Military Review

US blocked Russia's resolution on the creation of a commission to investigate the activities of American biological laboratories in Ukraine

33
US blocked Russia's resolution on the creation of a commission to investigate the activities of American biological laboratories in Ukraine

At the initiative of Russia, the UN Security Council considered a resolution on the need to create a special commission to investigate the activities of American biological laboratories on the territory of Ukraine. Recall that earlier the Russian Ministry of Defense presented numerous facts of the activities of American laboratories in Ukraine in the interests of the Pentagon. At the same time, among the evidence of the activities of these facilities for military purposes, documents (including funding) from the US Department of Defense were presented.


Very “original” studies were carried out in American laboratories near the borders of Russia, including the study of the possibility of transferring viruses and other pathogens by migratory birds, whose migration routes pass through the territory of our country. Variants of the spread of the coronavirus in bats were identified, which gives an additional reason to talk about the high probability of the emergence of a new coronavirus precisely by artificial means and precisely in one of the US biological laboratories.

In addition to Russia, China voted for the resolution presented, nine countries (non-permanent members of the UN Security Council) decided to abstain, and the NATO trio - the United States, Britain and France blocked the resolution.

The resolution provided for the creation of such a commission, which would include specialized specialists from all states that are members of the Security Council. The results could be presented at a conference of countries that have signed the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological weapons.

The vote by the US and its satellites blocking the resolution clearly shows that there is something to hide. And Washington, of course, is not interested in spreading the truth about the activities of US biolaboratories on the territories of the same Ukraine, not for the purposes of peace and humanism.
33 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Or me
    Or me 3 November 2022 01: 22
    +7
    In addition to Russia, China voted for the resolution submitted, nine countries (non-permanent members of the UN Security Council) decided to abstain, and the NATO trio - the United States, Britain and France blocked the resolution.
    Nothing unexpected. Everything is natural) from the positions of amers, and their satellites.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 3 November 2022 01: 25
      +4
      clearly shows that there is something to hide
      Snout something in the gun!
      1. laws70
        laws70 3 November 2022 07: 50
        +3
        Snout something in the gun!

        Britons and French too
    2. Plate
      Plate 3 November 2022 08: 21
      0
      No, there is something unexpected: Chinese support. Prior to this, the Chinese usually abstained from voting on such resolutions.
      1. seregatara1969
        seregatara1969 3 November 2022 09: 03
        +1
        The Chinese have been badly poisoned by the latest viruses, so they vote actively
        1. Plate
          Plate 3 November 2022 09: 38
          +1
          Fewer Chinese died than Americans.
  2. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 3 November 2022 01: 33
    +1
    US blocked Russia's resolution

    What a surprise. smile
    For the first time or something.
    Russia has no levers of pressure on the UN secretariat... but the United States does... so let's continue in the same spirit.
    1. Ovsigovets
      Ovsigovets 3 November 2022 01: 37
      +1
      in the UN Security Council, you can wipe yourself off as a secretary, he is nothing more than a talking head
    2. YOUR
      YOUR 3 November 2022 02: 10
      +3
      And pressure on the UN secretariat. The United States has the right to veto and actively uses it in its favor.
      1. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 3 November 2022 04: 18
        +5
        Right.
        And both China and Russia have the right to veto, and when necessary they use it.
  3. Collins
    Collins 3 November 2022 01: 36
    -3
    The UN must cease to exist
    1. Dilettante grandfather
      Dilettante grandfather 3 November 2022 04: 33
      +2
      The UN must cease to exist

      The UN must exist. As a platform for the exchange of opinions. Another issue is that the structure needs to be reformed.
    2. Plate
      Plate 3 November 2022 08: 22
      0
      The League of Nations also "should" cease to exist. Well, she stopped. No need to repeat mistakes. As Grandfather the amateur noted above, reform is needed, not a complete disbandment.
  4. Ovsigovets
    Ovsigovets 3 November 2022 01: 36
    +6
    so why are we stupid ...... disperse this smelly topic ..... blame all mortal sins
  5. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 3 November 2022 02: 11
    +3
    The vote of the US and its satellites blocking the resolution clearly shows that there is something to hide

    Well, it testifies, so what? We now have some kind of twofold position - on the one hand, we are a member of the UN Security Council and with all the pincers for this organization, which is already frankly ineffective, slipping and bought by the United States with giblets. On the other hand, we are shaking the earth like this - in front of whom we ask, we are shaking it? In front of the second half of the UN Security Council, which understands everything but at the same time adheres to the "American line of truth" because a retreat would mean the collapse of their welfare model and the architecture that is beneficial to them? Or maybe in front of an inexpressive mass of other UN member states that sit tightly on a Western product, a product of this very "welfare model"?

