Special Representative of the US State Department: the introduction of Serbian police into northern Kosovo is out of the question

16
Special Representative of the US State Department: the introduction of Serbian police into northern Kosovo is out of the question

Serbian troops


Serbia is commenting on the statement of the Special Representative of the State Department for the Western Balkans, Gabriel Escobar, regarding the situation in the north of Kosovo. Escobar said that Belgrade should not bring its police forces into the Serbian enclaves of Kosovo, despite the presence of UN Security Council Resolution 1244. The resolution suggests such a possibility in case Kosovo security forces appear in the Serbian enclaves. Kosovar security forces did show up there, but the US is now saying that bringing Serbian police into these areas is "out of the question."



On the basis of this resolution, Serbia has the right to deploy up to 1 of its police officers in the north of Kosovo, who would assist the KFOR contingent to protect law and order in the province. Escobar, who visited Pristina and held talks with Kosovo's "premier" Kurti, outlined the American position, saying that "in this situation, the introduction of Serbian police could destabilize the situation." That is, the “logic” is as follows: the appearance of the Kosovo security forces in the Serbian enclaves “does not destabilize” the situation, but the Serbian ones immediately “destabilize” ...

Commenting on a statement by a US State Department employee, Serbian Prime Minister Anna Brnabic said that Escobar is another politician who opposes the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions. Brnabic said that the special representative of the State Department "himself tried on the role of the Security Council, where unanimously - with one vote - annulled resolution 1244" on Kosovo and Metohija.

Anna Brnabic also noted that a destructive position on this issue was taken in Germany, as well as in the European Parliament, where they pretend that nothing happened.

Brnabic:

It turns out that other acts and resolutions of the international plan are not so obligatory for execution, are they? ..

According to the Prime Minister of Serbia, in order to "guess" the desire of the West to "strive for peace", all that remains is to follow the horoscope.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      14 December 2022 06: 18
      Well, what's so amazing about that? Kosovo is a project of Washington and THEREFORE they can do EVERYTHING, and the Serbs cannot defend themselves, they must politely bow and bend.
      1. -3
        14 December 2022 06: 26
        What is the project here? We don’t want to get involved in this, but we will have to ... if Vucic turns.. We can’t betray again ...
        1. +3
          14 December 2022 06: 31
          Quote: ser-pov
          We can't betray...
          we can ... we still lack one or two fronts for happiness ...
          1. +3
            14 December 2022 07: 09
            Quote: Aerodrome
            Quote: ser-pov
            We can't betray...
            we can ... we still lack one or two fronts for happiness ...

            In any case, they will arise if you do not work ahead of the curve .. isn’t it already clear ... It’s easier to stick your head in the sand.
        2. +3
          14 December 2022 06: 33
          ser-pov hihelp who?! Vucic? Excuse me, how did Serbia help Russia? By voting for an anti-Russian resolution? Notice they didn’t even abstain, but voted against Russia, oh yes, they are “poor” surrounded by NATO and all that, oh yes Vucic is not Orban. And how are you going to "harness" for the Serbs huh?
          1. -4
            14 December 2022 06: 59
            Quote: Murmur 55
            ser-pov hihelp who?! Vucic? Excuse me, how did Serbia help Russia? By voting for an anti-Russian resolution? Notice they didn’t even abstain, but voted against Russia, oh yes, they are “poor” surrounded by NATO and all that, oh yes Vucic is not Orban. And how are you going to "harness" for the Serbs huh?

            Are you whining again? Go hit the corner of the couch, unless it's soft...
        3. +2
          14 December 2022 09: 25
          Quote: ser-pov
          We can't betray...

          Betray? You can betray someone to whom you owe something. What do we owe Serbia? Do we have any friendly treaties providing for Russia's intervention in such situations? It is necessary to get involved only when it is in the interests of Russia. Seriously, once they already fit in with the Serbs so that in the end they ended up in the First World War. Need to be more careful.
          And how do you imagine helping Serbia? NATO countries are on all sides of it, you won’t even fly up, and you won’t drive up.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        14 December 2022 06: 27
        Sergey, here Russia cannot figure out which Serbs we can talk about, the Tribalts are already sneezing at Russia
        1. 0
          14 December 2022 07: 35
          Quote: Ryaruav
          Sergey, here Russia cannot figure out which Serbs we can talk about, the Tribalts are already sneezing at Russia

          You need to figure it out now, when cabbage is being eaten in your garden (this is figurative), otherwise it will be too late later .. So I don’t want an air raid alert in St. Petersburg to turn on ..
    3. +3
      14 December 2022 06: 25
      Belgrade should not introduce its police forces into the Serbian enclaves of Kosovo, despite the presence of UN Security Council Resolution 1244
      The desire of the United States to play with one goal and against the Serbs is well known. This also manifested itself in the US-led NATO bombing of Belgrade in 1999 and later in 2008 when the Americans forced their allies to recognize Kosovo. Therefore, today it is not surprising that the representative of the United States, spitting from above on the UN resolution, forbids the Serbs to act in the legal field and gives the "green light" to the Kosovo Albanians for the lawlessness they are doing.
      1. 0
        14 December 2022 06: 33
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Belgrade should not introduce its police forces into the Serbian enclaves of Kosovo, despite the presence of UN Security Council Resolution 1244
        The desire of the United States to play with one goal and against the Serbs is well known. This also manifested itself in the US-led NATO bombing of Belgrade in 1999 and later in 2008 when the Americans forced their allies to recognize Kosovo. Therefore, today it is not surprising that the representative of the United States, spitting from above on the UN resolution, forbids the Serbs to act in the legal field and gives the "green light" to the Kosovo Albanians for the lawlessness they are doing.

        What are we on?
        1. +5
          14 December 2022 06: 38
          Quote: ser-pov
          What are we on?

          How is that for what ... To sell Vucic gas and oil at a discount, to vote for Serbia in the UN Security Council and then Belgrade would not recognize the territorial integrity of Russia (with Crimea, Sevastopol and 4 other subjects) and for Serbian special representatives to vote "For" anti-Russian resolutions invented by the West ... Unfortunately, so far ...
          1. -3
            14 December 2022 07: 05
            Quote: Volodin
            Quote: ser-pov
            What are we on?

            How is that for what ... To sell Vucic gas and oil at a discount, to vote for Serbia in the UN Security Council and then Belgrade would not recognize the territorial integrity of Russia (with Crimea, Sevastopol and 4 other subjects) and for Serbian special representatives to vote "For" anti-Russian resolutions invented by the West ... Unfortunately, so far ...

            Vučić maneuvered as best he could ... he was already pinned down, only we could save him ... He has not applied yet ...
    4. 0
      14 December 2022 06: 42
      Anna Brnabic noted that a destructive position on this issue was taken in Germany, as well as in the European Parliament

      Strange ...
    5. 0
      14 December 2022 07: 16
      Put in yes, give it already well for the tinsel to this Biden Kirby and other blacks, and the projects of Ukraine, Kosovo, etc. will end on the same day
    6. 0
      15 December 2022 12: 54
      The Serbs went to this themselves .... Now no one asks them.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"