The connection of motor ships between Kherson and the left bank of the Dnieper was stopped

34
The connection of motor ships between Kherson and the left bank of the Dnieper was stopped

Kherson residents were informed that the last ship had already left for the right bank. This means that now the communication of motor ships between Kherson and the left bank of the Dnieper has been completely stopped.

About it сообщает military correspondent of "Komsomolskaya Pravda" Alexander Kots in his Telegram channel.

He refers to the schedule of Kherson ships. It is noted there that today two flights were made to Oleshki, at 8 and 12 o'clock, and also one flight to Golaya Pristan, also at noon. And from tomorrow there will be no more flights.

The Kherson regional administration also reports on the temporary cessation of traffic across the Dnieper in Telegram. The authorities claim that this is due to the completion of the evacuation, as well as the growing danger to the local population. The ban applies to barges, river taxis and other vehicles. Public transport is allowed, as well as the delivery of food and medicine.

Civil transport can cross to the left bank, as before, through the river port. From there it will be possible to cross the Dnieper by water transport. For delivery to the left bank of personal vehicles, you can use a barge.

The suspension of transport links across the Dnieper due to the evacuation of residents in the Kherson regional administration was announced last week. According to Kirill Stremousov, a representative of the regional leadership, people are being evacuated due to the intensified shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  • https://vk.com/kherson_adm
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    7 November 2022 14: 21
    Alea iacta est?

    The connection of motor ships between Kherson and the left bank of the Dnieper was stopped
    1. +5
      7 November 2022 14: 44
      Quote from Magellan
      Alea iacta est?

      The connection of motor ships between Kherson and the left bank of the Dnieper was stopped

      It is believed that Caesar, when crossing the Rubicon, uttered this phrase not in Latin, but in Greek: ανερρίφθω κύβος
  2. +13
    7 November 2022 14: 21
    This message (yesterday's) can be interpreted in different ways. The video in the cart-Kherson is almost empty. If there is neither strength nor opportunity, then this is the right decision to save the population, take everyone out. In general, the majority did not believe in this in the spring. What forces will we liberate Nikolaev and Odessa if the fate of Kherson is not clear?
    1. +8
      7 November 2022 14: 25
      What forces will we liberate Nikolaev and Odessa

      IMHO, there is no point in even thinking about it.
    2. 0
      7 November 2022 14: 30
      Quote: dmi.pris
      What forces will we liberate Nikolaev and Odessa if the fate of Kherson is not clear?

      It is impossible to answer unambiguously. The forces and means necessary to solve problems are constantly changing.
      1. +5
        7 November 2022 14: 46
        I understand that the tasks are already different ....
        1. +5
          7 November 2022 15: 20
          Well, yes - the task is to prepare for the next heroic defense of Sevastopol.
    3. +17
      7 November 2022 14: 31
      Do you think that the Kremlin’s plans include the liberation of Odessa and Nikolaev? Yes, we lost Kharkov forever! This war was started for the sake of some selfish interests, everything was taught to us as defending the interests of the people of Luhansk and Donetsk now regions of Russia. But, the operation is not being forced, giving the Kiev region the opportunity to prepare not only the army, but also create a bunch of fortified areas. At this rate, we will never be able to take Odessa! For constant agreements, gestures of goodwill, and other blows to the back of the army and the country reduce the combat potential of the army, and herds of mediocre parquet generals know how to fight in the kitchen with a wife or mistress, and not a ha battlefield against vushnikov!
      1. -14
        7 November 2022 15: 05
        Don’t worry, we’ll take everything you need, just understand, yes, we could grab huge territories right away, and then what, how to protect, how to integrate, restore?! Our economy is under strong sanctions pressure, it is not yet completely known how we will digest the Kherson, Zaporozhye regions, the LPR, the DPR, huge sums will be needed to restore them, this is an additional burden on our budget, and we have no rubber. You can bite off a lot at a time and choke, or you can pinch off a piece and gradually digest it.
        1. +5
          7 November 2022 15: 24
          Within the framework of your wonderful logic, in order to reduce the burden on the budget, Ukrainians need to give up not only Kherson, Donetsk and Crimea, but also all subsidized regions of the Russian Federation, it turns out?
          1. -3
            7 November 2022 15: 36
            Yes, and here it is, you seem to have completely understood nothing from my post! Learn to read first, I didn’t write anywhere that we need to abandon the Crimea, Donetsk and subsidized regions, I mean that our budget will not be able to cope with a sharp jump in spending at once, with not much increased income, from where you will take the difference in funds, there may not be enough reserves !
            1. +8
              7 November 2022 15: 44
              Why start then? Why take / liberate territories for retention, the assimilation of which is not and is not expected in the foreseeable future of resources?
              1. -5
                7 November 2022 16: 09
                Ask these questions to Putin, maybe he will answer you.
        2. -1
          7 November 2022 16: 15
          how to protect, how to integrate, restore?

