Fuel depot with over 100 tons of aviation fuel destroyed in Cherkasy region - Ministry of Defense

119
Fuel depot with over 100 tons of aviation fuel destroyed in Cherkasy region - Ministry of Defense

The Russian Armed Forces continue to strike with precision weapons on military command and energy systems of Ukraine, the past XNUMX hours were no exception. According to a new report, all assigned targets were hit.

Last Saturday was for Ukraine another day of massive missile strikes on critical targets, half of the Ukrainian regions were under attack, in the other there were problems with the supply of electricity, communications and the Internet. At night, the attacks continued, the second or third wave went drones-kamikaze. As a number of Russian resources reported in the morning, a number of substations providing rail traffic in Ukraine were knocked out during the day.



Positional battles are going on on the line of contact, the enemy is making attempts to break through the defenses of the Russian troops both in the southern and northern directions, but all attacks were repelled. In directions: on the Kupyansky Armed Forces of Ukraine, an attempt was made to attack in the direction of Kuzemovka and Berestovoe, but to no avail. Having suffered losses, the enemy retreated. At Krasnolimansky, an attempt was made to attack with a reinforced motorized infantry battalion in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbNovosadovoye and Torsky forestry. The advancing units were covered by artillery and aviation, about 70 military personnel, three infantry fighting vehicles, seven armored personnel carriers and three pickup trucks were destroyed. In Yuzhno-Donetsk, the enemy forces of two company tactical groups, reinforced tanks, made an attempt to break through in the direction of Novomikhailovka, Nikolsky and Glorious, but ran into an artillery strike. Losses - more than 40 Ukrainian servicemen, seven armored combat vehicles and four vehicles.

On the Nikolaev-Krivoy Rog direction, the attacks were carried out in the direction of the settlement. Bruskinskoye, Pyatikhatki, Koshara, Sukhanovo and Ishchenka of the Kherson region. All attacks were repulsed, more than 90 Ukrainian servicemen, three tanks, eight armored fighting vehicles were destroyed.

During the day, artillery, aviation and missile fire destroyed: five ammunition depots, an oil storage facility with diesel fuel, as well as a fuel depot, which stored more than 100 tons of aviation fuel for the Ukrainian air forces.

Air defense systems shot down 15 Ukrainian drones, six HIMARS MLRS and one HARM anti-radar missile.

119 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    23 October 2022 16: 11
    In the Cherkasy region, a fuel depot was destroyed, where over 100 thousand tons aviation fuel - Ministry of Defense
    But this is just wonderful. Let the flyers walk ......
    1. +28
      23 October 2022 16: 14
      Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?
      1. +17
        23 October 2022 16: 16
        "Partners" supplied fuel to Kukuev! The infrastructure is still working!
        1. +14
          23 October 2022 16: 38
          Quote: SaLaR
          Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?

          The second question is why they didn’t get there earlier. 100 thousand tons will not be delivered in one week. And they not only drove there, but also took it from there for sure.
          Fuel depots with power plants are a higher priority than ammunition depots
          1. +1
            23 October 2022 18: 24
            Quote: Repellent
            Quote: lis-ik
            Quote: SaLaR
            Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?

            It’s clear where. The guarantor’s friends work in detours.

            If a neighbor leaked on you, this is definitely "friends of the guarantor."

            Keep watching Yes

            Treason to the Motherland. But so as not to be shot. The pier did not think were not covered in time.
          2. +7
            23 October 2022 18: 47
            So that's good. Pretend that we do not know about this warehouse, let the enemy bring a lot of fuel there, and then destroy it in one fell swoop.
            This is better than scaring off the enemy, and then looking for where he hides new warehouses.
          3. +3
            23 October 2022 21: 47
            Quote: Shurik70
            why didn’t they get there earlier

            Again not so. Well, we waited until all the containers were filled. Why destroy each barrel separately?
          4. +1
            24 October 2022 09: 51
            Well, look, if you hit an empty mega-barrel - well, how will it reach and build a thousand small ones.
            Or take another.

            And so they drove, drove, and it ended abruptly.
      2. +4
        23 October 2022 16: 32
        And where did it come from, where does it go?
        1. +1
          23 October 2022 16: 41
          Quote: stels_07
          And where did it come from, where does it go?

          "And Schaub Bulo!" And what if the "partners" still have planes? Or they themselves will fly in to save the poor Ukrainians. Or a reserve in case of a drape.
          1. +2
            23 October 2022 21: 10
            Quote: Egoza
            "And Schaub Bulo!" And what if the "partners" still have planes? Or they themselves will fly in to save the poor Ukrainians. Or a reserve in case of a drape.

