Military Review

Peru needs Russian fighters

65
Peru needs Russian fightersPeru's air force needs aircraft such as the fifth-generation Russian fighter T-50 (promising aviation Frontline Aviation Complex, PAK FA), claims the author of an article published in the local Generacion magazine.

It notes that three PAK FA fighters would be enough to deter a potential enemy. In the event of war, they will be able to fully control the airspace, ensuring that the Peruvian MiG-29 and Mirage-2000 airplanes are capable of delivering targeted and effective strikes to their positions, according to an article entitled "Meet PAK FA ). The plane that should have been bought. "

According to the author of the article, “given the state of Peru’s defense capability, it is necessary to adopt the latest powerful weapon deterrence. "

The publication notes that the 5 generation fighter developed by Sukhoi has high combat effectiveness and is hardly noticeable to radars. The aircraft is able to simultaneously accompany several air and ground targets, the author writes.

According to its technical characteristics, this multifunctional aircraft surpasses the American F-22 Raptor at a lower cost, the newspaper notes.

As reported, three fifth-generation aircraft involved in flight tests in Russia. T-50-4 will join them by the end of the year. Work on the creation of the export version of the fifth-generation fighter - a promising multi-purpose fighter (PMI) - is being carried out jointly with the Republic of India.

The PAK FA program provides for the creation, organization of serial production and adoption of the fifth generation fighter aircraft. This will increase the combat potential of the Russian Air Force grouping, help bring the aviation and related industries to a new production and technical level, give impetus to the development of scientific schools, and ensure a steady load of defense industry enterprises, Interfax notes.

Compared with the fighters of previous generations, the PAK FA has a number of unique features, combining the functions of a strike aircraft and a fighter. The use of composite materials and innovative technologies, the aerodynamic layout of the aircraft, measures to reduce engine visibility provide an unprecedentedly low level of radar, optical and infrared visibility. This makes it possible to significantly increase combat effectiveness in work both on air and ground targets, at any time of the day, in simple and complex weather conditions.
Originator:
http://rus.ruvr.ru
65 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. YARY
    YARY 31 October 2012 11: 24
    +2
    And Burkina Faso needs ....
    And RUSSIA damn the last in line!
    1. Kasym
      Kasym 31 October 2012 15: 09
      +9
      Hello Andrey ! In fact, it was reported that the T-50 would not be exported. Only joint development with the Indians will go abroad.
      And as for the characteristics of the T-50, it’s too early to say, it is only known that the wing area is larger than that of the F-22 (lift is greater). Although I think that it will be better than the American counterpart. It’s already somehow accepted in aviation, at first they will create something, and then our worthy answer - and, as a rule, is better than their NATO counterparts.
      1. crazyrom
        crazyrom 31 October 2012 18: 33
        +1
        This is usually the case. We almost always "catch up", we do after them, but this gives us the advantage to see how they do and do better. And they can no longer abandon their F22 and make F23 even better, and remain with the worst model.
    2. Civil
      Civil 31 October 2012 18: 14
      0
      not enough latinos
      1. Tiburon
        Tiburon 31 October 2012 21: 03
        0
        Peru ?? T-50 ?? They generally beguiled? Yesterday, only they came down from the palm trees, but today, Ima PAKFA serve? who are you going to fight with, Papuans?
    3. Antibrim
      Antibrim 31 October 2012 22: 01
      +1
      Russia needs more of its own aircraft. with us, something everyone is last buying or not buying at all! but why buy it yourself)) we will fight with a bare ass)
  2. Igor
    Igor 31 October 2012 11: 28
    -8
    According to the author of the article, "given the state of Peru's defense capability, it is necessary to adopt the latest powerful deterrent weapon."


