Russian expert spoke about the consequences of the use of strategic nuclear weapons

79
Russian expert spoke about the consequences of the use of strategic nuclear weapons

Deputy of the State Duma of the VI convocation, a specialist in the field of nuclear support of the RF Armed Forces Maxim Shingarkin, during an interview on the Day TV channel, spoke about the consequences of a hypothetical nuclear war for the countries participating in it and for all mankind as a whole.

The expert noted that strategic nuclear weapon, both in Russia and in the United States, in the first place, acts as a deterrent. At the same time, the nuclear potential of each of the above-mentioned powers is enough to destroy the entire population of the enemy several times.



At the same time, according to Shingarkin, even in the event of a hypothetical nuclear war between Russia and the United States, there will still be survivors on the territory of the conflicting countries, because the blow will be delivered mainly to megacities.

A Russian expert described a likely scenario for a 1-Mt nuclear missile strike on a million-plus city. According to Shingarkin, within a radius of 2 km everything will melt, and within a radius of 10 km, a “microwave effect” will result, which will leave no chance for living organisms. At a distance of about 20 km from the epicenter, everything in its path will literally be “demolished” by a blast wave, and within a radius of 40 km, ionizing radiation will act for about a minute. Outside this zone, it is already possible to survive.

As the expert put it, one should not forget about the secondary consequences: large-scale fires, lack of electricity and water supply, as well as other negative factors.

In general, according to Shingarkin, on the territory of the countries participating in the conflict, it is possible to forget about any civilization for a long time, even if part of the population can survive.

At the same time, the expert emphasized that the potential and doctrine of the nuclear powers are calculated in such a way that the states that do not take part in the conflict will not suffer. Therefore, the destruction of the entire human civilization in a nuclear conflict is a myth. However, the expert says, apparently, about the exchange of individual strikes, but not about a massive nuclear attack.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    79 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      24 October 2022 16: 41
      Another balabol ... just to promote
    2. +8
      24 October 2022 16: 42
      survivors will still remain on the territory of the conflicting countries, because the blow will be delivered mainly to megacities.
      and they will envy the dead more than once
    3. +5
      24 October 2022 16: 42
      At the same time, the expert emphasized that the potential and doctrine of the nuclear powers are calculated in such a way that the states that do not take part in the conflict will not suffer.

      What is it like? Radiation works here, but not there? "Wind Rose" is also nothing?
      Therefore, the destruction of the entire human civilization in a nuclear conflict is a myth.

      But nothing that the next war will be with bows and arrows? How is the human "civilization" in the form of mutants and subhumans?
      I even know where it will be
      Deputy of the State Duma of the VI convocation, a specialist in the field of nuclear support of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Maxim Shingarkin
      Just don't tell, otherwise they will be banned forever.
    4. +6
      24 October 2022 16: 42
      Such a course of events cannot be categorically allowed!!
      1. +1
        24 October 2022 20: 58
        Mankind somehow relaxed in a bad way with respect to nuclear weapons. It is necessary to produce an exemplary explosion, 10 megatons, in the atmosphere. So that the flash could be seen far away, the satellites hit, the connection stopped and other delights. Maybe then some will think about the consequences of their actions.
    5. +7
      24 October 2022 16: 43
      ... there will still be survivors on the territory of the conflicting countries ...

      But where do they live? After such an Armageddon, there will be a couple of clean territories and a miscalculation. Well, water, food, etc. So perhaps the living will envy the dead.
      1. +5
        24 October 2022 16: 45
        Quote: Leshak
        Well, water, food, etc.

        there will be no food, medicines, as well, and given that at least 25 percent of the population without constant medication will last only 1-12 months ...
      2. +5
        24 October 2022 16: 47
        HZ...but I, in this scenario, want to be at the epicenter with all my relatives.
        1. +2
          24 October 2022 16: 53
          Quote: Dead Day
          HZ...but I, in this scenario, want to be at the epicenter with all my relatives.

          This is how lucky anyone is. But I agree with you, it's better to go straight to ashes than suffer in the "dark world".
      3. +3
        24 October 2022 16: 52
        Quote: Leshak
        Well, water, food, etc.


