Military Review

Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now

133
Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now
The only one who can be affected by the resolution of the European Parliament is on the left in the picture. Source: news.myseldon.com



New symbols of Europe


On November 23, European parliamentarians, as expected, unanimously adopted a resolution recognizing Russia "the state sponsoring terrorism and the state using the means of terrorism". 494 deputies voted in favor of the document, 58 voted against and the remaining 44 abstained. It is not clear whether Russia is now considered a terrorist country, but even these accusations seem very heavy. Every Russian, as a taxpayer, according to the logic of the Europeans, can now be considered a sponsor of terrorists. And this is after Russia's many years of bloody struggle against terror in the Caucasus. After the destruction of the "ISIS" (an organization banned in the Russian Federation) in Syria. No one expected otherwise from European political leaders, but all the same, such events cause bouts of nausea. Our diplomats dealt with these same people. They probably shook hands when they met. But it's all emotions. Let's try to take a cool look at the situation.

The European Parliament acts consistently. The public both in Europe itself and in Ukraine demands loud statements and demarches. If there was a will, Russia would have been recognized as a sponsor of terrorists on February 25, but the rules of the game require the gradual laying out of trump cards. Otherwise, after a while, there will simply be nothing to cover. In an endless series of pro-Nazi events, the Andrey Sakharov Prize has recently flashed, which European lawmakers presented "to the brave people of Ukraine through their President, elected leaders and civil society". The award is small, only 50 thousand euros, but symbolic. Everything is mixed here - the Soviet legacy, and Ukrainian "self-determination", and the traditional anti-Russian agenda. Among the contenders for the award, in addition to the Ukrainian side, was Julian Assange and a little-known human rights commission from Colombia. But who in their right mind in Europe would give the award to Assange, who faces up to 175 years in prison in the US? And Colombia? Who cares about Colombian problems now? The Sakharov Prize Committee is traditionally not indifferent to the post-Soviet space and Russia itself - over the years of its existence, people from these countries have been awarded six times. In the same clip, an attempt by European parliamentarians to confiscate Russia's frozen assets in Europe. The deputies came up with the idea back in May, but so far no practical steps have been heard. However, only the naive can hope for the return of funds to Russia.

The decision of the European Parliament to recognize Russia as a country sponsoring terrorism was a kind of response to the missile strikes on November 15 on the Ukrainian energy system. These were the most powerful blows since the beginning of the entire special operation. Europe had to react, and it did. Not with the supply of air defense systems, but with a resonant statement that will please no one except Zelensky and his accomplices. Checked the box and that's it. As the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe did a month earlier, since October 13, the Russians, according to these guys, are also sponsoring terrorists. There is a lot of noise from such statements. All-European deputies not only equated the Russians with terrorists, but also composed recommendations for the European Union. In particular, they are asking to create a special base for states sponsoring terrorism, and to include Russia in it in the first place. The Kremlin has surprised the impressionable European public so much that they are now demanding separate legislative acts for the country. The new institutionwill entail a number of significant restrictive measures in relation to these countries and will have serious restrictive consequences for the EU's relations with these countries". By the way, both the House of Representatives and the US Senate have previously called on Anthony Blinken to do the same. The State Department is silent. So far, the European Union is silent. In much the same way, they remained silent about the October resolution of the European Parliament on a large-scale increase in military assistance to the Kyiv regime. All these initiatives of deputies are more like Moska's barking at an elephant. Or, as they put it in the Russian Federation Council, on "imitation of violent anti-Russian activities". Surprisingly, the European Parliament also has quite sound ideas in its portfolio. For example, at the request of MPs, by the end of 2024, all mobile devices, tablets and cameras sold in the European Union must be equipped with USB Type-C chargers. Good idea. They would do something like this, and not make themselves out to be world arbitrators who determine who is a terrorist here and who is not.

European split


Following the pan-European deputies, mass solidarity of the parliaments of individual EU countries is expected. There are already followers - the Dutch parliament has recognized Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. Similar to the document of the European Parliament, the statement has no legal force. Actually, that's why the Dutch are so bold and scatter accusations. People's deputies from Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Estonia and the Czech Republic were ahead of everyone - they decided that the Russians were sponsoring terrorism even before the official position of the European Parliament.

Despite the negligible "exhaust" of all the statements, legitimate questions arise for the European parliamentarians. Are you out of your mind? The European Union regularly pays Gazprombank for gas and oil. This money, according to the Jesuit logic of the Europeans, goes to ensure that very “sponsorship of terrorism”. Monetary allowances for military personnel and the provision of state orders are not taken out of thin air. In pursuit of the recognition of Russia as an accomplice of terrorists, a similar act will have to be adopted for Hungary, Germany, Austria, Greece and other priority partners that do not delay payments for the supply of Russian hydrocarbons. Without this statement, the European Parliament will discredit itself.

Splitting is planned in the once united Europe. Call it political or ideological, whatever you want. We see the manifestation of the notorious Realpolitik from the executive branch of individual countries and the perfect hovering in the clouds from the legislature. Non-binding declarations, calls for a boycott and tougher sanctions. It is becoming much easier and more profitable for Moscow not to contact the European Union at all, let alone the European Parliament, but to descend to the level of national governments. A similar approach is demonstrated by European partners, from Italy to Hungary. Europeans have always been distinguished by healthy pragmatism.

It is paradoxical that the master of the Western world - the United States - does not even think about declaring Russia not only a terrorist power, but even a sponsor. At the same time, the Americans have a corresponding law that regulates clear signs for including the state in the list of sponsors of terrorists. Russia, of course, does not fit any of the parameters. On what grounds the European Parliament determined the sponsorship of Russia, it is not clear. For example, Iran is on the list of those who finance terrorism. Since 1984, Washington has charged him with supporting a host of Islamic fundamentalists throughout the Middle East. Syria was on the list even earlier, in 1979. The State Department accuses Damascus of supporting the Palestinian Hamas and other small terrorist groups. Even seemingly harmless Cuba is also on the black list of terrorist financiers. Havana flew in for providing asylum to the fighters of the Basque group ETA and revolutionaries from Colombia. And what about Russia? Recognize volunteer battalions, like the Wagner group and the 141st Special Regiment named after A. A. Kadyrov, as terrorist, and then declare Russia a sponsor? The European Parliament proposes to do something similar. The absurdity of this is understood in the United States and has repeatedly rejected the idea of ​​including Russia on the black list. And local legislators act with some kind of maniacal obsession. First, in 2018, they tried to link the poisoning of the Skripals with terrorist activities. Failed. Two years later, a new initiative - this time for the alleged support of the Taliban (banned in the Russian Federation), no less imaginary interference in the American elections and other nonsense. It didn't work out again. And finally, in 2022, the State Department was simply overwhelmed with demands to recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorists. Starting from Zelensky and ending with petty senators. It didn't work again. Largely because it will be a mere formality - sanctions have already been imposed on the country, comparable in severity to "sponsor" ones. The mentioned Iran is much weaker than Russia under US restrictions, but this does not prevent anyone in the West from calling it "an accomplice of terror." That is why neither the European Union, nor the US State Department, nor the executive branch in Europe will ever recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorism. The West is gradually approaching the ceiling of its ability to impose sanctions on the Kremlin, and with it, the fear of retaliatory measures is growing.

Let's return to the question from the title - what to do now? Nothing. Focus and ignore the clowns who call themselves European parliamentarians.
Author:
133 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 29 November 2022 05: 14
    +7
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism"

    - "Whoever calls names, that's what they call" ...
    ***
    1. laws70
      laws70 29 November 2022 06: 01
      +25
      - "Whoever calls names, that's what they call" ...

