How the Germans changed the sign on the map of the southern provinces of Russia

44
How the Germans changed the sign on the map of the southern provinces of Russia
Pavel Skoropadsky (in the foreground on the right) and the Germans. 1918


Occupation of Little and New Russia


Austro-German troops easily occupied Little Russia and New Russia ("Foreigners will help us!" How the Rada sold Russian Ukraine to the Germans; Part 2). The old Russian army was destroyed by the Februaryist revolutionaries, and the new Red Army was in its infancy. The Red Guards could fight the same small, poorly trained and armed detachments of the future "whites", nationalists and just bandits. But nothing could be done against the regular, well-organized, armed and trained troops of Germany and Austria-Hungary.



There was simply no one and nothing to fight. Therefore, the invaders easily and practically without a fight occupied Kyiv, Odessa, Nikolaev, Kherson, Chernigov and Poltava in March 1918. In April, the Germans and Austrians occupied Sumy, Yekaterinoslav and Kharkov. In early May, the German-Austrian troops reached the line Novozybkov - Novgorod-Seversky - Mikhailovsky farm - Belgorod - Valuyki - Millerovo. The Germans did not go further, concluding a truce with the Soviet command.

The Germans moved into the Crimea. Simferopol fell on April 22. Detachments of Crimean Tatars helped the Germans. There was a threat of the fall of Sevastopol and the capture fleet the Germans. Almost immediately it became clear that the peninsula and the main base of the fleet could not be defended. The decomposed Black Sea Fleet, despite the presence of powerful warships, coastal artillery, huge arsenals, numbered crews, could not repeat the heroic defense of the Crimean War model. There were no people ready to organize defense and fight to the death. Therefore, it was decided to withdraw the fleet to Novorossiysk, which was not ready to receive such a number of ships and vessels.

The commander of the fleet, Admiral Sablin, wanted to cheat and ordered the Ukrainian flag to be raised on the ships. Komflot sent a peaceful delegation to Simferopol, but General von Kosch refused to accept it and continued the offensive. Most of the crews refused to raise the flag of Ukraine, and on April 29 - May 2, they took the most combat-ready ships to Novorossiysk. But a significant part of the ships, on which there were not enough people or they needed repair and replacement of mechanisms, was captured by the enemy. So, the Germans captured 7 battleships (for example, Eustathius, John Chrysostom, Rostislav), 3 cruisers, 12 destroyers, 5 mother ships, 3 Romanian auxiliary cruisers. The Ukrainian flag did not help; on May 3, it was lowered on all the captured ships.


Rada is a useless puppet


When the Germans occupied Kyiv, they brought the Central Rada in their convoy. "Ukrainophiles" settled in the building of the Pedagogical Institute on Volodymyrska Street and returned to their usual business - party debates.

The Germans were interested in something else. The real master of the Russian Ukraine was the commander of the Kyiv Army Group, Field Marshal Hermann von Eichhorn. Under his command was an army of 250 thousand bayonets and sabers. On March 28, 1918, the field marshal expressed his opinion on power very clearly:

“People in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs still don’t understand that we should rule in Ukraine, and the Ukrainian government should dance to our tune.”

The Germans quickly put things in order in Kyiv and wanted to solve the food problem. The Central Powers continued the war with the Entente. The economic potential of the German bloc was on the verge of exhaustion. Boys were already being taken into the army, the people were malnourished and were under the threat of starvation. The army and the country needed bread. Therefore, the occupation of Little Russia, which was the breadbasket of Russia, was very helpful.

Berlin's policy was simple. The Germans supported the Rada by force when it had already lost the war to the Bolsheviks due to its extreme senselessness and complete lack of support from the people. The central council was supposed to ensure the supply of food and raw materials. The Germans were in the role of "roof". However, the Germans quickly realized that the Rada was an empty shell. It not only cannot pursue an independent foreign policy, defend itself, but also solve pressing internal problems.

The economy of Little Russia was a real disaster. So, the Ukrainian authorities were unable to establish industrial production in the lands of Novorossia and Donbass occupied with the help of the Germans. In 1916, iron smelting in the Little Russian provinces of the Russian Empire amounted to 18,6 million pounds. In 1917 it was reduced to 14,3 million poods, and in 1918 these figures had already collapsed to 1,8 million poods.

The able-bodied male population was conscripted, fled, the use of female and child labor increased sharply, which led to a sharp drop in labor productivity. Thus, labor productivity in the coal industry in 1918 decreased by 1917 times compared to the level of 9, and by 1916 times compared to the level of 16,5. From January 1 to May 1, 1918, 200 million poods of coal were mined in the mines, for the same period in 1917, 574 million poods of coal were mined.