            Yeah, a magician will fly to them in a "blue" helicopter, and show a movie "for free"! Das is fantastic! wassat
      3. 0
        23 October 2022 17: 37
        Quote: SaLaR
        Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?

        It’s clear where. The guarantor’s friends work in detours.
        1. +2
          23 October 2022 17: 57
          Quote: lis-ik
          Quote: SaLaR
          Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?

          It’s clear where. The guarantor’s friends work in detours.

          If a neighbor leaked on you, this is definitely "friends of the guarantor."

          Keep watching Yes
      4. +3
        23 October 2022 19: 52
        Question: where did the fuel come from?
        yes - an interesting question - where does all sorts of fuel still come from in Ukraine, where it has been going on for 8 months?
        During the day, artillery, aviation and missile fire destroyed: five ammunition depots, an oil storage facility with diesel fuel, as well as a fuel depot, which stored more than 100 tons of aviation fuel for the air forces of Ukraine
        If we assume that the weight of the fuel in the SU-24 is about 8 tons, then 100000 : 8 = 12000 times the aircraft will not be able to refuel with aviation kerosene ...? Is there any knowledgeable people here who can tell if I did the calculations correctly or not? 12 thousand filling stations for SU-24 aircraft... Ukronazis are completely fools to store such a volume of aviation kerosene in one place?! Or is it again here that the next hat throwers are hanging noodles on our ears?
        1. +1
          24 October 2022 09: 53
          Well, it is also military transport (hell knows if there is now civil) aviation, helicopters (gluttonous).
    2. +2
      23 October 2022 16: 21
      Did our MO accidentally make a mistake again by zero? Why does the country need so much fuel in one place when there are a maximum of 50 aircraft left?
      1. +16
        23 October 2022 16: 44
        Quote: ASAD
        Did our MO accidentally make a mistake again by zero? Why does the country need so much fuel in one place when there are a maximum of 50 aircraft left?

        Three tape recorders, three foreign film cameras, three domestic cigarette cases, a suede jacket... three...
        1. +2
          23 October 2022 17: 58
          283*. How many railway tanks will be required to transport 1000 tons of oil if the capacity of each tank is 50 m3?
          № 283.
          Given:m=1000t=1000000kg
          V=50m³
          P=800kg/m³
          N-?

          Answer from the textbook (task book): 283*. 25 tanks.
          1. +2
            23 October 2022 18: 28
            Oil refineries in Ukraine do not work. Fuel comes from Romania. There are deposits there. And the British pay for them. Delivery method through Northern Bukovina or Moldova.
        2. +2
          23 October 2022 23: 31
          Write more, what is it, the fuel of the adversary to regret, or what?
      2. 0
        23 October 2022 18: 26
        Kerosene is a useful thing in the household, lamps, kerosene gases ... Electricity is yok. And caracine is now also in short supply laughing
      3. 0
        23 October 2022 19: 23
        Quote: ASAD
        Did our MO accidentally make a mistake again by zero? Why does the country need so much fuel in one place when there are a maximum of 50 aircraft left?

        And we will soon find out - it will burn for a week and the smoky trail for hundreds of kilometers, downwind, from satellites will be visible ... recourse
      4. 0
        23 October 2022 21: 54
        Quote: ASAD
        Why does the country need so much fuel in one place when there are a maximum of 50 aircraft left?

        Helicopters also fly on kerosene. And it is not known how many years it was kept there.
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 09: 55
          Quote: Piramidon
          And it is not known how many years it was kept there.

          Really rare from the USSR? belay
          And by the way, it is very likely that it hurts "bohato" for the skanuns who now live there.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 12: 56
            Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
            Really rare from the USSR?

            Even after the USSR, these 100 thousand tons could be dragged in buckets in 30 years. laughing
            1. 0
              24 October 2022 14: 24
              AFTER - these 100 thousand tons would be pulled out in buckets. wassat
              And they would say sho and Bulo.

              Apparently they left so much that they did not have time to scoop out. laughing
            2. 0
              25 October 2022 10: 23
              Quote: Piramidon
              these 100 thousand tons could be dragged in buckets in 30 years.

              Rather, spread out. This is also possible faster.
              And as for "training", it's not clear about whom, but definitely not about Ukraine ..
      5. +3
        24 October 2022 12: 25
        Did our MO accidentally make a mistake again by zero?