        They think to sit out with a supply of food for a while, and then go and buy in supermarkets. Vaughn is recommended in Europe now to charge batteries and phones for the winter. It's like winter for a day..
      4. -3
        24 October 2022 17: 32
        The charges will not be nuclear, but thermonuclear, and they are much cleaner. Already after 7 hours, the dose in the affected area will drop tenfold, after 49 hours - 100 times, and after 14 days - a thousand. After 14 weeks, even in the former "red" zone, it will be possible to walk with almost no risk to life. So you need to sit out in the bunker for about 4 months, and then how lucky you are in the new world.
        1. -1
          24 October 2022 18: 48
          Quote: ALARI
          After 14 weeks, even in the former "red" zone, it will be possible to walk with almost no risk to life.

          With an air explosion, there may not be a "red zone" at all.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 18: 57
            Quote: DenVB
            Quote: ALARI
            After 14 weeks, even in the former "red" zone, it will be possible to walk with almost no risk to life.

            With an air explosion, there may not be a "red zone" at all.

            Lord, how many dreamers are here... it wasn't you who, by chance, set fire to the solarium in the palm of your hand? I remember how laughing
        2. 0
          27 October 2022 23: 30
          The population must remain in the basements for 4 days and then vacate. This reduces losses by 10 times.
      5. +1
        24 October 2022 17: 59
        Quote: Leshak
        Well, water, food, etc. So perhaps the living will envy the dead.

        For a while they will live in pain. Some will live longer, adapt, maybe give birth to mutants. But life will be like the early Middle Ages. Although in some areas, the population will be less radiation, but due to the completely destroyed infrastructure, the same early Middle Ages. But there will be no next world war, for the world will consist of disparate tribes, far from each other.
    6. +5
      24 October 2022 16: 48
      Nuclear winter on earth. Some years. There are no plants, no animals and no humanity. I don't think this scenario should be tried.
      1. +2
        24 October 2022 16: 52
        Quote: Oberleutnant
        Nuclear winter on earth. Some years. There are no plants, no animals and no humanity. I don't think this scenario should be tried.

        hello Oberleutnant, from an old soldier of the Western Group of Forces.
        1. +1
          24 October 2022 17: 59
          And from the old soldier of the GSVG, too, hello soldier
        2. +2
          26 October 2022 16: 38
          Hello too! I'm glad to hear from our generation.
        3. +2
          26 October 2022 16: 40
          Thank you. There were good times. There were many meetings. They understood each other well.
      2. +1
        24 October 2022 16: 52
        Quote: Oberleutnant
        Nuclear winter on earth. Some years.

        This is just a hypothesis. Which looks rather doubtful.
        1. +3
          24 October 2022 16: 55
          Quote: DenVB
          This is just a hypothesis. Which looks rather doubtful.

          but the lack of food and medicine is a real fact
          1. -3
            24 October 2022 17: 01
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            but the lack of food and medicine is a real fact

            In affected countries, yes. And in the rest, where will the products go?
            1. +1
              24 October 2022 18: 57
              The problem is that many, including you, believe that products come from the store
              Can you imagine the whole technological process of SH?
              1. -2
                24 October 2022 19: 31
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                The problem is that many, including you, believe that products come from the store
                Can you imagine the whole technological process of SH?

                Yes. I grow my own potatoes.

                So where will food go in non-nuclear countries?
                1. +1
                  24 October 2022 19: 50
                  Quote: DenVB
                  Yes. I grow my own potatoes.

                  and grow a lot?
                  at what I don’t think that you do plowing and hilling by hand, at best you dug, weeded and dug
                  Quote: DenVB

                  So where will food go in non-nuclear countries?

                  according to your upper statement that you plant potatoes yourself, I can say that you are not very in the subject, first of all you will not have oil, which means fuel, you will not have chemistry and fertilizers, you will not have TRANSPORT.
                  ps don’t tell anyone else about the potatoes that you plant yourself, those who know will LAUGH
                  ps 1 remember how many screams there were when there was no grain from Ukraine, and it is far from the main supplier
                  1. 0
                    24 October 2022 19: 58
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    and grow a lot?

