Lavrov commented on the information disseminated by Western media about Russia "begging for negotiations"

68
Lavrov commented on the information disseminated by Western media about Russia "begging for negotiations"

The reports that Russia is asking for negotiations with Ukraine that have appeared in the Western information space are lies. This was the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov.

Russia, according to the head of the diplomatic department, never asked for any negotiations with the Kyiv regime. Lavrov stressed that Moscow is always ready to listen to the Ukrainian side. But this is only possible if Ukraine itself shows readiness for the negotiation process with the Russian Federation. It was again noted that Moscow was and remains open for negotiations, but it is clearly not going to ask anyone for such negotiations.



Earlier, representatives of the Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the real "decision-making centers" are by no means located in Kyiv. In fact, Ukraine is pursuing a policy in the interests of the United States and the so-called collective West, being under the complete external control of the American administration.

If now the US authorities do not seek to end the conflict in Ukraine, then the Ukrainian authorities will not enter into any negotiations with Russia, which is confirmed by the current situation.

Recall that earlier Chinese President Xi Jinping said that the best way out of the situation would be a peaceful settlement of the armed conflict in Ukraine, not only for Ukraine itself, but also for European states. Now they are facing the extremely negative consequences of this conflict.
  • kremlin.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    1 December 2022 13: 41
    Lavrov has been talking all day today, and for a reason.
    1. -3
      1 December 2022 13: 45
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Lavrov has been talking all day today, and for a reason.

      So "winter rolls in the eyes." December ... December 21 - Comrade's birthday. I.V. Stalin. I need to prepare a present. And on 22.12.2022/22/22 (not even taking into account 22 hours, XNUMX minutes, XNUMX seconds) something will be for sure.
      1. +2
        1 December 2022 13: 47
        Another gift would be to prepare Grandpa Joe and the Catholic Church by December 25th. It would be nice. wink
        1. +6
          1 December 2022 13: 55
          We'll see how the oil embargo works on December 5th. bully
          1. +2
            1 December 2022 14: 02
            yes, we will look at everything, we are not in a hurry wink there, the hucksters of "bypass channels" of supplies have already created so many that the drug lords want to adopt such a scheme for organizing supplies.
      2. +2
        1 December 2022 14: 23
        Quote: Egoza
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Lavrov has been talking all day today, and for a reason.

        So "winter rolls in the eyes." December ... December 21 - Comrade's birthday. I.V. Stalin. I need to prepare a present. And on 22.12.2022/22/22 (not even taking into account 22 hours, XNUMX minutes, XNUMX seconds) something will be for sure.

        Necessarily, but write on shells and rockets - For the Motherland, For Stalin!
        Banderva does not like Stalin very much ... to the point of diarrhea.
      3. +4
        1 December 2022 14: 41
        Not only with Comrade Stalin .. I was lucky enough to be born exactly 100 years later than him, on his birthday ..
    2. -2
      1 December 2022 14: 04
      Negotiations asked Lavrov. To whom what, but naked - it was necessary to tryndet about the bathhouse.
      Here is the result. And nefig now cormorant how much in vain.
      You need to lay more precisely. Directly to the geeks in the crown of the head and without delay to press the trigger. Immediately send greetings, without selecting targets for military and political.
      In the end, the war will subside and life will get better. Without billionaire thieves and without their negotiations, extremely ruinous for our country.
    3. 0
      1 December 2022 15: 18
      Quote: tralflot1832
      talks all day, and it's not just