      Coming soon to the European Court of Justice:
      Did he look at me the wrong way?
      - How wrong?
      - Well, somehow in Russian, or something.
      - Guilty!
      1. uyrii
        uyrii 29 November 2022 07: 55
        -22
        yes, in any court, if you killed a neighbor who you didn’t like because he has a hunting rifle at home, and his wife has a set of knives in the kitchen, although you have a machine gun and an ax at home (nuclear weapons, by the way, created by the same neighbor) who recognize you????
        1. Jcvai
          Jcvai 29 November 2022 08: 31
          +21
          Depends on the judges. For example, during the Maidan of mass murderers, those who did not like the language, ethnic group, the same "European judges" were called national heroes.

          So it's pointless to try this "no war" here - this only works on unreasonable morons, i.e. either an outright enemy or an unreasonable being can call.
          Because anyone with a mind, at least in its infancy, will see a situation in the style of “hit a passerby in the back, and then shout at the top of your voice no to violence” so as not to get an answer. Those. this is not about violence, but about hypocritical attempts to escape from just retribution.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Jcvai
              Jcvai 29 November 2022 08: 58
              +17
              Gorbachev and Yeltsin were forced to kill Russian speakers?
              Another unsuccessful attempt, designed for those who do not know how to think.
              Dava burned down, the car was stolen - they, too, probably.
              In general, everyone is to blame in one way or another. Some as direct bandits and murderers, others as covering, others as indifferently ignoring.
              But here's an important nuance: you don't like the fact that Russia has stopped covering your killers with an indifferent policy of non-intervention. And you can point out the reasons for your own bloody maniacs, even Gorbachev, even Lenin, even a difficult childhood or climate. The only important thing is that in the same conditions others remained human beings.

              I will add: my personal fault in what happened, of course, is also there: and that I did not defend the Union with weapons in my hands when it collapsed, and that I did not have the opportunity to protect people in the Odessa House of Trade Unions, and in many other ways. This does not remove responsibility.
              But, an important nuance, it's one thing - if my descendants and relatives judge me for my inaction, it's another thing - when a murderer who has escaped punishment is judged for non-interference in his own crimes.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. garrett
                  garrett 29 November 2022 15: 33
                  +12
                  you forgot the formidable and two Chechen when they wanted to secede (although you yourself said take freedom as much as you want)

                  Oh, how convenient (c) ... to blurt out about the independence of the proud nokhchos and modestly keep silent about the advice, the genocide of the non-Chechen population (remind you how many Russians lived in Grozny before 95, or do you know how to use Google yourself?), kidnapping, arms trafficking. And mind you, all this was before 1996!!!
                  ps It's hypocrisy, yeah laughing
                  1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 29 November 2022 11: 30
              +8
              Quote from uyrii
              this was done NOT by the Georgians Stalin and NOT by the "khokh.l" Brezhnev, but EXACTLY by the Russians Gorbachev and Yeltsin. so who do you judge yourself ????

              Evona, as in fluffy and white ones, we strive to jump off. No dear, it wasn't like that. Where did they put their Kravchuk?
              To be precise, they ruined Kravchuk, Shushkevich and Yeltsin with the connivance of Gorbachev.
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. Jcvai
              Jcvai 29 November 2022 09: 26
              +6
              Thousands of civilians also died, for example, during the bombing of Yugoslavia. Do you think this gives me the right to go and kill my neighbors because they communicate with each other in a different language?
              Although, from the point of view of adult logic, I understand you: acting as a lawyer for maniac killers, you can download only precedents for others who have escaped fair punishment, pulling up and distorting the facts. You can’t (at least being among Russians, it’s obvious that everything will be the other way around among Bandera) declare that the Nazis did everything right, arranging genocide against Russian-speakers in eastern Ukraine.
              Which is what you are talking about, if you take your original phrase "in any court" and my corresponding answer "Depends on the judges".
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. Jcvai
                  Jcvai 29 November 2022 15: 32
                  +5
                  why are you killing russians

                  These are, again, slogans without the participation of the mind.
                  There are fighting not Russians with Russians, but anti-fascists against the Nazis. And on both sides, the International is involved, and not just the Russians.
                  why didn’t they start in the Baltic States

                  The Tribalts, of course, have been asking for a long time at the political level. But they (the ruling elite and the “colonazi” part of the population) are afraid of organizing a genocide, physically slaughtering all Russian-speaking dissidents with state support.
                  NATO's 5th Amendment Works

                  This is, of course, a deterrent argument, but there are a couple of nuances:
                  1. According to Article 5, the response of NATO allies is "before military", but not necessarily "including military". Those. other NATO members under Article 5 can simply express disapproval through their Foreign Ministries.
                  2. Mass and unpunished killings of Russians with state support is aggression against the Russian Federation, therefore Article 5, calculated only for mutual protection, does not work.
                  You don’t have to go far, just remember how the tribalts decided to set up a transport blockade of the Kaliningrad region, the Russian Federation said that this was obvious aggression and an attempt on integrity ... their own primary aggression against Russia 5th point will not work.
                  That's when those who control NATO themselves will be ready to attack Russia with impunity - then there will be a command to search or organize a formal reason. But until the "liberalists" destroy their own traitors and sell off the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, this is unlikely.
                  his slaughter in Ukraine

                  Ours there "on tiptoe" actually acted. Look at NATO operations in Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq and so on. Yes, suffice it to recall the nuclear "peace enforcement" in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the chemical attacks in Vietnam ... Now this is called a massacre! And the fact that in Ukraine is precisely a special operation, without leveling civilian cities with the ground, with the maximum possible minimization of damage to civilians.
                  in the Donbass, after all, you started

                  Here, yes, we started in the Donbass, back in the 18th century, by annexing the Sea of ​​\u2022b\u2014bAzov to the Russian Empire. And in XNUMX, they only began to directly protect their own, which they should have done back in XNUMX, when the Ukrainian Nazis were moving in a wave across Ukraine, destroying people. It was only after Odessa that their campaign against Donbass and Luhansk ceased to be an unpunished massacre and people, citizens of Ukraine, stood up to defend their homeland from Nazism. And Russia supported them in this.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              2. ahdyery
                ahdyery 30 November 2022 08: 14
                0
                The question of free will is indeed the touchstone by which one can distinguish between deep and shallow minds, or the boundary pillar where the two diverge.
            2. garrett
              garrett 29 November 2022 15: 34
              0
              Aren't you ashamed to refer to such resources?
          3. dorz
            dorz 29 November 2022 09: 55
            +2
            The left parties voted against the resolution, with which it was previously necessary to build ties.
        2. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 29 November 2022 11: 21
          -1
          Quote from uyrii
          yes, in any court, if you killed a neighbor who you didn’t like because he has a hunting rifle at home, and his wife has a set of knives in the kitchen, although you have a machine gun and an ax at home (nuclear weapons, by the way, created by the same neighbor) who recognize you????

          So after all, it would be if he killed, and in this case, a neighbor is not killed, but given that he is insane, they are forcibly treated. So far, they are only trying to put a straitjacket on him. So here it is not necessary to define terrorists, but doctors.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. And Us Rat
              And Us Rat 29 November 2022 17: 00
              +1
              Quote from uyrii
              Now, if they start treating you like that, cutting off body parts live, how are you going to yell ???

              How else can gangrene be treated? Amputation only. And the patient himself refused anesthesia.
              1. haron
                haron 29 November 2022 17: 13
                -6
                Quote: And Us Rat
                How else can gangrene be treated? Amputation only.

