Tests of ICBM "Sarmat" on the eve of completion

36
Tests of ICBM "Sarmat" on the eve of completion
The first test launch of Sarmat, April 20, 2022


A promising strategic missile system with an intercontinental ballistic missile "Sarmat" is currently at the stage of flight design tests. A few months ago, the first test launch of this product took place, and the next one is expected in the coming weeks. In addition, in the foreseeable future, the missile system will be adopted by the Strategic Missile Forces and will take up combat duty.



Rockets at the range


Almost five years ago, at the end of December 2017, the first launch of the RS-28 Sarmat test product took place at the Plesetsk training ground. In the spring of next year, two more similar tests took place at the same site, during which they collected the necessary information for the further development of the project.

Preparation for flight design tests (LKI), for unknown reasons, was delayed. The long-awaited first launch took place on April 20, 2022, again at the Plesetsk test site. An experienced ICBM passed along a given trajectory and successfully sent a combat load to a conditional target (targets) at the Kamchatka Kura training ground.

In the future, it was repeatedly reported that the next test launch as part of the LCI would take place in the coming months, although its exact date remained unknown. For example, in mid-July, the leadership of Roskosmos announced the preparation of a new experimental rocket for testing. In addition, a curious photo was published with one of the new missiles in a transport and launch container under a cover.


Officials have reported and confirmed several times this year that the Sarmat will enter service before the end of the year. Soon after that, by the beginning of 2023, the first missile regiment armed with new systems will take up combat duty.

The current state of affairs with the testing of "Sarmat" on November 8 was revealed by the TASS agency. From its unnamed source close to the Ministry of Defense, it learned that the LCI could be continued until the end of this year. The second launch, like the first, will take place at the Plesetsk training ground, and the rocket will send inert warheads to Kamchatka.

The source says that the second launch is of great importance for the entire program. After evaluating its results, the Ministry of Defense may decide to deploy the first regiment of Sarmat complexes.

Another source told TASS about future deliveries of missile systems. According to the contract signed with the contractor at the end of 2020, the regimental kit "Sarmatov" will first go into service with the Strategic Missile Forces. The exact timing of the transfer of the complete set with all the required funds remain unknown.


Test program


Thus, the Ministry of Defense and industry represented by Roskosmos, GRC them. Makeev and related organizations continue to prepare for a new test launch as part of full-fledged flight design tests. According to the latest newswork is proceeding according to the previously established schedule. There are no reasons for negative forecasts.

However, the observed situation raises questions. To date, the Sarmat has flown only once, and a second launch will take place in the coming weeks. According to its results, a decision will be made on putting the complex into service. This means that the entire cycle of flight tests, design and government, will be limited to just two launches.

It should be recalled that the tests of other strategic missile systems for the Strategic Missile Forces and the Navy lasted longer, and more launches were carried out within their framework. Why the LCI program of the promising Sarmat looks different is unknown.

It is possible that the RS-28 project is distinguished by its technical excellence, and already at the stage of bench and preliminary tests of individual units, it showed its best side. In addition, modern design and simulation technologies could be used in its creation, and preliminary “tests” were carried out using computer models.


One way or another, the customer and contractor found an opportunity to shorten and speed up the flight design and, possibly, state tests of the new missile system. Due to a properly drawn up test program, after the second launch it will become clear whether the Sarmat is suitable for deployment and combat duty.

It is curious that the announced test launch program does not provide for a demonstration of the full potential of the new ICBM. Previously, it was repeatedly reported that the Sarmat has a global range and in this respect surpasses all other domestic and foreign missiles. However, such opportunities will not be shown during the LCT. Flights will be carried out on a "non-global" route from Plesetsk to Kura.

Obviously, the two starts in 2022 will not be the last. After being put into service, the new missile will regularly participate in the exercises of the Strategic Missile Forces. At the same time, the missile forces will be able to gain the necessary experience in operating and using such weapons. In addition, at this stage they can test and show fundamentally new capabilities of the complex in the context of range and flight routes.


In turn, the industry during such combat training events will again collect data on the operation of ground systems and units of the rocket itself. Perhaps this will allow us to identify previously overlooked shortcomings and correct them. In addition, it will be possible to find ways to further improve the complex as a whole.

New opportunities


RS-28 "Sarmat" is a heavy-class ICBM and is intended for deployment as part of ground-based missile systems of the Strategic Missile Forces. With its help, in the foreseeable future, the remaining R-36M Voevoda missiles, which are ending their service life, will be replaced. As reported, the missile division in Uzhur will be the first to receive new ICBMs. The next regimental kit will go to the division from Yasnoe. In the future, as new deliveries are made, the connections will be completely transferred to modern complexes.