    From 3 T-50s there will be little sense, it is better to take 6 Su-30s, although at least 200 pieces are needed for the state’s defense capability.
    1. Retx
      Retx 31 October 2012 11: 35
      +19
      Quote: Igorek
      From 3 T-50s there will be little sense, it is better to take 6 Su-30s, although at least 200 pieces are needed for the state’s defense capability.

      belay Air Force peru 200 aircraft? with whom should they fight? Everyone perfectly saw what they had done 2 Su 34 in Georgia, according to the situation on the South American continent, I can say that 3 T50s can cause severe troubles to any enemy. Yes, and the plane claims just sweet smile
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 31 October 2012 11: 43
        +13
        There was one Su-34 in Georgia. He crushed Georgia’s electronic warfare systems, and, as they say, he put a rocket into their launchers, delivered by valiant Ukrainians, as well as some of their key radar.
        1. urzul
          urzul 31 October 2012 11: 46
          +12
          well, as they say they put rockets into their launchers,
          The radar station, after which the air defense of Georgia’s air defense personnel fell below the baseboard.
          1. omsbon
            omsbon 31 October 2012 13: 31
            +8
            Quote: urzul
            Georgia’s air defense fighters lost their morale below the baseboard.

            In general, like Lermontov’s
            ... the battle did not last long,
            timid Georgians fled.
            1. ikrut
              ikrut 1 November 2012 02: 57
              +1
              The aphorism "Georgian warrior" has added to the collection of the shortest jokes like "the bun hanged himself" or "the negro is sunbathing"
          2. silver_roman
            silver_roman 31 October 2012 14: 10
            +7
            Yusch put his godmother Mishka Sahak buk-m1, which successfully shot down a couple of our aircraft, and the su-34 interfered with the radar-ki and then safely dunked it! this is to add specificity to the posts above))

            34 was alone!
        2. 1946095andrey
          1946095andrey 31 October 2012 12: 12
          +5
          Quote: Wedmak
          posed by valiant Ukrainians

          I don’t understand there, there were Ukrainian BMPs, but maybe our soldiers fought there, as they say, we are NAKLEP) !!!!
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 20
            +1
            The fact that the air defense systems were Ukrainian seems to be proven. Although you are right, in fact, there are more questions about this war than answers.
          2. urzul
            urzul 31 October 2012 12: 20
            +2
            Ukraine does not deny supplies of BUKs, were deducted from combat duty
        3. dchanc112
          dchanc112 31 October 2012 14: 18
          -11
          You need to smoke grass in small doses, especially for specialists in electronic warfare and electronic warfare from the Gl.operative department.
      2. Igor
        Igor 31 October 2012 12: 03
        -5
        Quote: RETX
        Air Force peru 200 aircraft? with whom should they fight?


        I’m not saying that they will have to fight with someone, but for defense it is necessary to have at least 200 fighters.

        Quote: RETX
        Everyone perfectly saw what they did 2 Su 34 in Georgia


        At that time there was only 1 Su-34. And where did 5 attack aircraft and 1 bomber go?

        Quote: RETX
        that 3 T50s can do severe troubles to any opponent.


        If the enemy does not have air defense, then the maize can do a lot of trouble.

        Quote: Wedmak
        There was one Su-34 in Georgia. He crushed Georgia’s electronic warfare systems, and as they say he put rockets into their launchers


        If he destroyed at least one launcher, then he was praised, the special forces seized the rest of the installations and they were abandoned, then after the war these installations were shown as trophies.
        1. Retx
          Retx 31 October 2012 12: 22
          +4
          Well, they don’t need so many planes, damn it. Budget then calculate how much Peru will fly 200 new aircraft.
          It was 2 Su 34, tail numbers 01 and 46. They were engaged in electronic warfare. The attack aircraft had a different task, according to their profile.
          Air defense air, that's about corn in vain smile , one flew to us in Moscow ...
          1. Igor
            Igor 31 October 2012 12: 55
            -3
            Quote: RETX
            Well, they don’t need so many planes, damn it.


            Yes, there is not written at all how much they need, the article was written by a journalist, and not by the commander in chief of the Peruvian Air Force laughing

            Quote: RETX
            Budget then calculate how much Peru will fly 200 new aircraft.


            Well then, for the protection of the air border, 3 Su-30s will be enough for them, and such prodigies like T-50 are needed for attack, and not for defense. The Egyptians at the time of the MiG-25 so they managed to ... fuck it.

            Quote: RETX
            The attack aircraft had a different task, according to their profile.


            And the Tu-22 had another task, but where were the Su-27,34, etc. why weren’t they protecting the air defense from the fire?

            Quote: RETX
            here about the corn-grower in vain smile, one flew to Moscow to us ...


