The United States will give Ukraine the AN-TWQ-1 Avenger air defense system

26
The United States will give Ukraine the AN-TWQ-1 Avenger air defense system
SAM Avenger one of the units of the US Army


The United States continues to help the Kyiv regime with the supply of weapons and equipment. The other day, they announced the preparation of another package of such assistance, which will include two types of anti-aircraft systems. For the first time, it is proposed to send AN / TWQ-1 or Avenger self-propelled short-range anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine. At the same time, the announced volumes of delivery and the known characteristics of such an air defense system already make it possible to consider such assistance practically useless.



In a new package


On November 10, the Pentagon announced the allocation of another military aid package. This time, it is proposed to send military equipment worth $400 million to Ukraine. weapons and artillery, missiles, vehicles, equipment and other property. As before, deliveries will be made from stock, from warehouses and from units of the US Army.

A special place in the new package is occupied by air defense systems. It is proposed to transfer to Ukraine a certain number of obsolete MIM-23 Hawk air defense systems, as well as four self-propelled short-range air defense systems AN / TWQ-1 Avenger. The latter will be provided with an unnamed number of FIM-92 Stinger guided missiles.

The exact delivery time of the air defense system is not given. Probably, well-established logistics routes will be used, and the equipment will enter the territory of Ukraine in the coming weeks. Apparently, measures have already been taken in terms of preparing calculations, and the complexes will be able to enter service as quickly as possible.

The supply of used air defense systems of two types is considered by the American side not only as another episode of military assistance. Earlier it was reported that the United States and NATO plan to restore the Ukrainian air defense and recreate a full-scale layered network of radar and air defense systems. Accordingly, the Hawk and Avenger complexes from the next aid package may become one of the first elements of the new air defense system.


Operator's cab, front view

However, the effectiveness of such measures - as well as the entire plan for the construction of Ukrainian air defense - is in question. The negative factors that are well known from other episodes of foreign military-technical assistance are reappearing. Whether foreign partners will take any steps to overcome these factors is unknown.

Decades in service


Like many other types of weapons and equipment transferred to Ukraine, the Avenger air defense system is a fairly old development. It was created in the early eighties by Boeing, and on its own initiative. The aim of the project was to create a modern anti-aircraft system for the ground forces or marines, armed with modern missiles and machine guns.

Thanks to the use of ready-made components, the development of the project took only 10 months, and in the spring of 1984, the Avenger experimental complex went to the test. Fine-tuning and adaptation of the air defense system to the army platforms took several more years. As a result of these events in 1987, the Pentagon placed the first order for serial complexes. By the beginning of the nineties, air defense systems on the HMMWV chassis began to enter combat units and replace outdated anti-aircraft self-propelled guns with guns. The complex was designated AN / TWQ-1, and the Humvee-based combat vehicle was named M1097.

Until the end of the nineties, the US armed forces acquired more than 1 thousand Avenger air defense systems. In addition, such equipment was supplied to some foreign countries. The total output of complexes exceeded 1100 units. In parallel with the production, the process of improving the complex was going on. Experiments were carried out with the replacement of missiles, control equipment, etc.

By the end of the 450s, the Pentagon changed the plans for the development of the army and the ILC, and the Avengers received a limited role in them. Subsequently, the marines completely abandoned such equipment, and the fleet of ground forces was reduced to XNUMX complexes. The released cars were sold abroad or put into long-term storage.


Arms maintenance

Now Ukraine will add to the list of AN / TWQ-1 operators. Probably, the air defense system for her will be taken from storage. After reopening and a simple restoration, four cars will be transported across the ocean. Whether there will be new similar deliveries has not yet been reported.

From ready-made components


AN / TWQ-1 / M1097 / Avenger is a light self-propelled anti-aircraft system with missiles and machine guns, designed for use in military air defense. He must fight tactical and army aviation the enemy, some means of destruction and other targets within a radius of several kilometers.

The rapid development of air defense systems was facilitated by the use of off-the-shelf components. Thus, the HMMWV off-road vehicle was chosen as the base for the complex, which provided the required level of driving performance. A modification of the vehicle with a rear cargo area was used, on which a new combat module was installed.

