After the first and before the second. France between the world wars

89
After the first and before the second. France between the world wars
France in 1919–1939


"France, the first military power at the end of the First World War, was the first to be defeated in the Second"

- I heard that expression a long time ago. Why did this happen to a great world power, to a victorious power?



In this article, I will try to consider both the foreign and domestic policy of France, from 1919 to 1939, while forgetting June 1940 - the year of a shameful military defeat and subsequent capitulation. I will try not to dwell on the details of events, but will try to find the causes of this tragedy, which led France from the Victory Parade on the Champs Elysees on July 14, 1919 to the same Victory Parade on the same avenue on June 14, 1940. But already the Wehrmacht ...


June 14, 1940. Wehrmacht parade in Paris

Start over


France, along with its allies in the Entente - Great Britain and the United States, emerged victorious from the First World War, but it was exhausted. Both in the east and in the northeast, and these are the most developed areas, the country was devastated - its losses in this war were greater than those of other allied nations - 1,4 million deaths and 700 veterans left disabled for life.


French invalid

A tenth of the country lay in ruins, the factories and mines that represented the economic power of France were destroyed, and agricultural farms turned into a wilderness. Added to this was the high death rate of the civilian population and the loss of half of the commercial fleet.


French city ruins

About 150 billion francs were spent on the war, plus 14 billion francs invested by French citizens in Russia was lost after the Bolshevik revolution. In addition, over the years of the war, the amount of paper money increased five times, and the French economy suffered serious losses - about 20% of the total national wealth.


French city ruins

The demographic situation was also difficult for the French. The proportion of men called up for military service in France at the age of 19-49 was 80%. At the same time, during the war, the French infantry lost 22% of its combat strength - young and healthy men, and the largest losses, about 30%, were suffered by the youngest age group of soldiers 18-25 years old. At the same time, for every thousand called up, 168 were killed, that is, for every thousand young men aged 19-49, France lost 133 people, and if we count the losses for every thousand of all inhabitants of France, then the figure will approach 34.


French invalids of the war on a bicycle

Many of the dead men did not have time to start a family, and young French women were never able to get married. More than 600 French women were left widows, and some of the maimed French, returning from the front, lived in homes for the disabled or in villages specially built for them.


Orthopedic workshop for war invalids in France

In the early 20s, there were fifty-five women for every forty-five French men in their 20s and 30s. There were even years when there were no men from 19 to 30 years old at all - they simply did not have time to be born due to the fact that their future fathers were sitting in the trenches ...

And, of course, such hardships endured demanded from the people of France the determination to put their country on at least a pre-war track, in addition, the government had a growing expectation that France would begin to receive a lot of money as reparations from Germany. And so the news of the victorious end of the war caused general euphoria in the country ...


Celebrating the end of the First World War. France

Therefore, immediately after the end of the World War of 1914-1918, the problem of security found itself at the center of the political life of all France. All parties and political forces pinned their hopes in its solution on a peace treaty with Germany, the creation of the League of Nations, the preservation of the alliance with Great Britain and the United States, the expansion of the zone of strategic priorities in Central and South-Eastern Europe, and the active use of the resources of the colonies.


First meeting of the League of Nations

After the end of the war, as a result of the Paris Peace Conference, France received back Alsace and Lorraine, the coal mines of the Saar and, additionally, Syria and Lebanon, taken back from it during the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871), and in Africa - the former German colonies of Cameroon and Togo. The French delegation insisted on the dismemberment of Germany in order to forever deprive her of the opportunity to threaten France. However, her allies in the Entente opposed this demand with a united front - the dominance of France in continental Europe was not part of their plans.


Paris Peace Conference

The winner fears the hegemony of the loser. Fear of victory


Defeated Germany, with its population of 65 million people, which did not know foreign invasion, freed from the rule of the Hohenzollern monarchy, was strong in its industry, producing twice as much as its primordial enemy - France. Although Germany lost several of its provinces as a result of Versailles, all these French, Polish and Danish lost ethnic minorities were still sources of headache and ethnic conflict for her.


Germany after the end of World War I

Germany's actual severe post-war losses were in the coal resources of Lorraine and Silesia and in its overseas investments, which were confiscated by the victorious nations. As for the geopolitical encirclement of Germany, it has changed for the better - in the east, the newly created Poland replaced the collapsed Russian Empire, and in the south, after the collapse of Austria-Hungary, fragile states were formed, the same as the old Habsburg empire.


Krupp factories in Germany

In other words, in 1919, the geopolitical position of Germany indicated that the only power that could exercise its hegemony in Europe was Germany, even if defeated on the battlefield! The French, being centuries-old neighbors with the Germans, understood this, but the British and Americans refused their proposed solution, that is, the fragmentation of Germany into several states. And in this context, starting from G. Stresemann and ending with A. Hitler, the goal of Germany's foreign policy remained unchanged: to give its country a role in Europe commensurate with its power.


Steelworks in Essen

Hence the tragedy of French foreign policy from 1919 to 1939. The winner of the greatest war of all time - France, paradoxically, is guided by fears, because it is aware of its internal weakness. This fear requires the full implementation of the Treaty of Versailles, the occupation of the Ruhr in 1923 and the rejection of the disarmament requested by the Americans and the British.


Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr

France, during the peace treaty negotiations, tried with all her might to obtain guarantees of her security. For example, Prime Minister J. Clemenceau renounced his claim to the annexation of the Rhineland in exchange for an alliance with the United States and Great Britain, but the refusal of the US Congress to ratify this treaty left France isolated, left with no choice but to cling to full implementation of the Treaty of Versailles and build alliances with the new states of Eastern Europe - Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Romania.


Ruhr coal basin. Germany

British look


Unlike France, which fought the war with a firm conviction to defend its territory and its existence, Great Britain after 1919, frightened by the great loss of life suffered by it in the First World War, harbors doubts about its decision to enter the war, taken in August 1914. Some argue that she was dragged into a war that was not necessary due to the continental system of alliances in which she should not have been involved. In this context, the Protestant ethic of transparency and sincerity resonates deeply in British public opinion.

And only in 1938-1939, when the smell of war strongly in Europe, did the British public begin to wake up from this stubborn unwillingness to see the German danger.


Moreover, after the end of the Great War in 1919, the British diplomatic tradition began to recover, prescribing that no continental power should have hegemony. The only risk to Britain is France, with her victorious army occupying the left bank of the Rhine, and her satellite allies in Eastern and Central Europe.


The fact is that in 1920 the instinct of British diplomacy leads London to seek to limit the power of France. This reflex, which is the result of two centuries stories, exacerbated by the ambiguous feelings aroused in Britain by the Treaty of Versailles, which would have been too tough for Germany and which, one way or another, was doomed to revision.

The British view was biased and blind to the devastation suffered by France, but it was also factually wrong, as was proved by the rapid growth of the German economy after 1924, the impact of which was enormous. From an aggressor, Germany began to turn into a victim, and France was seen as an executioner, tormenting Germany.


The speed with which the British elite, out of regret or even remorse for having been dragged into this war, out of fear of a possible victory for Bolshevism in Germany, and out of prejudice against France, was ready to consider the Treaty of Versailles unjust.
Although the Franco-British agreement weathered storms from 1919 to 1932, it still stood. Each side was convinced that the other needed it to ensure security and stability in Europe.

