Russian Navy ships on combat duty in the Syrian port

33 771 258
Russian Navy ships on combat duty in the Syrian port

On the combat duty in the Syrian port embarked the ships of the Russian Navy, on board of which are the division of the marines. As reported with reference to the Israeli publication DEBKAfile Agency news reports, this information spread a source in Damascus, close to the president of Syria.

The publication notes that the task of the Russian military is the so-called "gunboat diplomacy" - preventing the slightest possibility of armed intervention in Syria. Earlier, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that a detachment of warships had been sent to the Mediterranean Sea. According to the press service of the department, "a group of ships from the Northern and Baltic fleets will carry out combat training missions in the Mediterranean Sea in cooperation with a detachment of combat ships of the Black Sea Fleet."

The grouping sent to the Mediterranean, as reported, includes the large landing ships (BDK) “Nikolai Filchenkov”, “Caesar Kunikov”, “Alexander Otrakovsky”, “George the Victorious” and “Kondopoga”. The consolidated squadron also includes the “Smetyly” and “Yaroslav the Wise” patrol ships, the Admiral Chabanenko BOD, the Nikolai Chiker, Sergey Osipov supply vessels, the Lena tanker and the rescue tugs Shakhtar and SB- 5.

“This is a landmark event,” said Natalia Makeeva, an expert at the Eurasia portal. - I couldn’t believe it anymore, but the Russian leadership made the right choice - instead of its usual half-hearted position, it decided to openly stand up for Syria. This is a challenge to the “world arbiter” and this is a question not only of mutual assistance. Because, after overthrowing Assad, the aggressor will not stop, as he did not stop after the death of Gaddafi. The next one will be Iran, and what will happen next, President Vladimir Putin, most likely, also understands very well. ”
258 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Klingenberg
    +43
    25 October 2012 20: 10
    Here it is in our opinion. Well done!
    1. +22
      25 October 2012 20: 38
      As an indicator for Turkey, if you attack Syria, it turns out you attacked us! The Pacific Sea to our sailors! And let the Turks sit at home! Hilary, Romney. McCain and the other democrats have already bitten all the nails and searched the logs!
      1. Starksa
        -1
        25 October 2012 20: 46
        while we are defending Syria because of the actively worked out Western hysteria, it turns out that Russia attacked Turkey and as a result, the system works one for all and all for one. By the way, how such countries as Germany will lead in such a situation, Eastern Europe will immediately pour mud along with Amerikostan
        1. +26
          25 October 2012 20: 48
          Quote: StarkSA
          By the way, as in such a situation countries such as Germany will lead, Eastern Europe will immediately pour mud along with it

          Well, well, winter is on the nose, however .. lol
          1. +10
            25 October 2012 21: 15
            say the coldest in 20 years good
            1. Rediska
              +2
              25 October 2012 22: 54
              I heard a set of jaaaaarcai budeeeett wink am soldier
            2. fktrctqxbr
              -1
              26 October 2012 01: 22
              and we say urine ran through the pipes.
              1. B000
                0
                26 October 2012 04: 17
                I do not agree, because the young man is right in his fears. In this situation, it is foolish to thresh yourself in the chest until the bones crackle. The decision is really significant, a very bold and decisive move (and a little "treacherous", because at the very beginning of the armistice bayram), it really is a blow to the balls of America. Just how radical will the expected response be?
                1. +1
                  30 October 2012 19: 39
                  I think it is unlikely that the Americans will take an adequate step, they will continue to bite from around the corner. Because they understand that this is not like chasing spirits through the desert. Moreover, as practice shows, they will not start military actions without having multiple superiority in the given region.
            3. terminator_163
              -1
              26 October 2012 03: 48
              What are you worried about, comrades ??? There is not much left until 12.12.2012. The end of the world is near!
              1. 0
                26 October 2012 21: 54
                What are you worried about, comrades ??? There is not much left until 12.12.2012. The end of the world is near!

                laughing
                1. SASCHAmIXEEW
                  -1
                  28 October 2012 16: 12
                  Only not 12 12 2012 and 21 12 12 g
              2. +1
                27 October 2012 19: 47
                Quote: terminator_163
                There is not much left until 12.12.2012. The end of the world is near!

                Has another prophet shown up? what
              3. 0
                30 October 2012 19: 43
                By the way, one of the predictors said that it was in the Mediterranean Sea that World War III would begin. Russia would use nuclear weapons against the US Navy.
                1. 0
                  30 October 2012 20: 13
                  Quote: vair
                  one of the forecasters said that it was in the Mediterranean Sea that World War III would begin. Russia would use nuclear weapons against the US Navy.

                  Nostradamus, I think, in a coffin turned over from such an interpretation of his quatrain.
                  But seriously, it is most likely Iran. The Yusovites are in a hurry. the only elections slowed them down.
              4. 0
                31 October 2012 22: 43
                Why piss, worse women ...
            4. 0
              27 October 2012 22: 26
              Yes, yes, and the gas is from Russia
          2. +2
            26 October 2012 07: 12
            Quote: lewerlin53rus
            Well, well, winter is on the nose, however .. lol


            They’re sitting at our dose. They will yelp .but to show the owner. How accurate Putin’s move is in time. Unambiguously however, in the top ten ... neither earlier nor later. The studies are large-scale before that ..... a good bouquet turned out
            1. +2
              26 October 2012 20: 05
              Our ships got up in time! After all, after the elections in America (2 weeks left), it would be time to attack, and here we are with the ships! Yes, and winter will begin, if Europe begs against us, it will be possible to organize such a terrorist act on our gas pipeline, they say, it will be necessary to reduce gas supply, otherwise you see, the terrorists blew us a pipe feel
              1. Jin
                0
                31 October 2012 14: 22
                Quote: crazyrom
                otherwise you see, terrorists blew us a pipe


                laughing By the type of Iranian approach to Turkey! And what, I’m even very!
        2. +15
          25 October 2012 20: 53
          Starksa,
          We will not be aggressors of the current if Turkey attacks Syria itself and the current if we beat Turkey in Syrian territory.
          As for the reaction of the West, the satellites of the USA Georgia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Great Britain will be watered, while France, Germany, Italy, Spain will be called to sit at the negotiating table, because we are trading partners with him and it is not profitable to argue with us, plus half of Europe on our gas , do not forget, there is always profit, Poland may remain silent. And the Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia in a trio are sleeping with us about the violation of Syrian rights and the death of armed peacekeepers from Turkey !!!
          And We should tell the US government .... close the beak !!!
          1. +4
            26 October 2012 11: 07
            If the Turks enter the confrontation with RUSSIA, then NATO must be drawn in. I’m not sure what they want .... This will eventually lead to NATO paralysis. So they will sit and snap their teeth, sometimes rattling their weapons.
            If you look from the other side and draw an analogy, then the 50th anniversary of the Caribbean crisis could turn into a Mediterranean crisis. After all, there, too, it all started with missiles in Turkey.
            1. +1
              26 October 2012 19: 18
              Quote: 30143
              then you have to get involved in NATO. I'm not sure what they want ....

              A trial ball was already there!
              Syrians shot down a Turkish reconnaissance phantom, so what?
              Turks all over the world declared aggression! Aggression towards a member of NATO!
              Article 5 of the Washington Treaty:
              The Contracting Parties agree that an armed attack on one or more of them in Europe or North America will be considered an attack on them as a whole and, therefore, agree that if such an armed attack takes place, each of them , in the exercise of the right to individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist a Contracting Party that has been attacked or Contracted by such an attack by immediately carrying out such individual or joint action as it considers necessary, including the application of armed forces to restore and subsequently maintain the security of the North Atlantic region.

              So what ?
              Does everyone remember that immediate response from the NATO Council?
              bully
              1. wax
                +2
                29 October 2012 00: 58
                In that episode, there was no Syrian attack on Turkey. The Turks began to hysteria.
        3. +16
          25 October 2012 21: 03
          Quote: StarkSA

          while we are defending Syria because of the actively worked out Western hysteria, it turns out that Russia attacked Turkey and as a result, the system works one for all and all for one.

          I think that in the field of information war Russia has become much more experienced than in 2008.

          Quote: StarkSA
          we are defending Syria due to the actively worked out Western hysteria it turns out that Russia attacked Turkey and

          I think that Russia has also prepared to wage an information war.
          1. Starksa
            +3
            25 October 2012 21: 03
            so I’m leading to what happened in 2008, we must learn to conduct information wars
      2. +1
        25 October 2012 22: 39
        Quote: Esso
        As an indicator for Turkey, if you attack Syria, then it turns out you attacked us!

        The only thing that the Turks can close the strait to our ships.
        1. Denzel13
          0
          30 October 2012 18: 10
          Do not close - the gas valve can also close.
    2. +21
      25 October 2012 21: 00
      Here is our answer!
    3. Wanderer1980
      +1
      26 October 2012 00: 27
      The news, of course, warms the soul, but on DEBKAfile.com I could not find this article.
      It turns out that Putin was not lying when he "explained" to Erdogan.
      1. -12
        26 October 2012 02: 23
        On the illustration to the news of the TFR "Sharp" (project 61). This ship was launched in 1966 year. Do you think American sailors are laughing or laughing at the sight of this half-century trough?