Things were no better in the agricultural sector. The German authorities tried at any cost to ensure the supply of provisions, raw materials to their homeland. German military courts-martial raged in the village. Naturally, this aroused the resistance of the peasantry. Provisions were exported from the country, goods were not imported. There was a food problem - the threat of general hunger in the richest agricultural region.

As the general and future hetman Skoropadsky rightly noted on this occasion:

“All generations of current Ukrainian figures have been brought up in the theatre, from where came the love for all theatricality and passion not so much for the essence of the matter as for its external form. For example, many Ukrainians really believed that with the announcement of independent Ukraine in the Central Rada, the Ukrainian state is an irrefutable fact. For them, the Ukrainian sign was already something that they considered unshakable.”

Since the Rada cannot manage and organize the flow of grain to Germany, then the "Ukrainian sign" can be changed. Replace with a more capable government.

It should be noted that there was another view of the Ukrainian problem.

Austro-Hungarian troops occupied Odessa and Yekaterinoslav (now the Dnieper). The Austrians wanted to create another "flap" of their empire - a monarchical state headed by a prince from the Habsburg dynasty. This role was to be played by Wilhelm Franz of Habsburg-Lorraine. During the war he served in the 13th Galician Lancers Regiment. Then he was appointed commander of the Sich Riflemen. The archers called him Vasil and put on an embroidered shirt on him, which is why he received the nickname "Vasil the Embroidered".

Change of sign


But the Germans played the first role in the Allied tandem, so the decision was theirs. For the role of the new ruler of the Russian Ukraine, the Germans planned Pavel Skoropadsky - a native of the Little Russian aristocracy, a large landowner, a former adjutant general of the retinue of Tsar Nicholas II, who during the war years commanded a cavalry regiment, brigade, divisions and 34th army corps. At the direction of the Provisional Government and Commander-in-Chief Kornilov, he was engaged in the "Ukrainization" of his corps (1st Ukrainian Corps).

After the October Revolution, Skoropadsky recognized the power of the Central Rada, was appointed commander of all the UNR troops on the Right Bank. However, Ukrainian politicians, who for the most part were "parsleys" and were afraid of the military general, who enjoyed authority in the troops, forced him to resign. Skoropadsky became the leader of the right-wing forces (large landowners, industrialists, merchants, financiers and the military) who wanted an "iron hand".

On April 25, by order of the Central Rada, the banker Abram Dobry was kidnapped, through whom the German authorities carried out some financial transactions. The Kyiv banker was a member of the financial commission of the Rada, the director of a branch of the Russian Bank, and was a member of the Ukrainian-German economic commission. The banker made a "gesheft" with the Germans, which, against the background of the seizure of "surpluses" and the German "order" in the village, angered the nationalists. Dobry also prepared the financial basis for the future "power" of Skoropadsky. Therefore, the operation to capture him was prepared by the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Mikhail Tkachenko, and conducted by the director of the political department of this department, Gaevsky.

This was the reason for the response of Field Marshal Eichhorn. On April 25, an order was issued to protect Kyiv, German field courts were introduced. The Rada protested. On April 28, 1918, a German patrol entered a meeting of the Central Rada, arrested the ministers of the UNR power bloc, and sent the deputies home. There was no resistance. The Rada did not have a real army, and the people were indifferent to this bunch of talkers. There was no serious support from the Rada and in Kyiv itself. At the same time, no one in Kyiv touched the most prominent leaders of the UNR, like Grushevsky and Petlyura.

The next day after the dissolution of the CR in the circus building (which is very symbolic for this era), the congress of Ukrainian grain growers, which united all the opponents of the Ukrainian socialists, landowners, proclaimed Pavlo Skoropadsky the hetman of Ukraine. Surrounded by officer guards, the general himself arrived. He thanked for the proposed power and graciously agreed to accept it. The program of the new government included the promise of land reform in the near future, in the present land ownership was preserved. In the evening, a thanksgiving service was held on Sofiyskaya Square.

Skoropadsky issued the first law of the new state:

"By this act, I declare myself Hetman of Ukraine."

Naturally, all this could only happen with the consent of the German military. Therefore, the head of the UNR government, Vinnichenko, called what happened in the circus "a dull German-general operetta." True, the Rada itself was also the same theater.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    24 December 2022 07: 45
    At the direction of the Provisional Government and Commander-in-Chief Kornilov, he was engaged in the "Ukrainization" of his corps (1st Ukrainian Corps).

