Military Review

Medvedev: Russia is increasing production of the most powerful weapons, including those based on new physical principles

205
Medvedev: Russia is increasing production of the most powerful weapons, including those based on new physical principles

Russia is increasing the production of the most powerful weapons, including those based on new physical principles, to counter the West, which supports Zelensky's Nazi regime. This was stated by Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev.


The Russian politician commented in his TG channel on the statement of the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Danilov that the enemies of Kyiv are from "the borders to Vladivostok." According to Medvedev, Russia's enemies have dug in all over the world, especially in North America, Europe and Japan. To counter Western countries that support the Nazis from Kyiv, Russia is increasing the production of weapons, including the latest, based on new physical principles.

It is much more difficult for us - our enemy has dug in not only in the Kyiv province of our native Little Russia. It's in Europe, North America, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and a host of other contemporary Nazi-sworn places. Therefore, we are increasing the production of the most powerful means of destruction. Including those based on new principles

- said Medvedev.

It is worth noting that the Russian military industry, which provides for the conduct of a special military operation, has significantly increased production volumes. Some enterprises producing military products switched to work in three shifts. It concerns the release of ammunition, tanks and armored vehicles, high-precision weapons, including missiles, as well as drones. At the same time, the Russian military-industrial complex does not need outside help to produce everything it needs. This is to the statements of Western countries that Russia allegedly receives military assistance from other countries, in particular Iran.

The Russian military-industrial complex is able to cope with any tasks, and we do not need anyone's help

- said Russia's permanent representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya at a meeting of the Security Council.
205 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Asad
    Asad 11 December 2022 09: 06
    +31
    Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 11 December 2022 09: 10
      -9
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оружие_на_новых_физических_принципах
      or here https://topwar.ru/183484-razvitie-otechestvennyh-vooruzhenij-na-novyh-fizicheskih-principah.html
      1. Ark Dst
        Ark Dst 11 December 2022 09: 15
        +1
        Noticed. Replace the drug dealer.
      2. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 11 December 2022 10: 14
        +11
        Quote: Gardamir
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оружие_на_новых_физических_принципах

        I always suspected the wiki of inadequacy, but not to the same extent
        Quote: Gardamir
        https://topwar.ru/183484-razvitie-otechestvennyh-vooruzhenij-na-novyh-fizicheskih-principah.html

        you'll forgive me, but even here there is not a single "new physical principle"
        1. Vladimir Postnikov
          Vladimir Postnikov 11 December 2022 11: 28
          +6
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          you'll forgive me, but even here there is not a single "new physical principle"

          But there is an old PR one, which is based on the postulate "The bigger the lie, the more willingly they will believe in it."
          While they live in the world ... live by deceit ...
        2. Andy_nsk
          Andy_nsk 11 December 2022 19: 36
          +3
          you'll forgive me, but even here there is not a single "new physical principle"

          Not "new physical principles" but "weapons based on new physical principles", i.e. on such physical principles that were not previously used in the creation of weapons. What I don't understand is how electromagnetic weapons differ from radio frequency weapons, or whether laser weapons are directed energy weapons (not to mention that they are all based on the use of different EMF ranges from a physics point of view). Well, all these physical principles have long been used in the creation of weapons. No way Dimon decided to fuck old Europe with tectonic weapons. What can you take from him - Asia-sir!
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 11 December 2022 20: 06
            0
            Quote from Andy_nsk
            were not previously used to create weapons

            mmmmm
            And what hasn't been used before?
            1. Andy_nsk
              Andy_nsk 11 December 2022 20: 17
              0
              And what hasn't been used before?

              Tectonic weapons... Damn! Babahnem - the whole world is in dust!
            2. Andy_nsk
              Andy_nsk 11 December 2022 21: 46
              +2
              I remembered an anecdote: an ensign conducts classes with soldiers who have graduated from the Physicotechnical Institute. Talk about new weapons.
              - The cannon shoots blocks of ice cooled down to minus 300 degrees. and freezes the enemy.
              - Comrade ensign, and scientists say that temperatures are below minus 273 degrees. it can not be.
              - This is our secret weapon, scientists cannot know about it!
        3. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 17: 51
          -2
          "...
          you'll forgive me, but even here there is not a single "new physical principle"
          ..."
          - once again - they wrote to you about WEAPONS "based on new physical principles."
          That is, "physical principles" - they are "new" - FOR WEAPONS, and not at all for "physical science".
          - well, think about it, Ms. dada, dear, and not tokomo thoughtlessly "trample Claudia."
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 15 December 2022 18: 13
            0
            I don’t know why you are trampling some Claudia, but name at least one new physical principle for weapons
      3. Sergey3
        Sergey3 11 December 2022 10: 52
        +4
        Hang your ears wider, lasers, phasers and other useless garbage have been known for a hundred years, so my opinion is that new physical principles are something that is not in a physics textbook, so it's useless to ask, a very limited circle of people knows this .
        1. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 17: 58
          -2
          "...
          Hang your ears wider, lasers, phasers and other useless garbage have been known for a hundred years
          ..."
          - "lasers and phasers" - invented in the 50s - 60s of the last century.
          And therefore they cannot be "hundreds of years" in any way 8-))
          - learn the materiel, dear ... from the circle of "limited persons" ... 8-)))
          .
          And about "useless garbage" - so read "grandfather Krylov" - his immortal "Monkey and Glasses".
          - as there...

          The monkey is weak with old eyes;
          And at people she heard,
          That this evil is not yet so big a hand:
          Only it is necessary to get Glasses.
          She took out the half-dozen glasses with herself;
          Twirls Points and syak:
          Then to temyu they will be pressed, then they will be pinched on the tail,
          Then they sniff them, then water them;
          Points do not work in any way.
          "Pah the abyss!" she says: "and the one
          Who listens to all the people of the vrat:
          All about points only I lied;
          And there is no use for a hair in them.
          The monkey here with vexation and with sadness
          About the stone so they were enough,
          That only the splashes sparkled.
          Unfortunately, it happens with people:
          No matter how useful a thing is, without knowing its price,
          The ignoramus about her tends to worse all her sense;
          And if the ignorant know better,
          So he also drives her.
      4. Mikhalych
        Mikhalych 11 December 2022 11: 06
        +4
        Is the laser a new physical principle??? Bullshit.
        Who exactly invented the laser? This was done by the physicist Theodor Meiman. Its development dates back to 1960. At the same time, laser technology began to emerge 5 years earlier. So, in 1955, researchers from the USSR Basov and Prokhorov came up with a quantum generator that amplified microwaves by induced radiation. The functions of the active medium were performed by ammonia.
        Based on this development, US scientists Shavlov and Towns began to create the principles of laser technology. In 1958, Prokhorov used a Fabry-Perot resonator to create a laser. It includes 2 parallel mirrors. And one of them was translucent.
        https://history-doc.ru/texnologii/kto-izobrel-lazer/
        hi
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock 11 December 2022 13: 34
          +4
          Quote: Mikhalych
          Is the laser a new physical principle??? Bullshit.

          Not new to science, but new to the army.
        2. Johnson Smithson
          Johnson Smithson 11 December 2022 18: 10
          0
          Is the laser a new physical principle??? Bullshit.

          It's an idiom and shouldn't be taken literally.

