Military Review

Vladimir Putin: Attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are only a retaliatory measure

78
Vladimir Putin: Attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are only a retaliatory measure

Today, the ceremony of awarding the Gold Star medals to the Heroes of Russia took place in the Kremlin. The event was held on the eve of Heroes of the Fatherland Day, celebrated in the Russian Federation on December 9th. It was attended by more than 200 military and civilians who showed special courage and heroism, including Heroes of the Soviet Union, Heroes of the Russian Federation and holders of the Order of St. George.


President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin addressed the audience with a welcoming speech. The Russian President stressed the inextricable historical the connection between the heroes of the past and today, for whom the feeling of love for the Motherland is the highest value.

Putin addressed the present military personnel, participants in the special military operation, who continue the great deeds of their ancestors with their exploits and will be awarded the title of Hero of Russia. The Russian president addressed separate words of gratitude and support to the soldiers who are now on the front lines:

I also want to address those who are on the front lines: for me, for all our fellow citizens, each of you is a hero. And I really want you to feel the warmth of our hearts, the warmth of this truly nationwide support.

Separately, the President of the Russian Federation addressed our test cosmonauts, emphasizing that they deserve the title of heroes for choosing a profession associated with great personal risk, while it is their work that leads the country to new successes and achievements. No less important are the feats of those who "save others, who perform labor feats in science, in production, in teaching or in the medical field," the head of state noted.

Vladimir Putin urged not to forget about those Russians who gave their lives defending their Motherland, who are being treated, wishing them a speedy recovery and noting that their families and loved ones should be remembered.

Concluding his speech, the President of Russia recalled that the Motherland is not just a territory:

These are people, first of all, whom you protect - this is what the Motherland is. We all understand this and we are all grateful to you and your comrades-in-arms for what you are doing for the Fatherland.

After the ceremony, Vladimir Putin spoke to the audience and answered questions. In particular, the Russian leader, with his inherent straightforwardness, did not leave the topic of inflicting massive strikes by the RF Armed Forces on the energy infrastructure of Ukraine, calling them a response to the actions of the Kyiv authorities.

The President recalled the sabotage on the Crimean bridge and the blowing up of power lines at the Kursk nuclear power plant. Putin called the shutdown by the Ukrainian regime of the water supply to the millionth city of Donetsk "an act of genocide." At the same time, no one in the West raises a fuss about the crimes of Kyiv, but if Russia does something serious in response, then immediately “noise, din, crackling all over the universe.”

This will not interfere with our combat missions.

the president summed up.
Author:
Photos used:
Site of the President of the Russian Federation
78 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. voice of reason
    voice of reason 8 December 2022 18: 10
    -19
    We beat, we beat and we will beat. the torch and candles jumped in price on the outskirts.
    1. Machito
      Machito 8 December 2022 18: 23
      +2
      Quote: voice of reason
      We beat, we beat and we will beat. the torch and candles jumped in price on the outskirts.

      Why make excuses? The explosion of an "air conditioner" in Donetsk in 2014 is enough as a pretext for the destruction of Ukraine's critical infrastructure. Well, yes, and Ukrovermacht does not let up: every day, by its actions, it provides dozens (if not hundreds) of reasons for plunging Ukraine into the Stone Age.
      1. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 09
        +8
        Quote: Bearded
        Why make excuses?

        That's it.
        It's dumb to talk / mumble about "retaliatory measures" when Russia started the NWO.
        You have to push and finish.
        For all the stated items.
        1. Plate
          Plate 8 December 2022 22: 26
          -3
          So this is an attempt at all attempts to expose yourself as a victim. Classic.
  2. Boniface
    Boniface 8 December 2022 18: 11
    +23
    Kind of weird! sad
    We started the NWO with certain goals and objectives, and now we are taking a "defensive" position - They us, we them No.
    1. Denis812
      Denis812 8 December 2022 18: 21
      +6
      From the point of view of the general world (not only Western) public, it is always more correct to strike only in response.
      That's why Putin says so.
      He is listened to not only in the Russian Federation and in the West. Or do you want him to say that yes, they say, we are the aggressors?
      He says exactly the same about CBO that this is an operation for PROTECTION. Not an attack on the state.
      Otherwise, he would have simply lost the explicit or implicit support of many states automatically.
      It doesn't matter if what he says is true. It is correct to say exactly that - that we are defending ourselves.
      And absolutely everyone says so - the USSR in Afghanistan, the USA in Vietnam, France in Mali.
      Everyone is talking about "protection". It doesn't matter if it is or not. But that's the way it should be said.
      Because then you have at least some moral right to war.
      1. Yves762
        Yves762 8 December 2022 18: 43
        +3
        Quote: Denis812
        Everyone is talking about "protection". It doesn't matter if it is or not. But that's the way it should be said.
        Because then you have at least some moral right to war.

