Military Review

Bookmark armored "Gyurza-M" for the Ukrainian Navy

43

October 25 2012 of the year OJSC “Plant“ Leninskaya Kuznitsa ”in Kiev held the laying of the first two small armored artillery boats of the 58155 (Gyurza-M) project intended for the Ukrainian Navy. Boats are planned for use in solving problems in the Danube River basin and in the coastal zone of the Black and Azov Seas. According to the press service of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, up to 2017, it is planned to build nine boats of the Gyurza-M type for the Ukrainian Navy. However, during the ceremony of laying down the first two units of 25 in October, First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine Oleksandr Oleinik noted that the number of boats built "will depend on funding."


The 58155 project armored vehicle (“Gyurza-M”) was developed by the Ukrainian enterprise “State Research and Design Center for Shipbuilding” (Nikolaev) and is a further development of the 58150 (“Gyurza”) design boats, two units of which were built by “Leninskaya forge” in 2004 for Uzbekistan Border Guard Service with US funding (at 5,6 million). The boat of the 58155 project ("Gyurza-M") is larger than its prototype, and has a total displacement of 50,7 tons, a length of 23 meter, a width of 4,8 meter and a draft of 1 meter. The maximum speed "Gurzy-M" to 25 knots, cruising range of economic course 700 miles, autonomy for five days. The crew is only five people. The armament of the boat is made up of two remotely controlled naval combat modules BM-5.01 "Katran-M" (about which we wrote our blog) produced by the GP Mykolayiv Repair-Mechanical Plant, which is a variant of the BM-3 "Storm" combat module for armored vehicles. Each Katran-M module includes an 30-mm automatic gun ZTM1, 30-mm automatic grenade launcher and 7,62-mm CT machine gun, as well as two Barrier ATGMs with a laser guidance system. The boat is equipped with an optical-electronic fire control system and also has a set of portable air defense missile systems.
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sader
    Sader 27 October 2012 11: 49
    +10
    to go fishing for the generals? laughing
    1. Diesel
      Diesel 27 October 2012 11: 52
      +1
      Took off the tongue)) + laughing laughing
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 27 October 2012 13: 39
        +10
        In vain you laugh! The boat, although small, is armed very seriously!
        1. sir.jonn
          sir.jonn 27 October 2012 15: 07
          +7
          Really not a big but very toothy boat, well suited for its purpose.
        2. itr
          itr 28 October 2012 09: 17
          +1
          Sell ​​to Georgians
          1. Splin
            Splin 28 October 2012 10: 33
            +1
            itr,

            So will we live in orange time? Already, even the Saah does not have power in Georgia, and you lament everything like a grandmother!
    2. bamboo
      bamboo 27 October 2012 17: 05
      0
      NOOOO, build and sell))) as always)))
  2. anchonsha
    anchonsha 27 October 2012 12: 11
    +7
    Well, this is a technique. All the same, Nikolaev shipbuilders will at least support their enterprise for survival.
    1. Splin
      Splin 27 October 2012 12: 14
      +5
      Uzbeks have been operating "Gyurza" for 8 years - nothing is satisfied
    2. andrey_sk
      andrey_sk 27 October 2012 14: 01
      +5
      They are, after all, being built in Kiev, and not in Nikolaev. In Kiev - small boats, in Nikolaev - corvette and current repairs of existing ships, in Feodosia - boats and ships for border guards.
    3. Captain Vrungel
      Captain Vrungel 27 October 2012 14: 02
      +4
      Boats are not laid in Nikolaev, but in Kiev. For the Danube will do. For the sea, just like walking in calm weather and with a wave of half a meter. The sea is far from the Amu Darya and seaworthy sea boats are needed, not river ones. The Black Sea betrays no worse than the Biscay.
      What is the point for the Sea of ​​Azov? They think with whom to fight.
      1. andrey_sk
        andrey_sk 27 October 2012 14: 21
        +2
        They have nothing to do at sea, even in Azov. And for the Danube - just right. Romanians have about 20-30 monitors and boats there, however, all the old galoshes. Ukraine needs to have 6-9 such boats there, for balance.
      2. Old_kapitan
        Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 15: 23
        -4
        The Black Sea betrays no worse than the Biscay.


        As reported by the Black Sea - I saw when my son served on "Ternopil". But I also saw a minesweeper in the stormy Barents Sea. We do not know anything about seaworthiness, so we will not judge.

        What is the point for the Sea of ​​Azov? They think with whom to fight.