      There is an opinion that Lavrov has long been "saying just like that." His department has nothing to do either in the US or in Europe. And it is not interested in other countries: American- and Euro-centric, Anglo-lovers. It was such an upbringing: jeans, gin and tonic, chewing gum, rollers...
      1. +1
        1 December 2022 15: 23
        Whose opinion - surname, or personally yours, which you pass off as someone else. From December 1, do not be shy. bully
        1. 0
          2 December 2022 03: 19
          Andrei, I understand your patriotic fervor and law-abidingness, but ... didn’t Matvienko cry out several times about the thirst for negotiations "on any conditions", "anywhere" and "without any preconditions"? Isn't this a request for negotiations?
          But Lavrov is a diplomat and always expresses himself carefully. If the "party line" has changed, he will change the accents in diplomatic phrases. It looks like our leaders have abandoned the idea of ​​"negotiating".
          And this is good .
          1. 0
            2 December 2022 08: 01
            Lavrov gave a clear answer yesterday about our position on the negotiations. The rest were just talking heads who just wanted to talk. Everything is much more complicated. But after last night, everything became clear. The West is completely on Ze’s side. the battlefield, in the winter of 2022 - 23. Our removal of Ukraine's energy to the west did not work. They are affected only by the amount of territory that we control, they simply do not believe or do not want to believe that we can turn the issue with the territories in our favor. At least At least yesterday Lavrov reassured Russia, there will be no agreements with the West.
            1. 0
              2 December 2022 09: 48
              Quote: tralflot1832
              At least yesterday, Lavrov reassured Russia, there will be no agreements with the West.

              What am I talking about?
              YESTERDAY - reassured.
              And "The day before yesterday" through a word from the official about readiness for negotiations. Moreover, Matvienko is the head of the Senate. Not a "talking head", but more than an official in the Russian State. And then, in what form and with what words she called for negotiations ... everyone heard.
              And they wanted to negotiate not at all with Zelensky (who is he and what decisions does he make?), but with his owners. It was not possible to agree with the owners. They just want us dead. Just so we don't. And they want all code.
              Here are the pink illusions and dissipated and the Kremlin is faced with a banal reality.
              We have an argument - 300+ thousand freshly trained forces for the theater.
              They have an answer - Poland's readiness to enter the war, declared by the deputy. Minister of Defense of Poland. And also fresh long-range precision-guided ammunition for the Hymars. And the beginning of full-fledged financing of the production of Soviet-caliber shells for the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the facilities of NATO countries. For the Armed Forces of Ukraine have a lot of guns, but there are no Soviet shells. Now they will.
              And the accelerated entry of Sweden, Norway and Finland into NATO - hello new wonderful front.
              Question - what will we answer?
              "There will be no mobilization"?
              Or is it "Get up the Huge Country"?
              NATO countries have supplied the Ukrainian Armed Forces with about 900 sets of winter uniforms. Very good uniforms - much better and more convenient than ours - from the beginning of the NWO, our guys from the corps, with white envy, trophied it for themselves (only their jacket on top, so that they would not confuse their own). In winter, the Armed Forces of Ukraine know how to fight no worse than us - they practiced for almost 9 years.
              If, with the same attitude and intention as now, our government would start the NVO, if the task from the beginning was a military Victory, and not a "blitzkrieg" for the purpose of negotiations, the war would have ended with Victory long ago.
              Maybe at least now something sane will come.
              1. 0
                2 December 2022 09: 58
                Will Poland enter the war without NATO support? In one person, with its own aviation? Stupid and hopeless. Foreign policy is voiced by the President, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense. The rest only created a background for the West that we are ready for negotiations. Although after leaving Kyiv and Kharkov these prerequisites were not there. We will not know for a long time what Medinsky spoke about in Istanbul. Even the Ukrainians are silent about this.
                1. 0
                  2 December 2022 12: 38
                  Quote: tralflot1832
                  Poland will enter the war without NATO support?

                  Exactly . NATO has decided that some collective forces of the West can enter Ukraine - not NATO, but contingents of some NATO countries. This is primarily Poland, possibly Romania (their military has long been on our fronts and their speech is on the air), possibly other countries. Immediately after this decision, Deputy Minister of Defense of Poland. With the words that "War with Russia is more than likely." Kokli is running out, reinforcements are approaching the RF Armed Forces, it's time to bring in new forces. This War is not a game. Real .
                  Quote: tralflot1832
                  In one person, with your aircraft?

                  With everything that is. It will be necessary - NATO will throw it up, it's checked.
                  Quote: tralflot1832
                  .Foreign policy is voiced by the President, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Defense Ministry

                  Matvienko has a higher status than Lavrov. This is more than an official. Her status is even higher than that of Pelosi, if we consider analogies. She is the head of the Senate.
                  Quote: tralflot1832
                  What Medinsky talked about in Istanbul, we will not know for a long time.