                Well, treat your gangrene. You are a doctor chtoli to determine who the neighbor has a thief (oh, excuse me, gangrene), and who is an oligarch (oh, sorry - interfering with a happy life).
                Heal yourself first, and then teach the rest of the world how to live correctly.
                1. And Us Rat
                  And Us Rat 29 November 2022 17: 30
                  +2
                  Quote: haron
                  Heal yourself first, and then teach the rest of the world how to live correctly.

                  But I do not want. And what will you do about it? bully
                  1. haron
                    haron 29 November 2022 18: 34
                    -3
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    But I do not want. And what will you do about it?

                    I will treat. As he once swore to his relatives, to the Motherland and to himself "... not sparing his blood and life itself in order to achieve complete victory over enemies ..."
                    1. And Us Rat
                      And Us Rat 29 November 2022 19: 14
                      +1
                      Quote: haron
                      I will treat.

                      Well forward. wassat
        3. Sergey_52
          Sergey_52 29 November 2022 11: 48
          +2
          yes in any court if you killed a neighbor

          I have become old, I forgot whether there was at least one trial for these murders?
          Korea and China (1950-53)
          Guatemala (1954)
          Indonesia (1958)
          Cuba (1959-61)
          Guatemala (1960)
          Congo (1964)
          Laos (1964-73)
          Vietnam (1961-73)
          Cambodia (1969-70)
          Guatemala (1967-69)
          Grenada (1983)
          Lebanon (1983,1984)
          Libya (1986)
          El Salvador (1980s)
          Nicaragua (1980s)
          Iran (1987)
          Panama (1989)
          Iraq (1991)
          Kuwait (1991)
          Somalia (1993)
          Bosnia (1994, 1995)
          Sudan (1998)
          Afghanistan (1998)
          Yugoslavia (1999)
          Yemen (2002)
          Iraq (1991-2003)
          Iraq (2003-2015)
          Afghanistan (2001-2015)
          Pakistan (2007-2015)
          Somalia (2007, 2008, 2011)
          Yemen (2009, 2011)
          Libya (2011, 2015)
          Syria (2014-2015)
          1. The comment was deleted.
        4. impi
          impi 1 December 2022 21: 16
          0
          yes, in any court, if you killed a neighbor who you didn’t like because he has a hunting rifle at home, and his wife has a set of knives in the kitchen, although you have a machine gun and an ax at home (nuclear weapons, by the way, created by the same neighbor) who recognize you????


          Hmm, let's continue the analogy... A neighbor with a hunting rifle 8 years earlier killed his brother in his own apartment. The court ruled that everything was fine and presented another gun.

          Is there something wrong with the court?
        5. SavranP
          SavranP 2 December 2022 20: 42
          +1
          "(nuclear weapons, by the way, created by the same neighbor)". No need to compose, Ukraine had nothing to do with Soviet (Russian) nuclear weapons and tactical nuclear weapons. The whole dozen "atomic" cities of the USSR Sredmash, where the production of weapons-grade uranium and plutonium, as well as the design bureaus of nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons and research institutes in the profile, were located in Russia: in the Volga region, in the Urals and in Siberia.
    2. Paul Siebert
      Paul Siebert 29 November 2022 07: 09
      +16
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      "Whoever calls names, that's what they call" ...

      wink
      1. Machito
        Machito 29 November 2022 08: 10
        +3
        Russia supplies gas, oil, electricity, coal, diamonds, uranium, titanium, neon, fertilizer and other resources to the terrorist fascist European Union, and therefore is a sponsor of terrorism. The terrorist European Union, circumventing its own sanctions,
        continues trading operations with its sponsor Russia.
    3. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 29 November 2022 07: 51
      +16
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      Whoever calls names, that is what they call "...

      No, this is called "the mice pricked, cried, but continued to eat the cactus." This is me saying that no matter what abomination you do in the West, we will continue to pump oil, gas, ammonia to them, sell them gold, diamonds, fertilizers. And in return for this, we will receive a currency with an extremely low solvency (for us), because due to sanctions, we cannot buy almost anything from Europe.
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 29 November 2022 08: 28
        +6
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        called "the mice pricked, cried, but continued to eat the cactus"

        Under capitalism it is. Either you are a hegemon, or you are a periphery, there is no third way ...
      2. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 29 November 2022 10: 01
        -2
        Quote: Ingvar 72

        No, this is called "the mice pricked, cried, but continued to eat the cactus." This is me saying that no matter what abomination you do in the West, we will continue to pump oil, gas, ammonia to them, sell them gold, diamonds, fertilizers. And in return for this, we will receive a currency with an extremely low solvency (for us), because due to sanctions, we cannot buy almost anything from Europe.

        I think the same way and I want to support and support you. But there is a flip side to the coin that we don't always think about. Let's imagine that we have denied Europe everything you have listed and ... what's next? Should all workers producing all these "goods" be fired as unnecessary? Or how?
        It turns out that this is a double-edged sword. It's the same with rocket engines. which we sold to mattress makers. They used these engines to launch spy satellites that spied on us.
        It was possible not to sell, mattress covers would have found a way out. And what about our workers? After all, we did not need so many such engines. So it turns out - we want and we can hit the enemy, but it turns out we beat ourselves too. And who is more sick is not yet known.
        1. Egoza
          Egoza 29 November 2022 10: 24
          +8
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          So it turns out - we want and we can hit the enemy, but it turns out we beat ourselves too.

          I think they would find a way out. For oneself, relatives - to carry gas through the villages, to reduce the cost of cars (9 of high quality), etc. It would hit the owners - yes. And so ... it's time to switch to socialist rails. )))
          1. Dartik
            Dartik 29 November 2022 20: 43
            0
            Quote: Egoza
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            So it turns out - we want and we can hit the enemy, but it turns out we beat ourselves too.

            I think they would find a way out. For oneself, relatives - to carry gas through the villages, to reduce the cost of cars (9 of high quality), etc. It would hit the owners - yes. And so ... it's time to switch to socialist rails. )))

            The average resident of Europe buys for more cents than the average resident of Russia. There is a tenfold difference, which means more income. And so on. This should have been done in times of peace, not when there was war.
            1. ch28k38
              ch28k38 2 December 2022 20: 03
              0
              I lived under socialism for 48 years. I do not remember the author of the saying that for the experience of socialism it is necessary to choose a country that is not a pity, but I completely agree with him. Human memory is selective, retaining good memories and filtering out bad ones. This explains the flow of nostalgia for socialism, and in my youth I also had a good erection.
          2. Krasnoyarsk
            Krasnoyarsk 29 November 2022 20: 44
            +1
            Quote: Egoza
            I think they would find a way out. For myself, relatives - to carry gas through the villages,

            As for finding a way out, this, as you understand, is easy to say. And gas in the villages ... So I go to one village ...
            18 km from the regional center in which there is a gas pipeline. It is not easy to carry gas to this village - there are forests, ravines, a river, and the inhabitants, in the winter, i.е. without summer residents, 62 people. And there are countless such villages in Russia.
            But that's not all. In such small villages, mostly pensioners live. Will they be able to make gas heating for themselves, even taking into account the fact that a pipe will be brought to the house for free? But that's just for home. And in the house, and the boiler, and batteries with pipes inside the house, and work? I think that our pensioners, myself such, are not so rich. Therefore, they are content with a gas-balloon installation. Yes, big ones, so to speak. in promising villages, of course, gas must be brought. Otherwise, shame.
            Quote: Egoza
            And so ... it's time to switch to socialist rails. )))

            Who would argue, I will not. For with two hands - FOR.
            1. ch28k38
              ch28k38 2 December 2022 20: 06
              0
              The socialist rails stubbornly lead to a dead end!
        2. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 29 November 2022 10: 46
          +2
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Should all workers producing all these "goods" be fired as unnecessary?

