Russian journalist about the "cunning plan" of the President of the People's Republic of China and mass protests in China

In recent weeks, the world press has been actively covered news mass protests in China, allegedly caused by tough anti-COVID measures.

It is worth noting that the incidence rate in the Middle Kingdom, which was written about by both Chinese and European media (the latter greatly inflated it), really was a record since the coronavirus outbreak in 2019.

The starting point for mass protests was a fire in a high-rise building in the city of Urumqi, Xinjiang province, in which, according to official figures, 10 people were killed. The tragedy allegedly occurred due to the so-called "zero tolerance policy" that the Chinese authorities adhere to in the fight against covid. According to foreign media reports, doors were welded into the apartments of some residents. This is not confirmed in China.

However, a couple of weeks of protests have led the Chinese authorities to decide to ease the restrictions by lifting the quarantine in many cities, as well as allowing the population to independently conduct tests and decide on self-isolation.

In the foreign media, this step was immediately "christened" the weakness of the state apparatus. Allegedly, Xi Jinping "passed", fearing a coup d'état amid mass protests.

At the same time, Russian journalist Ilya Titov has a different opinion. According to him, what is considered “weakness” in the West is perceived in China as “a step of the authorities towards their people.”

Moreover, according to the expert, this was probably Xi's "cunning plan".

The thing is that the very “zero tolerance policy” that they decided to cancel cost China too much. The economic growth of the Celestial Empire not only stopped, but also began to “roll back”.

The Chinese authorities could not admit to their strategic mistake. At the same time, the lifting of restrictions “at the request of the people” looks like a beautiful gesture.

Titov noted that protests in China are usually extremely violent. However, this time they looked more like European ones. In addition, after the abolition of anti-covid restrictions, the incidence, in some miraculous way, began to decline by itself. All this indirectly confirms the artificial origin of the unrest that broke out in China.

Comments

[voice of reason]

Everything will work out if China manages to win a small victorious war. This will distract the people from internal problems, will make it possible to tighten the internal regime, not under the pretext of a boring covid, but as a martial law. And you can also send the most active to the army on the Pacific front. It's just that advanced experience is painfully difficult for the Chinese comrades to reach. But it's time, it's time to return Taiwan to its native harbor! how long can the antics of imperialist predators be tolerated? especially now they have weakened, tattered by a Russian bear ... come on, sleepy panda! get out already! we are on the mountain to all the bourgeoisie, we will inflate the world fire! (With)

[Revolver]

Even Senile Joe Taiwan will not surrender, and if he is replaced by a Republican, then even more so. But who China can capture is Mongolia. Russia, although a traditional ally and patron of Mongolia, may not fit in due to the hands tied by the already existing NWO, and the West, even if it wanted to, would not be able to, well, unless it would impose sanctions on China. The only thing that plays in favor of Mongolia is its complete uselessness to anyone. In addition to nomadic cattle breeding, there is nothing special to do there, and this business is not much more profitable than subsistence farming. Natural resources and places for resettlement - something that China lacks so much - there is not much pain there, in general, the game is not worth the candle.

[gsev]

Quote: Nagan

The only thing that plays in favor of Mongolia is its complete uselessness to anyone. In addition to nomadic cattle breeding, there is nothing special to do there, and this business is not much more profitable than subsistence farming. Natural resources and places for resettlement - something that China lacks so much - there is not much pain there, in general, the game is not worth the candle.

The area of ​​Mongolia is 1,5 million square kilometers, the area of ​​Ukraine is only 0,6 million square kilometers. Mineral resources in Ukraine are depleted, in Mongolia they have not really been explored. I think that analysts in the United States would prefer to transfer Ukraine to Russia and prevent Mongolia from passing to China than to allow Mongolia to pass to China if Ukraine wins the war against Russia. Mongolia in the current conditions is a convenient direction for the expansion of the PRC. If the Chinese leadership succeeds in integrating the Mongols into the Chinese world, then the PRC will open a window of expansion into Buryatia and Kalmykia. Sympathy for communism is strong among these peoples. If the Chinese leadership manages to reason with the manifestations of nationalism among the Han, then the expansion of the PRC to the north and northwest is also possible. The PRC will most likely enter the war in Ukraine, but not for the Russian Crimea and Donbass, but for the preservation of Russia as a counterweight to NATO and the United States. At one time, the United States treated lightly the possibility of participation in the Korean War of the PRC and the USSR. But the Chinese came to the DPRK when the United States seized 80% of the territory of this state and defended the independence of the DPRK. North Korea lost 1000 square kilometers. But she lost the mountains and acquired a flat sea coast convenient for agriculture.

[Nickelium]

Mongols and Mongolian-speaking peoples hate the Chinese. And as soon as China breaks all this dog pack, plus the Turks, Japanese and Indians will fall on China.