Neighboring Italy


B. Mussolini dreamed of building a great "Italian Empire", the cornerstone of which was to be Ethiopia. He believed that France had given him carte blanche during the negotiation of a bilateral agreement of January 7, 1935, which settled the colonial disputes between the two countries. He noted that Britain had always shied away from answering this question, so on October 2, 1935, he attacked Ethiopia. This demonstrative aggression embarrassed London and Paris, who had to face the wrath of their publics at such a blatant case of a cruel and unjustified attack on a member of the League of Nations.


Ethiopian warriors

But none of the allied countries wanted to alienate a country that could threaten communications for Britain, and for the French was seen as a potential ally against the growing strength of Germany. In any case, in retrospect this gap seems inevitable: after Ethiopia came Spain (July 18, 1936).


Italian soldiers in Ethiopia

On December 22, 1938, Count G. Ciano, Italian Foreign Minister, notified France that Italy considered the treaty of January 7, 1935, by which conflicting colonial and maritime claims between Italy and France were settled, null and void.


Count G. Ciano - Minister of Foreign Affairs of Italy

It should be noted that in the Italian parliament, some hotheads even demanded Corsica and the Cote d'Azur. Under these circumstances, on January 1, 1939, Prime Minister E. Daladier went with an inspection of defense enterprises to Corsica and African possessions, upon returning from where he stated:

"Not an inch of territory will be ceded."

Relations with the USSR


In May 1935, France concluded a mutual assistance pact with the Soviet Union. This treaty provided that in the event of a threat or danger of aggression from any European state to France or the Soviet Union, the USSR and France would begin immediate consultations on the measures to be taken. In the event that France or the Soviet Union were subjected to unprovoked aggression by any European state, both France and the Soviet Union were to immediately come to each other's aid.


Signing of the Soviet-French pact

But the newly formed Laval government made the activation of the Franco-Soviet pact, concluded earlier, conditional on the consent of other guarantor powers and in July 1935 refused to respond to the Soviet proposal for negotiations between military headquarters. The Soviet-French pact lost all political and military significance. Anti-communism won in Paris.

Looking ahead, we can say that geography made a military agreement difficult, if not impossible, which was proved in the spring of 1939, when neither Poland nor Romania wanted to open their territory to the Soviet troops, who, therefore, could not no way to protect Czechoslovakia.

French foreign policy


From 1919 to 1932, France pursued two seemingly antagonistic policies in succession: the first until 1924 was based on the strict implementation of all post-war treaties that led to the Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr in January 1923, despite the opposition of London. And the second policy was based on the reintegration of Germany into the European mainstream.


Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr

In fact, the Ruhr crisis of 1923 showed the Germans that frontal resistance to the Treaty of Versailles was expensive, and the French that the use of force was very expensive. Galloping inflation on the one hand, and the crisis of the franc on the other, brought the two opponents to a compromise in 1924, when Britain and the United States sided with Germany in the issue of German reparations. Economic prosperity between 1925 and 1929 reduced political and social tensions in both countries.


Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr

In 1925, the Locarno Pact was signed, under which Great Britain and Italy guaranteed Germany's western borders with Belgium and France. This pact marked the beginning of the so-called Locarno Truce, and for the next two years relative peace reigned in Europe. Before World War II, writers often referred to the Locarno era as "years of hope"...


G. Stresemann, O. Chamberlain and A. Briand during the negotiations in Locarno

Locarno never brought about a permanent settlement of the Franco-German difficulties and did not lay the foundation for a lasting reconciliation. And it left many Germans and French dissatisfied. Moreover, it was meant that France had to submit to Great Britain. By yielding to the British demand to evacuate the Ruhr Valley and by inviting the British as guarantors of the Franco-German frontier, France completely abandoned any hope of a policy independent of Britain. Immediately after Locarno, both the British and the Americans began to put pressure on France to agree to a disarmament conference.


Broom seller in Montmartre, Paris, 1933

However, the crisis of 1929, which struck primarily Germany, nullified this fragile rapprochement. After the death of G. Stresemann, the political success of the Nazis, as well as the communists, who spoke on the topic of abandoning the Treaty of Versailles, marked the end of this Franco-German rapprochement.


A cheese seller with his goats. Paris, 30s

In France 1930–1931 appear in retrospect as beautiful sunsets of a great power. The gold reserve of the Bank of France has never reached such a high level at the time of the devaluation of the British pound sterling. The country was able to celebrate the greatness of the colonial empire during the triumphal exhibition of 1931. This year, France was still able to successfully block the project of the Austro-German customs union (September 3), supported by the United States and Great Britain. And in 1932, French Prime Minister Tardieu resisted US-British pressure to disarm. But 1932 is also the moment when the crisis begins to hit France.


French workers

The country has been torn into politically irreconcilable clans, the extreme right and the extreme left are flourishing, governments are falling one after another. It was in this context, when the French government had just resigned, that Germany announced the re-occupation of the Rhineland (March 7, 1936).


The entry of German troops into the Rhineland (March 7, 1936)

And this event is a turning point. In London, this is seen as the end of the Versailles system, a system no one believed in anymore. For France, this is a strategic disaster! But here's another problem - allied Belgium, sensing the approach of war, denounces its military agreement with France in order to declare its neutrality (October 14, 1936). The northern border of France is open.

In March 1936, France, which had been trying since 1919 to reconcile the reality of a devastated country with its aspirations for security, found itself powerless against the rise of Germany. And on the same day in March 1936, France renounces its status as a great power. Indeed, maddened by the rearmament of Germany, she is no longer able to find the strength to react, and weakened by a protracted political crisis, she refuses responsibility for her foreign policy to Great Britain ...


The kitchen of the Vitry-sur-Seine restaurant, Paris, 1930

Now French and British policy pursues the same goal - the protection of the Rhine. The conservative British governments (S. Baldwin and N. Chamberlain) consider the Soviet Union their main adversary, and in this capacity expect (and hope) a confrontation between two totalitarian enemies - the USSR and Germany. And the direction of Germany's ambitions to the East could contribute to this outcome.


While the politicians are negotiating, the Parisians are having fun...

From 1936 to 1939, French foreign policy followed that of the British. Whether it's the Spanish Civil War, when the Popular Front government refuses to help the left-wing government fight a military uprising backed by Germany and Italy, the Anschluss of Austria, or the Sudeten Crisis, London is in charge.


Flower seller in Paris, 1932

The policy of "appeasement" today causes heated debate, but also contempt. French foreign policy became a hostage to British foreign policy. This was the first but important step towards Munich, which became a symbol of unsuccessful politics. Nevertheless, it is also an unpleasant fact that this policy of the British and French authorities met with overwhelming public support, which was reflected after Munich in the triumph of N. Chamberlain on the balcony of Buckingham Palace and, to a lesser extent, when E. Daladier returned to Paris.


B. Mussolini, A. Hitler, E. Daladier and N. Chamberlain in Munich. 1938

After the shameful Munich, France lost not only the defensive advantage of 35 well-equipped Czechoslovak divisions, but also its alliance and prestige in Eastern Europe. Winston Churchill is said to have observed:

“France and Great Britain had to choose between war and dishonor. They chose dishonor and got war."