"Sarmat" was built according to a three-stage scheme with a payload dilution stage. The total length of the product will exceed 35 m, weight - approx. 210 tons. All three stages of the rocket are equipped with liquid rocket engines. It is reported that the propulsion system is characterized by increased characteristics, due to which faster acceleration is provided and the active section of the trajectory is reduced.

The flight range is indicated as global. According to various data and estimates, this parameter may exceed 15-17 thousand km. Thanks to this, the rocket will be able to send warheads to targets almost anywhere in the world, incl. with flight along optimal trajectories, which makes it possible to bypass enemy missile defense position areas.


It is known that the RS-28 will carry a multiple reentry vehicle with individual targeting units. The number and power of warheads are unknown. Up to ten units are expected to be installed. In addition, the Sarmat will become the carrier of the latest Avangard hypersonic gliding warhead.

In general, "Sarmat" in all respects surpasses the well-deserved, but outdated missile "Voevoda". In addition, it is new and will be able to continue serving for the next few decades. A high unused resource and special characteristics will make the RS-28 missile an effective deterrent.

Finishing line


Due to the overall complexity, the development of the RS-28 Sarmat project took longer than originally reported. The full test cycle has also been delayed - several years have passed between the throwing and flight tests, and now a new test launch is expected. Based on its results, a decision will be made on adoption.

Thus, the Sarmat project is at the finish line. What exactly the plans of the Ministry of Defense and Roskosmos look like for the near future and when the new launches will take place is not yet known. However, these issues will be clarified in the very near future, and then the Strategic Missile Forces will receive a new tool for solving the tasks of strategic deterrence.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    14 November 2022 16: 16
    The main thing is that the contacts do not rot and the LCD displays do not leak ...
    1. KCA
      +3
      14 November 2022 16: 40
      Oh, how, why is there a LCD display in the ICBM? Are kamikaze ideas alive?
      1. +1
        14 November 2022 18: 30
        No. It's just that everything is still here, the same amazing people. (((
        1. 0
          15 November 2022 07: 27
          Voevoda how many times was extended? What were they pulling with Sarmat?
    2. -3
      14 November 2022 21: 00
      They won't rot or leak.
      Young man, you are so far from the practical implementation mechanism (Oh! What kind of cardboard with holes) doomsday that I would not be surprised if you confuse the city of Kuibyshev with Samara.
  2. -3
    14 November 2022 16: 19
    There is more politics than practice in "accelerated" trials. They wanted to scare the Americans - it didn’t work out. Apparently, either the Americans know that everything is not as rosy as my reports, or they are confident in the lack of determination of those responsible "to press the button when necessary."
    1. -3
      14 November 2022 17: 51
      These "accelerated" tests raise some questions.
      With the planned launch, there will be only two of them within the framework of the LCI. And right there in the article there are already loud speeches about the supply to the troops. How to understand it?
      The delay with the tests is understandable, there was infa that the military was not satisfied with the first launch and they requested other performance characteristics (for a different PN?). As far as can be understood from the scanty messages, something was being redone there for the second launch and finally redone. So what? If everything goes well - on the stream? In a series? After the first launch after the rework?
      The same R-36M2 made about 20 test launches as part of the LCI before it was put into service.
      Or is the author of the article just wishful thinking?
      1. -2
        14 November 2022 19: 01
        No need to write nonsense. Other performance characteristics? This is a new order, not a revision.
        And the fact that two launches are not enough is as clear as the fact that they will continue after the start of mass production. Mace example.
        1. -3
          14 November 2022 19: 24
          Do you even know what TTX is?
          I bring to your attention: "Tactical and technical characteristics - a set of qualitative and quantitative parameters of a product of military equipment or weapons, describing its properties."
          In other words, even a slight increase in the diameter of the GO for another PN is already a change in the geometric parameters of the stage, its properties, therefore, a certain change in performance characteristics.
          And I repeat once again: according to the information available in the public domain, the military was not satisfied with the conclusions that were made after the first launch. And they demanded a rework (of what exactly - we are not supposed to know, of course). This explains the long gap between the first and second, only now planned launch. Remodeling was required. Node, details, geometry of GO - it doesn't matter. Those. in fact, a change in some technical characteristics of the product.
          1. +2
            14 November 2022 23: 32
            The performance characteristics of the product are determined at the TT stage and the tests should just confirm their compliance. And if "alterations" were required, this means that the product does not meet the specified performance characteristics, and not vice versa.
            Of course, the military can change their requirements for performance characteristics, but these are separate agreements, separate terms and separate money. And they will never change the dimensions of the product, because they are determined by the parameters of the mine.
        2. +3
          14 November 2022 21: 43
          Mace tests continued after the product was put into service, since container defects did not ensure 100% reliability of the rocket exit from the launcher. But it was adopted because the main performance characteristics were met and there was a considerable administrative resource.
          1. +3
            14 November 2022 23: 48
            This is not the main thing. The main thing was that it was necessary to urgently increase the marine component, even if it was weaker than Sinev and poorly developed Mace. Because we have nothing else. It is the same with Sarmat, the Governor must be urgently replaced, and there is no choice.
          2. +2
            14 November 2022 23: 52
            By the way, our "partners" do not consider the absence of one or two missiles from the boat set a failure. True, they never risked a full salvo.
    2. 0
      1 January 2023 02: 31
      It's not about the rocket, everything is in order with it. We finalized the blocks to launch from it. The last test was with similar blocks. What else is interesting. Previously, the launch was reported as an achievement, but the last time it was launched and not particularly advertised. Although there was a picture of which pit the block dug at the place of the fall, it is impressive. I have not seen such people before. And this is without a warhead. The deviation was 10 meters from the target center point.
  3. 0
    14 November 2022 16: 20
    What is the use of these Sarmatians and Poseidons if there is no strength and means (or no desire) to defeat Ukraine with conventional weapons?
    The USSR was also packed to capacity with nuclear ICBMs, but this did not save from leaving Afghanistan and the subsequent collapse of the USSR ...
    No matter how it happens again, only with the Russian Federation ...
    1. +6
      15 November 2022 00: 08
      The whole crumb is just in the Sarmatians and Poseidons. If not them, then in addition to the unfortunate Ukraine, all of NATO would have physically fought with us.
  4. +5
    14 November 2022 16: 20
    This is very optimistic news!
    Now they would also explain how this will help us near Donetsk and Kherson ...
    At one time, we rejoiced at the "Daggers" ... But where are they? ...
    1. -2
      15 November 2022 03: 15
      Quote: fax66
      At one time, we rejoiced at the "Daggers" ... But where are they? ...