        The last remnants of a stolen fleet
        1. Alex 241
          +3
          26 October 2012 02: 25
          A singing frigate, once the pride of the fleet. Do you know that a woman took part in its development?
          1. wolverine7778
            +1
            26 October 2012 11: 35
            Do you know that a woman took part in its development?
            A plus. Yes, when I was in Artek, they drove to this warship, I noticed that everything was not so monotonous, everything was broken by several simple horizontal lines, and this is probably a female hand good
        2. PLO
          +4
          26 October 2012 04: 48
          Do you think American sailors are laughing or laughing at the sight of this half-century trough?

          let them laugh, he’s not there alone, and to light it, in which case he can still give
          besides, the quick-witted still run, a year or two maximum, and as soon as the first 11356th-wise, the quick-witted, along with the inquisitive and Ladny write off to the Black Sea Fleet

          The last remnants of a stolen fleet

          Although the Black Sea Fleet is currently the weakest fleet, nevertheless, oddly enough, the prospects of the Black Sea Fleet are among the brightest, at least 6 new frigates and 6 submarines, forces quite adequate for the Black and Mediterranean Seas
          1. +2
            26 October 2012 08: 23
            Quote: olp
            Although the Black Sea Fleet is currently the weakest fleet, nevertheless, oddly enough, the prospects of the Black Sea Fleet are among the brightest, at least 6 new frigates and 6 submarines, forces quite adequate for the Black and Mediterranean Seas

            And coastal artillery will block half of the Black Sea.
          2. dimanf
            -1
            26 October 2012 10: 53
            Quote: olp
            6 frigates and 6 deaths, forces are quite adequate for the Black and Mediterranean Seas


            do you really think so?
            1. PLO
              +1
              26 October 2012 11: 40
              do you really think so?

              You are not?
              1. dimanf
                0
                26 October 2012 11: 53
                Quote: olp
                You are not?


                Of course not.
                http://flot.sevastopol.info/ship/today/today.htm
                interesting link.
                leaf through and understand.
                1. PLO
                  +1
                  26 October 2012 11: 55
                  Of course not.
                  http://flot.sevastopol.info/ship/today/today.htm
                  interesting link.
                  leaf through and understand.

                  leafed through, did not learn anything new
                  and what should I understand?
                  1. dimanf
                    -1
                    26 October 2012 19: 18
                    Quote: olp
                    leafed through, did not learn anything new
                    and what should I understand?


                    look at the size of the fleet for today compared to the 1990th year.
                    count how much more will be written off by the time you put into operation your 12 units.

                    but for the soul, go to Sevastopol and look at the half-empty berths.
                    and the marines haven’t updated their equipment for 20 years.
                    1. PLO
                      +2
                      26 October 2012 20: 07
                      look at the size of the fleet for today compared to the 1990th year.
                      count how much more will be written off by the time you put into operation your 12 units.

                      not too lazy looked
                      total in the NK, if you do not take into account the ships written off almost immediately after the partition, then in the Black Sea Fleet in the early 90s there were 13 warships of the far sea zone, of which 5 ships were the same age as Smetlivy, the armament and effectiveness of which even then became completely insufficient
                      of these 13, at the moment 5 ships are left
                      of these 5, they will probably write off the Shrewd, Inquisitive and Okay,
                      how things are with Kerch I’m not particularly aware, but he is relatively young above the above and he’s unlikely to be written off right away

                      if Amber builds ships at the current pace, then in 3 years all 6 frigates will go into operation
                      then the Black Sea Fleet will have 8 ships in the ocean zone, and these 8 ships are head and shoulders above the fleet composition at the time of the division
                      I’m not saying that it’s a lot, but thanks to them the Black Sea Fleet will again become a battle fleet, unlike the current flotilla
                      I personally hope that for the Black Sea Fleet they will extend the 11356th series by another 3 ships, there was talk about it,


                      but for the soul, go to Sevastopol and look at the half-empty berths.

                      Russia is not the USSR, is it good or bad another question

                      and the marines haven’t updated their equipment for 20 years.

                      this is another aspect of rearmament, although not unimportant

                      I will unsubscribe on submarines
                      1. PLO
                        +4
                        26 October 2012 20: 24
                        at the time of the division, the Black Sea Fleet had about 12 Project 641 submarines and about the same number of Project 613 submarines (which were all actually written off in 91 because they were built back in the 50s), there was only one modern one there, Alrosa, strictly speaking, it was the only one left, Georgiya will probably not be repaired anymore, and 7 submarines are quite comparable with 12 Project 641 submarines that lived out their days in the 90s, and only a few of them made it into the new century as part of the fleet
            2. +1
              26 October 2012 22: 08
              do you really think so?

              the main armament of the Moskva P-1000 Vulcan missile, the cruiser does not even have to go to sea, it can shoot from the raid, provided that a pair of A-50M is in the air ...
              1. dimanf
                0
                26 October 2012 22: 18
                Quote: PSih2097
                the main armament of the Moskva P-1000 Vulcan missile, the cruiser does not even have to go to sea, it can shoot from the raid, provided that a pair of A-50M is in the air ...



                Missile cruiser "Slava" ("Moscow")
                Armament: 16 launchers of the Bazalt complex (16 P-500 missiles), 8x8 B-204 launchers of the S-300F Rif anti-aircraft missile system (ammunition load of 64 5V55 anti-aircraft missiles), 2x2 ZIF-122 anti-aircraft missile launchers complex "Osa-MA" (ammunition for 48 anti-aircraft missiles 9M33), 1x2 130-mm gun mount AK-130 (ammunition 2000 rounds), 6 6-barreled 30-mm gun mounts AK-630 (ammunition 16000 rounds), 2x5 533- mm torpedo tubes, 2x12 RBU-6000 rocket launchers, 1 Ka-27 anti-submarine helicopter.
                Crew: 510 people.
                1. +3
                  27 October 2012 02: 35
                  Missile cruiser "Slava" ("Moscow")
                  Armament: 16 launchers of the "Basalt" complex (16 P-500 missiles)

                  "Volcanoes" are there, not "basalt", before the coup, on the rest of the ships of this series they were going to change, but did not grow together, and then it went, it went (dashing 90s) ...
          3. sea
            sea
            0
            31 October 2012 15: 50
            schA "gyurzu" will accept and have fun lads.
        3. +9
          26 October 2012 09: 06
          Nimitz - 68
          Dwight D. Eisenhower - 70
          And somehow you do not laugh.
          1. dimanf
            -1
            26 October 2012 11: 08
            Quote: urzul
            Nimitz - 68
            Dwight D. Eisenhower - 70
            And somehow you do not laugh.


            incorrect comparison!
            ] "Nimitz" and "Dwight Eisenhower" are floating airfields with a minimum of weapons and they solve a narrow range of tasks.
            and Savvy is a great ship. but outdated already mentally and physically.
            1. Bashkaus
              +1
              26 October 2012 17: 17
              ok, let's see the age of the aircraft on these aircraft carriers? ))) F18 modernized, and he became obsolete in the eyes of the C300
              1. dimanf
                +1
                26 October 2012 19: 33
                Quote: Bashkaus

                ok, let's see the age of the aircraft on these aircraft carriers? ))) F18 modernized, and he became obsolete in the eyes of the C300


                But where on the sharp-witted C300?

                Armament after modernization: 2x4 launchers of Kh-35 "Uran" anti-ship missiles, 1x2 76-mm gun mount AK-726, 2x2 SAM "Volna" (16 missiles), 1x5 533-mm torpedo tube (5 torpedoes), 2 RBU-rocket launchers 1000
          2. 0
            26 October 2012 11: 23
            Quote: urzul
            Nimitz - 68 Dwight D. Eisenhower - 70

            You distort the numbers. Nimitz was launched in 1972. Eisenhower - at 1975
            Quote: urzul
            And somehow you do not laugh.

            I don’t laugh. Three generations of weapons have already changed on Nimitsy.
            Interceptors:
            F4 "Phantom" - F-14 "Tomcat" - F / A-18E "Super Hornet"
            Drums:
            A-6 "Intruder" --- F / A-18 "Hornet" - F / A-18E "Super Hornet"
            EW aircraft:
            EA-3 Skywarrior --- EA-6B Prowler --- EF-18 Growler
            1. +5
              26 October 2012 16: 12
              Indeed, I'm sorry, I wrote the bookmark dates.
              But Sharp with 1990 — 1995 was undergoing modernization, with the installation of new radars, the replacement of RCC Termite and the installation of new jammers
              1. +1
                26 October 2012 18: 44
                Quote: urzul
                But Savvy with 1990 — 1995 went through modernization, with the installation new radars, replacement of RCC Termite and installation of new jammers

                Great modernization turned TFR "Sharpie" into "aircraft carrier killer" smile

                In fact, all the weapons remained the same, including the Volna air defense missile system developed in 1956 (pictured) and the AK-726 artillery mount accepted into service on May 23, 1964. In all fairness, this ship should have been decommissioned a quarter of a century ago; these days, the presence of such a trough only insults the honor of the Russian Navy.
        4. +9
          26 October 2012 10: 15
          When in 1770 the Russian squadrons of Spiridov and Orlov entered the Mediterranean Sea, all progressive mankind also shook from their dilapidation, but for some reason it shut up after Chesma.
        5. Bashkaus
          +1
          26 October 2012 17: 16
          it’s more correct to say that they are sitting on treason ... Do not underestimate the capabilities of our BOD
        6. 0
          26 October 2012 17: 42
          Come to the mirror and take a closer look, there you will see a stupid bore, an obvious healer of the West, rejoicing in everything that is bad in his Fatherland. Together with the foolish laugh - go and work. Maybe you will bring some benefit to the Homeland, or, in extreme cases, to your close relatives. Go for it !!!
        7. SASCHAmIXEEW
          0
          28 October 2012 16: 18
          And on the trough you can install a rocket
        8. Oleg Rosskiyy
          0
          29 October 2012 23: 38
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Do you think American sailors are laughing or laughing at the sight of this half-century trough?