    What do we want? Again, rest your nose against the wall of fact - most were bought and not bought by us.
  6. Al manah
    Al manah 3 November 2022 02: 13
    -4
    Oh really?! It can't be... wink
    The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information.
  7. Igor K
    Igor K 3 November 2022 02: 18
    +2
    And what prevents the creation of an independent group somehow "calling" it.
    It will be an ideologically breakthrough theme under the slogan for example: "Let's unite to save the world" or something like that.
    As an option "a group of doctors of the world."
    1. Rustic
      Rustic 3 November 2022 02: 54
      0
      It will be an ideologically breakthrough theme under the slogan for example: "Let's unite to save the world" or something like that.
      You will not believe it, but the very first rescuers of the world will be ghouls-crap fsh.
  8. Magellan
    Magellan 3 November 2022 02: 43
    +1
    The hat is on the thief.
    Wow, as many as 9 abstained
    1. Rustic
      Rustic 3 November 2022 02: 56
      -1
      The world is slowly beginning to fence itself off from Anglo-Saxon fascism.
  9. FoBoss_VM
    FoBoss_VM 3 November 2022 03: 30
    -3
    Who would doubt them
  10. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 3 November 2022 03: 45
    0
    What do you want !? The UN has long been the office of the Pentagon - otherwise, the purest water is boltology, that is, the firm "horns and hooves."
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 November 2022 06: 20
    0
    There was no doubt that the Russian resolution would be blocked. As well as about the fact that it will be supported by the permanent members of the UN Security Council, they are also satellites of the United States. The statement or suspicions against the United States about their criminal activities abroad is tantamount to a self-imposed sentence. The Russian side stated that it would continue the investigation into the American biolaboratories in Ukraine on its own and the results would be made internationally public. So far, alas, the Americans at the international level will not be firmly hooked and will not wait for a general condemnation of their activities.
  12. Vlvl
    Vlvl 3 November 2022 07: 00
    +1
    But no one now prevents the creation of a commission under another international organization. For example, the Health Organization or the CSTO, BRICS, etc.
  13. Two
    Two 3 November 2022 07: 03
    0
    hi We need to push the topic further! Bring the issue to the session of the UN General Assembly and break through a public vote!
    1. Dedok
      Dedok 3 November 2022 08: 08
      0
      Quote: Dos
      Bring the issue to the session of the UN General Assembly and break through a public vote!


      and you-did a preliminary analysis of the vote? - at best - 25% will vote for us ...
      1. Two
        Two 3 November 2022 08: 50
        0
        hi For that it will be clear to whom to send the wheat!
  14. AIK05
    AIK05 3 November 2022 07: 57
    0
    The UN is a dummy, an amorphous organization, a cover for amers in black deeds.
  15. digger
    digger 3 November 2022 08: 09
    +1
    If Russia created a biological laboratory on the border of Mexico and the United States, what would be the reaction of the Americans?
  16. APASUS
    APASUS 3 November 2022 08: 45
    0
    Who would have thought that the Americans do not want an investigation, the use of bioweapons. I don’t understand what ours were counting on?
    1. Dedok
      Dedok 3 November 2022 10: 58
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      What did we expect, I don’t understand?

      it's time to raise it to the vote: thus. recall the problem...
  17. nikniknik
    nikniknik 3 November 2022 10: 15
    +1
    Yes, this is not a UN security council, but a gathering at the "collective farm yard". They came and chatted and parted ways.
  18. iouris
    iouris 3 November 2022 11: 43
    0
    Has Russia already been stripped of its permanent membership in the UN Security Council?