US blocked Russia's resolution on the creation of a commission to investigate the activities of American biological laboratories in Ukraine

At the initiative of Russia, the UN Security Council considered a resolution on the need to create a special commission to investigate the activities of American biological laboratories on the territory of Ukraine. Recall that earlier the Russian Ministry of Defense presented numerous facts of the activities of American laboratories in Ukraine in the interests of the Pentagon. At the same time, among the evidence of the activities of these facilities for military purposes, documents (including funding) from the US Department of Defense were presented.

Very “original” studies were carried out in American laboratories near the borders of Russia, including the study of the possibility of transferring viruses and other pathogens by migratory birds, whose migration routes pass through the territory of our country. Variants of the spread of the coronavirus in bats were identified, which gives an additional reason to talk about the high probability of the emergence of a new coronavirus precisely by artificial means and precisely in one of the US biological laboratories.

In addition to Russia, China voted for the resolution presented, nine countries (non-permanent members of the UN Security Council) decided to abstain, and the NATO trio - the United States, Britain and France blocked the resolution.

The resolution provided for the creation of such a commission, which would include specialized specialists from all states that are members of the Security Council. The results could be presented at a conference of countries that have signed the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological weapons.

The vote by the US and its satellites blocking the resolution clearly shows that there is something to hide. And Washington, of course, is not interested in spreading the truth about the activities of US biolaboratories on the territories of the same Ukraine, not for the purposes of peace and humanism.

Comments

[Or me]

In addition to Russia, China voted for the resolution submitted, nine countries (non-permanent members of the UN Security Council) decided to abstain, and the NATO trio - the United States, Britain and France blocked the resolution.

Nothing unexpected. Everything is natural) from the positions of amers, and their satellites.

[Uncle lee]

clearly shows that there is something to hide

Snout something in the gun!

[laws70]

Snout something in the gun!

Britons and French too

[Plate]

No, there is something unexpected: Chinese support. Prior to this, the Chinese usually abstained from voting on such resolutions.

[seregatara1969]

The Chinese have been badly poisoned by the latest viruses, so they vote actively

[Plate]

Fewer Chinese died than Americans.

[Lech from Android.]

US blocked Russia's resolution

What a surprise.
For the first time or something.
Russia has no levers of pressure on the UN secretariat... but the United States does... so let's continue in the same spirit.

[Ovsigovets]

in the UN Security Council, you can wipe yourself off as a secretary, he is nothing more than a talking head

[YOUR]

And pressure on the UN secretariat. The United States has the right to veto and actively uses it in its favor.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Right.
And both China and Russia have the right to veto, and when necessary they use it.

[Collins]

The UN must cease to exist

[Dilettante grandfather]

The UN must cease to exist

The UN must exist. As a platform for the exchange of opinions. Another issue is that the structure needs to be reformed.

[Plate]

The League of Nations also "should" cease to exist. Well, she stopped. No need to repeat mistakes. As Grandfather the amateur noted above, reform is needed, not a complete disbandment.

[Ovsigovets]

so why are we stupid ...... disperse this smelly topic ..... blame all mortal sins

[Knell wardenheart]

The vote of the US and its satellites blocking the resolution clearly shows that there is something to hide

Well, it testifies, so what? We now have some kind of twofold position - on the one hand, we are a member of the UN Security Council and with all the pincers for this organization, which is already frankly ineffective, slipping and bought by the United States with giblets. On the other hand, we are shaking the earth like this - in front of whom we ask, we are shaking it? In front of the second half of the UN Security Council, which understands everything but at the same time adheres to the "American line of truth" because a retreat would mean the collapse of their welfare model and the architecture that is beneficial to them? Or maybe in front of an inexpressive mass of other UN member states that sit tightly on a Western product, a product of this very "welfare model"?

What do we want? Again, rest your nose against the wall of fact - most were bought and not bought by us.

[Al manah]

Oh really?! It can't be...
The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information.

[Igor K]

And what prevents the creation of an independent group somehow "calling" it.
It will be an ideologically breakthrough theme under the slogan for example: "Let's unite to save the world" or something like that.
As an option "a group of doctors of the world."

[Rustic]

It will be an ideologically breakthrough theme under the slogan for example: "Let's unite to save the world" or something like that.

You will not believe it, but the very first rescuers of the world will be ghouls-crap fsh.

[Magellan]

The hat is on the thief.
Wow, as many as 9 abstained

[Rustic]

The world is slowly beginning to fence itself off from Anglo-Saxon fascism.

[FoBoss_VM]

Who would doubt them

[tolmachiev51]

What do you want !? The UN has long been the office of the Pentagon - otherwise, the purest water is boltology, that is, the firm "horns and hooves."

[rotmistr60]

There was no doubt that the Russian resolution would be blocked. As well as about the fact that it will be supported by the permanent members of the UN Security Council, they are also satellites of the United States. The statement or suspicions against the United States about their criminal activities abroad is tantamount to a self-imposed sentence. The Russian side stated that it would continue the investigation into the American biolaboratories in Ukraine on its own and the results would be made internationally public. So far, alas, the Americans at the international level will not be firmly hooked and will not wait for a general condemnation of their activities.

[Vlvl]

But no one now prevents the creation of a commission under another international organization. For example, the Health Organization or the CSTO, BRICS, etc.

[Two]

We need to push the topic further! Bring the issue to the session of the UN General Assembly and break through a public vote!

[Dedok]

Quote: Dos

Bring the issue to the session of the UN General Assembly and break through a public vote!

and you-did a preliminary analysis of the vote? - at best - 25% will vote for us ...

[Two]

For that it will be clear to whom to send the wheat!

[AIK05]

The UN is a dummy, an amorphous organization, a cover for amers in black deeds.

[digger]

If Russia created a biological laboratory on the border of Mexico and the United States, what would be the reaction of the Americans?

[APASUS]

Who would have thought that the Americans do not want an investigation, the use of bioweapons. I don’t understand what ours were counting on?

[Dedok]

Quote: APASUS

What did we expect, I don’t understand?

it's time to raise it to the vote: thus. recall the problem...

[nikniknik]

Yes, this is not a UN security council, but a gathering at the "collective farm yard". They came and chatted and parted ways.

[iouris]

Has Russia already been stripped of its permanent membership in the UN Security Council?