          Hello! hi Well, why immediately fired? You can supply all this, but with the condition of obtaining a real equivalent of the cost. In addition, it is necessary to develop our own industry, and not the industry of the West.
          1. Krasnoyarsk
            Krasnoyarsk 29 November 2022 21: 00
            0
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Hello!

            And good health to you! hi
            Quote: Ingvar 72

            You can supply all this, but with the condition of obtaining a real equivalent of the cost.

            So the "real equivalent? Sanctions have been imposed. Therefore, barter will not work. What do we need from them? High-tech products, microelectronics and means of production. But we understand that they won’t even sell it to us at exorbitant prices. Personally, I see no way out but to take " evergreens" and invest in the development of industry. But, I understand economics even less than organic chemistry.
            1. Ingvar 72
              Ingvar 72 29 November 2022 21: 48
              0
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              Personally, I see no way out but to take "evergreens" and invest in industrial development

              Why do we need green funds for the development of industry, if we cannot buy machine tools and equipment on them? belay It is necessary to monitor market conditions, without which the West cannot do it either. And it cannot replace our grain, fertilizers, ammonia. That is why they remove them from the sanctions, kind of like doing us a favor. hi
              1. Krasnoyarsk
                Krasnoyarsk 29 November 2022 22: 02
                0
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                And it cannot replace our grain, fertilizers, ammonia. That is why they remove them from the sanctions, kind of like doing us a favor.

                That's right, but what do they pay for it? Really rubles? Still no - dollars and euros. Why do we need them? If you can’t buy anything other than bananas on them? I don't understand any of this.
                1. Ingvar 72
                  Ingvar 72 30 November 2022 06: 41
                  0
                  Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                  That's right, but what do they pay for it? Really rubles?

                  That's right, and that's why barter conditions are needed.
    4. smart ass
      smart ass 29 November 2022 10: 10
      0
      If we are terrorists, then we need to be friends with Kim, Afghanistan and Iran, this is our gang
    5. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 29 November 2022 16: 58
      0
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism"

      It is necessary to pass a law on the announcement of the US and the EU-sponsors of idiocy. wassat
    6. Real Pilot
      Real Pilot 30 November 2022 01: 38
      0
      As Maria Zakharova said, "if Russia is a sponsor of terrorism, then the European Parliament is a sponsor of idiocy."
      And it's hard not to agree with her!
      1. Monster_Fat
        Monster_Fat 30 November 2022 02: 22
        +1
        "Fear of retaliatory measures" (quote from the article) ... I'm embarrassed to ask, what kind of retaliatory measures? Can I announce a list of Russia's "retaliatory measures" to Western sanctions? Please do not touch Voronezh, he gets it anyway ...
  2. Kuroneko
    Kuroneko 29 November 2022 05: 35
    +10
    All these gestures are made with the expectation of at least a visible "legitimization" of the future confiscation (that is, outright robbery) of our assets now frozen by the West.
    Like, robbing a "terrorist" is a charitable deed and not robbery at all.
    Everything goes along this path.
    1. krops777
      krops777 29 November 2022 05: 51
      +8
      All these gestures are made with the expectation of at least a visible "legitimization" of the future confiscation (that is, outright robbery) of our assets now frozen by the West.


      The whole expectation is that we will continue to play honest and gullible Papuans, and they are white gentlemen in pith helmets and will continue to suck in all sorts of game as they always did, but on the contrary, we need to increase the degree of inadequacy, it’s interesting what they will do with "inadequate "and an intractable neighbor with a nuclear club in his hands.
    2. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 29 November 2022 09: 11
      -1
      All these gestures are made with the expectation of at least a visible "legitimization" of the future confiscation (that is, outright robbery) of our assets now frozen by the West.
      In fact, this is a trifle. I have been writing for a long time that everything that the West does fits into the paradigm of preparing burghers for war with the Russian Federation. Like, in the Russian Federation, terrorists, terrorists are not people, Russians are not people, etc. The new European Reich will not refuse to make another Drang nach Osten, with this it will solve many problems of the USA and a few of its own. But this is one of the options. A more realistic alternative is a completely obedient Russian Federation that has surrendered control over nuclear weapons and is threatening China.
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 29 November 2022 05: 38
    +12
    The article is like a toast, only long. Well, let's drink, now for this. drinks What to whine? The main thing is that our "beloved" "partner" did not recognize the United States .. Everything will be fine, the author and the Victory will be obsessed and we will restore the country and fly into space and even build a nuclear power plant .. Voooot ... eyes and dried up from tears ...
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 29 November 2022 06: 01
      +7
      Let's return to the question from the title - what to do now? Nothing. Focus and ignore the clowns who call themselves European parliamentarians.
      so many dogs were hung on us that it doesn’t matter, one more or less ... The USSR, according to Reagan, was also an "evil empire", and nothing, they lived.
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 29 November 2022 06: 10
        +7
        was, according to Reagan, an "evil empire", and nothing, they lived.
        About the same .. It will not be worse. They will reconcile and call their daughter Vasya.
      2. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 29 November 2022 07: 18
        0
        Quote: Aerodrome
        The USSR, according to Reagan, was also an "evil empire", and nothing, they lived.

        little we quote Putin: the US is an empire of lies. So at least Putin himself came up with Reagan as an actor.
        1. alekseykabanets
          alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 07: 31
          +5
          Quote: aybolyt678
          little we quote Putin: the US is an empire of lies.

          It’s in vain that you dragged him here, otherwise we’ll start quoting him, and there, with the truth, it’s also “somehow not very”.)))))
          1. aybolyt678
            aybolyt678 29 November 2022 07: 42
            +4
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            and there, with the truth, it is also "somehow not very".)))))

            True, this is a lady who everyone has her own. At least the USSR to call the empire of evil is biased. But the US is an empire of lies - very accurately.
            1. alekseykabanets
              alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 07: 54
              +9
              Quote: aybolyt678
              True, this is a lady who everyone has her own.

              The truth is always alone! I said I won’t change the constitution, which means I won’t change it, I said there won’t be a pension reform, which means it won’t, and so on. on the page listing his lies will go away.
              Quote: aybolyt678
              At least the USSR to call the empire of evil is biased. But the US is an empire of lies - very accurately.

              Did I dispute it? I just wrote that in vain you are reminded of Putin's quotes, next to the word lie.
              1. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 29 November 2022 08: 32
                +1
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                The truth is always alone!

                Truth?? wassat Truth is a philosophical category defined as an opinion confirmed by known facts. The absolute category is Truth. I think when Putin made his promises, he believed himself.
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 29 November 2022 08: 41
                  -1
                  Quote: aybolyt678
                  Truth is a philosophical category defined as an opinion confirmed by known facts. The absolute category is Truth.

                  Practice is the criterion of truth.



                  About lying or not lying. It all depends on who heard what. everyone hears what he wants to hear, and when what he has not heard is put into practice, it seems that he lied...
                2. kor1vet1974
                  kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 08: 52
                  +6
                  when Putin made his promises, he believed himself.
                  Did you deceive yourself? So? Engaged in self-deception?
                  1. Serg65
                    Serg65 29 November 2022 09: 24
                    -2
                    Quote: kor1vet1974
                    Did you deceive yourself?

                    And how do you feel about Lenin and Stalin?
                    1. User_neydobniu
                      User_neydobniu 29 November 2022 10: 02
                      +1
                      And how do you feel about Lenin and Stalin?