The module is an operator's cabin, freely rotating around a vertical axis. On the sides of the module are placed two rocking missile launchers, as well as separate casings with an optical-electronic station and a machine gun. Depending on the modification of the air defense system, the configuration of weapons could change.

The bulk of the air defense system received two launchers with four Stinger missiles on each. The FIM-92 missiles were borrowed from the portable air defense system of the same name, designed for infantry. This is a single-stage solid-propellant rocket with an infrared homing head; product length approx. 1,5 m, weight - 10,1 kg. The flight speed reaches 745 m / s, the range is 4,5 km with a target height of up to 3,8 km. The missile is equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 3 kg.


Start of a rocket

The missiles are supplemented by a 12,7 mm M3 machine gun, a modification of the common M2HB. This version of the machine gun is distinguished by an increased rate of fire, 1200 rds / min. The machine gun is designed to hit targets that managed to break through the missile "echelon".

The operator's workplace received a fairly simple equipment. There is a remote control with pickup and launch controls. A screen is also provided for outputting a signal from the OLS. In this case, the gunner can monitor the airspace through a large windshield. There are devices for receiving target designation from the unit commander or from various locators. The STC communication and control system was also introduced, which improves the ability to work as part of the unit.

Depending on the modification, the crew of the complex consists of two or three people. The minimum crew is the driver in the cab of the vehicle and the gunner in the combat module. When using the STC system, a third crew member is required, whose workplace is in the cockpit.

Objective limitations


In fact, the goal of the AN / TWQ-1 Avenger project was to transfer Stinger missiles to a self-propelled platform using additional control devices. This made it possible to more fully realize the potential of the rocket, as well as to get some new features. At the time of its appearance, such a complex showed fairly high performance and had all the required capabilities.

The strengths of the Avenger include the use of a ready-made platform and weapons that simplify operation and maintenance. The self-propelled complex, unlike the portable one, is equipped with several missiles and a machine gun at once. In addition, he received more sophisticated control equipment, incl. with the ability to share data about goals.


Machine gun shooting

However, there are problems and objective limitations. First of all, this is a general moral obsolescence. Missiles FIM-92, despite all the upgrades, no longer have high technical and combat characteristics. They do not fully correspond to the current tasks on the battlefield. The defeat of modern aircraft, helicopters or UAVs is no longer guaranteed, and a potential enemy has the ability to attack the air defense system from outside the zone of its destruction.

Thus, foreign air defense systems will not give Ukrainian formations any new opportunities. They already have a large number of portable "Stingers", but any effect from such weapons is not observed. It is unlikely that the use of such missiles from a self-propelled platform will change the situation. The AN / TWQ-1 air defense system has more advanced fire control devices, but in the absence of a full-fledged American-style air defense system, their potential cannot be used.

It is also necessary to note the insufficient volumes of supplies. Only four combat vehicles are simply not enough to make up for losses or to strengthen defense. To solve such problems, many times more equipment is needed, but the United States has not yet announced plans to continue deliveries of Avenger systems. In addition, it should be borne in mind that incoming equipment will be gradually destroyed. It is doubtful that the number of air defense systems will generally be able to increase to the desired level.

useless help


Ukrainian troops and infrastructure are under constant air strikes, and therefore the Kyiv regime urgently needs various anti-aircraft weapons. The United States is ready to provide air defense systems and allocate two types of equipment for this at once - Hawk and Avenger. However, once again we are talking about a limited number of legacy systems.

It is obvious that such supplies will have little effect on the combat effectiveness of Ukrainian air defense and will not create noticeable problems for Russian aviation, missiles or UAVs. At the same time, there are no prerequisites for changing this situation. The Kyiv regime has already lost most of its anti-aircraft weapons, incl. military air defense systems. Under such conditions, four Avengers are practically useless, and one cannot count on large quantities of equipment.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    15 November 2022 07: 29
    useless help

    So write the Author that all the help to the thieves from the LGBT West is useless, everything is old and rusty and does not work. Truth?
  2. +5
    15 November 2022 07: 52
    and it is not necessary to count on large quantities of equipment.
    Why? I remember they said something similar about the notorious Javelins. And now they've lost count.
    And 4 installations, this is 4, not 0. And the 32nd missiles with IR seeker in one charge are quite a serious threat.
    By the way, Stingers can also work on ground targets.
  3. +8
    15 November 2022 07: 54
    Too little, too late, useless.