        Probably wrong. Served in the Aviation Fuel Service. There were about 30* 50m3=1500m3 in the main warehouse. Somehow they were also delivered to some reserve warehouse, and there probably were capacities of a maximum of 100 * 50m3 = 5000m100000. And 50:2000=5000 tanks, when I was in service, fuel was stored on these, and this is a huge territory. Or they destroyed the fuel that was stored in the RVS-10000, or RVS-XNUMX, or even more, and you cannot hide such a warehouse - therefore, the figure announced in the article is doubtful ...
    3. +2
      23 October 2022 16: 24
      The video that appeared on the network shows how "305" flies with high accuracy through the window of a building with Ukrainian military equipment. During the flight, the speech of the operator of the missile system is heard, who informs his partner that he will hit the target "through the window". Video link below.

      Destruction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine settled in the building by the "eyes" of the rocket: the latest "Product 305" flies through the window of the enemy.


      https://t.me/rusich_army/5932

      . The missile can be launched in telecontrol mode, when the launch is carried out out of sight of the target according to the transmitted coordinates. When approaching the target, the homing head turns on and transmits the image to the weapon operator's screen in the helicopter's cockpit. The pilot then aims the ammunition at the object.
      "Izdeliye-305" can also be used in the "fire-and-forget" mode, when the target is captured by the optoelectronic homing head of the missile. The range of the LMUR is up to 14,5 kilometers, the weight is 105 kilograms, the high-explosive fragmentation warhead is 25 kilograms.

      https://rg.ru/2022/10/23/cherez-okno-poiavilis-kadry-primeneniia-na-ukraine-izdeliia-305.html

      According to Ukrainian sources, the IRIS-T SLM air defense systems were tested both on cruise missiles and on unmanned aerial vehicles, however, their effectiveness turned out to be only slightly above average - about 60%, although it was assumed that the complexes were capable of hitting targets with a probability of up to 85% .
      .Ukraine has run out of missiles for the delivered German IRIS-T air defense.Ukraine has used up 75% of the missiles for the IRIS-T anti-aircraft missile system delivered to Ukraine this week.


      According to a number of data, in total, Germany provided Ukraine with 48 anti-aircraft guided missiles for one of the supplied air defense systems, however, about 40 of them have already been used up.

      https://avia.pro/news/ukraina-izrashodovala-75-raket-dlya-zrk-iris-t-zayaviv-o-sredney-effektivnosti-nemeckoy-pvo
      1. +10
        23 October 2022 16: 48
        Quote from: neworange88
        Destruction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine settled in the building by the "eyes" of the rocket: the latest "Product 305" flies through the window of the enemy.
        https://t.me/rusich_army/5932

        I found this video from your YouTube link. Here it is.

        Destruction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine settled in the building by the "eyes" of the rocket: the latest "Product 305" flies through the window of the enemy.
    4. +4
      23 October 2022 16: 29
      More than a hundred thousand tons, how much exactly, half a million tons? How many fuel tanks were there, why were they not destroyed before? How was such an amount of fuel concentrated in one place? This is an excellent goal! This storage was not guarded from the air? than the fuel in those tanks was!
      1. -4
        23 October 2022 16: 54
        They set it up, they destroyed it themselves. But the money was transferred. If they hadn't been intercepted, they wouldn't have destroyed it.
        1. -3
          23 October 2022 17: 39
          Quote: zenion
          They set it up, they destroyed it themselves. But the money was transferred. If they hadn't been intercepted, they wouldn't have destroyed it.

          Exactly.
          1. -2
            23 October 2022 17: 49
            Quote: lis-ik
            Quote: zenion
            ... the money was transferred. If they hadn't been intercepted, they wouldn't have destroyed it.

            Exactly.

            Trader. From you rushing it negative
        2. 0
          25 October 2022 10: 28
          Quote: zenion
          But the money was transferred. If they hadn't been intercepted, they wouldn't have destroyed it.

          What if they refused to pay?
      2. +2
        23 October 2022 17: 54
        Well, to understand the issue, 100 thousand tons is not very much. These are two or three large reservoirs. Yes, usually they are not filled to capacity, so rather three or four. This is approximately 30-35 trains. And about 15-20 days for pumping from tanks to tanks. But still very good news.
        1. +3
          23 October 2022 20: 45
          To understand the issue, this is 1667 railway tanks.
          Just imagine it. Why does the Armed Forces of Ukraine need so much aviation kerosene?
          Even before the war?
          Or it was a fuel depot for civil aircraft, it's amazing why it was not covered earlier.
          But there is an assumption that here the MO made a mistake by a couple of orders of magnitude. So to speak. 1000 tons of kerosene could be, which is also not a little. And perhaps in general 100 thousand liters / kg of kerosene, which, relatively speaking, is 100 tons ...
      3. -1
        23 October 2022 18: 30
        Quote: Thrifty
        More than a hundred thousand tons, how much exactly, half a million tons? How many fuel tanks were there, why were they not destroyed before? How was such an amount of fuel concentrated in one place? This is an excellent goal! This storage was not guarded from the air? than the fuel in those tanks was!


