First combat use: Kh-32 missiles in Special Operations

81
First combat use: Kh-32 missiles in Special Operations
Modified Tu-22M3 with experimental Kh-32 missiles. Photo Airwar.ru


As part of the current Special Operation, the Russian aerospace forces are using a variety of aviation means of destruction. Recently it became known that Kh-32 air-to-surface guided missiles are used to destroy some Ukrainian military facilities. With their help, Tu-22M3 long-range bombers can hit both enemy ships and surface targets.



Missiles in operation


Tu-22M3 missile bombers took part in the Special Operation almost from the first weeks and performed various tasks. In particular, with the help of various types of air bombs, they destroyed enemy forces on the territory of the Mariupol Azovstal plant.

The first reports of the use of guided missiles by such bombers came in early July from the UK Department of Defense. It was alleged that Russian aviation uses Kh-22 and Kh-32 anti-ship missiles. At the same time, as always, the British military accused the Russian Aerospace Forces of attacking exclusively civilian targets. Naturally, no evidence of this was given.

New information about the use of modern missiles for the Tu-22M3 appeared only the other day. On November 2, RIA reported about this News citing an unnamed informed source. The latter confirmed that long-range aviation uses Kh-32 missiles and with their help destroys various enemy targets.

It is reported that as part of the Special Operation, Tu-22M3 aircraft, which underwent the necessary modifications and became carriers of Kh-32 missiles, conducted a series of launches of such products. The targets for the missiles were ground facilities of the Ukrainian military infrastructure. These launches fully confirmed the high accuracy and effectiveness of the used missiles, and also showed their ability to hit ground targets. At the same time, not a single missile was intercepted by enemy air defenses.

Unfortunately, the details of the combat use of missiles are unknown. The number of launches, the flight range of the products, the accuracy of the hit and the impact on the target are not specified.


Upgraded Tu-22M3M. Photo PJSC "Tupolev"

The source disclosed some information about the aircraft carrying missiles participating in the Special Operation. So, the X-32 anti-ship missiles are intended for the upgraded Tu-22M3M bombers. In addition, a number of Tu-22M3 combatants who have not yet undergone such modernization received the necessary devices and can now also use the new missile. It was these missile carriers that attacked Ukrainian targets.

Based on the results of such combat use, the source made an interesting conclusion. He noted that the Kh-32 missile is no longer a specialized anti-ship weapons. Now we are talking about a universal complex capable of hitting surface and small-sized ground targets.

Deep upgrade


The modern Kh-32 air-to-surface missile is a deep modernization of the old Kh-22 anti-ship missile, which has serious flaws. The development of an updated product began in the late eighties and was carried out at the Raduga State Design Bureau (now part of the Tactical Missiles Corporation). The future X-32 was created in difficult times, and the pace of work left much to be desired.

The situation improved only in the middle of the 2013s. By the end of the decade, the project was completed and preparations for testing began. Not later than 32, experimental Kh-2016 missiles first took to the air on a regular carrier. Then there were test launches. The work continued until XNUMX and ended with the adoption of a new missile into service.

During this period, plans were drawn up to modernize carrier aircraft. The main carrier of the X-32 in the future was to be a deeply modernized Tu-22M3M bomber. In addition, as a temporary measure, a partial re-equipment of a certain number of existing Tu-22M3s was proposed, allowing them to use new missiles.

During the first years after the adoption of the Kh-32 missiles, they were used only during exercises and additional tests. The first episodes of real combat use took place in recent months - as part of the Special Operation in Ukraine. It is curious that the X-32, made on the basis of anti-ship missiles, is still used only against ground targets.


Rocket Kh-22. Photo Missilery.info

Technical features


The modern Kh-32 missile is made on the basis of the old Kh-22 and is as similar as possible to it. Some technical solutions have been retained, and individual units and products are used, both in their original and modified form. At the same time, key components were replaced to improve all the main characteristics.

Like the base product, the X-32 is built in a cylindrical body with an animated radio-transparent nose fairing. The hull has a mid-positioned triangular wing. In the tail - plumage with a stabilizer, keel and lower crest. The total length of the rocket does not exceed 11,7 m. The wingspan is approx. 3m.