        How with whom? With Russia, probably ... wink
        1. nnz226
          nnz226 27 October 2012 23: 40
          0
          In Sevastopol there is a type of urban transport - passenger boats - people are being transported to the North side. So their displacement is about 200 tons. And here with the 50 th tons and to the Black Sea ??? Only in a dull calm !!! Of course it’s suitable for rivers. In the USSR, armored boats were exclusively river.
  3. in reserve
    in reserve 27 October 2012 12: 40
    +4
    A good boat for the coastal zone.
    1. in reserve
      in reserve 27 October 2012 21: 51
      +3
      Whoever minuses me there, who served in the border troops knows that they cannot do without them.
  4. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 12: 44
    +3
    the number of boats built "will depend on funding"

    I see ... God grant that these be completed ...
  5. Manager
    Manager 27 October 2012 13: 24
    -8
    We need Isminits class ships, an aircraft carrier, etc., .... And this is so small. In case of conflict with Japan, 100 such snakes will not help us (at sea)
    1. baltika-18
      baltika-18 27 October 2012 13: 31
      +5
      Quote: Manager
      We need Isminits class ships, an aircraft carrier, etc., .... And this is so small. In case of conflict with Japan, 100 such snakes will not help us (at sea)

      How will Ukraine fight with Japan?
    2. wasjasibirjac
      wasjasibirjac 27 October 2012 13: 34
      +1
      in the sea - yes, and what about their shores. no need to protect? It’s quite suitable to cover the coast from the raids of scarlet ships and intelligence
    3. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 13: 37
      +3
      And what is "Isminits !?
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 27 October 2012 16: 18
      0
      Managers are such managers))))
      1. Manager
        Manager 29 October 2012 10: 31
        0
        Flock of sheep and hyenas.
        When the redistribution of the world begins, I will see how you will laugh sheep’s brainless.
    5. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 27 October 2012 20: 01
      +3
      Quote: Manager
      Isminits, aircraft carrier, etc.

      Better river ones, so that the Danube was exactly under control, one aircraft carrier "Mazepa" and two Isminets to the sides of "Yushchenko" and "Timashenko", well, and immediately put them on a concrete base wink
  6. askort154
    askort154 27 October 2012 13: 40
    +1
    In fact, gyurza is a land reptile. Call a surface ship?
    "As you name it, it will float", there is a nautical proverb.
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 13: 55
      -3
      Those. "Kursk" sank because it was called "Granite"?
      1. askort154
        askort154 27 October 2012 15: 09
        0
        Many ships have sunk, the kingdom of heaven for their crews. Since you slander the "KURSK", I'm sorry, you
        1. Old_kapitan
          Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 15: 19
          0
          Where did I gossip? Point with your finger.
  7. sir.jonn
    sir.jonn 27 October 2012 13: 47
    +3
    It is a pity that Ukraine and Russia did not begin to defend joint work in the field of shipbuilding in troubled times, and this was precisely what crushed the industry in both countries. Naturally, the main reason for this was the deliberate work of the West in this direction.
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 14: 09
      +1
      Quote: sir.jonn
      It is a pity that Ukraine and Russia did not begin to defend joint work in the field of shipbuilding in troubled times, and this was precisely what crushed the industry in both countries. Naturally, the main reason for this was the deliberate work of the West in this direction.


      Who would doubt that! The Union collapsed, and a strong Russia to them like a bone in the throat. It is a pity, Ukraine was led to the lordly promises ...
      1. gladiatorakz
        gladiatorakz 27 October 2012 19: 52
        0
        Quote: Old_Kapitan
        It is a pity, Ukraine was led to the lordly promises ...

        Not Ukraine, but orange evil spirits. Do not confuse your own and national.
  8. sir.jonn
    sir.jonn 27 October 2012 15: 25
    +3
    I tried to look a little about such boats, so it turns out that Israel occupies a niche with two similar boats of this class, Super Dvora and Shaldag, so with a competent approach, Ukraine can become a good competitor with its Gyurza-M, of course, if it decides to make an option on export and will promote it
    1. Splin
      Splin 27 October 2012 15: 46
      +1
      They were sold for export, but here’s a big deal. It still depends on whether they will install the units declared in the documentation or mount six-barrel main guns. In the latter case, 9 boats will be tantamount to all the Romanian flotilla on the Danube.
  9. pristav
    pristav 27 October 2012 15: 26
    0
    Video (in Ukrainian): http://wpristav.ru/news/video_zakladka_katerov_dlja_vmsu/2012-10-26-1496
  10. awg75
    awg75 27 October 2012 16: 10
    -7
    frankly, this is not the boat that can be discussed ---- we will be frank on this shit only to drive poachers (and even that is unlikely to be useful)
    1. sir.jonn
      sir.jonn 27 October 2012 16: 42
      +4
      This boat is designed specifically to drive poachers and smugglers. For other purposes there will be other ships.
  11. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 16: 26
    +7
    awg75,
    Do you propose to drive an aircraft carrier to the Danube? Oh well...
  12. Oleg14774
    Oleg14774 27 October 2012 19: 25
    0
    Not Ukraine was led, but venal puppet politicians! But Ukraine and Russia are twin brothers (or sisters, however, what is the difference, the meaning is clear wink )