        So this is a big goal for which they delayed working out for a long time, and how many similar goals are smaller and do not work on them.
        Cheating brother. Treason!
      4. +4
        23 October 2022 19: 07
        10 containers of 10000 tons. And these are such giants
        Overall dimensions of the tank 10000 m3:
        wall - diameter 34 m; height 12 m / diameter 28,5 m; height 17,88 m
        very hard to ignore.
      5. +1
        24 October 2022 14: 47
        There are more questions than there were fuel in those tanks!

        Of course, they didn’t destroy badly, they destroyed horror in general. Thrifty all-propalshchik in all its glory.
    5. +8
      23 October 2022 16: 33
      Summarizing the ongoing two-week shelling of important military installations and critical infrastructure on the territory of the former. The Ukrainian SSR, the lack of success of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front and the problems that have arisen in the rear of the civilian population, we have to admit that the Kyiv junta and, most importantly, its owners are now looking for a non-trivial way out of the current situation in the fields of the NVO.
      So it is worth waiting for such meanness from the Anglo-Saxons and their Kyiv "partners", which would overshadow all world problems and would not leave the strips of all world media at least until the spring of next year.
      We need to seriously prepare for the worst.
      1. 0
        23 October 2022 17: 49
        So already Shoigu warned the English Minister of Defense that the Bandera people were preparing a "dirty" bomb. Looks like it's been imported from the UK.
      2. 0
        23 October 2022 18: 32
        There, Erdogan has constant verbal diarrhea, he just can’t eat, how to talk hunting, that’s the whole move for you.
    6. 0
      23 October 2022 17: 16
      Not really. the following night, with even greater zeal, overflights were carried out
  2. +11
    23 October 2022 16: 16
    Few! It is also necessary to find and destroy fuel depots, not only of the Armed Forces of Ukraine but also of the Ukrainian Railways, because now, with a shortage of electric energy, trains use diesel traction!
    1. +6
      23 October 2022 16: 26
      It is necessary to destroy the depot, equipment points. Without diesel fuel, water and sand, a diesel locomotive is a pile of iron
      1. +3
        23 October 2022 16: 29
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Without diesel fuel, water and sand locomotive-heap of iron

        forgive my ignorance, but why does a diesel locomotive need sand ???
        1. +12
          23 October 2022 16: 49
          in order not to slip on the ups and not to slip on the descents, and you need a lot of sand
        2. +3
          23 October 2022 16: 50
          Should carry something, empty why drive.
        3. +2
          23 October 2022 16: 57
          Sprinkle on the road and slow down. So short that they didn't understand. Now it is OK?
        4. +1
          23 October 2022 17: 33
          Increases the grip weight of the locomotive and makes it possible to drive heavier trains.
    2. -2
      23 October 2022 17: 17
      here's a little bit on the location and did not hold out
  3. +3
    23 October 2022 16: 19
    Normal, well done! This is how to spud them every day!
  4. 0
    23 October 2022 16: 19
    the enemy is making attempts to break through the defenses of the Russian troops both in the southern and northern directions, but all attacks were repulsed.
    Well, that's another question. Judging by the losses of the enemy, this is all a search for a weak spot to strike.
    about 70 military personnel, three infantry fighting vehicles, seven armored personnel carriers and three pickup trucks were destroyed.
    Losses - more than 40 Ukrainian servicemen, seven armored combat vehicles and four vehicles.
    All attacks were repulsed, more than 90 Ukrainian servicemen, three tanks, eight armored fighting vehicles were destroyed.
    More modest. feel
    1. +2
      23 October 2022 17: 50
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Judging by the losses of the enemy, this is all a search for a weak spot to strike.


      the search for an enemy’s weak point is when no more than a few days are spent searching for this weak point. And the search for a weak point for 3 weeks, while in these three weeks the daily losses of only more than 200 people killed are similar to the suicide attempts of a hardened suicide. Losing at least a week killed 1400 people, while not moving anywhere, only Ukraine can.
      And by the way, what is happening is the best confirmation that there is no Ukrainian army of 700 thousand at all, I think all the Armed Forces of Ukraine have a maximum of 500 thousand, and even this number was on the eve of the start of their counteroffensive in early September, and now it is already less.
  5. +3
    23 October 2022 16: 29
    Cherkasy region now have an idea of ​​how a 100-thousander tanker with aviation fuel explodes.
    1. 0
      23 October 2022 16: 35
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Cherkasy region now have an idea of ​​how a 100-thousander tanker with aviation fuel explodes.

