Joshua Stevens rifles

48
Joshua Stevens rifles
Advertisement for a Stevens single shot "drop bolt" rifle


“Moor, I have in my collection a magnificent,
light as a feather, battle-tested
Cossack Berdan rifle. Come.
In the evening, Mauritius was presented
really great, very light
and surprisingly short rifle.
Unfortunately, Igor has
there was not a single bullet."

Evgeny Permyak "Humpbacked Bear"

stories about weapons. An article about rifles by Annie Oakley aroused great interest among the VO readership, as a result of which many wished to learn more about the rifles of the Joshua Stevens company.



The topic of “lever rifles” was also interesting to readers. The material published about them did not satisfy their curiosity completely. They wanted to know what else there were rifles with a bolt operated by a lever, representing one piece with the trigger guard. Questions were asked about the most famous rifles of this type after the Winchester, Marlin, Savage, Bollard, etc. In a word, the answers to these questions could also be enough for a whole article, and a number of samples would remain all still unaffected.


Scheme of the device of the shutter of a single-shot small-caliber (caliber .22) "rifle for boys" ("Model 17"). Indeed, it is not without reason that it is called "falling". When the lever is retracted forward, the l-shaped shutter really seems to “fall” back and at the same time actuates the extractor with a spring-loaded rod. At the same time, the trigger is cocked. Simple and convenient

Therefore, it makes sense to continue the story of Stevens rifles and at the same time show her rifles with a lever-operated bolt. Fortunately, she had such, and they were produced by the thousands!


Receiver "guns for boys". Photo heritageauctions.com/size]

And yes, indeed, the Stevens company, which has acted under various names many times, has an interesting history. It was founded in 1864, that is, towards the end of the Civil War, by Joshua Stevens, who had previously been one of the founders of the Massachusetts Arms Company. His partners there were a couple of other mid-century gunsmiths that everyone has heard of - these are Horace Smith and Daniel Wesson.


Patent No. 761463 illustrating the lever mechanism used on Stevens "boys" rifles

It's hard to imagine now, but Massachusetts and Connecticut were once the heart of the American arms industry. Chicopee Falls is near Springfield, where the US government's Springfield Arsenal was located and where Smith & Wesson's corporate headquarters are today. The company was first called J. Stevens Arms and Tool Company - that is, it was emphasized that it produces weapons and tools.


Patent No. 939142 for a lever-operated ejector in a 1909 Stevens rifle

But in the end, the management refused the word tool (tool) in its trade name and entered the market with a single-shot pistol, and then the company switched to the production of repeating rifles and the like.

In 1890, Stevens Arms produced its first "Boy's Rifle", a single-shot rifle with a vertically moving lever-operated bolt chambered in .22 caliber (5,56 mm).

In 1916, the company was bought out by a newly created division of Westinghouse, a well-known electrical equipment company that had just won a contract to manufacture Mosin rifles for the Russian Imperial Army of Nicholas II.


"Model 70". View from the left. Photo icollector.com

This deal ended very badly: Nicholas ceased to be king within a year (and died within two), and those who took his place refused to fulfill the terms of the contract.

Eventually, with financial assistance from the US government, Westinghouse returned to its electrical business, pulled out of the arms business, and sold the Stevens plant to Savage Arms, perhaps the most unfortunate name in American industrial history. Nevertheless, with all the failures that befell her, this office still operates and sells products under the name "Stevens".


"Model 70". Right view. Photo icollector.com

A rifle with a pump-action reloading system developed by the company was called Visible Loading Repeater, later officially shortened to Visible Loader (literally - “visible loader”). The first sample was introduced in 1908, and it was eventually produced until 1934 (Model 70 or No. 70).


Scheme of the mechanism of the Stevens rifle "Model 70" from US patent No. 935314

Arranged rifle was quite simple. Under the barrel was an underbarrel magazine familiar to Americans with a pusher, which consisted of two tubes: an inner one with a spring and a feeder and an outer one - L-shaped, which was pumped inside the receiver with a vertically standing bolt!

