. -2
        30 December 2022 11: 23
        Quote: North Caucasus
        Well, how do nations self-determine themselves in the EU? Is self-determination encouraged there? Why the United States is trying to drive it into the Pacific Asian Union, then they muddied with the Arabs. The states of Libya and Iraq seem to be going to create? What about the natives in the US? Do they live in nation states?

        Agree on Europe. The EU is skating on national identity. But the Hungarians, Poles, Germans, Greeks, etc. still defend national interests .... And the Indians - they simply lost the fight for the national state.
        The modern RF is a continuation of the cosmopolitan project from 1917. If the people do not have their own state, they will sooner or later "dissolve" .... Americans cherish THEIR history and THEIR culture. And everyone else is turned into a faceless "market" for corporations. The usual story: develop your own, weaken and destroy others. There was no other policy for 6000 years.
        1. +4
          30 December 2022 12: 24
          Quote: samarin1969
          The modern RF is a continuation of the cosmopolitan project from 1917. If the people do not have their own state, they will sooner or later "dissolve"

          "Superethnos" within the borders of Muscovy? Are you leading to this or are you proposing to "strangle" the national identity of other peoples as Indians living in the same territory of the country? wink
          By the way, did they ask how many nationalities were under the general name "American" and why in Soviet Russia the inhabitants of the country were called "Soviet"? wink
          Because the people do not have their own state? laughing
    2. +9
      30 December 2022 09: 11
      "The cosmopolitan project - the USSR, had a too ephemeral basis -" social justice "".
      Konstantin Viktorovich, so religion has an ephemeral basis, but who will refuse it. By the way, the ideas of communism are much closer to the commandments of Christ than the morality of consumers and the cult of money. The paradox is that at the same time the communists denied God, and the capitalists, like believing, in fact, were satanists, since what capitalism came to is absolute evil.

      What to do? My personal opinion is that we lost a great country not from the utopianism of socialism, but from insufficient experience of the new system, and, of course, we were outplayed by political cheats, in meanness, duplicity and demagoguery, the Anglo-Saxons, as the masters of world capitalism, have no equal. Plus, their fools and traitors. Our civilization in capitalism does not have a worthy future, and rotten selfish morality will destroy society. There must be ideals, morality must be high, this is the standard to which civilization must strive. It is not so important how everything is achievable here and now, but we must go towards this, we must educate this from childhood.
      1. +2
        30 December 2022 11: 54
        And you wrote well. Found "those" words.
      2. 0
        30 December 2022 12: 01
        Worthy comment. I respect the rejection of slogans and labels in thinking. hi
        we were outplayed by political cheats


        They acted from the point of view of their national interests. The Anglo-Saxons fought with Russia before the Bolsheviks, under the USSR and now.
        What kind of "system" is this if "fools and traitors" get into the head, and some "sharpers" ruin it. I doubt that "sharpers" could have destroyed the Roman Empire or Turkey at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. There were determined talented rulers.

        There must be ideals, morality must be high, this is the standard to which civilization must strive.

        Frankly speaking, I do not see any prerequisites for this. Over thousands of years, wars have grown larger and the weapons of murder more sophisticated. "Individuals" have not become "more moral" in thousands of years. Pedophilia and perverts are now no less and no more than before. The theory of the evolution of society is "nonsense". Not a single "objective" law of development "of society made it possible to look into the future.
        It was not only Blok who noticed the kinship between the utopias of socialism and Christianity. I would prefer that Russia be ruled by people with the morality of "practical gentlemen" than saints and socialists. Otherwise, neighboring peoples will simply take the place of "idealists".

        ps You have a rather alarmist avatar. laughing
        1. 0
          30 December 2022 12: 46
          Quote: samarin1969
          Over thousands of years, wars have grown larger and the weapons of murder more sophisticated.

          A lot has changed over thousands of years, and in any case, at least even the most primitive began to wipe their asses with toilet paper, wash their hands and, at the very least, obey laws that always contain morality.