          the principle of operation (for example, damaging factors) of which are based on natural phenomena and physical processes that were not previously used in military affairs
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 18: 17
          0
          Mikhalych, yes, as I see it, you are a Writer, not a Reader ...
          - but you still READ what you write. Well, at least TRY...
          "...
          Who exactly invented the laser? This was done by the physicist Theodor Meiman. Its development dates back to 1960.
          ..."
          - remember?
          Now - read on
          "...
          In 1958, Prokhorov used a Fabry-Perot resonator to create a laser. It includes 2 parallel mirrors. And one of them was translucent.
          ..."
          - remember?
          ...
          Total:
          Prokhorov MADE A LASER "in 1958",
          But I DEVELOPED (!) LASER (it turns out) "physicist Theodore Meiman", the development of which dates back ... attention ... 1960.
          .
          those. "physicist Theodore Meiman" INVENTED a laser - just TWO YEARS after
          as also a physicist (what a strange coincidence! 8-), but only SOVIET ...
          the physicist PROKHOROV - not only INVENTED, but already PRACTICALLY (!) MANUFACTURED this very "laser", which in just TWO years later - was, it turns out, INVENTED by the American Theodor Meiman ...
          8-)))
          - Well, dddduuuuumum-Ms. dada, and not thoughtlessly "trample Claudia."
          What, is THIS BOSH written on the wiki? - Yes?
          So on the fence, too, a lot of things have been written.
          And behind the fence, it turns out - ordinary firewood.
    2. Qas
      Qas 11 December 2022 09: 10
      +15
      Well, these are those that have not yet been discovered and are unknown to anyone.
      Variety of "unparalleled in the world"
      1. Igor_Lvovich
        Igor_Lvovich 11 December 2022 21: 05
        +3
        Are you crazy about the technical knowledge of a lawyer to analyze? Don't you remember how he solved so many problems by renaming the police to the police? What about time zones? Labor productivity? A gift from Svalbard and the sea shelf? Stop already.
    3. dmi.pris1
      dmi.pris1 11 December 2022 09: 13
      +12
      Not only DAM talks about them, but they are already lazy ... Annihilation, it seems ... belay But in fact, he means lasers. Why he ranked it among the "new", the devil knows .. Well, since they created it, let's zhakhemm on some kind of satellite that transmits intelligence. This has already been threatened.
      1. Sergey3
        Sergey3 11 December 2022 10: 55
        +8
        Actually, the State Duma even adopted laws on this topic, so these are definitely not cartoons. And Merkel really offended Putin with her recent chatter, so we stock up on popcorn and wait for the cartoons to turn on in real life.
    4. Ark Dst
      Ark Dst 11 December 2022 09: 14
      +10
      Physical principles are used that were not previously used due to the complexity of the technical implementation. For example, detonation combustion.
      1. KCA
        KCA 11 December 2022 09: 27
        +7
        Detonation combustion has been used in internal combustion engines for a long time, ZIL-130 and GAZ-53 were famous for this, you sit quietly for yourself, pretend that you are doing your homework, all of a sudden it smells, you even learned to distinguish it from the release of air from pneumatics, from more often boomed, but quieter
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 18: 39
          0
          "... Detonation combustion has been used in internal combustion engines for a long time, ZIL-130 and GAZ-53 were famous for this, you sit quietly for yourself, pretend that you are doing your homework, all of a sudden it smells, you even learned to distinguish it from releasing air from pneumatics, from more often bumbling, but quiet
          ..."
          - dear, if at one time you would DO THE LESSONS, and not FAIL that you are doing them ...
          then you could find out that what "boomed and bumkalo" under your windows in "ZIL-130 and GAZ-53" - to DETONATING COMBUSTION - had NOTHING to do with it.
          - in the hot mufflers "ZIL-130 and GAZ-53" - "bahala and bumkala" - a gasoline-air mixture, which (due to the lack of a spark) - did not burn out in the cylinders of the internal combustion engine of the car, but was thrown into the muffler, where it is relatively "quiet" ( i.e. with a SUBSONIC speed of the flame propagation front) IGNITED from the hot parts of the muffler - while producing "booms and bums".
          - and "detonation combustion" occurs - when the combustion front propagates FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF SOUND - i.e. faster than the average velocity of the molecules of the burning substance. At the same time, the molecules of the combustion products "do not have time to scatter" - and develop a HUGE pressure that no metal can withstand.
          - and if the gasoline-air mixture that filled the muffler "ZIL-130 and GAZ-53" - would not "quietly" ignite, but would really detonate - then the world would be deprived of not only the muffler of this car, but, perhaps, this car itself too... And the bang would be such that your whole house would have to put in new window panes.

          - learn the materiel, dear ...
          1. KCA
            KCA 16 December 2022 06: 00
            0
            The pulsating air-jet engine V-1 was developed almost a hundred years ago, nothing, it flew itself, almost did not explode, it is based precisely on the detonation of a mixture of oxidizer and fuel, and not a burnt mixture in a zilka will scatter it directly into spare parts? nurse
    5. populist
      populist 11 December 2022 09: 17
      +12
      Again about prodigies ... What else to expect from an iPhone lover.
      1. alekseykabanets
        alekseykabanets 11 December 2022 09: 42
        +3
        Quote: populist
        What else to expect from an iPhone lover.

        "There is no money, but you stay there."))))
      2. TIR
        TIR 11 December 2022 10: 52
        +4
        This is St. Demetrius the Enforcer. Most revered in Georgia. In 2008, a miracle happened and St. Dmitry descended to our sinful land and gave teachings to the light for the fallen Georgian flock. Since then, St. Dmitry the Enforcer in the Georgian Orthodox Church has been on a par with the entire pantheon of the apostles. Therefore, in Georgia they call him Saint Dmitry the Enforcer of Rovno-Apostol
      3. mitrich
        mitrich 11 December 2022 13: 34
        0
        Yes, the photo still drives me into a stupor, as the head of the country, even a fake one, with undisguised amazement and delight of a savage, from a tribe forgotten by all the gods, in the ass of the world, looks at a smartphone donated by white Sahibs.
        A disgrace.
        Now he decided to compensate with formidable and belligerent statements. Funny and disgusting.
    6. Sniper
      Sniper 11 December 2022 09: 29
      +15
      It's time to start applying .. these new "physical principles". Around the perimeter, where there are threats to us.
      1. Alf
        Alf 11 December 2022 21: 57
        0
        Quote: Sniper
        Around the perimeter, where there are threats to us.

        The main threat to the country is in the Kremlin....
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 18: 43
          0
          "... The main threat to the country is in the Kremlin....
          ..."
          - the main threat - it is in your head, dear "Alf".
          And although this “threat” of yours doesn’t care deeply for the “country”, you personally can suffer from this “threat” ...
          8-))
          1. The comment was deleted.
    7. Nikolay310
      Nikolay310 11 December 2022 09: 31
      +6
      this is the same person who said, about let them just try in the Crimea ??? Well, everyone has already seen how worthless the price of his words ... unfortunately
      1. dmi.pris1
        dmi.pris1 11 December 2022 10: 41
        +1
        That's it .. Now he can say anything, even about the landing of reptilians hired by Wagner PMC. Only he no longer has faith
        1. Sergey3
          Sergey3 15 December 2022 18: 14
          +1
          Reptilians landed in Washington a long time ago wassat , so you picked the wrong example! laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 18: 48
          0
          "...
          Faith only he no longer has
          ..."
          - don't believe it!
          It took a lot of convincing...
          8-))
      2. stankow
        stankow 11 December 2022 14: 48
        +1
        Well, Russia adequately answered for the Crimean bridge. And immediately, and very disproportionately.
    8. Yorgven
      Yorgven 11 December 2022 09: 43
      +11
      This is a new term for charlatans ... Previously, there were "Field of Miracles", then - "New Vasyuki", now - "new physical principles".
      1. skeptick2
        skeptick2 11 December 2022 10: 30
        +7
        Weapons based on "new physical principles" are wonderful. It's so inspiring.
        But maybe first you need to master and increase the production of weapons based on old physical principles?
        In order not to be dishonored and not to beg for missiles and drones from Iran?
        1. mitrich
          mitrich 11 December 2022 13: 39
          +4
          You didn’t understand, UAVs made by the Persians from a ram and sticks on a massive scale, and not available to our military-industrial complex, are products for us based on new physical principles (NPF).
          For making them our industry is akin to mastering prodigies at the NPF.
          1. stankow
            stankow 11 December 2022 14: 50
            -2
            UAVs supplied by Iran are a worthy payment for the supply of the SU-30. Don't pay with dollars or oil!
          2. AdAstra
            AdAstra 11 December 2022 15: 55
            0
            Ahahahahahaha good "" "" "
      2. tikhonov66
        tikhonov66 15 December 2022 18: 49
        0
        "... This is a new term for charlatans ... Previously, there were "Field of Miracles", then - "New Vasyuki", now - "new physical principles."
        ..."
        - uh .... you missed the "cartoons" here ....
        8-)))
    9. Denis812
      Denis812 11 December 2022 09: 50
      +3
      New ones are those that allow you to earn political points without doing anything.
      For example, one could say that laser weapons are "new physical principles".
      And then take a picture next to "Peresvet".
      And now you're at the top of Twitter.

      Medvedev is such a Medvedev... :)
      1. fa2998
        fa2998 11 December 2022 10: 26
        +5
        Quote: Denis812
        And then take a picture next to "Peresvet".

        Quote: Denis812
        And then take a picture next to "Peresvet".

        For 50 years now, our (and overseas) scientists have been leading the authorities by the nose with lasers. Here's a little more, give funding! Goes for decades! Physics must be taught. The laser cuts (destroys) the object IN FOCUS. The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters from the device.
        You can blind or "illuminate" the target, but not destroy hi
        1. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 11 December 2022 10: 44
          +7
          The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters away from the machine.
          The focus will be where the optical focusing system directs it, even tens of kilometers away. However, no one has yet been able to cancel the absorption in the atmosphere, so the wild dependence of laser weapons on weather conditions nullifies all this. And you wrote well about physics.
          1. fa2998
            fa2998 11 December 2022 11: 15
            +2
            Quote: Aviator_
            optical focusing system,

            It all depends on the diameter of the system, and I didn’t “climb” about absorption, although I know. It doesn’t even depend on “weather conditions” - dust and water vapor in the air. The laser works better in a vacuum.
        2. Vasia
          Vasia 11 December 2022 10: 45
          +4
          Quote: fa2998
          Physics must be taught. The laser cuts (destroys) the object IN FOCUS. The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters from the device.

          Wow request You are definitely mistaken - smoking a physics textbook is definitely not a process of studying it.
          1. fa2998
            fa2998 11 December 2022 11: 19
            0
            Yes, and those who "earned" doctoral titles, who "pumped out of the treasury of the USSR, Russia, the USA and other countries, and for 50 years have not issued weapons" to the mountain - yes, scientists !!! laughing laughing hi hi
            1. Vasia
              Vasia 11 December 2022 11: 29
              +1
              Quote: fa2998
              Yes, and those who "earned" doctoral titles, who "pumped out of the treasury of the USSR, Russia, the USA and other countries, and for 50 years have not issued weapons" to the mountain - yes, scientists !!!

