American general: the United States does not seek an armed conflict with Russia, but they will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine

Brigadier General of the US Army Patrick Ryder held another briefing as an official of the US Department of Defense. Among other things, journalists were interested in the question of how the supply of weapons and military equipment to Ukraine may change in the near future. The question was also raised about whether the United States is considering the possibility (risk) of becoming a direct participant in an armed conflict with Russia.

According to the American general, the United States of America "is not at war with Russia and does not seek to do so."

Patrick Ryder:

We are not at war with Russia and do not seek such a conflict, but we will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine.

Echoing a thesis often exploited in the United States, Ryder stated that "supplies weapons Ukraine will go as long as it takes.” True, he did not specify what exactly would be required.

Meanwhile, in the United States itself, a commission is being formed that will “study” spending in the form of military assistance to Ukraine. It is planned that the commission will start working from the beginning of 2023, when the Republicans will officially occupy the majority of seats in the US House of Representatives after winning the elections. At the same time, the United States is not yet able to give an exact answer to exactly what amount has already been spent on military assistance to Kyiv. Various figures appear: from 18 billion to 37 billion dollars. However, no one can say for sure whether all these funds reached the Ukrainian army or not. This is what the members of the commission will have to find out, as they themselves claim.

Comments

[Argon]

Well, then you will receive an answer when you start the next "small, victorious" war somewhere on the planet. We will supply everything that we have in order to send more piindoos to rest

[Machito]

And what prevents you from making an answer yesterday or today? For example, in Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Brittany, Catalonia, etc.? What's stopping you? Gas? Oil? Foreign real estate elite?

[28st region]

About the answer. What do you think, just Putin's words when he said that

Russia may adopt the "works of American partners" on the tactics of a disarming strike

“The United States has a pre-emptive strike theory — one. Second, they are developing a disarming strike system. What it is? This is a strike with modern high-tech means, which should be delivered to control points, to deprive the enemy of these control systems, ”said the President of Russia.

In the Russian strategy, according to Putin, "a retaliatory strike is formulated."

[dmi.pris1]

We do not strive, but we will do everything to spoil ... Well, purely in the Amersian way. Let's not be hypocritical! Although the Amersian military is already there ...

[marchcat]

There is someone to fight for the Americans, they have all of Europe walking around in slaves. Well, to spoil - apparently at the gene level among staff members.

[Machito]

Quote: dmi.pris

We do not strive, but we will do everything to spoil ... Well, purely in the Amersian way. Let's not be hypocritical! Although the Amersian military is already there ...

Ihtamnet. Chimeras are fired by advanced Ukrainian users who are fluent in their native American language.

[Zoldat_A]

We are not at war with Russia and do not seek such a conflict

Quote: dmi.pris

We do not strive, but we will do everything to spoil ...

I do not understand.
When did America officially declare war on Germany in World War II? And when did Germany start sinking Lend-Lease ships with American equipment and raw materials for the USSR and with American, Canadian and other sailors?

Would it be worth recalling these two US dates today? Let the NATO Council be convened, compared ... They will think about who is participating in the war and how.

[Amateur]

The Americans have already done their job, forcing the eastern and western Russians to fight each other. Alas!

[Fangaro]

Damn this United States!!!
But why are their deputies going to check how the aid to Ukraine was used, whether someone stole it somewhere?
And our deputies are sure that all the money allocated by the state was used for its intended purpose and are not going to be checked?

[rotmistr60]

We are not at war with Russia and do not seek such a conflict, but we will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine.

Ukraine needs to prepare for the land.

[rocket757]

American general: the United States does not seek an armed conflict with Russia, but they will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine

A real assessment of what is happening and how it will / can happen next.

[Raccoon Raccoon]

As in that bike: either remove the cross, or put on underpants.

[Lis_Domino]

"We are not at war with Russia and do not seek such a conflict, but we will continue to supply weapons to Ukraine." - well, the task of Russian diplomacy is to explain to the Yankees that the supply of weapons is inevitable and will lead to conflict and not chew on senile snot and loudly shake the air. Is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs failing? Well then, the military needs to develop and carry out an operation - for example, sink a vehicle with weapons from the United States or something like that. But with us, wherever you throw it, everything is somehow amorphous, senilely impotent and rotten-contractual.