    Carriers and for Russia are unnecessary and wasteful thing. BDK or aircraft carriers such as Mistral. And why do we need 70 tons of displacement? We are not going to fight. We are not amers, we are a self-sufficient country. If you lower the iron curtain, expel all the riffraff, close all the magazines, newspapers, programs that molest youth, cut off all supplies of drugs, develop a patriotic ideology for youth, then Russia would revive. But here, of course, harsh measures are needed against the aligarchs and various Serdyukov-Kudin-Meadow. I won’t continue, otherwise they will take me for a Stalinist. Although I do not consider this an insult. Do you think that from this point on, Stalin was right and did he have other measures of influence if he knew that the war was just around the corner?
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 28 October 2012 21: 37
      0
      Quote: Oleg147741
      Carriers and for Russia are unnecessary and wasteful thing.

      The army, probably, is an unnecessary and wasteful thing for us, is it? (I quote you)
      Quote: Oleg147741
      We are not going to fight.

      And, yes, we may not be going to (and how do you know?), But what if some Japan comes together?
  13. CARBON
    CARBON 27 October 2012 22: 10
    +1
    So soon there will be a showdown over the Danube. So the Supreme does not want to give it to the great Romanians. You see the money is good there.
  14. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 27 October 2012 22: 46
    +1
    Quote: Oleg147741
    Do you think that from this point on, Stalin was right and did he have other measures of influence if he knew that the war was just around the corner?

    If I answer honestly now, they will accept me as a Stalinist! winked Is the answer clear?
  15. mazdie
    mazdie 27 October 2012 23: 10
    +5
    I'm happy for the Brothers!
  16. phantom359
    phantom359 28 October 2012 00: 32
    -1
    Again nagging if there is money. Less fuss in parliament and fewer parties, blows, freedom, etc. crap, then the money will appear.
  17. Captain45
    Captain45 28 October 2012 10: 29
    -2
    I will not judge the performance characteristics of the boat, they build for themselves, based on some of their goals and objectives, well, God bless them. The article was interested in something else: "at the JSC" Plant "Leninskaya Kuznitsa" in Kiev ". Just think about the name of the plant - "Leninskaya Kuznitsa" and where - in Kiev. So it turns out that not everyone in Ukraine has gone crazy in their anti-Russian hysteria. Even if the tractor plant in Kharkov was restored in the name - Stalin Tractor Plant, then one can think of a real reunification of the Union.
    1. Splin
      Splin 28 October 2012 10: 38
      +2
      Nobody scolds Lenin in Ukraine, only ardent Natsik. Almost all cities preserved monuments to him. English women, this summer at the Euro, were considered the main attraction of Donetsk, a monument to Lenin. They themselves have bars and modern infrastructure. But there is no such monument
  18. Armata
    Armata 28 October 2012 17: 19
    +1
    Well, start with the fact that 25 nodes are a bit slow. Equipment and mechanisms are mostly foreign. Although I congratulate Ukraine. Brothers finally started to do something.
  19. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 28 October 2012 21: 57
    0
    I think armored boats are atavism, from which the armor protects. from AK? what means of attack are you planning to protect
    1. Cat
      Cat 28 October 2012 23: 19
      0
      From a small arms, or from a machine gun will protect. This is quite enough, because a rare Romanian RPG carries in his bosom.
      Well, what if an enemy battleship appears on the horizon - an armored boat, due to its small size, will always be able to stumble in the thickets of reeds =)
  20. suharev-52
    suharev-52 28 October 2012 23: 03
    +2
    Mechanic. I support. Well done, brothers Slavs. I searched for how to formulate for a long time, I think for the Slav brothers - they won’t be offended. Sincerely.
  21. Kapralwdw
    Kapralwdw 11 November 2015 22: 12
    0
    the guys finally launched these boats into the water !!! Shary advertised this essay !! glory to usraine !!