              I'm not talking about this, there are problems, but they are not connected"The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters away from the machine."
              Perhaps you expressed your thought poorly. hi
            2. stankow
              stankow 11 December 2022 14: 54
              +2
              I didn’t learn how to hit the laser, but to direct, measure, target, lead - without it, there’s no way in the war! No, the lards for research have not disappeared.
        3. Denis812
          Denis812 11 December 2022 10: 55
          +1
          What a news. Yes, already in the science-pop series they show how a laser destroys a target in tens of meters. conventional laser.
          And you have physics began to be against? :)))
          1. Shkworen
            Shkworen 11 December 2022 11: 03
            +4
            the laser fits well into known physics, there is nothing new here :)

            and in my understanding, weapons based on new physical principles are based either on the physics that has not yet been discovered, or due to violation of the laws of physics, which is possible in principle if you know how to break them :)
            1. Denis812
              Denis812 11 December 2022 12: 07
              +2
              How can you create a weapon in physics that has not yet been discovered?
              Don't you think that the very design and creation of such weapons is a fact of the discovery of this very principle? :)
              1. Shkworen
                Shkworen 11 December 2022 13: 39
                +2
                not yet, but as soon as they open it, they will probably invent ways to use it :)

                a couple of years ago, a scientific work was published on the possibility of extracting energy from the decay of quarks, the standard model itself allows the decay of heavy quarks into lighter ones, while the energy will be 10 times more than with thermonuclear fusion, but this technology is useless for weapons, with one caveat, so far useless, but who knows... a person is such a curious and active creature that if something can be used for a weapon, he will definitely use it if he sees a perspective in it, not now, but later :)

                for example, we still don’t really know the nature and physics of gravity, what Einstein described in GTR has been repeatedly tested and proven, but it was a very long time ago, and now we have much more advanced means of observation and measurement, as well as tools for analyzing and processing information who help us understand that we know very little about her. And this prevents us from building a theory of everything that would combine general relativity and quantum mechanics, and also, if we understand the physics of gravity itself, then in terms of weapons, gravity has a huge potential and it will just be a weapon based on new physical principles :)
            2. Mr. 9mm
              Mr. 9mm 12 December 2022 00: 57
              0
              Rules are meant to be bent!

              The comment is too short.
          2. fa2998
            fa2998 11 December 2022 11: 33
            +1
            Quote: Denis812
            What a news. Yes, already in the science-pop series they show how a laser destroys a target in tens of meters. conventional laser.
            And you have physics began to be against? :)))

            Physics FOR! You can follow the principle, they created devices of cyclopean size, worth billions, and achieve a result comparable to a shotgun. They tried to "pump" the laser with the energy of a nuclear explosion - you can go crazy in different ways. hi
            1. Shkworen
              Shkworen 11 December 2022 13: 44
              +1
              Yes, everything depends on energy ... we have come to such a threshold that for further progress we need more energy, the current volumes are no longer enough, therefore, work on the creation of controlled thermonuclear fusion has intensified, and the competition is already great, because whoever can be the first will slippers :)
        4. Former soldier
          Former soldier 11 December 2022 19: 52
          0
          The laser cuts (destroys) the object IN FOCUS. The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters away from the device.

          Wrong conclusion. In Komos, a laser beam can be of the same thickness and have a damaging effect at a very long distance because there is no scattering. In a clean atmosphere of the earth, it also gives a good result. But dust, water vapor, tobish clouds scatter the laser beam to almost 0.
        5. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 19: 04
          0
          "...
          You can blind or "illuminate" the target, but not destroy
          ..."
          - after all, he would have remained silent - he could have passed for SMART ...
          8-))
          https://mipt.ru/dppe/news/n_55q4cx?ysclid=lbp9mhhe3b430736685
          - and THIS is a development TWENTY YEARS AGO.
          And here is the Star Wars weapon. No, not those same Reagan fairy tales.
          When Reagan began to rave about his "star wars" - the USSR had already passed FIRE BENCH TESTS and was ready to be installed on a spacecraft - a COMBAT LASER with a continuous power of 100 Kilowatts. It was supposed to be delivered into orbit by the Energia-Buran combat complex. That is why, after the successful launch of Buran, the head of the US space program - said - that now the US will have to REQUEST PERMISSION from the USSR - for space flights.
          https://vrn.myatom.ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/03/10-3.jpg
          https://kbkha.ru/deyatel-nost/raketnye-dvigateli-ao-kbha/gazodinamicheskij-lazer-rd0600/?ysclid=lbp9wpp9rf950300355
          - learn MATCH.
          Our - Russian materiel.
          We have something to be proud of.
    10. smart ass
      smart ass 11 December 2022 10: 37
      +5
      Well, it's like uniforms in warehouses 1,5 million disappeared, because on new physical principles
      1. mitrich
        mitrich 11 December 2022 13: 44
        +1
        No, then the old physical principle, everything has already been stolen before us.
        Just trying to put on a new piece of gold.
        New, this is, well-forgotten old.
    11. Aviator_
      Aviator_ 11 December 2022 10: 39
      +4
      Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?
      Announce the entire list, please! (film "Operation Y", short story "Partner")
    12. Shkworen
      Shkworen 11 December 2022 10: 59
      +1
      I could not resist :)
      https://warhammer40k.fandom.com/ru/wiki/%D0%9E%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B5_%C2%AB%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%C2%BB

      but in general, it was always interesting what kind of prodigy this is :)
      1. tikhonov66
        tikhonov66 15 December 2022 19: 06
        0
        Hold on...
        This is a 20 year old development.
        https://mipt.ru/dppe/news/n_55q4cx?ysclid=lbp9mhhe3b430736685
        1. Keer
          Keer 15 December 2022 19: 25
          0
          My graduation project was "Measuring parameters of a powerful gas-dynamic CO2 laser"
    13. Keer
      Keer 11 December 2022 11: 46
      +1
      Longitudinal em waves, "torsion" fields, and other superlight and anti-gravity, presumably ... Or, maybe, just new cutting schemes were used. Who knows
      1. mitrich
        mitrich 11 December 2022 13: 49
        0
        Yes, the gain there is clearly not like from half a yard of sets from annihilating uniforms. Obviously orders of magnitude higher.
        Here, with such a scale, it’s not a sin for an iPhone to connect. With the miratorga, you can’t milk much more.
        1. tikhonov66
          tikhonov66 15 December 2022 19: 10
          0
          "...
          Or, maybe, simply, new cutting patterns were used. Who knows
          ..."
          - clear. at least one.
          YOU DO NOT KNOW.
          8-))
          .
          Tell me honestly - that's about THIS - did you know?
          https://mipt.ru/dppe/news/n_55q4cx?ysclid=lbp9mhhe3b430736685
          or about it
          https://vrn.myatom.ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/03/10-3.jpg

          meanwhile, these are NOT PROJECTS!
          These are REALLY WORKING designs ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
    14. Plate
      Plate 11 December 2022 12: 41
      +3
      Quote: ASAD
      Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?

      "New physical principles" are previously unknown physical principles request
      And "a weapon based on new physical principles" is a weapon that uses physical principles that were not previously used in military affairs, or were used extremely limitedly, as far as I understand. These principles themselves are not usually new. However, the name "weapons based on new physical principles" seems to be generally accepted.
    15. Vic111
      Vic111 11 December 2022 15: 02
      +2
      You see, these are the latest principles, so to speak, money disappears and an acoustic wave of limited duration appears, emitted by such physicists as D. Medvedev, D. Rogozin and other humanists.
      All other weapons operate according to the laws of fundamental physics.
    16. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 11 December 2022 19: 00
      +1
      You can give a hint ... For example, a "humanoid" monkey is used to, escaping from a predator, "fly" into a tree and from there "swear" and make faces! But one day the bough on which the monkey was sitting broke down and the monkey, having collapsed to the ground with the bough in its "hands", accidentally "made a pen" to the leopard! So the pithecanthropes got a club ... this is a "new physical principle" in contrast to the old one (make faces)! When the skinny Australopithecus, unsure of himself, putting the club aside, attached a stone to the picking stick to break the brain bones and received a spear, he used a "new physical principle" (!) ... the principle of "punching, pressure" was replaced by the principle " puncture "! That's how it went on and on and on and on! Behind the spear, a bow and arrows, then an arquebus and a musket ... a Winchester and a mosquito ... PPSh and AK-47 ... "Katyusha" and "Khimars" ... "Relight" and Teller's "X-ray" ... annihilator and disintegrator...
    17. Andrei Nikolaevich
      Andrei Nikolaevich 11 December 2022 19: 48
      -1
      I will gladly advise you. Although I am not an engineer, but a historian. This means, ,,complete decommunization,, of Ukraine. What was built by the Russian tsars and "damned commies" is to be destroyed. General Surovikin will plunge Ukraine into the time of the Pereslavl Rada, economically and energetically. With a bare bottom they came to the Russian tsars, with a bare bottom they will leave. In short, like this .. Historically .. I repeat: I am not an engineer, but a historian.
    18. Serafim
      Serafim 11 December 2022 22: 17
      -1
      Have you heard about the trigonometric homotropic destabilizer of time (space-time continuum)? Not? Me too!
    19. lopvlad
      lopvlad 12 December 2022 14: 39
      0
      Quote: ASAD
      what does "new physical principles" mean?