          I think the "valiant American sailors" have developed diarrhea and the US Treasury needs to get the press rolling or there won't be enough toilet paper.
        9. 0
          30 October 2012 17: 28
          He may be an old man, but he can definitely tear the enemy's ass to pieces!
        10. Denzel13
          0
          30 October 2012 18: 18
          The main thing is presence there. I do not think that there will be a NATO "smart guy" who will dare to sink even this not new ship. But to support the possible actions of the Marines against terrorists in the port area, probably quite good.
        11. BorisBM
          0
          22 November 2012 14: 41
          Your truth and our shame. It is unlikely that this scrap metal will scare even China. It is ridiculous to even talk about NATO. This is simply a demonstration and not for the enemy, but for us, our own. I don’t know whether the Americans are laughing or not, but these museum exhibits apparently arouse interest. It is so bitter to look at the fruits of Mr. Serdyukov’s activity. He is not worth a damn.
  2. +18
    25 October 2012 20: 13
    and a hundred pounds where in the depths of the submarine hid. Great move. Waiting for an answer s
    1. s1н7т
      -15
      25 October 2012 22: 22
      Quote: Ragnarek
      and a hundred pounds where in the depths of the submarine hid

      American?
      1. +14
        25 October 2012 22: 28
        What are you ... Polish of course!
        1. +5
          26 October 2012 01: 16
          Yes, she is Ukrainian. recently got hold of antiques laughing
          1. +1
            26 October 2012 07: 17
            Quote: lewerlin53rus
            Yes, she is Ukrainian. recently got hold of antiques laughing

            A little late ... probably the Polish-Ukrainian crew
      2. Bashkaus
        +1
        26 October 2012 17: 19
        I think everyone is missing there, both ours and American. I only suspect the American nuclear submarine for a long time to lie at the bottom like a gudgeon without moving until ours depart.
      3. 0
        26 October 2012 17: 46
        And how did you guess? Yes! American, in a fright before ours, RUSSIAN !!!. And there’s nothing to urchin.
  3. +17
    25 October 2012 20: 13
    Telegraphist.RF notes that DEBKAfile is a well-known information disinfectant. According to official Syrian and Russian naval media, there was no Russian fleet entry to Tartus on October 24th.
    Competently "they" feed us with dezo! ..
    1. alatau_09
      +5
      25 October 2012 20: 21
      "... with reference to the Israeli edition ..." - groping, pinching ...
      1. +2
        25 October 2012 21: 15
        alatau_09,
        Something I did not find this information on newsru.co.il
        1. alatau_09
          0
          25 October 2012 21: 24
          Igor67,
          this is from the article we are discussing, read carefully ...
          1. +4
            25 October 2012 21: 33
            alatau_09,
            They refer to the debit file, type it in Google and do a page translation, maybe I don’t see well there, either, there is an old message when the squadron was during the Olympics
            1. alatau_09
              0
              25 October 2012 21: 41
              Igor67,
              we are discussing this article here, all claims against its author and / or freelance translator.
              or maybe you should contact the moderators for a new-old disinformation news item?
              1. +2
                25 October 2012 21: 50
                alatau_09,
                The point is not the old or the new, the main thing. It must be true, was there information that the ships left Tartus a month ago, when they were able to return?
                1. alatau_09
                  +6
                  25 October 2012 22: 01
                  Igor67,
                  the point of my toast is in this, read it again! if there are Russian Navy ships there, then not such a large unit..., here I agree with PARTIZAN Today, 20:13 and altman (1) Today, 20:18 ...
                  deliberately false information is being thrown out to test the reaction or disinformation to justify some actions and/or create the opinion that "while we - the Jewish Americans - are thinking about whether to interfere or not, the RUSSIANS are already in charge there" - do you feel the difference?
                  But I support the view that it is NECESSARY to be present as a deterrent ....
                  1. +6
                    25 October 2012 22: 30
                    alatau_09,
                    I don't like loud slogans, they confuse the true intentions of both the US and Europe and Russia. There is an oil and gas war going on, and if Russia "loses" Syria, it will lose the South Stream, and these losses are much greater than writing off 10 billion dollars. And soldiers will die for fuel,
                    1. alatau_09
                      0
                      25 October 2012 22: 45
                      Igor67,
                      many do not like slogans, but speak loudly about it ...

                      explain, in this case, why the NATO soldiers and usas perish in Afghanistan, Iraq, and sowing. Africa, why do the Jews need military bases around the world and the perimeter of the CIS in particular ??? Why do they need Syria, which is in the sphere of interests of the Russian Federation? that they are few of their spheres? they have no problems in the country ???

                      let's not talk about slogans .... Nobody, today, neglects big politics in the interests of their country and its future ... and we should not replace one with another ...
                      It is very touching on your part to care about the soldiers of what is essentially an enemy country...
                      1. 0
                        25 October 2012 22: 51
                        alatau_09,
                        Also under the guise of beautiful slogans about democracy, they die for oil
                      2. alatau_09
                        0
                        25 October 2012 22: 56
                        Igor67,
                        far from standard oil...
                      3. +1
                        25 October 2012 23: 05
                        alatau_09,
                        Naturally, but specifically about Syria, if Assad is removed, the oil and gas pipeline will go to Europe through Syria, and then what? Why do I always argue with Gromova? She is covertly offering Russian guys to help the oligarchs earn another billion. On the other hand, under the guise of that fairy tale about democracy, the Westerners are laying down their guys, A Vicious Circle am
                      4. alatau_09
                        0
                        25 October 2012 23: 16
                        Igor67,
                        you will decide "naturally" - you agree with me that it is far from being for oil or "the oil and gas pipe will go to Europe through Syria, and then what?" - do you insist on oil ??? .....
                        and, in your opinion, why did the USSR win the Second World War ???
                      5. 0
                        25 October 2012 23: 24
                        alatau_09,
                        The question is about the moral aspect or still technical. If the latter, then of course, possessing huge energy and other resources.......Yes, I put hydrocarbons in first place, and the prestige of the country in second place, in short.
                      6. alatau_09
                        +1
                        25 October 2012 23: 46
                        Igor67,
                        hmm, western mercantility and eastern ideology ...
                        not everything is measured in dollars (euros) ....

                        I consider continuing the conversation useless, since I stand on moral principles, because I believed and believe that the less morality, the easier it is to make money.
                        Yes, and they won the Great Patriotic War because they were morally stronger and did not fight for money or various resources...
                      7. +3
                        25 October 2012 23: 54
                        alatau_09,
                        What do you know about war? And what is the connection between the Great Patriotic War? Half of my family died at the front and became disabled during the Great Patriotic War, there is no need to connect the Syrian issue with the Great Patriotic War, there is no connection. I am a simple worker, I have no interest in any war, I survived one and I don’t wish it on you, goodbye!
                      8. 0
                        26 October 2012 22: 20
                        do not connect the Syrian issue with the Second World War, there is not any connection.

                        Well, why, Silesia and Poland ... Does it not remind you of anything?
                      9. SASCHAmIXEEW
                        0
                        28 October 2012 16: 45
                        They die for the money that their countries pay them, and ours will die (if any) for the profits of Miller and Putin and for the Syrian people!
                  2. +1
                    26 October 2012 17: 51
                    Just like in the old joke, when the Americans arrived on the moon, they were horrified by the number of empty Soviet-made bottles. Since then, you can’t drag them to the moon on the lasso.
    2. Bashkaus
      0
      26 October 2012 17: 20
      oh, the Georgian drone also didn’t shoot down in the spring of 2008. And our railway troops in Abkhazia also did not enter on the first of the same year))
  4. 0
    25 October 2012 20: 15
    WELL DONE! That's how it should be! good
  5. +11
    25 October 2012 20: 18
    In addition to "Smetlivy", there are no ships off the coast of Syria .. all the large landing ships of the Northern Fleet have returned to the base long ago, as well as "Chabanenko" and "Wise"
    1. +2
      25 October 2012 23: 10
      Probably someone decided to mock this article. Can someone explain what happens with the info on the site?
      1. 0
        25 October 2012 23: 16
        alexneg,
        I looked in google a lot of news sites printed this, referring to each other
        1. 0
          26 October 2012 00: 15
          Yes, I checked it right away, but it’s not clear where and for what purpose this info appeared, which is not confirmed by official news sources.
          1. +2
            27 October 2012 08: 15
            All these events took place ... in August of this year !! All the ships have been at their bases for a long time, the "Sharp-witted" has already driven them to Sevastopol and is now only returning to the Mediterranean .. I don't understand where this infa comes from?
  6. +1
    25 October 2012 20: 21
    Anyway, if this is not a disinformation, then our beauties. and if all the same desa. then our hint how to behave defending our interests
  7. +2
    25 October 2012 20: 22
    Finally, how much snot can be chewed. Waiting for confirmation from other sources.

    «This is a momentous event, ”said Natalya Makeeva, an expert at the Eurasia portal. - I could not believe it anymore, but the Russian leadership made the right choice - instead of its usual, half-hearted position, it decided to openly defend Syria. This is a challenge to the “world arbiter” and this is not only a matter of mutual assistance.

    I completely agree with this position.
  8. dmnatbor
    0
    25 October 2012 20: 24
    Come on Vladimir Vladimirovich!
    Do not drift, break through!
  9. dmnatbor
    +17
    25 October 2012 20: 26
    Come on, Vladimir Vladimirovich!
    Do not drift, break through!
    1. s1н7т
      -32
      25 October 2012 22: 25
      Will you break through alone or do you want to bury our marines and sailors next to you? Let your idol break through yourself! With you, of course)
      1. Vanek
        +8
        26 October 2012 05: 53
        Oh, rudeness now run up.

        Quote: c1n7
        With you, of course)


        With you too.
      2. +2
        26 October 2012 17: 59
        The less there will be such caring as you - more will become our country.
      3. +2
        26 October 2012 22: 23
        Will you break through alone or do you want to bury our marines and sailors next to you?