        There is no moral right here. There is speculation. "With special cynicism" as they once wrote ...
        1. Denis812
          Denis812 8 December 2022 18: 55
          -2
          It's how you want it. You can talk about cynicism.
          But then, as a statesman, you will not succeed.
          Everyone should always say "let's protect .." and a bunch of options, for example, <human rights and freedoms> <our citizens abroad> <our right to worship the pasta monster> and so on.
          That's when you will be accepted.
          Because it is protection, and people instinctively always accept it better than aggression.
          Even if this very aggression is caused by preventive defense. :)
          1. Kronos
            Kronos 8 December 2022 19: 08
            +3
            There is no preventive defense, always in the first place the one who started the war is to blame.
            1. Denis812
              Denis812 8 December 2022 19: 32
              +2
              a small amendment "guilty from the point of view of international law".
              And preventive defense does exist.
              For example, the United States invaded Iraq, saying that there is supposedly WMD there and that it must be urgently punished.
              1. solar
                solar 8 December 2022 23: 18
                +2
                a small amendment "guilty from the point of view of international law".

                from the point of view of Russian law, article 353 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. From 7 to 20.
                And preventive defense does exist.
                For example, the United States invaded Iraq, saying that there is supposedly WMD there and that it must be urgently punished.

                In fact, it was Iraq that attacked Kuwait, which was officially recorded by a UN decision.
                1. Denis812
                  Denis812 9 December 2022 09: 41
                  0
                  You should teach history...
                  Iraq attacked Kuwait in 1990. Iraq withdrew from Kuwait in 1991.
                  The Americans invaded Iraq in 2003.
                  Yes, and the Americans themselves name a completely different reason, namely the presence of WMD in Iraq.
                  Which then they themselves recognized as a lie.
                  1. solar
                    solar 10 December 2022 03: 50
                    -1
                    Iraq attacked Kuwait in 1990. Iraq withdrew from Kuwait in 1991.

                    did not leave, but was expelled, declaring war in accordance with the UN Charter. And they temporarily suspended hostilities, putting up a list of conditions from a dozen points, in which WMD was only one of the points.
                    And when Iraq finally refused to fulfill them, the fighting continued.
                    1. Denis812
                      Denis812 10 December 2022 12: 37
                      0
                      If you want to call it "kicked out", well, ok.
                      But do you understand that having "expelled" in 1991, you have no excuse to invade a sovereign state in 2003?
                      They waved the test tube at the UN. All this is a lie, which the States themselves admitted.
                      It is from this lie that the state government of the planet ends.
                      They could have ruled for another thousand years, but no, they wanted to plant their own cultures.
                      Well, now they'll get hooked. They will get tired of digging themselves.
                      1. solar
                        solar 11 December 2022 03: 18
                        -2
                        But do you understand that having "expelled" in 1991, you have no excuse to invade a sovereign state in 2003?

                        I understand that you do not understand that in 1991 there was a temporary cessation of hostilities, subject to Iraq fulfilling a set of conditions and requirements set by the UN to Iraq in accordance with the UN Charter in UN Security Council Resolution No. 687 (against which the USSR did not object) - there these There were a dozen or two conditions and requirements. Iraq did not comply with them, which was specifically recorded by UN Security Council Resolution 1441 of 2002 (against which the Russian Federation did not object), so the hostilities continued further.
                        So do you understand?
                      2. Denis812
                        Denis812 11 December 2022 08: 28
                        0
                        Sergey, you understand that a permanent member of the UN Security Council, namely the United States, represented by its top diplomat, DECEIVED the whole world, we will report that Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction.
                        And ALL decisions made on the basis of this person's false statement are wrong.
                        Secondly, open the documents you refer to and show me with your finger WHERE, for example, in 1441 it is written that the US is given the right to attack Iraq if it does not fulfill the requirement of 1441?
                        There are a lot of words about serious consequences and sincere concerns.
                        No more.
                        The UN Security Council did not give any sanction for the use of force against Iraq.
                        The US did it because they could. That's all. Just like in Yugoslavia.
                        Showing everyone that the strong do what he wants.
            2. nickname7
              nickname7 9 December 2022 03: 48
              0
              There is no preventive defense