    Wow, how it is! However, the author has seditious thoughts, he argues with the Guarantor, but we were sure that it was Lenin and Ukraine who "planted the bomb", and it looks like it comes out.)))
    1. -2
      24 December 2022 08: 39
      So he "planted" and not only with Ukraine. And how does it come out ... let's start with the Austro-Hungarian policy of Ukrainization, or, in ideological terms, reach the Polish nationalists. Moreover, such "Ukrainization" met with rebuff among the population.
      It is necessary to separate flies from cutlets - a form of government from the introduction of ideas. Ideas change, and the form of government (as practice shows), as long as the state exists, is unshakable. And when the policy of nationalization is also imposed on the national republics and autonomies (arbitrarily cut, without taking into account the ethnic composition of the population) (they create writing for peoples who do not have it, a separate national culture, literary languages), then excuse me, they also put a detonator into this "bomb" .
      1. +14
        24 December 2022 10: 21
        Quote: Dismas
        Ideas change, and the form of government (as practice shows), as long as the state exists, is unshakable.

        That's even how? Those. the form of government in ancient Athens, the empire of Charlemagne, the French Republic, the USSR and the Russian Empire "(as practice shows), as long as the state exists - unshakable"? Isn't it funny yourself?
        Quote: Dismas
        let's go back to the Austro-Hungarian policy of Ukrainization

        Let's first define what Ukrainization is! Under the USSR, for some time, I lived in Uzbekistan, the school had a subject - the Uzbek language, signs were in both Russian and Uzbek, there was a cinema named after Alisher Navoi, everyone knew who Ulukbek was, Abu Ali ibn Sina (Avicena), monuments of Uzbek culture, very beautiful, by the way, etc. were protected and restored. etc.. Say this is "Uzbekization"? If yes, then I welcome such "Uzbekization" with both hands.
        Quote: Dismas
        It is necessary to separate flies from cutlets - a form of government from the introduction of ideas.

        The form of the state is determined by the prevailing socio-economic relations, it is these same socio-economic relations that determine the state ideology. There is no other way.)))
        Quote: Dismas
        And when the policy of nationalization is also imposed on the national republics and autonomies (arbitrarily cut, without taking into account the ethnic composition of the population) (they create writing for peoples who do not have it, a separate national culture, literary languages), then excuse me, they also put a detonator into this "bomb" .

        That is, if, for example, a written language is created for the Yakuts, Khanty or Mansi, their language and national culture are protected and maintained, is it a detonator being put into a "bomb"? Should the Anglo-Americans treat the Indians with them? Maybe, like blacks in the USA, offer to use them as slaves? What you wrote is pure Nazism and chauvinism, one underestimated Austrian artist tried to do this, as a result, is it impressive?
        Quote: Dismas
        So he "planted" and not only with Ukraine.

        So you can be more detailed, what kind of bomb did Lenin plant for you?
        1. -2
          24 December 2022 10: 34
          In Ukraine, everything was in reverse. I studied in Kharkov in 80, so there were no signs in Russian, everything was in Ukrainian.
          1. +10
            24 December 2022 10: 46
            Quote from Deon59
            In Ukraine, everything was in reverse. I studied in Kharkov in 80, so there were no signs in Russian, everything was in Ukrainian.

            Tales don't need to be told! My relatives live in Zaporozhye, we often visited there, traveled all over eastern Ukraine. After the Belovezhskaya Accords, all sorts of "perucarni" and others appeared without signs in Russian, nationalist organizations supported by the state appeared, etc. Why nationalism began to be supported by sub-states formed on the ruins of the USSR, there is no need to explain, and it’s clear, no?
            1. -3
              24 December 2022 13: 09
              When I entered the military school, Ukrainians were allowed to take an exam in Ukrainian. I don’t know how in Zaparozhye in Kharkov the menu in the perucarne was in Ukrainian
              1. 0
                24 December 2022 19: 37
                Quote from Deon59
                When I entered the military school, Ukrainians were allowed to take an exam in Ukrainian