A. Hitler, E. Daladier and N. Chamberlain in Munich. 1938

In addition, "appeasement" had its own logic. In Britain, in addition to the fleet, since 1919 the armed forces have been neglected. The rearmament budget was adopted only in 1936 and 1937 and could not produce significant results until 1939. In the spring of 1938, Britain warned France that it could only deploy two divisions on the Continent in case of war with Germany.


Rally of the Popular Front

And instead of confronting external dangers as a single nation, France from May 1936 to April 1938 was involved in internal problems. At a time when Germany was feverishly releasing day and night weapon, French industrial enterprises were put out of action due to labor disputes, strikes and capital flight from the country.


Riots in the streets of Paris

On April 29, 1938, the Franco-British alliance was concluded. It was the largest event of its kind since World War I. This alliance provided not only diplomatic cooperation, but also the creation of a single command of the British and French military, naval and air forces. The King and Queen of England visited Paris in mid-July 1938. In the weeks that followed, however, tensions in Europe continued to escalate.

Domestic politics of France


Unfortunately, in the period between the two wars, the people of France suffered from the shortcomings of the political system of the Third Republic. There were too many political parties or groups in the country, resulting in very unstable governments. Intrigues have become commonplace. There was corruption all around. This state of affairs persisted in France even after Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 and began to heavily arm his country. The leaders of various political parties continued to fight among themselves and failed to prepare the country for war against Germany.


Paris in the 1930s

When the world faced an economic depression in 1929-1932, American President H. Hoover proposed a moratorium on the payment of reparations by Germany and all war debts by other countries, but this proposal did not meet with approval in France. This moratorium was only for one year, but the French feared that the payments would never be renewed again, and in fact they were completely stopped in 1932.


Carefree life in Paris in the 30s

Struck later than other states by the Great Depression, France since February 1934 has been plunging into a serious and protracted political crisis. The Third Republic turned out to be unable to respond to the political and economic challenges of the time, while Italy, Germany and the USSR offered new ways to solve political and economic problems.


Carefree life in Paris in the 30s

From 1932 to 1934, ministries alternated very frequently in France. Ultimately, Gaston Doumergue, who was President of France from 1924 to 1931, became prime minister in 1934. He tried to make some constitutional changes, but his proposals were rejected. He was replaced in this post in 1935 by Pierre Laval.

Laval was succeeded as prime minister by Léon Blum, a socialist and Jew who served as prime minister for a year.


French Prime Minister Leon Blum

As a leader of the Socialists, Blum was the first French prime minister of Jewish origin. His ministers were mostly socialists and radicals, while the communists refused his insistent invitation to participate in the work of the government. At the very beginning, a wave of sit-ins swept through the country, expressing the hidden dissatisfaction of the workers with the previous government and their determination to achieve what they considered justice.

The new premier convinced the industrial elite to raise wages immediately, which ended the strike. He then pushed additional reforms through parliament: the 40-hour week, paid holidays, collective bargaining, and the nationalization of the Bank of France. However, some reform bills stalled in the Senate, which remained far more conservative than the socialist Blum.


Parisian cafe

The social reforms carried out by Bloom's cabinet were very costly and controversial. Industrial production rose briefly and then slowed down again, unemployment began to creep up, rising prices compensated for rising wages, capital outflow began. When Blum tried to introduce currency controls, the French Senate overthrew his cabinet (June 1937).

He also retired. And his place was taken by E. Daladier, who was Prime Minister of France during the Munich Pact in September 1938.


French Prime Minister E. Daladier

With the arrival of Daladier's government, France again returned to the usual pattern of unstable centrist coalitions with socialists in opposition. The radical Daladier was prime minister from 1938–1940, and his finance minister, Paul Reynaud, halted most of the reforms initiated by the Popular Front and sought to rebuild the economy with more orthodox policies targeting industrialists and bankers.


Newspaper seller. Paris, 1930s

From Clemenceau to Laval, French politicians paid the greatest attention to the security of their country. For all the French, both left and right, there was only one question - the security of France. For them, there was only one enemy, and that was Germany.


Paris. 1930s

The new 40-hour work week imposed by the government on the employer prevented the French from competing with the vigorously armed Germany and Italy, who were working overtime in their factories. In the autumn of 1937, a series of atrocities revealed the existence of a "Secret Committee for Revolutionary Action" that received arms and money from Germany and Italy to set up a fascist government in France. The exposure of the conspiracy was put on hold, as too many people from the army and big finance were involved in it.

The Germans, on the other hand, worked day and night and completed the construction of the Siegfried Line along their western border. Before the shameful Munich agreement on September 5, 1938, Daladier canceled all holidays in the army and aviation and ordered all reservists to occupy the Maginot Line. On September 10, 1938, 12 soldiers were mobilized in France. Despite these preparations, France surrendered at Munich...

The French government also did not help the Republican government of Spain against General Franco and his associates. In the name of peace and non-intervention, all arms supplies to Spain were banned, and the left-wing Prime Minister Blum called on the powers to accept general rules of non-intervention.


Paris. 1930s

Republican supporters in Spain protested and demanded that planes be sent to Spain, but Blum was unmoved. The decision was fatal. Franco's victory drove more nails into the coffin of France's eastern alliances and left France even more discredited and weakened. It also strengthened the position of pro-fascist elements in France, whose slogan was

"Better Hitler than Blum the Jew."

Daladier, who became Prime Minister of France in April 1938, began to realize the seriousness of the situation, and he was given the right to administer decrees that dealt with France's finances. He succeeded in restoring confidence in the structure of the national economy by settling strikes, balancing the budget, and eliminating unemployment. An atmosphere of trust has been restored.

As a result, on March 19, 1939, the French government was given broad powers to issue decrees wherever necessary to respond to any emergency that threatened the security of France. France also experienced psychological and material changes. Munich came as a shock to them. France was unified in 1939, and by holding onto the Maginot Line, the people of France knew they had the most powerful army in Europe.

Daladier still managed to arouse enthusiasm among the inhabitants of France. On September 26, 1939, he ordered the dissolution of the Communist Party. When war broke out between Soviet Russia and Finland, Daladier Gamelin and Weygand prepared plans for war not against Germany, but against Soviet Russia.

Daladier resigned in March 1940 as prime minister, but returned as defense minister in Reynaud's new ministry.

Economy in the interwar period


Immediately in the post-war period, the government focused much of its energy on rebuilding the economy. An extensive program of rebuilding the war-torn areas was adopted, and the government had largely completed this task by 1925. And in order to somehow compensate for the loss of labor, immigration barriers were lowered, and two million foreign workers poured into the country.


Women workers in a factory

By the end of the 1920s, the strengthening of the national financial system began to show strong economic growth in France, and by 1927 French industrial power was already three times higher than the pre-war level. And interestingly, for the first time in a long time in the French industry there is an acute shortage of workers, because of which France, as mentioned above, began to import labor from abroad. This was not the case in Europe recovering its strength after the war! The structure of employment has also changed. In the post-war years, the urban population of France for the first time exceeded the rural population.