      They are in service, placed incl. in Kaliningrad and Belarus, and they have already been used more than once in Ukraine. And although the main purpose of the "Dagger" is to hit high-priority targets with a special warhead, they are also used with conventional warheads. Incl. and for naval targets (worked out in the Caspian).
      Quote: fax66
      Now they would also explain how this will help us near Donetsk and Kherson ...

      Will not allow NATO to openly intervene in the conflict. And fresh replenishment will soon arrive in the NWO zone, which will increase the size of the group by 2,5 times. And it will be a completely different war. Without the numerical superiority of the enemy.
    2. 0
      1 January 2023 02: 35
      They work and are quite successful. But they are not shooting at soldiers. Once they showed when they hit the former nuclear storage, where there were ammunition depots. And there, the concrete-steel ceiling withstood a nuclear strike. So here
      broke through the vault and blew up this ammunition.
  5. +7
    14 November 2022 16: 27
    And thanks to Ukraine for everything. Where else would we get dishwasher chips on them? wassat
  6. +2
    14 November 2022 16: 38
    After being put into service, the new missile will regularly participate in the exercises of the Strategic Missile Forces

    In the Strategic Missile Forces on combat duty, exercises are held every day, and not just one. "Sarmat" is no exception, the start button is still the same, the color has not changed.
  7. 0
    14 November 2022 16: 54
    The number of launches before acceptance into service is usually close to 10. Here, it is possible that tests of the carrier and combat equipment were separated, in order to reduce testing before acceptance into service. But, it is unlikely that 2 successful launches will be enough to complete the test program. Rather, the adoption of such a formidable missile this year is said to keep the states in psychological tension and have trump cards in the negotiation process.
    1. +1
      15 November 2022 03: 25
      Quote from: navycat777
      to keep the states in psychological tension and have trump cards in the negotiation process.

      And this too. But you need to understand that "Sarmat" is essentially the same R-36M2. All the same engines, the same dimension, and a slight increase in the payload was obtained through the use of a new electronic component base (some time relays were on them). All novelty in a new place of production and a new element base. BB is most likely the same as on the "Voevoda". There were 10 of them. + a set of heavy and light decoys, electronic warfare / electronic warfare equipment. Without a missile defense kit, Voevoda could carry up to 14 of these APs. "Sarmat may 15 .
      So the Sarmat's novelty coefficient is not so great and it was decided to reduce the number of flight tests. If the second launch goes well, they will be put into service, they will start putting it on the database, but the test launches will continue.
      It's just that "Voevoda" needs to be changed.
      1. +2
        15 November 2022 14: 15
        A fundamentally new rocket in which the R-36m2 was the basis for development with a serious complication - the overall dimensions of the rocket had to remain the same in order to use the existing shaft dimensions for such missiles. Significantly modernized engines were used, the power was increased in order to maximize the rapid acceleration of the rocket, the design of the first stage of the rocket was redesigned, and the design of the second stage of the rocket was redone. The technological part of the rocket was carried out from scratch, which also added additional complexity. It is worth noting that the throwing tests took place in the amount of three pieces, only after that they were accepted. Flight tests are much more demanding and require significantly more tests. Suffice it to say that in the case of a floating defect, a missile with 10 warheads of 750 kt each can crash on the territory of the country. So I'm betting on 4 successful trials. And time can be won due to the early preparation of the serial production of the rocket
      2. 0
        15 November 2022 22: 10
        And the governors should be allowed on the Dnieper bridges.
      3. -1
        17 November 2022 00: 57
        Quote: bayard
        "Sarmat" is essentially the same R-36M2. All the same engines, the same dimension, and a slight increase in payload was obtained through the use of a new electronic component base