                    Enough for a family.

                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    first of all, you will not have oil, which means fuel

                    What do I have to do with it? I'm asking you about countries that have not been subjected to nuclear strikes. Oil is produced in many places besides the USA and Russia.

                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    you will not have chemicals and fertilizers

                    Fertilizers are also mined and made not only in Russia.

                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    don’t tell anyone else about the potatoes that you plant yourself, those who know will LAUGH

                    Well, laugh. Although I don't know what's funny about it.

                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    at what I don’t think that you do plowing and hilling manually

                    "Plowing" (more precisely, cultivation) is not manual. The rest is manual. You can also dig by hand, not such a great job.
                    1. +1
                      24 October 2022 21: 27
                      Quote: DenVB
                      "Plowing" (more precisely, cultivation) is not manual. The rest is manual. You can also dig by hand, not such a great job.

                      exactly until you start plowing
                      Quote: DenVB
                      Although I don't know what's funny about it.

                      stupidity is always funny
                      Quote: DenVB
                      Fertilizers are also mined and made not only in Russia.

                      well, yes, yes, maybe in Spain and France, for the sake of interest, look at the shares of fertilizer production
                      Quote: DenVB
                      I'm asking you about countries that have not been subjected to nuclear strikes. Oil is produced in many places besides the USA and Russia.

                      I completely forgot about the great oil-producing countries - Spain, France, Italy and Holland
                      Quote: DenVB
                      Enough for a family.

                      that is, about nothing, and there is enough for your family exactly as long as you don’t live on one potato
                      1. -1
                        24 October 2022 21: 53
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        exactly until you start plowing

                        Do not plow by hand, but dig. I dig the beds regularly. There is nothing terrible in this. If you need to dig a lot, I’ll take a miracle shovel from a neighbor.

                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        stupidity is always funny

                        This is what you wrote very well.

                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        well, yes, yes, maybe in Spain and France, for the sake of interest, look at the shares of fertilizer production

                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        I completely forgot about the great oil-producing countries - Spain, France, Italy and Holland

                        Do you know other countries besides Spain and France? Saudi Arabia, for example? Or Canada?

                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, about nothing, and there is enough for your family exactly as long as you don’t live on one potato

                        I have already asked you, but apparently you do not even understand what I am asking you about. Let me try again: how will me and my potatoes lead to the disappearance of food in countries that will not be subjected to nuclear strikes?
                        1. 0
                          24 October 2022 22: 32
                          Quote: DenVB
                          Saudi Arabia, for example? Or Canada?

                          and Saudi Arabia is a great food producer, after the statement about Canada, it’s clear that there’s no point in even debating with you, you don’t know anything on the topic at all, go ahead for the miracle of a shovel
                          Quote: DenVB
                          me and my potatoes how will lead to the disappearance of food in countries that are not subject to nuclear strikes?

                          who will not be exposed?!
                          Africa?
                          so these parasites will die in a week
                          Arabs, they will clash with the Jews under the guise
                          Europe?!!!
                          so she will get it in the wash, don’t indulge, you alone with a miracle shovel and stay to eat two bags of potatoes
                        2. -2
                          24 October 2022 22: 39
                          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                          and Saudi Arabia is a great food producer, after the statement about Canada, it’s clear that there’s no point in even debating with you, you don’t know anything on the topic at all

                          On the topic of delusional generation, it is not clear what I really know nothing about. But at least I know how to plant potatoes.
        2. +2
          24 October 2022 21: 26
          DenVBto be left without a harvest and a nuclear autumn is enough. Winter is not required at all.
          1. -2
            24 October 2022 21: 55
            Quote: MBRBS
            DenVB to be left without a harvest and a nuclear autumn is enough. Winter is not required at all.