          And it would be better for the budget and integration if they were liberated without destruction than when they were liberated, but with destroyed cities and infrastructure, with a more embittered population ...
        3. +1
          7 November 2022 17: 53
          You are completely wrong about "take away". We will release. But this is only if the gentlemen behind the Spasskaya Tower desire and resolve.
      2. 0
        7 November 2022 15: 17
        I completely agree about the generals. But about the rest ... there will still be any mobilization (my personal opinion)
      3. +2
        7 November 2022 16: 25
        Quote: Thrifty
        But, the operation is not forced
        Now the results of the afterburner will come out sideways.
        Quote: Thrifty
        and herds of mediocre parquet generals know how to fight in the kitchen with their wife or mistress, and not on the battlefield against the sushniks!
        And how, without fighting, can you distinguish parquet from front-line soldiers?

        Quote: Thrifty
        Do you think that the plans of the Kremlin include the liberation of Odessa and Nikolaev?
        Of course it is included, but so far there are not enough forces and means. The reason is banal, not correctly (not professionally) assessed and calculated the strategy.
        It's annoying, but fixable.

        Quote: Thrifty
        For constant agreements, gestures of goodwill, and other blows to the back of the army and the country reduce the combat potential of the army
        Definitely, there were sleeping bookmarks in the Ministry of Defense.
    4. -1
      7 November 2022 15: 21
      What forces will we liberate Nikolaev and Odessa if the fate of Kherson is not clear?

      Dig in to the east. Temporarily score on Odessa, Nikolaev, Kharkov, etc. In winter, all the forces to throw on the blockade of Kyiv.
  3. +5
    7 November 2022 14: 27
    In any case, evacuation is the right and timely decision...
    But Kherson must be protected! And not for show, but for real. In the end, if 50 thousand Nazis, with the powerful support of armored vehicles, could not do anything with 6 thousand ordinary Russian guards who were not even dug in for two days in the Kharkov region, then why should Kherson fall when, according to the assurances of the authorities, it has been turned into a fortress, and keep his regular troops in much larger numbers than in September Izyum and Balakleya ...
    1. +2
      7 November 2022 14: 47
      Quote: Peter_Koldunov
      ordinary Russian guardsmen for two days in the Kharkiv region - why should Kherson fall, when, according to the assurances of the authorities, it has been turned into a fortress, and its regular troops are holding in much larger numbers than Izyum and Balakleya in September ...