        And how many Russians (in Syria) are there, have you ever thought ??? And yes, all the military live well before the war, and then their work begins, and the military’s job is to shovel and die, but in order to kill more enemies and they regretted climbing ... IMHO
        1. DIMS
          +2
          26 October 2012 22: 25
          Quote: PSih2097
          And yes, all the military live well before the war, and then their work begins ... IMHO

          And sometimes they relate to the tasks set, "you guys need to ..." and sometimes "that would ... fly in ..."
          1. +1
            27 October 2012 02: 38
            and sometimes "that would ... flew in ..."

            laughing This is the Army ...
  10. YOUNG
    +13
    25 October 2012 20: 28
    You can believe the Israeli source - they themselves are afraid of the appearance of the Russian Navy, because it is not profitable for them - this is the time.
    Syria and its ally, Iran, have now felt the real strength of the allies - these are two.
    And the third: Russia has made it clear to the whole world that this time it will not be silent
    1. s1н7т
      -4
      25 October 2012 22: 26
      Quote: YOUNG
      Russia has made it clear to the whole world that this time it will not be silent

      What is it clear from?
      1. YOUNG
        0
        29 October 2012 10: 23
        Everyone understood and you did not understand. Read the article
        1. +1
          30 October 2012 16: 51
          Of course, it is completely clear that if Russia faces a direct open confrontation with NATO, then we will lose, we must honestly admit this, but we can cause colossal damage, so Western pragmatists will think three times and Russia has practically no allies, this is a minus
  11. +9
    25 October 2012 20: 30
    If misinformation, then I will refrain from commenting, just shake the air ... If this is true, then it will be very hot there, in two senses ... and in the informational (like the information war on 08.08.08 will again be doused with mud.) And in combat. Eh, they would give a felt boot on the back of the neck to those who muddy the waters "around" Syria ..
    1. Jin
      0
      31 October 2012 14: 52
      I agree, this is not a topic for jokes! If this is disinformation, then it’s very, very cynical (((
  12. zz2003_1974
    +2
    25 October 2012 20: 31
    If it's not disinformation?!!! It gives me goosebumps. The news is so pleasant to the brain!!!!!!
    1. s1н7т
      -11
      25 October 2012 22: 32
      When I was in school, I accompanied my father to the airport - a flight to Kabul. Around - armored personnel carriers, military cordon - also goosebumps. Then - 200 thousand (he himself took some at the airport later). Do we need it? Or do you have a different brain structure?
      1. zz2003_1974
        +13
        25 October 2012 22: 56
        You studied in vain, although sometimes your brain doesn’t help your studies, you don’t have to confuse what was and what is now !!!! I’m not bloodthirsty, but sometimes I can show my teeth, and if the leadership of the country does it ..............., then at least they will know what and why !! In your opinion, 08.08.08 was a mistake, it was necessary to sit out. So they will shred little by little, and you live memories in fear !!!!!

        Bold may not live long, but cowards do not live at all !!!!

        Bold can not live long, but cowards do not live at all !!!
        1. dimanf
          -5
          25 October 2012 23: 15
          Quote: zz2003_1974
          ! I’m not bloodthirsty, but sometimes I can show my teeth, and if the leadership of the country does it ..............., then at least they will know what and why !! In your opinion, 08.08.08 was a mistake, it was necessary to sit out. So they will shred little by little, and you live memories in fear !!!!!


          What do you have in combat experience?
          1. zz2003_1974
            +8
            25 October 2012 23: 19
            I'm not talking about the fact that I do not know !!!!!! But I can’t say what passed, participated it will be more accurate !!
            1. dimanf
              -9
              25 October 2012 23: 34
              Quote: zz2003_1974

              I'm not talking about the fact that I do not know !!!!!! But I can’t say what passed, participated it will be more accurate !!


              why are you still not in Syria?
              or not in the Caucasus?
              1. zz2003_1974
                +1
                25 October 2012 23: 45
                But as if you are my dad and just drove me home))))) Where am I ?????
                1. dimanf
                  -2
                  25 October 2012 23: 50
                  Quote: zz2003_1974
                  Where I am?????


                  definitely not in the Caucasus!
                  1. zz2003_1974
                    +3
                    26 October 2012 00: 04
                    Father!! You definitely don’t build airplanes in the Caucasus!!!!
              2. +6
                26 October 2012 01: 07
                You, Dima, would say this about yourself, but for such conversations you get hit in the face.
                1. dimanf
                  -3
                  26 October 2012 11: 19
                  Quote: dld35057
                  you would say to yourself Dima, and so they beat him in the face for such conversations.


                  got these computer heroes.
                  cool to offer to fight, knowing that you yourself will not participate!
      2. +6
        26 October 2012 10: 21
        Quote: c1n7
        Do we need it? Or do you have a different brain structure?


        The brains of those who do not understand that we are not talking about Syria and the like... If we now give up our positions on the distant approaches to our border, then we will have to count the 200s on our territory, when this whole pack of enraged religious fanatics, under the instigation of the USA, begin to establish their world caliphate all the way to the Volga region.
        1. s1н7т
          -2
          28 October 2012 14: 48
          Quote: vadimN
          The brain is unsettled by those who do not understand that this is not about Syria and their ilk ... If we now surrender our positions on the far approaches to our border, then the 200s will have to be considered

          Yes, you are a strategist, however! laughing
          All these "positions" were given up long ago - together with the Union. And the "200s" today are in peaceful "life" more often than in the 40th Army. And all this nonsense about the "caliphate" prevents you from thinking about the real problems of the country.
        2. Piran
          0
          29 October 2012 13: 19
          They want a caliphate all the way to Chukotka
      3. vvr-81
        -1
        29 October 2012 16: 07
        yes, of course, don’t let the Japanese smoked, we give Siberia to the Chinese, for which they gave us everything and let's give up Syria and let’s throw Yugoslavia to death Well, no, I’ve had enough to do it, but for Afghanistan, thanks to Gorbachev tell him he bent down to the west
      4. +1
        31 October 2012 17: 57
        Quote: c1n7
        When I was in school, I accompanied my father to the airport - a flight to Kabul. Around - armored personnel carriers, military cordon - also goosebumps. Then - 200 thousand (he himself took some at the airport later). Do we need it? Or do you have a different brain structure?

        If all of Russia were with your brain device, soon you would at best clean your Americans boots, and at worst would look at your native expanses from behind the concentration camp grid.

        I think that in childhood, fights with the boys in the yard usually ended not in your favor: there is no spirit. With such pacifism in the mood, they always merge even before the real "hostilities" begin and fists are used. And such a boy becomes an object of ridicule and mockery in the yard. It's like in boxing - can you imagine a pacifist boxer? In boxing, it is often not physical strength that decides, but moral strength, spirit, readiness to fight to victory... And politics is not boxing, it is more like a street fight, where the most vile techniques and blows are allowed. Here, with such pacifism, they will take away the last, and you will not be able to sit back like "I'm not bothering anyone!" On the contrary, whoever is ready to fight back - they will not touch him.