                  We're just looking at things. And accomplishments. Almost all of "Azov" have already been exchanged, foreign mercenaries sentenced to death - too.
                  What in return?
                  "Grain deal" in which our grandmasters were thrown?
                  Or the launch of an ammonia pipeline? With whom they threw too?
                  Or do you believe in the transcendent charm of our diplomacy?
                  Roma did his best and got back 6-7 billion dollars.
                  This is the result.
                  Oligarchs allowed to trade metal in London?
                  This is victory ?
                  Quote: tralflot1832
                  Even Ukrainians are silent about this.

                  They are beneficiaries and beneficiaries. They promised that a special operation to release "Azov" would begin, and they released him. They promised to take Kherson - and got it. Should they be offended or ashamed of what?
                  Maybe something will change after Lavrov's speeches. There were a lot of beautiful and correct words. Things are much worse.
                  1. 0
                    2 December 2022 12: 51
                    So they allowed trading in metal in London? London only wants to take control of this trade. losses on commissions. The main requirement is to unblock the Rosselkhozbank unilaterally. What can be done by the West. Are we supposed to rot a record harvest? Look for how many elevator capacities we have for storage. With an ammonia pipeline, let the Americans protect it in Ukraine, since they are buyers. Something about his undermining subsided.
                    1. 0
                      2 December 2022 13: 15
                      Quote: tralflot1832
                      With an ammonia pipeline, let the Americans guard it in Ukraine, since they are buyers. Somehow the conversation about its undermining has subsided.

                      It was built for the Americans under the Union. Who will blow it up?
                      Quote: tralflot1832
                      The main requirement is to unblock the Rosselkhozbank unilaterally. What can be done by the West. Are we supposed to rot a record harvest?

                      To develop meat and dairy cattle breeding on this fodder base. And have your own fleet of ships for export, and not charter on the "free market".
                      1. 0
                        2 December 2022 13: 38
                        There are ships, but the owners do not want 75 ki of a new building to shine. The owners are Russians. We collected a lot of grain of the 000th grade, "distinguished" the central part of Russia.
                      2. 0
                        2 December 2022 13: 52
                        Quote: tralflot1832
                        There are ships, but the owners do not want to shine

                        belay How is it "do not want"? Nationalize (with a ransom, of course), create a state-owned company and export under our flag.
                        Will they not insure?
                        Establish your own / and insurance company, Iran did this and does not take a steam bath.
                        Who buys our grain mainly?
                        Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia?
                        Do they have billing issues?
                        Switch to trading in rubles and national currencies through swaps.
                        Or offer to drain the country's security for the sake of selling grain? Surrender the country with giblets? Admit defeat?
                        There is a war going on. Not with Ukraine, but in Ukraine - with NATO.
                        A good harvest is great.
                      3. 0
                        2 December 2022 14: 09
                        I myself look at the Novorossiysk grain terminal, maybe they will light up. Who carries the same grain. What to nationalize, an office of three rooms?
                      4. 0
                        2 December 2022 14: 11
                        Quote: tralflot1832
                        What to nationalize, an office of three rooms?