          It is, of course, easier to do nothing for the development of culture and morality, and it is even easier to corrupt. However, the willing will always find opportunities, and the unwilling will always find reasons. I do not agree with you that "individuals" have not become "more moral over thousands of years", they have become. Simply, society itself continues to either develop or degrade, and individual moral Urody and perverts have always been and will be in it. Our task is to ensure that their number does not become critical.

          The fact that the weapons of murder have become more sophisticated and wars on a larger scale is only one side of the coin, medicine has become more "sophisticated", cinema, charity, world opinion, the Internet and so on have appeared, more than one evil and negativity is developing.

          About "practical gentlemen" ... All the gentlemanship that the Britons gave birth to is a beautiful wrapper of the rotten essence of pirates, thieves and bandits. The elements of this "wrapper", like tuxedos, expensive cigars, cars, were not accidentally sought after by such dregs of society, related entities as Al Capone and similar mafia leaders in the USA or our brothers "in the nobility". To paraphrase, such "gentlemen" do not have permanent friends or enemies, but there are permanent selfish interests for their stomach and penis, plus show-offs, in front of other "primates".

          I repeat, socialism is not a utopia, just as a planned economy and fair laws are not a utopia for the benefit of the whole society, and not thieves and bandits in power.

          PS My avatar is more "militarist" than "alarmist", and thanks for the dialogue.
          1. -1
            30 December 2022 14: 35
            this is a beautiful wrapper of the rotten essence of pirates, thieves and bandits.
            What percentage of terms in metallurgy are anglicisms? Where did at least two-thirds of modern technology come from (yes, the same computers and the Internet)? Who came up with all this implemented?
            1. +1
              30 December 2022 17: 11
              Quote: Bolt Cutter
              What percentage of terms in metallurgy are anglicisms?
              So what? You walk through the streets of Russian cities, how many "anglicisms" there are in the same signboards and names, it is now fashionable. With all this, it is difficult to find a language dumber than English spelling; you cannot read a dictionary without transcription marks. Pronunciation, many sounds are an inarticulate tension of a poorly developed speech apparatus, sort of animal atavisms from primitiveness, and this is the language of international communication. Nevertheless, these guys robbed most of the countries of the world, as they say, from the same Egypt, except that the pyramids were not taken out, the colonizers are fucking. The United States, like a British miscarriage, made a lot of money on world wars, planted a planet on the dollar, the EU is now a puppet in general.

              What can we say about Anglicisms, they are "dancing the girl", although the Anglo-Saxons really did not come up with much, but to introduce, enslave and impose, this cannot be taken away from them. Probably, these parasites have not long left, there is too much blood and troubles on them. Capitalism is in another global crisis, and the richest country, generously printing its green candy wrappers, has the most huge debt. Given that the United States began with separatism, genocide of the indigenous population and the slave trade, these guys have the audacity to teach democracy to the whole world, now imposing the values ​​​​of buggers and lesbians, and changing white racism to flirting with blacks. All recent wars are on their conscience, including the fact that now, in fact, Russians are killing Russians in Ukraine. Okay, they nurtured Hitler, and made an anti-USSR out of Germany, and cannon fodder out of the Germans for their own interests, but there can be no forgiveness for these scum for Ukraine.
              1. -1
                30 December 2022 22: 37
                dumber english spelling hard to find language
                Marivanna put a deuce laughing Languages ​​are measured in all seriousness only Svidomo so far, and their language is out of competition Yes .
                "Anglicisms" in the same signs and names, it is now fashionable.
                The English origin of the terms indicates the discovery/implementation by the British. It's not about fashion.
    3. +2
      30 December 2022 17: 59
      Quote: samarin1969
      To abolish nationality is how to abolish gender.

      the rarest delusion, the basis of the Ottoman Empire was the SLAVES - Janissaries, the main thing is not nationality, the main thing is EDUCATION, which means that the main thing is IDEA
  13. +7
    30 December 2022 06: 52
    Late, delicate Soviet Power, from Brezhnev to Gorbachev, had all the foundations and attributes of the people.

