Governor of the Belgorod Region: AFU shelled the village of Yakovlevo, which is north of Belgorod

On the morning of December 8, the Ukrainian army shelled a village in the Yakovlevsky urban district of the Belgorod region. This was announced by the Governor of the region Vyacheslav Gladkov in his Telegram channel.

As the head of the regional administration noted, according to preliminary data, there were no casualties among civilians. As a result of the shelling, the power line was damaged. Now emergency teams of power engineers are working at the scene of the incident, which eliminate the consequences of the shelling.

In addition, the administration continues door-to-door detours, asking local residents for possible damage as a result of the shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Social networks of the Belgorod region, meanwhile, report that an air defense system was operating in the region. There are also reports of a fire in the village of Yakovlevo.

Recall that Yakovlevo is an urban-type settlement in the Belgorod region. It is located 30 kilometers north of Belgorod, so the village cannot be attributed to purely border settlements.

Yesterday, Governor Gladkov reported on enemy missiles shot down by air defense systems over the village of Kuleshovka, Belgorod Region.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian publics report an air alert in the Kharkiv region. It is possible that the shelling of the Belgorod region will be followed by a prompt response from the Russian armed forces.

Comments

[Chuck-norris]

Well, Putin recently said that they would demand reparations from Ukraine for the affected regions. We believe. We wait. Nobody will be forgotten.

[Horn]

Believe. Wait. Hope. He definitely won't cheat. He never lies. He even taught the Siberian Cranes to fly.

[Sailor]

This is a disgrace to our army and specifically to the military commanders responsible for the Kharkov direction. Was it necessary to regroup to the very borders? It is clear that the question is nowhere.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: Sailor

This is a disgrace to our army and specifically to the military commanders responsible for the Kharkov direction. Was it necessary to regroup to the very borders? It is clear that the question is nowhere.

Look at it from a different angle. And so we could mobilize and slightly ease the pressure of the consumer society? The threat should not be ephemeral. Cynical, I agree. Moreover, I don't think it was done on purpose. And life shook me, so to speak.. For many, all these years, Donbass has become the background of the news, almost like Iraq or Palestine between the block of news about the new asphalt in Ivanovo and the reading of the budget in the State Duma. And these are those who generally watched the news. Although there in the Donbass people speak Russian and have Russian surnames, but 1991 is farther and farther away. In the 90s, people fled to Serbia, the Balkans, without financial support. In general, I know a guy from Khabarovsk who told his mother this fall that he would go to war if the threat was directly to his Khabarovsk. And he served as a signalman. Served 7 years ago. Surprisingly, no notice was sent to him. I was told so.

[bukhach]

Do you think Khabarovsk will go to defend? From the Chinese? Rather, he will hand him over on a plate with a blue border, and what surprises you that he served for 7 years, he earned money and those who serve their homeland do not divide into parts. By the way, according to my observations, there are many such in the army, I mean those who earn.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: Buhach

Do you think Khabarovsk will go to defend? From the Chinese? Rather, he will hand him over on a plate with a blue border, and what surprises you that he served for 7 years, he earned money and those who serve their homeland do not divide into parts. By the way, according to my observations, there are many such in the army, I mean those who earn.

I doubt it will. He served a term 7 years ago, not a contract. The essence does not change of course.

[Chuck-norris]

And so we could mobilize and slightly ease the pressure of the consumer society?

What prevented her from spending it in the spring (on the wave of euphoria in society)? Well, when the skakly began their mass mobilization. Or did the General Staff not calculate the risks? And what were they doing? Did you pick your nose? And in the summer the problem was not visible? I wouldn't have to take my feet out of the Kharkiv region and hand over Kherson.

[Epaulettes]

What prevented it from being carried out at all before the start of the NWO, about a year in advance? And there would be time to prepare people and identify all the problems.

On what basis, you ask? Based on the threat of NATO invasion, of course. After all, even before February 24, we were told for many years that NATO was going to attack. That's the reason.

[Denis812]

Until February 24, we were told for 20 years that NATO was going to attack.
That is, in your opinion, it was necessary to mobilize and close the country 20 years ago?
or how?
You understand what's the matter, because it was not so difficult on February 24 to announce the mobilization of, for example, a million people.
It's not difficult at all.
Only here is the question - WHO will pay for it?
The answer is simple - citizens of the Russian Federation.
In general, it is not difficult to mobilize people as in the Second World War. Only now there will be nothing to eat and people will start to die of hunger.