              You are illiterate. In the legal practice of the British there is a term "preventive blows". Since 92, Ukraine proper began to be prepared as a cordon sanitaire, although Yeltsin hugged Clinton at that time. The Anglo-Saxons do not wait for thunder, as is customary with us, but neutralize potential dangers in advance, and therefore they rule the world.
              guilty of starting the war

              Complete stupidity is always to blame for the loser.
          2. DymOk_v_dYmke
            DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 16
            0
            Quote: Denis812
            Because it is protection, and people instinctively always accept it better than aggression.
            Even if this very aggression is caused by preventive defense. :)

            Exactly. It's time to create a league to protect the right to fart in defiance of the green Greta ..
            and then bomb right and left defending this right. laughing
            1. Plate
              Plate 8 December 2022 22: 29
              -1
              "In Sweden, the human right to fart anytime, anywhere has been violated! But don't worry, valiant citizens of Sweden! Russia will save you!"
              * six months later, Stockholm lies in ruins, Sweden's GDP has been reduced by 3 times, the Swedish Armed Forces have been bombed, there is no question of joining NATO * wassat
              And then a year later: "We have received information that in Finland a man in a bathhouse was publicly condemned for having farted ..."
          3. Yves762
            Yves762 8 December 2022 19: 30
            +2
            "Lie to the rescue".?.
            Ha! Let's refer to the classics: "The road to Hell is paved with good intentions!" lol
        2. nickname7
          nickname7 9 December 2022 03: 55
          0
          special cynicism" as they once wrote

          Politics is the ultimate dirty and cynical thing, alas, one must comply otherwise they will be devoured.
      2. Ryaruav
        Ryaruav 8 December 2022 19: 34
        +2
        Denis, the Americans hit where they want, when they want, and they don’t give a damn about your especially non-Western world community, and they’re doing the right thing purely for themselves
        1. Santa Fe
          Santa Fe 9 December 2022 04: 52
          +4
          Americans beat where they want when they wantand they don’t give a damn about your especially non-Western world community and purely for themselves they are doing the right thing

          You overestimate the Yankees a bit

          To beat everyone indiscriminately, even they do not dare.

          Each country hit by the United States had serious internal contradictions, was in a state of decline, civil war, permanent chaos, poverty, or ran into trouble itself (the example of Iraq in 1991)

          To avoid the Yankee invasion, you just need to be a developed country, without a leadership that has gone out of your mind (corrected ... as they say)

          There is no question of fairness. But the facts - a stubborn thing, everyone who was bombed by the Yankees - turned out like on a movie poster.

          It's hard to say, here to sympathize with which side
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 9 December 2022 10: 38
            0
            Quote: Santa Fe
            Each country whom the United States beat had serious internal contradictions, was in a state of decline, civil war, permanent chaos, poverty

            To which it was often brought by the actions of the United States. wink
            Any war for democracy requires careful preparation, during which the enemy is strangled economically and dehumanized morally. Moreover, any methods are permissible in this phase - the war will write off everything, and post factum denials are of no interest to anyone, because the dead do not care anymore.
            And only after that the sacred campaign begins for your freedom and ours.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      3. solar
        solar 9 December 2022 00: 08
        +2
        From the point of view of the general world (not only Western) public, it is always more correct to strike only in response.

        And you are completely and absolutely right in this matter.
        Moreover, there is an international Convention on the Definition of Aggression, which clearly spells out what aggression is, there is an even more detailed resolution of the UN General Assembly on this matter. And for a Western layman, these are not empty pieces of paper, their attitude depends on this, and, accordingly, the degree of participation. Nobody likes the aggressor, because everyone sees him as a threat to himself.
        That's why Putin says so.

        He says this, but he does it differently.
        He is listened to not only in the Russian Federation and in the West. Or do you want him to say that yes, they say, we are the aggressors?
        He says exactly the same about CBO that this is an operation for PROTECTION. Not an attack on the state.