    Its shortcomings, compared with the results of the Russian Federation, are mistakes on the march. NWO illustrates the quality of capitalist Russia.
    1. +8
      30 December 2022 08: 26
      And what quality can there be if the lion's share of the profit goes to a narrow circle of people, and not to the interests of society?
  14. +10
    30 December 2022 07: 42
    on the distortions of collectivization and the tragedies of the builders of the White Sea Canal, on the lines for green sausage and torn tights, the replacement of which could not be bought

    Another personally affected by the bloody regime?
  15. +10
    30 December 2022 07: 56
    Today's Russia has nothing to do with the USSR.
    The fact that many were born in the USSR does not play a role, the Russian Federation is a complete antipode of the USSR, which inherited from the USSR not very necessary social rights, which are being systematically attacked and ... weapons, everything else has been broken into trash in 30 years: from 16- 18% of the share in world GDP has sunk to 1,7%.
    The current Russian Federation was the main gravedigger of the USSR, starting with the declaration of independence !!!! Independence from BIG Russia, in the name of their cheap selfish interests of Yeltsin and co. and those who voted for him in 1990 and 1996, dreams for the country of a real master-fist.
    And the entire "elite" of the current Russian Federation, it seems that they dreamed of being the anti-heroes of the fairy tales of Gaidar and Gianni Rodari: the main bourgeois, the bad guys, the Mastins, the barons of Oranges and Hold the Grabs.
  16. +2
    30 December 2022 08: 43
    The author is not well educated. The article is enthusiastic and a bit feminine. A man, the president of a military brotherhood, should be friends with the history of cause and effect on a single political and economic landscape of Eurasia.
  17. 0
    30 December 2022 09: 19
    The idea of ​​a "Russian world" in the context of global confrontation is flawed, since it deprives Russia of all allies.
  18. +7
    30 December 2022 09: 22
    Meanwhile, Kyrgyzstan canceled the publication of documents in Russian. "It was a successful year for the CIS" (V. Putin).
  19. +7
    30 December 2022 10: 02

    These words from the anthem of the Soviet Union sounded every day at 6 o'clock in the morning from the speakers and "kitchen bottles" in most of the apartments of Soviet citizens.
    Today marks the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR. Congratulations on the holiday to all for whom a country with such a name was not an empty phrase, did not act as a stepmother, did not remain in the memory of a country of mass executions, repressions, factories for the production of cast-iron ingots and rubber products of various numbering ...
    I remember my homeland from the happy years of childhood, when every child in the country was guaranteed this happiest childhood. Let us not bathe in luxury and baths with hot water, but we also did not roam around the basements and viper beds in search of food, like children of the 90s. And in the kindergarten we were fed with delicious food and taken out in the summer to country cottages.
    Yes, at school we had inkwells, pens with No. 11 nibs and notebooks in which we learned to write the letters of the Russian alphabet. I remember that even textbooks were given to us for free.
    A symbolic fare allowed us to move around the city unaccompanied by adults and visit free clubs, sections and children's cinemas, where you could watch children's films for 10 kopecks.
    Not everyone has had an easy time learning. Most of my friends left for vocational schools after eight grades. Only three received higher education. By the way, higher education was not a panacea. Notice boards were full of calls and vacancies.
    It was this period (from birth to adulthood) that guaranteed EVERY child EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IN LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
    Having learned to read independently at the age of five and write in "printed" letters at six, I quite easily mastered the school curriculum, sometimes I took part in mathematical olympiads, city athletics competitions ...
    Thanks to this, I knew that in every city of the Soviet Union there is an enterprise for the production of not only military products, but also consumer goods. Yes, the shoes of the brand "Tsebo" were quoted in quality higher than the products of the factory "Skorokhod", and ordinary reel-to-reel tape recorders were a luxury, but the first TV set "Radiy-B" appeared among the first in our barracks and this did not stop us from watching the whole gang of kids rare black and white cartoons and even movies.
    1. +9
      30 December 2022 10: 28
      And even later, an acquaintance with the foreign film industry took place. Color films began to appear in the Soviet film distribution, striking with their brilliance and realism. There were comedies with Louis de Funes. The most interesting thing is that these stories caused the laughter of Soviet viewers ...
      And there were also “Generals of the sandpits” ... There was a comedy “Vendetta a la Corsican” ... There was a “Bluff” with Adriano Celentano. And we could not even imagine that these stories could soon become a reality in our country.
      * * *
      Now there is no need to waste time searching for the truth and the reasons why the Soviet Union was destroyed. Political "thimble-makers" lured the people into their networks, fooled them with the promises of "Volga" and counters with sausage.
      The only thing left to do is ask yourself:
      “Do you still believe in a bright capitalist “tomorrow” with pyramids, scams and legalized speculation? Do you still see that a mangy bird will bring you happiness (if not to you, then to your children)?”
      That is why in a country where the titular nation is dying out, where promises and promises border on swagger and cynicism, no NATIONAL IDEA has been invented. Capitalism (as well as the slave-owning system) has neither a homeland nor a nationality, because where there is profit, there is also a homeland.
      Socialist principles should not be forgotten. Sooner or later we will return to them. Not us, but our children. History moves in a spiral...
      hi
      1. +2
        30 December 2022 11: 49
        And then there was the movie "The New Spaniards". We watched how the Spanish insurance company came under the control of the Americans with all the bells and whistles and could not even think that in a few years we would have "new Russians".
        Who cares, watch this warning movie.
      2. 0
        30 December 2022 23: 41
        Quote: yuriy55
        “Do you still believe in a bright capitalist “tomorrow” with pyramids, scams and legalized speculation? Do you still see that a mangy bird will bring you happiness (if not to you, then to your children)?”

