Operation Torch. How the Allies took over French North Africa

27
Operation Torch. How the Allies took over French North Africa
American heavy cruiser "Augusta" under fire from the French battleship "Jean Bar" in the battle near Casablanca, during Operation Torch


Allied plans


The Anglo-American command sought to make full use of Germany's deteriorating position on the Russian front in order to defeat the enemy in North Africa and achieve dominance in the Mediterranean basin. Britain and the United States planned to establish complete control over North Africa, the colonies of Italy and France, strengthening their resource base and, accordingly, worsening the position of the Axis countries.



Also, North Africa with the surrounding areas was a strategic springboard for the future invasion of Italy and the countries of South-Eastern Europe. At the same time, it became possible to fully use the sea communications going from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean through the Suez Canal, which reduced time and material costs.

They also took into account the fact that the enemy could not divert large forces to this theater, connected with the war with the Russians. That is, the risks of getting a strong rebuff and incurring heavy losses were minimal. The Allies hoped that the French troops in North Africa, loyal to the Vichy regime, would not put up serious resistance.


First, the Allies planned to defeat Rommel's army in Egypt, then to invade Morocco and Algeria. During the operation "Torch" ("Torch"), it was supposed to seize bridgeheads in the areas of the cities of Oran, Algiers, Tunisia and Casablanca. Then establish control over all of French North Africa - Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. If necessary, they were going to occupy Spanish Morocco. The capture of the French colonies in Africa was supposed to lead to a weakening of the collaborationist regime in southern France and to strengthen the base of the French Resistance ("Fighting France"), led by de Gaulle.

At the same time, Britain and the United States were going to intensify the actions of their navies and air forces in the Mediterranean in order to achieve complete dominance here, create a favorable situation for troops in North Africa and prepare for future operations in southern Europe.

Thus, the United States and Britain adhered to the previous strategy of dragging out decisive action against the Axis countries while Germany concentrated all its efforts in the fight against Russia. At the same time, the Americans and the British tried to grab as many tidbits as possible for the future redistribution of the world in their favor.


"Torch"


British 8th Army victory in Egypt (How Montgomery's 8th Army stormed Rommel's positions at El Alamein) radically changed the strategic situation in North Africa in favor of the allies. Aviation and the fleet of the allies were able to use the airfields and ports of Libya.

The plan of the landing operation provided for the landing of large forces in the areas of the ports of North Africa. General Dwight Eisenhower was appointed to command the operation, having located his headquarters in Gibraltar. Andrew Cunningham was appointed naval commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force; his second-in-command, Vice Admiral Bertram Ramsey, was tasked with planning the landing.

There were up to 6 divisions in the first echelon. Several airborne battalions were intended to capture airfields and important points on the coast. As part of fleet, providing the transfer and landing of troops, there were up to 450 ships and vessels.

Three operational formations of the fleet were created: Western, Central and Eastern under the command of the American Admiral G. Hewitt, the British Commodore T. Troubridge and Admiral G. Barrow. The western formation of the fleet ensured the passage of troops from the United States and their landing in the Casablanca region (35 thousand Americans), the Central one - from Britain to the Oran region (39 thousand Americans) and the Eastern one - from the British Isles to the Algiers region (23 thousand British and 10 thousand Americans). The passage by sea and the landing were covered by the US and British navies.

For aviation support of the operation, two Air Force commands were created - Western (Casablanca and Oran) and Eastern (Algeria).

The Americans were able to establish contact with the commander of the Vichy forces in Algeria, General Charles Mast, and win over the army general of the Vichy regime, Henri Giraud. The French commanders promised not to oppose the landing. Therefore, the significant Vichy forces in North Africa - up to 200 thousand people, up to 500 aircraft and the Mediterranean Fleet (5 battleships, including one unfinished, 12 cruisers, about 40 destroyers, more than 20 submarines and other small ships), could not put up serious resistance to the allies .


Damaged French battleship "Jean Bar" at the pier, after the battle at Casablanca. The battleship accepted the battle with the ships of the American squadron, being unfinished. As a result of the damage received, the ship sat down on the ground astern. In the area of ​​​​the stern on the starboard side, traces of serious destruction are visible from a 454-kg bomb that hit a place previously damaged by a bomb and a 406-mm projectile


Damaged light French cruiser "Primoge" on the shallows of the port of Casablanca. On November 8, 1942, the Primoge, despite repairs being carried out on it, went to sea accompanied by five destroyers and entered into battle with the American formation. The clash turned out to be fleeting due to the overwhelming superiority of American forces. The cruiser was hit by shells from the American cruiser Brooklyn, as well as hit by aerial bombs from SBD Downless dive bombers operating from the Ranger aircraft carrier. As a result, the cruiser was heavily damaged and washed ashore, after which she burned all night. 45 crew members were killed, including the commander - Captain 1st Rank Mercier, more than 200 people were injured

Allied landings in North Africa


On October 24, 1942, the landing transports left the ports of America, a few days later - from the ports of the British Isles. There was no opposition from the air forces and fleets of Italy and Germany. The Allies managed to keep the time and place of the landing secret. The Italians informed the Germans that large naval forces were moving through Gibraltar into the Mediterranean and further east. The Germans decided that the enemy was preparing an amphibious landing in Libya, or in Sicily, Sardinia and southern Italy. The option of invading French North Africa was considered last.