                        Vessels are grain carriers, why an office. Or is it all offshore?
                        Then deprive the license and initiate checks by all instances, if they refuse to either carry grain, or transfer ships to the state (for money).
                      5. 0
                        2 December 2022 14: 52
                        The sea freight business is so sticky. There are well-known companies that take over the main cargo flow. But there are thousands of companies that eat up the main multibillion-dollar "crumbs" for the main ones. .He will fracture a company that has ten thousandths. That's why all the cheese is boron. Remove sanctions not only from the main companies, but also from the freight.
  2. +6
    1 December 2022 13: 43
    We ask directly when we ask, as it is written on each projectile, we invite you to negotiations. We send 20 such requests per day.
    1. +2
      1 December 2022 13: 58
      I’ll tell you more, when X-555 arrives at one of the Ukrainian substations, then instead of a warhead, flowers fall out there (geraniums usually) and leaflets asking to forgive us and return to negotiations, but the fact that Ukraine periodically lacks electricity, so it’s them they fire at themselves, thereby protecting the ecology of our planet.
      1. +3
        1 December 2022 14: 22
        Maybe we’ll just get by with confetti, beautifully and raise a festive mood in Ukraine ?!
        1. +2
          1 December 2022 14: 33
          Why offend practically "relatives" with stingy gifts? Our country is not poor in tea, but in Ukraine there is not enough cast iron, and they are tired of the bridges built by the "damned Bolsheviks", they still cannot demolish it, get rid of the "damned" Soviet past, so to speak. It would be necessary to help, dear "relatives" - only expensive gifts. good
      2. +4
        1 December 2022 14: 43
        Haven't you noticed that they somehow quieted down with geraniums?
        1. +2
          1 December 2022 14: 47
          can gladioli cook? You won't understand these flower growers... request
          1. +2
            1 December 2022 14: 57
            I hope that the absence of their mass use does not indicate their absence in the troops ..
            1. +1
              1 December 2022 15: 09
              I am sure not, certain means of fire and air destruction are planned for each task. I think we will see somewhere else near Sumy or Chernihiv. wink
              1. +3
                1 December 2022 15: 38
                I do not share your confidence after 9 months, although I hope for the best
        2. 0
          1 December 2022 18: 02
          Quote: vitvit123
          Haven't you noticed that they somehow quieted down with geraniums?

          There is such. Geraniums have a larger charge than the Lancet, maybe they save for more significant purposes, and for the most part, the Lancet copes with those that are on the front line. winked
          1. 0
            1 December 2022 21: 50
            So geraniums seem to be on the front line and they didn’t use, of course .. for this, right, a lancet ..
            1. +1
              1 December 2022 22: 05
              Quote: vitvit123
              So geraniums seem to be on the front line and they didn’t use, of course .. for this, right, a lancet ..

              I mean, objects in the depths of Ukraine are now more and more spudding with missiles, and not with Geranium drones. Apparently, 50 kg of explosives for the guaranteed destruction of an infrastructure facility with the impossibility of its quick recovery is not enough, but for the advanced one, the Lancet is enough. Basically, they talk about its application.
              1. 0
                2 December 2022 08: 05
                Yeah ... at first, explosives were enough to use in the depths of Ukraine, everyone is happy, and now all of a sudden - once! And not enough explosives to make the transformer bang ...
                1. 0
                  2 December 2022 11: 12
                  Quote: vitvit123
                  Yeah ... at first, explosives were enough to use in the depths of Ukraine, everyone is happy, and now all of a sudden - once! And not enough explosives to make the transformer bang ...

                  Well, if you do not see the difference between 50 kg of explosive and 150 kg. then what to talk about? It's one thing to change a transformer and it's quite another thing when the floor of an object is rebuilt, or are these two absolutely equivalent tasks for you?
                  1. 0
                    2 December 2022 17: 34
                    Nothing ... i.e. you think that the goals for the edges are over ?! On the third largest country in Europe?! You shouldn't think so! There is enough infrastructure for any volume (mass, otherwise you suddenly cling to the word) BB, I assure you .. I think you won’t argue? Or do you think that's all, there are no goals for 50 kg of explosives? This is Ukraine! I'm not talking about barracks, crowded places (at night, for example), small-large warehouses, weapons ... I think you must agree with me ...
                    1. 0
                      2 December 2022 18: 47
                      Quote: vitvit123
                      Nothing ... i.e. you think that the goals for the edges are over ?! On the third largest country in Europe?! You shouldn't think so! There is enough infrastructure for any volume (mass, otherwise you suddenly cling to the word) BB, I assure you .. I think you won’t argue? Or do you think that's all, there are no goals for 50 kg of explosives? This is Ukraine! I'm not talking about barracks, crowded places (at night, for example), small-large warehouses, weapons ... I think you must agree with me ...

                      Yes, I agree, I agree. Just why are you asking questions then, if you do not want to take into account someone else's point of view different from yours?
                      Quote: vitvit123
                      Haven't you noticed that they somehow quieted down with geraniums?

