Bookmark armored "Gyurza-M" for the Ukrainian Navy

32 825 43

On October 25, 2012, the first two Project 58155 (Gyurza-M) small armored artillery boats intended for the Ukrainian Navy were laid down at the Leninskaya Kuznitsa Plant in Kyiv. The boats are planned to be used to solve problems in the Danube River basin and in the coastal zone of the Black and Azov Seas. According to the press service of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, nine Gyurza-M type boats are planned to be built for the Ukrainian Navy by 2017. However, during the laying ceremony of the first two units on October 25, First Deputy Defense Minister of Ukraine Oleksandr Oleynik noted that the number of built boats "will depend on funding."

The Project 58155 armored boat ("Gyurza-M") was developed by the Ukrainian enterprise "State Research and Design Center for Shipbuilding" (Nikolaev) and is a further development of the Project 58150 ("Gyurza") boats, two units of which were built by "Leninskaya Kuznitsa" in 2004 for the border service of Uzbekistan using American funding (5,6 million dollars). The Project 58155 ("Gyurza-M") boat is larger than its prototype and has a full displacement of 50,7 tons, a length of 23 meters, a width of 4,8 meters and a draft of 1 meter. The maximum speed of the "Gyurza-M" is up to 25 knots, a cruising range at economic speed of 700 miles, and an endurance of five days. The crew is only five people. The boat's armament consists of two remotely controlled naval combat modules BM-5M.01 "Katran-M" (which our blog wrote about) produced by the State Enterprise "Mykolaiv Repair and Mechanical Plant", which are a version of the BM-3 "Shturm" combat module for armored vehicles. Each "Katran-M" module includes a 30-mm automatic cannon ZTM1, a 30-mm automatic grenade launcher and a 7,62-mm machine gun KT, as well as two ATGM "Barrier" with a laser guidance system. The boat is equipped with an optical-electronic fire control system and also has a portable air defense missile system.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sader
    10+
    27 October 2012 11: 49
    to go fishing for the generals? laughing
    1. Diesel
      +1
      27 October 2012 11: 52
      Took off the tongue)) + laughing laughing
      1. 10+
        27 October 2012 13: 39
        In vain you laugh! The boat, although small, is armed very seriously!
        1. +7
          27 October 2012 15: 07
          Really not a big but very toothy boat, well suited for its purpose.
        2. itr
          +1
          28 October 2012 09: 17
          Sell ​​to Georgians
          1. Splin
            +1
            28 October 2012 10: 33
            itr,

            So will we live in orange time? Already, even the Saah does not have power in Georgia, and you lament everything like a grandmother!
    2. bamboo
      0
      27 October 2012 17: 05
      NOOOO, build and sell))) as always)))
  2. anchonsha
    +7
    27 October 2012 12: 11
    Well, that's technology. After all, Nikolaev shipbuilders will at least support their enterprise in this way for survival.
    1. Splin
      +5
      27 October 2012 12: 14
      Uzbeks have been operating "Gyurza" for 8 years - nothing is satisfied
    2. andrey_sk
      +5
      27 October 2012 14: 01
      They are, after all, being built in Kiev, and not in Nikolaev. In Kiev - small boats, in Nikolaev - corvette and current repairs of existing ships, in Feodosia - boats and ships for border guards.
    3. Captain Vrungel
      +4
      27 October 2012 14: 02
      Boats are not laid in Nikolaev, but in Kiev. For the Danube will do. For the sea, just like walking in calm weather and with a wave of half a meter. The sea is far from the Amu Darya and seaworthy sea boats are needed, not river ones. The Black Sea betrays no worse than the Biscay.
      What is the point for the Sea of ​​Azov? They think with whom to fight.
      1. andrey_sk
        +2
        27 October 2012 14: 21
        They have nothing to do at sea, even in Azov. And for the Danube - just right. Romanians have about 20-30 monitors and boats there, however, all the old galoshes. Ukraine needs to have 6-9 such boats there, for balance.
      2. -4
        27 October 2012 15: 23
        The Black Sea betrays no worse than the Biscay.


        As reported by the Black Sea - I saw when my son served on "Ternopil". But I also saw a minesweeper in the stormy Barents Sea. We do not know anything about seaworthiness, so we will not judge.

        What is the point for the Sea of ​​Azov? They think with whom to fight.