        And with the same attitude as you, you and your family will not protect if a couple of drunken robbers come along. This is not at all a man's position, it is some kind of "liberalism".
    2. laurbalaur
      -10
      26 October 2012 00: 16
      Will your brain go to war, or mom?
      1. zz2003_1974
        +10
        26 October 2012 00: 30
        I will tell you so, I have already given my homeland. And so that after me there would be someone whose duty to give the motherland my son grows up and he studies at the Suvorov school !!! And for my mother, I would be very pleased to say the least ..... in ....... al !!!!!
        1. laurbalaur
          +1
          26 October 2012 00: 51
          zz2003_1974 Well, I, my friend, gave my duty in Afghanistan, so with such highs, you can go somewhere to the nearest clinic and ask for a little bleed your testosterone. You remind me of Trotsky.
          1. Alex 241
            +3
            26 October 2012 00: 54
            What are you guys upset about? This is just an information site, and you are already ready to converge in the bayonet ...........
            1. +3
              26 October 2012 00: 57
              Squeeze your nerves in check !, at work not a shit ...
              1. Alex 241
                +1
                26 October 2012 01: 01
                Sash is sometimes easier said than done ...........
                1. +2
                  26 October 2012 01: 06
                  Teska! for our generation, there’s no need to speak, in combat we understood each other from a semi-glance. At a time when a generational gap occurred, either we or ..... Pepsi-Cola. I still do not see specific patriots. If they call, let's go?
                  1. Alex 241
                    +3
                    26 October 2012 01: 10
                    Sasha will be in line at the military registration and enlistment office, I’ll catch bread and stews, you will stockpile with smoke. soldier
                    1. +2
                      26 October 2012 01: 17
                      Do not piss tesya, let’s go through the line! I’ll capture a couple of blankets, and the employers will provide the rest.
                      1. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 01: 18
                        Be a spock !!!!!!!!!!! good
                      2. 0
                        26 October 2012 01: 28
                        I strongly doubt the current generation of fighters! Well, I don’t see "state thinking" in them. That is why I do not throw away my "kirzachs and ankle boots", relatively speaking. And who else will go to defend our Earth? It is sad that the people of the sovereign also do not know who will defend the Russian lands!
                      3. Alex 241
                        +6
                        26 October 2012 01: 29
                        Sasha, not everything is so bad, remember the 6th company, the same guys ... I believe that there is what is called genetic memory, today's example, a special forces soldier covered himself with a bomb.
                      4. +2
                        26 October 2012 01: 39
                        It was in the 2000th. Anyway, the guys were brought up at the end of the Union! A low bow to all of them for heroism and courage !!! The only combat use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was 08.08.08. The effect was, but given that there was a long preparation of the GRU, then at least aviation losses are generally unacceptable !!!
                      5. Alex 241
                        +4
                        26 October 2012 01: 44
                        Sash such aviation losses over the course of several days in a local conflict, it’s nonsense for me, and that operation was extended by three eights due to the dedication of soldiers and officers, agree?
                      6. +3
                        26 October 2012 01: 55
                        What am I talking about! Moreover, the loss of the 22nd car. And open containers on the captured Georgian "Wasp"! Either unjustified self-confidence, or "our bitches were in the air defense calculations." I believe that the war was won on the full account of the GRU, albeit with completely unjustified losses, in aviation in the first place! Wrong time! There shouldn't have been any losses at all!
                      7. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 02: 00
                        Sasha is a complex problem, or as you know, an avalanche-like increase in the emergency situation. When a failure in the control circuit leads to disaster, we were not shown much, but judging by what I read on the Internet, it was complete starting from the fact that during They couldn’t find the Minister of Defense for several hours. And one more question why the STR didn’t work at 22
                      8. +2
                        26 October 2012 02: 09
                        The sad thing is that they were ready for war with an accuracy of the date, the pieces were going since April. Okay, at least Prizedent was "slightly" aware.
                      9. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 02: 12
                        Everything is always "slightly" with us, they did not take into account, they did not foresee, and then they have to pay in blood. Well, after the survivors of the award, who died eternal memory with a plywood star. It is all sad.
                      10. 0
                        26 October 2012 02: 24
                        I don't recall much of the media coverage of the merits. In fact, the war was calculated, albeit with errors. And the end result was supposed to be a change of regime.
                      11. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 02: 28
                        In Georgia, Sash?
                      12. +1
                        26 October 2012 02: 32
                        Of course in Georgia. I don’t understand why Dimon shot him, although the alignment was complete, right up to the coordinates of Misha’s movement.
                      13. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 02: 38
                        Sash, the local population was treated and anti-Russian in spirit, remember the Kikabidze interview, and we are not ready for such operations.
                      14. 0
                        26 October 2012 02: 47
                        Politically, I agree, there was no processing. But in military - strategic terms, everything was done perfectly: roads, airfields, assembly buildings, and other infrastructure. And with minimal losses of civilians. And the population of Georgia is our people! Kikabidze can distract part of the population to himself and nothing more. In my opinion, the Georgian people are much closer to the Belarusians and Ukrainians.
                      15. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 02: 51
                        Sash is a full-scale operation in the city, you know, I think it would be a repetition of the Maykop brigade ...........
                      16. +2
                        26 October 2012 02: 55
                        Let us dwell on the fact that "the enforcement of peace" had the proper effect.
                      17. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 02: 57
                        Yes, Sash, exactly. For the upcoming changes in Georgia we will soon see, and why not this tree of freedom, irrigate the blood of Russian soldiers ..
                      18. 0
                        26 October 2012 03: 02
                        Of course, I doubt that the changes will be pro-Russian, I am sure that they will still be pro-American. But this is temporary. And there was more than enough blood in 2008!
                      19. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 03: 04
                        It will be pro-Russian, believe me.
                      20. 0
                        26 October 2012 03: 10
                        If they do, then only after Misha.
                      21. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 03: 11
                        As one movie hero said: Patience is my friend, and the stubble will turn into gold.
                      22. 0
                        26 October 2012 03: 14
                        In this case, is Russia's policy based on Syria?
                      23. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 03: 16
                        Sasha, here you drove me into a corner, I don’t know what to say ........ State your preferences ...........
                      24. 0
                        26 October 2012 03: 24
                        As a result, we returned to the topic. I suppose, but I don’t have it. Syria is our stronghold in the Middle East, it is not entirely clear to me why Primakov is silent? Syria is our Bastion, which we must not lose.
                      25. Alex 241
                        0
                        26 October 2012 03: 35
                        Sash in the Middle East is building an arc of American influence, we would be happy to cheat, but nothing.
                      26. +2
                        26 October 2012 03: 44
                        The arc does not build itself, the Americans have already built it and are waiting for its collapse. And Russia's cheeks must be puffed up in every possible way: with naval campaigns; and civil aviation flights, and "triad" maneuvers. Maybe it is worth holding the "Begemot-3" exercises? I am sure there will be an effect.
                      27. Alex 241
                        +1
                        26 October 2012 03: 51
                        Sasha, I wrote about this, What should I go then? Maneuvers, this is more window dressing, here's daily training is another matter ............
                  2. +2
                    26 October 2012 22: 31
                    If they call, let's go?

                    Namesake, where are we going? How will we look into the eyes of grandfathers?
                    1. Alex 241
                      0
                      26 October 2012 22: 32
                      ++++++++++++++ good soldier
                  3. vvr-81
                    -1
                    29 October 2012 16: 25
                    a patriot and loud sounds only now What a patriotism I’m just talking about balabol I’m yes I’m all but but I don’t open all those who fall into our homeland and don’t give GOD the vainoi
            2. laurbalaur
              0
              26 October 2012 01: 01
              Alex 241 Thanks for the correct comment, Alexander! Just recently, I notice that VO is becoming more and more propaganda, rather than informational. And a huge bunch of normal people want to clash in a bayonet, not understanding the consequences.
              1. Alex 241
                0
                26 October 2012 01: 05
                So it’s not the only one I noticed, it’s time to name the site a political review, there are less and less interesting topics to discuss, and whatever it’s discussed, we’ll always slide into the political plane ........ And if everyone knows the Kalashnikov assault rifle, then here are political convictions thing is purely individual, but nevertheless in the past we are all soldiers of the same army, and what should we share?
                1. 0
                  26 October 2012 22: 34
                  So not one I noticed, it’s just right to call the site a political review,

                  Tady Military - Political Review ...
                  1. Alex 241
                    0
                    26 October 2012 22: 36
                    What will we focus on?
          2. zz2003_1974
            -8
            26 October 2012 01: 14
            Yes, you didn’t see anything beyond your threshold, and don’t value anything above your life !!!!!
            1. Alex 241
              0
              26 October 2012 01: 15
              This is a very controversial statement. Moreover, without knowing people who write like this ....
              1. zz2003_1974
                0
                26 October 2012 07: 19
                This is just an answer to his statement, one can say a response, no more no less !!! or anything personal, I judge from his position !!!
          3. dimanf
            -1
            26 October 2012 11: 22
            Quote: laurbalaur
            zz2003_1974 Well, I, my friend, gave my duty in Afghanistan, so with such highs, you can go somewhere to the nearest clinic and ask for a little bleed your testosterone. You remind me of Trotsky.


            do not pay attention to such people.
  13. 0
    25 October 2012 20: 32
    This is our way, BRAVO! This will undoubtedly moderate the militant ardor of some presumptuous democratizers, and will make them think a hundred times before brazenly trampling on international law and continuing to carry out undisguised aggression against Syria, a sovereign state.
  14. Lexa_71rus
    +3
    25 October 2012 20: 33
    Let's hope that this is true because Russia must show that it is not a lagging country that has not stepped out of the mud of the 90s, but a powerful country capable of casting a vote on the world stage and confronting the United States.
  15. +7
    25 October 2012 20: 37
    Is logical. An ally in the war is supposed to help. And then these bastards from the State Department taught everyone to sit and pop under the bench while they carry out humanitarian bombing.

    JV Stalin once said: "The USSR will defend the borders of Mongolia as its own." And everyone immediately calmed down.
    And Rossi today is not shameful to declare that we respect dermocratic values ​​very much, especially in the form of mercenary intervention in an independent state, however, according to international law, we have provided and will continue to render any military assistance that seems appropriate to us.
    It is time to determine our allies and our relationship to the bombing of everyone and everything.
  16. +2
    25 October 2012 20: 43
    Reading articles about the tough position of our commanders-in-chief always gives me goosebumps. The main thing is to have less disinformation from sources like the one indicated by PARTIZAN
  17. +1
    25 October 2012 20: 44
    If they talk about it, even if it is a "duck", then it is a hint that Russia is gaining weight. God grant that it is true. Russia forward.
    1. s1н7т
      -16
      25 October 2012 22: 39
      Quote: artist-mamluk
      Go Russia.

      "Forward" is where? To the war, or what? Will you go yourself? The current army is not capable of war. No way.
      1. +2
        25 October 2012 23: 43
        When did you manage to get rid of skulls on uniform? Correct.
        1. Vanek
          +9
          26 October 2012 06: 05
          Quote: c1n7
          The current army is not capable of war. No way.


          At certain times, you would simply be shot for such a thing. Treason to the Motherland? Enemy of the people?

          I read your comments. And the question arises by itself: - Where will you run?
          1. +7
            26 October 2012 06: 20
            Quote: Vanek
            Where will you run?

            There are three options - Brussels, Washington, London hi
            1. Vanek
              +2
              26 October 2012 06: 24
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              There are three options.


              I would like to hear this from myself ......... Well, you understand from whom.

              Good afternoon, Alexander. hi
              1. +2
                26 October 2012 06: 26
                Quote: Vanek
                I would like to hear it from myself

                Hi Ivan, yes the answer will be the same - Brussels, Washington, London. Other places are less popular with them. hi
                1. Vanek
                  +5
                  26 October 2012 06: 49
                  I don’t understand. I am people tuned by such thoughts. What are they doing here then? After all, no one is holding. Suitcase - station and permanent residence there. After all, no one is holding.

                  As an option. Similar items with things to the exit (to the station) and see how many of them are typed. But what is the plus in this - We will know how much we have left.

                  And along the route of those echelons, with those elements ...... Well, you never know what can happen.
                  1. +7
                    26 October 2012 06: 56
                    Quote: Vanek
                    Suitcase - station and permanent residence there. After all, no one is holding.

                    but who needs them there, if he were a millionaire then yes, welcome, but there are enough ordinary gorlopans there. They are needed here by the West, otherwise they will again have to talk about the unrest in Moscow in the news, and insert the picture from Greece.
                    1. Vanek
                      +3
                      26 October 2012 07: 15
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      talk about the riots in Moscow, and insert the picture from Greece.