            What is nuclear autumn? Who exactly will be left without a crop?
            1. 0
              24 October 2022 22: 41
              a decrease in the average annual temperature by only a few degrees (radial autumn) will not allow grain crops to ripen. And not only grains. As a result - hunger throughout the ball.
              1. -1
                24 October 2022 22: 50
                Quote: MBRBS
                a decrease in the average annual temperature by only a few degrees (severe autumn)

                Again a hypothesis. To lower the temperature on the planet by a few degrees - you have to try very hard.
      3. +2
        24 October 2022 18: 03
        Will she really come? How many times was it tested in field experiments? The eruption of Klyuchevskoy Sopka is akin to several dozen nuclear charges in terms of the release of energy and ash. Something is not strongly felt.
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 21: 36
          mongolian9999, in volcanoes the ash is heavy, quickly falls to the ground. Another thing is small particles of soot (radioactive!), which will come from massive fires and will be carried hundreds of kilometers.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 22: 52
            Quote: MBRBS
            Another thing is small particles of soot (radioactive!), which will come from massive fires and will be carried hundreds of kilometers.

            Last year, we burned 18 million hectares of forest. How much more massive?
            1. +1
              24 October 2022 23: 47
              bullshit, Russia has 800 million hectares of forest. And not only the forest will burn, and not only in Russia. So all the oxygen in the atmosphere can burn out.
              1. -1
                24 October 2022 23: 58
                Quote: MBRBS
                And not only the forest will burn, and not only in Russia.

                What will be on fire? Right now, drop a vigorous bomb on the forest - it will not catch fire. Damp.

                Quote: MBRBS
                So all the oxygen in the atmosphere can burn out.

                But this is a fresh idea. Did not met.
                1. -1
                  25 October 2022 00: 10
                  Quote: DenVB
                  What will be on fire? Right now, drop a vigorous bomb on the forest - it will not catch fire. damp

                  Vv is now much closer to the truth on the topic "set fire to a tank by splashing solarium."

                  Continue in the same direction and the truth will be revealed to you Yes
                  1. -2
                    25 October 2022 00: 23
                    Quote: Repellent
                    Vv is now much closer to the truth on the topic "set fire to a tank by splashing solarium."

                    Aren't you tired of running through the comments and demonstrating? You have already demonstrated. More than frankly.

                    However, it's up to you...
                    1. -3
                      25 October 2022 00: 55
                      Quote: DenVB
                      Aren't you tired of running through the comments and demonstrating? You have already demonstrated. more than frankly

                      This is your vision of the situation, nothing more.

                      However ... an autopsy will show Yes
                      1. -1
                        25 October 2022 01: 16
                        Quote: Repellent
                        This is your vision of the situation, nothing more.

                        No, if it excites you - to your health.
                        1. 0
                          25 October 2022 01: 31
                          Quote: DenVB
                          if it bothers you

                          Not at all.

                          You have done everything to be noticeable. Your choice, no one captive request
                        2. -1
                          25 October 2022 01: 46
                          Quote: Repellent
                          You have done everything to be noticeable.

                          Do I have a fan club? It's so cute.
                        3. 0
                          25 October 2022 01: 57
                          Quote: DenVB
                          Do I have a fan club? It's so cute

                          Hasn't appeared yet. But I think you'll like it. good luck on the road Yes
      4. 0
        27 October 2022 23: 32
        There will be no "nuclear winter", you were simply intimidated.
    7. +4
      24 October 2022 16: 53
      states not taking part in the conflict will not suffer.

      Will not suffer from the primary factors listed by the author. But winds, including stratospheric ones, will carry radioactive dust, ash and fallout across the Earth. In this, whoever is lucky, can be especially lucky in the southern hemisphere. But the secondary factor dust and ash will lead to a cooling on the entire Earth and at least crop failures for several years or even decades. Volcanic explosions with ash emissions previously caused a cooling effect.
      1. 0
        27 October 2022 23: 41
        Well, let's get back to normal, because now it's one and a half degrees higher than normal, Greta won't let me lie! laughing laughing
    8. +4
      24 October 2022 17: 17
      What kind of nonsense, if Russia and Sasha exchange nuclear successes, do you think the rest will stay on the sidelines? India and Pakistan will immediately begin to endure each other, Kim will hit on Japan and Seoul, Israel on Iran, in short, everyone will get it, I think Australia is the same, well, maybe Africa no one will touch)
      1. +1
        25 October 2022 17: 47
        What kind of nonsense, if Russia and Sasha exchange nuclear successes, do you think the rest will stay on the sidelines? India and Pakistan will immediately begin to endure each other, Kim will hit on Japan and Seoul, Israel on Iran, in short, everyone will get it, I think Australia is the same, well, maybe Africa no one will touch)