It worked like this: by moving the underbarrel handle, a tubular magazine with a bolt in the rear was retracted and pushed back the trigger, which was put on a platoon. At the same time, the underbarrel handle moved back a little more and made it necessary to raise the tray (“carrier”) with the cartridge onto the loading line. After that, it was necessary to move the handle forward. The tubular magazine also went forward, and the bolt fed the cartridge into the chamber.


Scheme of the device of the shutter of the Stevens rifle "Model 70" from US patent No. 935314

The rifle did not have a manual safety, which seems strange from a modern point of view, given that Stevens regularly emphasized its safety in advertisements. However, in those days it was believed that for a careless attitude to weapons, the entire responsibility lies with the shooter.

Although there was a built-in security system, in which, when the trigger was cocked, the bolt was locked, and the firing pin could not work. But the mechanism of only a new rifle worked well. Dirt and wear led to the fact that she began to act up.

Another drawback was the initial lack of an ejector. The extractor was even double, but the ejector was missing. Therefore, each previous cartridge or spent cartridge case was removed by the next cartridge from the magazine!


Scheme of detailed disassembly of the rifle "Model 70"


And this is how the same disassembly looks in metal! Photo gunsinternational.com

Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't! Sometimes the last sleeve remained in the bolt at all, held by its two extractors. And I had to pull it out with my fingers or turn the rifle over and shake it so that it fell out. Since the mechanism is not closed from above, if the cartridge is removed, it may fall into the mud.

The rifle was loaded by one cartridge, which was inserted into the magazine with the inner tube unscrewed from it with a feeder and a spring. That is, they were laid inside the outer cylindrical case of the store with a wooden forearm, and then, in fact, they were pushed into the inner tube when it was inserted into the outer one!


Rifle "Model 70". Right view. The shutter is closed. Photo eyrie-productions.com


Rifle "Model 70". Right view. The shutter is open. The right extractor plate is clearly visible on it. Photo eyrie-productions.com

Beginning in 1872, Stevens began producing single-barreled shotguns based on his rifles and pistols. The first was the "Model 30" offered in 14 gauge, but it was soon followed by the 10, 12, 16 and 20 gauge models.


Great walnut wood! Rifle "Model 70". Photo gunsinternational.com


This photo shows all the main Stevens rifles (from top to bottom):
1 - Stevens rifle "Model 80". Caliber: .22 S LLR (5,6x10,7mm R rimfire low power). Barrel: round 24 inches. Produced in 1906-1910. 2 - Stevens rifle "Model 70" ("with visible loading"). Caliber: 22 S LLR. Barrel: 24" octagonal. Produced from 1907 to 1932. 3 - Rifle Stevens / Springfield "Model 50", essentially the same "Model 70", but with the "English stock neck". Barrel: Round, 22 3/4" long. 4 - Stevens' favorite single-shot rifle. "Model 17": "Favorite". Caliber: .32. Barrel: 22" octagon. Produced from 1893 to 1939. 5 - Single-shot rifle Stevens "Model 26" "Accurate shot". Caliber: 22 LR ("long rifle"). Barrel: round 22 inches. Produced from 1912 to 1939. 6 - Stevens single-shot rifle. Caliber: 22. Barrel: round 20 inches. 7 - Stevens rifle No. 15 "Mainard Junior". Caliber: 22LR. Barrel: 18" octagon. Produced from 1902 to 1912

The Stevens Model 620 rifle is also known, which happened to sniff gunpowder in the war. Adopted by the Army and Marine Corps during World War II, the 620 remained in service during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. The model had a mount for installing a bayonet. It was intended for firing buckshot at short distances, at which it showed simply deadly results. Over 45 of these guns were produced during World War II, and many remained in service through the Vietnam War.


"Model 620". Photo rockislandauction.com

Interestingly, Stevens rifles, both multi-shot with handguard control and single-shot, with lever-operated bolts, were also equipped with the then optical sights. Very long, very inconvenient, but ... allowing you to shoot very accurately at the optimal distance, calculated on the corresponding cartridges.