        A capitalist tomorrow will not bring us happiness, but it is not worth returning to socialism either. As for me, in the near future (well, 100 years) we will face a much more global task than building a new socio-economic formation.
        Quote: yuriy55
        Capitalism (as well as the slave system) has neither homeland nor nationality

        And here you are wrong. The very concept of the nation in its modern form appeared with the development of capitalism. Capitalism gave us the concept of patriotism. It’s just that in Russia feudalism has not yet been properly dismantled, and already they have begun to try to switch to socialism, so some capitalist elements had to be made under a red flag. My personal opinion.
  20. +4
    30 December 2022 11: 10
    If we ourselves here in Russia can build at least a prototype of such a state

    Under the current capitalist system? This is a utopia.
    With the 100th anniversary of the birth of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to all honest people who have not yet lost their mind, honor and conscience for 30 years of crazy life under the laws of the jungle of capitalism.
  21. -5
    30 December 2022 11: 17
    what a stupid agitation)))))) Russia is now a capitalist state with a huge gap between the rich and the poor. In many capitalist states of the West, social guarantees and the standard of living of people are ten times higher than in Russia. And this comrade here tells us stories that after our Russia’s victory will turn into the promised land. That the oligarchs and top managers from the government and the State Duma donate billions to the state treasury or something? He writes some kind of nonsense. There will be no fair social state on the territory of Russia in the next 500 years.
    1. -2
      30 December 2022 14: 37
      the standard of living of people is ten times higher
      2-3 times maximum.
  22. +4
    30 December 2022 11: 20
    . The proposed model of justice, equality and genuine internationalism was so attractive that it outweighed all nationalist and small-town interests.
    it does not have this model in Russia itself and who will build it? Abramovichi? Citizens with foreign passports and villas and yachts? They built their own model for themselves and are satisfied, in Russia there are only resources, and over the hill they keep the most precious money, their children, palaces. What can Russia offer the former Republics, if everyone sees what kind of sloppiness and theft is going on, I think that nothing. We mistakenly compare the USSR and Russia, but this is not so, these are two different countries, two different systems, my Motherland will no longer be sold, and the people have sold it, and many who sold it now are not the last people
  23. +2
    30 December 2022 12: 21
    Very correct article good we have a great past that teaches how to achieve great goals fellow And how can you mow along this path! laughing the main thing to be proud of
    1. 0
      30 December 2022 23: 35
      Quote: Eroma
      the main thing to be proud of