        Yes. Like at a drunk country wedding. The two started a fight. Others started screaming / tearing apart and also grabbed it. Further rushed in breadth. But there are always quiet people who step back and chuckle, looking at the whole batch. You can even guess what it will be a monkey.
    9. +5
      24 October 2022 17: 28
      At a distance of about 20 km from the epicenter, everything in its path will literally be “demolished” by a blast wave,

      Che is a shitty expert. The radius of complete destruction at 1 mt is 4 km.
      And what about a microwave?
      1. +1
        24 October 2022 18: 05
        Apparently he meant em-pulse. But the desire to designate everything in everyday language ...
      2. +1
        24 October 2022 20: 35
        Quote: bk316
        Che is a shitty expert.

        This expert is not even in the subject of how we plan to deal with the aggressor! The WFP said that they would simply DIE, they would not even have time to repent!
        But d.v.s. retired cap1r K. Sivkov openly stated that after the impact of 10-30 Mt SBP SARMAT ICBMs on the Yellowstone caldera, there will be no living place from the SGA: everything will be covered with a 20 cm layer of volcanic ash (volcanic glass - Obsidian). Well, and those who hide in underground bunkers, like rats in a shipwreck, will choke when a tsunami passes from the detonation of a 100 Mt PNA STATUS-6 charge on both sides of the SGA. In addition, cobalt water will saturate the entire area and create an unacceptable r / a background for many decades to come ... And this is even though the entire leadership of the country and the Armed Forces will die from a preventive strike. There is a PERIMETER (Dead Hand) system, it will get them in the next world !!!
        And these wretched think that we will play with them!!!
        Maybe in the forests of the Amazon one of the natives will survive ... But what kind of life will it be? Probably at the level of the primitive communal system, or the early Middle Ages - no more.
        IMHO.
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 20: 48
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Maybe in the forests of the Amazon one of the natives will survive ... But what kind of life will it be? Probably at the level of the primitive communal system, or the early Middle Ages - no more

          Boa, hello hi

          It won't happen if it's reasonable. Everyone wants to live, this is the alphabet Yes
    10. -5
      24 October 2022 17: 32
      They are preparing the people, they are preparing ... as Simonyan blabbed out - they can gasp in Ukraine ...
      They gasp tactically, and they will announce - rejoice that they didn’t gasp in defense of the country strategically ...
      1. +2
        25 October 2022 19: 32
        A simple question, excuse me, but why, what is the point of us infecting our own territories (sooner or later it will be so)? Now conventional weapons are in no way inferior to tactical nuclear weapons in terms of fire damage, and surpass them in many parameters and efficiency. What is the point of the Russian Federation to use nuclear weapons before an offensive, and the troops are not ready to conduct military operations in such conditions, and even with negative political consequences?
        1. 0
          25 October 2022 21: 48
          The meaning will be explained later. Explain what - out, a lot of people are busy with this.

          But for now, the most important point is to scare everyone on preferences.
          Okay, Simonyan, but how everyone picked up the discussion! - means, for good reason. The order was given to throw in the idea.
    11. +2
      24 October 2022 17: 33
      I live near the industrial zone of Ufa. Since childhood, I know where and how many will arrive and what are the chances. I know firsthand the state of "optimized" shelters for civilians, no matter how many there are for the "chosen ones". I am happy that my family and I will be at the epicenter... Why do I have such a desire? Because the Soviet authorities explained to me in detail and competently in my childhood what was the priority of an attack on Ufa and in detail what would happen to me if a nuclear weapon was struck. MY native government told me everything, and which now hinted that I would go to heaven, this is actually all of its competence
      1. +2
        24 October 2022 20: 45
        Quote: lubesky
        Since childhood, I know where and how many will arrive and what are the chances

        Stop panicking already. Until it arrives - your speech is about nothing. When he arrives, there will be no one to read. And nowhere.