        How with whom? With Russia, probably ... wink
        1. 0
          27 October 2012 23: 40
          In Sevastopol there is a type of city transport - passenger boats - they take people to the Northern side. So their displacement is about 200 tons. And here with 50 tons and to the Black Sea??? Only in dead calm!!! Of course it will be suitable for rivers. In the USSR, armored boats were exclusively river ones.
  3. in reserve
    +4
    27 October 2012 12: 40
    A good boat for the coastal zone.
    1. in reserve
      +3
      27 October 2012 21: 51
      Whoever minuses me there, who served in the border troops knows that they cannot do without them.
  4. +3
    27 October 2012 12: 44
    the number of boats built "will depend on funding"

    I see ... God grant that these be completed ...
  5. -8
    27 October 2012 13: 24
    We need Isminits class ships, an aircraft carrier, etc., .... And this is so small. In case of conflict with Japan, 100 such snakes will not help us (at sea)
    1. +5
      27 October 2012 13: 31
      Quote: Manager
      We need Isminits class ships, an aircraft carrier, etc., .... And this is so small. In case of conflict with Japan, 100 such snakes will not help us (at sea)

      How will Ukraine fight with Japan?
    2. +1
      27 October 2012 13: 34
      in the sea - yes, and what about their shores. no need to protect? It’s quite suitable to cover the coast from the raids of scarlet ships and intelligence
    3. +3
      27 October 2012 13: 37
      And what is "Isminits !?
    4. 0
      27 October 2012 16: 18
      Managers are such managers))))
      1. 0
        29 October 2012 10: 31
        Flock of sheep and hyenas.
        When the redistribution of the world begins, I will see how you will laugh sheep’s brainless.
    5. +3
      27 October 2012 20: 01
      Quote: Manager
      Isminits, aircraft carrier, etc.

      Better river ones, so that the Danube was exactly under control, one aircraft carrier "Mazepa" and two Isminets to the sides of "Yushchenko" and "Timashenko", well, and immediately put them on a concrete base wink
  6. +1
    27 October 2012 13: 40
    Actually, the gyurza is a land reptile. Name a surface vessel?
    "As you name it, so it will float" is a marine proverb.
    1. -3
      27 October 2012 13: 55
      Those. "Kursk" sank because it was called "Granite"?
      1. 0
        27 October 2012 15: 09
        Many ships sank, may their crews rest in peace. If you slander the "KURSK", I'm sorry, you
        1. 0
          27 October 2012 15: 19
          Where did I gossip? Point with your finger.
  7. +3
    27 October 2012 13: 47
    It is a pity that Ukraine and Russia did not advocate joint work in the field of shipbuilding in the troubled times, this is what crushed the industry in both countries. Naturally, the main reason for this was the targeted work of the West in this direction.
    1. +1
      27 October 2012 14: 09
      Quote: sir.jonn
      It is a pity that Ukraine and Russia did not begin to defend joint work in the field of shipbuilding in troubled times, and this was precisely what crushed the industry in both countries. Naturally, the main reason for this was the deliberate work of the West in this direction.


      Who would doubt that! The Union collapsed, and a strong Russia to them like a bone in the throat. It is a pity, Ukraine was led to the lordly promises ...
      1. gladiatorakz
        0
        27 October 2012 19: 52
        Quote: Old_Kapitan
        It is a pity, Ukraine was led to the lordly promises ...

        Not Ukraine, but orange evil spirits. Do not confuse your own and national.
  8. +3
    27 October 2012 15: 25
    I tried to search a little about similar boats, and it turns out that Israel occupies a niche with two similar boats of this class, "Super Dvora" and "Shaldag", so with a competent approach, Ukraine can become a good competitor with its "Gyurza-M", of course, if it decides to make an export version and starts promoting it
    1. Splin
      +1
      27 October 2012 15: 46
      They were sold for export, but for themselves it was a piece of cake. It still depends on whether they will install the installations stated in the documentation or mount six-barreled GSh. In the latter case, 9 boats will be equivalent to the entire Romanian flotilla on the Danube.
  9. 0
    27 October 2012 15: 26
    Video (in Ukrainian): http://wpristav.ru/news/video_zakladka_katerov_dlja_vmsu/2012-10-26-1496
  10. -7
    27 October 2012 16: 10
    to be honest, this is not a boat that can be discussed----let's be honest, this SHIT is only good for chasing poachers (and even then it's unlikely to be useful)
    1. +4
      27 October 2012 16: 42
      This boat is designed specifically to chase poachers and smugglers. There will be other ships for other purposes.
  11. +7
    27 October 2012 16: 26
    awg75,
    Do you propose to drive an aircraft carrier to the Danube? Oh well...
  12. 0
    27 October 2012 19: 25
    Not Ukraine was led, but venal puppet politicians! But Ukraine and Russia are twin brothers (or sisters, however, what is the difference, the meaning is clear wink )