      And someone has nothing? If you look, then items for pride can be found in almost any country.
      1. 0
        1 January 2023 02: 45
        The Germans, for example, have something to be ashamed of! tongue in addition, the scale of the great past can be converted into the possibility of creating an equally great future! fellow
  24. +7
    30 December 2022 12: 55
    I have already said and I will repeat that the collapse of the USSR was by no means a foregone conclusion.
    A system with some flaws, but still had gigantic opportunities for modernization and improvement. And history clearly shows this. This includes the creation of a second superpower in the shortest possible time, victory in the Second World War, Space, and so on.
    The question is in the people who got into the hands of this powerful tool for management.
    And it started with Khrushchev, who broke everything he could reach.
    Starting with ideology, motivation, agriculture, defense, economics, leveling and more.
    We were the FIRST in the world to build a new type of society, one of the pillars of which was to be social justice.
    No one has done this before us, and of course, mistakes, distortions, bruises and bumps along the way were inevitable.
    But all this could be corrected and overcome, and science, the theory of building a new society, was supposed to help in this.
    The theory was created and developed simultaneously with construction.
    No wonder Stalin said, without a theory we die.
    But alas, after Stalin, no one was engaged in theory.
    There were no people of this magnitude capable of this.
    Well, not Khrushchev or Brezhnev. Or, as they said, the Politburo is a collective Lenin.
    So the system just demonstrated gigantic possibilities and potential.
    Which amateurs who came to power as a result of negative selection could not or did not want to use.
    Plus traitors hurried.
    So if an amateur is given a Stradivarius violin in his hands, he still will not play it like Paganini.
    Well, or as the drivers say, it was not the reel, the razdol * bai was sitting in the office.
    Well, or - it's in the gasket between the steering wheel and the seat.
    If an amateur drove a Mercedes into a pole, then it is not the Mercedes that is to blame, but the driver.
    Happy birthday to the greatest country in history - the USSR.
    The country on the foundation of which we exist and the successor of which we are.
    Happy Holidays!
  25. +4
    30 December 2022 13: 38

    Glory to the USSR. It was the largest, strongest, fairest, great and mighty country in the history of mankind.
    1. -1
      30 December 2022 23: 34
      The most powerful country, yes, yes. Only now he couldn’t take something away from the USA. Don't forget that when you praise him. And do not start talking about traitors in power. Since traitors went there, it means that something was very wrong with the KGB and the system of power in general, which means there is a lot with something else that may well elude us from such a short historical distance.
  26. +3
    30 December 2022 14: 11
    Yes, I was born in the USSR and I am proud of it, but my country has been gone for 31 years now, and in order to return it, it will be necessary to get rid of supposedly elites, but in fact thieves and usurpers, which will lead either to big purges or to a civil war, thieves who stole people’s property will not be given away just like that, in general, the people can only work for a pittance and hope that this humiliation will end someday, like all this corruption, the lack of infrastructure, education, medicine and science, some kind of miracle will happen and we are from a country of the 3rd world we will break ahead both in terms of living standards and in terms of development.
  27. +4
    30 December 2022 14: 17
    = Of course, time retouches historical ulcers. Parents, originally from the USSR (not counting the noteworthy liberals), in conversations with children about the past, most likely did not focus on the distortions of collectivization and the tragedies of the builders of the White Sea Canal, on the lines for green sausage and torn tights, replacements for which could not be bought. =
    What tragedy of the builders of the White Sea Canal is the author talking about? Then, by analogy, we can talk about the tragedy of Navalny and similar characters. It is only the Solzhenitsyns of all stripes who lie to us that the "prisoners of the Gulag" are innocent victims of "Stalin's repressions."
    And what kind of "green sausage" is the author talking about? Personally, I have not seen one. "Doctorskaya" has no equal among boiled sausages in its taste. or “Odessa.” Modern cervelats didn't even wash their faces next to them.
    Well, about torn tights. Here the author has a strange logic - you can buy tights, but if they are torn, you can buy a replacement for them FOR NO WAY.
    As long as power is in the hands of the bourgeoisie, there is no need to talk about any reconstruction of the USSR-2, no matter how you call it. The bourgeoisie will not give up power voluntarily. This is an axiom - a well-known truth.
    1. +5
      30 December 2022 16: 05
      Is it really necessary to ruin the country in order for pantyhose with toilet paper to appear?
  28. +4
    30 December 2022 14: 46
    .
    Quote: samarin1969
    They acted from the point of view of their national interests. The Anglo-Saxons fought with Russia before the Bolsheviks, under the USSR and now.
    What kind of "system" is this if "fools and traitors" get into the head, and some "sharpers" ruin it. I doubt that "sharpers" could have destroyed the Roman Empire or Turkey at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. There were determined talented rulers.