                      I just answered your question and tried to justify why I think so. You did not accept my version. Well, okay. Each with his own. Let's finish this, the topic is closed. hi
                      1. 0
                        2 December 2022 19: 08
                        You yourself ask a question and then say that you want to finish ... it’s not logical, so I’ll write, there’s nothing to do, but you don’t have to read ..
                        I asked a question to find out the point of view of the opponent, it seems to me everything is clear here .. why do I not want to take into account the point of view of the opponent? I always delve into (try to) what they say to me, but this does not mean that the opponent will be right. I agree without problems when I'm wrong, but in this case I can't .., because the situation is obvious and it is surprising that you do not accept it .. you cannot admit that you are wrong or what? Hold your own.. and your last comment is just the height of logic.. although I do not want to offend, just reading the tricks is funny..now I can finish..
                        With respect to you and your opinion !!!
      3. +5
        1 December 2022 15: 27
        This is their best answer on their part so far.
  3. +4
    1 December 2022 13: 45
    They themselves came up with a bike, dispersed it themselves. Basurmans, they do not understand the Russian language, the difficulties of translation, they have a very poor language compared to Russian. I don’t speak for Chinese, it will be cooler than ours .... therefore, they also talk crookedly to Xi, he is about one thing, and they turn to the right, then to the left. Well, their language is very poor.
    1. +1
      1 December 2022 13: 49
      Quote from uprun
      They themselves came up with a bike, dispersed it themselves.

      They came up with a bike in the USA, but loyal subjects are dispersing it.
  4. +12
    1 December 2022 13: 46
    That is, it’s not his deputies who all swept aside with an invitation to negotiations, even the embassies got it? And who's lying here?
    1. +10
      1 December 2022 13: 56
      I don’t understand people at all who still believe these talking heads from both sides, or they deceive themselves or have problems with memory. Until the last day they told on TV that everything was in order in Kherson. How can you even trust them? request
      1. +2
        1 December 2022 14: 16
        On February 18, Lavrov claimed that there would be no SVO, all nonsense. Even though he didn't know?
        1. +4
          1 December 2022 15: 16
          And he certainly was obliged to notify everyone?
          1. -2
            1 December 2022 15: 26
            Of course not, but even now you don't have to tell the truth.
            1. +1
              1 December 2022 15: 29
              and someone expects the truth from politicians? from any politicians ... their job is to fool the population and other governments ...
  5. -3
    1 December 2022 13: 46
    Russia never asked for any negotiations with the Kyiv regime
    And this has already been said more than once. But the West really wants it to be Russia that asked, or even better, begged for negotiations, so they pour it from empty to empty. What a lie is nonsense, the main thing is that the Western citizen should be sure that Ukraine is "winning", which means that he does not suffer in vain.
    1. +2
      1 December 2022 13: 53
      It seems that Lavrov does not completely trust the State Department. It was directly told to them. The United States organized leaks on the Burns-Naryshkin negotiations. But it leaked what is beneficial to them. Lavrov spoke about our positions in the US negotiations on almost all issues.
      1. +2
        1 December 2022 15: 27
        Yes, you can trust the enemy, here you can get anything from the neighbors.
        1. +2
          1 December 2022 15: 37
          That's why there was such a press conference today. The Western media asked their tricky questions, to which Lavrov answered in such a way that there was no double interpretation. The Russian media asked questions about what interests the Russian people, to which Lavrov gave exhaustive answers.
  6. 0
    1 December 2022 14: 03
    Yes, why crucify before this trash, he also has his own catch phrase! good briefly and clearly!
  7. +2
    1 December 2022 14: 12
    The reports that Russia is asking for negotiations with Ukraine that have appeared in the Western information space are lies.
    . They just hang noodles on the ears of the layman ....
  8. -3
    1 December 2022 14: 22
    The NWO will end when Ukraine and Western countries are demilitarized. And negotiations are possible subject to the complete surrender of NATO countries !!! So that they hiccup!!!
    1. +2
      1 December 2022 15: 00
      About how!
      Will we take Washington?
      Well, of course, having previously dealt with Europe.
      And where will we get such an army to do all this?
      And another question - why? To take their place in this World?
      Or do we want to free everyone from them, so that everyone becomes free?
      Yes, no one asks us about this and is not going to ask us, most countries are quite satisfied with this procedure.
      PS. They have already liberated half of Europe once.
      1. 0
        3 December 2022 08: 01
        I specifically wrote about the fact that Russia is engaged in the demilitarization of Ukraine and NATO countries, and you went further and came up with a flag at the forefront of Congress and the White House in the United States.
  9. +8
    1 December 2022 14: 26
    In other words, Lavrov says that Russia is open to negotiations with "a gang of Nazis and drug addicts who have settled in Kyiv" (VV Putin). Who then are our statesmen?
    1. +1
      1 December 2022 18: 52
      Quote: Boris Sergeev
      In other words, Lavrov says that Russia is open to negotiations with "a gang of Nazis and drug addicts who have settled in Kyiv" (VV Putin). Who then are our statesmen?