The X-32 uses a new model liquid-propellant rocket engine with improved performance. In addition, by changing the layout of the hull, it was possible to increase the capacity of the fuel tanks. According to various sources, the rocket is capable of reaching speeds of up to 4,5-5 Mach, climbing to a height of at least 30 km and flying to a range of 1000 km. There are different flight profiles to hit different targets.

The main disadvantages of the old X-22 are associated with the obsolescence of the radar homing head. For the Kh-32, a new active-passive seeker of this type was developed. It is built on a modern element base, has higher range and accuracy characteristics, and is also protected from interference. Such a head is capable of detecting and tracking not only surface ships, but also targets on land, incl. surrounded by other objects. The rocket goes to the turn of the GOS with the help of inertial and satellite navigation.

The X-22 missile carried a high-explosive-cumulative warhead weighing 960 kg. The combat equipment of the new X-32 is unknown. At the same time, there is information about the use of a reduced warhead on a modern rocket, which made it possible to increase the fuel supply.

The carriers of the Kh-32 missile are Tu-22M3/M3M aircraft with the necessary set of equipment. Apparently, for this they retain the regular beam holders under the wing or fuselage, but receive new control devices, data input, etc. As with the older product, weapons are transported under the wing or in the cargo hold in a semi-recessed position.

Combination of benefits


The strike aviation complex, which includes the Tu-22M3/M3M long-range bomber and Kh-32 missile, is one of the most interesting acquisitions of our Aerospace Forces in recent years. It most clearly shows how, based on existing platforms and samples, it is possible to create a new complex with enhanced performance and a number of important advantages.


Three Kh-22 products on Tu-22M3. New Kh-32 missiles are suspended in the same way. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

The old X-22 missile was distinguished by high flight performance and carried a heavy warhead sufficient to destroy ships of large displacement. At the same time, its seeker and controls have long been outdated. The new X-32 project provides for the preservation of the overall architecture and airframe of the old product while replacing all key components. Due to the new engine, the flight range has been improved, and the modern seeker is stable and reliable.

Similarly, the modernization of carrier aircraft in the form of Tu-22M3 is being carried out. The airframe and a number of key systems are retained, but weapons controls are replaced, etc. Moreover, a complete modernization of the bomber is not necessary. For the use of Kh-32 missiles, a partial replacement of instruments is sufficient.

The result is a strike aircraft complex with a number of advantages. First of all, this is a large radius achieved due to the characteristics of the rocket and carrier. In addition, the Kh-32 is capable of operating in difficult jamming conditions and providing guidance not only to surface targets. With all this, the high flight speed greatly complicates the timely detection and interception of a missile, and the preservation of a heavy warhead guarantees the defeat of various targets.

Confirmed by practice


In the recent past, the complex consisting of the Tu-22M3 bomber and Kh-32 missile passed all the tests and confirmed the design characteristics. Then its capabilities were demonstrated in tests. Now it has come to full-fledged combat use against real targets in the form of enemy infrastructure facilities.

Reportedly, the first series of launches ended with the defeat of the designated ground targets, and the enemy air defense was unable to repel the strikes. The first practical test has been successfully passed. It is quite possible that the combat use of Kh-32 missiles will not end there, and new reports of hit targets will come in the foreseeable future.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    7 November 2022 05: 55
    All this is good, but the warheads are not nuclear. Consequently, there should be no less missiles in the arsenal than target objects.
    And what, there are thousands of these missiles? Or will they - not by 2030?
    1. +6
      7 November 2022 06: 15
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      missiles should be in the arsenal no less than target objects.

      But what, there are thousands of objects for the use of these particular missiles? Or is it the only missile in the arsenal? You have to think wider.
      1. 0
        8 November 2022 00: 17
        What, there are thousands of objects

        There are many, many more...
        Or is it the only rocket

        But what, other missiles are also immeasurable? Or what about uniforms?
        1. +1
          8 November 2022 13: 54
          Oh my God!!! What else is wrong with the uniform?
          1. -1
            8 November 2022 19: 24
            I watch "dissatisfied Russians" and the adherents of nuclear weapons are back again. Light probably gave))
          2. +2
            8 November 2022 22: 40
            Oh my God!!! What else is wrong with the uniform?