        Do you think everyone else is stupid? And yes, back in March, if I'm not mistaken, the UN General Assembly officially adopted a resolution stating that it was Russia that was the aggressor. And the Western man in the street now comes from this. He is ready to tighten his belt in the fight against the aggressor, as he sees in him a threat to himself. Therefore, deliveries will only grow, especially against the background of such decisions as strikes on the energy system, which have no military meaning, which was confirmed at the highest level.
        And the strikes on the power system only exacerbated this.
  3. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 8 December 2022 18: 12
    +9
    Well, what if there hadn’t been a terrorist attack on the bridge? So what? Could there have been no retaliatory measures?
    1. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 8 December 2022 18: 14
      -1
      in ancient times, too, everything was attributed to higher powers
      and in recent history - we are the highest power (!)
  4. g_ae
    g_ae 8 December 2022 18: 16
    +8
    And what will be the response to the daily shelling of now Russian cities in the Donbass? And when? And when will these attacks end? It's Russian citizens who are dying.
    1. Nikolay310
      Nikolay310 8 December 2022 18: 19
      -3
      these citizens were in the Ozero cooperative? No...
  5. Nikolay310
    Nikolay310 8 December 2022 18: 18
    +1
    that is, if the Ukrainians do not fire on Engels or blow up the Crimean bridge, can we pretend that nothing is happening? and regular shelling of Donetsk, Shebekino and further down the list does not count? they didn’t promise the lazy Polushebekins and they didn’t get up like that, but if they got up like the Crimeans, they would immediately uuuuu ... but I’m trying so hard, I just can’t remember, but how did the Crimeans “stand up” ... how Donetsk and Luhansk fought -8 years it is known how Belgorod and Shebekino have been under fire for several months, it is known .... but about the phenomenal rise of the Crimeans, I just can’t ... you see, I have sclerosis ... well, or insanity for someone else. ..

    with such a commander in chief, even Vasilevsky, Rokossovsky and Zhukov would not have done anything
    1. haron
      haron 8 December 2022 18: 36
      +1
      Quote: Nikolay310
      and further down the list do not count?

      Kherson for today we consider?
      I do not argue, the issue is problematic.
      Quote: Nikolay310
      but about the phenomenal rise of the Crimeans, I just can’t ... you see, I have sclerosis ...

      If your "sclerosis" reaches the middle of the 18th century, then you will understand everything.
      Crimean is not a nationality - it is a diagnosis. In the Russian Federation, this diagnosis falls under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
  6. Vic Vic
    Vic Vic 8 December 2022 18: 18
    +9
    "Attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are exclusively a retaliatory measure"
    This approach is disappointing.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 23
      +3
      Quote from vicvic
      "Attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are exclusively a retaliatory measure"
      This approach is disappointing.

      Yes, too multi-way multi-way.
    2. nickname7
      nickname7 9 December 2022 03: 59
      0
      This approach is disappointing.

      Come on, Americans never say we need oil in your country, they say they'll bring you democracy.
    3. Kurganets-45
      Kurganets-45 9 December 2022 07: 51
      +1
      one must judge by deeds, not words, otherwise a blow from all spiritual surveys may suffice. The word is worth little nowadays. Justice and honor, that's what should be our national idea.
  7. Alexga
    Alexga 8 December 2022 18: 25
    +4
    Vladimir Putin talked to the audience and answered questions. In particular, the Russian leader, with his inherent straightforwardness, did not leave the topic of inflicting massive strikes by the RF Armed Forces on the energy infrastructure of Ukraine, calling them a response to the actions of the Kyiv authorities.

    And I thought that the blows to the energy system of Ukraine were inflicted to achieve Victory. Your deeds are strange, Lord!
  8. Michael
    Michael 8 December 2022 18: 28
    +1
    Before starting to fight, 37 years and the mobilization of the economy are necessary. And then, there were so many problems and shortcomings that you yourself know everything. And if you start as in the 14th, then there is not here. Faith and the king are gone. And the Fatherland alone will not succeed, even together with the Motherland.
    1. Denis812
      Denis812 8 December 2022 18: 37
      +1
      For some reason I think that you did not live in 1937.
      And if they lived, they would not want a repetition of what happened then.
      Economic mobilization doesn't just happen. It occurs ONLY due to the colossal drop in the living standards of the civilian population and contempt for their rights, such as 8 hour work days, insurance and minimum wages.
      Do you really want this? Maybe you want 10-year-old children to equip the machine tools?
      Do you need this?
      1. Michael
        Michael 8 December 2022 19: 09
        0
        Quote: Denis812
        For some reason I think that you did not live in 1937.
        Do you need this?