But by 1935, when the Great Depression hit France, industrial production had fallen to 79% of its 1928 level and exports to 55%. Registered unemployment hovered at less than 500, but that figure obscures the fact that many of the city's jobs on family farms are owned by relatives. In addition, the French exported most of their production. Immigrant workers lost their work permits and were forced to return home. And only in 000-1938, when war was about to break out, France barely returned to its pre-crisis level.

Cultural and scientific achievements


During the period described, the French also showed their great creative potential in pure science and made major discoveries in various fields. Among the most notable figures were Louis Pasteur in medicine, Pierre and Marie Curie in physics, Marceline Berthelot in chemistry, Henri Poincaré in mathematics, and Jean-Martin Charcot in psychopathology. In the social sciences, the work of Gustave Le Bon and Émile Durkheim has had a wide and enduring influence.

The new scientific and cultural spirit had parallels in both political thought and activity: in the syndicalist doctrines of Georges Sorel, in the activism of a minority in the labor movement, and in the resurgent nationalism that had strongly affected many French youth in the years leading up to the outbreak of the Great War. It also brought a return to the church and emotional patriotism. In the visual arts, a new generation of painters abandoned both realism and impressionism. These so-called Post-Impressionists were driven by a strong subjectivism, a desire to express the artist's inner vision and deeper emotions in various ways.

French armed forces before the war



Calculation of the 75 mm gun

By 1939, the French army numbered about 900 men. In addition to this number of privates, the French had 000 million reservists with some military training. And the vulnerability on the northeastern flank, in connection with the declaration of neutrality by Belgium, forced the French to build after the war along the entire Franco-German border a powerful fortification zone: from the Ardennes in the south to the English Channel in the north, where significant financial resources were invested. The idea of ​​its creation belonged to the then Minister of War Andre Maginot.


French army on parade

France had long been preparing for a possible German invasion. After seeing how the German troops made significant advances in attacks in 1870 and 1914, they built a large and supposedly impregnable line of defense in the period after the First World War. This defense included the Maginot Line, the natural features of the Ardennes forest, and the stationing of troops in prepared gun emplacements along the Belgian border.


Fortifications of the Maginot Line

France, having a population almost half that of Germany, by the beginning of the war still managed to put up an army roughly comparable to the Wehrmacht.


French colonial troops called up from Senegal

Line Maginot


The Maginot Line was an impressive series of defensive bunkers, gun emplacements and tank traps, stretching from the French border with Switzerland along the border with Germany to the Ardennes forest.


Armored bunker with a large caliber gun on the Maginot Line

The fortifications cut deep into the rock here were designed to prevent tanks from moving across the border. The bunkers were heavily fortified and could not be breached by Luftwaffe bombing, and had automatic weapons built into them that would have made a frontal infantry attack suicidal.


Turret with 135 mm gun

In 1939–1940 French strategists believed that the only attack options available to German forces were to attack the Maginot Line or invade through Belgium, as happened in 1914.


Triple casemate with 75 mm guns

For this, forces were deployed in two directions. A large number of soldiers stood guard in and around the Maginot Line, while the rest of the French troops were posted in northern France in defensive positions close to the Belgian border.


Vertically standing rails for anti-tank protection

Limited forces were transferred to the Ardennes region, as the strategists felt that the density of trees and semi-mountainous terrain made the area too difficult for a coordinated assault with tanks.

The French reserve was positioned to the north with the intention of moving out to support troops facing German forces along the Belgian frontier.

Air Force


By the beginning of the war, the French Air Force had 826 fighters and 250 bombers. This followed a move to increase the number of fighters made by the French government in 1938. This force was supported by 350 RAF aircraft that were sent to aid France in the event of a war with Germany. Combat missions against the Luftwaffe prior to the German invasion of France reduced the number of combat fighters available to 740.


French fighters

All French fighters had a lower speed than the German Me-109E, but were also more maneuverable. The most numerous fighter type on the French side was the Morane-Saulnier MS. 406, although by the beginning of the war it was already considered obsolete.

In addition, many air force theorists passionately believed in the strategic theory of the Italian General Giulio Douet (the so-called Douhet Douhet), which called for the destruction of the economic power of the enemy through massive bombing and the destruction of his infrastructure. On the other hand, the top leadership of the French army wanted the air force to serve as an auxiliary package rather than an independent unit...

During a visit to a military conference in London, the Chief of Staff of the French Air Force, Joseph Vuillemin, bluntly described the situation of the French Air Force as follows:

"During the war, our Air Force will be destroyed within a few days."

This harsh statement shocked all British commanders. They were well aware of Germany's quantitative successes, but believed that once the fighting began, the French would be able to contain Germany in the air.


French Air Force Chief of Staff Joseph (1883–1963)

Later that year, Joseph Vuyémins sent Prime Minister Edouard Daladier a personal letter reiterating that in the event of war, Germany would destroy the country.

Navy


The French navy at the end of the First World War was of considerable size, but after the signing of the Washington agreement in 1922 to limit the tonnage of the naval forces, it was sharply reduced, eventually forming a relatively small, but still quite strong fleet, though , with some of its inherent limitations that would later hinder its ability in World War II.


Submarine Surcouf

After World War I, the French navy focused on producing fast, heavily armed but lightly armored cruisers that could defend the coast of France.


Adolf Hitler came to power and began to build up the German military, the French government in response began to invest large sums of money in the modernization of its navy. This included the construction of large battleships such as Dunkirk, Strasbourg, Richelieu and Jean Bart.

And by the beginning of World War II, the French fleet was a powerful force. Between 1926 and 1939 two battlecruisers, seven heavy cruisers and 12 light cruisers were built. Their large battleships were either new or recently upgraded. He also had 71 destroyers and 76 submarines.

But the main weakness of the French fleet was the lack of aircraft carriers.


Battleship "Richelieu"

Let's try to summarize...


After a visit to France in early January 1940, Sir Edmund Ironside, Chief of the British Imperial General Staff, summarized his impressions of the French army as follows:

“I must say that at first glance I did not see anything wrong with her. All generals are tired people, although a bit old from our point of view. None of them showed self-doubt ... Will Blitzkrieg, when it comes, allow us to correct the situation if it remains the same? I must say that I don't know. But I tell myself that we must trust the French army. This is the only thing we can be sure of... Everything depends on the French army, and there is nothing we can do about it.”


Edmund Ironside

These were the eloquent words of a top British commander before the outbreak of World War II.

Now it's time to put together the elements of these significant pre-war years, which were briefly described above:

1. France was a democratic state, and in a democratic state the government listens to the will of its people. Public opinion in France was deeply pacifist, and she looked with horror at the prospect of a return to the unbearable suffering she had endured in the trenches. The same opinion was on the other side of the English Channel. Daladier, who pursued a conciliatory policy, was himself a veteran of Verdun, and he did not forget what he saw and experienced.

2. The mass media predicted massive aerial bombardments of cities, especially after the tragedy of Guernica (German air raid on the Spanish city of Guernica during the civil war on April 26, 1937).

3. Public opinion was divided over deep political tensions that overshadowed international issues. The extreme right movements admired B. Mussolini, supported F. Franco and pandered to A. Hitler. The Communist Party faithfully followed the instructions of comrade. Stalin even when they weakened the resistance to Nazism. The Third Republic seemed exhausted. Fear of a German invasion was replaced by fear of civil war. The right, formerly nationalists, became pacifists out of hatred and fear of communism, while the left was anti-fascist but still marked by the horrors of war.

