A batch of modernized T-90M "Proryv" tanks entered service with the "Brave" group in the NVO zone

37
A batch of modernized T-90M "Proryv" tanks entered service with the "Brave" group in the NVO zone

The Russian Ministry of Defense continues to saturate units in the NVO zone with new armored vehicles and weapons, introducing reserves. As reported in the military department, a batch of modernized tanks The T-90M "Breakthrough" entered service with the tank unit of the Central Military District, performing combat missions as part of a special operation.

A batch of modernized T-90M tanks arrived in the NVO zone, the vehicles entered service with the tankers of the Brave group. At present, the crews are testing out new armored vehicles, firing in the rear areas of the special operation. Classes are taught by military instructors with combat experience. In the near future, the tanks will go to the front line of one of the main directions.



Tankers who took part in the battles on T-90M tanks speak positively about this vehicle. As the commander of one of the tank platoons stated, if "the T-72 is like a trouble-free Kalashnikov assault rifle, then the T-90M is generally an airplane."

The T-90M tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with an increase in combat and operational characteristics. During the modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm cannon of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. The turret is equipped with a 12,7 mm remote-controlled machine gun mount. The new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.

The T-90M did not take part in the hostilities at the first stages of the SVO, the main vehicle of the tankers was the T-72B3. However, already in the summer there were first reports of the appearance of modernized T-90M tanks on the line of contact.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    37 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      20 December 2022 11: 34
      Very good cars! just to use it correctly in battle
      I hope the tankers will like the novelty and will not let them down in battle
      1. +22
        20 December 2022 11: 43
        It seems that we have begun to prepare for the appearance of more serious enemy armored vehicles on the fronts of the Northern Military District.

        The incomprehensible careful attitude of our leadership to the railway and road bridges in the west of the former territory of the Ukrainian SSR gives the enemy a stable and significant help in supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine with everything necessary on the front line.
        Why do we protect the enemy's supply routes remains an unpleasant mystery for the citizens of Russia, and not only Russia. soldier
        1. +3
          20 December 2022 12: 00

          Tankers who took part in the battles on T-90M tanks speak positively about this vehicle.
          but the Nazis do not like them, they complain that they are killing them.
        2. +3
          20 December 2022 12: 06
          Quote: credo
          The incomprehensible careful attitude of our leadership to the railway and road bridges in the west of the former territory of the Ukrainian SSR gives the enemy a stable and significant help in supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine with everything necessary on the front line.

          Okay. How do you propose to destroy them?
          1. +1
            20 December 2022 12: 59
            Quote: svp67
            Quote: credo
            The incomprehensible careful attitude of our leadership to the railway and road bridges in the west of the former territory of the Ukrainian SSR gives the enemy a stable and significant help in supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine with everything necessary on the front line.

            Okay. How do you propose to destroy them?

            Well, for example, the one that destroyed the underground storage near Lviv.
            1. 0
              20 December 2022 13: 34
              Quote: credo
              Well, for example, the one that destroyed the underground storage near Lviv.

              We haven’t hit bridges with this yet ... but we’ve tried the rest more than once ... and there is no particular effect.
          2. +1
            20 December 2022 13: 10
            The spoon is good for dinner.
            Bridges, as well as a complete blackout, as well as attacks on the command post, in my opinion, must be carried out before the start of a strategic offensive.
            1. +3
              20 December 2022 16: 29
              This is true. But, if they didn’t do it right away, let them do it at least now! As they said on TV, if I'm not mistaken, there are only 9 main bridges and tunnels. Because CBO is not finished yet and deliveries from there are still coming!
              Another such question. If NATO military transport planes with weapons land somewhere in Kyiv, and if there is something to reach, then is it really impossible to shoot them down on approach to airfields? After all, on the territory of Ukraine, enemy military equipment is a legitimate target.
              1. +1
                20 December 2022 19: 06
                . If NATO military transport planes with weapons land somewhere in Kyiv, and if there is something to reach, then is it really impossible to shoot them down on approach to airfields?

                They land in Poland.
          3. +3
            20 December 2022 20: 32
            Why don't we have people - frogs, surface and underwater fireships, outdated ballistic missiles with an enhanced non-nuclear charge?
        3. -1
          20 December 2022 12: 12
          Quote: credo
          Why do we protect enemy supply lines

          For the prospect of depleting the stocks of the enemy, that is, NATO. Destroyed when the time is right.
          1. +8
            20 December 2022 13: 05
            Quote: SKVichyakow
            Quote: credo
            Why do we protect enemy supply lines

            For the prospect of depleting the stocks of the enemy, that is, NATO. Destroyed when the time is right.

            The argument is so-so and is not supported by any real arguments and figures confirming the depletion of stocks in NATO countries and the lack of a military-industrial complex capable of resuming the mass production of ammunition and weapons.