      and what is an invisible plane while it is visible to everyone from radar to people?
  2. Konstantin Shevchenko
    Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 09: 12
    +3
    The United States is a forced instrument of pressure. The real enemies are those to whom the Pope kisses the hands. They are dynasties and globalists.
    1. New-pechkin
      New-pechkin 11 December 2022 10: 23
      0
      The real enemies are those to whom the Pope kisses the hands. They are dynasties and globalists.
      And who is the Pope kissing hands laughing You still forgot Masons and reptilians.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Konstantin Shevchenko
        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 16: 28
        0
        Well, if for you the owners of the "green" printing press or private traders are members of the club, for example, one of the famous Bilderberg clubs - reptilian masons, so be it. Your version is interesting, you will be welcomed on Ren-TV.
        1. New-pechkin
          New-pechkin 12 December 2022 18: 24
          0
          About the Pope, I understand skip laughing you are so for the red word.
          owners of the printing press "green"
          And what has the Fed already bought? It went private with an owner with a non-removable board of directors and they don't have to report to anyone?? Who are appointed without the participation of the president and the approval of the Senate??? About Ren-TV, this is for you, it's not in my head a collection of myths, from the Pope to the FRS.
          1. Konstantin Shevchenko
            Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 18: 32
            0
            It became interesting, so which state owns the printing press if not private individuals? To whom do they report? And who is interested in the USA with 30 trillion dollars, from whom did they borrow money? Probably China and Russia). You probably confused the Fed with the IMF?
            1. New-pechkin
              New-pechkin 13 December 2022 15: 29
              0
              It became interesting, so which state owns the printing press if not private individuals?
              USA. You really do not understand that the leadership of the Fed is just officials appointed by the president and approved by the Senate (7 people). Or confuse it with the private part of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks (FRB) and their directors. Here's a primitive picture for you, no one prints private money.
              1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                Konstantin Shevchenko 13 December 2022 15: 58
                0
                Well mastered and peekaboo. It remains to find the owners of the FRB and solve the mystery of the trick with a double bottom. Many have already broken their heads, maybe you can do it, especially with faith in honesty and disinterestedness in all this. For that, they were convinced that the Fed is not a state, but only has representatives from the US state. There is an audit in the public domain, it can surprise you a lot. I agree that not all information can be trusted.
                Since the age of 91, they have been hanging noodles about the self-regulation of the market, but it turned out that there is an invisible hand)
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 11 December 2022 09: 22
    +16
    According to Medvedev, Russia's enemies have dug in all over the world, especially in North America, Europe and Japan.

    Well, yes, until February 24, North America, Europe and Japan skillfully disguised themselves as decent partners. 30 years old, promised to help.laughing And now, they began to rowdy, and, so to speak, to decompose morally. laughing
    1. Epaulettes
      Epaulettes 11 December 2022 09: 35
      -3
      Yeah, the enemies of Russia, who dream of destroying Russia, but all this time they have been supplying Russia with medicines and medical equipment, including high-tech ones. What vicious enemies.

      What does he carry...
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 11 December 2022 09: 38
        +13
        but all this time they supplied Russia with medicines and medical equipment
        And for the sake of these supplies and not only these, they destroyed their own. Everything, for the sake of enemies. smile
        1. Epaulettes
          Epaulettes 11 December 2022 09: 49
          0
          That's it. Who are his speeches about enemies intended for?
      2. Konstantin Shevchenko
        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 09: 49
        +9
        Did they supply for free? What kind people! And why does Medvedev dislike them so much?
        1. stelltok
          stelltok 11 December 2022 10: 02
          +8
          Did they supply for free?

          No. Delivered demanding a lot of money for it.
          1. Epaulettes
            Epaulettes 11 December 2022 10: 15
            0
            And now, all of a sudden, greedy capitalists, for whom money is the main meaning of life, suddenly decided to refuse Russia's money for some reason, imposing sanctions on, for example, microelectronics.

            Someone is clearly lying.
            1. stelltok
              stelltok 12 December 2022 09: 33
              0
              For some reason, Russia to refuse, imposing sanctions on, for example, microelectronics.

              They didn't refuse. There was news that Nokia wants to supply its products
              https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/08/11/2022/63690c1e9a7947eb558f01b3
              There were other news of a similar nature.
          2. fa2998
            fa2998 11 December 2022 12: 01
            -1
            Quote from stelltok
            Did they supply for free?

            No. Delivered demanding a lot of money for it.

            And who prevented us from doing it ourselves? Starting from the times of the USSR. That means everything is the best for the army, and the people "chased" for imports. Now they are to blame! I think you do not drive Moskvich-412.
            1. stelltok
              stelltok 12 December 2022 09: 36
              0
              And who prevented you from doing it yourself?

              What to do? Microelectronics level 10 nm?
              To make a closed economy and not depend on sanctions, at least 300-500 million people are needed.
              I think you do not drive Moskvich-412.

              And what is the Lada Vesta (without options) not suitable for? anything is better than nothing.
        2. Epaulettes
          Epaulettes 11 December 2022 10: 05
          +4
          And what, they are obliged to deliver free of charge? They don't even deliver anything for free within their own countries.

          Do you think we have a different way? Do defense factories supply their products to the troops for free? Or is there a contract with MO? BUT?
          1. Konstantin Shevchenko
            Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 10: 17
            +4
            They pushed through their business and the rarer the disease, the more expensive the medicines to cosmic prices. There are no enemies and friends here - this is business. If a person gets sick with a chronic disease, without the support of the state, it becomes a disease of the rich. Remember how they did not let our vaccine into their market.
            1. Epaulettes
              Epaulettes 11 December 2022 10: 33
              -4
              Now all foreign policy is based on economic relations between states. What kind of enemies is Medvedev talking about then?
              It turns out that the whole essence of the conflict comes down to the fact that the other side has something to offer Ukraine in terms of business and economy. And what can Russia offer Ukraine?
              1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 11: 01
                +4
                You famously jumped off the topic of mafia forms of medicine and medicine, in your post they are saints. I see since 1991 there is no desire to conduct international economic relations with Russia by the states listed by Medvedev, no matter how they play, no one tolerates competitors. They only want resources for their business, on their own terms. We were offered a colonial economic system, do you agree with such an international position (relations) I don't, Putin and Medvedev don't either.
                What am I talking about, to be clear. You can defeat theft and corruption with pretty brutal methods. But you will not defeat inflation, which they pour on us, the state is getting poorer, and the prices for treatment are not being fed even for the rich. And what about Ukraine?
                1. Epaulettes
                  Epaulettes 11 December 2022 11: 21
                  -2
                  Yes you?
                  If the persons voiced by you do not agree, then where are our completely domestic lithographs for creating microelectronics?
                  For 30 years, there was not enough time and resources to do it? Or is it about something else?
                  1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                    Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 11: 35
                    +4
                    Well, you yourself write international relations, they give us medicine, we give them resources and voila, why do it if you can buy it? And then you wonder why we don't do it?! With microelectronics, we failed back in the USSR, there is a detailed rather large article on VO. Naturally, we cannot catch up here, so we are looking for a different approach.
                    1. Epaulettes
                      Epaulettes 11 December 2022 11: 46
                      -2
                      Wonderful.
                      That is, as long as everyone around lives and enjoys the benefits of civilization, we will reinvent the wheel. In the conditions of war. Even without guarantees that it will turn out at least acceptable. And that in general at least somehow it will turn out.
                      And, remember, this is all for what you need?

