Governor of Sevastopol: Ukrainian UAV shot down over the Black Sea

7
Governor of Sevastopol: Ukrainian UAV shot down over the Black Sea

Another unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of the enemy was shot down today over the Black Sea. This was announced by the Governor of Sevastopol Mikhail Razvozhaev.

As the head of the Sevastopol administration noted, in the morning the ship on duty of the Black Sea fleet The Russian Navy has spotted an enemy drone over the sea. He was shot down by the ship's air defenses.



Note that this is far from the first attempt to launch a UAV towards Sevastopol. The objects of the Russian naval base arouse legitimate interest on the part of the Ukrainian military. Repeatedly, air defense forces destroyed Ukrainian aircraft in the sky over the Black Sea. Drones, trying to attack warships standing on the roadstead in the Sevastopol Bay, then Belbek airfield.

It should be noted that the air defense systems in Sevastopol are working properly. Attempts of enemy attacks always end unsuccessfully for the enemy: drones shoot down. However, this is no reason to relax. Now the objects of the Crimean peninsula are one of the key targets of the Ukrainian army in terms of sabotage and provocation.

However, each such hostile action must also meet with a corresponding reaction from the Russian armed forces. It should consist not only in the destruction of drones, but also in the prompt delivery of retaliatory strikes against those Ukrainian targets from whose territory these drones can be launched towards the Crimean peninsula.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    7 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +4
      8 December 2022 10: 37
      One can partially agree with the last paragraph, only not retaliatory strikes, but preventive ones.
      1. +2
        8 December 2022 11: 15
        Quote from uprun
        only not retaliatory strikes, but preventive ones.

        And retaliatory ones too. Only the size of the retaliatory ones should exceed ten times. This must be officially declared
      2. 0
        8 December 2022 13: 03
        Quote from uprun
        One can partially agree with the last paragraph, only not retaliatory strikes, but preventive ones.

        To begin with, it would not be bad to decide on the brand of the drone. Lungs can take off without a runway. For some, 200 - 400 meters is enough. In fact, for each such blow, it is necessary to smash a 750 kV substation, and not just one. Yes, and without an arrival, they must also be smashed. The construction is already staggering in the power industry of Ukraine, it is necessary to finish it off to the end.
        1. +1
          8 December 2022 15: 59
          Quote: Hagen
          To begin with, it would not be bad to decide on the brand of the drone.

          I don’t know the brand of the drone, but the fact that the UAV was with a powerful charge is a fact. It banged during the crash so that the windows trembled. A very strong air wave .. And they shot down in front of Sevastopol .. Over the sea .. I also thought, at least the glass would not fly out ..
          1. -1
            8 December 2022 17: 19
            Quote: 30 vis
            The UAV was with a powerful charge fact

            On Gerani2 warheads 50 kg .... In general, if the drone is of the "kamikaze" type, they are launched at all "one way" and without a runway. By the way, if not laziness, write in which area of ​​Seva "glasses were trembling."
            1. +3
              8 December 2022 19: 13
              Quote: Hagen
              By the way, if not laziness, write in which area of ​​Seva "glasses were trembling."

              Seva I don't know. Sevastopol residents do not call their city that. Specifically, the Center, Shipbuilding, Northern, Wits and Kamyshi.
              1. 0
                8 December 2022 21: 07
                Better preventive and following Baku acts!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"