            Yes, little things - missing 1.5 million.
            1. 0
              9 November 2022 01: 53
              What are you? And why are the people silent?
              1. +1
                10 November 2022 06: 25
                What are you? And why are the people silent?

                Yes, what are you!
                Our people are so literate, educated, they will always find a genius spirit!
    2. +2
      7 November 2022 12: 38
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      All this is good, but the warheads are not nuclear. Consequently, there should be no less missiles in the arsenal than target objects.
      And what, there are thousands of these missiles? Or will they - not by 2030?

      Apparently, their time has not yet come. For peace of mind, I'm inserting:

      You can read more details here:
      https://vvs.moscow/weapon/krylataja-raketa-h-32/
      1. +1
        8 November 2022 13: 16
        Man speaks without knowledge. At x22 tactical was developed for sure.
    3. +1
      8 November 2022 15: 35
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      All this is good, but the warheads are not nuclear.

      And what prevents you from installing a special warhead on the X-32? When working on AUG and KUG, this is quite justified and in demand.
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      And what, there are thousands of these missiles?

      Even the mighty USSR, which did not skimp and did not waste time on the production of missiles, had about 2000 of these Kh-22s in its arsenal. And this despite the fact that the Tu-22M2 and Tu-22M3 were in service with about 300 naval aviation units. , plus a certain amount of Tu-16 and Tu-95 \ 142 capable of carrying this.
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      Or will they - not by 2030?

      The RF Armed Forces today have 61 Tu-22M3 \ M3M, no more than 30 units are being upgraded. , if at all such modernization takes place. So where is such a breakthrough ("thousands") X-32? Moreover, the latest hypersonic products with ramjet engines, which have smaller dimensions and weights, are on the way.
      The Tu-22M3 remaining in the Russian Federation will have enough of the order of 2000 X-22s and the number of X-32s that the industry gave. For old Kh-22s, it is enough to conjure with the navigation unit (as they did with the Iranian "Shaheds" to get "Geran-2") and the entire arsenal can be used for high-precision strikes with warheads of 1000 kg. Proper disposal of good ammunition is the key to victory.
  2. -8
    7 November 2022 05: 57
    The bridge was listed as a typical late fashion target. X-22.
    Three Kh-22 products on Tu-22M3. New Kh-32 missiles are suspended in the same way
    They write that three rockets were suspended only for transportation.
    1. KCA
      0
      7 November 2022 06: 32
      Why all of a sudden? At reduced range, three are hung
      1. -2
        7 November 2022 06: 39
        Quote: KCA
        Why all of a sudden? At reduced range, three are hung
        Do you have other sources? Share.

        I use public...
        As a normal load, the combatant Tu-22M and Tu-95K-22 could carry 1, and the maximum - 2 UR D-2M or D-2N. In total, at least a thousand X-22 missiles of all variants were fired.

        Three X-22 missiles for all types of aircraft were suspended only in the transport version, this is due to the difficulties of transporting the missile. To transport one X-22, an AN-12 aircraft or one railway platform was required.
        1. KCA
          -2
          7 November 2022 06: 44
          I had, but the website of the State Design Bureau "Rainbow" is closed, only the website of the KTRV, and there is generally zero information, nothing
    2. +3
      7 November 2022 20: 31
      so it is - three missiles - a reloading and transport option, one of the wing beams (I don’t remember which one) is parallel to the fuselage one and launching two at once is impossible
      1. 0
        8 November 2022 08: 40
        Quote: novel xnumx
        so it is - three missiles - a reloading and transport option, one of the wing beams (I don’t remember which one) is parallel to the fuselage one and launching two at once is impossible

        Thank you! hi
        If the fuel is encapsulated, then probably they didn’t drain it when the missiles were suspended?
        1. +2
          8 November 2022 10: 30
          I served when the x-22s were, refueled and drained, but mostly they were training. dry
          1. 0
            8 November 2022 10: 41
            Quote: novel xnumx
            I served when the x-22s were, refueled and drained, but mostly they were training. dry

            Then it is clear why the Tu-22 could be transferred without any problems.
            1. +2
              8 November 2022 11: 29
              and Tu-95 on which I served
              The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information
  3. -2
    7 November 2022 06: 04
    Naturally, no evidence of this was given.