4. A state cannot have a foreign policy that is inconsistent with its military strategy. The construction of the Maginot Line has always been criticized.

5. The Belgian betrayal was unpredictable.

6. Alliances with the countries of the Little Entente did not fit the French strategy, an army that hides behind the Maginot Line and has neither the intention nor the ability to save Poland. France had neither the means nor the desire to fulfill the provisions of its treaty of alliance with the countries of Eastern Europe.

7. The personality of Adolf Hitler became a decisive factor that no one could have predicted. Already at the end of 1938, he realized the wildest dreams of the German nationalists - at home he revived the economy and crushed the democratic parties, and in foreign policy he integrated ten million Germans into the Reich without firing a shot and made his country the first European power whose hegemony could be exercised from Denmark to Romania.

8. American isolationism. The United States hastily withdrew from the European theater without ratifying the Treaty of Versailles, without signing an alliance treaty with France, and without joining the League of Nations. And the post-war period was marked by bitter quarrels with their former allies, who were accused of not paying their war debts.

When the danger posed by Hitler became apparent, the US Congress voted several neutrality laws prohibiting any direct or indirect assistance to the belligerent, that is, France and Great Britain. And it is not surprising that Roosevelt did not respond to the desperate call for help from French Prime Minister P. Reynaud, sent to him in June 1940.

Thus, there were practically no prospects for defending France from Germany. The French cabinet fled from Paris, first to Tours and then to Bordeaux. P. Reynaud turned to America for immediate help, but to no avail. He eventually resigned and was succeeded by Marshal Petain, who made peace with Germany.

But that's a topic for another article...
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    9 December 2022 05: 55
    But that's a topic for another article...
    Well, we are waiting for another one. This is a detailed article, thanks.
  2. +8
    9 December 2022 05: 56
    Thank you.

    Victory first. Then the Versailles games. And then it turns out that the industry does not keep up with the German one.

    In general, pictures from the Arc de Triomphe: still a well-fed country, with a preserved way of life. But unstable, which was confirmed.
    1. +8
      9 December 2022 06: 32
      Good morning, Sergey!

      Something confused me with one photo of pre-war France - The carefree life of Paris in the 30s.

      In an enlarged version.

      And this, by any chance, is not “Willys MV”???


      But if this is so, then this "carefree life" is already the second half of the forties. laughing
      1. +4
        9 December 2022 08: 27
        Good morning, Constantine!

        As you have already established, the photo is later.
        And how the girls were supposed to grow during this time. Quite a different situation.
        1. +5
          9 December 2022 08: 35
          Girls... As one old Frenchman said, in "Young Lions", in my opinion:

          "France capitulates first at the front, then in bed."

          1. +4
            9 December 2022 09: 04
            On a historical scale, it is important to get into a good company.
            And there is a place for surprise: “Did the French also defeat us?” (With).
            1. +4
              9 December 2022 10: 01
              “Did the French defeat us too?”


              This is Keitel, if I'm not mistaken? smile

              1. +5
                9 December 2022 15: 12
                Yes. There were different versions of the wording. But the point is the same.
      2. +3
        9 December 2022 10: 15
        Something confused me one photo of pre-war France

        Correctly confused. This very famous photo of the very famous French photographer Roger Schall "The Kiss of Victory" was taken in Paris on May 8, 1945.
        1. Fat
          +4
          9 December 2022 11: 49
          hi You didn't confuse anything? Paris was liberated in August 1944
          The photo in the article is by Robert Doisneau, no less famous.
          This photo is 1944, August. Robert Duano. Kiss in Paris liberated / The liberation of Paris, August 1944. Robert Doisneau
          And this is his photo of 1944 ...




          1. +5
            9 December 2022 12: 13
            You haven’t messed up anything?


            No. Even in the book Paris au quotidien 1939-1945 - vu par Roger Schall there is this photo.
            And here you can see. https://loeildelaphotographie.com/en/roger-schall-the-kiss-of-victory-pp/
          2. +2
            9 December 2022 19: 14
            And this is his photo of 1944 ...

            Hello everyone, and hello to you too, Borisych. drinks
            I was interested in the first photo you posted. Obviously even before the Allies entered Paris, but in the foreground - STAN.
            That is, the British supplied the patriotic Parisians with swag from the planes?
            1. Fat
              +2
              9 December 2022 19: 43
              hi Greetings Nikolay. Looks like you're right, as usual. Battle of Paris from 15 to 25 August. And on the 26th there were already Parisian festivities with parades of allies and passages of prisoners along Parisian avenues ... Robert Doisneau was in the resistance at that time, he filmed a lot, but where is the reporting, and where is the "staging" can not be figured out now.


              1. +3
                9 December 2022 20: 21
                Robert Doisneau at that time was in the resistance, filmed a lot, but where is the reporting, and where is the "staging" can not be sorted out now.

                However, the Parisians armed themselves, and were determined to achieve liberation! soldier
                1. Fat
                  +2
                  9 December 2022 20: 48
                  There is an excellent selection of photos dedicated to the liberation of Paris. https://warspot.ru/3766-osvobozhdenie-parizha-v-fotografiyah
                2. +3
                  9 December 2022 21: 04
                  The French maquisars are a little more formidable than the "Norwegian partisans".
              2. +2
                9 December 2022 21: 02
                but where is the report, and where is the "staging" can not be figured out now.
                There are a lot of staged photographs and even photomontage (remember Yevgeny Khaldei) of that time.
                Thank you, Borisych!
            2. +2
              9 December 2022 20: 54
              They supplied it, they just forgot to train it. With this hold, "Sten" wedges "on one or two".
              1. +1
                10 December 2022 20: 39
                With this hold, "Sten" wedges "on one or two".

                Excuse me, but how should I keep it? Store up? How do you aim then? Well, this is not Owen's PP ... I think it's better to ask Uncle Kostya, he probably held this construction of pipes and fittings in his hands.
                1. +1
                  10 December 2022 22: 11
                  Excuse me, but how should I keep it?
                  Only for the forearm. It is not recommended to keep even the most reliable "Steyr" behind the store, not that it's average.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      9 December 2022 06: 54
      Quote: Sea Cat
      But if this is so, then this "carefree life" is already the second half of the forties

      I agree! The caption for the photo was exactly like "Life in Paris in the 30s." It's not me, but the Germans were smart. wink I took their Bundesarchive ...
      1. +2
        9 December 2022 07: 09
        It's clear. As the saying goes, "trust but verify". smile
        1. +2
          9 December 2022 10: 20
          It's clear. As they say, "trust but verify"

          This photo is from the photographer's personal archive. The author's version of the Bundesarchive raises strong doubts.
          1. +4
            9 December 2022 10: 53
            It stores not only official...
            -------
            1. +3
              9 December 2022 11: 27
              From 1945 to 1950, the Bundesarchiv did not exist as such and did not function.
              1. +4
                9 December 2022 11: 47
                Quote from Passeur
                From 1945 to 1950, the Bundesarchiv did not exist as such and did not function.