            Only according to the latest domestic reports, over the past few days, the territories of the Kursk, Bryansk and Belgorod regions, as well as all four newly returned regions of the former Ukrainian SSR, have been shelled, and the Western patrons of the Kyiv junta are not even going to reduce the volume of arms supplies to Kyiv.
            1. -1
              20 December 2022 13: 26
              Quote: credo
              The argument is so-so and is not supported by any real arguments and figures,

              Shelling is being carried out, three pieces per settlement, before there were more. Apparently there is more or less to the MLRS Grad. They don't regret.
        4. -1
          20 December 2022 12: 15
          Looks like a poisoned bait trap.
      2. +1
        20 December 2022 23: 59
        And if only the tankers themselves did not let her down, shamelessly leaving the enemy ...
    2. +3
      20 December 2022 11: 37
      It is not clear whether these machines have KAZ Afghan kits? all the same, it’s not the Indians who are fighting against these machines ((((these ATGMs and other grenade launchers there are dark darkness
      and even more so, the enemies will probably try to knock it out and capture these cars
      1. +3
        20 December 2022 12: 01
        Quote: Erasyl

        and even more so, the enemies will probably try to knock it out and capture these cars

        Already captured...
        https://t.me/milinfolive/94606?single
      2. +3
        20 December 2022 12: 05
        There is no KAZ there. In general, they try not to supply everything new there. Reinsurance
    3. -1
      20 December 2022 11: 40
      I think that from the T-14 in the future they will put everything on them and there will be a tank we need.
      1. +1
        20 December 2022 11: 43
        The T-14 was more of a demonstrator of tank ideas and technologies ... and so far, they haven’t particularly announced its testing in the NVO zone
      2. +1
        20 December 2022 12: 08
        a modernized Arena is being installed on the T-90m
    4. 0
      20 December 2022 11: 40
      As I assumed, at first junk is used, and now fresh cars. I do not envy Ukrvermacht)) Work brothers!
      1. +4
        20 December 2022 11: 55
        They said so about China and the T-55 somewhere ... that they say they will be let forward in order to use up the enemy's anti-tank systems more ... then newer tanks will be launched
      2. 0
        20 December 2022 12: 39
        These vehicles have been there for a long time and wow, they have already knocked out and captured Ukrainian troops.
        1. +2
          20 December 2022 13: 17
          In vain they are called Ukrainian troops, and you and the Moscow Region, these are Nazi slickers.
          1. +4
            20 December 2022 13: 35
            They can be anything you like, only they will not stop being an army from this.
            1. 0
              20 December 2022 15: 20
              Quote: Kronos
              They can be anything you like, only they will not stop being an army from this.

              And svidozhidobandervoi too!
    5. +1
      20 December 2022 11: 46
      Such machines, if in experienced hands and with competent interaction, should finally show that Russia still has gunpowder in its powder flasks !!! One thing is interesting, is KAZ installed on them? If without KAZ, then sadness, the infantry’s funds are now heaps ...
    6. +7
      20 December 2022 11: 47
      Personally, I think all Russian tanks should be equipped with these KAZ systems
      Afghan by default on all tanks
      since the ends of the edge are not visible to the enemies of the Russian Federation, which means the survivability of each machine is very important for EVERY machine, I emphasize again.
      in conditions of not real sanctions, etc.
      it is better to try to save each tank from anti-tank missiles and grenades than to repair them for a long and expensive time or build from scratch
      I think many will agree with me
      afghanite is not cheap its cost of course
      but the mass production will still bring down the price, I think
      in short: how to run in, finalize, eliminate all possible sores of the joint and start up in a series
    7. +11
      20 December 2022 11: 49
      If only they would not be left under Lend-Lease, as in one once guards.
    8. +3
      20 December 2022 11: 56
      What does a party mean? In the army, these are platoons, companies, etc. In the civilian department, there are pieces .. So how many pieces are there in this party - parties of thieves and rogues ..? We have not forgotten how a dozen tanks were called an echelon ...
      1. 0
        20 December 2022 15: 26
        Quote: Igorash
        What does party mean?

        About two weeks ago, there was a message in the media about the dispatch of two hundred T-90-Ms. So consider... hi
    9. +2
      20 December 2022 12: 02
      As far as I remember, Russia is the only country where tanks are assembled on a production basis. That is, the production time and the price are significantly lower than those of a flock of comrades. And localization is close to one hundred percent. God bless.
    10. +3
      20 December 2022 12: 22
      Great news. More Russian tanks in the ranks - less Ukronazis in the ranks!
      Just don’t leave them again to the ukrovermacht ... with the “Capes” together ...
    11. +2
      20 December 2022 12: 38
      During modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M.


      Oh, this newspeak. It's cool...moduul. Or maybe just a welded tower from the T-90 instead of a cast T-72, in the old small tower it was difficult to place new observation and fire control devices, and a box in the back for additional ammunition. And so it is no different from the T-90 tower, only with the filling.
      And how they made a gun of increased survivability and accuracy, then the top secret from the Open - like good hunting rifles differ from consumer goods, they just learned to chrome the barrel.
      1. 0
        20 December 2022 21: 27
        In good hunting rifles - the trunks are not chrome-plated, mauvais ton. And they make them in pairs, absolutely identical in weight and butt, without sling swivels: for it is not the royal business to carry and reload them, for this a specially trained person is attached to the gun.
    12. +2
      20 December 2022 17: 28
      If only they didn’t give dill, but in general it’s surprising a huge amount of abandoned equipment inherited by the Armed Forces of Ukraine from ours, it’s time to introduce responsibility for leaving the entrusted equipment and property to the enemy, otherwise you won’t save any equipment at such a pace

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"