Rifles with sniper scopes. Photo 24hourcampfire.com
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    19 November 2022 06: 18
    Scheme of the device of the shutter of a single-shot small-caliber (caliber .22) "rifle for boys"

    Here are the dogs))) I always swore at this when I looked at the old drawings - you sit, you break your head, but it’s not clear nichrome ... The drummer is visible in the top photo, the trigger is smooth, it means the drummer is in the bolt, but here’s how ... If it’s spring-loaded and comes back after the bolt is raised, which means the bolt is collapsible, but it’s even more interesting there, the letters d denote the studs, that is, the axis, which means the drummer rotates around the axis, chtol? Moreover, on the next drummer is clearly visible, but it is on this one that it ends in front with a thin sting. that is, you can’t insert it in front, but if you push it in from behind, it will fly out immediately
    1. +3
      19 November 2022 07: 28
      Good morning everyone!
      I have never delved so deeply into the “drawing abra-ka-dabra”! With all due respect!!!
      As far as I know, Vyacheslav uses drawings from the patents of the Inventors! Given the competition, I can assume that the scheme was possibly initially flawed or imprisoned for the novelty mechanism itself. That is, several drawings "pillar" each with its own "zest" of a technical product.
      However, these are my guesses, good day everyone!
      Thanks to Vyacheslav Olegovich for the article!
      1. Lad
        +3
        19 November 2022 16: 18
        In old patents, I often met drawings of an inoperable product. This is if you go into details. The main thing there was that the product seemed to work on the outside. And all attention was paid to patentable differences. Then, when a working copy was already being produced, everything was brought to mind.
    2. +1
      19 November 2022 16: 37
      Quote from Bingo
      drummer in the gate, but how ...

      The "model 17" diagram shows the striker, and the locking pin that keeps it from getting lost. It is not drawn that a certain length was milled in the drummer itself to make a cutout for this hairpin, so that it would go back and forth, but not fall out. But this is an obvious solution, so we only drew the outline of the drummer channel and its locking pin.
      In patent No. 939142, the striker is not shown, since its layout is in other patents, and it does not affect the essence of the ejector patent.
      The tradition of "conditionally not showing" parts that are not important in this drawing is a very old one. Otherwise, it will be difficult to figure it out, and in pre-computer times, when they drew by hand, redrawing more complex ones took longer.
      If you like to study blueprints, try to find the striker's sear in the bolt in the blueprint below:

      It is there, just hidden under the inscriptions that I can’t remove.
      1. +1
        19 November 2022 16: 41
        Quote: eule
        a certain length is milled in the drummer itself

        I also understood only this option ... But there is still a lot of interesting things - the spring on the drummer is not shown, if the drummer is not spring-loaded, then when the shutter closes abruptly, it can shoot, well, for example, dirt has accumulated ... But, they said right above, they say, details may not be drawn.
  2. +2
    19 November 2022 07: 23
    Vyacheslav hi in my opinion, single-shot rifles are good for hunting, in war the chance of becoming prey with such weapons grows many times, even if the rifle is with a telescopic sight! But, I repeat, this is purely my opinion. And thanks for the article hi !
    1. +3
      19 November 2022 07: 40
      Quote: Thrifty
      good for hunting

      Of course, multi-charges are better
    2. +2
      19 November 2022 07: 56
      As for hunting, you are correct. Beast and bird should be given a chance!
      About the war? Vyacheslav Olegovich outlined in his work a brief history of the "counterra", which in the afternoon will be "one and a half dozen years." Moreover, she made purely military weapons mainly multiply charged.
      Now, for sniper rifles, as far as I know, single-shot sniper rifles are no longer in service with the armies of the world for half a century. The dispute is between self-loading weapons and rifles with manual reloading. There is also an automatic firing option, but these are delights! For example, IEDs in bullup format.
      I was more "excited" by the Stevenson rifle for the "boys". In the light of the attention of the state to the NVP. One of the solutions in the preparation of the younger generation is an indulgence in the sphere of arms trafficking. To obtain initial skills, at no cost to the state.
      Perhaps it makes sense to return to a smoothbore rifle (gun) chambered for a small-caliber 5,6mm cartridge. Let it be one or two models. It is even possible to do a timed reload (with the possibility of a shot no more than once every 30 seconds). Stop accuracy with a nasty trunk. You can even remember about the weakened cartridges of this caliber. For example - Skiff.
      Exhaust in a few years will be unambiguous. We will be able to get people who will have confident initial skills in handling weapons.
      Well, somewhere like that.
      1. +4
        19 November 2022 08: 21
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Well, somewhere like that.

