Belarusian strike UAVs "Quadro" and "loitering pipe"

44
Belarusian strike UAVs "Quadro" and "loitering pipe"
Impact UAV "Quadro-1400" at the exhibition MILEX-2021


The Belarusian industry is developing its own unmanned aerial vehicles for various purposes. So, a few years ago she introduced Drones "Quadro-1400" and "loitering pipe", equipped with rocket-propelled anti-tank grenades and capable of hitting various ground targets. As reported, to date, two of these products have been tested and have been put into service.



Light percussion


Attack drones aviation complexes (UBAK) "Quadro" and "loitering pipe" were developed by the Vitebsk design bureau "Display". The main field of activity of this enterprise is radio-electronic systems for various equipment, but a few years ago it began to master the direction of unmanned aircraft.

Finished products "Quadro-1600" and "loitering pipe" were first shown in mid-2018 at a conference of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus dedicated to the development of UAVs. Two drones became exhibits of the exhibition as part of the conference, and a few days later demonstration flights took place at one of the training grounds.


Product "loitering pipe"

In the future, two new UAVs / UBAK were demonstrated several times at exhibitions. Thus, the first public display took place in May 2019 at the MILEX-2019 exhibition. At this event, Display Design Bureau presented a pair of attack drones, as well as ground-based robotic systems with similar weapons.

Soon KB "Display" developed and introduced the apparatus "Quadro-1400". In terms of characteristics and capabilities, it was similar to the 1600 product, but differed in design and placement of weapons. The number of propeller groups was reduced to four, and the armament was placed above the frame. Later, the new UAV was repeatedly shown at new exhibitions, and it actually replaced the older Quadro-1600.

For several years, "Quadro-1400" and "Pipe" passed the necessary tests and fine-tuning. The design, software, etc. were improved. As it is now clear, all these works were carried out with an eye on mass production and transfer of equipment to the troops.


"Quadro-1400" on trials

On October 19, the telegram channel Otvinta - Aviation of Belarus, citing its sources, reported that two new UBAKs were adopted by the Belarusian army. However, no further details are provided. It is not known exactly when the UAVs entered service, for which units and divisions they are intended, etc.

General solutions


The Belarusian UBAK "Quadro" and "loitering pipe" are built on the basis of common ideas and are generally similar to each other. This is a helicopter-type UAV with several propeller groups based on electric motors. The main body contains the control equipment and the battery, and weapons and controls are installed on it.

With the same scheme, the devices differ markedly from each other. They have different sizes and weights, show different flight characteristics and carry different types of combat equipment. There may also be differences in on-board electronics that provide flight and the use of weapons.


The process of installing grenades

UAV "Quadro-1600" is a helicopter with a size of 1,5 x 1,5 m in plan and a height of about 500-600 mm with eight motors and propellers. Takeoff weight - approx. 45 kg. It is made on the basis of a lightweight tubular frame and has a small body. Under the latter, two rocket-propelled anti-tank grenades RPG-26 are suspended on a mobile installation. There is a possibility of vertical aiming. For flights, target search and shooting, video cameras and a thermal imager are used.

It was reported that the Quadro-1600 is capable of speeds of 40 km / h and move away from the operator by 6 km. Flight duration - 25 min. It was possible to work in a wide range of air temperatures.

In the Quadro-1400 project, a simpler quadrocopter scheme was used, for which a different frame with a body was developed and engines of a suitable model were selected. In addition, the 1400 model received an oscillating launcher for two RPG-26s placed on top of the hull.

In terms of size, the Quadro-1400 is similar to the UAV of the 1600 type, and the weight has been reduced to 35 kg. The radius of action has decreased to 5 km, while the duration of the flight has remained the same.


Grenade fuse control mechanism

The smallest example of the line is the UBAK "loitering pipe". This is a quadrocopter measuring 750 x 750 mm, 350 mm high and weighing 12 kg. One RPG-26 is rigidly fixed under its hull. The battery of smaller dimensions and capacity allows you to stay in the air for 15 minutes.

UAVs of the family are controlled using a unified operator station in a secure housing. It is equipped with two screens for outputting video signal and other information, and also has a compact wired remote control with the necessary controls.