      Boris, and who are the mattresses if they met in Qatar at the negotiating table with the Taliban, a "gang of bearded barmaley" who settled around Kabul in the surrounding duvals?
      At the same time, the initiative to hold negotiations belonged to the mattresses.
  10. +3
    1 December 2022 14: 27
    This was the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov.

    Oh come on!
    Russia, according to the head of the diplomatic department, never asked for any negotiations with the Kyiv regime.

    Mr. lied, he constantly talks about the desire to negotiate. Well, if this is a regime, then it needs to be removed? Although what am I talking about? Officially, no one is going to remove this regime, which means that Russia cannot offer any proposals of importance to it? So it turns out that without serious proposals, any talk about the desire to negotiate looks like a request to agree!
  11. -1
    1 December 2022 14: 27
    If Ze is nobody, but just a puppet, then if you talk to anyone, then with the owner, and not with the slave.
    And this needs to be stated clearly and clearly.
    And no Ursulas, Joseps, Macrons, sausages, should sit at the negotiating table.
    We don't need six.
    1. -2
      1 December 2022 14: 47
      So take your time and read all the answers to the questions that Lavrov gave. Now you can talk as much as you like about the negotiations, to his deputies. bully
      1. +1
        1 December 2022 14: 51
        Quote: tralflot1832
        So take your time and read all the answers to the questions that Lavrov gave. Now you can talk as much as you like about the negotiations, to his deputies. bully

        Thanks for the advice. Was reading.
  12. +1
    1 December 2022 14: 59
    As always wishful thinking.
  13. 0
    1 December 2022 15: 10
    It is not entirely accurately written. In Western publications it was written that Russia was losing the conflict and asking for negotiations.
    Everything is so smoky .............. they still demand reparations from the Russians, they have already lost 5 regions, but they behave like winners.
    1. 0
      1 December 2022 15: 43
      No...doesn't lose. Successes in Kharkov and Kherson, burning border villages and cities, hysteria instead of mobilization, a sunken flagship, a blown up bridge, a blown up gas pipeline ... and most importantly, hundreds of thousands of people who believed and abandoned ... these are clearly all signs of success ... oh yes .. .I forgot about grain and ammonia ... therefore, it doesn’t lose and doesn’t ask for anything ... the main thing is to believe.
  14. 0
    1 December 2022 18: 43
    The reports that Russia is asking for negotiations with Ukraine that have appeared in the Western information space are lies. This was the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov.

    really, really, how can it be...
    Let's see what's in our press...
    tass.ru › 30 sept. 2022 - Putin noted that Russia has repeatedly declared its readiness for negotiations.
    Nov 8 2022 - MFA. Russia does not put forward any additional conditions for the resumption of negotiations with Ukraine
    Nov 8 2022 - INTERFAX.RU - Russia does not set conditions for the resumption of negotiations with Ukraine
    there, in the Kremlin, of course, there are seven Fridays a week - sometimes we play, sometimes we don’t play, sometimes we wrap fish ...
    Everyone is afraid to sell cheap...
  15. 0
    3 December 2022 23: 47
    They often pass off wishful thinking as reality. Remember how they voted that Russia would use tactical nuclear weapons. Well, we still don't use it.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"