        And the culture of the people will rise in general.
        1. +4
          19 November 2022 13: 10
          Vyacheslav, thanks for the article! good
          As for the NVP and the culture of handling weapons, I completely agree. A man must know which side to "approach" to a rifle and machine gun. I was unlucky when I moved to the fifth or sixth grade (I don’t remember already) the military training classes were removed from the school, the boys were very upset. I had to educate myself" and, as a result, have trouble with the police. smile
          1. +4
            19 November 2022 13: 55
            Quote: Sea Cat
            military training was removed from the school

            And opposite to me, the NVP was replaced by a "military transfer", grades 9-10, where we taught the entire military structure of NATO and the United States in English. lang., learned to interrogate prisoners, translate "instructions" and dismantled the Bran machine gun. Since then, I can not remember him constantly. There were two teachers at once: an Englishwoman and a NVP student.
            1. +2
              19 November 2022 15: 03
              So, with "Bren" you are friends since childhood. smile
              Then from you a very big article about this machine gun and about the Czechoslovak arms business of that time, and about the modern one too. In memory of a "childhood friend", so to speak. wink drinks
              1. +3
                19 November 2022 15: 13
                Quote: Sea Cat
                Then from you a very big article about this machine gun and about the Czechoslovak arms business of that time,

                And will be. About Zb.26 has already been, will be about Bran.
                "In memory of a "childhood friend" - An excellent title for an article.
                1. +2
                  19 November 2022 15: 16
                  It would be nice to combine so that it is clear "where the Englishman's legs grow from."
                  And I remember the article about Zb.26. smile
                2. +1
                  19 November 2022 18: 30
                  "In memory of a "childhood friend"
                  You can take an epigraph from Dragunsky.
                  1. +1
                    20 November 2022 07: 57
                    Quote: 3x3zsave
                    "In memory of a "childhood friend"
                    You can take an epigraph from Dragunsky.

                    Tried to figure out which one, but couldn't figure it out. I'm getting old though...
                    1. +1
                      20 November 2022 08: 16
                      "Childhood Friend", from the series "Deniska's stories".
      2. +3
        19 November 2022 11: 59
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        It is even possible to do a timed reload (with the possibility of a shot no more than once every 30 seconds). Stop accuracy with a nasty trunk.

        It is better to revive DOSAAF at the expense of the state. I have been saying this for a long time - this is not charity, this is what the state NEEDED. To train a potential mob reserve a little, plus a kid to take a hobby is also useful. And how it affects the mobile reserve - after all, all the teeth have already been chewed, how the "Voroshilov arrows" were reflected in the Second World War. Even the Germans wrote that the Russians don't give a damn about the sniper.
  3. +4
    19 November 2022 08: 59
    Thanks, interesting. hi
    I'm interested in the epigraph.
    When I read Permyak as a child, I took the lack of a Berdan cartridge for granted. Well, it wasn't and isn't. But now I'm trying to understand how this is possible?
    Berdan's rifles were in service with the army, and in WWI with the rear and training units. Then they were sold to everyone, and not all of them were drilled out as "frolovki". I mean, there are really a lot of them.
    The case takes place in the current Perm Territory, where there are enough hunters up to ...! And no ammo?! stop
    Or are we talking about special ammunition for cavalry rifles with a slightly weakened charge? so adapting infantry KMKs is never a problem request
    1. +3
      19 November 2022 13: 58
      Quote: Senior Sailor
      Or are we talking about special ammunition for cavalry rifles with a slightly weakened charge?

      I also thought about it. Most likely that is exactly what happened. And how to adapt such cartridges? It can break.
      1. +4
        19 November 2022 14: 39
        Quote: kalibr
        And how to adapt such cartridges?

        I am a little younger than you, but the times when the hunters themselves equipped the cartridges quite caught me. And for those times, the operation is completely ordinary.
        If there are ready-made cartridges, then generally zero problems. You uncork and pour out some of the gunpowder.
        Quote: kalibr
        It can break.

        Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Cossack rifle differed from the infantry long barrel, but not the thickness of the barrel and breech.
        so it's unbelievable.
      2. +3
        19 November 2022 16: 43
        Sabaneev wrote that cavalry rifles had pink instead of white paper around the bullet, which reduced the lead to distinguish between cartridges. The weakening of the charge was necessary to reduce the recoil when firing from a horse, so as not to drop the weapon, the rifle itself is the same in strength. And for hunting, he advised a Cossack and or a dragoon rifle, put on it a trigger guard from an infantry one, and shoot either infantry cartridges or home-made ones. The two-volume "hunter's calendar", in paperback, was published at the beginning of "perestroika", this is from there.
    2. +3
      19 November 2022 14: 25
      The case takes place in the current Perm Territory, where there are enough hunters up to ...! And no ammo?!

      Simply, apparently. You have almost never encountered this issue. There is nothing special about the lack of ammo. Just where they hunted intensively, there were no cartridges. After 10-12 reloads, the cartridge case burns out and cannot be used. Given the fact that new ones were not produced, the hunters were forced to look for a way out. The simplest is the alteration of the brass sleeve of the "three-ruler". The sleeve was cut into three parts. The lower one served as a sleeve, and the middle one, after cutting off the muzzle, is filled with lead, and a semi-shelled bullet is obtained. But all these processes require certain skills and equipment. And the presence of rifle powder. In the absence of this, black powder and a round bullet are used. Attempts to use something like the "Falcon" instead of a rifle or black one ended in failure.
      1. +5
        19 November 2022 14: 55
        Quote from Nephilim
        Given the fact that new ones were not produced

        Are still being produced

        Quote from Nephilim
        The simplest is the alteration of the brass sleeve of the "three-ruler".

        That is, the problem is far-fetched and there are still options even with a complete lack of ammunition?
        Well, I repeat, the Berdanks were in service and managed to fight in Civil War, well, there were hardly any cartridges at all request
        1. +2
          19 November 2022 15: 14
          Still in production

          It is immediately clear that you are far from practical. In the photo - a modern custom remake of 32-caliber smoothbore gun cases.
          And the "native" cartridge has not been produced for a long time. As for "fighting", then if some kind of rifle model was stored in the warehouses, then some kind of stock of cartridges was also stored for it. And no one launched it to hunters for sale. I'm talking about the times of the USSR.
          1. +6
            19 November 2022 15: 51
            Sorry, I don't really understand what you are trying to convey to me?
            What in 1918-20s there was no way to get cartridges for the Berdanka?
            Let me doubt it.
            Quote from Nephilim
            I'm talking about the times of the USSR.

            And the book describes the times Civil War. These rifles were in service. So the ammo were.
            Quote from Nephilim
            And the "native" cartridge has not been produced for a long time.

            When is that a long time ago? Regarding 1918.
            1. +2
              19 November 2022 17: 46
              Sorry, I don't really understand what you are trying to convey to me?

              I am trying to convey to you that there is nothing surprising in the fact that a particular individual in a particular place did not have cartridges for a particular type of weapon in his pocket.
              When is that a long time ago? Regarding 1918.

              That's when they stopped. As the Russian Empire ended, so did the production of Berdan cartridges.
              1. +2
                19 November 2022 18: 43
                You see, it was not so easy for me to bring you that photo. If now, when there are only Berdanks in museums, they make ammunition for them, even if they are at least three times "custom and remake", then in those days there were a lot of these rifles. And if there is a demand, it means that it was somehow satisfied. Sobsno you yourself write
                Quote from Nephilim
                As the Russian Empire ended, so did the production of Berdan cartridges.

                This is literally just now.
                So, it is quite possible to find cartridges.
                Quote from Nephilim
                there is nothing surprising.