                      Not an eyebrow, but an eye. good
            2. 0
              26 October 2012 22: 40
              There are three options - Brussels, Washington, London

              No, London doesn’t roll, it will drown soon, most likely Africa or Latin America (on the principle of the Nazis) ...
        2. Yarbay
          +3
          26 October 2012 08: 54
          Quote: El13
          When did you manage to get rid of skulls on uniform? Correct.

          Killed)))))))))))))))
      2. 0
        26 October 2012 22: 38
        The current army is not capable of war. No way.

        There are many people, from 35 to 50, and literate, who are expelled from the army for disagreeing with the position of the current administration ...
  18. Gorchakov
    0
    25 October 2012 20: 44
    Well done !!! No words ... Emotions overwhelm ...
  19. 0
    25 October 2012 20: 47
    Overwhelms a huge sense of pride in our country! Decisive action! Probably for the first time in recent history, with the exception of the capture of the airfield in Kosovo, but then the strategic plan was not thought out to the end. Now this is a timely step, White starts and ......... (wins?), Black's move, this "Turkish gambit"!
  20. +3
    25 October 2012 20: 51
    What a news! COOL! Respect and respect to the president and the General Staff! This is a real deed! It's time to crack the insolent adversary! soldier If only this news was not a duck!
  21. +1
    25 October 2012 20: 54
    good of course, but hardly true
  22. sxn278619
    -4
    25 October 2012 20: 59
    Another disinformation?
    Laughter alone - this information was disseminated by a source in Damascus, close to the president of Syria.
    So everyone lies about the satellites that everyone sees?
    And NATO doesn’t know anything?
    Turks would have squealed for a long time if true.
    I wonder which zone covers the air defense of the ship?
    1. 0
      25 October 2012 22: 14
      Quote: sxn278619
      So everyone lies about the satellites that everyone sees?
      And NATO doesn’t know anything?
      Turks would have squealed for a long time if true.

      I think you're right
      NATO members would immediately organize some kind of press conference about the "intervention" of Russia, would they stand on duty — when?
      one unknown source and silence from everywhere
    2. 0
      26 October 2012 00: 34
      Quote: sxn278619
      I wonder which zone covers the air defense of the ship?

      up to 100 at that.
  23. +5
    25 October 2012 20: 59
    Finally!!! We have waited for clear and decisive actions.
    It is necessary to growl and show teeth, if circumstances require.
    Over many, many years of concessions, we pleased the authorities with a masculine and strong-willed decision.
  24. kasper
    0
    25 October 2012 21: 05
    Here is the answer!
    so as not to relax in the west!
  25. 0
    25 October 2012 21: 12
    Hurray to Putin! Only Putin is able to stop the aggression of the West! Putin is our president!
    1. s1н7т
      -4
      25 October 2012 22: 42
      It will be right - my president, because, for example, I did not elect him. And these are the majority! And your Putin keeps money in the West, his children live there. So what are we going to "stop" here? laughing
      1. DIMS
        +2
        25 October 2012 22: 47
        About the "majority" it would be worthwhile to somehow confirm their words.
      2. laurbalaur
        -2
        26 October 2012 00: 20
        s1н7т Respect!
    2. 0
      27 October 2012 02: 40
      Oh, Putintsy drew themselves ... already minus.
  26. +4
    25 October 2012 21: 21
    It is a duck or not, but the fact is obvious: we do not stay aside, and we will not stay. The Kremlin is well aware of what will happen if they "surrender" Syria and Iran.
    1. Guun
      +1
      26 October 2012 09: 30
      Then I think Central Asia, they will retreat from the near as all this will spread closer.
    2. 0
      26 October 2012 18: 12
      Are you sure about that? And I doubt something.
  27. ryadovoi
    0
    25 October 2012 21: 21
    Thank you very much for the decisions taken. On time and on schedule. Good luck to the sailors and officers. We are waiting for you at home.
  28. Glory
    +2
    25 October 2012 21: 31
    Great news. Sailors health, good luck, seven feet under the keel !!! angry
    1. sazhka0
      -5
      25 October 2012 22: 03
      Acre slogans have something to say.?
      1. 0
        25 October 2012 22: 43
        What would you like to hear?
  29. Mikado
    +1
    25 October 2012 21: 35
    Oppa, BDK came, they brought some stopudoff heating.
  30. prototype
    +2
    25 October 2012 21: 37
    Well, I don’t know, it’s not a disinformation, they’ve been on combat duty for a year now, they just added landing assaults, but for what? the ground operation that it will give in such a quantity is nothing, to resist the West is not the size you need, bigger and more powerful, the nuclear submarines are unlikely to appear there, rubbish apocalypse from behind Syria will not start here and the question is why are they there? just a demonstration of intentions, but which ones? or if Russian citizens and the Syrian elite should be protected and evacuated if a serious brawler is incurred, I am inclined to the latter, it’s all just to protect your who is there and their investments in the form of their officials and stake out a base in Tartas for yourself to say that we don’t touch our piece, that they wouldn’t have touched the region at all.
  31. +1
    25 October 2012 21: 38
    At least something has begun to take the visible!
  32. whispering
    +2
    25 October 2012 21: 42
    I think if this were true, it would have been transmitted for a long time through all channels .... someone doesn’t believe it ....... but God forbid that it was true .... it's time to put an end .....
    1. Wanderer1980
      0
      26 October 2012 00: 29
      Brother.
      God grant that it turns out to be true.
      Erdoогan will be happy wink
  33. sazhka0
    +6
    25 October 2012 21: 44
    After Syria, the Iranian Caspian ... And your oil is no longer yours .. Easy .. Simply .. Effectively
    Pragmatically .. And These are in our Inner Sea. Beauty .. That is why they "load" the Caspian with new ships ..
  34. +3
    25 October 2012 21: 44
    The ships of the Russian Navy left the Syrian Tartus
    2012-01-10 16:17:49 The ship carrier group of the Russian Navy, which includes the heavy aircraft carrier "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov", left the Syrian port of Tartus, RIA Novosti reports citing the press service of the Russian Northern Fleet.

    As Vestnik Kavkaza reported earlier, a Russian Navy carrier group consisting of three ships, a tugboat and a tanker made a business call at the port of Tartus (Syria) to replenish supplies. Tartus, according to the Russian-Syrian agreement, is a logistics point for the Russian Navy. Is that all I found?
  35. buga1979
    +1
    25 October 2012 21: 44
    here, even if it’s a duck or not, Russia has no other choice; otherwise, who will deal with us and the loss of prestige on the world stage and even Putin will not understand inside the country
  36. Kievan
    -1
    25 October 2012 21: 45
    Information sites are suspiciously silent about this - just like disa. And so it would be nice if the commander of the base in Tartus would bring food and salaries. And it’s a pity the peasant was stuck together with the deputy of neither food, nor salary, around the war. Only relatives from Sevastopol send money, and they grow something there (I saw it on TV) ...
  37. servant
    0
    25 October 2012 21: 45
    Good news, the main thing is that it does not turn out to be a duck.
  38. Pravdoruba
    +1
    25 October 2012 21: 45
    There is our VM base! We will not have Syria and there will be no base! We have every right to protect our own.
    Go Russia good
    1. sazhka0
      +5
      25 October 2012 22: 12
      Boy, you need to be careful with Words. There are Marines Life Death. And you type on the keyboard and rejoice. Are you too weak?? What does "Forward Russia" have to do with it if you don't know the letter "ё".
      1. -1
        26 October 2012 00: 39
        Correctly .
      2. s1н7т
        0
        28 October 2012 00: 57
        In, damn it, how politely it turned out for you!) And I - immediately swear.
    2. laurbalaur
      -2
      26 October 2012 00: 22
      Pravdorub - read diplomatic law, and then broadcast about where and what the state can protect outside its borders.))) laughing
  39. olo-olo
    0
    25 October 2012 22: 05
    Thank God we decided
  40. 0
    25 October 2012 22: 07
    If the info is correct - the decision to send the ships is quite adequate. Although the grouping is not very strong. But she can’t fight the American Navy. And the presence must be indicated.
  41. Volkhov
    +4
    25 October 2012 22: 24
    The entire strength of the RF Armed Forces is hidden from you - 3 days ago, Alexander Otrakovsky landed a landing on the TCP near Kotelny Island to get to the broken helicopter from Peter the Great (it is 600 km north of Tiksi, 8000 from Syria), but our eagles screwed the helicopter from the helicopter to the ship and flew to rescue Syria, but there are a lot of things for the heroes in the world, so they are already flying back - look up, they will hook you with an anchor ...
    The article is of course a test, the repost is quite old, but the comments are wonderful - the level of cheers-patriotism is immediately visible.
  42. sherhan
    -6
    25 October 2012 22: 27
    As predicted ... Maya ... December is near ... the end of the world! drinks
  43. WW3
    WW3
    +3
    25 October 2012 22: 34
    We must not allow Serbs to be bombed like in Yugoslavia, if Russian ships are really off the coast of Syria and this is not a disinformation, then NATO hawks will really close their beak ...
  44. sazhka0
    0
    25 October 2012 22: 34
    Quote: Volkhov
    The article is of course a test, the repost is quite old, but the comments are wonderful - the level of cheers-patriotism is immediately visible.