All attack UAVs from KB "Display" are armed with an RPG-26 "Aglen" rocket-propelled grenade - one or two such products. Launchers are equipped with mechanisms for managing a regular fuse weapons and descender. Any refinement of the grenade before installation on the UBAK is not required. The RPG-26 grenade has a mass of 2,9 kg and is equipped with a 72,5 mm round. The cumulative warhead penetrates 440 mm of homogeneous armor.


Operator station

Multipurpose tool


Light and medium UAVs, incl. helicopter type are mainly used for reconnaissance. Nevertheless, a lot of projects are being proposed to turn such equipment into a full-fledged combat unit with fire weapons on board. The Belarusian projects "Quadro" and "loitering pipe" follow this trend and give the planned result. At the same time, they have already been able to reach the official adoption, which distinguishes them from other developments of this kind.

UAVs of this class have a number of strengths and may indeed be of interest to armies. The main advantage of such an apparatus is its ability to solve various tasks in the interests of the troops. Like other multicopters, UBAK are capable of reconnaissance and search for enemy targets. At the same time, the presence of weapons on board allows you to immediately hit the target found, without wasting time and without involving other means.

The performance characteristics of the two options "Quadro" and "Pipe" are generally sufficient for use at the level of a platoon or company. The device weighing no more than 35-45 kg can be carried disassembled or transported by accessible transport. A range of up to 5-6 km is quite sufficient for such units.

In its current form, UAVs from the Display Design Bureau use RPG-26 rocket-propelled anti-tank grenades. This weapon is included in the regular ammunition of various units, which should greatly simplify the use of drones. In addition, the grenade is small in weight and size, which allows it to be used with light air platforms.


Target hit: view from the aiming camera

At the same time, the small dimensions of the grenade limit its combat characteristics. However, the placement of the Aglen product on the UBAK makes it possible to level out such shortcomings. A drone, unlike a grenade launcher, can approach the target at the optimal distance without much difficulty and attack it in the least protected projection.

Complexes in service


In general, UBAK based on a light or medium multicopter with grenade launchers is of particular interest to the armies. A complex of this kind is distinguished by its simple design, not too complicated in production and operation. At the same time, it allows you to significantly increase the reconnaissance and combat capabilities of the unit.

The Belarusian army has already evaluated several options for implementing such a concept, after which it adopted two of them. In the near future, the Kvadro-1400 and Loitering Pipe UAVs can go into production and enter combat units. How useful such a technique will be during actual operation, time will tell.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    26 October 2022 05: 07
    Of course, 5-6 km is a short distance, generally accessible to anti-tank systems, but on terrain with natural and artificial obstacles, and in combination with reconnaissance copters, such strikers can hardly be overestimated!
    1. +9
      26 October 2022 05: 27
      You can climb into some kind of hole with a dozen of these drones and calmly work on the enemy’s equipment at night ... try to detect and shoot down ... then Geraniums are tormented to shoot down motorcycles ... and these disgusting Belarusian things with grenade launchers are even worse ... flew up quietly they fired in the folds of the terrain and washed off ... look for the wind in the field.
      1. +1
        26 October 2022 05: 31
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        You can climb into some kind of hole with a dozen of these drones and calmly work on enemy equipment at night.

        Moreover, thermal imagers seem to be there.
      2. 0
        27 October 2022 20: 45
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        and these vile Belarusian things

        Why are you scolding Belarus?
        Very good stuff.
        Well done, I'm saving.
      3. 0
        29 December 2022 14: 21
        In general, as a bonus ... you can fly closer to the line of contact ... and sit down until night ... and then take off and fly already into the depths, bringing chaos
    2. +4
      26 October 2022 05: 31
      So for reflection, near Donetsk, the war is at arm's length, and if a similar device, only with a universal mount and a program under any hand grenade and pzrka will dramatically increase the lethality of assault groups
      1. +4
        26 October 2022 05: 38
        Quote: Guran33 Sergey
        for any hand grenade launcher

        Don't forget about payload. In addition, Aglen takes 440 mm of armor, and from the stern of the tank this is an overkill. A warhead weighing a kilo and the infantry will not leave indifferent.
        1. +1
          27 October 2022 01: 00
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Don't forget about payload