                It has existed since the days of the Kingdom of Prussia. Under a different name. It also existed in the GDR, however, already the former. Also under a different name. It exists even now. Now new technological winds are blowing there and information is stored on digital media.
                1. +3
                  9 December 2022 11: 59
                  I know the history of the Bundesarchiv well, I had to work with him. But in 1945, due to certain circumstances, the archive "closed". He resumed work in 1950, the Allies returned the documents in 1952.
                2. +2
                  9 December 2022 19: 21
                  It exists even now. Now new technological winds are blowing there and information is stored on digital media.

                  Soooo ... and here is the esteemed author. N. Kuntsev - Nikolai, apparently? drinks
                  Article shine. good For which thanks from all. Yes
                  May I have a friendly remark? drinks
                  Last year I wrote a 20-page description of the two days of the future Emperor Paul. I was advised to break it into pieces. In general, our colleagues on the forum "went". There were three articles.
                  Too much text is already a story, a story. The article should ideally be 3-4 pages.
                  I wish you new creativity on the pages of the site - for the pleasure of honest people. Yes Everyone liked it. But you can divide it into parts - then you will enchant our attention for two or three days. And the work is exceptional, thank you. good
                  With respect, Nicholai drinks
                  1. +4
                    9 December 2022 19: 41
                    The article should ideally be 3-4 pages

                    It came to my mind too. But you can't roll back...
                    1. +3
                      9 December 2022 20: 19
                      It came to my mind too. But you can't roll back...

                      Nothing wrong! good But it's a great idea for the future. Yes You will please us for three whole (Three, Karl!) days. Look what a good forum turned out!
                      These are my entries from last year. At first there was one article, then, on the advice of respected people, it was divided into three. hi
                      https://topwar.ru/185632-shagi-imperatora-gatchinskij-gamlet.html
                      https://topwar.ru/185634-shagi-imperatora-dolgozhdannyj-tron.html
                      https://topwar.ru/185636-shagi-imperatora-bednyj-bednyj-pavel.html

                      I haven't posted anything else, unfortunately. There are a lot of preparations, materials - eat with your ass for both buttocks, but there is no desire, alas ... request
                      Is that your name Nicholas? I'm used to addressing good people by their first names. drinks
                      I wish you to please us with articles again. It turned out very well, exceptionally!
                      With respect, Nicholai. drinks
                      1. +2
                        9 December 2022 20: 27
                        Is that your name Nicholas?

                        Yes. But on the forums it is more convenient to communicate by nickname ...
                      2. 0
                        10 December 2022 20: 35
                        Yes. But on the forums it is more convenient to communicate by nickname ...

                        As you please! I prefer first names. drinks
                      3. +1
                        10 December 2022 21: 13
                        I prefer names

                        Please, can you name...
                      4. +1
                        10 December 2022 21: 20
                        As you please! hi
                        Once again I repeat: the article is brilliant. Gorgeous. good
                      5. +1
                        18 December 2022 23: 47
                        Quote: Pan Kohanku
                        As you please! hi
                        Once again I repeat: the article is brilliant. Gorgeous. good

                        Just a lot of pieces poor translation and not read in its entirety.
            2. Fat
              +4
              9 December 2022 12: 00
              hi Don't even think of making excuses. Colleague Passeur was too hasty with his "revelations"
              Sincerely
              1. +2
                9 December 2022 12: 16
                Which one of us was in a hurry is a big question.
                1. Fat
                  +4
                  9 December 2022 13: 37
                  In 1944, the first publication of the book "Paris under the boot of the Nazis. Evidence in the images of four years of occupation" was published. This book, with a preface by General de Gaulle, edited by Raymond Chall, is supplemented by photographs by Roger Chall, Robert Doisneau, Roger Parry, Jean Seberger, André Papillon, Pierre Jahan, Maurice Jarnoux. This is where our "different interpretations" come from. smile
    4. +5
      9 December 2022 06: 55
      Quote from Korsar4
      Victory first. Then the Versailles games. And then it turns out that the industry does not keep up with the German one.

      For the French, a defeat would be better than such a Victory!
      But in 1940 they learned these lessons well ...
      1. +7
        9 December 2022 07: 45
        The French should have been more serious about preparing the army for WWI.
        In terms of propaganda, they so set up the population for revenge for the Franco-Prussian war that the population was thirsty for war!
        But the army itself was not ready for the war that took place in 1914!
        Many "xperds" speak negatively about the domestic rifle, but they forget to compare it with the main rifle of the French army!
        And constant hopes for many days of artillery shelling and crowded waves of infantry contributed to gigantic losses.
        But the Germans did the same!
        The post-war "throwing" of the French military in almost all areas of weapons did not increase, but only weakened the combat capability of the army.
        Plus there were political squabbles and economic crises!
      2. +8
        9 December 2022 08: 29
        There are many examples of Pyrrhic victories. But the defeat of France in the First World War is already an alternative history.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +6
    9 December 2022 07: 39
    A little about the small arms of the French army of that period.



    Hotchkiss M-1922
    St. Etienne Mle 1907
    Hotchkiss Mle 1914

    Hotchkiss M-1930

    Of course, there were also barrels in the infantry, and aviation, and tank, but this is a topic for a separate article.

    And thanks to the author for this article. smile
    1. +5
      9 December 2022 08: 55
      And ten models of tanks!
      And each one needs spare parts.
      Aviation has its own "throwing".
      1. +4
        9 December 2022 10: 03
        Hi Aleksey. smile

        How do you like their ships? I mean surface, "Surkuf" is some kind of underwater nonsense. laughing
        1. +3
          9 December 2022 11: 39
          Ships are like ships. Only the French fleet did not show itself. He accepted surrender, and later drowned himself in Toulon or was defeated by the British in the ports of North Africa!
      2. +3
        9 December 2022 11: 20
        And ten models of tanks!

        Even eleven. AMC 35, Char 2C, Char B1, Char D1, Char D2, FCM 36, Hotchkiss H35, Renault FT, Renault R35, Renault R40, SOMUA S35.
        However, the French are not leaders.
        T-18, T26 in two versions, BT-2, 5, 7, T-37,38,40, T-28, T-34, T-35, KV-1,2. The total is fourteen.
        1. +2
          9 December 2022 11: 35
          The T-27 tankette and the T-24 tank were also missed by several small-scale floating ones.
          And in time, the French had "stagnation".
          In the USSR, immediately after the end of the Civil War, they were preoccupied with the development of tanks, then the French "sat" on the gigantic stocks of FT-17s and in the first post-war years they only tried to follow the path of modernization of these 17s!
          And the French tank industry woke up only by 1936.
          And endless competitions and "throwing" of the military began regarding the reservation, armament and speed of the tanks they desired!
          And the division of the Ground Forces into infantry and cavalry added chaos to the development and production of vehicles that differ slightly in performance characteristics!
          The infantry chose Renault-35, and then "squeezed out" Hotchkiss-35/39 from the cavalrymen. And initially the Hotchkiss project was abandoned by infantrymen with large shoulder straps!
          1. +3
            9 December 2022 11: 40
            Quote: hohol95
            And the French tank industry woke up only by 1936

            Why do those who were going to sit their asses behind the Maginot Line need a tank industry? wink
            1. +3
              9 December 2022 11: 56
              They "propped up" their Maginot line with thousands of FT-17s!
              But by 1936, it turned out that this tank was "somewhat outdated and worn out."
              1. +1
                9 December 2022 19: 23
                But by 1936, it turned out that this tank was "somewhat outdated and worn out."