        I think you do too.
        I don't need at all. I prefer to make love, not war. Plow the land, build a house, raise children and soon grandchildren. But, constantly someone interferes with my peaceful existence. Vouchers, liberalization, defaults and sanctions. Now SVO. What for? Why is it impossible to trade and live peacefully?
        1. Denis812
          Denis812 8 December 2022 19: 34
          -1
          Well, don't do it. If you are such a make love note thief, why do you need 1937 again?
          Repeat the loss of 20 million?
        2. nickname7
          nickname7 9 December 2022 04: 03
          0
          Why you can not trade and live peacefully

          The masters are fighting, and the serfs' forelocks are cracking (C)
          Alas, the share of a serf in all srvnas is heavy.
    2. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 26
      +1
      Quote: Michael
      Before starting to fight, 37 years and the mobilization of the economy are needed.

      To do this, even before you need the 17th. hi
      1. Plate
        Plate 8 December 2022 22: 33
        -1
        Yes, you go with your 17th. Seriously. The Civil War did not give up for free.
  9. Boris Sergeev
    Boris Sergeev 8 December 2022 18: 34
    +6
    It is a pity that Putin was not asked whose sons would be killed by an English mercenary who was freed by Abramovich and returned to Ukraine. Sean Pinner.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 32
      +2
      It is safe to kick Abramovich, but without approval, he would not have said a word and would not have wedged into the delegation.
  10. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 8 December 2022 18: 36
    0
    Quote: Michael
    Before starting to fight, 37 years and the mobilization of the economy are necessary. And then, there were so many problems and shortcomings that you yourself know everything. And if you start as in the 14th, then there is not here. Faith and the king are gone. And the Fatherland alone will not succeed, even together with the Motherland.


    Slogan set drinks
  11. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 8 December 2022 18: 37
    -6
    Quote: Boris Sergeev
    It is a pity that Putin was not asked whose sons would be killed by an English mercenary who was freed by Abramovich and returned to Ukraine. Sean Pinner.


    These are the problems of the mercenary himself. He is responsible for his deeds before the Almighty good
    1. haron
      haron 8 December 2022 18: 43
      +2
      Quote from BattleToads
      He is responsible for his deeds before the Almighty

      Ba! Yes, we are liberals!
      Only the Almighty answers a person completely free from "earthly prejudices."
      Well, just in case, translate the word "liberal" from the enemy into Russian.
    2. Denis812
      Denis812 8 December 2022 19: 35
      +1
      I'd rather have him hanged first in this world. And what God decides with him is none of our business, but I think there will be a frying pan for him in hell.
    3. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 35
      +1
      Quote from BattleToads
      These are the problems of the mercenary himself. He is responsible for his deeds before the Almighty

      It would be better if he answered before the Almighty being hanged or shot in the LDNR.
    4. Boris Sergeev
      Boris Sergeev 8 December 2022 19: 39
      +1
      This is the problem of those who, announcing mobilization on the same day or even a little earlier, gave Abramovich a sanction for the removal of convicted war criminals.
    5. Fat
      Fat 8 December 2022 22: 48
      0
      Quote from BattleToads
      He is responsible for his deeds before the Almighty

      Preferably up to 7 knees laughing
  12. Ghost1
    Ghost1 8 December 2022 18: 37
    +7
    That is, if the Ukrainians, due to their stupidity, had not hit our bridge, power lines, then they would have everything in openwork now, electricity, heat, fuel. A strange NWO, when everything is fine behind enemy lines.
  13. Boson
    Boson 8 December 2022 18: 38
    +2
    What Putin says should not be taken literally.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 38
      +7
      Quote: Boson
      What Putin says should not be taken literally.