      Here it is landed! Now let them ask for both fuel and planes with helicopters.
    2. -3
      23 October 2022 17: 10
      In one tank, no more than 2 thousand tons. Oil depots are built according to strict standards. Fifty tanks require dozens of missiles. So, they screwed up. I no longer pay attention to the nonsense from the Ministry of Defense.
      1. +3
        23 October 2022 17: 24
        Is a cluster warhead not an option? bully
      2. +5
        23 October 2022 17: 38
        In one tank no more than 2 thousand tons

        That is, you have never heard about five-thousanders for oil products (at oil depots)?
        Tank farms are built according to strict standards

        Can you share these rules? And separately - for kerosene storage facilities for jet fuel. By the way, there are tanks of 50 thousand tons each.
        1. +3
          23 October 2022 22: 19
          Quote: Ermak_Timofeich
          That is, you have never heard about five-thousanders for oil products (at oil depots)?

          Five thousandths is a trifle. Tanks can be up to 120 cubic meters. Well, how much it will be in tons depends on the density of the fuel. With an average density of kerosene of 000 g / cm³, about 0,8 tons will fit into ONE of this.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 10: 02
            I'm taking it - even if it's a skyscraper of a billion tons.
            The main thing is that if anything, everything around is not washed away by burning fuel.
      3. 0
        23 October 2022 17: 52
        Quote: Prokop_Svinin
        So, they screwed up.


        again the cissors crawled out from all the cracks.
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 03: 39
          But vigilant vigilantes are on the alert.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 10: 45
            Quote: Prokop_Svinin
            But vigilant vigilantes are on the alert.


            you are mistaken. I am not a perpetrator and not an all-rounder, but just a realist. And no one likes realists.
          2. 0
            24 October 2022 14: 56
            In one tank, no more than 2 thousand tons.


            Again tsipsoshnik on the site.
            Go learn to write believable - you must also be able to lie.
      4. 0
        24 October 2022 14: 53
        In one tank no more than 2 thousand tons
        So, they screwed up.

        It was you who lied and your friends from 404.
        100 tons is ONE tank.

        https://neftetank.ru/technology/tipy-rezervuarov/
    3. -6
      23 October 2022 17: 31
      Yes, there is no such tanker in the world for 100 thousand tons.
      1. +1
        23 October 2022 17: 48
        In Ukraine, there may not be Afromax-class tankers for 114 tons.
      2. +4
        23 October 2022 17: 51
        The supertanker has a classification designation - ULCC (Ultra-large crude carrier). Such tankers carry more than 2 barrels of oil (more than 000 thousand tons)
        Tankers of 100 thousand tons are the most massive in the world. They usually work within the same pool.
      3. +4
        23 October 2022 17: 56
        Yes, there is no such tanker in the world for 100 thousand tons

        there is, the largest tanker was with a deadweight of 550 thousand tons, Knock Nevis.
        200-300 thousand tons are quite massively darting from the Persian Gulf
        1. +1
          23 October 2022 20: 53
          An article about the destruction of a tanker for 100000 thousand tons. Ground. Those. these hundred thousand, not in one container! Well, I admit, 10000 tons. So they destroyed 10 units, a total of one hundred thousand.
          1. 0
            24 October 2022 14: 57
            Well, I admit, 10000 tons.

            Once again, 10000 is a trifle.
            https://neftetank.ru/technology/tipy-rezervuarov/
        2. 0
          24 October 2022 10: 04
          I keep thinking, what if the Russian Federation tries to sponsor a group of lovers of the book "treasure island" with money and equipment in order to play on old torpedo boats there?
      4. +1
        23 October 2022 22: 31
        Quote: sagitovich
        Yes, there is no such tanker in the world for 100 thousand tons.