On the night of November 8, 1942, the landing began. The landing force was ordered not to fire unless they were fired upon. At 10 o'clock in the morning, the address of the American President Roosevelt was broadcast on the radio. He promised not to seize French possessions and called for cooperation.

In Morocco, the Americans landed north and south of Casablanca. The main difficulties were associated with weather conditions and shortcomings in navigation support. The French fleet, air force and garrisons offered minimal resistance at first. The landing started late. At dawn, the French increased resistance: coastal batteries and ships opened fire, landing facilities and bridgeheads were attacked by ships and aircraft.

Allied naval artillery and aircraft from aircraft carriers responded. By the end of the day, more than 7,5 thousand people were landed on the shore. At the same time, the paratroopers captured two large airfields in Morocco. The French stopped resisting. Casablanca was surrounded and surrendered by 10 November.

The Americans landed in the area of ​​Oran to the west and east of the city. The French resisted. In particular, they repelled an attack by British ships and an attempt to capture Oran from the sea. Two patrol ships and most of the paratroopers on them were lost. The Allies lost over 600 killed, wounded and missing. However, on November 10, the Oran garrison capitulated.


US paratroopers in a landing craft en route to the Oran landings

Algeria was captured without enemy resistance. Here, on the night of November 8, the French Resistance forces attempted to carry out a coup and captured a number of important objects. While the Vichy fought them, the allies made a landing. Coastal batteries were previously disabled by the rebels. Already on the 8th, the Allies occupied Algiers. On November 10, landing transports were sent to capture the port of Buzhi, its garrison surrendered without a fight on the 11th.


Damaged French destroyer "Milan" on the shallows of the port of Casablanca. On November 8, 1942, the destroyer received numerous damage and washed ashore.


American soldiers rest on a pier after landing in the harbor of the port of Fedala in Morocco.

Agreement


In general, Vichy resistance was minimal. The French lost more than 3,3 thousand killed and wounded, the Allies - 3,6 thousand people. With the determined resistance of the French, the allies would have faced big problems and the losses were very serious.

On November 10, 1942, the commander-in-chief of the French forces, Admiral Francois Darlan and General Henri Giraud, negotiated with the Allies and ordered the French land, sea and air forces to cease resistance and strict neutrality. On November 22, an agreement was concluded with the French. The allied command received greater rights, but the administration remained French. Darlan became High Commissioner for North Africa, Giraud led the French troops who joined the Allies.

Anglo-American troops were able to safely land and march east. In mid-November 1942, having occupied Morocco and Algeria, the Allies entered the territory of Tunisia. By the beginning of December 1942, the Allies had already landed more than 250 thousand people.

The German command tried to preempt the enemy and seize a bridgehead in Tunisia. In accordance with the directive of November 10, the transfer of troops to Tunisia began by sea and air. From France and Italy were transferred tank and infantry divisions that formed Task Force Nering. In early December, this group was transformed into the 5th Panzer Army. The army received the task, together with Rommel's troops retreating from Libya, to keep Tunisia.

On November 17, the Nering group entered into battle with the Anglo-American troops west of Bizerte. In the second half of November, the allied troops reached the western part of Tunisia, on the distant approaches to the ports of Tunis and Bizerte. Further advance was stopped by the enemy. The allied command began to increase the grouping, by the end of January 1943 - more than 400 thousand plus up to 200 thousand French.

In response to the Allied invasion of French North Africa, German troops occupied Southern France. The French sailors scuttled their fleet so that the Germans would not get it. This finally changed the balance of the Navy in the Mediterranean in favor of the Allies.