                I do not know, maybe. I lived in Armavir, there was (and is) a pedagogical institute, and so several groups studied there from Turkmenistan, they didn’t speak Russian very much, maybe they also passed Turkmen in their homeland.
                1. +2
                  26 December 2022 09: 01
                  I still live in Uzbekistan. In the Soviet years, everything was clear: signs, all signs in the metro, voice announcements (even the inscriptions on the glass "Do not lean") were in two languages. Schools were (and still are) teaching in Russian and Uzbek (the former teach Uzbek, the latter Russian). Universities also had two languages ​​of instruction - the same specialty had 2 groups of instruction (in Russian and in Uzbek). Now something remains, but in general it is worse of course. The culture and traditions of the indigenous population in the Uzbek SSR (unlike the same Anglo-Saxons) were supported (or at least not interfered), ancient monuments were restored, there were national poets, writers, artists, theaters, etc. In neighboring Kazakhstan, where we periodically visit relatives, the language situation was similar to Uzbekistan.
              2. +4
                25 December 2022 16: 52
                I don’t know how in Zaparozhye in Kharkov the menu in the perucarne was in Ukrainian
                Wow, the menu at the barbershop....ah, I get it, "Triple Cologne" and "Chypre"........
            2. +4
              24 December 2022 13: 46
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Tales don't need to be told!

              So he was born in the 80s. When he learned to read, the Union was gone...
              1. +1
                24 December 2022 16: 15
                Quote from U_GOREC
                So he was born in the 80s. When he learned to read, the Union was gone...

                Well, yes, apparently. It is impossible that there were no signs in two languages, according to the law it was supposed to be so. I was in Lithuania in the 86th, there were inscriptions in two languages. The name of the branded train, Lituva (if I was not mistaken), just did not translate into Russian.)))
                1. +1
                  24 December 2022 20: 15
                  In 1980 I entered a military school, I don’t know how in Lithuania, in Estonia in 1984 everything was in Estonian.
                  1. 0
                    24 December 2022 20: 22
                    Quote from Deon59
                    In 1980 I entered a military school, I don’t know how in Lithuania, in Estonia in 1984 everything was in Estonian.

                    We still won’t prove anything to each other, since we only have personal memories, and we are unlikely to find any documentary evidence over the years. hi
                    1. +1
                      24 December 2022 20: 51
                      How old were you in 80, and were you in Ukraine during these years. Can you also tell me that there were no theaters in the Ukrainian language, as in 2008 one type from Lviv flooded me.
                      1. +3
                        24 December 2022 21: 03
                        Quote from Deon59
                        How old were you in 80, and were you in Ukraine during these years. Can you also tell me that there were no theaters in the Ukrainian language, as in 2008 one type from Lviv flooded me.

                        I was born in 1969 We traveled to Ukraine almost every year, both from Uzbekistan and from the Krasnodar Territory. Theaters in Ukraine. I have not been to the theaters, but I suspect that they were there and the same in Ukrainian. Because in Maikop, for example, there has always been a theater in Adyghe, at least a certain number of productions in Adyghe have always been, and in Uzbekistan the same.
                      2. +2
                        26 December 2022 08: 06
                        He poured garbage on you! Everywhere there were national theaters with productions in their native language. As were the theaters in Russian! He lived all his life in Belarus, was born and raised here - and your opponent))) there is absolutely no faith!
                        Although, what to take from the village ...
                      3. 0
                        26 December 2022 14: 47
                        I don’t think that the Uzbek SSR or the BSSR were anything special, it was probably the same in all the republics. The same Uzbek Academic National Drama Theater (then named after Khamza) was located not so far from my place of residence. It was actually created in 1914. Performances in it were mostly in Uzbek. At the same time, the Gorky Russian Drama Theater also existed. New Year's performances for children were played in two languages. Performances in the Youth Theater or puppet theater were played in 2 languages. The Uzbekfilm studio functioned quite well, making films in the Uzbek language. There were 3 TV channels on TV - 1st, 2nd all-union (essno broadcasting in Russian) and a local television channel (I did not watch it, but the Akhborot news program was definitely broadcast in 2 languages). By the way, when I visited you in Minsk last December, I was very surprised that communication was mainly in Russian. Uzbek prevails in our country, regional people often do not know Russian anymore.
                    2. 0
                      2 January 2023 10: 39
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      We won’t prove anything to each other anyway, since we only have personal memories, and we are unlikely to find any documentary evidence over the years

                      A matter of time and will...
                      Offhand, there are photographs of those times, including those with signs.
                      GOST (or OST) for signs was also probably there.
                      There would be a desire
          2. +6
            24 December 2022 21: 23
            I studied in Kharkov in 80, so there were no signs in Russian, everything was in Ukrainian.

            Just don't lie. If you studied in Kharkov in 1980, then this place should be familiar to you.