                You obviously haven't read the book. Mavrik, aka GG, wore this rifle for a reason, but having entered into something like local self-defense (or gang formation, it depends on the point of view))) and it’s a little stupid to hang around with a Berdan rifle without cartridges under these circumstances. Especially if they're not that hard to find.
                And Mavrik, with all his quirks, is a kapets guy, what a thorough)))
                That is why I was surprised. hi
                1. +2
                  19 November 2022 18: 50
                  Yes, I haven't read the book. Perhaps this is purely the author's intention to dramatize the plot.
  4. +1
    19 November 2022 09: 39
    Quote: Senior Sailor
    As for hunting, you are correct. Beast and bird should be given a chance!

    Chance to get wounded?
    1. +4
      19 November 2022 11: 28
      Quote: acetophenon
      Quote: Senior Sailor
      As for hunting, you are correct. Beast and bird should be given a chance!

      Chance to get wounded?

      This is the essence of good hunting. I'm not sure don't stop.
    2. +1
      19 November 2022 14: 58
      Quote: acetophenon
      Quote: Senior Sailor
      About the hunt

      Wow... how did that happen? belay
  5. +1
    19 November 2022 10: 03
    Interestingly, Stevens rifles, both multi-shot with handguard control and single-shot, with lever-operated bolts, were also equipped with the then optical sights. Very long, very inconvenient, but ... allowing you to shoot very accurately at the optimal distance, calculated on the corresponding cartridges.


    If this weapon was intended for tourists and schoolchildren of that time, amateur sailors and shooting ranges, then its optics could also be made suitable for amateur astronomy, astrophotography or replacing field glasses by placing additional parts of the optical system and lenses in the butt.
    Now this can be repeated at the modern level with built-in cameras, electronics, connection to an iPhone, etc.
    Surely the artists would have drawn a lot of cartoons in the style of "Galileo is at war with the inhabitants of the moon in his telescope."
    https://archive.org/details/agh6462.0005.001.umich.edu/page/50/mode/2up
  6. +4
    19 November 2022 11: 40
    4 - Stevens' favorite single-shot rifle.

    Information about what Stevens had a favorite rifle, history has not preserved.
    And "FAVORITE" RIFLES" is the name of a range of rifles designed for hunting small game and farmers. The first was the 1st Model Favorite of 1884. And then there were (in chronological order) No. 17, No. 20, No. 21 , No. 21 Ladies Model, No. 16, No. 16-1/2, No. 23—Sure Shot, No. 15, No. 15-1/2, No. 14, No. 14-1/2, No. 65 (bolt-action model!), No. 12, No. 26, No. 26-1/2, No. 11—Junior Models with (1/2) are smoothbore rifled versions.
    Therefore the signature "This photo shows all the main Stevens rifles" somewhat out of touch with reality. Moreover, it does not have rifles that Stevens Arms at the turn of the XNUMXth and XNUMXth centuries brought the greatest fame to - sports, the Ideal Schuetzen series.

    Target rifle Stevens Ideal Schuetzen No 54 22 LR & 32-40.
  7. +4
    19 November 2022 14: 00
    Interestingly, Stevens rifles, both multi-shot with handguard control and single-shot, with lever-operated bolts, were also equipped with the then optical sights.

    Even more interesting, these J. Stevens Arms Co. and produced. Moreover, these sights were very perfect and quite popular, which is not surprising, the lenses for these sights were produced by the famous Bausch & Lomb. That is, J. Stevens Arms Co. was among the pioneers in the field of creation and production of optical sights.
    1. +4
      19 November 2022 15: 11
      Quote from Nephilim
      That is, J. Stevens Arms Co. was among the pioneers in the field of creation and production of optical sights.

      Didn't know this. I have never been interested in optics.
      1. +2
        19 November 2022 15: 27
        I did not know this.

        There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
        Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

        Nothing surprising. After all, you are interested in the issue from the position of a reporter - to find information that can be used for an article, and not on a specialized resource, but on a popular one.
        1. +4
          19 November 2022 18: 06
          Quote from Nephilim
          on a specialized resource