    Whenever you hear this on-duty phrase, immediately open a search on the Internet.

    In the age of smartphones and video cameras installed everywhere, it is impossible to hide the fact of using the Kh-22/32, a rocket with outstanding dimensions and a monumental appearance


    Here it was a pure accident. The legitimate target was a military plant in Kremenchuk, located literally behind the shopping center

    Why did the rocket choose the shopping center instead? Everything becomes clear if you remember the purpose of the X-22/32. The homing head of an anti-ship missile selects the largest contrast target. In the same way, when operating against ground targets, the GOS "captures" the largest, standing separately buildings. Soviet designers rightly believed that this would allow the GOS to find and effectively hit the buildings of factory workshops. In Soviet times, it was not yet known that in the future huge shopping centers the size of a factory would appear in cities.

    Here is such a story, if we speak without lies and attempts to embellish it, hide it, or, on the contrary, “inflate” the sensation
    1. KCA
      +2
      7 November 2022 06: 34
      The fact that the head could be with INS does not bother you? If, supposedly, special, study the options for equipping X-22 and 32
      1. 0
        7 November 2022 06: 53
        Yeah, but how can you get into anything with such a head? Learn "specialist" lol

        https://pikabu.ru/story/kryilataya_raketa_kh32_9471085

        https://pikabu.ru/story/raketnoe_oruzhie_samoleta_tu22m3_9255824
      2. -1
        7 November 2022 10: 49
        Systems with INS have three bast shoes on the map.
        1. KCA
          0
          7 November 2022 12: 00
          Come on? Now it’s not V-1 or V-2 that fly, but AMS Luna and Venus also flew along the INS, and somehow hit it, and here the KR, just something
          1. +3
            7 November 2022 12: 12
            venus and the moon are large, + -300 m do not make the weather, and the goals of the CD are often not very large. Accuracy is not enough
            1. KCA
              -4
              7 November 2022 12: 40
              In fact, the QUO of the KR and ICBMs is no more than 10 meters
              1. +2
                7 November 2022 12: 57
                You seem to have a very vague idea of ​​the question
                Topol M
                Accuracy, KVO 150-200 meters[2]

                And then, if everything goes well
          2. -1
            8 November 2022 19: 31
            Well, there is astrocorrection. As well as on strategists
        2. +2
          7 November 2022 16: 29
          Systems with INS have three bast shoes on the map.

          In its purest form, without adjustment, it is. Zero is leaving.
    2. -1
      7 November 2022 06: 51
      Quote: Santa Fe
      In the age of smartphones and video cameras installed everywhere, it is impossible to hide the fact of using the Kh-22/32, a rocket with outstanding dimensions and a monumental appearance

      Yes, it's good to spread fakes already.
      Even a child can see photoshop.
      And according to the events in Kremenchuk, it’s better to tell how the dill covered the railway station together with their citizens from Tochka U.
      1. -2
        7 November 2022 10: 52
        And according to the events in Kremenchuk, it’s better to tell how the dill covered the railway station together with their citizens from Tochka U.

        Can you provide a link to when it was?
      2. +5
        7 November 2022 16: 38
        Yes, it's good to spread fakes already.
        Even a child can see photoshop.

        +++ An ordinary CCTV camera does not have such a high light sensitivity to fix a rapidly falling missile without smearing its image across the frame. In the presented photo, the image of the rocket is not blurred.
    3. -2
      7 November 2022 09: 23
      . The homing head of an anti-ship missile selects the largest contrast target. In the same way, when operating against ground targets, the GOS "captures" the largest, standing separately buildings. Soviet designers rightly believed that this would allow the GOS to find and effectively hit the buildings of factory workshops. In Soviet times, it was not yet known that in the future huge shopping centers the size of a factory would appear in cities.