            So he recently flew to Minsk, bombed by bears and flew back.
            1. Wedmak
              Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 57
              +1
              And the Tu-22 had another task, but where were the Su-27,34, etc. why weren’t they protecting the air defense from the fire?

              Cover the scout ????
              1. Igor
                Igor 31 October 2012 13: 24
                -3
                Quote: Wedmak
                Cover the scout ????


                If he flies over the battlefield and has reached him near-range air defense, then yes, it was necessary to cover.
                1. urzul
                  urzul 31 October 2012 13: 39
                  +3
                  Amendment, TU-22 was shot down by a medium-range BUK-1M system
            2. Retx
              Retx 31 October 2012 13: 05
              +5
              Wunderwaffles Raise ChSV laughing and actually the psychological factor, how much the world is scared of with stealth, remember? It is possible that they will buy the Indian-Russian PAK for export which, but now they have enough 10 Dryers for their eyes, and they are MiG operators, so the actual choice will be obvious smile
              That's who I see as a clear buyer of export PAKs, this is Iran (amendment, if they survive)
              1. silver_roman
                silver_roman 31 October 2012 14: 18
                +1
                so many sanctions have been imposed on Iran that they will soon be banned from importing sneakers. it is unlikely that our western "partners" will allow the supply of T-50 to Iran.
          2. sir.jonn
            sir.jonn 31 October 2012 13: 05
            0
            Come on, if one potential customer is added, it will not be worse. The main thing is that this does not turn out to be an American paw stretched out from around the corner, or even a lover of other people's secrets.
        2. silver_roman
          silver_roman 31 October 2012 14: 16
          +1
          for the defense capabilities of a country such as Peru, with an area of ​​1 km², 285 landings will probably be too much. I think 216 pieces would be enough for them to cover the entire airspace of the country. and buy a pair of LA radar detection type A-200 or AWACS and you can feel comfortable.
        3. sasha127
          sasha127 31 October 2012 14: 38
          0
          Yes, damn it. Not a weak desire!
      3. Volozhanin
        Volozhanin 31 October 2012 15: 15
        0
        And what did the 34 couple do in Georgia? It is widely known only about one aircraft and one jammed radar, it seems, in Gori, and then the data on this are contradictory, nothing more is known. T-50, candy plane? his real performance characteristics, as well as those of the Raptor? how can we even say that our cooler if they didn’t even meet in the training battle, especially since we only have prototypes, read raw, but I don’t argue with the handsome man. And yet, except from the car Depends, it seems unmanned so far.? There are generally a lot of cheers and patriots, as teenagers, by golly. But the situevina is completely unclear and I won’t be surprised that it is worse than it actually is, let's dance from this
        1. dchanc112
          dchanc112 31 October 2012 15: 31
          -3
          What do you believe in any writings. What Su-34s in the 2008 conflict were used. Right kids!
        2. sir.jonn
          sir.jonn 31 October 2012 17: 48
          0
          Yes, the real performance characteristics are not known not at f22 and not at t50, but all that is known is most likely a deliberate exaggeration to maintain faith in the power of one's own forces. Real confrontation in battle will give an accurate assessment of their abilities and God forbid us to ever see it with your own eyes.
    2. crazyrom
      crazyrom 31 October 2012 18: 36
      0
      Quote: Igorek
      at least 200 pieces are needed for state defense

      200 is impossible in any way, if you put 200 dryers in Peru, there will be no place for people, the country is small, this is not Russia for you laughing
  3. jagdpanzer
    jagdpanzer 31 October 2012 11: 31
    +1
    Burkina Faso definitely needs))) something is running ahead of the engine guys
  4. Wedmak
    Wedmak 31 October 2012 11: 36
    +1
    Eka guys bent! He needs it right ... and even THREE things! smile This, let me guess, is the Peruvian Air Force budget? Nefig! First to our Air Force, then to everyone else ... They rolled their lips already ...
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 31 October 2012 12: 27
      +4
      Quote: Wedmak
      Eka guys bent! Straight needs

      So I agree with the proposal, to draw on the An-2 "Corn" large, so that it could be seen from the ground: PAK FA T-50, or it is possible: T-55 and sell five pieces of Perum at a discount for some of their holiday, even the kids are happy, well, it’s obvious, after all, the peasants really need it.