A US Army Jeep "Willis" exits a landing craft in the harbor of Fedala, Morocco.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    17 November 2022 07: 34
    As for the resistance of the French in Africa, I have only one analogy: the resistance of a gang of deserters who do not want to go to the front. In general, it should be remembered that France is the largest and most important ally of Nazi Germany and the number of Frenchmen who fought in the Wehrmacht significantly exceeded the entire number of the so-called. resistance. But this is not the most important, much more important that the entire industry of France plowed like bobbins for the Reich. The most cursed aircraft of the war, the FV-189, the famous frame, was produced in France, and the Biscay Cross, and vehicles ....
    In general: "If the Allies land two divisions, I will meet them with fire, if twenty, with flowers" General Weygand.
    By the way, the peasants of Villa Bocajo did not bother to warn the British that they were waiting for them in the gardens, the Tigers of Misha Witman would not wait, but they could not help but know, not to see.
    In general, the French are a nation of traitors!
    1. +4
      17 November 2022 08: 34
      Operation "Torch" is probably the least covered episode of World War 2 in Russian literature, oddly enough, the first time I encountered this operation in the mid-90s in the scenario of the Civilization game. Thanks to the author for the article, but the outcome and consequences are not particularly described in detail. The details of the further fate of the French ships are interesting.
      1. +2
        18 November 2022 18: 52
        Quote: Civil
        Thanks to the author for the article, but the outcome and consequences are not particularly described in detail. The details of the further fate of the French ships are interesting.

        There is a translation into Russian of Morison's book Operations in North African Waters.
    2. +2
      17 November 2022 09: 39
      They are on the side of France, and they were not obliged to remain loyal to anyone else. It is not in their interests to destroy their country when the allies who have fled are holed up across the English Channel. So, it is not clear what kind of betrayal we can talk about.
      1. +1
        17 November 2022 10: 32
        That's their country and betrayed. Well, then there was no opportunity to take the third position. Did not have! Either for or against. France chose the Third Reich, and only the wisdom and courage of de Gaulle allowed the French to at least a little excuse themselves from complicity in crimes.
        And the British dumped across the river only after the complete collapse of the French army, and so they fought for them, as in fact in the Great War.
        And by the way, in general, can anyone remember that France would fulfill its allied obligations to anyone?
        1. Fat
          +3
          17 November 2022 14: 05
          Quote: Grossvater
          And by the way, in general, can anyone remember that France would fulfill its allied obligations to anyone?

          hi Of course, Alexei, something comes to mind. Do you remember under what article yesterday in the "history" section you left comments smile Okay, I'll give you a hint. The article was titled "Alone Against the Coalition of European Powers: Reasons for the Defeat of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War".
          1. +2
            17 November 2022 19: 30
            Yes Yes. Perhaps I formulated my question incorrectly. Sorry. It would be more correct to ask whether it happened that France really came out in defense of her allies.
      2. +2
        17 November 2022 11: 10
        Quote: Prokop_Svinin
        It is not in their interests to destroy their country when the allies who have fled are holed up across the English Channel.

        Do not forget that the French and the British have a long and rich history of relationships. It is even difficult to say who the Franks do not like more - boches or limes? smile
        And, taking into account the same operations "Catapult", "Exporter" and "Ironclad", you can understand the French.
        1. +3
          17 November 2022 19: 32
          So yes! They built their own French and fleet with a very big eye on England.
          1. 0
            17 November 2022 22: 06
            Well, yes, after Versailles, the Germans practically did not have a fleet. request
            1. 0
              18 November 2022 18: 54
              Quote: Sea Cat
              Well, yes, after Versailles, the Germans practically did not have a fleet. request
              But the Italians had ... :)
              1. 0
                18 November 2022 18: 57
                Well, the Italians are still "naval commanders" ... Although the unit of Prince Valerio was surprising, and there were separate ship commanders, but they all did not make the Fleet.
                1. 0
                  18 November 2022 19: 37
                  Quote: Sea Cat
                  Well, the Italians are "naval commanders" yet ...

                  Well... This became clear only after almost 20 years. :)
                  1. +1
                    18 November 2022 20: 44
                    They did not shine in the First World War, and even at first the Second and even more so ... smile
          2. 0
            18 November 2022 18: 55
            Quote: Grossvater
            They built their own French and fleet with a very big eye on England.

            And what was the "looking back", if not a secret?
      3. 0
        4 January 2023 09: 05
        Yeah, they are not traitors, they are prudent! Like, a nation of easy virtue.
  2. 0
    17 November 2022 10: 45
    For me, the French resistance in Africa is explained very simply - let's imagine that same North Africa:
    Favorable climate;
    A bunch of zhrachki for every taste;
    Various swill;
    Women of all colors of the rainbow;
    The power is completely in the hands of the warriors.
    Lepote!
    Here the same Englishmen are declared and demand to destroy the paradise existence for the sake of some kind of common victory. For the liberation of France.
    From whom?
    What for?!
    And under the Germans life is quite good? There is work, they are not yet called up for war, there are enough volunteers. By the way, they lasted until May XNUMX, the Charlemagne division, which defended Berlin together with the Norwegians, Danes and Dutch from Nordland.
    No, Hitler's EU was really united around Germany and Frenchies, by the way, were far from the latest ones, only when it smelled completely fried.
  3. +8
    17 November 2022 10: 57
    Thus, the United States and Britain adhered to the previous strategy of dragging out decisive action against the Axis countries while Germany concentrated all its efforts in the fight against Russia. At the same time, the Americans and the British tried to grab as many tidbits as possible for the future redistribution of the world in their favor.