    1. There are no "national interests" in a class society. There are the interests of the elite, which it passes off as national.
    2. And where is this Roman Empire? What about the Ottoman Porte? Moreover - where is the British Empire, on which the sun did not set, according to Kipling? The latter, by the way, was ruined by their own gentlemen when they found a more suitable alternative - the United States.

    Any system can be destroyed from the inside with the proper motivation and the necessary funds.
    1. 0
      30 December 2022 22: 04
      Quote: Illanatol
      Any system can be destroyed from the inside with the proper motivation and the necessary funds.

      Somehow in the comments I read an interesting phrase: "empires are created thanks to an idea!". When a nation has a goal, it overcomes any difficulties, all empires fall apart because of reaching the limits of growth! Then an internal struggle for power begins, for a large share, etc., all empires perish in the same way: collapse from within! feel
      1. +1
        30 December 2022 22: 34
        Quote: Eroma
        and, all empires fall apart because of reaching the limits of growth!

        most likely not so, the Idea fizzles out and the Elites degenerate, growth is a relative concept, the growth of the territory, the growth of welfare, scientific growth, etc.
        when the limit of growth as a territory is reached, the entire "ecumene" is captured, you can redirect the Idea and start the growth of science, but when the Idea died or it was discredited, then everything
  29. -6
    30 December 2022 17: 08
    What is the greatness of that country. Food and goods on coupons, a large army that undermined the economy, a downtrodden population? All this led to a predictable collapse and it has a future.
    1. +3
      30 December 2022 17: 39
      The degradation of the government led to the collapse, as they say: The fish rots from the head.
      China did not allow this, and now their economy is like that of the United States.

      As for coupons, I can say that they are still used in capitalist countries.
      Even gift certificates are sold, these are essentially coupons, you give them to your loved ones, and they go shopping.

      Food stamps for the poor.
      Wood coupons in Europe.
    2. +2
      30 December 2022 17: 47
      Quote from Olegs
      What is the greatness of that country. Food and goods on coupons, a large army that undermined the economy, a downtrodden population? All this led to a predictable collapse and it has a future.

      Is it true? Only in zhrachke greatness? Well, for pigs, only a full trough is the most important thing.
      Have you tried going to the market? Everything was there without coupons.
  30. +2
    30 December 2022 18: 45
    Spiritual, historical bonds and values ​​are the key to all the victories and power of Russia!

    "The highest and most characteristic feature of our people is a sense of justice and a thirst for it" (F. M. Dostoevsky)

    December 30, 2022 is a significant date in the history of our Motherland - the 100th anniversary of the formation of the unforgettable USSR! The Soviet Union will forever remain in our memory as a bright, beautiful and reliable Home, in which it was warm, comfortable and cozy for all fraternal peoples living on 1/6 of the planet's territory.

    We remember, we honor, we love, we are proud! And of course, we dream of the revival of the main, almost completely lost values ​​of our Great Motherland: bright Spirituality, genuine Equality, social Justice, a sense of true friendship, mutual assistance and collectivism at a new qualitative level, taking into account the mistakes of the past.