      After meeting in September with President Putin of the republic of Peru, Ollanta Umaly, I saw a roof-cover from impressions, but Chavez was not there, he quickly broke his horns, he was the first in line for Su-34s.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 40
        +2
        No, this is not right. Though they are distant "partners", let them buy MiGs! For their terrain just right (half of the country is mountains, the area is less than 1.5 million km), where do they need heavy fighters? 50 pieces (including stock and current repair) are enough for the eyes!
        1. Sergh
          Sergh 31 October 2012 16: 01
          +1
          Quote: Wedmak
          area less than 1.5 million km

          I also recently looked at the map of Peru, tears came to my senses, that they were there, poppy overeating or what they have growing, narcotic corn? They have a beach in the length of the whole country, and give them bonbs, it’s better to buy sailboats and great water, and build hotels. Also damn it, warriors, spit from the plane, for three days, divers will look for this Peru.
        2. CRONOS
          CRONOS 31 October 2012 22: 39
          +1
          And what kind of cones will they buy these supposedly supposed T-50s? Or do you say credit again? fool They are for past loans that are not yet calculated soon.
  5. sasha.28blaga
    sasha.28blaga 31 October 2012 11: 41
    0
    Let them show off, three planes are neither here or there on one side, but on the other, the territory of Peru is only enough for three planes to fly, and if there are more, then an accident on the road cannot be avoided.
    1. silver_roman
      silver_roman 31 October 2012 14: 21
      0
      Well, I would not say that Peru is so small. Russia is 16 times larger in area, but Russia ... is not ... RUSSIA is a MILITARY COUNTRY.
  6. Windbreak
    Windbreak 31 October 2012 11: 41
    +7
    see the Chinese through Peru want to get PA-FA
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 31 October 2012 11: 44
      +1
      Or the Americans. They are closer to me.
    2. sea
      sea 31 October 2012 15: 25
      +3
      sense then? they still can’t drive in like our deck aviation has wings folding, and you say pak-fa.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 31 October 2012 16: 53
        +1
        I think HOW they add up, I suppose they cannot repeat the strength characteristics of the folding wing.
  7. Robin_3ON
    Robin_3ON 31 October 2012 11: 59
    +2
    The 5th generation lip-rolling machine by him, not PAK FA ... fool ., first you need to do yourself !!!
  8. dimon-media
    dimon-media 31 October 2012 12: 27
    +1
    It is necessary, then it is necessary. everything is in order. First for myself, then superfluous for everyone in order who wants to acquire. Everyone except Xeraxes. Although .. figs they will be able to copy. Not that level.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 37
      +2
      Xeroxes, as you called them, are already sawing their own. What they get there, no one really knows. It seems like it even flies ... However, on our engines any garbage with wings will fly up.
      1. Sergh
        Sergh 31 October 2012 12: 44
        +2
        Quote: Wedmak
        on our engines any garbage with wings will take off.

        Sorry, I’ll correct it, perhaps without wings too ..., even if you stick to the school bus, it will fly to neighboring Bolivia, only seat belts are required.
        1. Wedmak
          Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 47
          +1
          Well, in general, I agree. Wings, however, the direction is easier to keep. smile
      2. silver_roman
        silver_roman 31 October 2012 14: 23
        0
        like they even have 2 types of glider .... their 5th generation will be similar to the 5th generation only with the name of the generation)))). it’s too early for them to do such shnyagi ....
  9. Kolyan 2
    Kolyan 2 31 October 2012 12: 38
    +2
    1946095andrey (1) Today, 12:12 ↑ ↓ new 1
    Quote: Wedmak
    posed by valiant Ukrainians

    I don’t understand there, there were Ukrainian BMPs, but maybe our soldiers fought there, as they say, we are NAKLEP) !!!!

    Sorry bro, but your nationalists or yosh who were there. I didn’t get there and my friends went, the sea brought evidence, their description will not be correct
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 31 October 2012 13: 44
      +4
      Quote: Kolyan 2
      posed by valiant Ukrainians

      Well, what will I say, see for yourself, specially found an old selection.

