Military Review

The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant cannot be taken out of Russian control

20
The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant cannot be taken out of Russian control

The Russian Foreign Ministry commented on the statements of the head of the IAEA Rafael Grossi on the Zaporizhzhya NPP. Recall that last week Rafael Grossi announced "the need to create a demilitarized zone at the ZNPP and around it." Moreover, he put it as if some negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv were already underway, adding that "heavy weapons should be withdrawn from the territory of the nuclear power facility." At the same time, none of the employees of the IAEA Secretariat located at the station showed a single photo with “heavy weapons” of the Russian Federation on the territory of the nuclear power plant.


The Russian Foreign Ministry commented on literally every position in this statement by the IAEA director.

In particular, it was noted that Moscow is not conducting any negotiations with Kyiv on the issue of security around the nuclear power plant. Moreover, the addition sounded meaningful - no direct negotiations. It was noted that security issues are being discussed with the IAEA secretariat, and the secretariat itself "is trying to negotiate and interact with Kyiv."

Also, the Russian Foreign Ministry pointed out that there can be no withdrawal of the Zaporizhzhya NPP from Russian control, just as there can be no transfer of control over the nuclear power plant to a certain third party.

Earlier, we recall, Grossi's statement caused considerable concern among caring Russians. Many regarded his words about the “negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv” as a prologue to the fact that the Zaporizhzhya NPP could be “handed over to Kyiv”, which would quickly forget about the agreements on the “demilitarized” zone, eventually turning it into its usual militarized one. If you believe the statements of the Russian Foreign Ministry, then Russia is not going to leave control over the station.
Photos used:
ZNPP
20 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 6 December 2022 06: 37
    +12
    Grossi climbs out of his skin, how to put a pig on us, and like every Anglo-Saxon, he cannot do without lies against us ...
    In plain text I say ... he is a swindler and a swindler.
    1. Machito
      Machito 6 December 2022 07: 20
      +4
      What does the Zaporozhye NPP have to do with it?
      It is high time to demilitarize and denazify the IAEA. Arrest Grossi as a spy and solder him 25 years in Sunny Magadan.
      1. Plate
        Plate 6 December 2022 10: 16
        0
        Spy? For whom and how was he spying? I don't think he did or does anything like that. He has another job.
  2. Murmur 55
    Murmur 55 6 December 2022 06: 43
    +6
    Exactly Moscow and Kyiv are not conducting DIRECT negotiations, again a loophole has been left.
    1. Evil543
      Evil543 6 December 2022 07: 51
      -5
      They lead, they don't. Leave it, don't leave it. This we will know in time. They also talked about Kherson.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 6 December 2022 06: 45
    +7
    there can be no withdrawal of the Zaporizhzhya NPP from Russian control, just as there can be no transfer of control over the nuclear power plant to some third party.
    We can assume that the dots over I are placed. This is also a response to those fakes that appeared in various media about "the readiness of the Russian side to leave the ZNPP territory." And Grossi is suddenly planning to go to Moscow, but what will he talk about? He will probably talk about the fact that it is still impossible to establish who is shelling the ZNPP, and Russia simply needs to transfer the ZNPP to a third (read Ukraine) party in order to maintain security and move towards peace. The next six of the United States, heading an international organization, are trying to extort conditions that suit exclusively the Americans and, of course, Kyiv.
    1. Murmur 55
      Murmur 55 6 December 2022 06: 54
      +2
      rotmistr60 hi The United States and its vassals need to weaken Russia as much as possible on all fronts, human casualties, the economy, the position on the world stage, and then all means will be used.
  4. Stas157
    Stas157 6 December 2022 06: 50
    +1
    . It is noted that security issues discussed with the IAEA secretariat, and the secretariat "is trying to negotiate, to interact with Kyiv"

    And How?
    Helps with shelling?
    1. Murmur 55
      Murmur 55 6 December 2022 06: 57
      +4
      Stas157 hiand how will that help? And how is the IAEA different from the OSCE? For 8 years, the OSCE has not seen a violation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbass; these from the IAEA in UPOR do not see who is shooting at the station, what can you do if the "judges" are bought with giblets.
  5. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 6 December 2022 07: 01
    +4
    The problem is that we very often have discrepancies between words and concrete actions. Sometimes the Foreign Ministry makes one statement, the president's press secretary makes another, and in the end the president makes a completely different (sometimes unexpected for everyone) decision.
    1. Murmur 55
      Murmur 55 6 December 2022 07: 06
      +4
      Fedor Sokolov hi, because the people and refers to the official statement with distrust. If the president himself says that HIS press secretary is DRIVING a blizzard, how can there be trust in such a secretary?
      1. SKVichyakow
        SKVichyakow 6 December 2022 07: 10
        +1
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Fedor Sokolov hi, because the people and refers to the official statement with distrust. If the president himself says that HIS press secretary is DRIVING a blizzard, how can there be trust in such a secretary?

        Therefore, we do not need to drive a blizzard.
      2. Vladimir M
        Vladimir M 6 December 2022 07: 12
        +3
        It is unlikely that Navka's husband is carrying a gag, most likely he is "carrying a blizzard" at the direction of direct superiors to check the reaction to this or that action.
        1. Machito
          Machito 6 December 2022 07: 24
          0
          Here Navka's husband definitely cannot carry nonsense. Navka will not forgive this: he will leave him without borscht. You can't spend this Navka on chaff. Navka knows how much a pound of raisins is.
    2. evgen1221
      evgen1221 6 December 2022 07: 46
      0
      Or maybe the fact is that the head of the Foreign Ministry and the president are not obliged to totally report to Peskov on their deeds and intentions
  6. Fizik13
    Fizik13 6 December 2022 07: 10
    +2
    It is necessary to transfer American and European stations under the control of a third party.
  7. evgen1221
    evgen1221 6 December 2022 07: 44
    0
    How can they develop stereotyped thinking, so leave and that's it, and like woodpeckers incessantly.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 6 December 2022 07: 49
    +1
    The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant cannot be taken out of Russian control
    There will be many speculations ... the answer is given, concrete, there is nothing more to discuss.
  9. Yves762
    Yves762 6 December 2022 08: 41
    0
    ... what ...
    This is all of course interesting, but the answer depends on whether that side will be successful along the Zaporozhye-Melitopol vector ... request
  10. iouris
    iouris 6 December 2022 12: 05
    0
    The IAEA and the Foreign Ministry are not doing their job. First, the OSCE spied and gave target designations, now the IAEA. Expose and drive. Guterres too. The UN Secretary General should be a representative from Iran.