          And if you do not limit yourself to RPGs and provide for the suspension of a certain number of bombs instead of them? Let's say use captured 60 mm as such. mines to NATO mortars? It's like jewelry, and how many times in a row can you put such in a trench? On the roof of the BMP? In the open hatch of the tank, on the KShM, gun crew?
          And how effective can such multicopters be during urban battles? With their massive use, how many lives of our attack aircraft can be saved? Reconnaissance, suppression of firing points - "Bumblebee" through the window (I understand, it's harder than RPGs, so hang one instead of two), sweep.
          Such equipment must be urgently adopted by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, to establish the production of such multicopters at all enterprises suitable for this, and not to stop there - to increase the carrying capacity and duration of the flight, to integrate ATGMs into such a copter. And all this must be dealt with immediately and with the greatest possible scope.
          1. 0
            27 October 2022 20: 51
            Quote: bayard
            It's like jewelry, and how many times in a row can you put such in a trench? On the roof of the BMP? In the open hatch of the tank, on the KShM, gun crew?

            Don't forget the noise.
            Those that have 8 or more "beams" - even with one propeller (you can also stick one more from below) on the beam - make good noise like that.
            1. 0
              27 October 2022 22: 30
              Many engines poke when too lazy four normal - suitable power, wind up. They just take what they have and assemble it like Lego.
              There will be an order and a systematic approach, they will do everything right.
  2. +1
    26 October 2022 06: 03
    And why has not yet been tested in his.
  3. +1
    26 October 2022 06: 53
    IMHO, a bla-kamikaze with a 1kg warhead will be more effective. Less, more accurate, especially for moving targets, and the flight range is higher. Plus easier to maintain
    1. +1
      26 October 2022 08: 54
      When I see our Lancet, the Israeli Spike NLOS comes to mind. Externally, they are very similar. Instead of electric pushers, ours would install a rocket TD engine and a cumulative warhead, turning it into an ATGM capable of attacking enemy targets from closed positions. Naturally, they should work in conjunction with trained reconnaissance units armed with UAVs. The advantage of such a missile is the speed of response. If the drone flies to the target at a speed of 185 km / h, then the rocket is already 185 m / s (the numbers are conditional - to understand the "proportions").
      1. -1
        26 October 2022 10: 48
        the drone flies to the target at a speed of 185 km / h, then the rocket is already 185 m / s (the numbers are conditional - to understand the "proportions").

        185 km / h is about 50 meters per second. Not such a big difference
        1. 0
          26 October 2022 12: 17
          Quote: glory1974
          185 km / h is about 50 meters per second. Not such a big difference

          The difference is almost four times. But if we compare the real parameters of the flight speed, then for the Lancet it is 110 km / h, and for the Spike - 185 m / s. The advantage in speed is obvious, but such a complex has an even greater advantage over the same ATGM "Kornet" in that missiles can be launched from closed positions and attack armored targets in the upper projection and hidden behind the terrain. For example, to attack some armored unit of the enemy while still on the way to the line of contact or ready to attack. Yes, and it is easier to shoot down a drone than a rocket.
    2. 0
      26 October 2022 09: 07
      Quote: Tlauicol
      IMHO, a bla-kamikaze with a 1kg warhead will be more effective.

      Difficult to carry, most likely. In addition, this multi-purpose one is like a scout too, and consumes quite regular infantry weapons.
      In general, the Chinese showed this topic - they didn’t stuff anything into heavy quadrics - from machine guns to grenade launchers, they say, they taught them to fly in swarms. Also, it seems in 2018, the Arabs showed at the exhibition
      1. 0
        26 October 2022 09: 10
        Scout for 15 minutes is nonsense. And the reaction time for him, this Belarusian, is longer than for ATGMs. But we desperately need Chinese Blowfish, it's true
        1. 0
          26 October 2022 09: 44
          15 minutes - with a grenade launcher on board, without it ... And what’s the plus here - ours are now massively responding that Stugna-P is more dangerous than Zhabelin - from the remote control, infection, it works, you won’t cover the operator. And here you can’t cover this operator even by accident
          1. 0
            26 October 2022 09: 55
            Without it, he will take target designation equipment. The truth won't lift. And without it, Mavic is enough
    3. DO
      +1
      26 October 2022 10: 03
      bla-kamikaze with a warhead of 1kg will be more effective. Less, more accurate, especially for moving targets, and the flight range is higher.

