Named the consequences of yesterday's shelling of the Armed Forces of the Belgorod region

21
Named the consequences of yesterday's shelling of the Armed Forces of the Belgorod region

Unfortunately, in recent months, the data on the shelling of the Russian border territories have already managed to turn into something systematic and, what is the saddest thing, “ordinary”. Under the fire of the Ukrainian Nazis, not only the cities of Donbass, but also the territories of the Kursk, Bryansk, Belgorod regions. Periodically, the enemy makes attempts to shell the territories of the Crimean peninsula.

On the eve of the enemy struck another blow to the Belgorod region. Air defense calculations were included in the case. At the same time, unfortunately, it was not without casualties and destruction.

The acting mayor of Belgorod, Valentin Demidov, announced on the TG channel that after the shelling, the victims were bypassed. By the evening of yesterday, acts were drawn up, fixing the damage to two private houses and 60 apartments. More than 30 vehicles were also reported to have been damaged.

Valentin Demidov said that he took the restoration work under his personal control.

Meanwhile, at least one dead and several injured were reported as a result of yesterday's shelling of the Belgorod region by Ukrainian troops. An employee of a poultry farm in the Belgorod region died. As a result of the impact, one of the buildings of the agricultural enterprise was completely destroyed.



The governor of the region informs about a girl who was delivered to the clinic and received a shrapnel wound. She was wounded as a result of Ukrainian shelling of the village of Krasnye Yaruga. The gas pipeline and power lines were also damaged there.

Reporters note that as soon as the enemy is given a kind of pause, he uses it to shell Russian territories.
  • TG/Real Gladkov
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    December 19 2022
    The bastards hit civilian objects and are not shy.
    The UN and human rights activists, as always, are silent in a rag ... but what ... Russians are being killed ... that's different. am
    1. +2
      December 19 2022
      So we beat ourselves. It has been discussed for a long time and there is nothing to say. In turn, it is difficult for us to say that the dill are shelling themselves. In a word, we will say this: according to the military, it’s us, and if we hit civilians, then it’s them.
      1. 0
        December 19 2022
        There is a video where the air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine strikes at their residential buildings ... they are completely sick in the head there.
    2. +4
      December 19 2022
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      The bastards hit civilian objects and are not shy.
      The UN and human rights activists, as always, are silent in a rag ... but what ... Russians are being killed ... that's different. am

      The UN and false defenders are just divisions of the American Gestapo.
    3. +2
      December 19 2022
      This is what the silence of the lambs leads to in politics. If there were answers and a complete bombing of Kyiv (Bankovsky and comrades), and answers to everyone barking and bullying us, then this was hardly the case.
  2. +7
    December 19 2022
    "Reporters note that as soon as the enemy is given a kind of pause, he uses it to shell Russian territories." So no need to pause request ! One misunderstanding and emotions
  3. +10
    December 19 2022
    Unfortunately, it was not without casualties and destruction.
    Honestly, there is nothing to say, only questions.
    1. +3
      December 19 2022
      And what questions? Until we liberate at least the Kharkov, Sumy and Chernihiv regions, we will have to live with this. It is difficult to calculate nomadic installations
      1. 0
        December 19 2022
        Quote: dmi.pris
        And what questions? Until we liberate at least the Kharkiv, Sumy and Chernihiv regions, we will have to live with it

        then the shelling of these most liberated territories will begin.
  4. 0
    December 19 2022
    And it wouldn't be easier to ruin their pig farm together with the swineherds, or Caesar Napoleon there.
  5. 0
    December 19 2022
    And how do they get to the regional center? It seems that before they only reached the border villages.
    1. +1
      December 19 2022
      The Armed Forces of Ukraine have a small number of ballistic missiles: Tochka-U - 100 km and Thunder (a simplified copy of Iskander) - up to 500 km.
      In addition, they recently began a single production of kamikaze drones - up to 800-900 km
  6. +3
    December 19 2022
    I do not quite understand why we are so calm about such shelling. Not in terms of loud statements about attacks on decision-making centers, which are essentially empty chatter, but in terms of an immediate response to those who fired. It is difficult to understand where the APU is shooting from? I think it's calculated mathematically. Map, radius of means of destruction, possible points. As soon as the shelling begins, a flight of attack helicopters or attack aircraft takes off. Everything that moves where the fire came from is a target. What insurmountable difficulties are there for such a retaliatory strike? Is there an impenetrable air defense umbrella from the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine? So let the UAVs work, if the turntables are not able to pass. MLRS. OTRK.
    I just point-blank do not see retaliatory steps for the shelling of purely civilian infrastructure on our territory. Rocket strikes on the energy system of Ukraine are a necessary thing. But there is no concrete answer to specific shelling.
    1. -1
      December 19 2022
      What insurmountable difficulties are there for such a retaliatory strike?

      So insurmountable that aviation does not fly beyond the front line due to unsuppressed enemy air defense
      1. 0
        December 19 2022
        And what prevents us from suppressing it? We do not have a shortage of UAVs, there are also enough all kinds of radars. Detect with the help of drones that will cause fire on themselves, and work out. Then the air force strike, to consolidate the result. I don't see anything impossible.
      2. 0
        December 19 2022
        So Konashenkov broke it in the first week. Where did it come from? Or did the gentleman stick dirt on our ears? Which is not good on his part. And it’s even somehow shamelessly deceiving the Commander-in-Chief.
  7. +3
    December 19 2022
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    The bastards hit civilian objects and are not shy.
    The UN and human rights activists, as always, are silent in a rag ... but what ... Russians are being killed ... that's different. am

    Well, they are bad, we already know that. Only now they shoot a rabid dog, and we are all trying to "re-educate" it. Well, these "organizations" would be outraged, do you think something would change?
  8. 0
    December 19 2022
    So what kind of weapon was used to shell Belgorod? Somehow diligently avoid answering this question
  9. +1
    December 19 2022
    We moved away from Kyiv and what we wanted, we got
  10. +1
    December 19 2022
    Why don't we hit military targets in Kuev in retaliation? How much can you endure?
    1. 0
      December 19 2022
      Kueva is far away, more than 110 km from the border, you have to approach again

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"