Brexit regularly stumbles on sanctions

Brexit regularly stumbles on sanctions

Offshore is troubled

As has been noted more than once in "VO" (And again about the boomerang of sanctions), almost all foreign British territories until the end of October 2022 remained in the Russian Federation outside the list of “unfriendly”, that is, subject to Russian counter-sanctions. Not so long ago, this gap was filled: on October 30, the Russian government added eleven British overseas territories to the "unfriendly" register.

Of course, this happened against the background of the continuing deterioration of Russian-British relations. Therefore, it is not surprising that under pressure from London, the authorities of the same eleven British territories began to impose economic sanctions against the Russian Federation from August-October.

Including, first of all, full or partial freezing of Russian assets; prohibition or restrictions on re-export to and from the Russian Federation; for transactions in Russian rubles; an embargo on investments, including foreign ones, from these territories into the Russian economy. Restrictions began to be introduced even on Russian tourism in these territories.

Recall that most of all British territories abroad are well-known re-export and offshore centers of global rank. According to British sources (2021-2022), at least a third of Russian offshore assets are registered in the same offshore territories in London; at least a third of re-export operations between the Russian Federation and abroad are carried out, again, through these territories. And all this is by no means the first year.

The inclusion in the unfriendly register of the British Chagos Archipelago in the center of the Indian Ocean and the Falkland Islands is an indirect support for the long-standing demands of Argentina and Mauritius for the return of these territories to them. By the way, the British-American military bases on Chagos do not interfere with offshore business in the same archipelago...

It is noteworthy that the British territories that have been preserved since 1959 in the south and southeast of Cyprus are included in the unfriendly list: Akrotiri and Dhekelia (260 sq. km in total). But here there are no offshores at all: the British Air Force, Navy facilities and intelligence facilities account for at least 70% of the total territory of those areas. They are also of strategic importance for British and generally NATO control of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Suez Canal.

Case of Cyprus

To clarify: Cyprus became independent from London in August 1960. But according to Article 3 of the indefinite “Treaty of Guarantees and Independence, the Territorial Integrity of the Island of Cyprus” (1960), the Republic of Cyprus, Greece and Turkey assume “the obligation to respect the integrity of the regions.

After the formation of the Republic of Cyprus, they all remain under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, and guarantee their use by the United Kingdom. For its Cypriot areas, Britain has made the following commitments:

– do not develop them for non-military purposes;
– not to establish for them the status of a colony and not to manage them as a colony;
- not to create customs posts or other border barriers with the territory of the Republic of Cyprus;
– not to expropriate private property there, except for military purposes and for compensation.

The administration of the British "sovereign territories" is subordinate to the British Ministry of Defense; Elections to the British Parliament are not held here. The same areas have their own legal system based on the British colonial acts in force in Cyprus in the second half of the 1950s. So the colonial status of Akrotiri and Dhekelia is almost respected...

Characteristic in this regard is the fact that Turkey's military invasion of Cyprus in 1974 stopped literally in front of the gates of the British Dhekelia. But the then requests of Athens and Nicosia to London to stop the Turkish invasion with the help of the same British bases remained unanswered. But these bases were used during NATO operations in Yugoslavia, the Libyan Jamahiriya, Iraq, Somalia and Syria.

And in October 2022 and earlier it was reported that not only the British Air Force, but also the American Drones after departure from Akrotiri, they often ply near the Crimea. In a word, the hostility of the British areas in Cyprus towards Russia is all the more obvious ...

Looking from London to the Commonwealth

But, if we consider the situation in a broader context, the inclusion of all the mentioned territories in an unfriendly registry indirectly, if not directly, limits London's plans to play what is called an "independent" role in the world, as few others have. In direct connection with the notorious Brexit.

In any case, the British plans to increase their influence on the financial and economic policy of the Russian Federation in general are failing in connection with the mentioned decision of Russia. Moreover, since the second half of 2022, exchange trading in the British pound has been stopped in the Russian Federation, and since the fall of 2022, exchange transactions with this currency have not been carried out.

However, London, claiming its former positions in the world, is also trying to act through the British, or rather, unambiguously oriented towards the British crown, "Commonwealth of Nations". For example, since July of this year, seemingly "pro-French" Gabon and Togo have become members of the Commonwealth. Where, let us recall, the military bases of France are still preserved - the franc still operates today - the currency that is actually controlled by the French treasury, which has long since switched to the euro.