                However, with his outdated Puteaux cannon, they were also worn on subsequent models, like a fool with a written sack. EMNIP, they tried to lengthen the 37-mm barrel only on the H-39. I can be wrong. drinks
                1. +2
                  9 December 2022 19: 48
                  Yes. Initially, that's how it was.
                  And even the medium D2, which "grew" out of a task for a light tank, was originally armed with a "short-barreled" 47mm SA34.
                  Then it was replaced by the "long-barreled" SA35, like the B1 and S-35.
                  But that didn't help either...
                  "Of the 84 Renault D2s received by the French army, 21 were destroyed in battle, 26 broke down and were abandoned on the battlefield, 12 broke down and were evacuated. 12 tanks were already abandoned during the evacuation. The Germans evacuated 12 tanks, they took 9 more vehicles from the French following the armistice."
                  The army received only 84 tanks of this type!
                  "Colonel de Gaulle's workhorse"
                  warspot.ru
                  The first of 50 tanks with a "short" gun were sent to the troops on May 9, 1936, and the last on February 23, 1937.
                  The second batch of 50 vehicles with a "long" gun began to enter the troops from the end of March 1940!
                  Before the preparation of the plant for evacuation, 37 tanks were manufactured, and 34 tanks went to the troops, respectively!
                  Information from articles from warspot.ru and Yuri Pasholok's Zen page.
                  1. +1
                    9 December 2022 20: 22
                    Information from articles from warspot.ru and Yuri Pasholok's Zen page.

                    The pseudo-itorist Beshanov (in 2001) wrote that the Germans used the Somu S-35 during the assault on the Brest Fortress.
                    1. +1
                      9 December 2022 20: 35
                      The Teutons in May 1941 decided to use the S-35 to arm their armored trains.
                      Pz.Kpfw.35 S (f) - 3 tanks each were included in armored trains No. 26, No. 27 and No. 28, 2 tanks each were included in armored trains No. 29, No. 30 and No. 31.
                      Armored trains N27 and 28 took part in the attack on the Brest Fortress.
          2. +2
            9 December 2022 11: 41
            I did not take into account tankettes, armored vehicles and models of tanks that did not participate in hostilities. The French would have had more then, too.
            1. +3
              9 December 2022 11: 54
              In our country, almost all armored vehicles were thrown into battle.
              And the French sent some of the "unsuccessful" models to the colonies and they did not participate in battles in the metropolis.
              1. 0
                10 December 2022 20: 43
                And the French sent some of the "unsuccessful" models to the colonies and they did not participate in battles in the metropolis.

                These were armored cars. Incl. and outdated. However, the British in Southeast Asia also used armored vehicles almost from the time of WWI.
                And the pre-war French tank park was enough for the first Arab-Israeli war. The Arabs went into battle in Renaults and Hotchkiss ... We once had a rich discussion on that war with Albert-Krasnodar.
                1. +1
                  10 December 2022 21: 41
                  Of the 160 D1s, 145 were sent to Tunisia. 15 were left as training yashin.
                  In Tunisia, 3 battalions were flied at D1.
                  In 1940, one of the battalions was transferred to the metropolis and he fought quite well.
                  40mm armor held Teutonic 37mm armor-piercing shells. But the equipment was already worn out and the Germans pressed on. The battalion also lost vehicles in battle, but the main part was due to technical breakdowns.
                  The tanks that remained in Tunisia were transferred to Algeria, where in 1942 one of the battalions clashed with Yankee tanks - the score: 14 D1 against one 75 mm GMC M3 and one Light Tank M3.
        2. +4
          9 December 2022 18: 49
          However, the French are not leaders.
          T-18, T26 in two versions, BT-2, 5, 7, T-37,38,40, T-28, T-34, T-35, KV-1,2. The total is fourteen.

          They acted by the "poke" method until they ran into the "Thirty-four". smile

          Good evening, colleague! hi
          1. +2
            9 December 2022 22: 25
            Good evening! Yes, I would not say that by the "poke" method. In principle - in line with global trends. True, the trends were tortuous, some countries, like France, did not get out of these meanders, but in general, all "tank countries", with the exception of Germany, produced a lot of designs. Germany stands out in this respect.
            1. +2
              9 December 2022 22: 53
              some countries, like France, did not get out of these meanders


              And despite the fact that he made the Reno FT ... Strange. request
              1. +3
                9 December 2022 23: 11
                Yes, actually, nothing strange. The French generals in the interwar period were never able to develop a coherent doctrine for the use of tanks. In such cases, tank building is powerless.
                1. +4
                  9 December 2022 23: 20
                  As always, everything depends on the generals, it’s just amazing how some of them (and there are plenty of them in any army) get to the heights of power. No, it is clear, of course, how and in what way, but it is still surprising. belay
                  1. +1
                    9 December 2022 23: 40
                    Here, too, paradoxical things sometimes turn out. For nine pre-war years, General Gamelin led the French General Staff. He earned the rank of general not on the floor, was considered an intellectual and was respected as a military leader even among the Germans. And led France to a military disaster.
                    1. +4
                      9 December 2022 23: 58
                      So what, after all, was the reason for the complete unwillingness of the French to fight? But there were people like De Gaulle, of course, a complex person, but he didn’t stop fighting the Germans and brought France to the camp of the victorious countries (despite Keitel’s irony)))))
                      1. +3
                        10 December 2022 00: 30
                        So what, after all, was the reason

                        Wow, you ask questions. The author wrote a whole article on this issue.
                        If I try to briefly formulate the reasons, I see three - the failure of French intelligence, incorrect strategic planning and the failed leadership of the army during the hostilities. If you unfold these theses, you yourself understand that it is not realistic within the framework of comments.
                      2. +4
                        10 December 2022 00: 43
                        It is clear that two words cannot explain this. But, in my opinion, a lot still depends on the individual. At that time there were enough of them everywhere, even in France there was De Gaulle.
                        But "about now" and there is no desire to shake the air. request
                      3. +3
                        10 December 2022 00: 57
                        De Gaulle wrote a lot before the war, but did not decide anything. In 1936, he was not even awarded the next rank of colonel due to an allegedly poor track record.
                      4. +3
                        10 December 2022 01: 05
                        He was also lucky that he lived in France, in our country in the same years, many generals were completely "unlucky".
                      5. +1
                        10 December 2022 01: 11
                        I noticed that many here are nostalgic for those times.
                      6. +2
                        10 December 2022 01: 21
                        I knew one elderly convict, so he seriously missed the zone. Someone, apparently, without a thorn and a guard can not imagine another life. I will not go into details, and so everything is clear.
  6. +4
    9 December 2022 08: 48
    Interesting article. But the useless cruising submarine "Surkuf", which had already sunk by that time (by the mid-30s), is of no use here. But in general, respect to the author.
    1. 0
      9 December 2022 09: 50
      She died under unclear circumstances, presumably on February 18, 1942.