      Well, the X-32 is no longer a Soviet missile, but a Russian one put into service in 2016 and its seeker is active-passive and operates on the same principle as a similar active-passive seeker of the same X-35U, used in Syria from the Su -34 and for ground targets. If the Kh-35U can work on ground targets with high accuracy, then why can’t the Kh-32? 22 are similar, but this is fundamentally not true. Between the adoption of the latest version of the Kh-22 and the new Kh-32 for almost 22 years. Naturally, the requirements for missiles, as well as technologies, have changed during this time.
      . as the source explained, “today, the Kh-32, in essence, is no longer a specialized anti-ship missile, but a universal missile system, which is capable of hitting both surface and small-sized ground targets with equally high efficiency.” The Kh-32 was put into service in 2016 and is intended for a deeply modernized version of the Tu-22M3 - Tu-22M3M. The aircraft itself has not yet entered service with the Aerospace Forces, its flight tests are continuing, however, the rocket has already been tested on converted Tu-22M3s. The new rocket was developed to replace the Kh-22 and inherited a slightly modified airframe from it. According to open data, she received a modernized engine with increased thrust, new digital electronic equipment, including a computer complex, an active-passive radar station protected from interference, and electronic countermeasure systems. The maximum speed of the rocket is close to hypersonic, it is about Mach 5, the range of application is 1000 kilometers.


      https://ria.ru/20221102/udary-1828547804.html
    4. +1
      7 November 2022 11: 03
      Quote: Santa Fe
      In the age of smartphones and video cameras installed everywhere, the fact of using X-22/32 cannot be hidden

      As already indicated, in the age of photoshops and video editors, inserting any rocket into the frame is a matter of several minutes, even for a user of below average qualifications.

      Quote: Santa Fe
      The homing head of an anti-ship missile selects the largest contrast target.

      At the same time, with anti-ship application, the missile will almost inevitably choose a corner reflector floating along the waves.
      1. 0
        7 November 2022 12: 13
        or firing traps. And there is. The main thing is to have time to shoot or drop
    5. +6
      7 November 2022 13: 02
      the top shot of the "fotozhaba" is a falling object with linear dimensions under the "union" carrier and yes x-22 flying at 20-40 km in height falls on the object almost vertically and civilian surveillance cameras show supersonic in the form of a shadow. And if about the shopping center, then the first 2 hours after the impact in the cloud, there was a view from the pier camera on the lake from the opposite side, where the moment of destruction of the factory floor from a direct hit was visible, the camera could not fix the rocket itself due to speed
      1. +1
        8 November 2022 13: 36
        Yes, and if you stupidly look at the numbers. On average, such cameras have 15 fps at best, i.e. 15 frames including key frames. Those. the frame is made full 1 time in 5-10, intermediate frames are filled only with changed details, or are "transparent" if nothing has changed. So, even Mach 3 is 1020 meters per second, that is, in one intermediate frame of such a camera, the rocket will fly even at a speed of Mach 3 - 68 meters. Statistically, it's probably more likely to wake up gutted by aliens than to catch this missile in a security camera frame, even a good one, with 15fps from keyframes, even if it will limp and fly at half speed.
    6. +1
      7 November 2022 17: 08
      Quote: Santa Fe
      Naturally, no evidence of this was given.

      Whenever you hear this on-duty phrase, immediately open a search on the Internet.

      In the age of smartphones and video cameras installed everywhere, it is impossible to hide the fact of using the Kh-22/32, a rocket with outstanding dimensions and a monumental appearance


      Here it was a pure accident. The legitimate target was a military plant in Kremenchuk, located literally behind the shopping center

      Why did the rocket choose the shopping center instead? Everything becomes clear if you remember the purpose of the X-22/32. The homing head of an anti-ship missile selects the largest contrast target. In the same way, when operating against ground targets, the GOS "captures" the largest, standing separately buildings. Soviet designers rightly believed that this would allow the GOS to find and effectively hit the buildings of factory workshops. In Soviet times, it was not yet known that in the future huge shopping centers the size of a factory would appear in cities.