  10. Wedmak
    Wedmak 31 October 2012 12: 46
    +1
    By the way, I thought this way: would it not be with the arrival of PAK FA (and PAK YES at the same time) in the Air Force, the same story as heavy, medium and light tanks? There will be no heavy and light fighter, but there will be primary? And so on - the main attack aircraft, the main bomber, the main strategist ...
  11. Romeohihnic
    Romeohihnic 31 October 2012 13: 29
    +1
    We would have more such aircraft
    1. urzul
      urzul 31 October 2012 13: 42
      +1
      By the way, all the gray elements on the glider are made of composites.
  12. nordcapital
    nordcapital 31 October 2012 13: 59
    +1
    Colombia's Ministry of Defense reported that they need 1.73 Pak Fa fighters for effective defense
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 31 October 2012 16: 07
      +1
      Quote: nordcapital
      Colombia reported that they need 1.73 Pak Fa fighters for effective defense

      In-in, in the city with glasses, and if in the countryside, then PAK FA will fly better in bulk.
  13. 11 black
    11 black 31 October 2012 15: 03
    +1
    well, let's still PAK FA will sell small pieces in 3 lots - the Chinese will be happy ... if you want to buy, buy not 3 but 30 but better 130!
  14. CRONOS
    CRONOS 31 October 2012 15: 23
    +1
    Damn, we ourselves would first compel them to fly these planes, otherwise we rivet a teaspoon of 4 ++ generation at an o'clock per hour, and they are already licking their lips at the fifth. tongue
    I would very much like to read the opinion of Sergey VAF, what he thinks about the assistance of three planes, even in the conditions of the Peruvian Air Force ... On the site I registered only because of him and on those he left ...
    And why three? request I understand 4 - two pairs, the leader and the follower.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 31 October 2012 17: 05
      +1
      That's right. Three, slave, lead and spare. smile
      1. dchanc112
        dchanc112 31 October 2012 20: 02
        -1
        Who would doubt that! And a spare bag of potatoes to boot. You are not a waiter in the flight canteen. Or, - "I am a former squadron commander, let me finish your beer.
  15. Mr.Fox
    Mr.Fox 31 October 2012 17: 11
    +1
    Quote: RETX
    one flew to us in Moscow ...


    Suppressed the entire air defense system of the Soviet Union :)
    1. CRONOS
      CRONOS 31 October 2012 22: 46
      0
      I didn’t suppress it, but simply scored a big and fat one on it ... by the way, they saw him on radars, but considered him a liner.
  16. andrei332809
    andrei332809 31 October 2012 17: 34
    0
    we alone do not need ... as they say, a shoemaker without boots.
    but in general the news is wild. what does the minobr say there? Is everything equipped with us?
    1. MrBoris555
      MrBoris555 1 November 2012 13: 13
      0
      What kind of snot? Someone there wrote what they needed, so shouts at once "AAAAAAA, WE DO NOT NEED, OUR BAD", but nothing that PAK FA is being developed at the expense of the MO budget? and is it already talking about purchases upon completion of development?
  17. suharev-52
    suharev-52 31 October 2012 19: 46
    +1
    T-50 to sell early. It is necessary to provide for your needs. And even then I have doubts that we will have time. The world is rolling into the abyss. And it doesn’t matter who first presses the button. Just when assessing the current situation, the world has no other alternative. Only war. And she's not far off. And the fact that she accidentally bypasses Russia by the side - I do not believe. Not a single serious conflict has passed us for a thousand years. So get ready men. Sincerely.
  18. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 31 October 2012 21: 39
    +1
    Here, normal men in Peru, realists: the country's area of ​​1 km² population 285ml. They want to buy 216 aircraft, adequately assessing their capabilities and expediency. (Remembering the previous article about the Netherlands with an area of ​​30 km3 and a population of 41500 ml, but the afflicted people should buy as much as 2 F-17) I think the Peruvians just need to give at least one Su80 to the evil Netherlands)))
    1. CRONOS
      CRONOS 31 October 2012 22: 48
      0
      Just the Dutch are more creditworthy. And comparing the central European country with the Latin American third world country is strong. laughing
  19. MrBoris555
    MrBoris555 1 November 2012 13: 09
    0
    break off let idiots dumb