        Dixi
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 23: 08
          Quote: Repellent
          Quote: lubesky
          Since childhood, I know where and how many will arrive and what are the chances

          Stop panicking already. Until it arrives - your speech is about nothing. When he arrives, there will be no one to read. And nowhere.

          Dixi

          Was the USSR alarmist? No need to tell me how and where to express my opinion and no one will tell you where to go hi
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 23: 21
            Quote: lubesky
            no one will tell you where to go

            Tired of telling me where to go. Careful.

            Quote: lubesky
            Was the USSR alarmist?

            I myself am from the USSR, from there and some, ahem, fatalism: either alive or not. This is deeply personal, I do not recommend touching it.
            1. 0
              25 October 2022 10: 55
              Quote: Repellent
              Tired of telling me where to go. Careful.

              you will get tired of telling me how and where to express my opinion. Even more careful.
              Regarding the "speech", a lover of foreign words - indicate who and where, used your texts as a speechwriter, so that I would be overwhelmed by the authority of the speaker of your texts and really be more accurate and deeply aware that supposedly my "speech" according to your words was really nothing about what.
            2. 0
              25 October 2022 10: 57
              Quote: Repellent
              touch - do not recommend

              where did you actually get that you can tell me/recommend/stop/evaluate and so on. You obviously have high self esteem. Go ahead, my comment. (as you can see, in order not to "get tired" you indicate the place of your new deployment - I just sent you further and was not tired at all)
      2. 0
        25 October 2022 17: 55
        Because the Soviet authorities explained in detail and competently to me in childhood what priority the strike on Ufa

        Sometimes the thought comes that the priorities of the first and second nuclear strikes have been revised. For chemical production and other large-scale production will stop on their own if communications, energy, communications, finance, government are destroyed for a long time.
        1. 0
          25 October 2022 18: 20
          Quote: Former soldier
          large productions will stop themselves

          you are right colleague, again, the COMPETENT Soviet government duplicated workshops and entire thermal power plants under our factories, to work even in extremely unfavorable conditions. How now with this - I don’t know, maybe they also optimized it ...
    12. +1
      24 October 2022 18: 55
      The worst thing that can happen in JV is Anarakhia in conditions of terrible overpopulation, along with the destruction of infrastructure facilities and chemical enterprises. People will die in batches and bring down each other as well. The conflict from the outside will instantly become internal, aggravated by hitherto unknown ecological hardcore. Large-scale fires, chemical releases into the water and atmosphere, missed sowing campaigns, lack of clean water and organized sewerage for millions of people (= unprecedented scale of epidemics), destruction of technological support for the law enforcement system - all this and much more.
      Oh yes, climate disruption - imagine how much CO2 and soot will be released into the atmosphere in a short period, how much volatile compounds will be from burning plastics, heavy metals, how many rats and fleas will breed, how many rivers and lakes will be poisoned, how much of this will also poison aquifers , making a lot of springs (where they still remain after that) unusable.

      In general, it will be fun, very, very much. The living envy the dead.
      We all rarely think about what a hefty hook Civilization is sitting on. If this hook is removed, the nuclear flame will seem one of the problems, and not the main one ..
      1. 0
        24 October 2022 19: 06
        Quote: Knell Wardenheart
        In general, it will be fun, very, very much. The living envy the dead

        You would be the authors of the post-apocalypse. On flibust, for example, there is a whole section for them.
    13. 0
      24 October 2022 20: 37
      the expert stressed ... that states not taking part in the conflict would not be harmed.

      Yah? In the trash of such an expert! R / a infection and nuclear autumn for a year or two has not been canceled!
      the expert described a likely scenario for a 1-Mt nuclear missile strike on a million-plus city.