    We all come from the unforgettable USSR,
    Someone is a hundred, well, someone is thirty ...
    The ideas of good and valiant victories are an example,
    Calls us to return to those sources of light!

    As the bitter experience of life under the conditions of wild capitalism, born of betrayal, greed and unscrupulousness of the bourgeois elites, convincingly shows, brazenly, contrary to the constitutional will of gullible citizens, expressed at the 1991 referendum, who destroyed and plundered the USSR, only an alien minority, intentionally or thoughtlessly leading the country into a dead end of socio-economic stagnation with hopeless poverty for the main part of the population, barely surviving on the shameful Living Wage and / or minimum wage, 30-50% of which goes to pay for housing and communal services (in the USSR, rent costs amounted to 3-5% of average wages and pensions).

    And all this is cynically happening in the world's richest country in natural resources, and in the conditions of an abundance of oil and dollars, when the incomes of the self-proclaimed bourgeois elites are dozens, and sometimes hundreds of times higher than the salaries and pensions of the hypocritically deceived and robbed people. At the same time, for 3 decades the state continues to derisively evade fulfillment of its main duties established by Articles 2 and 7 of the Russian Constitution to "create conditions that ensure a decent life and free development of a person." for all citizens, and not just for parasitic in luxury, insatiable "elites".

    After all, the children of the devil did not strive for democracy,
    Wealth, perversion and power were at stake.
    And all the villains urgently turned to liberals,
    To appropriate the national treasury with impunity.

    For the legitimacy of their criminal actions,
    Insidiously carried out the bankruptcy of the country's economy.
    To hide the cynicism of privatization consequences,
    The absurdity of the auctions was played according to the laws of Satan.

    All results are enshrined in the Basic Law,
    Giving the looted private property a look,
    What now allows them to broadcast about their fair share,
    The merits of personal and rights to the title of unshakable elites ...

    stihi.ru/2014/03/22/2380

    Today, when Russia, largely due to the criminal negligence and obvious irresponsibility of the bourgeois elites and the treachery of the collectively Russophobic West, has found itself not only in conditions of immoral sanctions, but also in a vile hybrid war at the hands of the "pro-NATO Ukroreich", all the vices of wild capitalism and the miscalculations of the bourgeois elites have painfully manifested themselves in all spheres of the life of the state and society and require immediate measures and systemic solutions to save the Fatherland, which are possible only if the government, the army and the people are united. And here we cannot do without the revival of historical values ​​and the experience of our wise ancestors. Modern Russia has only two real allies - the Army, the Navy and the United People!

    Capitalism in Russia is a vile step backwards:
    You cannot serve God and Mammon at the same time.
    The spirit of justice requires neither gold nor rewards,
    He longs to rise again with equal rights on the throne.

    To live in your country with dignity, happily ever after,
    It is not enough for us to change the essence of the laws and the system of power.
    We need unity and the will of the people, as a living force of reason,
    Able to effectively maintain control over power!

    To do this, we need to share power and money,
    And to allow only the wise righteous to power,
    By law, exclude luxury and poverty from the essence of life,
    And only then will we be worthy of the title of Reasonable Beings!

    According to the Constitution of Russia, the People are the Master and Creator of their country,
    We are all responsible for the Fatherland and the fate of future generations.
    No! Democracy for the "chosen" - we must boldly say,
    And choose the good of justice to replace the greed of creatures!

    I believe that the Fatherland will be reborn,
    And trials will only unite the people!
    And the fanatics will return with a boomerang,
    The stench of vile deeds - violence stronghold ...