      Better not to take it at all.
      There will be less disappointments.
  14. ASM
    ASM 8 December 2022 18: 38
    -4
    Well, actually, strikes against the Russian Federation, according to the decree of June 2, 2020 N 355, section 3, clause 17 - the Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types against it and (or) its allies weapons of mass destruction, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.
    Here there are moments - "other weapons of mass destruction", and also, separately and de jure not connected, "a threat to the existence of the Russian Federation." So zelebobiki can theoretically jump. And we have very small charges.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 43
      -1
      Quote from A.S.M.
      Well, actually, strikes against the Russian Federation, according to the decree of June 2, 2020 N 355, section 3, clause 17 - the Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types against it and (or) its allies weapons of mass destruction, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.
      Here there are moments - "other weapons of mass destruction", and also, separately and de jure not connected, "a threat to the existence of the Russian Federation." So zelebobiki can theoretically jump. And we have very small charges.

      Here's a little more on that:
  15. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 8 December 2022 18: 43
    0
    Quote: haron
    Quote from BattleToads
    He is responsible for his deeds before the Almighty

    Ba! Yes, we are liberals!
    Only the Almighty answers a person completely free from "earthly prejudices."
    Well, just in case, translate the word "liberal" from the enemy into Russian.


    How long have you been a liberal? good
  16. al3x
    al3x 8 December 2022 18: 52
    +2
    And how long will this snotty rhetoric last, in order to justify itself for the necessary actions. Why not say something like: "Strikes on the infrastructure of Ukraine as a preventive measure will continue, with the aim of once and for all to bring down the military and industrial potential of the neo-Nazi regime. The number of strikes will increase. From now on, there will be no more hope for negotiations for the Ukrainian authorities intend. The train has left."
    That's not possible, is it? Well, or smarter somehow with such a meaning.
    1. dauria
      dauria 8 December 2022 19: 05
      +3
      That's not possible, is it?

      If did so, you could say whatever you want. The people would understand. And then there is only one talking shop.
      1. al3x
        al3x 8 December 2022 21: 20
        -1
        Yes, everything is correct about the talking shop. He did not fully reveal his idea that words need to be confirmed by deeds, and not scratched with the tongue.
  17. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 8 December 2022 18: 58
    -3
    Quote: al3x
    And how long will this snotty rhetoric last, in order to justify itself for the necessary actions. Why not say something like: "Strikes on the infrastructure of Ukraine as a preventive measure will continue, with the aim of once and for all to bring down the military and industrial potential of the neo-Nazi regime. The number of strikes will increase. From now on, there will be no more hope for negotiations for the Ukrainian authorities intend. The train has left."
    That's not possible, is it?


    What does it matter how he explains it if the blows happen? Talk less, do more, whatever you like, sir drinks
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 December 2022 19: 53
      +1
      Quote from BattleToads
      What does it matter how he explains it if the blows happen? Talk less, do more, whatever you like, sir

      And what, excuse me, is "doing more" expressed?
      What are the shifts?
  18. Roma 1977
    Roma 1977 8 December 2022 19: 00
    +6
    But is it not possible to strike not in response, but a little in advance, how will the enemy carry out his previously repeatedly expressed threats? And then people have questions.
  19. Archivist Vasya
    Archivist Vasya 8 December 2022 19: 11
    +5
    calling them a response to the actions of the Kyiv authorities.

