Deputy Ambassador of China to the UN criticized the rejection of the resolution on US biolaboratories in Ukraine

40
Deputy Ambassador of China to the UN criticized the rejection of the resolution on US biolaboratories in Ukraine

Russia proposed in the UN Security Council to start proceedings on violations by the Kyiv regime and the United States of the Convention on Biological weaponsbut her offer was blocked. Chinese Deputy Representative to the UN Geng Shuang expressed his country's position on this issue. He said that the Security Council should not have rejected the resolution of the Russian Federation on the US biolaboratories in Ukraine.

Shuang noted that for eight months now Moscow has been signaling to the international community about the military biological experiments of the Pentagon on Ukrainian territory, but the UN does not react to these signals. On this occasion, the leadership of the PRC expresses its deep concern.



Russia filed a complaint with the Security Council and requested that an investigation be launched. It's justified, legitimate and shouldn't have been blocked

- the diplomat noted.

The representative of the Chinese delegation said that the evidence provided by Russia of violations of international law needs a thorough investigation and cannot be ignored.

Unfortunately, a number of questions posed by Russia remained without exhaustive answers.

- notes the Deputy Permanent Representative of the People's Republic of China.

When voting in the UN Security Council for Russia's resolution on American biological laboratories in Ukraine, it was supported, apart from the Russian Federation itself, only by China. Washington, Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    3 November 2022 09: 25
    Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.
    They didn’t refrain, they just didn’t dare ..
    1. ZoV
      +7
      3 November 2022 09: 40
      Quote: kor1vet1974
      They didn’t refrain, they just didn’t dare ..

      And to be more precise, they were frightened, watching how Russia was being poisoned and surrounded by these biolabs along the entire border, in fact ..
      1. +10
        3 November 2022 10: 03
        When voting in the UN Security Council for Russia's resolution on American biological laboratories in Ukraine, it was supported, apart from the Russian Federation itself, only by China. Washington, Paris and London voted against the rest abstained.

        Remarkably, that those very main WWII arsonists behind Germany and Poland voted AGAINST!
        And now here voted AGAINST they are the same - the main incendiaries of both WWII and TMV, standing again behind the backs of Germany and Poland!

        It is known that the Anglo-Saxons are the same countries; The USA, Great Britain and even France - GENERALLY did not want to hold ANY trial of the leaders and war criminals of the Third Reich in 1945.
        It was the USSR, led by Stalin, who insisted on holding a tribunal in Nuremberg over the Nazis in 1945.
      2. +4
        3 November 2022 10: 29
        ...... the UN does not react to these signals in any way.

        The UN has become more like a humanitarian organization with limited powers.
        1. +4
          3 November 2022 10: 39
          Quote: 4ekist
          The UN has become more like a humanitarian organization with limited powers.

          That's for sure, they send "humanitarian aid" to Ukraine, they import bread into "poor" Europe when the poorest population of the planet is dying of hunger. And everything is either under the auspices of the UN, or they do not want to see anything. Everything is coming to the same end as the League of Nations.
          1. +2
            3 November 2022 11: 11
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Quote: 4ekist
            The UN has become more like a humanitarian organization with limited powers.
            That's for sure, they send "humanitarian aid" to Ukraine, they import bread into "poor" Europe when the poorest population of the planet is dying of hunger. And everything is either under the auspices of the UN, or they do not want to see anything. Everything is coming to the same end as the League of Nations.

            Alas, shortly after WWII, Stalin drew attention to this and already spoke about this in 1951!

            1. +2
              3 November 2022 12: 01
              Quote: Tatiana
              Alas, shortly after WWII, Stalin drew attention to this and already spoke about this in 1951!

              And so for the next 70 years, after the words of I.V. Stalin. Was wise.
      3. 0
        4 November 2022 15: 09
        It's time to disperse this UN ... Well, or move closer to the countries of equatorial Africa. You look, and intelligence, humanity and compassion will be added in decisions .. hi
    2. 0
      3 November 2022 10: 07
      Quote: kor1vet1974
      Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.
      They didn’t refrain, they just didn’t dare ..