    Raise the Flag of Victory proudly
    Over Donbass, Kyiv, Dnieper.
    Banner of the Fatherland come back as soon as possible,
    To again proudly soar over the Kremlin!

    stihi.ru/2017/10/27/3378
  31. -1
    30 December 2022 19: 43
    There were a lot of good things, and a lot of bad things. Now all nostalgia for the USSR is dreams of youth.
    1. +1
      30 December 2022 22: 13
      Quote: Dmitry Karabanov
      There was a lot of good, there was also bad

      who argues with this
      Quote: Dmitry Karabanov
      nostalgia for the USSR is a dream of youth

      but one can argue with this, by the way, this is also refuted by age samples of opinion polls
    2. +1
      31 December 2022 19: 21
      Then, according to this anti-Soviet training manual, the enemies of the USSR of the older generation had neither childhood nor youth, and they were born immediately as evil old men.
  32. 0
    30 December 2022 21: 03
    Yes, to beat, such a country was pissed off by the communists themselves, EBN, tuvar, he made his entire career in the party, and then he put it there without diapers ..... Who interfered with development? No one, just local responsible comrades decided to become kings ... And so it happened .. Nevertheless, I am also from the Born in USSR tribe
  33. 0
    30 December 2022 23: 29
    Since they wrote about the youth here, I will speak out as a representative of it.
    First, I want to note about this:
    No matter what anyone says, it was the Soviet Union that actually forced Britain, France and other colonial powers to abolish modern slavery in their overseas territories.
    It was we who protected many peoples in Asia, Africa and Latin America from American neo-colonialism.

    Spit on all of Asia, Africa and America from the high bell tower, honestly. Let the British blacks there, even in a bioreactor for fertilizer, process in front of their children and parents. If it does not harm me personally and my country as a whole and does not threaten to harm in the future, then I do not care. Yes, pissing off the British is always good, but that's exactly what "pissing off the British by freeing the blacks", and not "freeing the blacks, at the same time pissing the British."
    Secondly, from the distance of the current years, I can’t see that then there could be confidence in something. No, in the year 85, maybe they were sure of something, but I, from the 22nd, know for sure that if anyone was, he was a fool.
    Thirdly, I still consider the Soviet Union to be the best period in our history, because, as was rightly noted in the article, Russia has never possessed similar power in the international arena either before or after. And not because of some kind of confidence in the eyes - it's all subjective.
    In the end, I will just give my opinion. Alas, the USSR failed to use its colossal power correctly. When he got into trouble, he could use his military, his industry, his influence... to start milking the surrounding countries. To squeeze everything out of Poland, from Germany, to pump out the same ore from Afghanistan, and not to build the notorious hospitals and schools, one could come to Africa for cheap resources, and when oil prices fell, the USSR still, I believe, had sufficient power to arrange a huge war in the Middle East and thereby solve their problems with oil. But nothing was done. I note with regret that the current leaders picked up from their Soviet predecessors the disease of playing good uncles. I hope that by the time we turn 40-50 years old, and the time will come to take over, we will not be infected with this.
  34. +1
    1 January 2023 01: 13
    modern Russia, especially the authorities, are demonstratively distancing themselves from the Soviet Union in all areas, except for those that they like.
    For example, they use the Great Victory very well, although they do not mention that it was the Soviet Union that won along with the Communist Party. And that he won precisely because he was a socialist country.
    Because a strike of such force as in 41 would probably not have been able to withstand even the United States.
    And now again talk about the Russian world. The Soviet Union had a great idea of ​​internationalism when it doesn't matter what nationality you are.
  35. +1
    1 January 2023 01: 14
    Quote: Plate
    When he got into trouble, he could use his military, his industry, his influence... to start milking the surrounding countries.

    This completely contradicted what the Soviet Union declared in the form of domestic and foreign policy.
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. 0
    1 January 2023 11: 08
    Times and customs change, but the Russian spirit remains. In modern conditions there can no longer be any Union.
    Only a tough protectorate and enforcement of peace.
  38. -1
    3 January 2023 13: 29
    There is not a single ideal country in the world that does not have "dark spots" in its history. Therefore, the history of your Fatherland must be accepted any, with all its mistakes, distortions, shortcomings, wars, idealism. This is the Motherland. In it we were born. Have grown up. They received an excellent education. Before scolding her for her mistakes, you first need to do SOMETHING good for her, and then talk about the shortcomings. It is important to do something SPECIFIC in order to eliminate them. How can you throw mud at your country?! If someone does not like his homeland, then please leave. Look for your paradise.