[gsev]

Quote: Nickelium

Turks, Japanese and Indians will attack China.

While China and Russia have allied relations, external enemies are too tough for them! India waged more bloody wars with the Muslims than with the Chinese, and it is stupid to get into an aggressive alliance with the Turkic, Muslim peoples. The Japanese in World War 2, when they captured Burma, staged an almost genocide of the Indians. Few countries in Asia have forgotten the atrocities of Japan and will decide on a military alliance with her. The Indians, having recently attacked the Chinese, having a 2-fold superiority (600 versus 300), could not inflict heavy injuries on the Chinese. This speaks of the excellent proficiency of the Chinese and the humanity of the Indians.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: gsev

While China and Russia have allied relations, external enemies are too tough for them!

China and Russia have the same allied relations as a cat with a sausage! China today is exactly the same imperialist as the United States, no softer.

[Alien From]

Boar! You hit the top ten! Nabolt, we didn’t fuck up with them without resources.

[alekseykabanets]

Good morning!

Quote: Alien From

the same allied relations as a cat with a sausage!

This is not my metaphor, this is LananShi, you must remember her, she always had caustic and well-aimed comments, it’s a pity I haven’t seen her for a long time.

[Alien From]

Kind! Of course, I remember Lanan Shi !, many people got off the site, and VO itself has changed a lot. But, time is inexorable, everything changes. All the best!

[gsev]

The PRC brought more benefits to Russia than other allies. During World War II, China held back 2% of all Japanese ground forces, preventing them from invading the Far East and Siberia. In 70-1950, China fought in Korea. In Vietnam, Chinese support was only 1953 times less than Soviet support and 2-2 times higher than the support of other socialist countries. The availability of alternative cheap products from China allowed Russia to jump out of the Western debt loop. It's just that Russia needs to coordinate its international policy with the interests of China. Sometimes in Vietnam, Kazakhstan and Myanmar, it does not weigh down the interests of the PRC. Many of the Chinese economic proposals rejected by Russia now would be very useful. At one time, the PRC proposed to close all pipelines to the east only to China and from 3 to create a full-fledged transport corridor PRC-Russia. Now that would be very useful. Simply the level of the economy determines the place of Russia and China in their relationship. Of course, the Chinese communists will always prioritize investing in the development of Chinese workers and not in Russian oligarchs. But without the support of the PRC, it would be problematic for Russia to withstand Western sanctions. And thanks to China, the termination of supplies of Siemens, Schneider and Delta Electronics simply reduced the cost of the necessary components by 2014-2 times.

[EDWARD]

China has nowhere to hurry. he will sit on the bank of the river. and wait.

[sagitovich]

Looking at the mistakes of Russia.
China will try to take back Taipei, peacefully, by the War Rejection Awareness Organization.
And We, ... blew the moment ...

[Bingo]

In Taiwan, Chinese people are not slaughtered for being Chinese. And then there would be no choice

[Chernorechye]

In Russia, brutalized capitalism and in China, capitalism with a human face. In China there is an ideology, but in Russia it is not from the word at all. In China, there is patriotism, and in Russia, a minimum number of the population has it. It's time for the state to turn its face to its people and not its ass. So many poor and unfortunate people in such rich Russia.

[Bingo]

There are also milk rivers, there is no corruption and corrupt officials either - this was especially noticeable at the last party congress
China has its own specifics, Russia has its own, and it’s certainly stupid to compare the two systems, because. they are mutually inapplicable. For example

80% of older Chinese do not have pensions

https://topwar.ru/3950-kitajskij-gigant-vnutrennie-problemy.html

[alekseykabanets]

Quote from Bingo

80% of older Chinese do not have pensions

Lying doesn't make a person better. I am not a fan of modern China, but for pensions https://rg.ru/2018/07/25/kak-ustroena-pensionnaia-sistema-v-sovremennom-kitae.html

[sailor roman]

In 1997, the State Council of the People's Republic of China decided to introduce a basic pension system. Today, men stop working at the age of 60, women - from 50 or 55, depending on the type of employment in production or in the office. Today it averages 600-700 yuan across the country (about 5600-6500 rubles), but in some places it already reaches 1200 yuan (11 rubles). Pension funds in China are formed at the regional level. The difference in the amount of pensions for residents of the conditionally prosperous Shanghai and the poor Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region can be eightfold. If we talk about the average ordinary - not "collective farm" - pension, then, according to calculations for 200, this is about 2018 yuan (2550 rubles).

[Monster_Fat]

"Capitalism with a human face in China"... Yeah. Tell the Chinese themselves about the "human face". Most here don't even have a close idea of ​​what life is like in China right now.