According to a number of data, ex-French Benin, Madagascar, Mauritania, as well as Sudan and South Sudan are planned to join the same Commonwealth in 2023 (the entire Sudan, we recall, was an Anglo-Egyptian protectorate until 1955 inclusive).

In parallel, London is still implementing the project of Theresa May and Boris Johnson to transform this association into an analogue of the European Union. Accordingly, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand introduced new exemptions for the import of goods and services from other Commonwealth countries in 2022; written off bоthe bulk of the debts of the 35 least developed countries of the Commonwealth to Great Britain and the mentioned dominions.

In other words, London is still determined to take revenge for past mistakes and shortcomings?..
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    December 2 2022
    Well, let's see. Great Britain is far from being what it used to be militarily, financially, economically, but at the same time it does not hold cunning ass.

    I'm wondering if the United Kingdom is really the closest ally of the United States?
    1. +6
      December 2 2022
      The small island is still influential and rich, ALL the elites of the former colonies are imprisoned for London. What can we say, ours, too, until recently, preferred London, instead of Lipetsk, Cherepovets. Magnitogorsk, etc., where their assets are located.
      1. -1
        December 2 2022
        Besides the love of the elite for London, is there anything else confirming its status in world politics?

        It's just that it's hard for me to believe that the UK is able to influence the countries of the Commonwealth without the support of the United States.

        They have more problems in the economy than the EU.

        The only G7 country that never recovered during covid.

        2 aircraft carriers, one of which cannot even sail to the USA.

        In general, if without conspiracy theories, then if desired, almost any country of cooperation can show the middle finger to Great Britain, because they (Great Britain) cannot do anything without the United States.
        1. 0
          December 2 2022
          Besides the love of the elite for London, is there anything else confirming its status in world politics?

          As practice shows, even this is sometimes enough to keep a bunch of countries in poverty.
          It's just that it's hard for me to believe that the UK is able to influence the countries of the Commonwealth without the support of the United States.

          The tail wags the dog, that happens too. Of the latter, it was the small Britons who began to provide full-scale assistance to the ancient Ukrainians. And they tightened the SVO. The purpose of the Englishwoman - to plunge the two Slavic peoples into war and impoverishment, is perfectly executed.
          They have more problems in the economy than the EU.
          leave as always at the expense of the elites of developing countries. Money doesn't smell to them.
          The only G7 country that never recovered during covid.

          In addition to China, no one has recovered.
          2 aircraft carriers, one of which cannot even sail to the USA.

          This is not an indicator of the effectiveness of the state.
          because they (Great Britain) without the USA will not be able to do anything.

          There are many of them.
          1. 0
            December 2 2022
            In addition to China, no one has recovered.

            India has recovered well, especially this year and last year. India will surpass the UK in GDP this year
            Southeast Asia has grown twice as fast as China this year.
            Out of the G7, the U.S. did best with a 2,6% increase before the pandemic.
            Canada 1,7%.
            Italy 1,1%.
            France 0,9%.
            Japan 0,6%.
            Germany 0%.
            Britain minus 0,2%.
        2. +2
          December 2 2022
          Britain is one of the global financial centers of the world. As an example, prices in the Russian Federation for Russian metal are still tied (albeit partially) to prices on the London Metal Exchange.
          1. -1
            December 3 2022
            Note that the City of London is not actually part of the UK. Many laws of the country do not work there, they have their own police and, as it were, self-government. In fact, this is an enclave of financiers without nationality, but with one religion with the letter "i", for which all other peoples are fodder and an object of fraud.
        3. -1
          December 7 2022
          Quote: far diu
          Besides the love of the elite for London, is there anything else confirming its status in world politics?

          Number of Nobel Prize winners from Britain. The quality of British education. The absence of mass repression against the intelligentsia in Britain since the time of Cromwell.
  2. +8
    December 2 2022
    Great Britain left its colonies, but remained in them. Russia, as it left its republics, left. Others come in its place.
  3. 0
    December 2 2022
    It's strange that THIS has been dragged out for so many years. But OUTSIDE the hostile number of offshore-foreign areas of the USA, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands. So loopholes for overflows remain - for a reason ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"