          Tired of publishing on specialized ...
          1. 0
            19 November 2022 19: 04
            I'm tired of publishing on specialized ones for 32 years.
            ..
            Sorry for the sarcasm, but for some reason I don’t remember your articles in GANS.
            1. 0
              20 November 2022 07: 55
              GANS - I don't know what it is. I have them all in E-lab - this is an electronic library of publications of higher education workers. With the transition to the Bologna system, they began to demand from us 1-2 grants, 1 monograph in 5 years, 1-2 manuals, and at least 25 articles. Otherwise, you were not taken to the competition for the new 5 years. Well, 1 monograph was too much, even participation in it was considered cool, but 25 people mastered it. Well, since I considered myself better than many of my colleagues, I tried not to publish less than 40 articles. Moreover, in magazines abroad and VAK, and not in the collections of local universities, where they were published according to the principle you tell me - I tell you. By the way, if you look at my latest textbook on public opinion management, you will see that there are many authors. Is it clear why?
              1. 0
                20 November 2022 09: 26
                GANS - I don't know what it is.

                This is a specialized weapons publication, just for small arms. I did not mean "in general", but specifically small arms.
                And about "many authors" - here the picture is standard - you can't write yourself, ask to be co-authors for a "small share".
                1. 0
                  20 November 2022 10: 26
                  Quote from Nephilim
                  specialized weapons edition

                  If my materials were not there, then they did not agree on the price.
                  1. 0
                    20 November 2022 16: 05
                    If my materials were not there, then they did not agree on the price.

                    What you will not refuse is a sense of modesty.
                    It is one of the leading American gun magazines. There is no bullshit going on. And the fees are much more serious than at VO. You can write one article per month. But precisely "write", not "write off".
                    1. +1
                      20 November 2022 19: 29
                      Quote from Nephilim
                      And the fees are much more serious than at VO.

                      Yes, seriously. But it makes no sense to write to them. About what? They have all the weapons, including all of ours. What can I tell them new and about what? St. Petersburg with the Art Museum is far away, the fee for trips there will not pay off. The Museum of the Soviet Army in Moscow does not contain any novelties for them. So it's a pointless business from the beginning. And where I had a new one, I was published in the magazines "Fine scale modeler" (USA), "Tankette", "Military modelling", "Battle place", "Military wagamer" (England), "Plastic modeller" (Australia) , "Modelage" (Poland), "Modelarzh" (Czechoslovakia), "La figuring" (Belgium), and Japan - "Model graphics", "Modelismo" (Spain). The latter contained articles about the T-26 in the civil war, in Japan ... a lot of things, in England too, for example, about the "correct" Prince Svyatoslav (figurine), about the uniform of the White Guards, archers, the Penza fortress, in "Voheimer" - about the battles: "Massacre" and "Kulikovskaya ...". And "Battle Place" for the last time ordered me an article about the field
                      Borodin. By the way, there was a fee of 80 dollars. Not so much, for 10 pages and lots of photos. And it was in 2012. Anniversary. And then how it cut off. Relations between our countries have deteriorated. And that's how I would write now. Zeynalov and I wrote many articles with his drawings...
                    2. +1
                      20 November 2022 19: 35
                      Quote from Nephilim
                      What you will not refuse is a sense of modesty.

                      Well, when your scientific and popular science articles and books were published in the USA, England, Australia, Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Japan, Belgium ... then ... why be modest? There are 5 books in Germany, 4 in England, now 9 in Singapore. Read about the articles below. And it's popular. Scientific all on E-lab.
                      1. 0
                        20 November 2022 19: 47
                        Well, when your scientific and popular science articles and books were published in the USA, England, Australia, Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Japan, Belgium ... then ... why be modest?

                        Yeah! From these positions, I present the dimensions of the CSF, suppose Landau Lev Davydovich.
                      2. +1
                        20 November 2022 20: 16
                        Quote from Nephilim
                        suppose Landau Lev Davydovich.

                        You are some kind of strange ... It is necessary to equate people of the same social stratum, and informational significance. Nuclear physics is not comparable to history. But on this it is easier to compare. And... Academician Aganbegyan's books and mine can be seen together in the textbook for the 6th grade on additional reading. A trifle, but nice!
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                    3. +1
                      20 November 2022 19: 39
                      Quote from Nephilim
                      There is no bullshit going on.

                      You just have to skillfully serve it. In "Military to Gamer" in England, I gave translated materials from a textbook for grade 7 + drawings of graduate girls from our art school. And it went off with a bang, because for them it was God's revelation. Then!