                      And just don't try to accuse me of trying to sell myself for jeans and Coca-Cola right now, okay? Most recently, our Garant drove along the restored Kerch bridge not at all in a domestic-made car.
                      And the above-mentioned Medvedev constantly writes in social networks that are not built on Russian technologies.
                      1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 12: 42
                        +1
                        Who lives in good civilization? Are these people in the US in the south in tents? And affordable medicine for ordinary US citizens, waved a credit card and is healthy? But the US dollar goes from which the ruble is a derivative. Maybe Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland (which cannot exist without EU subsidies). In any state can be considered and see the colonial financial system. How many countries sell resources, but live in poverty. And consider how many Europeans live in the benefits of civilization? We do not have such slums in ordinary cities as they have in the capitals.
                        I constantly hear from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the President about equality in the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Defense, but such a day has never come. The West deceived Yanukovych, deceived with Minsk and you are waiting for decency in the Ministry of Energy. By the way, they are constantly changing the rules, for this it is enough to look at the history of the agreement with Gazprom.
                      2. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 11 December 2022 14: 34
                        0
                        We do not have such slums in ordinary cities as they have in the capitals.
                        Do you believe that yourself?
                      3. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 15: 22
                        +1
                        Why believe? It is easier to see the benefits of civilization. Tell me where can I see slums in Yekaterinburg, Yaroslavl, Novosibirsk, Samara worse than in the vicinity of Paris? Or a drug addict's mess like in the center of Berlin?
                      4. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 11 December 2022 15: 29
                        -4
                        drug addict mess like in the center of Berlin?
                        I have not seen a drug addict not only in Berlin, but also in Amsterdam. So there are no less drugs in Russia (as a percentage) than there.
                        are the slums worse than those around Paris?
                        When in Russia there will be benefits for poor refugees comparable to those in France, and you will have such. Moreover, they are cleared with enviable regularity, resettling the inhabitants, but new refugees come running.
                      5. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 16: 22
                        +3
                        Those. you admit that in Europe and the cities of the USA not everything is so cheerful and civilized. Thank God that we do not have that civilization, because even in Adler in winter it is not comfortable to live in a tent, and there is not enough space.
                      6. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 11 December 2022 22: 07
                        -2
                        even in Adler it is not comfortable to live in a tent in winter
                        Everything here is Namana with civilization yes and the homeless here are those who practically refused social assistance.
                      7. Andrei Nikolaevich
                        Andrei Nikolaevich 11 December 2022 19: 51
                        +2
                        Konstantin Shevchenko, almost the same thing my friend told me when he first visited London on a business trip. He said that it was cleaner at three stations in Yeltsin's time than now in the center of London.
                      8. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 11 December 2022 22: 05
                        -3
                        in our three stations during the Yeltsin era it was cleaner than now in the center of London.
                        This is probably why all the British who can afford it leave for Moscow laughing . They open a residence permit in Russia, buy housing, study at Moscow State University tongue .
                      9. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 09: 12
                        +1
                        I can't say about the British, in Russia they study from all over the world and even from Western Europe. Nobody guessed where. In the cities of Russia, roads are being repaired, parks and sidewalks are being updated, cleanliness and beauty. It was I who still did not get big trump cards St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kazan.
                      10. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 11: 42
                        0
                        And what are the trump cards in Moscow and Kazan? 1000 bucks pay at London prices? And besides Slavic specialists, who else is studying from Western Europe (except for Moldovans)? And how many people have been thrown out of trump cards in Tbilisi and Ulaanbaatar recently?
                      11. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 15: 17
                        0
                        Beautiful, restored, well-groomed cities with many parks put in order and clean. Well, for example, from Belgium infa 100%. Well, war is always bad. Not all people with a strong spirit, cut off, will return. Only idiots can enjoy war. Do you even know how much the population of Moscow is? Several 10 thousand Moscow will not notice.
                        Well, now you have a question, name the states in Europe that have electronic public services. Once they started talking about a civilization where you don’t have to run from one window to another through the whole city. How to pay non-cash using a phone in super super USA? And yes, and why do they have such an expensive Internet and connection?
                      12. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 15: 26
                        0
                        do they have such expensive internet and connection?
                        A couple of hours of work. In England, I pay for two phones - unlimited (with free devices - premium) and + unlimited online 5ji (not from a phone - a separate modem) I pay with one shift of work.
                        e-government services
                        The company was registered in England in an hour.
                        Several 10 thousand Moscow will not notice.
                        As in London, approx. 14 mil. The question is, why are only Tajbeks rushing to Moscow, and the Swedes and French go to London to live? not to mention the Russians.
                      13. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 15: 46
                        0
                        Well, not only Swedes, Russians go to London. There are also enough "Tajiks" and even more if they have the mayors of the city and the minister of "Tajiks". And there are many Putinites at the rally, postmen and nurses, and each time with different professions.
                        I have a feeling that you do not understand what electronic state. services. It is not fast or slow, but civilization.
                        And to add that there are often rallies in Europe for improving life and wages, and not among the "Tajiks" for a prosperous Europe, it is very strange and with such a social package.
                      14. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 15: 53
                        0
                        I get the feeling that you don't understand
                        That everything that is in Russia is also in the cities of Europe. And something that is here - in Russia will not appear soon. But this is understandable - here one pretzel explained to me in all seriousness that there is no sewerage system in London wassat .
                        I repeat the question - why do Tajbeks go to Moscow with its electronic public services to live, and the whole world goes to London?
                      15. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 16: 07
                        0
                        Russia's borders are tighter
                      16. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 16: 11
                        0
                        The point is most likely that Russia is not very attractive to the Swedes and the French; they, unlike the Tajbeks, have a choice.
                      17. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 16: 19
                        0
                        something often in Europe rallies for better living conditions and wages
                        Of course, it is better when even better (the wife of a friend-Medsestra receives almost 1000 per week) and, in addition, strong trade unions and the lack of probability of being beaten or thrown out into the street, the Black Maz-Zade will not be given your work.
                      18. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 17: 36
                        0
                        So I was not lucky, I wrote the text to your question, a line came. It'll have to be brief.
                        Russia has a stricter migration policy, geographic location, and climate. For migrants, the most important thing is the exchange rate, many send money home. Rich Russians are mostly swindlers who have fled from justice, faith in democracy, the prism of innocence, the protection of frequency property.
                        The Swedes and the French willingly go to Russia to work for a large amount of money, such as top managers. The rest is hindered by the exchange rate. The salary is understandably 4000 euros, but if it is enough, firstly, the tax must be deducted, and secondly, the services are expensive. those who serve your rich friend also want to receive 4000 euros. For Russia, this is a large amount, for Europe it is a beggarly amount. The economic war, it didn’t just appear between Russia and the “West” for a reason; everyone wants to live well at the expense of someone.
                        My question is, what is there in England that will not be in Russia soon? Intrigued.
                      19. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 17: 45
                        0
                        what is there in England that will not soon be in Russia?
                        Stability. I'll lose my job tomorrow and... nothing will happen to me. I will receive benefits and housing, and I will live almost as before. Enough? I can add such a trifle as the ability to travel to Paris or Amsterdam by train - less than 3 hours from the closing of the front door - and you are in Paris. Very good medicine - I was in the same hospital as Boris Johnson. In general, a lot of things. (you didn’t have a chance to visit, I suspect laughing ).
                        Russia has a stricter migration policy

                        You can't buy an English passport through contacts in the diaspora tongue .
                      20. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 19: 40
                        0
                        Lose your job and get a home? I'm glad for the British, but in the USA they were not lucky with this. In Russia, they don’t sit on their ass, but “Tajiks” work too, I think that this is right. I don’t understand what civilization is, for me it’s probably like LGBT propaganda. I don't understand why LGBT people should be promoted. And by the way, England left the EU, one of the reasons is migration. And do not blow into the ears of the Russians that in the EU, England, the United States there is no corruption, bribery. Before covid, Russians also traveled around the world. Silly comparison, someone has 3 hours to Amsterdam, and someone has a subway near their home. Mikhalkov's verse comes to mind. And someone can see the Red Square.
                      21. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 19: 47
                        0
                        someone has 3 hours to Amsterdam, and someone has a metro near their house
                        It's like that for me. 100 meters. LOROL, not the subway, but still.
                        in the EU, England, USA there is no corruption, bribery.
                        Try buy English driving license or American passport tongue
                        why promote LGBT.
                        You won't even believe it smile Nobody promotes LGBT people here.
                      22. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 20: 06
                        -1
                        Well done you guys for doing well. Passport and rights is not an indicator. Well, I understand that lobbying interests is not corruption.
                        But I don’t need to run anywhere, everything suits me in Russia from work to resorts, have you been to ski resorts in Russia? You will not regret coming, and the prices are cheap for you, you are from rich Europe.
                      23. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 20: 14
                        -1
                        and for you the prices are cheap
                        When visas and cards settle down, we will arrive. I will show my wife the Motherland - the Soviet Union.
                      24. alekseykabanets
                        alekseykabanets 12 December 2022 20: 31
                        +1
                        hi
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        When visas and cards settle down, we will arrive. I will show my wife the Motherland - the Soviet Union.

                        You can show anything, but not the Soviet Union.))) And the second question, when, in your opinion, will issues with visas and cards be settled?
                      25. Bolt cutter
                        Bolt cutter 12 December 2022 20: 42
                        0
                        anything but the Soviet Union.)))
                        My motherland. It's a pity that she ended her life. Half of the republics (visa-free) looked = Russia remained. In Russia, there is also a lot left of the Union. Ak when it all settles down, in six months from Victory. I hope your victory.
                      26. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 12: 52
                        -2
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        where then are our, completely domestic lithographs for the creation of microelectronics?

                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        That is, as long as everyone around lives and enjoys the benefits of civilization, we will reinvent the wheel. In the conditions of war. Even without guarantees that it will turn out at least acceptable. And that in general at least somehow it will turn out.

                        Some weird mood swing in... 25 minutes? Approximately so much time between your two comments.
                      27. Irokez
                        Irokez 11 December 2022 13: 27
                        +1
                        Quote: Plate
                        Some weird mood swing in... 25 minutes

                        Don't pay attention - this is either a TsEPSOshnik or a stupid super-patriot.
                      28. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 13: 39
                        -3
                        What are you talking about? What's another leap?
                        To sum up both of these comments, it was about the fact that it was necessary to develop together with everyone, while there were all the possibilities for this. Instead, we just went with the flow selling resources.