    And this is just the beginning.. Sending people to their deaths is becoming a habit... Like going to buy bread or throwing out the trash. Easy..
    1. s1н7т
      -1
      28 October 2012 00: 59
      And in vain, as it seems to me.
  45. +8
    25 October 2012 22: 36
    Dear friends. I hasten to upset. This is a reprint of the JULY message from Debka. Now there is NO such information on it.
    1. dimanf
      0
      25 October 2012 23: 20
      Quote: Pimply
      Dear friends. I hasten to upset. This is a reprint of the JULY message from Debka.


      something has become a lot of ducks.
      then Putin’s phone scares the Turks. then the fleet in Syria.
      how many laudatory words have been said about the sun of the nation.

      all this is bewildering overt propaganda!
  46. +3
    25 October 2012 22: 37
    Without 1144, this entire squadron does not make sense as a force capable of holding back our sworn "friends". For AUG, this is all an annoying hindrance, nothing more. I don't think it's true. They are not fools, after all, in command of the fleet? So you can have the entire fleet one by one burn the box.
  47. -1
    25 October 2012 22: 39
    The presence of the Russian sea-based armed forces has been asking for a long time for all the problem regions that are part of Russia's circle of interests. However, ensuring a military presence,
    not supported by a forceful argument, is not an effective means of international political influence. As one not stupid politician said: "... intentions are not important, opportunities are important."
    One of the arguments of the military doctrine of the defense strategy of the Russian Federation
    is the thesis of an asymmetric, but effective adequate threat of response.
    He who has ears, hears, as it is written in a famous book.
    And having in addition to the ears as an appendage, such a trifle as a head.,
    comprehend the situation on a strategic scale.
  48. sazhka0
    +1
    25 October 2012 22: 45
    Quote: lablizn
    One of the arguments of the military doctrine of the defense strategy of the Russian Federation
    is the thesis of an asymmetric, but effective adequate threat of response.

    With what, how and by whom? Throw hats at them???
  49. Bob
    -1
    25 October 2012 22: 48
    Sooner or later it would have to clash ... It's better now (and not in 2015-2020, when our strategic nuclear forces are completely weakened) and not on our territory (the Caucasus, etc.). Definitely - this is a knight's move in a chess game called World War 3. But there is not much to be happy about yet ... if we compare the military potential of NATO countries and Russia. However, in history there were battles in which they won not by great strength, but by military skill and art. However, it is one thing to swing swords, and another to use nuclear charges. We would like to wish all of us - good luck and fortitude, and of course, PEACEFUL SKY.
  50. Kievan
    +8
    25 October 2012 22: 49
    Someone delete this fake news, otherwise people have already suffered in fantasy.
    And post in the news that we have a big holiday:
    "Ministry of Defense: two combat boats" Gyurza-M "for the Navy have been laid down. By 2017, nine boats of this project will replenish the Russian fleet."

    http://www.mil.gov.ua/index.php?lang=ru&part=news&sub=read&id=26149
    And how stupid to write about Ukraine so please (http://topwar.ru/20337-mify-ukrainskoy-istorii.html), but how good news is silence.
    1. -2
      26 October 2012 00: 50
      Do not whimper I am those who are identical + so you look at the skull will fly soon,
  51. 0
    25 October 2012 23: 12
    This is a duck...And I really wanted to believe it!
    Ugh. Mine defense bureaucrats only line their own pockets.
    They don't care about the country: negative Let us remind you that today investigators of the Investigative Committee opened 5 criminal cases at once for fraud with lands and shares of Oboronservice OJSC, controlled by the Ministry of Defense. According to preliminary estimates, the damage is at least 3 billion rubles.
    1. dimanf
      0
      25 October 2012 23: 31
      Quote: genad2
      Defense mine bureaucrats only line their own pockets.
      They don't care about the country:. Let us recall that today the investigators of the Investigative Committee opened 5 criminal cases at once for fraud with lands and shares of the Ministry of Defense-controlled JSC "Oboronservis". According to preliminary estimates, the damage is at least 3 billion rubles.


      and who reassigned Stoolkin?
      Thanks to Comrade Putin for the Minister of Defense!
    2. +1
      27 October 2012 02: 44
      Let us remind you that today investigators of the Investigative Committee opened 5 criminal cases at once for fraud with lands and shares of Oboronservice OJSC, controlled by the Ministry of Defense.

      most likely, these cases will be closed by the main military or general, as was the case with the cops in the Moscow region...
  52. 0
    25 October 2012 23: 29
    Sounds like the truth. If they write to the Israeli media, it sounds like the truth. What's the point of lying? If so, then the mattress makers and their lackeys are feeling the piss... and intensely. I'll rummage through the web.
  53. mazdie
    -1
    25 October 2012 23: 32
    But I wouldn’t want to believe in this writing, you can believe the facts, and this is an alternative reality! We are not yet able to compete in conventional weapons, probably now with no other NATO country. It's a shame...
    One hope is for the Youth, I hope they will be smarter. Our task is to gain time, which is what we are trying to do.
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 00: 53
      Quote: mazdie
      Our task

      +
    2. -1
      26 October 2012 09: 50
      We are not yet able to compete in conventional weapons, probably now with no other NATO country. It's a shame...



      Bullshit.
      1. Gorchakov
        -1
        26 October 2012 15: 37
        Quote: Recon
        Bullshit.

        Sorry, I'm an idiot, I gave you a minus by mistake....
  54. -1
    25 October 2012 23: 58
    I don’t understand anything, is it true or fake?
  55. tambu
    -1
    26 October 2012 00: 02
    two frigates and one destroyer....... for a serious thief is not enough, but as a stopping factor it is more than enough.... this is no fucking joke....
  56. tekinoral
    0
    26 October 2012 00: 31
    How you all want to bomb Turkey, but have you thought about the consequences, what they might be?
    1. +2
      29 October 2012 01: 15
      Nobody wants to bomb anyone.
      There is simply a desire for the Turks not to bomb anyone and not get into trouble at all. Otherwise, the moment will definitely come for them when they will have to think about the consequences.
  57. +1
    26 October 2012 00: 48
    The ship in the photo looks dangerous
    1. +5
      26 October 2012 09: 53
      Purely Soviet school of combat shipbuilding, it looks like a feast for the eyes, but there is an unwritten law, if the equipment is beautiful, then it is effective! I hope that all the Soviet ships that will someday be decommissioned will be placed in a maritime museum, as the Americans do, so that anyone can visit it. I would have torn off the hands of those who put such handsome men under the knife in the 90s..
  58. 0
    26 October 2012 00: 48
    There is no doubt that declassifying data on positioning, deployment, movements, regroupings and other actions of units of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is a crime. designated in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
    However, information that reaches the media through unofficial channels and is not a state secret is not subject to prosecution under the law.
    Let us correlate the fact of publication of the article with the conclusions of the Interdepartmental Commission (interdepartmental commission) of the Russian Navy dated 12.09.12, which declared priority
    development of countermeasures based on new development systems
    Nuclear submarines 9хх and 88х projects, together with modernized complexes
    weapons, including carriers with nuclear warheads.
    There is no doubt that a separate squadron, a grouping representing the provision of tactical tasks, cannot be
    any serious threat to the violation of any status qwo,
    currently existing in terms of military presence.
    The only case of justified introduction of the mentioned units
    in the tension zone is hidden support for additional
    countermeasures (in this case we will consider nuclear submarines).
  59. 0
    26 October 2012 00: 55
    All lights out. The morning is wiser than the evening.
  60. 0
    26 October 2012 01: 16
    We have so many outright cowards on the forum, coming up with a bunch of excuses not to take active action, justifying Russia’s sitting out at a time when action is needed. You read and feel uneasy—it was precisely these people who were subjected to repression during Stalin’s time, and they did the right thing. Destructive elements
  61. Rodion
    0
    26 October 2012 01: 38
    For the first time I am so happy for the decision of the GDP!!!)))))
    1. s1н7т
      0
      28 October 2012 01: 06
      Did you grieve over the previous 12 years? laughing
  62. DRY
    DRY
    +1
    26 October 2012 06: 07
    I am for such leadership, keep it up, and we will support you if anything happens. In general, it will not rust behind us.
    1. Vanek
      0
      26 October 2012 06: 21
      And We will have no way out.
  63. 0
    26 October 2012 06: 47
    5 BDK - Marine Corps unit lol , yes, there will be an army of 5 large landing ships, good news!! It should have been like this for a long time!
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 06: 54
      Quote: kostyan77708
      good news!!

      The news is good, but there is no confirmation yet. request
      1. -1
        26 October 2012 07: 55
        I agree there is no confirmation unfortunately, but I hope there will be
      2. +4
        26 October 2012 08: 27
        Sasha, this is news on Debka, the news is July, not October, and even then it was a “duck”
  64. Guun
    0
    26 October 2012 07: 17
    I remember someone on the website posted satellite images about the locations of the Russian Navy in Syria. Then he showed all the amers’ bases smile
    You need to look at the ports in Syria from above to see whether there are Russian Navy ships there or not.
    This news needs to be checked, in case it is false information.
  65. Voin sveta82
    -1
    26 October 2012 07: 25
    Already not bad...))) Let's see what happens next.... and so our move... is, in principle, correct...))) Normal.
  66. -2
    26 October 2012 09: 45
    Does our leadership finally have balls?!
  67. +1
    26 October 2012 09: 47
    dropped anchor, didn't drop, what's the difference. there is confirmation no - what's the difference. Russia is fighting for its interests, including informationally.

    The Navy announced that it will organize permanent duty off the coast of Syria? I think this was back in July. So they're on duty.
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 15: 29
      vorobey - the community called Russian citizens needs real confirmation that those in power have "balls".... and that our Ministry of Defense, like a periodic prostitute, talks about its future unique successes, and then explains with a smart look , why did they, “successes”, go to the wrong steppe... WE ARE ALREADY USED - agree that we have all been waiting for a LONG TIME from ALL THEIR real deeds and not an episodic concussion of air... where the exhaust has only a stench. They will show teeth and the presence of a ridge - personally, I will be sincerely happy.
      1. 0
        27 October 2012 17: 01
        Quote: viktor_ui
        They will show teeth and the presence of a ridge - personally, I will be sincerely happy.