And I'm sure. that those who are now shouting - they should have mobilized more earlier - would have just as well shouted that "Ah, now instead of salary they give me bread rations and canceled vacations, and in general, now I have to work in three shifts. The son was taken to the front without asking, and the daughter was taken to the sanitary battalion. ".

[Epaulettes]

I'm not saying it was necessary. And I'm not campaigning for mobilization.
I'm just discussing. Since it came to her anyway, it would be better to carry it out earlier.
The result is one thing - it happened anyway ...

[Denis812]

I have already asked the question above - before this when?
20 years ago? Or when Crimea? Or February 24th?
If everyone knew everything in advance, it might be better, but neither you nor Putin can read the future.

[Epaulettes]

Quote: Denis812

I have already asked the question above - before this when?
20 years ago? Or when Crimea? Or February 24th?
If everyone knew everything in advance, it might be better, but neither you nor Putin can read the future.

At the planning stage of the SVO.

[Denis812]

Well, you need to go to the General Staff with your foresights. And then there are all stupid mediocrity, so you will help them. Call here 8 [phone]

But in fact - try it in any game on your computer, in a strategy to predict in advance how the alignment will go. Even in the game it is never clear what can happen, but here is real life.

[Silver99]

This is not just a shame (((but a statement of a bluff. How to explain to people why they suffer, lose loved ones and property. longer range systems.

[Hey]

Was it necessary to regroup to the very borders?

I have only one rationale for this action. Since these areas were not originally included in the NWO zone, and were purely Russian regions. That, as is known from the decrees of the President, l.s. military service cannot be used in the NWO zone, but otherwise it can be used outside the zone, i.e. in the adjacent regions., which are the border areas. They do not need to pay for combat, in case of death, the payments are much less. And they cover the borders.
In a word, manipulators from MO. We are fighting here, we are not fighting here, we are wrapping fish here. Some laws are issued ostensibly out of good intentions, others who are sitting on a purse over gold wither away, regret allocating an extra penny, others have to dodge in order to comply with all the paragraphs. As a result, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Territories are shelled, people are killed, injured, infrastructure and the private sector suffer.

[Nevsky_ZU]

The Armed Forces of Ukraine, after the successful flight of Soviet jet UAVs 600 km to the operational depth, decided to develop the success of jet artillery at maximum speed, giving rise to informational reasons that they could reach far into the depths of Russia. Well, we can only increase the calibration of Ukraine in the 18th century. We won’t be able to intercept all shells and UAVs, tea is not the USSR with its air defense notch features in an overlap.

[Trapp1st]

we can only increase the calibration of Ukraine in the 18th century.

How should this protect the territory of the Russian Federation from shelling?

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: Trapp1st

we can only increase the calibration of Ukraine in the 18th century.

How should this protect the territory of the Russian Federation from shelling?

And read my comment to the end. No way. But you have to hit.

[Trapp1st]

No way. But you have to hit.

Structurally, rationally, logically ...)

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: Trapp1st

No way. But you have to hit.

Structurally, rationally, logically ...)

Well, what do you want to hear? Proposals to stop enemy air targets on our border? You know, the forces of our air defense are more objective air defense. Moscow to expose? Or maybe bring something back to the Russian Federation from Syria? In the 90s, in general, several dozen sets of S-300s were sold to the PRC. In the 300s, the Kazakhs were given as part of the concept of the mythical "joint air defense" in Central and Central Asia. How else would the Kazakhs not start secretly supplying Ukrainians with missiles and the S-XNUMX systems themselves. The only option left is to hit Ukraine hard.

[Silver99]

Maybe then it’s better to lose strategic bombers in battle, dropping 5 and 9 ton bombs on the heads of the adversary than to lose strategists at bases on the airfield ((((

[Epaulettes]

Quote: Denis812

Well, you need to go to the General Staff with your foresights. And then there are all stupid mediocrity, so you will help them. Call here 8 [phone]

But in fact - try it in any game on your computer, in a strategy to predict in advance how the alignment will go. Even in the game it is never clear what can happen, but here is real life.

And what about foresight? This is a banal prudence of several scenarios! That something could go wrong. And you need to be ready for this.

Or have you forgotten how we were told on February 24 that there would be no conscription of reservists, that it would not be required? Have you already forgotten how this very call went through, how many scandals there were?

This suggests one thing - this option was not considered at all in advance!

As for our General Staff ... The recent attacks on Engels speak of the level of its competence, and before that there was a lot more, so you are arrogant in vain.