    Now the basis of the short-range air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is the Strela-10 complexes. Avenger is their more advanced functional counterpart. It is available in hundreds of vehicles, cheap from the point of view of the United States (since it was produced a long time ago), uses a massive rocket and the Hammer base already known to Ukrainians. The obvious solution.

    Hawk. The main advantage is that there are many. This is a Cold War system, but at the same time, it is still in service with individual countries, incl. NATO members, which means that its components and ammunition are still being produced. Second, but no less important, in Greece and Turkey, Hoki were integrated with NASAMS (in the case of Greece, also with Patriot).

    Yes, now both those and other complexes have been delivered, so to speak, in a test batch. Whether there will be mass deliveries - time will tell. However, individual enthusiasts from the Russian side, who are waiting for the Soviet complexes to fall apart from day to day, the missiles for them to run out and it will be possible to bomb with cast iron, have been told clearly: do not wait.
  4. +15
    15 November 2022 08: 53
    The Kyiv regime has already lost most of its anti-aircraft weapons, incl. military air defense systems. Under such conditions, four Avengers are practically useless, and one cannot count on large quantities of equipment.

    Does anyone really believe in this nonsense?
    1. +11
      15 November 2022 09: 06
      Quote: Tucan
      The Kyiv regime has already lost most of its anti-aircraft weapons, incl. military air defense systems. Under such conditions, four Avengers are practically useless, and one cannot count on large quantities of equipment.

      Does anyone really believe in this nonsense?

      The first who believe is the author and the editors who let this series of "useless weapons" go to print, then, apparently, the hosts of the First and RTR believe, well, then those who watch only them, so the audience of the fooled is huge.
      It is obvious that such supplies will have little effect on the combat effectiveness of Ukrainian air defense and will not create noticeable problems for Russian aviation, missiles or UAVs.

      Masterpiece
      1. +6
        15 November 2022 09: 39
        Quote: Gvardeetz77
        then, apparently, the hosts of the First and RTR believe,

        There has been some confusion lately. On the one hand, no one canceled the order to throw hats, but on the other hand, it is necessary to somehow explain the third leveling of the front, and even in the Kherson region of the Russian Federation, so that "we are at war with all of NATO," etc.
  5. -3
    15 November 2022 10: 57
    This thing is worth a look...
    There is a rational grain, but not enough ...
    "Gerani" can shoot down, if not with missiles, then there is a radar + optics machine gun ...
    1. +1
      16 November 2022 13: 24
      Quote from Unco.
      "Gerani" can shoot down, if not with missiles, then there is a radar + optics machine gun ...

      It seems that there are only optics and a thermal imager. At the expense of the radar, where does the infa come from? There is no such data.
  6. +8
    15 November 2022 11: 33
    Party Avengers on trial.
    Avenger is more effective than the calculation of MANPADS of Mykola and Taras on a Pickup truck with a Virazh-Tablet.

    As well as all types of weapons, they are transferred in a slightly feedback-type manner, further or building up or closing. The first is Himarsy, 777, M / L119 - for example. Secondly, these are Switchblades and Maxpro - which proved to be bad and they will no longer be supplied.

    Air defense is objectively enhanced, despite knocking out installations (especially Buki). However, there is a hidden reserve for Buki, no one knows where the Finnish Buki and about 200 missiles for them are now. Obviously, this reserve will be used if necessary, but already or still pending, this is a question.

    Not now:
    1 Egyptian Iris-T battery
    2 NASAM batteries with a three-platoon composition
    1 Spada-Aspid battery
    In early November, the UK was sending missiles for SAMs - probably a batch of Starstreaks from the factory for Stormers already delivered. Their problem is that very few missiles have been produced in general and can only be taken from the factory. Stocks were shot back in March-July, when Marlets and Starstreaks flashed literally once every three days.