      It is incorrect to compare a kamikaze and a scout.
      For a kamikaze drone, preliminary reconnaissance and approximate target designation are needed, because it flies in one direction, and its own video camera effectively provides only guidance by the operator to an already captured target. A reconnaissance aircraft from a flying ammunition is worthless, because of the primitiveness and cheapness of its video system.
      And the Belarusian drone under discussion is a reconnaissance aircraft. It is advisable to hang a grenade on it only if there are no other means of destruction in the current situation - kamikaze drones, mortars, artillery / MLRS.
      1. 0
        26 October 2022 10: 15
        Kamikaze can work in squares. Everyone is watching their own little area. And immediately hits the target. And the scout? Trying to call the clinic
        1. DO
          0
          26 October 2022 10: 39
          Kamikaze can work in squares. Everyone is watching their own little area.

          With such an organization, most kamikaze will not find anything by the time they end their lives, and ingloriously self-destruct.
          And the scout? Trying to call the clinic

          With such a sad "polyclinic", we get Krasny Liman more and more.
          By the way, for such cases of chaos, which inevitably happen in life, a reconnaissance copter with a grenade was invented.
          1. 0
            26 October 2022 11: 00
            What for? Kamikaze drones are just making a comeback.
            So I propose "a scout with a big grenade", and not with a phone
            1. DO
              +1
              26 October 2022 11: 18
              Kamikaze drones are just making a comeback.

              Kamikaze Drones Lancets with warheads of 1 and 3 kg are not returned. And this is logical, because their energy source is a conditional cheap disposable battery, and not an expensive rechargeable battery, which is only appropriate for a reusable reconnaissance aircraft.
              1. 0
                26 October 2022 11: 35
                But this is cheaper than the "reconnaissance - artillery" bunch. I won’t argue about the lancet, the world didn’t converge on it like a wedge. But the return option should be for kamikaze
                1. DO
                  0
                  26 October 2022 12: 00
                  But the return option should be for kamikaze

                  In this world, you have to pay for everything, and for the battery instead of the battery too. For the reconnaissance functions you offer, you will also have to install an expensive camera on a kamikaze.
                  Instead of all this, it is much more efficient to rivet more cheap disposable kamikazes for the same money, and launch them only at previously explored targets. This preliminary reconnaissance can be not only and not necessarily from a reconnaissance drone. There may be a simple application of fighters from the front that in such and such a square is rampant, for example, an enemy jeep with a machine gun or anti-tank systems. Although in any case, a drone-observer will not hurt.
                  1. 0
                    26 October 2022 12: 14
                    Yes, but the reaction time will increase. Until the drone flies...
                    Better to overpay for the return option. And an expensive camera is not necessary. Mavic level is enough
                    1. DO
                      0
                      26 October 2022 12: 26
                      Yes, but the reaction time will increase. Until the drone arrives.

                      Yes, perhaps for fast targets like a jeep, the discussed reconnaissance copter from the Old Man with a grenade fired may be preferable.
                      It's hard to say without concrete experience.
                      Better to overpay for the return option. And an expensive camera is not necessary. Mavic level is enough

                      Well, then, attach a grenade to a cheap mavic, and use this mavic on a quick target like a kamikaze drone. At least today, such a kamikaze can turn out even cheaper than the Lancet.
    4. 0
      27 October 2022 20: 53
      The aircraft type clearly wins here, yes.
      And in terms of range, and in speed, and in terms of what you can drag.
      The wing is a useful thing.

      It's like a plane versus a helicopter.
  4. +2
    26 October 2022 07: 20
    I think that from such a "thing" one can derive considerable benefit for a combat unit! The presence of RPGs can only be the "first letter of the alphabet"! You can make containers in the RPG-26 form factor to place special equipment electronic units in them (for example, a laser rangefinder-target designator ...) or the same 60-mm mines ... you can also KAB-20! It is possible to "link" a quadrocopter with a laser target designator with an ATGM using ATGMs with a semi-active laser seeker! (This is in "peak" of the Ukrainian "Stugna-P"!) "Somewhere" (in Venezuela, it seems ...) they developed a 73-mm grenade launcher that fires and controlled grenades! So ... the main thing is to start! wink
    1. 0
      26 October 2022 07: 37
      Where can I get a laser rangefinder-target designator weighing 3kg?
      It's easier to hit the target immediately. Without intermediaries. But instead of a pair of weak grenade launchers, use kamikaze warheads. Or mines
      1. +1
        26 October 2022 16: 24
        Quote: Tlauicol
        Where can I get a laser rangefinder-target designator weighing 3kg?