            And that too.
        2. +6
          24 December 2022 11: 53
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          So you can be more detailed, what kind of bomb did Lenin plant for you?

          Under the bomb, most likely, Lenin means the creation, in theory, of independent REPUBLICS with free entry and exit from the Union. Unlike the "autonomization" plan proposed by Stalin, with the support of Dzerzhinsky,
          1. +8
            24 December 2022 12: 25
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Unlike the "autonomization" plan proposed by Stalin, with the support of Dzerzhinsky,

            This plan would not have saved the country from what happened in the 90s either. They tore the country apart in order to shove public property into their pockets, and then they squeal that it was Lenin who "planted the bomb" on them.
            1. +2
              25 December 2022 14: 36
              Saved would not have saved ... we do not know. It was just that this plan was technically unfeasible.
            2. +2
              25 December 2022 17: 34
              It will take many years until the dirt of which the hump builders marali history will be cleaned out, and Khrushchev's feces too. I believe in one thing, yet this time will come.
            3. 0
              4 March 2023 14: 27
              And by the way, yes, the beneficiaries of the destruction of the USSR tell us about a terrible mega-bomb from the evil Lenin.
              There is reason to wonder if they are lying in order to avert suspicion from themselves.
          2. +8
            24 December 2022 16: 40
            To say that the country fell apart because of the possible free entry and exit is the same as saying that there are many divorces because you can get divorced.
          3. +4
            25 December 2022 14: 35
            Lenin proceeded from the realities already existing at that time. For there was no longer an empire as such, and autonomization simply would not have happened.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +2
          25 December 2022 14: 49
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          Let's first define what Ukrainization is! Under the USSR, for some time, I lived in Uzbekistan, the school had a subject - the Uzbek language, signs were in both Russian and Uzbek, there was a cinema named after Alisher Navoi, everyone knew who Ulukbek was, Abu Ali ibn Sina (Avicena), monuments of Uzbek culture, very beautiful, by the way, etc. were protected and restored. etc.. Say this is "Uzbekization"? If yes, then I welcome with both hands such "Uzbekization

          Ukrainization is the forced imposition of the Ukrainian language on the territory of Ukraine and the Kuban, as well as the forced entry into Ukrainians of the Russian and Russian-screaming population of these same territories. In Uzbekistan, the forced imposition of the Uzbek language and the recording of Tajiks as Uzbeks.
          1. +1
            25 December 2022 19: 43
            Quote: Alexey Sedykin
            the forced imposition of the Ukrainian language on the territory of Ukraine and the Kuban, as well as the forced recording of the Russian and Russian-speaking population of these same territories as Ukrainians.

            There was no forced imposition of the Ukrainian language in the Kuban. As well as forced recording in Ukrainians.
        5. +1
          25 December 2022 15: 10
          Russian was taught in all Soviet republics. This was done so that the Russian language was a formative language and that schoolchildren from each republic could enter and study in higher educational institutions in the desired specialty. Students from different republics studied in Sverdlovsk educational institutions, institutes and universities. The reason was simple, there was no nationalism. Everyone treated each other like human beings. This firmly rallied everyone, even decades later there were meetings of those who studied together. And they sent their children to study, of course, to the alma mater, where they studied themselves. It was so family, and suddenly everything broke down for the grandchildren, real disgusting, and for this they built almost a mausoleum, burn with him.
          1. 0
            25 December 2022 19: 31
            Quote: zenion
            It was so family, and suddenly everything broke down for the grandchildren, real disgusting, and for this they built almost a mausoleum, burn with him.

            It would be possible and I would put 10 pluses.
      2. +1
        25 December 2022 14: 51
        Quote: Dismas
        So he "planted" and not only with Ukraine. And how does it come out ... let's start with the Austro-Hungarian policy of Ukrainization, or, in ideological terms, reach the Polish nationalists. Moreover, such "Ukrainization" met with rebuff among the population.
        It is necessary to separate flies from cutlets - a form of government from the introduction of ideas. Ideas change, and the form of government (as practice shows), as long as the state exists, is unshakable. And when the policy of nationalization is also imposed on the national republics and autonomies (arbitrarily cut, without taking into account the ethnic composition of the population) (they create writing for peoples who do not have it, a separate national culture, literary languages), then excuse me, they also put a detonator into this "bomb" .