                      For the cheers-"patriots" all the failures of the modern government come down to Lenin and Stalin laughing
                      1. Serg65
                        Serg65 29 November 2022 11: 09
                        -1
                        Quote from: User_neydobniu
                        For the cheers-"patriots" all the failures of the modern government come down to Lenin and Stalin

                        Well, ignorant users cannot even understand that Lenin and Stalin, like Putin, are primarily politicians!
                      2. alekseykabanets
                        alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 14: 11
                        +3
                        Quote from: User_neydobniu
                        For the cheers-"patriots" all the failures of the modern government come down to Lenin and Stalin

                        Yes, I still remember the Polovtsy and the Pechenegs, so not only Lenin and Stalin planted bombs.))))
                    2. kor1vet1974
                      kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 10: 22
                      +1
                      And how do you feel about Lenin and Stalin?
                      Lenin and Stalin, are they setting GDP on the right path?" All night, the light was on in the mausoleum. The GDP asked Lenin for advice. laughing
                      1. Serg65
                        Serg65 29 November 2022 11: 12
                        +1
                        Quote: kor1vet1974
                        Lenin and Stalin, setting the GDP on the right path?

                        Were you also a member of KVN? Wait, wait... what ..baaa... Volodymyr Oleksandrovich, is that you???
                3. alekseykabanets
                  alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 09: 03
                  +5
                  Quote: aybolyt678
                  I think when Putin made his promises, he believed himself.

                  Here's the damn thing! That is, he did not lie, since he believed himself? It turns out that if I tell a girl that I love, I say that I’m getting married, and after sex I can send her away and it won’t be considered a lie if I believed myself when I promised to marry.))) You have an interesting position, a real male position .)))) A man is the master of his word, he wants to give it, he wants to take it back.))) Or "this is another"?
                  1. aybolyt678
                    aybolyt678 29 November 2022 09: 31
                    -6
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    It turns out if I tell a girl that I love, I say that I'm getting married,

                    That's right, after you get married, get a mistress .... Love is promised for life, but for example, I already have a fourth wife request
                  2. Boris55
                    Boris55 29 November 2022 09: 36
                    -9
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Here's the damn thing! I mean, didn't lie.
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    That's right, after

                    What do you think he screwed up? Give an example.
                    Let's take a look at what you heard and what he said.
                    1. Boris55
                      Boris55 29 November 2022 11: 03
                      -4
                      For two and a half hours, no one could give a specific example where he lied ... Thank you. This only confirms that Putin is not lying. hi
                      1. alekseykabanets
                        alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 13: 02
                        +5
                        Quote: Boris55
                        For two and a half hours, no one could give a specific example where he lied ... Thank you. This only confirms that Putin is not lying.

                        I have nothing else to do, but how, at the first request of impatient users, to drop all their business and tell the obvious things? Have you been banned on Google for an hour? And on YouTube? Type the appropriate query into the search bar and you will be happy, for example, at least

                        Then on your own, okay?
                      2. runway-1
                        runway-1 29 November 2022 20: 24
                        +2
                        Hard work for these "believing" gentlemen! They have to jump out of their pants to turn everything upside down (and so every day many times). Poor fellows, it's hard for our professional "patriots". And you use their rusty sickle to... winked
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. Boris55
                        Boris55 30 November 2022 08: 54
                        0
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        I have nothing else to do
                        Quote: WFP-1
                        Hard work for these "believing" gentlemen!

                        about pension reform. Do you think Putin accepted it?
                        Have you seen the Constitution of the Russian Federation? Have you read?

                        Article 105
                        1. Federal laws are adopted by the State Duma.

                        The President is the guarantor of the Constitution, and in order to exercise this right, he puts his signature (or not, if the law contradicts the Constitution) under the law adopted by the Duma and approved by the Federation Council.

                        After the law is published in the media, it comes into force.

                        The law was adopted by the Duma in which the constitutional majority belongs to the United Russia, whose leader is D. A. Medaedev.

                        It is Medvedev, not Putin, who adopted this Law!!!

                        This is like an example of what someone drove into your head and what it really is.

                        Q.E.D! hi
                      5. User_neydobniu
                        User_neydobniu 30 November 2022 10: 24
                        -1
                        It is Medvedev, not Putin, who adopted this Law!!!

                        So, what is next ? What is said?
                        As long as I am the President, such a decision will not be made.

                        Putin is the president - the president, the decision is made - it is accepted, and by whom it doesn't matter to me personally.
                        You are now dear cheers, trying to prove only what someone promises that they are not able to fulfill. Those. deliberately mislead voters negative
                      6. Boris55
                        Boris55 30 November 2022 11: 14
                        -1
                        The President does not adopt laws - this is not his area of ​​competence.
                        Who made this decision is the main question that does not interest you.
                      7. User_neydobniu
                        User_neydobniu 30 November 2022 12: 00
                        -1
                        The President does not adopt laws - this is not his area of ​​competence.

                        And if he does not accept anything, then what does he promise? Or is it his sphere of competence to promise? lol
        2. kor1vet1974
          kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 08: 49
          +4
          little we quote Putin: the US is an empire of lies.
          It's time to publish quotes. And introduce it into the school curriculum for study in kindergartens. In addition, this quote book must be studied at all enterprises and passed tests. Did not pass, lost bonuses and allowances. That will be the ideology. Crying on the site, the ideology is not enough. smile This lacks intelligence, not ideology. Attached to Putin's quote book, publish Medvedev's quotes. As an introductory material, but not mandatory.
          1. Vikxnumx
            Vikxnumx 29 November 2022 11: 43
            +1
            It's time to publish quotes. And enter into the school curriculum for study in kindergartens.

            And then we will catch up with China???
            Three hands "FOR" !!!
    2. Mikhail Sidorov
      Mikhail Sidorov 29 November 2022 06: 48
      0
      Obsessed with victory

      Certainly
      and restore the country

      Well, what if we break it in Ukraine, then we will restore it as without it
      and fly into space

      Already flying nothing new
      and even build a nuclear power plant ..

      Rosatom builds around the world. How hot cakes go. yes
  4. Ka-52
    Ka-52 29 November 2022 05: 43
    +6
    tell me in what year the European parliamentarians recognized the United States, Great Britain and other countries of the coalition for the destruction of the state infrastructure of Yugoslavia - bridges, television companies, factories, oil storage facilities and electrical substations, as well as civilians? What did I remember request
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 29 November 2022 07: 54
      +2
      Quote: Ka-52
      tell me in what year the European parliamentarians recognized the “state sponsor of terrorism

      They write the rules of the game. The Russian Federation is not the USSR, and plays on strangers
      1. Ka-52
        Ka-52 29 November 2022 08: 37
        0
        They write the rules of the game. The Russian Federation is not the USSR, and plays on strangers

        Well, if they started talking about the USSR, then how did the USSR react to the treacherous US invasion of Grenada and Reagan's declaration of the USSR as an "evil empire" in the same year? You imagine it as if everything was different back then. Yes, there was nothing, it was all the same
  5. Grossvater
    Grossvater 29 November 2022 06: 27
    +4
    Any idea brought to the absolute turns into its negation. The more than sound economic unification of Europe has turned into a complete grotesque. The regional committee of the CPSU of the late eighties smokes nervously behind that dumpster.
    What to do? Yes put on them!
  6. Paul Siebert
    Paul Siebert 29 November 2022 06: 28
    +4
    Yes, the world has gone crazy.
    European suicides are rushing the nuclear apocalypse, simultaneously cutting out their economy and industry.
    "The barn burned down - burn the hut too!"
  7. Gardamir
    Gardamir 29 November 2022 06: 30
    +10
    Terpil have all who want. For example, when Soviet monuments are being demolished all over Europe, what did the rulers of Russia do to protect the memory of their ancestors? Nothing right. Endured.
    On the other hand, the "sponsors of terrorism" sponsor the whole of Europe with their oil and gas.
    1. alekseykabanets
      alekseykabanets 29 November 2022 07: 33
      +5
      Quote: Gardamir
      On the other hand, the "sponsors of terrorism" sponsor the whole of Europe with their oil and gas.