        You're not right! On old engines (and at 210 tons, not 208 tons of product weight), it is impossible to reduce the ICBM OUT by 2 times. It is a fact. Despite the fact that the "rouge" (silo) remains the same.
        Somehow, however. AHA.
        1. +1
          17 November 2022 01: 52
          For quite a long time, when work on the Sarmat was just beginning, there was information that the engines on the Sarmat would be the same as those on the Voyevoda. Also surprised - how will the acceleration time be reduced? Due to what? But after thinking, I decided that the "Vrevoda" has a two-chamber engine at the 1st stage, and if it is necessary to halve the pulse time, it is enough to put another one of the same engine so that the 4th chambers work (there is enough space there in terms of dimensions and cross section) . That's the reduction in acceleration time. This could also take an additional 2 tons of starting weight. "Sarmat", after all, has not yet been shown from the "ass" ... if there are four cameras, then it means that it is so.
          And it is clear that production at a completely different enterprise, on a different radio component base, makes the differences very large. But if everything was really done on the old groundwork (and this is reasonable), then the product during testing will behave much more predictably than experiments from scratch, as Yuzhmash did in the 70s and 80s.
          Well, and most importantly (why the rush to put into service) - it's time to change the "Voivods", and in the light of the impending war, a new missile of this class is a very serious argument.
          1. 0
            17 November 2022 16: 40
            Quote: bayard
            "Vrevoda" has a two-chamber engine at the 1st stage, and if it is necessary to halve the pulse time, it is enough to install another of the same engine so that the 4th chambers work (there is enough space there in terms of dimensions and cross section)

            Colleague! Excellent arguments ... But, there is a photo of a flying product of the RS-20V Voyevoda ...
            the product has FOUR nozzles ... and not two, as you say ... Alas!
            Design features
            The R-36M is a two-stage rocket that uses sequential stage separation. The fuel and oxidizer tanks are separated by a combined intermediate bottom. Along the body there is an onboard cable network and pipelines of the pneumohydraulic system, which are closed by a casing. The 1st stage engine has 4 autonomous single-chamber rocket engines, which have a turbopump fuel supply in a closed circuit, they are hinged in the tail part of the stage on the frame. The deviation of the engines at the command of the control system allows you to control the flight of the rocket.
            The photo, unfortunately, is not molded - a large volume (more than 5,0 Mb) - the editor does not let through. Alas.
            I don’t think that anyone on the SARMAT will be able to stick EIGHT "nipple" !!!
            Sincerely.
  8. -5
    14 November 2022 16: 55
    Key to start, countdown, let's go....
  9. -4
    14 November 2022 17: 03
    Need for syas klmplex "daskyfymy".

    Cool comment.
    Spam.
    Flood.
    Or maybe the state will be born as a rocket?
  10. +1
    15 November 2022 01: 31
    Tests of ICBM "Sarmat" on the eve of completion

    Good luck, guys!
    All Russia (and not only) hopes for you.
    We believe you won't let us down.
  11. -1
    15 November 2022 09: 16
    According to Bankova, you need to test it, there is a bold goal ...
  12. +1
    15 November 2022 12: 09
    Good system. Too bad it's not allowed.
  13. 0
    20 November 2022 09: 47
    And why not test the ICBM "Sarmat" in Nature? For example, in Lviv! Nuclear BC is optional.
    All the same, after all, flight tests are being carried out.
  14. 0
    16 December 2022 14: 36
    Quote from: skeptick2
    These "accelerated" tests raise some questions.
    With the planned launch, there will be only two of them within the framework of the LCI. And right there in the article there are already loud speeches about the supply to the troops. How to understand it?
    The delay with the tests is understandable, there was infa that the military was not satisfied with the first launch and they requested other performance characteristics (for a different PN?). As far as can be understood from the scanty messages, something was being redone there for the second launch and finally redone. So what? If everything goes well - on the stream? In a series? After the first launch after the rework?
    The same R-36M2 made about 20 test launches as part of the LCI before it was put into service.
    Or is the author of the article just wishful thinking?


    There, in addition to flight tests, there are many more ground tests. They are carried out according to the development plan.
  15. 0
    1 February 2023 15: 52
    Why only shoot in Kamchatka. all crossings between dill and Europe should become a testing ground. And they tested and there are no more ways to supply weapons.