    Carriers and for Russia are unnecessary and wasteful thing. BDK or aircraft carriers such as Mistral. And why do we need 70 tons of displacement? We are not going to fight. We are not amers, we are a self-sufficient country. If you lower the iron curtain, expel all the riffraff, close all the magazines, newspapers, programs that molest youth, cut off all supplies of drugs, develop a patriotic ideology for youth, then Russia would revive. But here, of course, harsh measures are needed against the aligarchs and various Serdyukov-Kudin-Meadow. I won’t continue, otherwise they will take me for a Stalinist. Although I do not consider this an insult. Do you think that from this point on, Stalin was right and did he have other measures of influence if he knew that the war was just around the corner?
    1. 0
      28 October 2012 21: 37
      Quote: Oleg147741
      Carriers and for Russia are unnecessary and wasteful thing.

      The army, probably, is an unnecessary and wasteful thing for us, is it? (I quote you)
      Quote: Oleg147741
      We are not going to fight.

      And, yes, we may not be going to (and how do you know?), But what if some Japan comes together?
  13. CARBON
    +1
    27 October 2012 22: 10
    So soon there will be a showdown over the Danube. So the Supreme does not want to give it to the great Romanians. You see the money is good there.
  14. +1
    27 October 2012 22: 46
    Quote: Oleg147741
    Do you think that from this point on, Stalin was right and did he have other measures of influence if he knew that the war was just around the corner?

    If I answer honestly now, they will accept me as a Stalinist! winked Is the answer clear?
  15. mazdie
    +5
    27 October 2012 23: 10
    I'm happy for the Brothers!
  16. phantom359
    -1
    28 October 2012 00: 32
    Again nagging if there is money. Less fuss in parliament and fewer parties, blows, freedom, etc. crap, then the money will appear.
  17. -2
    28 October 2012 10: 29
    I will not judge the performance characteristics of the boat, they build for themselves, based on some of their goals and objectives, well, God bless them. The article was interested in something else: "at the JSC" Plant "Leninskaya Kuznitsa" in Kiev ". Just think about the name of the plant - "Leninskaya Kuznitsa" and where - in Kiev. So it turns out that not everyone in Ukraine has gone crazy in their anti-Russian hysteria. Even if the tractor plant in Kharkov was restored in the name - Stalin Tractor Plant, then one can think of a real reunification of the Union.
    1. Splin
      +2
      28 October 2012 10: 38
      Nobody scolds Lenin in Ukraine, only ardent Natsik. Almost all cities preserved monuments to him. English women, this summer at the Euro, were considered the main attraction of Donetsk, a monument to Lenin. They themselves have bars and modern infrastructure. But there is no such monument
  18. +1
    28 October 2012 17: 19
    Well, start with the fact that 25 nodes are a bit slow. Equipment and mechanisms are mostly foreign. Although I congratulate Ukraine. Brothers finally started to do something.
  19. 0
    28 October 2012 21: 57
    I think armored boats are atavism, from which the armor protects. from AK? what means of attack are you planning to protect
    1. Cat
      0
      28 October 2012 23: 19
      It will protect against a small-arms rifle or a machine gun. This is quite enough, because a rare Romanian carries an RPG in his bosom.
      Well, what if an enemy battleship appears on the horizon - an armored boat, due to its small size, can always hide in the reeds =)
  20. +2
    28 October 2012 23: 03
    Mechanic. I support. Well done, brothers Slavs. I searched for how to formulate for a long time, I think for the Slav brothers - they won’t be offended. Sincerely.
  21. 0
    11 November 2015 22: 12
    Guys, these boats have finally been launched!!! Shariy advertised this essay!! Glory to Ukraine!!