      When voting in the UN Security Council for Russia's resolution on American biological laboratories in Ukraine, it was supported, apart from the Russian Federation itself, only by China. Washington, Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.

      Still, to live and work in the States, being listed in the UN, to receive money on the spot and probably a lot ... So why refuse, suddenly the owners will drive home ...
  2. +10
    3 November 2022 09: 25
    The US will not launch an investigation into Ukraine under any circumstances, otherwise the facts about China with Covid will be revealed.
    1. +6
      3 November 2022 10: 03
      Quote: ximkim
      These laboratories are very expensive for a number of countries, respectively, no one will vote against himself.

      Is it just for Covid? And all sorts of animals "sores", as a result of which hundreds of thousands of heads around the world were slaughtered, destroyed? There was nothing, and suddenly, one infection on cattle, then another ... They fell from the sky?!
  3. +3
    3 November 2022 09: 28
    These laboratories are very expensive for a number of countries, respectively, no one will vote against himself.
    1. +1
      3 November 2022 11: 06
      Quote: ximkim
      These labs are very priced for a number of countries

      and not as laboratories, but because they pay for it. And for sure the people of these countries do not get this money. Therefore, it was not the countries that abstained, but a bunch of smeared officials.
  4. +7
    3 November 2022 09: 30
    Rejected, abstained...? Now wait for the next pandemic ... neither Ebola nor Corona, the same AIDS taught anything ... blame yourself ...
    1. +3
      3 November 2022 09: 49
      It reminds me of the phrase written by Shakespeare,
      a plague on both your houses
    2. +2
      3 November 2022 10: 26
      In the UK, a mysterious disease is turning pigeons into twisted-necked zombies. Birds lose their ability to fly and begin to zigzag. This is reported by the Daily Mirror.

      In poor birds, tremors and an almost complete lack of appetite are also observed, which is why they are rapidly losing weight.

      The virus that infects birds has already been studied by scientists. It's called Newcastle disease, and it's a highly contagious disease. Because of it, according to the sad forecasts of experts, almost all birds in the UK may die.
      1. 0
        4 November 2022 15: 31
        this "mysterious" disease has been known for 100 years.
        And there has never been a mass extinction of birds because of this.
        These British "scientists" have long been known for their "inventions and forecasts"
        The exception is slovenliness on closed farms, such as poultry farms, yes, if you lose control, all birds can die, since, frankly, the conditions for the spread of this virus are almost ideal there. Heat, light, dirt, heaps of chickens together. But in a normal factory, where cleanliness is monitored, mass deaths simply will not be allowed.
  5. +3
    3 November 2022 09: 33
    it was supported, except for the Russian Federation itself, only China. Washington, Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.

    This was to be expected. Washington, Paris and London. Here they are, my dears, who worked in those laboratories. The rest, pressing their ears, are waiting to see who will win. 1. In the US elections, 2 In conflict with Ukraine. But how the Russian Federation will win - they will all zealously rush to conduct an investigation!
    1. ZoV
      +1
      3 November 2022 09: 42
      Quote: Egoza
      But how the Russian Federation will win - they will all zealously rush to conduct an investigation!

      And interrupting each other to yell that they have always been for Russia and pluck a dead eagle
    2. +3
      3 November 2022 09: 47
      hi Found by our documents that they would provide. No one is interested in this, especially the arrogant people, who have been procrastinating on the topic of violins for more than a year, without providing anything at all. In general, these countries so diligently do not want to talk about biological weapons, Elena, that it is clear ---- the number of laboratories around the Russian Federation is becoming more and more
  6. +3
    3 November 2022 09: 43
    The representative of the Chinese delegation said that the evidence provided by Russia of violations of international law needs a thorough investigation and cannot be ignored.
    . The question is that "scientists" in uniforms can, MAY, play god and ... maybe they will fly to everyone, no matter whose friends you go to.
    Hoping that they will give you a magic pill / vaccine / antidote, be sure ... blessed are those who believe!
  7. +2
    3 November 2022 09: 47
    When voting in the UN Security Council for Russia's resolution on American biological laboratories in Ukraine, it was supported, apart from the Russian Federation itself, only by China. Washington, Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.