      So money does not smell!
      1. kor1vet1974
        kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 08: 58
        +1
        So money does not smell!
        From the word, absolutely. laughing
    2. kor1vet1974
      kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 08: 55
      +4
      For example, when Soviet monuments are being demolished all over Europe
      So in Russia, Soviet monuments are being demolished, slowly .. In this we are united with Europe. This is called de-Sovietization and decommunization.
  8. Mikhail Sidorov
    Mikhail Sidorov 29 November 2022 06: 32
    0
    It is not clear whether Russia is now considered a terrorist country, but even these accusations seem very heavy.

    What is it ... Yes, I don’t care, and about 95 percent of Russians think the same way.
  9. Mikhail Sidorov
    Mikhail Sidorov 29 November 2022 06: 43
    +2
    Wrote, reasoned and...
    Let's return to the question from the title - what to do now? Nothing.

    When I read the title, another thought immediately came to mind in the morning.
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now
    to attach something to the mare ...
  10. nikolaevskiy78
    nikolaevskiy78 29 November 2022 07: 16
    +3
    In my opinion, all these dances around being recognized as a "sponsor of terrorism" have the ultimate goal
    a) legalization of frozen assets
    b) reshaping the UN format
    If everything is more or less clear with the first question, then in the second case everything is somewhat more complicated. At one time, participation in the UN was de facto limited by Iran, which bore such a label on itself. But Iran is one thing, and the founder, a member of the Security Council, who is supposed to participate in all committees, departments, organizations, etc., is another. It is impossible to prohibit participation directly, but you can use the specifics of the visa regime and in practice reduce the number of participants in delegations, the number of technical staff, and the composition of commissions. Moreover, there will be problems with hiring people on the ground who are unlikely to agree to receive a salary from such an employer when you are 100500 times checked by the FBI.

    Similar work is systematically going on in the line of embassies and consular offices. Today, the UN is under the control of dear Western partners, if not at the level of the General Assembly (although everything is sad there), then at the level of the internal organization of work, for sure. In general, there is no complete alternative to this disgrace in the world, different formats are only adding up. But what we have, we have.

    In general, the strategic goal is to change the UN, limit our participation and influence there, the operational one is our assets.
    1. kor1vet1974
      kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 09: 03
      -1
      In general, the strategic goal is to change the UN, limit our participation and influence there, the operational one is our assets.
      The United States, they will intercede for Russia, you will see, despite the difficult relationship, they need Russia. And you can forget about assets for a long time ..
      1. nikolaevskiy78
        nikolaevskiy78 29 November 2022 09: 10
        +1
        A lot depends on purely tactical (by their standards, of course) combinations. It is necessary to tighten through the IAEA - one story. To cover up the issues of biolaboratories is another, to write out a bad resolution is a third. In general, this is a kind of marker of their policy. On it, you can even build some forecasts, with a strong desire))
        1. kor1vet1974
          kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 09: 42
          +1
          A lot depends on purely tactical (by their standards, of course) combinations.
          Of course, we have forgotten here that Russia has been friends and not bad friends with Europe and especially with the USA since 1991. We forgot the congratulatory telegrams addressed to the EBN in October 1993 .. The parliament shot the joy that was in the democratic world of the EBN. just like them. It’s just with Russia, they really don’t want to share something or they force them to give it away, already the last one .. Hence the graters.
  11. Rustic
    Rustic 29 November 2022 07: 16
    -1
    Let's return to the question from the title - what to do now?
    Like what? Recognize the European Parliament as a fascist perverted organization. Luckily there's a lot of evidence. At the same time, it is possible to prescribe a universal treatment. Lobotomy with a lead pill.
  12. yuriy55
    yuriy55 29 November 2022 07: 18
    +5
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now

    Stop trading with terrorist countries and their sponsors. Forget the way there! Expel all the ambassadors of the recognizing countries!
    And, in general, this talkative country sat up in safety on its islands:
    In Britain there
    Fog and deceit -
    British brethren
    Crazy, according to our concepts.
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 November 2022 07: 26
    +2
    So what's now
    Yes, forget about it and continue to live on, tightening the screws on the initiators of this resolution.
  14. Kuroneko
    Kuroneko 29 November 2022 07: 33
    +3
    Quote: Ka-52
    tell me in what year the European parliamentarians recognized the United States, Great Britain and other countries of the coalition for the destruction of the state infrastructure of Yugoslavia - bridges, television companies, factories, oil storage facilities and electrical substations, as well as civilians? What did I remember request

    Well, the European Parliament is right about something. Indeed, Russia has been sponsoring terrorists for decades: in fact, the EU itself continues to sponsor Ukraine even now.
    1. kor1vet1974
      kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 09: 07
      -2
      Well, the European Parliament is right about something. the EU itself and even now continues to sponsor Ukraine.
      Roughly speaking, a thief, a thief, accused of stealing. laughing
  15. Sotskiy
    Sotskiy 29 November 2022 07: 36
    +9
    .... local lawmakers act with some kind of manic obsession ....

    lol
    If you take the words out of context and apply them to our homegrown legislators, will there be a difference?
    According to the adoption, in recent years, of anti-people laws in line with: "Let's take the worst thing that exists in the world and accept it in the Russian Federation, because we need to be equal to the European" partners ". In our country, capitalism must be steered away from paternalism." In my opinion, even the "partners" were surpassed in all respects.
    By the way, the idea of ​​our authorities about a united Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok is no longer relevant, or are we waiting for the lifting of sanctions in order to again merge in the arms of "partners" who recognized us as "terrorists"? wink
    And yes, few people pay attention to what is happening there in the legislative sphere of the state with the capitalist system, since no one is waiting for positive changes for the ordinary population. And according to this, the people do just that, as the author suggests "... to concentrate and not pay attention to clowns ...". Not on those, not on these. wink
    1. Mishka78
      Mishka78 29 November 2022 10: 34
      +2
      Quote: Sovetskiy
      concentrate and not pay attention to the clowns ... ". Neither those nor these

      They really don't care. But it's hard not to pay attention to our own... They approve laws for us. Either pensions are cut and frozen, then a “completely new and correct” constitution is adopted, then some other muck is stirred up ...
      They consider and adopt 50-60 new laws (well, or amendments) a day. For me, this is a complete PPC.
      https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/planning/oz_event_report/2022/11/24
      here is the last available report on the work for 1 day.
      And we call them slackers. What are you speaking about. People plow like hell. There is so much to know, be able to, keep in mind, take an active part, discuss, take care of your electorate ..

