Ukraine receives Brimstone 2 guided missiles

12
Ukraine receives Brimstone 2 guided missiles
Launch of a Brimstone rocket from a Ukrainian-made launcher. Photo Telegram / BMPD


It became known that the UK began to supply the Kyiv regime with modern Brimstone 2 guided missiles. It is assumed that such weapon, which has enhanced tactical and technical characteristics, will help Ukrainian formations in solving combat missions. However, as practice shows, the effective use of foreign innovations is always in question.



New delivery


Back in the spring, Great Britain provided the Kyiv regime with the first batches of Brimstone missiles of the basic modification. The transfer of at least hundreds of missiles of this type was reported. For their use, the Ukrainian side has manufactured a number of improvised launchers based on civilian trucks.

Subsequently, rocket launches were repeatedly demonstrated, but their results remained unknown. Apparently, the shooting was carried out "in that direction" with a predictable lack of practical benefit. In addition, our fighters repeatedly found fallen rockets, in which the fuse and self-liquidator did not work.

At the beginning of the twenties of November, reports appeared in the British press about the continued supply of guided weapons to Ukraine. This time, newer Brimstone 2 missiles were included in the next batch of weapons.

A few days later, the British Ministry of Defense confirmed this information. It also published a video of the transport of such weapons. It showed the loading of containers with missiles into a military transport aircraft and its flight to one of the Eastern European airfields used as a transshipment point.


Unexploded rocket. Photo Telegram / "Corner of the Sith"

Details of deliveries are not reported. In this regard, it is not known when the Brimstone-2 began to be sent to Ukraine, how many missiles are planned for transfer, etc. However, the Ministry of Defense and the press did not forget to talk about the technical characteristics and advantages of such a missile, as well as its benefits for Ukrainian formations.

Apparently, a number of new Brimstone 2 missiles have already hit Ukrainian territory. Information on the use of such weapons has not yet been received. However, the current situation forces the Kyiv regime to use all available means as quickly as possible, and therefore British missiles may appear on the front line in the very near future.

Deep upgrade


The first version of the Brimstone ("Sulfur") guided missile for different platforms has been created in the UK since the eighties. Several companies were involved in the development; the project is now owned by MBDA. For various reasons, the development process was interrupted and faced with delays, and the missile entered service only in 2005. Shortly thereafter, the development of new modifications began.

In 2010, the British Ministry of Defense launched the development of a deep missile upgrade, designated as Brimstone 2 or Selective Precision Effects At Range Capability 2 (SPEAR 2). Its goal was to improve flight performance, create new guidance tools with advanced capabilities, etc. At the same time, it was necessary to maintain the same dimensions and weight, as well as compatibility with existing media.


Loading Brimstone 2 missiles for shipment to Ukraine. Photo Telegram / BMPD

In 2013, the Brimstone 2 project reached the testing stage. Missiles were launched from air carriers at various ground targets. After some modifications, the missile system was recommended for adoption. Deliveries of serial products to the armed forces of Great Britain began in 2015-16. The first combat carriers of the new missile were Tornado GR4 aircraft and AH-64E helicopters.

Also in the middle of the decade, MBDA began looking for new customers, but did not succeed in this. No country has so far been willing to buy the upgraded Brimstone, although the first version of the missile is enjoying some popularity in the market. In fact, Ukraine is now becoming the first foreign recipient of the new weapons. Perhaps this delivery is considered as a way to advertise a promising product.

With enhanced performance


The upgraded Brimstone 2 rocket does not outwardly differ from the base sample. The same cylindrical body 1,8 m long, 180 mm in diameter with a hemispherical head fairing and two sets of planes was used. The starting weight, as before, is 50 kg. At the same time, all the key components, on which the performance characteristics depend, went under the replacement.

Brimstone-2 received a new solid-propellant engine with improved parameters. With its help, the maximum flight range was brought to about 60 km - twice as much as that of the base rocket. However, such performance is achieved only when launched from an aircraft at high speed and an altitude of approx. 6 km. When launched from a helicopter, the range does not exceed 40 km, from ground platforms - even less.


Missiles of various modifications. Photo MBDA

In the course of modernization, the composition of the guidance means has changed. Flight to the target area is carried out using inertial navigation. An advanced active radar homing head and a semi-active laser are responsible for finding the target.

Like its predecessor, the missile carries a tandem HEAT warhead with a total mass of approx. 6,3 kg. The use of a new high-yield explosive resistant to external influences is reported. Penetration is not specified. "Brimstone" of the first version could penetrate 800 mm of armor behind dynamic protection. Probably, the upgraded rocket shows better performance.

Features and capabilities


In general, the Brimstone 2 missile is a modern and effective weapon with fairly high tactical, technical and combat characteristics. Its advantages are an increased flight range, the presence of several means of guidance and a fairly powerful warhead. All this makes it possible to attack various remote targets with high accuracy, which has been repeatedly demonstrated during tests.

It is easy to see that Ukraine does not have all the necessary means and opportunities for the full use of the full potential of British missiles. Because of this, she will not even be able to get close to the maximum performance and get the desired efficiency. In addition, the results of the use of missiles will be affected by opposition from the enemy in the person of the Russian army.

"Brimstone-2" is distinguished by an increased launch range, but a flight of 60 km is possible only when dropped from a carrier aircraft. Whether Ukraine will be able to adapt the aircraft it has left to use such a load is a big question. At the same time, she has improvised truck-based self-propelled launchers. However, when launched from the ground, the flight range is sharply reduced.