    On the way under the Christmas tree:
    Another Egyptian battery Iris-T.
    6 two-platoon batteries Hawk-PIP3, which the Ukrainians will immediately upgrade to YerzatsHok21 using the already delivered Sentinel radars.
    Krotali-NG, the commander of the French aerospace forces (it is they who give their Krotali) has already said that the Ukrainians are being trained. The number is still unclear.
  7. +3
    15 November 2022 17: 07
    ...
    The main message of the article is that the Americans help, but give junk and scrap .... which does not meet modern requirements
    Damn, well, the author, well, the hack writer ...
    The Stinger performs its main task - we do not have air supremacy.
    Everything. Do not need anything else. Well, if you manage to knock down something - that's absolutely fine.
    The main thing is that ours cannot fly .. everything else is both puffy and inconsistent with modern requirements., everything is secondary.
  8. +3
    15 November 2022 19: 52
    useless help
    All articles by the author of this series could have this text and nothing else... winked
  9. -3
    15 November 2022 21: 51
    Hawk is generally mammoth guano, the same age as the S-75 during the Vietnam War. Still, 60+ for air defense systems is a very respectable age. Even in the 19th century, a couple of generations of weapons managed to change during this time.
    1. +3
      16 November 2022 00: 27
      Quote: Rakitin
      Still, 60+ for air defense systems is a very respectable age.

      Firstly, all air defense of Ukraine was built on the S-300 and Buk from the mid-70s. So not much of a difference.
      Secondly, the configuration currently being discussed is the PIP-3 with the relatively modern AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel radar. That is, the 90s and 2000s. If it's important for you to compare, then by the time of appearance it is an analogue of the Buk M2. Only by the time of appearance, by the possibilities, the conversation is separate.
      1. -2
        16 November 2022 00: 41
        PIP-3 is 1982-89. Not to say that it is very modern, in the USA it has been decommissioned for 15 years.
        1. +1
          16 November 2022 08: 28
          Quote: Rakitin
          1982-89 yyy

          If you start counting from the beginning of work, your S-300 will leave in the 67th year. So anyway, Hawk is a newer complex.
          Quote: Rakitin
          in the USA 15 years since it was withdrawn from service.

          Yes, the Patriot is much better, who would argue. But the Patriot will not be given yet.
          1. -1
            2 December 2022 10: 56
            Quote: Negro
            If you start counting from the beginning of work, your S-300 will leave in the 67th year. So anyway, Hawk is a newer complex.

            If S-300, count from the 67th year (S-300 never existed in hardware), then Hawk must be counted from the 52nd year. No Hawk will not turn out newer.
            1. 0
              2 December 2022 11: 19
              Quote: Comet
              If S-300, count from the 67th year (S-300 never existed in hardware), then Hawk must be counted from the 52nd year

              You didn't get the point. Ukraine has the S-300 of the first series. And the Spanish Hawks of the latest series. THESE S-300s are closer to the times of Vietnam than THESE Hoki ..
              1. 0
                3 December 2022 09: 03
                Quote: Negro
                You didn't get the point. Ukraine has the S-300 of the first series. And the Spanish Hawks of the latest series. THESE S-300s are closer to the times of Vietnam than THESE Hoki ..

                The S-300 family is very far from the air defense systems of the Vietnam era, and Hoki is just from those times. The fact that during modernization something old is replaced by something new does not change the "architecture" of the complex. For example, the guidance of Hawk's missiles and the aerodynamic design of Hawk's missiles remained the same from those times, while on Buka both the guidance and aerodynamic configuration of missiles are different.
                1. +2
                  3 December 2022 11: 05
                  Quote: Comet
                  For example, the guidance of Hawk's missiles and the aerodynamic design of Hawk's missiles remained the same from those times, while on Buka both the guidance and aerodynamic configuration of missiles are different.

                  For example, on Hawk, all electronics are solid-state and a radar with AFAR is connected. On the Ukrainian Buk there are Soviet lamps, which now you can only find in the garbage.
                  1. 0
                    4 December 2022 13: 34
                    Quote: Negro
                    For example, on Hawk, all electronics are solid-state and a radar with AFAR is connected.