                        And now, having quarreled with everyone, it turns out that we are sitting with a bare ass, and we will try to give birth to something of our own, it’s not clear what.
                      29. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 14: 04
                        +4
                        If I was the head of the Fed or a member of the Bilbeder club. I heard that some president wants to change the financial system and not sell resources for a dollar. I would also vote to stuff Ukraine with weapons and nationalize and impose sanctions on the evil of the benefits of civilization. And he ordered the Ukrainians to attack the DPR on February 18, 2022. We did not quarrel with anyone and did not impose such sanctions on Magnitsky.
                      30. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 14: 10
                        0
                        And now Russia is selling resources for what? The same titan, for example. Or uranium for nuclear power plants?
                      31. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 14: 24
                        +2
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        Or uranium for nuclear power plants?

                        Nuclear fuel for nuclear power plants is a rather high-tech product.
                      32. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 14: 27
                        +1
                        Sell ​​this product for what, I ask you.
                      33. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 14: 49
                        +1
                        I suppose that this product, like all others, is sold for money.
                      34. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 15: 16
                        +2
                        Be specific. For money, which is the currency of which state?
                      35. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 15: 29
                        +2
                        Well, should I retell popular statistics to you? Well, if you don’t know, then the most popular currency in the world is the US dollar, followed by the euro. Most deals in them.
                      36. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 15: 34
                        0
                        There, in the dialogue above, it was said that one president wanted to break the global financial system and not trade resources for dollars. For which the Fed decided to punish him. From your conclusions, it turns out that the Fed has achieved its goal)))
                      37. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 15: 51
                        +1
                        Conclusions are the result of some kind of reasoning, logical operations. I gave you only the facts from the statistics without any processing.
                        I think the Fed doesn't care who trades what. Dollars or something. Over the past 20 years, the share of the dollar in world trade has been steadily declining, and no one got drunk, but here they just got drunk, well, well.
                        I think Russia is just trying to raise its status in the hierarchy of capitalist states. To have more mines abroad and more markets. And for this it goes through a conflict, including an armed one. And it will all be measured in dollars or in rubles, I believe, Russian capitalists do not care just as much as American ones. Their goal is to increase their own profits. Dollar, ruble, etc. - tools.
                      38. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 16: 13
                        -2
                        But who will allow Russia to do this? All markets have long been divided.
                        For every action of third players that is beneficial to Russia and disadvantageous to the West, these third players will receive secondary sanctions.
                        And in order to change this, you need to defeat the United States directly, and not Ukraine.
                      39. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 18: 14
                        +2
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        But who will allow Russia to do this?

                        And no one wants to allow it.
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        And in order to change this, you need to defeat the United States directly, and not Ukraine.

                        Ukraine as the first match will do just fine. And no, the US does not have to win. It is enough to explain and show them that securing an equal status for Russia will incur fewer losses than fighting it.
                      40. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 15: 34
                        0
                        Ukraine is not the first match. If you study the history of colonization by the Anglo-Saxons, then they always did it this way, they raked in the heat with the wrong hands. A typical situation, as 300 years ago. For their own purposes, they supply weapons to the "popuas" against their rivals.
                      41. Plate
                        Plate 11 December 2022 14: 17
                        +4
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        that it was necessary to develop together with everyone, while there were all the possibilities for this.

                        Well, now there are opportunities. A new round of technology - a new train is about to hit the road, we have every chance to get there. Including through the development of the latest military technologies.
                        Quote: Shoulder straps
                        And now, having quarreled with everyone, it turns out that we are sitting with a bare ass, and we will try to give birth to something of our own, it’s not clear what.

                        I suppose, at the dawn of the era of microelectronics, we decided not to try to "give birth to something of our own, it's not clear what." Well, how do you like the results? Yes, it's pointless to give birth to your own silicon processors and memory cards. But in those areas that are not yet widespread and developed, this needs to be done.
                      42. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 14: 33
                        0
                        We have been threatened by the threat of NATO since the early 2000s. Maybe longer, but I was still a child then, so I don’t remember.

                        Well, since this threat has been hanging over us for so long, from the point of view of our authorities, why haven't they developed alternative technologies for all these years? And if developed, then where can you see the result?
                      43. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 15: 02
                        +3
                        In the 90s, instead of tanks, we produced pots and these goods were given out as wages. When we set up the production of military equipment for sale, I remember how we boasted in our media. But do you think everyone in this world was happy? It was one of the bells and whistles. The crisis of 1998, we essentially did not have a gold reserve and a fund. What to develop. But we have some research institutes in the absence of funding and salaries did not give up in the 90s. After such a crisis, there was no opportunity to develop on a par with the West. Does the "West" need it, so that some state, having resources, would themselves produce bypassing the "West" chain? Of course not. You do not consider, but the "West" needs it? Only from your position.
                      44. Epaulettes
                        Epaulettes 11 December 2022 15: 15
                        0
                        And now, then what's the point? Do you think they will let us do something?
                      45. Konstantin Shevchenko
                        Konstantin Shevchenko 11 December 2022 15: 59
                        +5
                        And now the economic war has passed the hot phase. Who will push whom. Yes, they didn’t allow us and won’t allow us, if a quick run through the history of Russia they will definitely throw up a war. But if we cave in, then the blow will be to the common people and quite protractedly, the 90s may turn out to be flowers. Ruble devaluation and unemployment. If Russia stands, then they will have to talk to us on an equal footing.
                    2. alekseykabanets
                      alekseykabanets 12 December 2022 20: 39
                      +2
                      Quote: Konstantin Shevchenko
                      With microelectronics, we failed back in the USSR, there is a detailed rather large article on VO. Naturally, you can’t catch up here

                      Yes, there was no great failure there, there was a lag, maybe 7 years (subjectively), however, we had our own production of processors both in our country and in the CMEA countries (Tesla), in terms of printing technology, in my opinion they did not lag behind at all. The same 155th series was no worse than its foreign counterparts, like the 555th. The entire line of diodes, transistors, resistors, etc. was produced. etc.
                2. runway-1
                  runway-1 11 December 2022 21: 44
                  0
                  We were offered a colonial economic system, do you agree with such an international position (relations) I don't, Putin and Medvedev don't either.
                  What a touching story! Too bad it's not all true... lol
                  1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                    Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 15: 38
                    -1
                    And what is not true about it? Russia is among the developed countries, the so-called first?
            2. solar
              solar 11 December 2022 20: 52
              0
              the rarer the disease, the more expensive the medicines to cosmic prices.

              Generally speaking, this is normal. A new effective drug requires a large investment in development, which is then included in the price, and the fewer people who need it, the higher the price. After a while, they lose their monopoly rights and cheaper generics appear on the market. Otherwise, until now, one castor oil would have been treated.
              1. Konstantin Shevchenko
                Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 19: 02
                -1
                Everything would be as beautiful as enterprising managers usually say, with such an expression on their face that you would understand their position and understand why the medicines are so expensive. But I recall a case in the United States, when a certain enterprising person bought up shares and, as an owner, inflated prices for medicines by 1000 percent or more, just for rarely used medicines. He was put in jail, maybe you know the story too. But the prices have not been reduced. What's the point of writing about high-tech medicine if it's not accessible even to the middle class. In the hospital where Navalny was in bed, not every German can afford it.
      3. Patriot228
        Patriot228 11 December 2022 09: 59
        +1
        Yes, Germany is still supplying, if Germany refuses to supply medical equipment and consumables, the CBO will seem like flowers.
    2. mitrich
      mitrich 11 December 2022 13: 54
      +1
      Was it he who, salivating, reverently, like a shrine, accepted an iPhone from the hands of dear partners or sworn enemies?
    3. Konstantin Shevchenko
      Konstantin Shevchenko 12 December 2022 18: 42
      -1
      The colonists' methods have always been working for 400 years, they have never failed.
  4. Maks1995
    Maks1995 11 December 2022 09: 25
    +4
    It seems that devastating notes - that this is window dressing - about visiting an iPhone lover have already been here.
    Both photo analysis and news text analysis ...
  5. Hindu
    Hindu 11 December 2022 09: 27
    +2
    Quote: ASAD
    Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?