    - but this is a very big mistake showing the stupidity and shortsightedness of the supreme fool (losing ground, it's time to rest). Strikes on the energy structure (and even better bridges) must be delivered simply to make the enemy feel bad, everything is to bring victory closer, but not in response to something because it is counterproductive.
    1. Plate
      Plate 8 December 2022 22: 37
      +4
      The Supreme is trying not to get confused in rhetoric, it turns out to be very complicated. We call the shelling of Donetsk, including its social infrastructure, genocide, but we ourselves are doing the same thing - we are bombing the energy infrastructure. And this is not genocide, remember. And this is how to twist everything so cunningly so that everyone remembers: an attack on a thermal power plant near Donetsk is a deliberate genocide, an attack on a thermal power plant near Kiev is a forced retaliatory measure that no one wanted.
      Propaganda, as always, is cruel and ruthless.
  20. ddAWOL
    ddAWOL 8 December 2022 19: 19
    +4
    What kind of response is that? Started to fight - fight. And it turns out that there would be no strikes on the infrastructure of Ukraine at all if there were no Ukraine's strike on the Crimean bridge.
  21. sifgame
    sifgame 8 December 2022 19: 56
    +1
    Why these excuses, the culprit for them will always be Russia, a tribunal is already being assembled on it. If we are for them, the orcs, the evil empire, then we need to comply and the statements must be appropriate. For example, "if some whore crosses the border of Ukraine, he will receive a preventive nuclear strike on western Ukraine." As for the infrastructure - it's out like in a war, otherwise it's just like the boys in the yard - "you hit first, you hit back." I mean, this was not an integral part of the plan, according to some kind of "cunning plan" of the offensive, but simply an answer for the bridge. With such conspiracy, this war will not end in victory, and it’s clear that the dead will be handed over, another month of cold winter and greenery will be imprisoned for negotiations and our bosses will run to conclude Minsk 3 under “guarantees”, ha ha, Germany and France.
  22. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 8 December 2022 20: 31
    -2
    Quote: sifgame
    Why these excuses, the culprit for them will always be Russia, a tribunal is already being assembled on it. If we are for them, the orcs, the evil empire, then we need to comply and the statements must be appropriate. For example, "if some whore crosses the border of Ukraine, he will receive a preventive nuclear strike on western Ukraine." As for the infrastructure - it's out like in a war, otherwise it's just like the boys in the yard - "you hit first, you hit back." I mean, this was not an integral part of the plan, according to some kind of "cunning plan" of the offensive, but simply an answer for the bridge. With such conspiracy, this war will not end in victory, and it’s clear that the dead will be handed over, another month of cold winter and greenery will be imprisoned for negotiations and our bosses will run to conclude Minsk 3 under “guarantees”, ha ha, Germany and France.


    It doesn't matter how it will be explained by the enemies of Russia and how they understand it, from this missiles flying to targets are neither warm nor cold, they just fly to targets! drinks
  23. solar
    solar 8 December 2022 23: 21
    +1
    For two months they were convinced that strikes on the energy system were to disrupt the supply of weapons from the West. But as the flow of weapons only intensified, its nomenclature expanded, a new explanation appeared.
  24. iouris
    iouris 8 December 2022 23: 30
    +3
    I did not understand.
    What's happening? Can anyone explain? Do not disturb Peskov.
  25. ASM
    ASM 9 December 2022 00: 27
    +5
    He would have died already, along with the Caudle. Really tired for a long time, and after the castling with Medvedev, he became a traitor for me personally.
  26. alexey2073
    alexey2073 9 December 2022 06: 57
    0
    They themselves unleashed their own war, and now, like patience, we only answer, but we need to put pressure on everything and everything on 404. And this should have been done from the very beginning. Over the years that the Russian Federation expressed concern and faith in partners and friends, the 404th was so brainwashed that now and in 100500 years, there will not be those who will treat the Russian Federation and its citizens well.
  27. kill the fascist
    kill the fascist 9 December 2022 08: 55
    -2
    A tear still needs to be shed because of pity for the Ukrainian sufferers. Enough already to fill in stories about partners and brotherly people. Listen to the media and government officials - the SVO is being fought against some kind of neo-Nazis and Western mercenaries helping them. Whom it is time for someone to decide, as in the old joke - either take off the cross or put on shorts.
  28. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 9 December 2022 10: 45
    -2
    Quote from A.S.M.
    He would have died already, along with the Caudle. Really tired for a long time, and after the castling with Medvedev, he became a traitor for me personally.


    Or would you rather shoot yourself? And you are calmer and we are not bored drinks
    1. alekseykabanets
      alekseykabanets 9 December 2022 11: 44
      -2
      Quote from BattleToads
      Or would you rather shoot yourself? And you are calmer and we are not bored

      Start with yourself, so to speak, inspire us by personal example.
  29. Battle Toads
    Battle Toads 9 December 2022 11: 48
    -3
    Quote: aleksejkabanets
    Quote from BattleToads
    Or would you rather shoot yourself? And you are calmer and we are not bored

    Start with yourself, so to speak, inspire us by personal example.


    Do I really look like a dull whiner, an all-rounder or a fighting couch housewife? The President suits me very much! drinks
  30. Timur_kz
    Timur_kz 9 December 2022 23: 56
    +1
    That is stupid revenge)) And then some here, including the military correspondents in the cart, argued that this effectively affects the front. And the Supreme Commander directly says - here you are to us, and we are bad for you. Well, the Russian World is being built, you can't say anything.