Rocket launch by AH-64E helicopter. Boeing Photos

Due to the long range of the missile, the complex needs separate means of reconnaissance and target designation. In its absence, various limitations and difficulties arise, and attempts to bypass them will not give the desired result. In particular, firing "at random" with the expectation that the missile itself will find a target in a given area, or direct-fire launches at a limited range are, at the very least, a dubious measure.

It should be remembered about the opposition from the Russian army. So, it can knock out the reconnaissance means of the missile system or suppress the missile guidance means. In addition, it is quite possible that modern domestic anti-aircraft systems are able to detect and hit Brimstone in flight.

Due to range limitations, there are also risks for the missile system / launcher. They can be identified and affected, incl. artillery fire. The ground version of the Brimstone 2 does not exceed the range of common large-caliber guns in range, which creates known risks. In fact, the only salvation from a retaliatory strike is the mobility gained from the automobile chassis.

Help and advertising


Ukrainian formations are receiving new foreign missile weapons and are probably already mastering it, and are also preparing for real combat use. The Brimstone 2 rocket features increased tabular performance, which gives rise to optimism and enthusiasm. However, the actual situation imposes a number of limitations, and the two versions of Brimstone in practice will not have significant differences and will not be able to show outstanding results.

However, the UK provides the most modern version of the missile. The reasons for this are simple. London has its own interests in Ukraine and is ready to support the Kyiv regime in all available ways, incl. through the supply of modern weapons. In addition, in the case of Brimstone-2, it becomes possible to advertise your weapon. However, one should not expect that such an "advertising campaign" will be effective and will seriously affect sales.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    4 December 2022 12: 54
    in view of the fact that the natives significantly reduce the effects of the use of weapons (the history of the use of javelins is worth something), we expect the delivery of new British complexes complete with crews and instructors (similar to HIMARS)
    1. +1
      4 December 2022 17: 00
      Quote: silberwolf88
      we expect the delivery of new British complexes complete with calculations and instructors (similar to HIMARS)

      Then the factory description and instructions for use translated into Russian.
      1. 0
        5 December 2022 16: 52
        Did they hit strategic aviation at airfields?
    2. -1
      22 January 2023 18: 38
      Everyone often writes about some kind of calculations, instructors, about Polish tank crews. Is there any documented evidence for this? prisoners, killed, etc.
  2. +4
    4 December 2022 17: 41
    especially pleased with the photo with the "unexploded" rocket, lonely stuck like that lol does anyone know how fast it flies and what happens when it encounters an obstacle. would not disgrace
    1. 0
      4 December 2022 21: 17
      Quote: novel xnumx
      Does anyone know how fast it flies

      given that "it" is many times better than the AGM-65G and AGM-114, then in the region of Mach 2,5-3, otherwise ask our comrades from Israel (they somehow have more access to the NATO PSU) ...
  3. +4
    4 December 2022 18: 17
    The Brimstone 2 rocket features increased tabular performance, which gives rise to optimism and enthusiasm. However, the actual situation imposes a number of limitations, and the two versions of Brimstone in practice will not have significant differences and will not be able to show outstanding results.
    However, the UK provides the most modern version of the missile. The reasons for this are simple. London has its own interests in Ukraine and is ready to support the Kyiv regime in all available ways, incl. through the supply of modern weapons. In addition, in the case of Brimstone-2, it becomes possible to advertise your weapon. However, one should not expect that such an "advertising campaign" will be effective and will seriously affect sales.
    Almost a standard cliché of the author...
  4. +1
    5 December 2022 10: 39
    It is significant that the rocket was immediately adapted for use from various types of carriers. Here, a few months ago, I read on this site that an anti-tank missile from the arsenal of Ka-52 helicopters (and far from being put into service yesterday) is being adapted for use from Mil helicopters. I was shocked that it turns out that two families of our helicopters have incompatible ammunition nomenclature! That is, you need to develop two lines of identical weapons, and this is only for turntables! With this approach, it is possible to kill a budget equal to the American one for R & D, and not have anything suitable for serial production and real combat use in the output! But the analogue net in a single copy, for parades and exhibitions will be through the roof.
    From the same series - the need to load "Caliber" into launch containers on ships, even if the fleet will fire them almost directly from the pier. It would seem - place the container on an automobile, railway chassis, provide the possibility of launching from an aircraft, the simplest - from a military transport one, then you can develop and improve one universal missile for all types of aircraft, but we are not looking for easy ways! For easy ways and budgets are "easy", but what to cut?
  5. 0
    9 January 2023 19: 55
    It's strange ... Why haven't Argentina and Venezuela adopted our old Granites so far? And then the Britons hang around the Malvinas Islands and s in the Gulf of Mexico
    1. +1
      8 February 2023 18: 36
      Quote: AnalystIT
      It's strange ... Why haven't Argentina and Venezuela adopted our old Granites so far?

      Because our elite is firmly seated in London.
      If you put something like that in Argentina, you will have to leave your homes, pick up your children from Oxfords.
  6. 0
    17 February 2023 14: 00
    It is necessary to hide all military aviation, OTK, PGRK, etc. under the "ground" like Iran. Too many drones have divorced, and this is just the beginning ... IMHO
  7. 0
    24 February 2023 21: 43
    The fact that their missiles do not explode must be kept quiet, otherwise the adversaries will quickly eliminate the shortcomings of their weapons.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"