        Supertankers can carry over 300 tons of oil. And the world's largest tanker "Knock Nevis" was designed to carry 000 thousand tons.
  6. +5
    23 October 2022 16: 29
    The fuel came along the same routes along which weapons are supplied. I don’t understand the logic: we are destroying the energy structure; it seems to be correct, but this also greatly affects the civilian population, including those loyal to us, but practically has no effect on the supply of weapons. At the same time, we do not touch transport hubs, depots for "changing shoes" of railway trains, diesel locomotive depots, tunnels - everything that has a direct impact on the volume of arms supplies to idiots. Maybe this is such a long-term strategic plan? Maybe such questions from a lack of information?
    1. +4
      23 October 2022 16: 39
      Quote from asng
      Maybe this is such a long-term strategic plan? Maybe such questions from a lack of information?

      This will continue as long as there are "war" and "peace" parties. Here the party of "peace" slows everything down. It seems to her that it is still possible to agree with the "partners"! So they are beating so that "business does not suffer."
    2. Eug
      +2
      23 October 2022 16: 47
      I suspect that they provide a transport corridor to Europe for "Chinese partners", and at the same time the Russian Federation exports its few goods (despite the sanctions).
      1. +2
        23 October 2022 17: 47
        I suspect that they provide a transport corridor to Europe for "Chinese partners", and at the same time the Russian Federation exports its few goods (despite the sanctions).

        it is illogical if it were the Chinese, there is a completely loyal path through Belarus or a democratic one through the Baltic states. And it’s cheaper to rebuild it later compared to the losses that loyalty to the transport infrastructure inflicts. So it's not about the Chinese
    3. KCA
      +3
      23 October 2022 17: 09
      There is no electricity not only in the wires for electric locomotives, but also for control and signaling systems, will there be fucking traffic with completely turned off arrows and semaphores, as well as in the absence of radio communications?
    4. +2
      23 October 2022 17: 14
      In Ukraine, most of the railway traction runs on electricity. Ordinary diesel locomotives are used there only as backups and there are not many of them.
    5. -2
      23 October 2022 18: 20
      Quote from asng
      At the same time, we do not touch transport hubs, depots for "changing shoes" of railway trains, diesel locomotive depots, tunnels - everything that has a direct impact on the volume of arms supplies to idiots.


      everything that you have listed is either covered by air defense with a double reserve, or you seriously think that the West did not take care of this, or even in the event of a defeat, it can be easily restored in a matter of days.
      And in order to cover the thermal power plant and distribution substations, hundreds of air defense systems are needed, which there is nowhere to take and at the same time they cannot be quickly restored.

      Quote from asng
      I do not understand the logic: we are destroying the energy structure; seems to be correct, but it also greatly affects the civilian population, including those loyal to us


      if you are people who rejoice at every terrorist attack in Russia, and consider the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge
      consider your holiday loyal to Russia, then you will never understand anything.
    6. 0
      23 October 2022 18: 36
      Quote from asng
      The fuel came along the same routes along which weapons are supplied. I don’t understand the logic: we are destroying the energy structure; it seems to be correct, but this also greatly affects the civilian population, including those loyal to us, but practically has no effect on the supply of weapons. At the same time, we do not touch transport hubs, depots for "changing shoes" of railway trains, diesel locomotive depots, tunnels - everything that has a direct impact on the volume of arms supplies to idiots. Maybe this is such a long-term strategic plan? Maybe such questions from a lack of information?


      In parallel with fuel, weapons, military supplies, completely peaceful cargoes are transported. Everything goes in parallel for both military and civilian infrastructures. What is not clear, this is NWO and not war
    7. 0
      24 October 2022 13: 05
      Quote from asng
      The fuel came along the same routes along which weapons are supplied.

      For some reason, everyone believes that this kerosene was delivered yesterday or the day before yesterday. And if we assume that it has been stored there for many years. Perhaps, since the time when Russian-Ukrainian trade was at an accelerated pace, and this fuel was then bought from Russia.
  7. +3
    23 October 2022 16: 38
    Quote: SaLaR
    Question: Where is it from? fuel did it come from there?

    And what, we have already isolated ukrov from our neighbors? Romanians know how to distill their oil into gasoline. And their land works.
  8. +7
    23 October 2022 16: 45
    Quote from asng
    The fuel came along the same routes along which weapons are supplied. I don’t understand the logic: we are destroying the energy structure; it seems to be correct, but this also greatly affects the civilian population, including those loyal to us, but practically has no effect on the supply of weapons. At the same time, we do not touch transport hubs, depots for "changing shoes" of railway trains, diesel locomotive depots, tunnels - everything that has a direct impact on the volume of arms supplies to idiots. Maybe this is such a long-term strategic plan? Maybe such questions from a lack of information?