      We have only 16 million-plus cities, and they will not spare charges for them. For each - at least 6 warheads of 150-300 kT. (1 Mt is no longer in service) Once again - ekperda in the trash!
    14. 0
      24 October 2022 23: 34
      We won't live. In the Czech Republic, we built shelters for civil defense. The Red Cross worked actively and a high-quality civil defense was simply built. The army was trained for this occasion. Today? The shelters have been sold, there are warehouses, bars, in case of an attack, people do not know what to do. I don't want to survive. We have a historical crematorium in the city, I think there will be a lot of work in it. am
      Čechy, vše je zničeno.
      1. 0
        24 October 2022 23: 40
        Quote: Altmann
        Čechy, vše je zničeno

        Why did you decide so? you can't do that... I wouldn't
      2. +1
        25 October 2022 19: 23
        Questions not to the Russian Federation, but to your new metropolis overseas. You wanted "freedom" (when in the 80s I was called an occupier 2-3 times a week) you "got" it, only a new owner instead of "bad Soviets" that thumped huge funds into your development, tearing you away from yourself, returns you to last century
    15. +1
      25 October 2022 13: 17
      A simple question, a simple layman. Why not destroy, together with the personnel, all research institutes and manufacturing enterprises engaged in the development and manufacture of this type of charge? Israel, at one time, without any long conversations and discussions, without "clucking and flapping its wings", destroyed 2 research institutes and reactors in Iraq and Syria, instantly closing the topic and threats. Have we already reached such a stage of helplessness and dependence on external opinion that we are unable to quickly and permanently eliminate promising and real threats of this order? But what about at least the obligation to fulfill the guarantor for the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons, if the fate of one's own state worries less than the image of its neighbors, etc.? enemies. They did not even hesitate to humiliate themselves and disgrace themselves to the whole world, turning across the ocean to the metropolis and their lackeys, who themselves organized this, saying that your little rat offends me, do something. Some kind of incomprehensible impression is being formed from all this, a very bad one, I would still like to have a better opinion about my own leadership class and prospects, but it is very similar to 1916, with all the prospects of that time.
      1. 0
        25 October 2022 18: 06
        Israel, at one time, without any long conversations and discussions, without "clucking and flapping its wings", destroyed 2 research institutes and reactors in Iraq and Syria, instantly closing the topic and threats.

        You are silent that Israel is in a special position under the wing of the United States and much is forgiven to it. In the case of even a hint of similar actions by other countries, sanctions are announced to them.
    16. +3
      25 October 2022 17: 56
      Quote: ALARI
      The charges will not be nuclear, but thermonuclear, and they are much cleaner.

      The damaging factors for the two types of weapons are the same. The fusion reaction itself does not contribute to radioactive fallout. But it is initiated by a nuclear explosive device, which is "dirty". Therefore, a hydrogen bomb generates no less fallout than a conventional nuclear bomb.
    17. +1
      25 October 2022 19: 16
      Quote: Former soldier
      In the case of even a hint of similar actions by other countries, sanctions are announced to them.

      Eee...? In what fatal way will the 10th sanction from overseas affect your personal life? By the way, Israel destroyed a similar threat in Syria in the same way, without shouting and noise, without "hand-wringing" and appealing to the world community. For the first and second strikes and the elimination of the threat, even in the future, he was subjected to critical sanctions (google) from the same amers and the UN that he wanted to spit on, ensuring his security, and this with total dependence on external supplies. Of course, if you are worried about your villa in Miami or LB, then I sympathize with your loss.
    18. 0
      27 October 2022 23: 27
      "microwave effect"
      There is no such effect, the "expert" thinks up. And the radius of destruction is increased by a factor of three.
    19. 0
      30 October 2022 22: 40
      This is not nonsense, this is just a warning, many do not believe, but I believe that one side, or rather both, will use nuclear weapons and destroy each other. I believe in evil, but I hope for a clear human mind, and when it happens, I want to be in the epicenter of the explosion, I want to end this as soon as possible, I don’t want to cut myself. am

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"