    The general principles of the strategy for a future war were adopted by the Allies as early as February 1941. When the USSR and the Reich not only did not fight, but actively traded. And the main of these principles, on which all plans were based, were: the main theater of operations - Europe, the main task of the first stage - to knock out the weakest link of the Axis - Italy.
    So "Torch" is just the beginning of the implementation of the first stage of the strategic plan for the war with the Axis with the forces available to the Allies.
  4. +5
    17 November 2022 13: 42
    The Samsonov conglomerate has an amazing ability - it can ruin any topic that it undertakes to cover, distorting the course of historical events beyond recognition. Such a purgomet at the modern information dump, which is the Runet, still needs to be looked for.
    1. Fat
      +3
      17 November 2022 16: 21
      hi Greetings. You flatter the Runet, it's nice ... smile And, no, in general, a gigantic garbage dump, impossibly filthy, in comparison with which the Runet is just an unauthorized dump at a summer cottage. The global data volume in 2020 was 59 zettabytes. A zettabyte is 10 to the power of 21 bytes. To record all the data stored on the Internet for 2020, 60 billion terabyte disks were needed. The volume of information in the network according to "moderate estimates" is doubling every year and a half.
      Estimate the scale fellow
  5. Alf
    +4
    17 November 2022 18: 41
    while Germany is concentrating all its efforts in the fight against Russia.

    Or maybe from the USSR?
    1. 0
      18 November 2022 10: 02
      This is Samsonov. Him Soviet appear only when it comes to Civil.
  6. +5
    18 November 2022 08: 58
    )))
    make full use of Germany's deteriorating position on the Russian front
    ...
    At the same time, the Americans and the British tried to grab as many tidbits as possible for the future redistribution of the world in their favor.


    I have a couple of questions.
    1. It’s clear about the Russian WWII Front, this is Samsonov. But what were the deteriorations in the fall of 42? Unsuccessful battles for Nalchik?
    2. What other pieces did the damned Anglo-Saxons "try to capture"? The French colonies remained French, no one was going to squeeze them out.
    1. +1
      18 November 2022 10: 12
      Quote: Negro
      But what were the deteriorations in the fall of 42? Unsuccessful battles for Nalchik?

      of course, this is Samsonov © smile
      I wonder what will happen here in the comments if one of the Western authors writes that the Russian command sought to make the most of the deteriorating position of Germany on the African front in order to defeat the enemy near Stalingrad and Moscow? wink It seems to me that the tight bulges will even block the well-known topic with the Kursk Bulge and the landing in Italy.
      Quote: Negro
      2. What other pieces did the damned Anglo-Saxons "try to capture"?

      If the damned Anglo-Saxons had captured Algeria, then the Franks would have remained grateful to them in the end. laughing
      1. +1
        18 November 2022 11: 34
        Quote: Alexey RA
        did the Russian command seek to make the most of the worsening position of Germany on the African front in order to defeat the enemy near Stalingrad and Moscow?

        Here it would be necessary to start with the Belarusian operation.
        Quote: Alexey RA
        It seems to me that the tight bulges will even block the well-known topic with the Kursk Bulge and the landing in Italy.

        But they will not block the good moment that developed on the German-Polish front in September 39th.
        Quote: Alexey RA
        the Franks in the end would still be grateful to them.

        Let me remind you that for another 20 years Algeria was sacred to such an extent that after regrouping to more advantageous positions, patriots with a sledgehammer came to the father of the nation.
        1. +1
          18 November 2022 15: 33
          Quote: Negro
          Let me remind you that for another 20 years Algeria was sacred to such an extent that after regrouping to more advantageous positions, patriots with a sledgehammer came to the father of the nation.

          It's true. But globally, France would have won - by exchanging fulfillment of international duty restoration of constitutional order, terrorist attacks and practically a civil war in the Metropolis over Algeria for the next entry in the Great Book of Grievances. wink Maybe two hundred years from now, historians would have admitted that and it worked out so well.
  7. 0
    23 November 2022 15: 49
    Quote: Civil
    Oddly enough, I first encountered this operation in the mid-90s in the Civilization game scenario. .


    You probably mean the game Panzer General, in Civilization the plots were somewhat different. By the way, I'm also in the mid-90s and it's in PG :)