      If the wiki doesn't lie to us.
      1. +1
        9 December 2022 16: 40
        Looks like he's lying. I read from Shapiro that she did not live to see WWII. I can’t find the book, I started the repair, and this author had a series of books about the fleet - “The Fastest Ships”, “The Biggest Ships”, “The Heart of the Ship”. Books of the publishing house "Shipbuilding", 80s.
  7. +1
    9 December 2022 09: 16
    France, along with its allies in the Entente - Great Britain and the United States, emerged victorious from the First World War, but it was exhausted. Both in the east and in the northeast, and these are the most developed areas, the country was devastated - its losses in this war were greater than those of other allied nations - 1,4 million deaths and 700 veterans left disabled for life.


    Poor unfortunate France. However, depending on whom to compare. Compared to Russia? What losses, demographic and material, did our country suffer as a result of the First World War and Civil War?
    But somehow our country turned out to be much more resilient and resilient, stronger both in body and spirit.
    Although they did not mobilize before the war and did not receive reparations following the results of the previous one (World War I).
    Well, we had socialism and I.V. Stalin with the CPSU (b). And the French have capitalism, rentiers, generals not repressed, who prepared the army "very well" for war, and democratically elected politicians who also prepared their country "very well", pursuing a very far-sighted and thoughtful foreign policy. While the Wehrmacht was already beginning to concentrate its divisions on the border, the local strategists were preparing a military operation against the USSR (the destruction of oil fields in the Caspian).
  8. +3
    9 December 2022 09: 22
    Quote: Aviator_
    But the useless cruising p / l "Surkuf"

    Several guns, torpedoes, plus a plane on board? Why is she useless?

    Quote: Aviator_
    already sunk by that time (by the mid-30s)

    Maybe I'm wrong, I'm writing from memory, but it seems to have been part of the Fighting France

    Quote: Aviator_
    But in general, respect to the author

    For "respect" - thank you!
    1. +5
      9 December 2022 11: 13
      Quote: Luminman
      Several guns, torpedoes, plus a plane on board? Why is she useless?

      Redundancy of the main caliber for typical submarine targets. The mass and volume spent on it should have been directed to improving the underwater qualities of submarines, which, as WWII showed, are the main ones.
      For the same Yankees, their large artillery submarines found the use of their artillery except in raiding operations.
      And most importantly - who needs one unique submarine in a big war? It is better to build several typical averages for its price. Although ... for France, any solution will like a dead poultice ©.
      - If I had taken the pike with the third move, then the dead man would have taken not 4, but 6 bribes on a minuscule.
      - Come on, and so it turned out well.
      © smile
      1. +3
        9 December 2022 11: 29
        Quote: Alexey RA
        And most importantly - who needs one unique submarine in a big war?

        Such a boat simply had no one to fight with. Britain is an ally, and Germany did not have such significant maritime traffic. Just a display of French fighting power...

        P.S. But Dönitz in the Atlantic, such a device would probably come in handy ... wink
        1. +4
          9 December 2022 11: 47
          Quote: Luminman
          P.S. But Dönitz in the Atlantic, such a device would probably come in handy ...

          I wang that the Germans, most likely, would have removed 8 "and put the usual 15-cm, or even 10,5-cm. For a single transport is no longer necessary, but climbing onto a submarine on a convoy - you have to be a great optimist For one 76-mm hit in a strong hull - and the submarine has a great chance of losing its ability to dive. Plus, something tells me that no SUAO will help in the Atlantic 8 "on a submarine.
          1. +2
            9 December 2022 11: 53
            Quote: Alexey RA
            climb on a submarine on a convoy - you have to be a big optimist

            Perhaps you are right. Although there are still decoy cruisers masquerading as merchant ships. Against such a "dessert", a large caliber would certainly come in handy ...
  9. +5
    9 December 2022 09: 57
    France, especially Paris, has changed from a lot of things by the age of 20-30. For example, women who replaced husbands in families during the war no longer wanted to return to a subordinate position. Front - line soldiers , invalids and cripples have found out that the old world is collapsing in everyday life and in families . And since the family is the basic cell of any society, this was passed on by the baton of the "funeral" of old morality, old art, old literature, etc. for the entire French society. The men who passed through the trenches also then considered that they were also capable and that they should also be applied to the creation of a new morality-anti-morality, a new art-anti-art, etc.
    We should not forget about the new emigrants who then flooded into Paris from Europe in whole diasporas. Trains to Paris every day brought new crowds of foreign emigrants - Italians, Russians, Poles, Jews. They often settled as compatriots and worked as those who the local Parisians would have to work if there weren’t many emigrants - taxi drivers, dishwashers, janitors, lackeys, seamstresses, governesses, singers in taverns ... well, as now, for example in Moscow, with an influx emigrants Uzbeks, Tajiks and Ukrainians. And the native Parisians then went crazy in cafes and clubs, like the current native Muscovites. So the substitution in family relationships for anti-moral ones, in culture for anti-culture, in art for anti-art - in Russia, compared to France, it was seventy years late, because Russia had to go through the nineties of the last century, which was no less scary than the First World War War ...
    1. +7
      9 December 2022 15: 16
      Maugham's novel "Christmas Holiday" dates back to the period before the Second World War. And already the presence of emigrants changed the picture.

      This is how we try to catch the time: according to Maugham, according to Remarque, etc.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +5
    9 December 2022 13: 08
    "A state cannot have a foreign policy that is inconsistent with its military strategy" (c)
    Golden words!
    After reading the article, an association immediately arose - White starts and wins.
    Although there are a lot of letters, the article is really good.
    Respect to the author.
  12. +2
    9 December 2022 14: 50
    If you Forget the capture of Polish Poland, then yes, then France was the first to fall, if we discard Czechoslovakia, including, as well as the countries of France's neighbors. My father said that if Germany did not need France, then there would be no war against the USSR. The Anglo-Americans knew what to do. The Germans could close up Naglichan in one fell swoop, but then there would be no example for the Germans.
  13. 0
    9 December 2022 16: 17
    ... and the traditional Krupp 10-cm tower installation at the Kronprinz Festa near Strasbourg was attributed to the Maginot Line.
  14. 0
    11 December 2022 17: 12
    Thanks to the author for the voluminous text and many photos.
    Not being a historian, even an amateur, not everything is consistent with personal ideas.
    But the sheer amount of information...
    Thank you!
  15. 0
    12 December 2022 07: 06
    Good article. Informative. Thank you author. I read it fluently. Beautiful photos, allow you to plunge a little into the atmosphere of those years. We are waiting for your articles.
  16. +1
    13 December 2022 04: 45
    If in an even more concise form:

    1. Wars are not won by defense. France did not want to fight. Her defense policy was precisely defensive. And the revanchist German strategy was offensive.

    2. The split of society. As a result, for France, World War II also became a civil war. The one they were so afraid of. And yet they got it - in addition to an external invasion.
  17. -1
    15 December 2022 05: 11
    But it seemed to me that the article was clearly translated - in terms of speed and phrases that are completely uncharacteristic of the Russian language.
  18. 0
    20 December 2022 01: 00
    the article does not say about the size of France's gold reserves .....[media=http://youtu.be/LV9TFdFhx3o]