      Here is such a story, if we speak without lies and attempts to embellish it, hide it, or, on the contrary, “inflate” the sensation

      And here is what they write on the Khokhlyatsky website: “It is reported that the first rocket hit the territory of the plant, the second - at Amstor. Windows were shattered in most of the premises of Kredmash due to the impact.
      So your version of a rotten egg is not worth it, because the Ukrainians themselves confirmed that the missile hit the right place. And the fire in the shopping center was dragged in for the hype.
  4. 0
    7 November 2022 06: 10
    Even the most perfect tool will be ineffective in the absence of skillful hands and an intelligent head. Well, if there are any, everything that is available will go into business.
  5. 0
    7 November 2022 06: 21
    It's all good, of course, missiles, etc. But at the front, Tu22s are needed in the version with a full bomb load of fabs and odabs, this is fundamentally capable of solving many problems for our guys at the front. And the men will thank you good
    1. 0
      14 November 2022 22: 47
      This is pure suicide for the bombers. Ukrainian air defense is alive and well, unfortunately. This is not Syria.
      Attacks can only be done with missiles.
      1. -1
        15 November 2022 01: 11
        Yeah. Tell it to mopeds, calibers and others that they have thinned out the Khokhlyatsky infrastructure so well in recent months. Plus, there are a lot of ways to avoid the loss of aviation, there would be a desire. And Syria has nothing to do with everything
  6. +6
    7 November 2022 06: 23
    RIA Novosti, citing an unnamed informed source. The latter confirmed that long-range aviation uses Kh-32 missiles

    OBS source? There is no evidence for the use of the X-32. especially considering the fact that a huge number of old X-22s have been accumulated in warehouses since the times of the USSR.
  7. +2
    7 November 2022 06: 26
    The very thing is for the destruction of power plants in western and central Ukraine. You can also dispose of the old X22.
    1. -2
      7 November 2022 11: 06
      Quote: Bodypuncher
      You can also dispose of the old X22.

      And tomorrow it will suddenly become necessary to destroy the enemy AUG, and it will suddenly turn out that there is nothing to do this with - the most suitable missiles for this have been fired at village substations.
      1. 0
        7 November 2022 12: 12
        For AUG X32, for the energy system of Bandera X22, of which there are hundreds if not thousands in warehouses. For traction substations along the piece of iron there is Geranium. For rural substation Lancet. The range is good now.
        1. +1
          13 November 2022 18: 12
          The Lancet has a different purpose and its cost is high (due to the TV GOS), so you should not consider it a cheap version of Geranium.
  8. +11
    7 November 2022 07: 40
    Unfortunately, publications "about nothing" like this one began to come across too often on VO. negative
  9. 0
    7 November 2022 08: 26
    I believe that the shortcomings of the X-22 are somewhat exaggerated by the author.
    The racket is quite a combat one, capable of solving the whole range of urgent tasks.
    And intercepting it is also not easy (practically impossible) by military air defense systems, like the X-32.
    The beauty of this product is that, being quite old (how old is 30 years old?) It is, without any exaggeration, a modern model of weapons.
  10. +4
    7 November 2022 08: 49
    The main disadvantages of the old X-22 are associated with the obsolescence of the radar homing head.
    The main drawback is related to the complexity of operation, in particular, with its VERY and VERY dangerous and long refueling... Did the new fuel remain the same or was it replaced, and was the refueling process simplified?
    1. +5
      7 November 2022 13: 25
      Quote: svp67
      The new fuel remained the same or was replaced, and the refueling process was simplified

      Fuel and oxidizer are the same infernal explosive and toxic mixture. According to some reports, due to ampulization, X-32 can be stored for a long time in a refilled form. But the information about the use of these missiles in Ukraine most likely does not correspond to reality. Accuracy when using INS will not be higher than that of the X-22.
    2. +4
      7 November 2022 14: 43
      The author was too lazy or did not want to focus on the extreme toxicity and danger of the Kh-22 propellant components.
      But what about the X-32? Surely the same hellish cocktail invented by the Germans in World War II. Well, not a kerosene-oxygen engine, as on space rockets wassat
      1. +1
        8 November 2022 06: 53
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        The author was too lazy or did not want to focus on the extreme toxicity and danger of the Kh-22 propellant components.