    You can also go over the bridge. And at a major railway station. But for this you need 30 ... 50 Calibers. Restore - a few days. But the same 30 ... 50 Calibers stop all rail transportation if electricity is destroyed. And there are 300 diesel locomotives throughout the country. Despite the fact that the western and southern regions of the Ukrainian railway are not electrified, therefore, diesel locomotives all work there. And on the remaining 20 thousand kilometers of railway tracks, 1,5 thousand electric locomotives run. They ran, of course. They will stand. Further. The entire railway control system comes from electricity. Do not translate the arrows, or light the traffic light. Not a steam locomotive can be repaired in a depot. So it's more useful to destroy the power supply system. Loyal Ukrainians are all with us. And the rest still need to be well felt. On the subject of ukrofascism.
    And what about the shutdown of factories for the repair of military equipment? Let them work? I don't think this is true. What can you do without electricity?
  9. +10
    23 October 2022 16: 47
    Remember who can, it's a face. Tyatiana Gonchar. In the Kherson region, she passed on the locations of our firing points to her son-in-law in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    1. +4
      23 October 2022 16: 53
      Yes, and in Kherson in pharmacies and at gas stations, what's wrong is going on. The waiters have become more active. They are not even afraid of martial law.
      1. +3
        23 October 2022 17: 07
        Quote: tralflot1832
        The waiters have become more active. They are not even afraid of martial law. Send a couple to their historical homeland, for starters.

        There is a very good experience:
  10. +2
    23 October 2022 16: 49
    One hundred thousand is a lot. 1200 tanks.
    1. +4
      23 October 2022 17: 04
      Quote from nellyjuri
      One hundred thousand is a lot. 1200 tanks.

      Let's stop at one thousand four hundred and seventy. Here it is:

      holds 68 tons of oil products. Count yourself:
      100 : 000 = 68
      hi
      1. 0
        23 October 2022 18: 35
        What if it's big? Which are 160 tons.

        That's why I took an approximate figure of 80 tons, because the tanks are different.
        1. 0
          23 October 2022 19: 06
          Quote from nellyjuri
          What if it's big? Which are 160 tons.

          Why are you using unverified data?

          capacity of tank wagons varies from 22,9 t to 125 t. The volume of the railway tank ranges from 25,2 m3 to 161,5 m3.

          Technical characteristics of railway tanks:
          https://tktranskavkaz.ru/цистерны/
          hi
  11. +3
    23 October 2022 16: 55
    100 tons of fuel were destroyed, so for the MiG-000 (tanks of 29 tons) it turns out for 6 flights for one aircraft. For Su-16 for 000 flights. What else flies with the APU? Mi-24 helicopters - approximately 9 tons of fuel, 000 flights for one helicopter.
    1. +1
      23 October 2022 18: 21
      Still possible for the money: 100 thousand tons of diesel fuel = (rough estimate) 115 liters; a liter of diesel fuel in the Crimea - 000r; 000 x 58 = 115 rubles
  12. +1
    23 October 2022 16: 56
    It turns out that you can scout important targets and objects and inflict significant damage...
    Glorious, Comrade General Surovikin! fellow
    1. +1
      23 October 2022 17: 27
      Actually, you can google: Oil depots of the Cherkasy region.
      1. 0
        23 October 2022 22: 28
        Do you think they are all used? fuel can be kept at other enterprises. where are the tanks
        1. 0
          24 October 2022 06: 14
          But this is definitely not at the oil depot in Smela, within the city, on Sevastopolskaya 17. Smela is a rather serious junction station, it is clearly visible from the satellite. There are many buildings where you can hide such an amount of fuel.
  13. 0
    23 October 2022 17: 15
    they say the tank farm in the Cherkasy region was extinguished until the evening. well, it’s clear until it burns itself out and goes out
    1. +2
      23 October 2022 17: 39
      It burned out too fast... it shouldn't have gone so fast...
      1. +1
        23 October 2022 22: 25
        maybe there was not so much fuel there. although it is clearly in the hands of the local chiefs. slumped to the left. write off the Russian Federation bombed
  14. +7
    23 October 2022 17: 24
    There, apparently, there are capacities for a total of 100 thousand tons.
    To what extent they were filled and with what this question remains open.
    Knowing how much they like to overestimate the losses of the enemy in victorious reports, I have a fair amount of doubt about such a tidy sum.
    1. +2
      23 October 2022 18: 30
      Even if there was fuel only 1/10 of the indicated capacity of all tanks, then approximately 166 railway tanks are obtained, which is 55 tanks per echelon, so three full echelons. Still impressive...
  15. -4
    23 October 2022 18: 26
    The figure of 100 tons causes distrust of the data of our MO.
    one railway tank - just for the convenience of the assessment, we will take only 50 tons.
    It turns out that 2000 tank cars were blown up.
    Or 40 trains of 50 tank cars.
    To put it mildly, I can’t believe the MO data
  16. +3
    23 October 2022 18: 42
    100 tons is at least 000 cubic meters of kerosene with a density of 120-000. If these are vertical tanks with a volume of 0,81 m0,85, then 10000 pieces, each more than 3 meters in diameter and more than 12 meters high. And between such tanks there should be a distance commensurate with the diameter of the "barrels". Plus, the infrastructure for receiving and dispensing, as well as stringent requirements for aviation fuel in terms of storage, filtration, etc. For a large refinery, it takes more than a week to produce such a volume. Almost 30 standard wagons are needed for transportation. Therefore, I doubt something in such a quantity ... And where is such an oil depot in Ukraine?
    1. -1
      24 October 2022 00: 48
      So this is incomprehensible to you dill, the rest understand ...
      But wait, if your proto-ukry dug up the Black Sea with teaspoons, how can you even doubt such trifles ...
      1. +1
        24 October 2022 06: 14
        And here are your dill and their teaspoons from the Black Sea? I wrote what a tank farm for 100 tons should be. This is a huge area, reservoirs in dikes, access roads, loading and unloading platforms for railway and tankers, huge pumping stations. They should be visible to the naked eye from the Moon. Even at 000 tons, the oil depot is a fairly noticeable target. Where in the Cherkasy region was such an oil depot? If you show, we will all apologize and applaud.
        This is what a tank farm of comparable sizes looks like:
    2. -1
      24 October 2022 09: 37
      And where is such a tank farm in Ukraine? She's gone. ))) hi
      1. 0
        24 October 2022 12: 01
        Quote: duschman80-81
        And where is such a tank farm in Ukraine? She's gone. )))