[Just a guest]

The USSR had an ideology. But the people didn't like her. The USSR collapsed, there was no ideology. But again it's bad.
On the ruins of the Union, only the lazy did not shout: Give me a market and I will buy only the best. I'll cut my throat for my rights. A little something wrong - immediately to the court.
Something the courts are still not overwhelmed with millions of lawsuits against housing and communal services and employers.
So only, in the kitchen, yes, at best, on the forum, under a bottle, they shouted that all the thieves brought the country ... And you ask - what exactly was stolen, and even more - how much did you take out from your own factory? - in the answer silence. There is nothing to say.
Yes, and in the end. Who's stopping you from doing business? Have millions and hundred-meter yachts? If anything, then the same Abramovich at one time was a foreman on a drilling rig. Luzhkov was a parking attendant, and Prokhorov was selling jeans - dumplings.

[Nikolay Malyugin]

Igor Golubev. The USSR collapsed not because of ideology. When the top becomes completely bureaucratized, then any system can not stand it. All people are different. One sells jeans, and the other sews them.

[Bingo]

About mass protests...

Detained as part of an investigation into a high-profile corruption case in which the European Parliament was involved, the former deputy head of the EP, Eva Kaili, could not be brought to court on Wednesday to choose a measure of restraint for her, RTBF reported.
This turned out to be due to the strike of the guards of the prison where Kylie is being held.

[Sniper]

China has passed the point of no return when it was a Tier XNUMX country.

[janeck]

China.. this is an unknown. How he behaves, time will tell. for now it's just speculation.

[Bayun]

As long as there is a Soviet fact: if billionaires appear in a country of communists, then power passes to the billionaires. I deeply dahushim whether the PRC will confirm this fact or not.

[nazgul-ishe]

You can talk and argue a lot about ACHIEVEMENTS. Look at the facts - AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, SPACE, ARMY, and much more - this is China. In addition to resources for any PAPER and at any price, little is produced in the Russian Federation. We'll see.

[Nickelium]

What are China's achievements? What world-famous auto brands in China do you know? Here I am, none. What about achievements in space? Have you already landed on Mars? What is the Chinese army? Already defeated the sparrows?
Where is there bastard Russia, which enriches uranium and builds nuclear power plants around the world. Or Novosibirsk scientists who have established the technology for the production of nanotubulene. And yes, they don't produce anything. But the promoted China produces everything, but what is unclear. But it is understandable when they say "Chinese quality" and "German quality" Maybe China should work on improving quality?

[nazgul-ishe]

Chinese brands of the auto industry are sold in the Russian Federation, but I haven’t heard about LADA in China. Own station with a crew, available and so on. We are not talking about bastard Russia with our quality and the developments of the USSR, but about the fact that the benefit obscured the MOTHERLAND.

[Nickelium]

Yes, I don't care that they are sold in Russia. The application is the whole world. And what about Lada? At one time Niva was quite successful. But I haven’t heard about Chinese auto junk at all.
What station? Where is this station? On Jupiter or Saturn?
Ha, as if it's not like that in China. It's the same there. There will be the same Gorbachev and the same Yeltsin. Just later than ours.

[bath]

Under our pressure, the Taiwanese usually turned.

The pro-Taiwan independence parties were completely crushed in every local election in Taiwan during this month. Already on the side of unification supporters who agree that China and Taiwan are one country, the dispute between the two sides is only about the political system, about the right to rule China. It is no longer a dispute between independence and reunification.

Strength is our backup, and it always has been. If an agreement cannot be reached, then it will not be possible to postpone it indefinitely. We have made this clear. The gray stage given over to Taiwanese politicians tiptoeing in a political ballet is getting smaller and smaller in square meters.

[decimalegio]

This intrigues me, what do you think would be the best government system for China???? A multi-party system like Taiwan, where you can choose different political and even practical proposals, or a one-party system like mainland China.

[bath]

We haven't found a better system in China, but we have definitely found the truth that people live in reality and not in consciousness propaganda.

Do ordinary people feel that they are making progress in society? Is there a better life?

At present, the Chinese Communist Party is satisfying the Chinese people.

[decimalegio]

I only asked your opinion, not the truth of faith, read by heart. However, I appreciate the idea that appears in the lines of your reasoning. If the Chinese Communist Party cannot meet the needs of the people, a revolution and another system will be created. And let it be clear to all the conspirators, this will not be the fault of the collective West, but only the will of the Chinese people.

[Vladimir Postnikov]

All this indirectly confirms the artificial origin of the unrest that broke out in China.

Hmm, I'm getting old. And with me my old logic grows old. I see the conclusion, but I don't see the premises. Three options are possible here: either the modern logic is different, or the logic is completely absent in this article, or my roof has gone crazy. Recognizing the latter is somehow uncomfortable for me. I refuse to believe in the first. So I'll stick with the second one.