    Have you heard of the swift jack? laughing
    1. Asad
      Asad 11 December 2022 09: 30
      +4
      In the army, I had to dodge when I didn’t want to stand on the ice.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 11 December 2022 10: 48
        +2
        In the army, I had to dodge when I didn’t want to stand on the ice.
        This is understandable, but still re-read "12 chairs", the Hindu meant the jack, which is from there.
  6. Epaulettes
    Epaulettes 11 December 2022 09: 28
    +6
    And how many of these weapons were approximately in the conflict in 10 months? It feels like zero.
  7. ism_ek
    ism_ek 11 December 2022 09: 30
    +1
    The question is, why did they start increasing the production of weapons only in the summer?
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 11 December 2022 09: 50
      +8
      Germany, even after the winter slap in the face of the 41st, increased the production of medium / heavy tanks in 1942 by only 63%, and in 43 by 281% (from the 41st), which showed the country's absolute unpreparedness for a total and protracted war. Almost all wars are seen by strategists as short-term, but this happens extremely rarely. Only in the 44th Germany was able to produce 481% (from 1941), but it was too late, because the USSR already in the 42nd produced 4 times more tanks than the enemy. The industry of the Union and its people won.
      1. Magog_
        Magog_ 11 December 2022 13: 20
        -4
        in 1942 only by 63%, and in 43 by 281% (from the 41st)
        In the conditions of the rapid retreat of the spacecraft from the western borders, where such a quantity of our ammunition and weapons was abandoned that the Nazis could fight comfortably for more than a year, when during the flight from many mechanized corps only foot and horse columns remained, and all heavy equipment remained on the roads, etc., the enemy did not need to significantly increase the production of his own weapons - the captured was enough ... The USSR did the opposite ...
        1. Doccor18
          Doccor18 11 December 2022 15: 36
          +2
          Quote: Magog_
          In the context of the rapid retreat of the spacecraft from the western borders

          This all mainly refers to the first year of the war, but the figures (slightly different in the sources) indicate that the Germans lost almost their entire fleet of vehicles available for 42 years during the 41nd, and at the same time they produced a little more, and this is in the presence a front of great length and offensive operations in the south. Looking at the situation now, it becomes clear that by the end of 1942, the Germans had missed the opportunity to change something. In the Union, on the contrary, for the 42nd year everything more or less settled down, both the release and the cure of childhood diseases, and the states of the tank corps. The Germans lived with fairy tales about a quick turning point both at 42 and at 43. The USSR initially relied on mass character, on a protracted war, and all this, together with mass heroism (combat and labor), led to a logical result.
      2. solar
        solar 11 December 2022 20: 56
        -1
        showed the country's absolute unpreparedness for a total and protracted war.

        fundamental unpreparedness. Following the results of the First World War, Hitler believed that the people enduring the hardships and hardships of the war lead to social upheavals, therefore, until 1943, he tried to avoid this. Everything worked in peacetime.
  8. Deon59
    Deon59 11 December 2022 09: 33
    +3
    New physical principles - we steal with the right hand, then with the left, and then we rake with our hands.
  9. Yorgven
    Yorgven 11 December 2022 09: 38
    +3
    What are Aristotle's "new physical principles", what kind of heresy do they repeat one after another? Divorced charlatans ...
    1. Magog_
      Magog_ 11 December 2022 13: 33
      +1
      Divorced charlatans ...
      What else can be expected from "lawyers" in power? "New physical principles" from the lips of a humanitarian with the skills of "iPhone poking", with the culture of English-language "clips" and "sings" (pah-pah!) - this is the steepness of an accidental upstart from the environment of the current guarantor ...
  10. Comandor777
    Comandor777 11 December 2022 09: 42
    +3
    Let's wait and see, let's hope that this is not another vyser about a super duper weapon.
  11. Patriot228
    Patriot228 11 December 2022 09: 54
    +4
    Probably we are talking about "invisible" weapons, when money is allocated for it, and in the end the weapons are on paper, but no one can see them in reality. Those. as if in a parallel reality it exists, but in our dimension it is not visible. Quantum weapons. Or, for example, something like teleportation, when finances are allocated here, and then teleported to Western banks and turned into Western real estate.
  12. Turtle
    Turtle 11 December 2022 10: 10
    +1
    They are partly right when it comes to hypersonic cartoons - cartoons fulfill their mission, intercontinental nuclear batons are also present (I have no doubt for a second that our chips, self-tapping screws and adhesive tape are used for their production), but balalaikas with motors from mopeds without Iran - no way. All industries must be brought up to kosher Soviet standards!
  13. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 11 December 2022 10: 12
    +3
    Quote: Medvedev
    including new physical principles

    I'm sorry about WHAT?!!!! belay
    Or just like the word?
  14. agel26r
    agel26r 11 December 2022 10: 18
    +4
    if it’s for garlic, then the excessive activity of the iPhone bothers me, no matter how 91g is repeated with the advent of EBN
  15. Hindu
    Hindu 11 December 2022 10: 23
    0
    Quote: Yorgven
    What are Aristotle's "new physical principles", what kind of heresy do they repeat one after another? Divorced charlatans ...


    What is pop - such is the parish.
    1. Aviator_
      Aviator_ 11 December 2022 10: 50
      0
      What is pop - such is the parish.
      What table - such a chair (medical saying).
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. Andrey the Magnificent
    Andrey the Magnificent 11 December 2022 10: 51
    +2
    "Based on new physical principles..."

    "You need to have a snack" (c)
    1. mitrich
      mitrich 11 December 2022 14: 04
      +1
      Along the way, he still did not get drunk. Soon it will roll on a new one, we are waiting for the sparkling Kremlin humor again.
  18. Comrade I
    Comrade I 11 December 2022 11: 00
    +4
    And instead of all this nonsense, you can first equip the army with weapons based on "old" physical principles, even not so "powerful". Like the fact that the hotel in Stakhanov was covered?
  19. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 December 2022 11: 03
    -1
    So they need to be used for a long time, and we only produce everything. Embarrassing, yes.
  20. Nikolay310
    Nikolay310 11 December 2022 11: 07
    -2
    donrf
    Better to be than to seem. V. Pikul. There in Donetsk now a colleague who was 25 years old lies. Spinal fracture. Mobik. He had a mosquito as a weapon based on new principles. Model 1892. Two MLRS Grad and one Three axes make the city a nightmare. And in Moscow time music plays in the subway. And the cops look at the passports of visitors from Donetsk at the station. Without this, not a step from the bus. It came in large numbers .... Here is such a weapon based on new principles
  21. vitvit123
    vitvit123 11 December 2022 11: 08
    +1
    Who do they take us for? I have no words ...
  22. Raccoon Raccoon
    Raccoon Raccoon 11 December 2022 11: 48
    +2
    Lord, this one too... Tell him, finally, that in that part of the Universe where he lives, there are no new physical principles and, I hope, will not be. And if he is being "treated" about teleportation (a very convenient thing in the midst of hostilities, I agree) or lightsabers, God forbid, then it's time for him to move to the Marvel universe. It's all there and more! Although ... maybe he broadcasts from there, wretched ...
    1. mitrich
      mitrich 11 December 2022 14: 06
      +1
      Even against the background of the rest, walled miserable, it stands out in bright color.
  23. fa2998
    fa2998 11 December 2022 12: 10
    0
    Quote: Vasia
    Quote: fa2998
    Yes, and those who "earned" doctoral titles, who "pumped out of the treasury of the USSR, Russia, the USA and other countries, and for 50 years have not issued weapons" to the mountain - yes, scientists !!!

    I'm not talking about this, there are problems, but they are not connected"The focus is a few millimeters or centimeters away from the machine."
    Perhaps you expressed your thought poorly. hi

    Yes, unsuccessful! But I did not intend to start a scientific discussion here! The main laser weapon for DESTROYING GOALS IN THE EARTH ATMOSPHERE --- BLEF! This is a way to earn money from the treasury! hi hi
    1. Plate
      Plate 11 December 2022 13: 05
      +1
      Drones also liked to call it an expensive bluff. Electronic warfare will drop, without GPS they will be lost, the battery will sit down and in general a lot of problems. Well, what is the result? We sit here and scold the government for not preparing drones - that's what it is. But how many clever arguments were against a new type of weapon ... So what, again the same thing again, although the previous round of this insanity has not yet been completed?
      We will sit here with smart faces and say: "Lasers - cut the dough", "Not applicable in the atmosphere", "Spray water - and everything will fall" ... And then we will get involved in some kind of NWO year that way in 2030 or 2035 m and how we squeal together: "WHY DON'T THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE PREPARE FOR THE AGE OF LASER USE, huh?!"
      In my opinion, the main lesson of the NWO in Ukraine is precisely this. If there is a new weapon, take it, develop it and test it in a real conflict, and only then chop it off the shoulder if it doesn’t live up to expectations.

      PS And how many times has this happened. Here is the second case after writing the comment I remembered. Reusable rockets. "Cut the dough", "won't take off", "unreliable", "already was" ... And a few years later: "Why is the government not engaged in reusable rockets?"
      1. strannik1985
        strannik1985 11 December 2022 13: 17
        +2
        Well, what is the result?

        So they said correctly, by mid-May, about 900 UAVs were shot down. The nuance is in another normally, shot down - we launch a new one - we shot down - we launch a new one ...
        1. Plate
          Plate 11 December 2022 14: 12
          +2
          Yes, there is such a nuance. But this does not negate the fact that the direction in front of the NWO was scolded by all and sundry. Including here on VO. Including those authors who eventually began to scold the government for hindsight.
          1. strannik1985
            strannik1985 11 December 2022 15: 57
            +1
            But this does not negate the fact that the direction in front of the NWO was scolded by all and sundry.