      And Kharkov, like Sumy and other large cities, is not necessary to take. They must be blocked and left in the rear. Mariupol is an example for us - more than 2 thousand surrendered. The garrisons of blocked cities will also surrender. The main thing is to stop attempts to break through. You can arrange "green corridors" - the exit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but without any weapons.
      1. +8
        7 November 2022 14: 55
        What to do with the population of these cities? They hate us fiercely
        1. +3
          7 November 2022 15: 26
          Even strange - why?
          The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information.
      2. +12
        7 November 2022 15: 32
        Do you even understand what you write? Here we cannot move the enemy away from the Donbass, and you are already talking about Kharkov, Sumy, Odessa. This requires hundreds of thousands of military personnel and equipment. Do you see the preparations for such a large-scale event? Mobilized it for the current front line. I see that the "gentlemen" from above want to "turn the stuffing back" and agree on something behind the scenes.
    2. +3
      7 November 2022 14: 57
      Are you serious? Another gesture is being prepared.
  4. -1
    7 November 2022 14: 44
    In order to reduce the danger to the population, it is necessary to move the front forward farther away, but here I don’t understand it back or what?!?!!
  5. -1
    7 November 2022 14: 50
    We'll see, time will tell ...... who turns out to be right, those who are for the fall of Kherson or those who are for the capture of Odessa ... we'll see ..... "weather" forecasts are not appropriate here .....
    1. 0
      7 November 2022 14: 58
      There are also third ones - to defend Kherson, to liberate Donbass and Zaporozhye. These are our lands, aren't they? This is my opinion. It's pointless to think about the rest and you're right - this is not a weather forecast
  6. +9
    7 November 2022 15: 01
    Preparations for the new goodwill gesture have been completed. The population is already calm about this. Previously, even Gorbachev served for world peace, surrendering the country. Now similar moments, albeit on a smaller scale
  7. +13
    7 November 2022 15: 04
    There is a lot to say about the current situation about Kherson (and not only): evil, painful, something that many people already understand, but are still afraid to say out loud. There is something to say, but there is absolutely no desire to be drawn into a discussion about this. And it will not work briefly here, because you will have to give arguments for each moment in order to get an understandable logical series. And since there is no mood and desire, I will say briefly, without focusing on the dates indicated by him (they can be shifted in any direction depending on various circumstances), that I fully share the opinion of SW. Lev Vershinin (Putnik1):
    So, today, when an avalanche (from outside) has already come and covered, and the armored men, no matter how many there are, cannot cope due to the fact that the System is rotten, I can afford a forecast, the accuracy of which I am sure: if Kherson is surrendered, no matter how beautiful the explanations are, this will be the beginning of the Landslide (from within), and to think about how to save themselves, the citizens of the Russian Federation have three years.
    And if Kherson is not surrendered, there is hope...

    PS Nevertheless, I will explain a little on my own, as I see it: Yesterday's letter from the Marines from the 155th brigade, which, incidentally, is min. Defense today already bravura refutes and reports on the unprecedented successes near Pavlovka and the losses of the enemy: and in some areas 9 to 1 in people and technology.
    So, min. I do not believe the defense, but the letter itself, the way it was filed, bypassing mines. defense, suggests that trust, so far only in the command, has already been lost and further, if also Kherson, will be on the rise. For this, for the loss of trust, a separate "thank you" to the alternatively gifted from the Kremlin, namely for the steps taken to carefully preserve Ukrainian bridges and railways. knots, for saving the Azov people from the promised tribunal (including those who tortured and finished off our prisoners), the "brilliant" Kharkov redeployment, a grain deal and much more.
    And yes, I also agree with t. V. Alksnis: if Ukraine, as you vociferously assure, has signed guarantees on a grain deal, then demonstrate to the World and the people this result (the document itself) of a "brilliant diplomatic victory", otherwise, against the background of denials from Ukrainian "partners", all this history smells too bad, and the further the more so.
    1. +10
      7 November 2022 15: 33
      That's right - the marines, the sovereign's servicemen, the elite of the army, they write a letter not to the Ministry of Defense, the General Staff, not even to the Presidential Administration, not to Moscow at all, but to the governor of Primorye, thus showing who, in their opinion, is more worthy of their trust. What's next? Will the units swear allegiance to the governors at the place of deployment? And not even the national ones, which no longer seems impossible surrealism to someone, but the central Russian regions?
      1. 0
        7 November 2022 16: 30
        the letter is not written to the Moscow Region, the General Staff, not even to the Presidential Administration, not to Moscow at all

        Because there is no trust, the stated goal is not clear:
        if denafixation, then why are the Nazis released?! ;
        if de-Sovietization, then why have not everything that was built Soviet been destroyed to the ground?!
        If demilitarization, then why weren't all deliveries of weapons from the West bombed and the Armed Forces of Ukraine destroyed without the help of the West?!
        If you weren't ready for a strange military operation, then you shouldn't even have started! Some undercover liberal fuss, all the same, children are abroad, and the capital in the accounts is pulling the country towards .....
    2. +1
      9 November 2022 18: 30
      Traitors from the Ministry of Defense have already announced the surrender of Kherson
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +3
    7 November 2022 17: 31
    We took the grandmothers, and the young ones were taken to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  10. 0
    9 November 2022 18: 28
    Sold Kherson. There was hope for Surovikin, and he, like a paw, gives our lands

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"