        The author probably doesn't know this. No.
  11. -1
    7 November 2022 09: 34
    All anti-ship missiles in the world are universal systems.
    It's just that the X-32 is an order of magnitude, if not 2 orders of magnitude more expensive than the caliber (not in the anti-ship missile modification).
    It is one thing to fly according to coordinates (checking with the inertial system and GPS / GLONASS) at subsonic speeds, and it is quite another to fly at a speed of Mach 3-5, be able to fly in a swarm, make anti-aircraft maneuvers, change targets in the process, if the previous one is destroyed, search and correct yourself trajectory, taking into account the movement of enemy targets. And also anti-ship missiles are always better protected from enemy electronic warfare.
    And so any anti-ship missiles in the world can hit ground-based radio-contrast targets.
    1. -1
      8 November 2022 13: 42
      fly at a speed of Mach 3-5, be able to fly in a swarm, make anti-aircraft maneuvers, change targets in the process
      Wow wow wow, good, comrade, drink some water, this is not such a cool rocket. Even though it's good
      1. 0
        8 November 2022 16: 28
        A swarm of old granites were able to fly, but I'm not talking about a specific one. In general, those signs by which PKR differ from missiles designed to hit stationary targets.
        1. 0
          9 November 2022 09: 52
          I can only send to study materiel.

          PS I also have this button, if anything.
  12. -1
    7 November 2022 09: 42
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    They write that three rockets were suspended only for transportation.

    on the fence, too, WRITE.
  13. 0
    7 November 2022 10: 43
    can hit both enemy ships and surface targets.
    Correct to "ground".
  14. +3
    7 November 2022 12: 00
    The author, well, where did you get that X32 is used in Ukraine? Give an example of one real use of this rocket, confirmed not by blood-screams, but by normal sources.
  15. 0
    7 November 2022 17: 48
    The main disadvantages of the old X-22 are associated with the obsolescence of the radar homing head. For the Kh-32, a new active-passive seeker of this type was developed.

    The simplest and cheapest solution is to install a new head on an old rocket.
  16. +2
    7 November 2022 21: 30
    Explain to me if there is a submarine-surface-land-in India aviation .... Onyx ...... Why do we need the X-32?
    1. -2
      8 November 2022 10: 18
      The developers also want to eat, and their bosses want a villa in Montenegro, a small yacht, a country house in their homeland by the river with a bathhouse, apartments for children and Tesla. To each!
      In the state of a healthy person, the analytical department of the Air Force would have long ago noticed that it is better to hang not 22 huge, heavy ones (well, yes, because we carry an oxidizer with us, and we don’t take oxygen from the atmosphere), very noticeable on the radar of the X-3 missiles, and 32 small, nimble, inconspicuous multi-purpose missiles capable of operating in a swarm and overloading enemy air defenses during a mass launch.
      In the state of the smoker, who needs to be greased, knocked out an order for the modernization of obsolete weapons, cut the loot, reported on the increase in accuracy (no wonder if you throw the calculator on transistors out of the rocket and insert the ZX Spectrum), screwed new stars, filmed a video on the Zvezda TV channel .
    2. +1
      8 November 2022 13: 46
      what A strange question, the goals are different, the ammunition load, the range. Yes, even the sizes are different.
      1. 0
        8 November 2022 15: 31
        The goals are the same - anti-ship missiles to defeat the AUG ...... Onyx has a range for ground launch .. from the Air will be 2 times more.
        1. 0
          9 November 2022 09: 50
          I propose to study the materiel.


          Sorry, I'm not smart enough to write a normal comment.
          1. -1
            9 November 2022 13: 10
            I studied ...... Both are anti-ship missiles, the schemes are fundamentally different, the range plus or minus is similar, the warhead plus or minus is similar.
            Now the question is: Onyx - land - ship. The rocket is massive. serial ...... X32 - piece, its carrier is not produced .... there are no other carriers. If approached sensibly, I would switch to ONIX-M (conditional).
            1. +1
              9 November 2022 15: 21
              Ohh, they are all different. Up to the principle of achieving the goal. Onyx soars to a height of 15 km at a speed of 3 m, turns on the radar, captures the target, then "glides" to a height of tens of meters at a speed of 2 m. Destruction range up to 300 km maximum. (actual less). Its ceiling is about 20 km. Weight warhead 300.