    Very interesting. The UN Security Council itself is the listed five permanent and ten elective countries. Two for and three against. It is necessary to take away the right to vote from London because it is a branch of the United States (although the British themselves think the opposite). And ten electives, it turns out that the United States sent to Peru along an erotic route
  8. +6
    3 November 2022 09: 47
    .China. Washington, Paris and London voted against, the rest abstained.

    Forgive me Lord, the plague is on their head.... feel
    1. +2
      3 November 2022 10: 06
      Quote: Russia
      Forgive me Lord, the plague is on their head....

      Not well, China then voted against, although it always abstained. It turns out that this trinity got the same Celestial Empire
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        3 November 2022 10: 43
        Call China! so highlighted, so inserted ... did not check .... feel
        1. +1
          3 November 2022 11: 03
          Not well. In general, you are right about the other three about the plague
  9. +4
    3 November 2022 09: 49
    It is necessary to ask insolently for Covid.
    1. +2
      3 November 2022 10: 31
      It is necessary to ask insolently for Covid.

      If you start asking them for everything, then you may not reach covid.
      1. +1
        3 November 2022 10: 38
        Quote from: laws70
        It is necessary to ask insolently for Covid.

        If you start asking them for everything, then you may not reach covid.

        It's true. They owe a lot and a lot.
  10. +2
    3 November 2022 10: 18
    It's justified, legitimate and shouldn't have been blocked
    It should not have been from the point of view of morality, but not American. And in the UN and its Security Council, unfortunately, the American view of what is happening in the world dominates, while the United States itself, as usual, is beyond criticism. In this case, even the Chinese supported the Russian initiative, and did not abstain, as happens watching from the outside how it ends.
    1. +1
      3 November 2022 10: 29
      It should not have been from the point of view of morality, but not American.

      Their morality is a complete lack of morality, from the point of view we are accustomed to.
    2. GIS
      0
      3 November 2022 12: 18
      because they tried and are trying to make the Chinese extreme in terms of covid.
      and whoever ends up paying
  11. Two
    +2
    3 November 2022 10: 33
    hi It is necessary to create a joint Russian-Chinese group and move on. I think the Chinese would support this proposal of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
    1. +1
      3 November 2022 13: 44
      That's right ...

      No one forbids the two permanent members of the UN Security Council, Russia and China, to create their own international group. And to conduct our own, detailed and wide, international investigation of these criminal intentions and actions of the USS to develop biological weapons ...
  12. +1
    3 November 2022 11: 01
    Iniquity. The veto of these countries only confirmed that they are indifferent to the fate of their own people. For them, their own power is more important. If we refuse to distribute bio-weapons, then we show cowardice, thereby confirming that the people are also on the side of our elites.
  13. 0
    3 November 2022 11: 20
    Quote: Azim77
    Quote: ximkim
    These labs are very priced for a number of countries

    and not as laboratories, but because they pay for it. And for sure the people of these countries do not get this money. Therefore, it was not the countries that abstained, but a bunch of smeared officials.

    Almost so. Every leader is a person.
  14. 0
    3 November 2022 11: 50
    The UN has long been itself in a test tube, which, of its own accord, is filled by an overseas uncle in star-striped underpants!
  15. 0
    3 November 2022 12: 08
    We need to get out of all these contracts. They all don't work. We are addicted.
  16. 0
    3 November 2022 14: 32
    The UN Institute has, of course, completely discredited itself, but so far there is nothing better.
    1. 0
      3 November 2022 16: 37
      - When will it be better?
      - It was better already!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"