        In general, we had non-literate peoples only in Siberia ...
    2. +1
      24 December 2022 16: 33
      Well, the fact that they wanted to raise some kind of Ukrainian flag on the ship, and even the Germans brought the Ukrainian leadership in a convoy ... but it was all invented by Lenin
      1. +1
        25 December 2022 14: 28
        Quote: Mikhail Krivopalov
        Well, the fact that they wanted to raise some kind of Ukrainian flag on the ship, and even the Germans brought the Ukrainian leadership in a convoy ... but it was all invented by Lenin

        I don’t understand one thing from the author ... if the Germans brought Rada in a wagon train, then what kind of Rada has been meeting in Kyiv since February 17th, and which Skoropadsky dispersed?
        1. +1
          25 December 2022 14: 44
          If I am not mistaken, in March 1917 (before the October Revolution) the Rada was created.
          1. +2
            25 December 2022 14: 58
            Quote: Mikhail Krivopalov
            If I am not mistaken, in March 1917 (before the October Revolution) the Rada was created.

            Well, yes. In fact, they began to sit in February. In March, they agreed among themselves :)
    3. 0
      25 December 2022 15: 00
      Of course, Lenin planted the bomb, because he did not forbid it to be planted. If he forbade planting what he did not have, a sailor floating bomb in the Ukrainian steppes, then now there would be no war and those who unleashed it. Starting a war is very easy. This is a dust-proof bag tied on both sides. In order for the war to start, the bag must be untied from both sides, which was successfully done. Rumor has it that Lenin himself tied the bag on both sides, but this is not beneficial for the current warriors. The interesting thing about this is that this bag still cannot be found, like a Jewish box from God.
  2. 0
    24 December 2022 07: 56
    These circus and operetta traditions have forever soaked into the spirit of Ukrainians. Therefore, they love clowns so much and put them as heads of state.
    1. -3
      24 December 2022 08: 23
      Ze won in a fair fight. He promised more.
      - Promise everything at once, and we will hang later.
      As now, I did not find Western Galician surnames.
      All "Russians" and Little Russians.
      Now they also write: we are supported, only Bandera against Moscow.
      1. +1
        25 December 2022 09: 01
        Quote: antivirus
        As now, I did not find Western Galician surnames.

        Where did you look for them? If in SMD (means of mass debilitation), then there, just, very often Galician surnames.
  3. +5
    24 December 2022 10: 31
    Well, is it really impossible to find two articles for the "History" section at least on the weekend, in which there would be history, and not Samsonism and Frolovism?!
    1. +2
      24 December 2022 15: 44
      which would have a story
      Uh huh.. smile The story from "History", left, to a distant cordon
  4. +2
    24 December 2022 10: 52
    If Skoropadsky succeeded in carrying out what he had planned, then in the history lessons about who dug out the Black Sea and poured the Carpathian Mountains, they would have been teaching for a hundred years, Ukraine would have been from the Black Sea to Vladivostok, with a small Russian province with the provincial city of Moscow.
    The very cunning Skoropadsky had two options. Either lead a nationalist Ukrainian movement not of a "universal scale" on your own and creeping competitors will bang you into such a post, or do it "universally" riding on the neck of Russian officers and the "Russian" part of the cabinet of ministers.
    So, in his letter to all citizens and Cossacks, Skoropadsky assigned Ukraine the role of the future of Russia on the foundations of Ukraine, without Russia as such. Like, on other principles, on federal principles, the former greatness and strength of the State should be recreated. And in this federation itself, Ukraine should take the first formative place, because order and legality have already begun from Ukraine, they say, and within its borders for the first time all humbled and citizens of the former Russia oppressed by the Bolshevik despot. From it, from Ukraine, not only federalization based on Ukraine should come, but friendship and unity with the glorious Great Don, the valiant Kuban and the Terek Cossacks should come. On these principles, all the other peoples of Europe and the world, without exception, will support the policy Ukraine. Ukraine itself should act as the leader of this process and project in the creation of the federation. In achieving this goal lies the key to the economic and cultural prosperity of the entire Ukrainian people on the solid foundations of national and state identity ...
    As you can see, there were a long time ago such "Ostapovs" who "carried" in Ukraine. Not the current pioneers there. Rather, rogues. But how Skoropadsky then tried to deceive and lull the former tsarist officers - it will, they say. you a new Russia based on federalism, but Ukraine and Skoropadsky should shape it ...
  5. 0
    25 December 2022 12: 51
    Very interesting and cool I read it and I liked it!
  6. +2
    25 December 2022 14: 24
    The Germans did not carry Rada in the convoy, because she had been sitting in Kyiv since February and whom Skoropadsky and the Germans dispersed. And she didn’t particularly want to fight against the Germans, because they counted on their help.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"