      For example, they took and increased the age of survival from 18 to 22 years.
      Those. if before, like an uncle, I retired at 60 and my savings were split into 227 pieces, now, after leaving at 65, they will divide them into 270. It's fun.
      If in numbers, then something like this.
      It was: a pension at 60, savings, say, 300. The payment period is 000 months.
      those. after 60 years, I start to receive 1321,5 rubles. supplements to the insurance pension. Well, according to the plan, I should die by the age of 78. I won’t die - the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation will be upset, but it will pay.
      It became: pension at 65, savings are the same 300. The payment period is 000 months.
      those. after 65 years, I start to receive 1111,1 rubles. supplements to the insurance pension. Well, according to the new plan, I should already die by the age of 87. Survive, to put it mildly, units. And so the Motherland represented by the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in net profit :)
      1. Sotskiy
        Sotskiy 29 November 2022 11: 41
        +1
        Quote: Mishka78
        Motherland represented by the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in net profit :)

        laughing I focused on the "capitalist state".
        Under Soviet rule, I don’t remember such a formation as the RF PF. wink
        ... But it's hard not to pay attention to our own ... They approve laws for us ...

        Tyk they approve of them in favor of those who "chose" them there wink
        How are you going to influence the "electors"?
        They have 90% of the country's assets and share them voluntarily, I suspect that they will not. wink
      2. nepunamemuk
        nepunamemuk 29 November 2022 16: 55
        +1
        there are already much more savings at 65
        and those who did not live to 65 will add to those who survived (
        counted shed tears, but already more than 1250 scars have accumulated ...
  16. couch
    couch 29 November 2022 07: 39
    -8
    and who is stopping us from gathering the OKDB and recognizing the entire "epopa" as a sponsor of terrorism, for the bombing of Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya, Iraq, etc. And in general, it seems to me that it's time to stop responding to patients from the 6th ward, there is little for them schizophrenics came up with
  17. Nikolay Malyugin
    Nikolay Malyugin 29 November 2022 07: 44
    +1
    Europe has not changed. We are changing. The fact that we joined the ECHR is a mistake, or what? When someone talks about our previous mistakes, you hear in response - "Well, unless you take everything into account." We have many think tanks in any field. And they get a lot of money for their work. Isn't it time to ask them for a real job.
    1. Mikhail Sidorov
      Mikhail Sidorov 29 November 2022 07: 53
      +2
      We have many think tanks in any field. And they get a lot of money for their work. Isn't it time to ask them for a real job.

      That ours, that foreign analytics is not up to par is a fact.
  18. kor1vet1974
    kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 07: 48
    -3
    Let's return to the question from the title - what to do now? Nothing. Focus and ignore the clowns who call themselves European parliamentarians.
    In place of real clowns, offended for such a comparison. smile
    1. uyrii
      uyrii 29 November 2022 07: 57
      -1
      it does not happen that ALL are "clowns", and ONE is not ....
      1. kor1vet1974
        kor1vet1974 29 November 2022 09: 11
        -2
        We are talking about comments about real clowns
  19. ODERVIT
    ODERVIT 29 November 2022 07: 59
    -1
    Yes well them, these Europeans. The dog barks, the caravan moves on.
    1. uyrii
      uyrii 29 November 2022 08: 10
      -1
      only where and to whom, if there are almost only “dogs” around (494 deputies voted for the document, 58 voted against and the remaining 44 abstained.)
    2. Ulan.1812
      Ulan.1812 29 November 2022 10: 58
      -1
      Quote: ODERVIT
      Yes well them, these Europeans. The dog barks, the caravan moves on.

      Wrong, defeatist position. Answer and answer hard.
      Answer by attacking. Declare this sharaga terrorists, well, or something else in this vein.
  20. steelmaker
    steelmaker 29 November 2022 08: 08
    -1
    " unanimously adopted a resolution recognizing Russia as a "state sponsor of terrorism and a state using means of terrorism"
    Nothing to do
    for the sake of dumb people.
    We are a great country
    We won the wars.
    By wealth and people
    We are the first in line
    And under Putin
    We are like an inscription on a fence!
    1. uyrii
      uyrii 29 November 2022 08: 14
      0
      they were great when, TOGETHER with the other 14 republics, they won the Second World War, and not when everyone was betrayed and destroyed for the "legs of the bush".
  21. n-Stozhar
    n-Stozhar 29 November 2022 08: 15
    -5
    As it were, the Roffians have a notion that, as a member of the WTO, and observing many agreements, including a banking system independent of the authorities of the Russian Federation, salaries, including military personnel, are built from raw materials and goods equivalent to those exported abroad, the simplest processing. it is written in the article. I am personally against the export, through whom are they supplied, Hungary?, Oil products for the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the first place? they opened the old automatic perimeter systems ..... well, who knows .. I wonder where Abram will spend the unlocked computer zeros by the seven ... for Kherson ... on a bunker in New Zealand? Or a superpurery yacht.
  22. AdAstra
    AdAstra 29 November 2022 09: 03
    +5
    How to do what? Supply them with even more gas, oil, titanium and other aluminum.
    1. sadam2
      sadam2 29 November 2022 13: 10
      -2
      Of course, it sounds nice to send gas to the villages to distribute grain for free to Africans ... for a minute, that volley of 100 missiles on infrastructure costs almost a billion green dollars, Siluanov is crying for the next budget deficit of a trillion rubles, and military spending has doubled for 2 years. ...
      What means are you going to continue the war with?
      1. AdAstra
        AdAstra 29 November 2022 13: 24
        +2
        That’s exactly how I see the people’s commissar of finance comes, or whatever such a position was called to Comrade Stalin and says: “Comrade Stalin, we’ve been here with the war, it’s a joke to say a volley of all the guns of the Belorussian Front is XXX million. Maybe we’ll sell Germany oil there, alloying components for armored steel and Italy and Japan what do they need there. Otherwise, what funds are you going to continue the war with?"
        1. sadam2
          sadam2 29 November 2022 13: 47
          -4
          Well, that's how it works.)
          Did I understand correctly that you are waiving your pension to the MO fund ...? After all, then on the Belarusian front, in your example, they didn’t know what a pension was?
  23. Maks1995
    Maks1995 29 November 2022 09: 16
    +3
    Well, what did you want?
    HPP.

    The media are happily describing strikes on a civilian power structure, there are videos of arrivals at administrative buildings ...
    Straight from the old song: "Kyiv was bombed, they announced to us ..."

    Lavrov did not acquire allies, only partners .... even Belarus does not recognize either Crimea or the LDNR.
    HPP.
  24. Aleprok
    Aleprok 29 November 2022 09: 37
    +1
    the dog barks - the wind carries) they even with ... s in the eyes - everything is God's dew
  25. Nitarius
    Nitarius 29 November 2022 09: 44
    0
    tomorrow they will come up with something else .. that we should believe in everything or something .. as they were SHARIKOV .. so they remain! no mind .. no fantasy
  26. antiaircrafter
    antiaircrafter 29 November 2022 10: 09
    +1
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now

    Like what? Terrorize!
  27. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  28. Ulan.1812
    Ulan.1812 29 November 2022 10: 54
    +1
    What to do? And the fact that our government for some reason does not want to do. Start by declaring the Kyiv regime terrorist.
    And further down the list.
    We don't OFFICIALLY charge anyone at all.
    USA for all their crimes, England too.
    For example, why didn't we bring claims and accusations against England for the poisoning and kidnapping of Russian citizen Yulia Skripal?
    And there are a lot of such accusations.
    The same France for crimes in Africa.
    But our Foreign Ministry only makes excuses, instead of attacking and blaming.
    Let them make excuses.
    And you will listen to how Nebenzya mumbles something monotonously on a piece of paper in the UN Security Council and becomes uncomfortable for our diplomacy.
  29. rocket757
    rocket757 29 November 2022 10: 57
    0
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now
    . They themselves climbed into the bear's den, and now, "unanimously" they began to be afraid .... figs on them, fortunately, we were not the only ones who put this fig on them.
  30. Alexfly
    Alexfly 29 November 2022 11: 07
    -2
    now it's time to start sponsoring in full and let's see how the EU AND Britain will sing with the hegemon ..
  31. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 29 November 2022 11: 29
    +1
    Both the USA and the EU (which was formerly the USSR) need a contrast to exist, because they position themselves as a qualitatively better model. This contrast must be maintained constantly - at other times it can, of course, subside somewhat, but due to a combination of conditions that can result in propaganda gesheft, it will definitely flare up. All this "chip" has been known since the time of the ancient Egyptians or Chinese, who positioned their kingdoms as the only windows of order in the ocean of chaos and barbarism.