                    And it doesn't fundamentally change anything. The "architecture" of air defense systems and missiles remained the same.
                    Quote: Negro
                    On the Ukrainian Buk there are Soviet lamps, which now you can only find in the garbage

                    There is no such vacuum electronics in the garbage heap and never has been.
                    1. 0
                      4 December 2022 14: 24
                      Quote: Comet
                      And it doesn't fundamentally change anything.

                      Seriously?

                      SAM by the way is new. Architecture in the sense of the trailer remained old? It is sad.
                      Quote: Comet
                      There is no such vacuum electronics in the trash

                      Well, it means that in general atas, even in the garbage he can no longer find such a Mr. Fight as you wish.
                      1. 0
                        4 December 2022 15: 04
                        Quote: Negro
                        Seriously?

                        SAM by the way is new.

                        The same. Guidance, aerodynamics and control scheme have not changed.

                        Quote: Negro
                        Architecture in the sense of the trailer remained old? It is sad.

                        Have you ever heard of "architecture"? It is sad.

                        Quote: Negro
                        Well, it means that in general atas, even in the garbage he can no longer find such a Mr. Fight as you wish.

                        Very simple. By Buk in Ukraine they mastered the production of such "lamps".
                        Z.Y. Negro, just curious, you got into an area in which you understand nothing. Why, what is your profession and task?
                      2. 0
                        4 December 2022 15: 11
                        Quote: Comet
                        Guidance, aerodynamics and control scheme have not changed.

                        But the engine, warhead and electronics have changed. But you can continue to talk about architecture, of course.
                        Quote: Comet
                        By Buk in Ukraine they mastered the production of such "lamps".

                        Well, you said you couldn't find it in the garbage heap.
                        Quote: Comet
                        You have entered an area in which you do not understand anything.

                        What can you do if the "professionals" who graze here (like you) are sculpting a hunchback.
                      3. -1
                        4 December 2022 15: 22
                        Quote: Negro
                        Quote: Comet
                        Guidance, aerodynamics and control scheme have not changed.

                        But the engine, warhead and electronics have changed.

                        And this is secondary. The guidance remained as it was - semi-active, the remote control remained as it was - single-mode, aerodynamics did not change - tailless.

                        Quote: Negro
                        But you can continue to talk about architecture, of course.

                        So it is she who defines the "generation" of the air defense system.

                        Quote: Negro
                        Quote: Comet
                        By Buk in Ukraine they mastered the production of such "lamps".

                        Well, you said you couldn't find it in the garbage heap.

                        So you think Ukraine is garbage?

                        Quote: Negro
                        Quote: Comet
                        You have entered an area in which you do not understand anything.
                        What can you do if the "professionals" who graze here (like you) are sculpting a hunchback.

                        Humpbacked you see due to the absolute absence of even minimal knowledge in the area under discussion.
                      4. 0
                        4 December 2022 15: 45
                        Quote: Comet
                        Guidance remained as it was - semi-active,

                        What guidance does the 9M38 have?
                        Quote: Comet
                        The remote control remained as it was - single-mode, aerodynamics did not change - tailless

                        Well, you know, you have to launch unfashionable rockets.
                        Quote: Comet
                        it is she who determines the "generation" of the air defense system.

                        "Generations" didn't interest me. In fact, we have an air defense system of the 60s, made on new technologies, and an air defense system of the 70s, made on the technologies of the 60s.
                        Quote: Comet
                        So you think Ukraine is garbage?

                        Of course. I am always for the truth.
                        Quote: Comet
                        due to the absolute lack of even minimal knowledge in the area under discussion.

                        Naturally, all kinds of people there with awesome knowledge will tell us why the Soviet complex of the 70s and 80s is modern, and the Norwegian complex of the 00s is not modern.
      2. 0
        2 December 2022 11: 01
        Quote: Negro
        Firstly, all air defense of Ukraine was built on the S-300 and Buk from the mid-70s. So not much of a difference.

        Hawk is the same age as Cuba. Beech is the next generation.
  10. The comment was deleted.