Lukashenko called the main goal of the Ukrainian regime to draw NATO into an open conflict with Russia

15
Lukashenko called the main goal of the Ukrainian regime to draw NATO into an open conflict with Russia

The Ukrainian authorities are trying to draw the troops of the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance into an armed conflict with Russia. This was stated by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, who noted the increase in the number of provocative actions of the Ukrainian side near the state border of Ukraine and Belarus.

According to Lukashenko, the recent Ukrainian missile falls on Polish territory also testified to this goal of the Ukrainian regime. The President of Belarus also noted that the security forces are still managing to restrain the attempts of a potential adversary to provoke the use of military force against Minsk. However, it is necessary to ensure that no aggression is being prepared against Belarus, which requires constant monitoring of the situation on the border.



Western countries are also building up their military presence and improving military infrastructure. Measures are constantly being taken for the operational and combat training of troops near the borders of Russia and Belarus. This leads, according to Lukashenka, to a further aggravation of the situation both in Belarus itself and in the region as a whole.

Lukashenka also drew attention to the calls of the so-called opposition to seize power in Minsk by force of arms, to commit terrorist acts on the territory of Belarus. Lukashenka called the oppositionists themselves extremists and traitors to the Belarusian state and people, as they openly call for strikes against Belarusian infrastructure, forgetting that not only their compatriots, but also their own relatives live in Belarus.
  • kremlin.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    December 1 2022
    Editors, please coordinate your actions somehow. There was already an article on this topic below: "Lukashenko: An increase in the number of provocations has been noted near the border of Belarus." Why offer the same topic for discussion twice?
    1. -1
      December 1 2022
      Lukashenko called the main goal of the Ukrainian regime to draw NATO into an open conflict with Russia
      somehow ... so-so "main goal", then it will come to nuclear weapons. who needs it?
      1. -1
        December 1 2022
        Quote: Aerodrome
        Lukashenko called the main goal of the Ukrainian regime to draw NATO into an open conflict with Russia
        somehow ... so-so "main goal", then it will come to nuclear weapons. who needs it?

        Everything is logical. The main goals of Ukraine are determined (not always advertised) by the United States.
        The goal-setting of the United States is quite traditional: maximizing the profit from initiating and maintaining conflicts around the world, with the exception of its own territory and the immediate environment.
        Both geographically and mentally.

        Lukashenka sees many things correctly.
        It seems because he does not look at the world through the prism of his personal pocket.
  2. 0
    December 1 2022
    Someone fills the column ....., the people have already spoken a little earlier on this topic. Sorry.
    1. 0
      December 1 2022
      Quote from uprun
      Someone fills the column ....., the people have already spoken a little earlier on this topic. Sorry.

      Passing by (detour) is not prohibited.
      Use it. hi
  3. -4
    December 1 2022
    Somewhere I have already seen this news ... Probably here a couple of hours earlier ..
  4. -4
    December 1 2022
    Since the old man said, then the matter is clearly not clean.
    The old man himself is a fan of either shooting at the border after the elections, then concentrating migrants there, then Russian troops (and he didn’t recognize Crimea and the LDNR, so ....)

    Naturally, with this, the neighbors are urgently armed.
    HPP in action.
    1. 0
      December 1 2022
      Quote: Max1995
      Since the old man said, then the matter is clearly not clean.
      The old man himself is a fan of either shooting at the border after the elections, then concentrating migrants there, then Russian troops (and he didn’t recognize Crimea and the LDNR, so ....)

      The "father" has enough sanity.
      The entire Baltic states, if it were not for the father, would have been on fire for a long time, and our Baltic regions too.
      You shouldn't have to drink. and say thank you. hi
  5. +1
    December 1 2022
    Whatever hawks there may be, there are still few fools there. They will fight to the last Ukrainian, unofficially they will launch the Poles, and also to the last Pole, but they themselves will not get into a fight. Businessmen, they need to earn money.
    1. 0
      December 1 2022
      Quote: 28st region
      They will fight to the last Ukrainian, unofficially they will launch the Poles, and also to the last Pole, but they themselves will not get into a fight. Businessmen, they need to earn money.

      And not only the Poles will be released.
      But so much the better: we will not be alone in "aggressiveness" and annexations. hi
  6. -3
    December 1 2022
    Well done what Aleksander Grigorych! I finally read what Russian diplomacy has been saying since about April!
    1. 0
      December 2 2022
      in general, he only tracks what everyone knows for a long time ... He is a coward ..
  7. +1
    December 1 2022
    As the military commissar from the "DMB" said: "It's creepy, but nothing." That is, we are not in the news this news
  8. +1
    December 1 2022
    The so called opposition in BelaRus, we all know very good that USA is financing such a clowns to destabilize BelaRus and President Lukashenko. USA should, for a change, mind their own business instead putting their nose in Eastern Europe and Middle East all the times. Look what USA did to poor Ukraine, it turned it to Nazi russophobic sh*thole. I really hope the same doesn't happen to Belarus. My big support to Lukashenko and his efforts to neutralize USA spies and their provocations.
    1. +1
      December 1 2022
      You are right, of course. I think so too. hi

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"