              X32 - Range up to 1000 km, speed up to Mach 4.5 (almost twice as high), ceiling 40 km (twice as high and 20% higher than that of the coolest UWB air defense), warhead 500.

              So the question of using onyx instead of x is how to use bast shoes instead of warm boots. Yes, and onyx adapted for air launch. A x developed by for air launch.
              1. 0
                9 November 2022 16: 25
                Principle and trajectory - Yes, but no less important is the probability of hitting a target ... So even before sound CDs are very dangerous for ships. Serialization is important for the Kyrgyz Republic (as the Ukroconflict shows) ... its cost and the ability to produce a lot.
                Oniks-M has a range of up to 800 km from the ground, with Tu22M3 it will be 1,5 times more.
                1. 0
                  9 November 2022 16: 35
                  You are either trolling or one of the two. I'm out of this br.. debate
                  1. -1
                    9 November 2022 16: 43
                    Well, learning is light, not scientists are darkness. I support.
    3. 0
      13 December 2022 01: 00
      Ship-based is different from aviation. Less weight restrictions. Need a booster to get started. Corrosion resistance. Less heat restrictions and overloads. Etc.
  17. 0
    8 November 2022 16: 27
    My wish....
    The rocket is expensive. And just to hit on insignificant objects is not reasonable.
    The blow must be applied to Bankovskaya. And during or near the "events" on it.
    So it will be clearer.
    Everyone!!!!
    1. 0
      9 November 2022 15: 43
      What military value does your address have?
  18. +1
    9 November 2022 03: 32
    Under the START-3 Treaty, Russia and the United States undertake to have no more than 1550 nuclear warheads and no more than 800 deployed and non-deployed delivery vehicles. Whereas the number of tactical nuclear charges, according to unofficial information, can be up to 5 thousand for each side. These are nuclear charges for large-caliber artillery, operational-tactical missiles and nuclear bombs for front-line aviation.


    As of 2021, there are approximately 150 B61 nuclear bombs deployed at six bases in five countries - Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey.

    The main problem of Russia is the insufficient number of carriers for tactical nuclear weapons.
    The United States and NATO alone have about 7 thousand winged "Tomohawks" that can be modified for tactical nuclear warheads, and in addition to them, there are many times more aircraft capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons than Russia.
    Russia should have several hundred modified X-32s with nuclear warheads in constant combat readiness for use both on AUGs and on ground targets.
    It is not yet known when hypersonic Zircons with a similar range will be produced in hundreds of pieces to equip aviation, navy and coastal units with a sufficient number of missiles with nuclear and conventional warheads, and subsonic Calibers are a fairly easy target for the enemy air force and air defense.
    1. +1
      9 November 2022 15: 44
      X32 does not need to be modified, it is a carrier "out of the box", it is enough to equip it. But the fact that thousands of them are needed, I cannot but agree with this. But no less needed are the carriers of these missiles, modern ones.
    2. +1
      11 December 2022 17: 57
      There are people who see conspiracies everywhere and who are ready to rattle nuclear warheads wherever possible. Were you not taught in school that there would be no winners in a nuclear war? Watch the 1981 or '82 movie "The Day After" (not to be confused with "The day after tomorrow"). Everything is shown clearly and concisely.
  19. 0
    13 November 2022 11: 33
    First combat use...
    X-32, "Dagger", etc. And judging by the activity, the last application. No more. All the steam went to the whistle. Yes, and pulnuli somewhere far away in the steppe.
    In Kyiv, they did not even notice. They continue to arrange banquets in honor of dear guests.
    The other day, ours, 10 hours, continuously, from "all" types of available weapons, hollowed out the "group" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. As many as 10 tanks were knocked out and a dozen banderlogs (one per tank).
    The author, in this "battle" by chance, did you try to use the X-32?
  20. 0
    11 December 2022 17: 52
    Three missiles were never taken on combat sorties, because. there are restrictions on the maximum takeoff weight. They tried IN THEORY that it is possible to hang the middle one in a semi-recessed state. Even in the photo under the left plane, ordinary air bombs hang
  21. 0
    7 January 2023 02: 00
    The article is about nothing.
    The same general phrases that are constantly repeated and shuffled.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"