        The main thing is that you don’t get punched in those teeth later, but rather chew something off, and then of course we’ll all be happy.
  68. djon3volta
    -1
    26 October 2012 09: 49
    If this were true, on Russian CT channels they would show 100%, on ORT, Russia 24, Star would show it first.
    duck it.
  69. +5
    26 October 2012 10: 26
    Unfortunately, it's a "duck". All the news sites that published this link in a circle to each other, and ultimately to Israel. The Israeli agency that launched the “duck” is small and in no way reflects not only the official position of anyone, but also the true state of affairs. Just fantasies.

    One thought is constructive - perhaps this is a trial balloon, to look at the reaction in the country and in the World...
  70. VPO
    VPO
    +1
    26 October 2012 12: 10
    Duck 100 percent. Our ships are being watched by everyone. The howl would be so... woohoo. It would be a different matter if they went to the port for a couple of days and unloaded, for example, 300 cornets, mestizos. They would have sent a dozen specialist instructors. Yes, there is a lot of things that can be thrown at the Syrians. I hope this is happening, although it’s hard to believe that everything is impotent for now.
  71. Gorchakov
    0
    26 October 2012 15: 47
    It's a pity that this essentially good information was not confirmed... But on the other hand, the number of patriots and provocateurs from Western agents became visible on the forum... I think that nothing happens for no reason on the networks and the opinions of forum members will be taken into account by someone, somewhere and sometime...
  72. Bashkaus
    0
    26 October 2012 17: 25
    Whether it is deza or not in this case does not matter.
    This is an information war.
    It’s as if we are sending ships, and the Americans seem to be reacting to this. Everything is virtual. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out that both we and the amers are driving a whole fleet back and forth, while the ships are at the base, money for fuel, etc. stand out and are sawed off.
    The main thing is that ours could knock on the stars and stripes in the snout. And being in Sevastopol in the summer, I watched the training of the Marines every day from the balcony and I have a suspicion that our guys will snitch on them and give them more kicks. Do they chase them back and forth, or do they sit quietly for now on the basis so far there is no difference.
    1. 0
      29 October 2012 12: 17
      If this is an information war, then on which side is the fighter who posted this article on this site fighting?
  73. 0
    26 October 2012 18: 04
    If the Turks enter into confrontation with RUSSIA, then NATO must be involved.

    Yeah, they will get involved, as always, they will express strong “concern”, but with an article from their protocol they will cover up their moral and technical nakedness.

    Well, maybe they will threaten with some kind of sanctions, or they will issue another “Magnitsky List” with a bang, they can do that, yes. But they are not ready for more than Serbia or Libya (they were even afraid to enter there themselves).
  74. Ruslan_07
    0
    26 October 2012 20: 22
    We will protect
  75. Gromila78
    +2
    26 October 2012 23: 45
    After reading this material I burst into tears from laughter laughing Our ships have mastered teleportation. As soon as "Otrakovsky" landed troops on Kotelny Island (see http://vz.ru/news/2012/10/24/603994.html), it immediately ended up in Tartus. I’m also silent about the other landing ships of the Northern Fleet. Don't believe this article - it's complete nonsense. (see also http://www.newstube.ru/media/v-severomorsk-iz-dal-nego-poxoda-vernulis-desantnye
    -korabli). That's when they returned from a long hike.
    1. 0
      27 October 2012 19: 42
      no one monitors the real movements of our ships, so the majority believe such messages!
      1. +1
        28 October 2012 17: 17
        Quote: altman
        no one is watching

        But somewhere in those parts there are ours!
        There seemed to be a message from 11:01 / 28.10.2012/XNUMX/XNUMX
        As Bagnet was told in the information support department of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, after leaving the Greek port of Piraeus, the large landing ship Novocherkassk conducted joint exercises in the Aegean Sea with the Greek Navy corvette Daniolos.
        According to the head of the information support department of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Captain 1st Rank Vyacheslav Trukhachev, the crews of the ships in difficult weather conditions worked out elements of voice and visual communication, joint maneuvering, resupply at sea, as well as actions to inspect intruder ships.
        “One of the most dynamic episodes of the exercise was the testing of the actions of Russian and Greek ships to monitor the movement of civil aviation aircraft and interact in repelling asymmetric threats - the destruction of small, low-flying targets. The Greek Navy helicopter became a conditional target for the ships’ air defense systems,” the officer said.

        wink
  76. insomnia
    0
    27 October 2012 20: 55
    The news is certainly controversial, on the one hand, but it’s still better than doing nothing. Of course, there may be consequences, and not pleasant ones, but this is a foreign policy step! Raises prestige, after all.
    As for the Turks, they themselves are not going to go anywhere. Assad promised to release the gas in the event of military intervention by anyone. And by the way, he will do the right thing...
  77. wax
    +1
    29 October 2012 01: 36
    Without intervention, Assad will win. Our task is to prevent intervention from Turkey (they warned) and from the sea (they sent ships). We must have reached an agreement with Iraq. Israel won't help. Jordan too. Lebanon is not critical.
    According to the Russian Navy, "Admiral Chabanenko" is one of the most powerful and modern ships in Russia. Its length is 164 meters, width - 19 meters. The ship, with a displacement of 7400 tons, can reach speeds of up to 30 knots.
    "Admiral Chabanenko" is equipped with "Moskit" anti-ship systems, "Kinzhal" and "Kortik" rapid-fire anti-aircraft systems, "Udav" rocket launchers, "Vodopad" anti-submarine systems and two KA-32 helicopters.
  78. +1
    29 October 2012 12: 32
    Yes, for reference. Admirals' opinion:
    http://www.mk.ru/politics/article/2011/11/10/641804-turetskiy-flot-pochti-v-5-ra
    z-silnee-flota-rossii.html
    and the composition of the Turkish fleet:
    http://www.flot.com/news/vpk/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=33746

    I am for Syria, of course. But how to defend it? Well, if you consider that Turkey is a major buyer of our gas. The implementation of the "South Stream" largely depends on Turkey, then it is clear that we can only defend Syria with virtual fleets and virtual threats like "if even one Turkish soldier"... It's sad. We have only one real guy left who can make the Turks think about their wrongness - our chief sanitary doctor G.G. Onishchenko. He can find pathogens of dysentery and stop the flow of our tourists. That's all.
  79. +1
    29 October 2012 17: 39
    From these guys this event is “heroism”, although real heroism is in what is left of the fleet to carry out the combat mission for today’s sailors
  80. 0
    30 October 2012 12: 02
    Quote: 30143
    If the Turks enter into confrontation with RUSSIA
    -Tourists just need to stop going to Turland and they themselves will regret it. about the fact that they started such a mess.
  81. dchanc112
    0
    31 October 2012 13: 47
    Based on the composition of the ships. Russia is preparing for the possible evacuation of Russian citizens and specific property. Alas, the Turkish fleet has long been out of its pocket. NATO strike groups will steamroller this detachment (the name corresponds to the composition and types), but this will not happen, because they understand that this is just "show-off"!
    1. vikot
      +1
      31 October 2012 14: 41
      NATO strike forces are not in the Mediterranean Sea, but in the strait. The Turks will probably hesitate to pass like a skating rink
      1. dchanc112
        -1
        31 October 2012 14: 48
        =NATO's strike forces are not in the Mediterranean,= . They are everywhere and not in a detachment with an anti-submarine ship at the head, but in fleets.
  82. vikot
    +1
    31 October 2012 14: 40
    Damn, I really couldn’t believe that the country’s leadership would decide to do this. But now I would like to understand: what guided our rulers when they actually surrendered Libya to Comrade. Gaddafi? Or why didn’t we need Libya?!
  83. 0
    1 November 2012 14: 59
    I tried to read everything... but no one said that this is our last base in the Mediterranean, and most importantly, with a simple glance at the map or a satellite image, I noticed that this is the only place for our country from where Turkey (I quote Romney's pre-election statement in relation to RUSSIA: our main geopolitical enemy"), the eternal tool of the West in the fight to screw Russia, can get "pincers". The northern part is already weakened in the form of Ukraine and Georgia, and their southern, the only part (pincers) Naval Base in Syria will naturally perish in God with the liquidation of not the REGIME!!!! B. Assad. but the legally elected government of this country, whatever it is, but the LAW! Remember the Latin saying - the Law is blind, but it is the law! And the Americans, arranging "velvet revolutions" and thereby creating an enemy for themselves in the form of a legitimate government from Al-Qaeda in Asian countries, are looking for an alternative to the USSR in a non-nuclear form and, accordingly, in a protracted and massive a non-nuclear war for the glory of liberating the progressive part of humanity from the approaching yoke of Muslim fanatics and saving their economy that is so indebted to the whole world. I have many friends who fled from the Uzbeks to the States.... So they tell me that in the States themselves they don't say anything about Russia at all! There, no one gives a damn about anything except what they're going to eat tonight!!!! That's how it is, gentlemen! We'll shit on Syria - They'll start shooting at Georgia and say that it was fired from Russia. And possession of the strait is not a privilege, but a constant fear - the capture of a narrow strip of coast protruding forward: this is the easiest tactical task! - And if necessary, it can be expanded!
    Now regarding the information war. so this is directed at us, the dependence on resources in other areas is so great that if we ourselves don’t believe in it, then the effect will be 0%, well, Europe (read its media) will scream, but what about our own? Problems diverting attention!!! So what? They will scream and shout, but they won’t stop eating our gas and oil! So their cry will be drowned out by the slurping of our oil!!!! Forget about all their media - Whoever treats a girl dances her! Unfortunately, after the collapse of the USSR, our former republics, indirectly related to this problem (Ukraine, Georgia), prefer to be “Danced” by everyone except Russia, well, after a long family life, you want something new - spicy, only new experience brings and new sensations in the form of PAIN - in the place where they are “danced”.