        Who works, he creates! Who does not want to solve problems, he excuses himself! wink
  5. +1
    26 October 2022 08: 15
    Tanks and other armored vehicles are, of course, necessary. But practice shows that the infantry work more often.
    And in the size of the RPG 26, alas, there is nothing anti-personnel.
    You can be puzzled by the refinement of mortar mines 82 mm. We talked about 60 mm above.
    The network has a lot of videos from drones dropping light "bombs" from VOGs and grenades. Efficiency, let's say honestly weak. It seems that the explosion is sometimes a meter away from the targets. And the targets are actively running away. 82 mm mine in this regard is much more effective. Especially if she finalizes the fuse so that it works a meter above the ground.
  6. +1
    26 October 2022 10: 53
    great drones. Now the one who massively uses them in battle will become the ancestor of a new revolutionary tactic.
    For example, 2-3 BTGs are launched into the attack with the support of a tank battalion, as the enemy is now practicing. 40-50 drones rise into the sky and, 4-5 km before the positions, they begin shooting equipment. Those who reach the line of contact are released towards the robotic dogs with machine guns on their backs. In this situation, I can’t believe that it will come to the infantry sitting in the trenches. Maximum, go out after the battle to collect trophies.
    1. 0
      26 October 2022 13: 29
      Quote: glory1974
      great drones. Now the one who massively uses them in battle will become the ancestor of a new revolutionary tactic.
      For example, 2-3 BTGs are launched into the attack with the support of a tank battalion, as the enemy is now practicing. 40-50 drones rise into the sky and, 4-5 km before the positions, they begin shooting equipment. Those who reach the line of contact are released towards the robotic dogs with machine guns on their backs. In this situation, I can’t believe that it will come to the infantry sitting in the trenches. Maximum, go out after the battle to collect trophies.

      Why be trifle? We just change the soldiers in the trenches to the Terminators and that's it.
      1. 0
        27 October 2022 08: 36
        Why be trifle? We just change the soldiers in the trenches to the Terminators and that's it.

        By the way, there are already terminators. They were developed, built in a small series and used in Ukraine.
        We don’t know how successful it is, but it’s probably no worse than regular BMPs. For Algeria, they made a modification based on a tank with a BMP-2 turret, also probably no worse than our BMP, but better in terms of armor.
        That is, everything is there for successful military operations. It remains to be introduced into the troops. But with our generals, who quadrocopters considered toys, one can hardly expect breakthrough solutions. Only after they are introduced in the West, ours will follow. And there they are already testing a robot soldier with might and main.
  7. +1
    26 October 2022 12: 27
    I would buy a test batch for our troops. You can run it around so that you understand whether the front needs such
  8. +1
    26 October 2022 19: 05
    It would not hurt to test them in real combat conditions in Ukraine.
  9. 0
    26 October 2022 22: 52
    Quote: Tlauicol
    Where can I get a laser rangefinder-target designator weighing 3kg?

    If you haven't been banned on "ALI", you can do it there.
  10. 0
    27 October 2022 23: 52
    The transition of the capabilities of copters from observation to shock functions is obvious. Perhaps even in the NWO we will see footage where a dozen drones are storming the fortifications of the enemy.
    Ps. Naturally, it is not obvious to those whose artagon is corrected ONLY by an observer on a birch. And the old-timers of the theory of grinding the platoon OP within a week with the help of the composition of the BC.
  11. 0
    22 November 2022 00: 10
    It would not hurt to test them in combat conditions! For example, in the NWO in Ukraine.
  12. DO
    0
    12 December 2022 16: 34
    For the Russian army, Belarusian drones are preferable to civilian Chinese drones.
    And if the drones do not have enough performance characteristics, there is the possibility of refinement, including joint, "union".
  13. 0
    10 January 2023 23: 11
    All this is doubtful. It seems that NATO for the Armed Forces of Ukraine supplied stations for determining the coordinates of drone operators with a range of 10 km. Such a drone arrived at the front, turned on, flew, found the operator and covered. What will happen to the drone is also clear.
  14. TIR
    0
    17 January 2023 16: 56
    You still need to get from such a UAV. I think the option with the placement of free-falling cumulative grenades would be much better. Yes, and the time and range of work must be increased. It would be interesting to know if the concept of a quadrocopter with an internal combustion engine for reconnaissance is working