    The more the EU will have to make difficult decisions at home (and use tools for suppressing rights) - the more they will focus on the horror-nightmare that we or someone else "represents". Resp. we will use (and use) the same dull line - creating the image of Europe-USA as an endless sodom and debt-laden bums.
    Contrast as a tool for influencing the people's brain will not disappear anywhere. We do not have any magical passes and spells that we could use to stop this, it is also worth considering the cumulative effect of the "line" on which the careers of more than one thousand politicians are already supported.

    Beyond the borders of these crazy games with the townsfolk scratching their faces in indignation and anger - those who hobbled - will hobble further. Those who have ridden there will continue to ride. Everything will be "almost as it was" in the world of bets and chips - so is it worth it to get excited by the ripples on the water in a glass? No, it's not worth it.
  32. solar
    solar 29 November 2022 11: 40
    0
    Despite the insignificant "exhaust" of all statements

    There is an old story that allegedly when Stalin was told about the Pope, he asked in response, "How many divisions does he have!"
    Underestimating the influence of reputation on other aspects of life is an old tradition in Russia.
    No one connects such statements with the volume of military assistance to Ukraine, for example.
    Up to a certain point, this really didn’t matter much, but ignoring it for a long time led to the transition of quantity into quality: ((
    As students say, before the second year you work for the student's record, after the second year, the student's record works for you.
  33. evgen1221
    evgen1221 29 November 2022 13: 02
    +1
    It is possible, though with difficulty, to expel the Middle Ages from Europe, but Europe from the Middle Ages is impossible. And it’s the Inquisition that comes around to them, if they didn’t burn beautiful women en masse, you look and look at life with different eyes.
  34. Boris Sergeev
    Boris Sergeev 29 November 2022 18: 24
    0
    Spit in your eyes, and we will drive the gas, as if nothing had happened.
  35. sent26
    sent26 29 November 2022 19: 17
    0
    Do what you started in February.
    Denazification, the liberation of Russian lands from the Nazis.
  36. Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
    Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira 29 November 2022 19: 30
    +2
    Parents number 1 and 2, "moms" and "dads" of the same sex, 52 gender types...?!?!
    Here "these" declared us terrorists?!
    I don't even know, is this recognition of our merits and special grace, or self-condemnation of "them"?
    Personally, I don’t care: I don’t know about myself and our jambs, but paying attention to “these” is not respecting myself!
  37. Dartik
    Dartik 29 November 2022 20: 35
    +1
    2013: Discussion of cancellations of visas for Russians
    2022: Recognition of Russia as a sponsor of terrorism.
    Blimey. I'm afraid to imagine what will happen in 2030.
  38. Plate
    Plate 29 November 2022 21: 05
    0
    Russia is a "sponsor of terrorism". So what's now

    To do nothing. I have not heard that European legislation automatically obliges to some actions or prohibitions in relation to "sponsors of terrorism", so in fact it does not mean anything. Dummy. If you answer, then the same dummy.
    The United States has measures that must be taken without fail in relation to countries that have the status of "sponsor of terrorism." And, mind you, the United States is not considering giving Russia such a status.
    Coincidence?
  39. Vladimir Dmitrievich Burtsev
    Vladimir Dmitrievich Burtsev 29 November 2022 21: 12
    0
    Why does Russia not initiate an international investigation into the murder of thousands of civilians in the Donbas by Bandera, including Russian citizens? There is the SCO, there is the CSTO. Why is nothing being done there to fight the Bandera fascists?! All because of the passivity of our Russian politicians! Why are our politicians offended by Zelensky and Bandera for slander? Zelensky's gang will continue to sling mud at Russia until our politicians start doing business and defend Russia's interests in courts and in international military tribunals!!!! What are our human rights defenders paid for? For the fact that they are sitting in their offices releasing remarks in response to the provocations of Zelensky and his accomplices? So no one listens to these remarks and does not take them seriously all over the world.
  40. t200404
    t200404 30 November 2022 00: 31
    +1
    Only Russia itself (including the leadership) can prevent Russia from being a prosperous country, and whoever says something about it somewhere can shove themselves deeper
  41. Zolotse
    Zolotse 30 November 2022 13: 23
    +1
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Quote: Egoza
    I think they would find a way out. For myself, relatives - to carry gas through the villages,

    As for finding a way out, this, as you understand, is easy to say. And gas in the villages ... So I go to one village ...
    18 km from the regional center in which there is a gas pipeline. It is not easy to carry gas to this village - there are forests, ravines, a river, and the inhabitants, in the winter, i.е. without summer residents, 62 people. And there are countless such villages in Russia.
    But that's not all. In such small villages, mostly pensioners live. Will they be able to make gas heating for themselves, even taking into account the fact that a pipe will be brought to the house for free? But that's just for home. And in the house, and the boiler, and batteries with pipes inside the house, and work? I think that our pensioners, myself such, are not so rich. Therefore, they are content with a gas-balloon installation. Yes, big ones, so to speak. in promising villages, of course, gas must be brought. Otherwise, shame.
    Quote: Egoza
    And so ... it's time to switch to socialist rails. )))

    Who would argue, I will not. For with two hands - FOR.

    We live in a village, 80 km from St. Petersburg, the capital of Gazprom. Villages along the highway go one by one. There is no gas. The public is solvent, more than half of the houses belong to St. Petersburg. Everyone dreams of pipeline gas. No GAS!!! And in practically tiny villages in Moldova or Estonia, it has been since Soviet times. And you will continue to argue that gas is not profitable for us? It's just that, of course, you can't fool us like Europeans, Why spoil Russians with gas - it's better to burn it.
  42. runway-1
    runway-1 30 November 2022 19: 55
    +2
    Quote from: User_neydobniu
    It is Medvedev, not Putin, who adopted this Law!!!

    So, what is next ? What is said?
    As long as I am the President, such a decision will not be made.

    Putin is the president - the president, the decision is made - it is accepted, and by whom it doesn't matter to me personally.
    You are now dear cheers, trying to prove only what someone promises that they are not able to fulfill. Those. deliberately mislead voters negative
    "Boris Leontievich" apparently has such a hobby - "not knowing" that the Presidential Administration and the Government may be initiators appearance of bills. And there is no doubt that in such cases they are adopted and become laws. Our Internet "guardian" turns on the "don't know" mode that the President may not sign any law And for this case, a special procedure is prescribed ... winked
  43. Dkuznecov
    Dkuznecov 30 November 2022 21: 14
    0
    All this is reminiscent of a fire in a madhouse.
    I won't draw conclusions
    because the foam - shaft.
    I'll wait for the dry residue, then we'll rack our brains,
    who is to blame, what to do, and who will rake in the neck.
  44. Vasily Novikov
    Vasily Novikov 1 December 2022 17: 44
    +1
    To declare, in turn, to the whole world the United States as a sponsor of terrorists, which they really are.
    Nebenzya let him announce from the rostrum of the UN.