        This is not a Ukrainian NB. For example, I showed how a tank farm with a storage capacity of about 100000 tons looks like. Even if the base is burned down, tank foundations, embankments, embankments, roads, etc. won't go anywhere. Instead of white "circles" will be black, that's all. Unless they start bulldozing.
    3. 0
      24 October 2022 11: 46
      Yes, most likely they lie in our MO. Because this event was not even highlighted on dill publics.
      Yes, and dill has long been that shells, that fuel is stored distributed.
  17. 0
    23 October 2022 19: 10
    And when they retreated, was it impossible to take it out or burn it?
  18. 0
    23 October 2022 21: 50
    100 thousand tons. And what does it look like in reality? What are some very large containers? Such and such a diameter and such and such a height?
  19. 0
    24 October 2022 09: 35
    I, and not only me, have a question - Why are they not touching the transport routes for this fuel and ammunition, how is equipment and weapons delivered to Ukraine? I doubt our intelligence knows this.
  20. 0
    24 October 2022 11: 21
    Quote: leonidych
    Oil refineries in Ukraine do not work. Fuel comes from Romania. There are deposits there. And the British pay for them. Delivery method through Northern Bukovina or Moldova.

    I think not, judging by the sharp decrease in the fuel supply in the United States, they brought it from there. Although unloaded, perhaps in Europe, in Bulgaria, Romania or somewhere else.
  21. VB
    +1
    24 October 2022 11: 56
    I'm embarrassed to ask, but did the fuel come from Russia? And who sent? And the senders are already in the basement of the Lubyanka and are preparing to be shot according to the laws of war? No. This is concern for partners, the truth is in the blood of Russian soldiers. Nothing, wait...
  22. 0
    24 October 2022 12: 14
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    In the Cherkasy region, a fuel depot was destroyed, where over 100 thousand tons aviation fuel - Ministry of Defense
    But this is just wonderful. Let the flyers walk ......

    100 thousand tons is an unrealistic figure
  23. 0
    24 October 2022 12: 16
    Quote from Fangaro
    100 thousand tons. And what does it look like in reality? What are some very large containers? Such and such a diameter and such and such a height?

    I agree with you
    Recalculate how much it will be in cubic meters, taking roughly
    1 m3 equal to 1 ton
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    24 October 2022 14: 58
    100 thousand tons of kerosene is a lot (in terms of volume, in particular). Was this warehouse just discovered? Interesting.