            And here, too, there are nuances, the topic of UAVs is large and multifaceted, they usually choose priorities, something in the first place, something in the second.
            https://lopatov-45.livejournal.com/30166.html?noscroll&utm_medium=endless_scroll#comments
            So it turns out that, first of all, there are not enough drones capable of quickly taking the coordinates of targets, i.e. with a laser rangefinder-target designator on a stabilized platform. However, this is not enough, with the help of the UAV, the target was identified and the coordinates were given, but for calculating the defeat of an unplanned target, ASUNO and self-binding complexes are urgently needed.
            https://vpk.name/news/144596_asu_dlya_batarei.html
            The industry has been offering analogues to the military since the beginning of the 2000s, however ...
            Not to mention the replacement of "Sanya" with such analogues ...
            https://andrej-kraft.livejournal.com/286781.html
      2. Ratibor_A
        Ratibor_A 11 December 2022 14: 02
        -4
        Yes, it’s the cissists who are minus here and they write nasty things. The US and the EU themselves are developing the same developments, and we are ahead of them, so they set the population against us, so that we curtail development and trail behind progress, and they become leaders. It was the same during the collapse of the USSR, the same propaganda - everything in the USSR is a scoop, and Western democracy is good. What everyone has come to see .... I hope our authorities do not step on this rake a second time ...
        1. Plate
          Plate 11 December 2022 14: 11
          -1
          I don’t know who is ahead of whom, and even in the so-called. I don't believe in "bots", but the fact remains. It's been the same thing several times. "It's impossible" - "It's possible, but we don't need it" - "Someone may need it, but not us" - "It would be nice with this, but we can live calmly without it" - "A PACHIM WE ARE NOT IN ITAVA?!". And abroad, between our first and second stages, they began to develop. And right here in the comments, several users want to experience it again.
          Quote: Ratibor_A
          I hope our authorities do not step on this rake a second time ...

          Second? Yes, we attacked this already do not know how many times. The national character, perhaps, is this - deliberately not to develop the most advanced technologies, despite the availability of opportunities for this.
  24. Ratibor_A
    Ratibor_A 11 December 2022 13: 35
    0
    I'm looking in the comments idiots frolic or tsipso .... Let me explain what Medvedev meant. He meant new weapons based on new physical principles, i.e. there was no laser before - weapons, zircons, which are built on physical principles that were not previously used to create weapons. This can not be understood only by fools or a person interested in discrediting the Russian authorities. In general, according to the comments in this thread for yourself and the site administration, you can make a list of cissists, since there are only a few idiots here.
    1. Plate
      Plate 11 December 2022 14: 19
      +2
      Quote: Ratibor_A
      Let me explain what Medvedev meant.

      Yes, Wikipedia explains this in the very first lines of the corresponding article. That the principles themselves are new, and may have been known for a long time. They just weren't used in the military. But everyone needs to be smart, although almost immediately they threw a link to the same article much higher request
  25. Illanatol
    Illanatol 11 December 2022 13: 55
    +1
    Quote: Plate
    We will sit here with smart faces and say: "Lasers - cut the dough", "Not applicable in the atmosphere", "Spray water - and everything will fall" ... And then we will get involved in some kind of NWO year that way in 2030 or 2035 m and how we squeal together: "WHY DON'T THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE PREPARE FOR THE AGE OF LASER USE, huh?!"


    The difference is that work on laser weapons was carried out in our country back in Soviet times (as well as on microwave plasma weapons). Both the limitations and disadvantages of lasers have been identified experimentally. And practice, as you know, is the criterion of truth.
    However, work is still underway on laser weapons and there are still practical results.
    How are work on countermeasures against such weapons.
    1. Plate
      Plate 11 December 2022 14: 23
      +1
      Quote: Illanatol
      The difference is that work on laser weapons was carried out in our country back in Soviet times (as well as on microwave plasma weapons).

      Drones in general are also not a new invention. Even before WWII, there were teletanks in the USSR. Yes, and in Britain something similar was done with airplanes at about that time. V-1 is generally known to the whole world. And in the 80s there were all sorts of Tu-143s. So the negative reviews about drones relied on a strong foundation. But, nevertheless, in the end they turned out to be wrong. UAVs have reached the level of a really dangerous and independent weapon, and not something auxiliary, and we missed it, simultaneously laughing at their development in some other armies.
      Quote: Illanatol
      However, work is still underway on laser weapons and there are still practical results.

      Exactly. Lasers will also reach this level. Maybe at this stage of development. Maybe on the next one. But they will come out. And I would not want to miss the moment, as it happened with drones. As I noted above, UAVs also did not immediately become what they are now.
      1. bukhach
        bukhach 11 December 2022 16: 55
        +3
        Quote: Plate
        Even before WWII, there were teletanks in the USSR.

        We also had marine "drones" -boats, and equipped one TB-3 in the air version, so we tried to look beyond the horizon, another thing is that the resources and capabilities of the industry were not up to par, stretch your legs in clothes.
      2. Timur_kz
        Timur_kz 11 December 2022 20: 08
        -1
        I'm here with ground-based drones from comment to comment, Witnesses of the Holy EW in unison in one voice - drown out the reb. And okay, here on the site, it’s not scary, but exactly the same sectarians are sitting in the Moscow Region, the General Staff. After the story with the marching song, I am not surprised at anything.

        The same developments in technical vision (neural network) in civilian life in Russia are decent, there is a serious backlog. What prevents you from putting your brains on an old T72 or even T62 box and sending them to a real crew, while the drones will identify targets, the partner with the crew will suppress them.
        1. Plate
          Plate 11 December 2022 21: 34
          +1
          I think we should give algorithms the ability to kill people. I saw - I counted something there for myself - I made a decision - I killed it. You just need to come up with a good protection against hacking. Well, in the coming years, they promise a good development of cryptography.
          1. Timur_kz
            Timur_kz 11 December 2022 23: 42
            -1
            The current protection is enough, especially to take control of an independent AI - it's the same as taking control of a real fighter or tank. You can drown it out, but the same copters in such cases just fly home. In general, autonomous AI is ideal for loitering UAVs, such as harop or geranium. In our conditions, the lack of developed means of reconnaissance and guidance to the operational depth is just that. You simply indicate the area of ​​​​the alleged presence of the enemy, and then the UAV itself detects and destroys enemy objects. The neural network can easily distinguish military equipment from civilian ones. Friendly fire is solved simply - the area is strictly "outlined" in which there are no allied troops, everything that a military man finds - destroy. It’s true that there is a problem with confirmation, but you can equip it with a simple transmitter, before attacking a UAV, you would take a picture or even a short video on any UAV repeater located in the distance. Yes, damn it, a lot of things could have been invented in the same 10 months, if there was a desire.
            1. Plate
              Plate 12 December 2022 10: 06
              0
              Quote: Timur_kz
              It’s true that there is a problem with confirmation, but you can equip it with a simple transmitter, before attacking a UAV, you would take a picture or even a short video on any UAV repeater located in the distance.

              Yes, on the drum for confirmation. If the UAV area is guaranteed to have no equipment of its own, and a foreign population lives there, then it’s not scary to confuse military equipment with civilian equipment a couple of times. The Americans out there by mistake (sort of) bomb all sorts of people in Afghanistan and don’t care about it at all. And then the neural network messed up something. "Well, it happens, we will train her further."
  26. thepuppeteer
    thepuppeteer 11 December 2022 15: 25
    0
    OK time will tell. But bluffing is a poor tactic even the Italian Mafia Has discontinued this tactic. It's a bit old school to use this tactic
    Old foxes from politics and arms industry use it.But it's outdated! It's all about framing, data manipulation, blackmailing and surprise the other party that's the winners game. The rest is old school and journalism carp talk.. But people love carp it's like drugs
  27. Egeny
    Egeny 11 December 2022 18: 26
    +1
    Quote: ASAD
    what does "new physical principles" mean?

    Everything unconventional: laser, hypersound, seismic ...
  28. Egeny
    Egeny 11 December 2022 18: 35
    +3
    Quote: Mikhalych
    Who exactly invented the laser?

    Mikhalych, have you forgotten about the hyperboloid (analogous to a laser)?
    It was invented by engineer Garin, and this unit was turned on from a match or a lighter.))
  29. Egeny
    Egeny 11 December 2022 18: 44
    0
    Quote from thepuppeteer
    Time will tell. But bluffing is a poor tactic

    So we don't bluff.)
    By the way, we are not a mafia and we do not play these toys. Uncle Vova is not an old fox, if he said that hundreds, hundreds of rockets will rise into the air, then it will be so.)
  30. Egeny
    Egeny 11 December 2022 18: 48
    0
    Quote: Plate
    Lasers will also reach this level.

    Good evening. I just remembered engineer Garin's hyperboloid.)
  31. usm5
    usm5 11 December 2022 20: 11
    0
    It would not hurt to back up such statements with successes at the front.
  32. Veter5757
    Veter5757 11 December 2022 22: 06
    -1
    There is no money - but you hold on !!!
    And from which Nebenzya does he sign for the military-industrial complex?
  33. highlight
    highlight 11 December 2022 23: 51
    0
    Quote: ASAD
    Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?

    das is wunderwaffe?
  34. acetophenone
    acetophenone 12 December 2022 20: 49
    0
    Quote: ASAD
    Please tell me what does "new physical principles" mean?

    NOTHING. Absolutely NOTHING. wunderwaffe. Do you know what Hitler promised his soldiers? This one promises.